99-22213. Standard Measurement System Exemption from Gross Tonnage  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 168 (Tuesday, August 31, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 47402-47404]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-22213]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Coast Guard
    
    46 CFR Part 69
    
    [USCG-1999-5118]
    RIN 2115-AF76
    
    
    Standard Measurement System Exemption from Gross Tonnage
    
    AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Direct final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: By this direct final rule, the Coast Guard amends its vessel 
    tonnage regulations to reinstate a previously allowed method of holding 
    tonnage opening cover plates in place. This amendment will increase 
    flexibility and can decrease costs in vessel design and construction, 
    while in no way diminishing vessel safety. The reinstated method was 
    omitted in error during a comprehensive revision of the tonnage 
    regulations in 1989.
    
    DATES: This rule is effective November 29, 1999, unless a written 
    adverse comment, or written notice of intent to submit an adverse 
    comment, reaches the Docket Management Facility on or before November 
    1, 1999. If an adverse comment, or notice of intent to submit an 
    adverse comment, is received, the Coast Guard will withdraw this direct
    
    [[Page 47403]]
    
    final rule and publish a timely notice of withdrawal in the Federal 
    Register.
    
    ADDRESSES: To make sure your comments and related material are not 
    entered more than once in the docket, please submit them by only one of 
    the following means:
        (1) By mail to the Docket Management Facility (USCG-1999-5118), 
    U.S. Department of Transportation, room PL-401, 400 Seventh Street SW., 
    Washington, DC 20590-0001.
        (2) By hand delivery to room PL-401 on the Plaza level of the 
    Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. 
    and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The 
    telephone number is 202-366-9329.
        (3) By fax to the Docket Management Facility at 202-493-2251.
        (4) Electronically through the Web Site for the Docket Management 
    System at http://dms.dot.gov.
    
        The Docket Management Facility maintains the public docket for this 
    rulemaking. Comments and material received from the public, as well as 
    documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, 
    will become part of this docket and will be available for inspection or 
    copying at room PL-401 on the Plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 
    Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m., and 5 p.m., Monday 
    through Friday, except Federal holidays. You may also find this docket 
    on the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions on this rule, call Mr. 
    Peter Eareckson, Marine Safety Center, Coast Guard, telephone 202-366-
    6441. For questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, 
    call Dorothy Walker, Chief, Dockets, Department of Transportation, 
    telephone 202-366-9329.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Request for Comments
    
        The Coast Guard encourages you to participate in this rulemaking by 
    submitting comments and related material. If you do so, please include 
    your name and address, identify the docket number for this rulemaking 
    (USCG-1999-5118), indicate the specific section of this document to 
    which each comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. You 
    may submit your comments and material by mail, hand delivery, fax, or 
    electronic means to the Docket Management Facility at the address under 
    ADDRESSES; but please submit your comments and material by only one 
    means. If you submit them by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an 
    unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for 
    copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail and would 
    like to know they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped, self-
    addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and 
    material received during the comment period. We may change this rule in 
    view of them.
    
    Regulatory Information
    
        The Coast Guard is publishing a direct final rule, the procedures 
    of which are outlined in 33 CFR 1.05-55, because no adverse comment is 
    anticipated. If no adverse comment or written notice of intent to 
    submit an adverse comment is received within the specified comment 
    period, this rule will become effective as stated in the DATES section. 
    In that case, approximately 30 days before the effective date, we will 
    publish a document in the Federal Register stating that no adverse 
    comment was received and confirming that this rule will become 
    effective as scheduled. However, if we receive a written adverse 
    comment or written notice of intent to submit an adverse comment, we 
    will publish a document in the Federal Register announcing withdrawal 
    of all or part of this direct final rule. If an adverse comment applies 
    to only part of this rule and it is possible to remove that part 
    without defeating the purpose of this rule, we may adopt as final those 
    parts of this rule on which no adverse comment was received. The part 
    of this rule that was the subject of an adverse comment will be 
    withdrawn. If we decide to proceed with a rulemaking following receipt 
    of an adverse comment, we will publish a separate Notice of Proposed 
    Rulemaking (NPRM) and provide a new opportunity for comment.
        A comment is considered ``adverse'' if the comment explains why 
    this rule would be inappropriate, including a challenge to the rule's 
    underlying premise or approach, or would be ineffective or unacceptable 
    without a change.
    
