2010-21394. Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of August 9, 2010 through August 13, 2010.

In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.

I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:

(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased absolutely; and

(3) One of the following must be satisfied:

(A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have increased;

(B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are directly incorporated, have increased;

(C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more component parts produced outside the United States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have increased;

(D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have increased; and

(4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or production of such firm; or

II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied:

(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2) One of the following must be satisfied:

(A) There has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign country in the production of articles or supply of services like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;

(B) There has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and

(3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers' separation or threat of separation.

In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met.

(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such agency; and

(3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation.

In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must be met.

(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated;

(2) The workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or production is related to the article or service that was the basis for such certification; and

(3) Either—

(A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or

(B) A loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or threat of separation.

In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met.

(1) The workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in—

(A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat thereof under section 202(b)(1);

(B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat thereof under section 421(b)(1); or

(C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));

(2) the petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the date on which—

(A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or

(B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and

(3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the workers' firm within—

(A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or

(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1- year period preceding the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination.

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W No.	Subject firm	Location	Impact date
72,956	Jasper Chair Company	Jasper, IN	November 19, 2008.
73,302	Wolfe Dye & Bleach Works, Inc	Shoemakersville, PA	January 7, 2009.
73,587	ArcelorMittal Weirton, Inc., Leased Workers from The Hudson Company	Weirton, WV	February 26, 2009.
74,001	Connextions, Inc., Sprint Operating Unit	Concord, NC	April 20, 2009.
74,460	Sing Fei, Inc	San Francisco, CA	July 24, 2009.

