94-19008. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change by the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board Relating to Reports of Sales or Purchases, and Procedures for Reporting Inter-dealer Transactions Pursuant to Rule G-14  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 149 (Thursday, August 4, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-19008]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: August 4, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Release No. 34-34458; File No. SR-MSRB-94-9]
    
     
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule 
    Change by the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board Relating to Reports 
    of Sales or Purchases, and Procedures for Reporting Inter-dealer 
    Transactions Pursuant to Rule G-14
    
    July 28, 1994.
        Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
    (``Act''), 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1), notice is hereby given that on June 20, 
    1994, the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (``Board'' or ``MSRB'') 
    filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'' or 
    ``SEC'') a proposed rule change (File No. SR-MSRB-94-9). The proposed 
    rule change is described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items 
    have been prepared by the Board. The Commission is publishing this 
    notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested 
    persons.
    
    I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
    of the Proposed Rule Change
    
        The Board is filing a proposal to amend Board rule G-14, concerning 
    reports of sales or purchases, and procedures for reporting inter-
    dealer transactions (hereafter collectively referred to as ``the 
    proposed rule change'').\1\ The proposed rule change states that it is 
    the duty of brokers, dealers and municipal securities dealers to report 
    transactions in municipal securities to the Board or its designee, and 
    describes procedures for reporting.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\The Commission notes that the MSRB intends to enact the 
    proposed rule change, in its entirely, as a temporary pilot program 
    to be in place for a minimum of one year. Telephone conversation 
    between Larry M. Lawrence, Policy and Technology Advisor, MSRB, and 
    Betsy Prout, Staff Attorney, Commission, on July 27, 1994.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
    of the Proposed Rule Change
    
        In its filing with the Commission, the Board included statements 
    concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
    discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
    texts of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
    Item IV below. The Board has prepared summaries, set forth in Section 
    (A), (B), and (C) below, of the most significant aspects of such 
    statements.
    
    A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
    (a) Purpose
        The purpose of the proposed rule change is to achieve a certain 
    degree of transparency in the municipal securities market in a cost-
    effective manner by collecting and disseminating information on inter-
    dealer transactions. Under the proposed rule change, aggregate data 
    about market activity and certain volume and price information about 
    frequently traded securities would be disseminated to promote investor 
    confidence in the market and its pricing mechanisms. In addition, all 
    transaction information collected would be made available to regulatory 
    agencies responsible for enforcement of Board rules as a means to 
    assist in the inspection for compliance with, and the enforcement of, 
    Board rules.
        The proposed rule change is a first step to increase transparency 
    in the municipal securities market. After gaining experience with the 
    collection and dissemination of inter-dealer transactions, the Board's 
    future steps would include adding institutional and retail customer 
    information, and moving toward the ultimate goal of making available 
    transaction information that is both comprehensive and contemporaneous.
        Background. The municipal securities market has grown dramatically 
    in recent years. At the same time, retail investors have entered the 
    market in increasing numbers. These factors have increased the need for 
    access to information on municipal securities trading in the market, 
    including information which may help to establish more accurate 
    valuation of individual municipal securities.\2\ Recognizing this need, 
    the Board has adopted long-term goals and priorities for action, among 
    which is the goal of providing market participants with more 
    information about the value of securities.\3\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \2\For a more general discussion of the evolution of the 
    municipal securities market, see MSRB, Report of the Municipal 
    Securities Rulemaking Board on Regulation of the Municipal 
    Securities Market (September 1993), at 19-27.
        \3\See, e.g., ``From the Chairman,'' MSRB Reports, Vol. 8, No. 5 
    (December 1988), at 2.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Similarly, the staff of the Division of Market Regulation of the 
    Commission has stated:
    
        The Staff believes that the degree of transparency in the 
    municipal securities market is not adequate, and should be increased 
    to better inform investors in their dealings with broker-dealers and 
    to make the market more efficient.\4\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\SEC, Division of Market Regulation, Staff Report on the 
    Municipal Securities Market (September 1993) (``Staff Report''), at 
    36.
    