    Background and Discussion of Changes
    
        Coast Guard tonnage regulations in 46 CFR part 69, subpart C, 
    provide exemptions from gross tonnage for superstructure spaces open to 
    the weather. To qualify the associated space as open to weather, the 
    end bulkhead is fitted either with shifting boards dropped into channel 
    sections or with a temporary coverplate or boards held in place with 
    hook bolts meeting the specific criteria stated in 46 CFR 69.117(d). 
    Before 1989, the tonnage regulations allowed a bolting and crosspiece 
    holding arrangement to keep the boards/plates in place. This 
    alternative arrangement effectively ``sandwiched'' the associated 
    bulkhead between the boards/plates and crosspieces. In a 1989 
    rulemaking (54 FR 37657, September 12, 1989), we revised and clarified 
    the tonnage measurement regulations in 46 CFR part 69 without 
    ``substantive change not called for under Public Law 99-509'' (which 
    revised and consolidated the tonnage measurement laws into a new part J 
    of 46 U.S.C. subtitle II). In revising part 69, we omitted this 
    alternative holding method in error.
        Recently the Coast Guard received complaints from vessel designers 
    and builders that the deletion of the bolting and crosspiece option for 
    tonnage opening covers reduced flexibility and increased costs in 
    vessel design and construction with no advantage in safety or function. 
    These complaints prompted the Coast Guard to review the 1989 
    rulemaking. We found that Public Law 99-509, the basis for the 1989 
    rule, did not address tonnage openings, and no Coast Guard records 
    indicate any disadvantages to the bolting and crosspiece arrangement 
    alternative. Our review determined that the bolting and crosspiece 
    arrangement option was omitted in error during the 1989 rulemaking. We 
    are reinstating this option by amending 46 CFR 69.117(d) and (e) 
    accordingly. Additionally, we are making several editorial changes to 
    this section to improve clarity. Paragraphs (d)(2) and (e)(3) are 
    amended to add references to newly revised paragraphs (d)(5) and 
    (d)(6).
    
    Regulatory Evaluation
    
        This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 
    3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an assessment of 
    potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The 
    Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. 
    It is not ``significant'' under the regulatory policies and procedures 
    of the Department of Transportation (DOT)(44 FR 11040, February 26, 
    1979). We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that 
    a full Regulatory Evaluation under paragraph 10e of the regulatory 
    policies and procedures of DOT is unnecessary.
        This rule will not impose any additional costs on industry. The 
    reinstatement of the bolting and crosspiece arrangement, which was 
    deleted in error in 1989, will allow for increased flexibility in 
    vessel design and construction, while in no way diminishing vessel 
    safety. This
    
    [[Page 47404]]
    
    regulation will make the use of the bolting and crosspiece arrangement, 
    already an accepted industry practice, a legal alternative.
    
    Small Entities
    
        Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we 
    considered whether this rule will have a significant economic impact on 
    a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities'' 
    comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are 
    independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, 
    and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
        This regulation will not add any additional costs to industry and 
    will give industry increased flexibility in vessel design and 
    construction. Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 
    605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a 
    substantial number of small entities. Comments submitted in response to 
    this finding will be evaluated under the criteria in the ``Regulatory 
    Information'' section of this preamble.
    
    Assistance for Small Entities
    
        In accordance with section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory 
    Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist 
    small entities in understanding this rule so that they can better 
    evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. 
    If your small business or organization is affected by this rule and you 
    have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, 
    please contact Mr. Peter Eareckson, Marine Safety Center, Coast Guard, 
    telephone 202-366-6441.
    
    Collection of Information
    
        This rule will call for no new collection of information under the 
    Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
    
    Federalism
    
        We have analyzed this rule under E.O. 12612 and have determined 
    that this rule does not have sufficient implications for federalism to 
    warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
    
    Unfunded Mandates Reform Act and Enhancing the Intergovernmental 
    Partnership
    
        The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) and 
    E.O. 12875, Enhancing the Intergovernmental Partnership, (58 FR 58093, 
    October 28, 1993) govern the issuance of Federal regulations that 
    require unfunded mandates. An unfunded mandate is a regulation that 
    requires a State, local, or tribal government or the private sector to 
    incur direct costs without the Federal Government's having first 
    provided the funds to pay those costs. This rule will not impose an 
    unfunded mandate.
    