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W No.	Subject firm	Location	Impact date
72,734	Nukote International, Inc	Rochester, NY	October 30, 2008.
72,896	Staffmark, Working On Site at Leach International	Buena Park, CA	November 18, 2008.
72,936	Current Medicine Group, LLC, Springs Science+Business Media Finance, Inc	Philadelphia, PA	November 19, 2008.
73,450	Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Employee Reporting to Woodland Park, NJ	Woodland Park, NJ	January 29, 2009.
73,450A	Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc	Winona, MN	January 29, 2009.
73,450B	Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc	Greenville, TX	January 29, 2009.
73,450C	Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc.	Piedmont, SC	January 29, 2009.
73,450D	Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc	Anaheim, CA	January 29, 2009.
73,450E	Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc	Havre De Grace, MD	January 29, 2009.
73,450F	Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc	Smyrna, GA	January 29, 2009.
73,450G	Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc	Westwego, LA	January 29, 2009.
73,450H	Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc	Mount Pleasant, TN	January 29, 2009.
73,450I	Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc	Stamford, CT	January 29, 2009.
73,450J	Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc	North Augusta, SC	January 29, 2009.
73,450K	Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Employees, Leased Workers from Advanced Personnel, etc	Tempe, AZ	January 29, 2009.
73,513	Farley's and Sathers Candy Company, Inc., On-site Leased Workers from Doherty Staffing Solutions	Round Lake, MN	February 17, 2009.
73,577	Aigis Mechtronics, Inc., A Subsidiary of Nortek, Inc., Leased Workers of Adecco Employment Services	Winston-Salem, NC	February 22, 2009.
73,635	The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations, etc., Off-Site Workers Reporting to St. Louis, MO	St. Louis, MO	February 24, 2009.
73,635A	The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & Technology Div. & Information Technology Div	St. Charles, MO	February 24, 2009.
73,635B	The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & Technology Div. & Information Technology Div	Hazelwood, MO	February 24, 2009.
73,753	Lodging by Liberty, Inc., Brown Jordan International, Inc.; BJI Employee Services; etc	Liberty, NC	March 15, 2009.
73,775	Eli Lilly and Company, Chemical Process Research and Development Pilot Plant	Indianapolis, IN	March 22, 2009.
73,796	Keane, Inc., Teachers Insurance Annuity Association—College Retirement Equities Fund	Denver, CO	March 26, 2009.
73,806	Multina, USA	Plattsburgh, NY	March 18, 2009.
73,849	LTX-Credence Corporation, Leased Workers from ATR International, Inc	Hillsboro, OR	March 16, 2009.
73,878	HNTB Corporation, HNTB Holding, LTD., Accounting Department	Kansas City, MO	April 1, 2009.
73,917	Stanadyne Corporation, Pencil Nozzel Injector Division, Leased Workers from Pro-Type	Jacksonville, NC	April 13, 2009.
74,012	GM Powertrain Defiance CET, General Motors	Defiance, OH	April 14, 2009.
74,058	Pentel of America, Ltd., Manufacturing Division	Torrance, CA	May 6, 2009.
74,112	Edwards Vacuum, Inc., Leased Workers from Manpower and Kforce	Tewksbury, MA	May 17, 2009.
74,140	Sweater Project Corp	North Bergen, NJ	May 11, 2009.
74,223	White's Metal Works, Inc	Bassett, VA	June 10, 2009.
74,293	The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & Technology Div. & Information Technology Div	Long Beach, CA	June 7, 2009.
74,293A	The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & Technology Div. & Information Technology Div	Anaheim, CA	June 7, 2009.
74,293B	The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & Technology Div. & Information Technology Div	El Segundo, CA	June 7, 2009.
74,293C	The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & Technology Div. & Information Technology Div	Huntington Beach, CA	June 7, 2009.
74,293D	The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & Technology Div. & Information Technology Div	Irvine, CA	June 7, 2009.
74,293E	The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & Technology Div. & Information Technology Div	Lemoore, CA	June 7, 2009.
74,293F	The Boeing Company, Engineering Operations & Technology Div. & Information Technology Div	Seal Beach, CA	June 7, 2009.
74,348	The TriZetto Group, Inc., Leased Workers from Syntel Limited, Inforonics, LLC, etc	Greenwood Village, CO	July 1, 2009.
74,354	HSBC Card Services, Inc., HSBC North American Holdings, Security and Fraud Dept., etc	Tulsa, OK	June 18, 2009.
74,381	Quiksilver Americas, Quiksliver Screenprint Operations, Leased Workers from Rainmaker Staffing	Huntington Beach, CA	May 8, 2010.
74,391	Travelers Indemnity Company, Claims Services, Workers' Compensation Subrogation	Wyomissing, PA	July 13, 2009.
74,394	Laserwords U.S., Inc., Laserwords Private LTD, Leased Workers from Kelly Services	Lewiston, ME	June 11, 2009.
74,433	Prudential Insurance Company of America, Prudential Retirement	Hartford, CT	July 26, 2009.
74,441	Hagemeyer North America, El Paso Branch	El Paso, TX	July 19, 2009.
74,442	Hagemeyer North America, Mcallen Branch	McAllen, TX	July 19, 2009.
74,443	StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department, Off-Site Teleworker Bryan Martin	Denver, CO	July 19, 2009.
74,443A	StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department	Collinsville, VA	July 19, 2009.
74,443B	StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department	Decatur, IL	July 19, 2009.
74,443C	StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department	Jonesboro, AR	July 19, 2009.
74,443D	StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department	Mansfield, OH	July 19, 2009.
74,443E	StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department	Lynchburg, VA	July 19, 2009.
74,443F	StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department	Enid, OK	July 19, 2009.
74,443G	StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department	Grand Junction, CO	July 19, 2009.
74,457	Leach International, Esterline Technologies, Leased Workers from Ultimate Staffing Service, etc	Buena Park, CA	July 22, 2009.
74,461	Providence Chain Company, Leased Workers from Microtech Staffing Group and Occupations Unlimited	Providence, RI	July 30, 2009.

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W No.	Subject firm	Location	Impact date
72,886	Turner Techtronics, Inc	Burbank, CA	November 17, 2008.
73,165	James Hamilton Construction Company, Tyrone Mine	Silver City, NM	December 23, 2008.

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(c) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.

TA-W No.	Subject firm	Location	Impact date
73,431	Milliken & Company, Apparel Division	Barnwell, SC	January 19, 2009.

Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified.

The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or (b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or threat of separation) of section 222 has not been met.

TA-W No.	Subject firm	Location	Impact date
72,283	International Business Machines (IBM), Global Technology Services Delivery Division, Massachusetts Teleworkers	Endicott, NY
72,283A	International Business Machines (IBM), Domino Server Application Development Team, etc., Massachusetts Teleworkers	Endicott, NY
74,256	Ferragon Corporation, Ferrous Metal Processing Company	Brooklyn, OH

The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met.