        In the equities markets, quotations, trade prices and volumes are 
    reported publicly for all securities listed on the exchanges and in the 
    National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation 
    (``Nasdaq'') System. The Commission has noted at least three benefits 
    to the equities markets from transparency: enhanced investor 
    protection, market liquidity, and market efficiency.\5\ The Board 
    believes that these same benefits would be desirable in the municipal 
    securities market.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \5\SEC, Division of Market Regulation, Market 2000: An 
    Examination of Current Equity Market Developments (January 1994), at 
    IV-2.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Pilot Program for Transaction Reporting. In 1993, the Board 
    announced its plan to undertake a pilot program to collect and publish 
    information on transactions occurring in the inter-dealer market for 
    municipal securities (the ``pilot program''). The Board has designed 
    the pilot program to take into account the distinctive aspects of the 
    municipal securities market that distinguish it from the exchange-
    listed and Nasdaq markets. A primary distinguishing characteristic of 
    the municipal securities market is the large number of outstanding 
    issues. There are approximately 1.2 million municipal securities that 
    are distinct, non-fungible entities for purposes of trading and 
    reporting. In addition, the municipal securities market lacks any core 
    group of issues that trade frequently and consistently over sustained 
    periods of time. While, on any given day, a certain number of municipal 
    securities are traded frequently, the identity of these frequently 
    traded issues is continually changing over time. A third distinguishing 
    characteristic is that, in the municipal securities market, most issues 
    are purchased by ``buy and hold'' investors relatively quickly after 
    initial issuance. When frequent trading does occur in an issue, it 
    generally occurs immediately after issuance and then subsides within a 
    week to 10 days.\6\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \6\The Board has examined inter-dealer trading data provided by 
    the National Securities Clearing Corporation (``NSCC'') for a six-
    month period during 1991. During this six-month period, only 40 
    issues traded three or more times per day for a minimum of 10 
    consecutive business days. It is important to note that these 40 
    issues did not trade frequently for the entire six-month period and 
    that, on any given day, only a few of the 40 would be trading 
    frequently. In most cases, frequent trading in these issues--
    primarily new issues--tended to trail off shortly after a 10-day 
    run. Altogether, approximately 75 percent of all issues trading 
    during the six-month period were traded only once or twice in a 
    given week.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In the markets covered by Nasdaq and the National Association of 
    Securities Dealer's (``NASD's'') recently inaugurated Fixed Income 
    Pricing System (``FIPS'') for high-yield fixed-income corporate 
    securities,\7\ displays of data about a security are organized based on 
    firm quotations. The Board believes that a different concept is needed 
    for municipal securities, since firm two-sided quotations exist only 
    for very few municipal securities at any given time. There are several 
    reasons for this. For most municipal securities, there is only a small 
    ``float'' of securities available to be the subject of trading. This 
    small ``float'' is a primary disincentive to market making. In 
    addition, the tax treatment of borrowing tax-exempt securities (along 
    with the small floats) effectively prevents short-sales of an issue. 
    This denies potential market makers a technique that otherwise could be 
    used to manage risks. Finally, the traditional ``buy and hold'' 
    philosophy of most tax-exempt purchasers simply does to provide the 
    incentive or create the need for continuous, two-sided quotations 
    traditionally offered by market makers in equity securities.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \7\See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 32019 (March 19, 
    1993), 58 FR 12428.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Board has designed the transaction reporting pilot program to 
    provide the public with price and volume information in a way that 
    reflects the unique aspects of the municipal securities market. The 
    pilot program will make information available in the form of a daily, 
    public report containing volume and pricing information for the inter-
    dealer market (``daily report''). The issues that will be reported 
    individually each day will be those that traded at or above a threshold 
    number of times on the previous business day. Initially the threshold 
    will be four trades per day. As trading in an issue increases, it will 
    be reported; as an issue's trading frequency decreases, it will be 
    replaced by others that are trading frequently. In this way, the daily 
    report will reflect the ever-changing pattern of trading activity in 
    the universe of some 1.2 million municipal securities. The pilot 
    program will make information on all inter-dealer trades in municipal 
    securities available to the Commission and other regulatory agencies to 
    assist in the inspection for compliance with and the enforcement of 
    Board rules.
        Requirement to Report. There is currently no affirmative 
    requirement for public reporting of transactions in municipal 
    securities. In its present form, the Board's rule G-14 does not require 
    the reporting of transactions in municipal securities, but does require 
    that any such report represent a legitimate trade. The rule requires a 
    dealer that distributes or publishes a report of a transaction in a 
    municipal security to know or have reason to believe that the 
    transaction was actually effected and to have no reason to believe that 
    the transaction was fictitious or in furtherance of any fraudulent, 
    misleading or deceptive purpose.
        The proposed rule change would impose a duty upon dealers to report 
    inter-dealer transaction information to the Board or its designee. It 
    states that such information would be used to make public reports and 
    would be provided to the Commission, the NASD, and bank regulatory 
    organizations charged with enforcing Board rules, i.e., the Comptroller 
    of the Currency in the case of national banks, the Board of Governors 
    of the Federal Reserve System in the case of state member banks of the 
    Federal Reserve System, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 
    (``FDIC'') in the case of other banks insured by the FDIC.
        Reporting Procedures. Brokers, dealers and municipal securities 
    dealers would report transactions under Rule G-14 Transaction Reporting 
    Procedures, which are also part of the proposed rule change. The 
    transaction reporting procedures designate the NSCC as the Board's 
    agent to receive transaction information. NSCC is a clearing agency 
    registered with the Commission under Section 17A of the Act and is the 
    central facility for automated comparison processing for inter-dealer 
    municipal securities transactions. Automated comparison is the process 
    by which each party to an inter-dealer trade ensures that its contra-
    party knows the terms of the trade and will be ready to settle, on 
    those terms, on settlement date. In general, the automated comparison 
    process requires each dealer in a transaction to submit information on 
    a trade (e.g., price, quantity, contra-party) to a comparison system 
    operated by a clearing agency registered with the Commission. This 
    information is then matched (``compared'') by computer in the 
    comparison system and the results reported back to each dealer.
        Currently, pursuant to the Board's rule G-12(f)(i), dealers must 
    use the facilities of a registered clearing agency to compare all 
    inter-dealer transactions in securities with CUSIP numbers. Since NSCC 
    and all other registered clearing agencies offering municipal 
    securities comparison services are linked by automated interfaces, it 
    will be possible for transactions to be submitted to NSCC by submitting 
    them to any such clearing agency. Accordingly, the proposed procedures 
    state that dealers may provide transaction information to NSCC or any 
    other registered clearing agency linked with NSCC for the purpose of 
    automated comparison. Dealers may submit transaction information 
    directly or through an agent that is a member of the registered 
    clearing agency.\8\ Thus, under the proposed rule change, dealers would 
    not be required to submit transaction data to a separate reporting 
    system and should not incur additional operational costs to fulfill 
    their reporting obligations.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \8\These are the same procedures currently used to submit 
    information for automated comparison.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        With one exception, NSCC automated comparison procedures require 
    both the purchasing and selling dealers to submit information about the 
    trade. Thus, the proposed reporting procedures require transaction 
    information to be submitted by both parties. For transactions involving 
    the distribution of new issue securities from a syndicate manager to 
    syndicate members, however, NSCC comparison procedures require only a 
    submission from the syndicate manager. The proposed procedures allow 
    for the same ``one-sided'' submission of information for public 
    reporting.
        The comparison process requires various data elements to be 
    submitted with regard to each transaction. The proposed transaction 
    reporting program makes an identical requirement for these data items. 
    The following transaction information will be collected by the Board 
    through NSCC:
    