    Taking of Private Property
    
        This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise 
    have taking implications under E.O. 12630, Governmental Actions and 
    Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights.
    
    Civil Justice Reform
    
        This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
    of E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminate 
    ambiguity, and reduce burden.
    
    Protection of Children
    
        We have analyzed this rule under E.O. 13045, Protection of Children 
    from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not an 
    economically significant rule and does not concern an environmental 
    risk to health or risk to safety that may disproportionately affect 
    children.
    
    Environment
    
        We considered the environmental impact of this rule and concluded 
    that, under figure 2-1, paragraphs (34)(d) and (e) of Commandant 
    Instruction M16475.lC, this rule is categorically excluded from further 
    environmental documentation. A ``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' 
    is available in the docket for inspection or copying where indicated 
    under ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 46 CFR Part 69
    
        Measurement standards, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, 
    Vessels.
        For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
    46 CFR part 69 as follows:
    
    PART 69--STANDARD MEASUREMENT SYSTEM EXEMPTION FROM GROSS TONNAGE
    
        1. The authority citation for part 69 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 46 U.S.C. 2301, 14103; 49 CFR 1.46.
    
        2. In Sec. 69.117--
        a. In paragraph (d)(2) introductory text, remove the words 
    ``paragraph (d)(4)'' and add, in their place, the words ``paragraphs 
    (d)(4), (d)(5), and (d)(6)'';
        b. Revise paragraph (d)(4) to read as follows;
        c. Redesignate paragraph (d)(5) as paragraph (d)(7);
        d. Add new paragraphs (d)(5) and (d)(6) to read as follows; and
        e. In paragraph (e)(3), remove the words ``paragraph (d)(4)'' and 
    add, in their place, the words ``paragraphs (d)(4), (d)(5), and 
    (d)(6)'':
    
    
    Sec. 69.117  Spaces exempt from inclusion in gross tonnage.
    
    * * * * *
        (d) * * *
        (4) An interior or exterior opening that is temporarily closed by 
    shifting boards dropped into channel sections at the sides of the 
    opening is considered open to the weather if battening, caulking, or 
    gaskets of any material are not used.
        (5) An interior or exterior opening that is temporarily closed by 
    cover plates or boards held in place only by hook bolts (see 
    Sec. 69.123, Figure 12) is considered open to the weather--
        (i) If hook bolts used to secure cover plates or boards are spaced 
    at least one foot apart and hook over a stiffener installed around the 
    perimeter of the opening;
        (ii) If the cover plates or boards fit tightly against the 
    bulkhead; and
        (iii) If battening, caulking, or gaskets of any material are not 
    used.
        (6) An interior or exterior opening that is temporarily closed by 
    cover plates or boards held in place only by bolts and crosspieces is 
    considered open to the weather--
        (i) If the bolts are not installed through the bulkhead;
        (ii) If the bolts and crosspieces are not held in place by cleats 
    or other attachments to or through the bulkhead;
        (iii) If the cover plates or boards fit tightly against the 
    bulkhead; and
        (iv) If battening, caulking, or gaskets of any material are not 
    used.
    * * * * *
    
        Dated: August 19, 1999.
    Joseph J. Angelo,
    Director of Standards, Marine Safety and Environmental Protection.
    [FR Doc. 99-22213 Filed 8-30-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
11/29/1999
Published:
08/31/1999
Department:
Coast Guard
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Direct final rule.
Document Number:
99-22213
Dates:
This rule is effective November 29, 1999, unless a written adverse comment, or written notice of intent to submit an adverse comment, reaches the Docket Management Facility on or before November 1, 1999. If an adverse comment, or notice of intent to submit an adverse comment, is received, the Coast Guard will withdraw this direct final rule and publish a timely notice of withdrawal in the Federal Register.
Pages:
47402-47404 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
USCG-1999-5118
RINs:
2115-AF76: Standard Measurement System Exemption From Gross Tonnage (USCG-1999-5118)
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2115-AF76/standard-measurement-system-exemption-from-gross-tonnage-uscg-1999-5118-
PDF File:
99-22213.pdf
CFR: (2)
46 CFR 69.117
46 CFR 69.123