TA-W No.	Subject firm	Location	Impact date
72,842	Nabors Well Services, Ltd., Nabors Industries, Ltd	San Angelo, TX
72,971	ASC Machine Tools, Inc	Spokane Valley, WA
73,101	Tyler Pipe Company, Soil/Plumbing Division, North Plant	Tyler, TX
73,110	Robin Industries, Inc., Cleveland Manufacturing	Cleveland, OH
73,374	Marshalltown Company	Marshalltown, IA
73,413	Unit Structures, LLC	Magnolia, AR
73,717	Aperto Networks, Inc., Operations Department	Milpitas, CA
73,723	FirstSolutions, Claims Processing Center	Two Harbors, MN
73,863	SuperMedia, LLC, FKA Idearc Media, LLC, Supermedia Information Services, LLC	Bensalem, PA
73,950	Auto Builders, Inc	Ladson, SC
74,021	Diagnostic Staffing Services, LLC	Pittsburgh, PA
74,281	Humana Insurance Company, Carenetwork, Inc	Green Bay, WI
74,321	Beloit Health Systems/Beloit Clinic, The Health Information Management Transcription Department	Beloit, WI
74,362	Harley-Davidson Motor Company Operations, Inc	York, PA

Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker Adjustment Assistance

After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these petitions.

The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn.

TA-W No.	Subject firm	Location	Impact date
72,463	Draexlmaier Automotive of America, LLC	Duncan, SC
72,771	HMC Technologies	New Albany, MS
73,827	Architectural Glazing Technologies, On-site Leased Workers Bonney Staffing	Sanford, ME
74,273	Doyle and Roth Manufacturing Company, Inc	Simpson, PA
74,383	Blen-Col, Inc., DBA L&A Molding (Hudson Color Concentrates)	Leominster, MA
74,451	StarTek USA, Inc., Off-Site Worker	Denver, CO

The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases would serve no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be covered by more than one certification at a time.

TA-W No.	Subject firm	Location	Impact date
73,589	DuPont Performance Coatings, E.I. Dupont De Nemours Company OEM	Fenton, MO
74,092	Cytec Engineered Materials, Inc., Corporate Service Employees	Winona, MN
74,093	Cytec Engineered Materials, Inc., Corporate Service Division	Greenville, TX
74,094	Cytec Carbon Fibers, LLC, Corporate Service Division	Piedmont, SC
74,095	Cytec Engineered Materials, Inc., Corporate Service Division	Anaheim, CA
74,096	Cytec Engineered Materials, Inc., Corporate Service Division	Havre de Grace, MD
74,097	Cytec Surface Specialties, Inc., Corporate Service Division	Smyrna, GA
74,098	Building Block Chemicals, Corporate Service Division	Westwego, LA
74,099	Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Division	Mount Pleasant, TN
74,100	Cytec Industries, Inc., Corporate Service Division	Stamford, CT
74,101	Cytec Surface Specialties, Inc., Corporate Service Division	North Augusta, SC
74,102	Cytec Engineered Materials, Inc., Corporate Service Division	Tempe, AZ
74,216	Prudential Insurance Company of America, Prudential Retirement	Moosic, PA
74,444	StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department	Collinsville, VA
74,445	StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department	Decatur, IL
74,446	StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department	Jonesboro, AR
74,447	StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department	Mansfield, OH
74,448	StarTek USA, Inc., Resource Planning Department	Lynchburg, VA
74,449	StarTek USA, Inc	Enid, OK
74,450	StarTek USA, Inc	Grand Junction, CO

The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the Department issued a negative determination on petitions related to the relevant investigation period applicable to the same worker group. The duplicative petitions did not present new information or a change in circumstances that would result in a reversal of the Department's previous negative determination, and therefore, further investigation would duplicate efforts and serve no purpose.

TA-W No.	Subject firm	Location	Impact date
73,844	J.C. Penney Company, Inc.	Waterford, MI

I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of August 9, 2010 through August 13, 2010. Copies of these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of Information Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA), U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or [e-mail]. These determinations also are available on the Department's Web site at http://www.doleta.gov/​tradeact under the searchable listing of determinations.

Dated: August 19, 2010.

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.