    Identification of seller
    Identification of buyer
    Trade date
    CUSIP number of security traded
    Trade type (e.g., syndicate takedown, new issue or regular way)
    Par value (quantity) traded
    Price, in one of the following formats:
        Dollar price of security
        ``Final money'' (total dollar amount of the transaction)
        Yield or basis of concession, if any
    Settlement date, if not ``regular way''
    
        As noted above, dealers already are required to provide this 
    information to a registered clearing agency as part of the automated 
    comparison process required under rule G-12(f)(i). Currently, the 
    accrued interest is an optional data element for the purpose of the 
    automated comparison process, ie., it can be submitted, but is not 
    required to match or compare a transaction. However, accrued interest 
    will be a mandatory submission for the purpose of transaction reporting 
    pursuant to the Rule G-14 Transaction Reporting Procedures. This 
    requirement is necessary for accurate computation of dollar price in 
    certain circumstances (see ``Price Computation,'' infra).
        Timing. In the current comparison cycle, dealers submit required 
    information to a registered clearing agency by the evening of trade 
    date (``T''). NSCC, as the central facilities provider for the 
    comparison system, accepts this submitted data, compares the 
    submissions of the parties on the night of T and reports the results 
    back to the dealers on T+1. Trades that are successfully compared on T 
    will be the basis of the daily report produced by the Board's proposed 
    program. Accordingly, trades that are not successfully compared on the 
    night of the trade will not be subject to reporting on T+1.\9\ As an 
    indication of the reliability of the data in the daily report, the 
    percentage of submissions that were successfully compared (``comparison 
    rate'') will be shown in each day's report.\10\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \9\It was determined to use data for compared trades rather than 
    data for both compared and uncompared trades because the compared 
    data is more reliable than uncompared data. If uncompared data were 
    reported, this might cause the daily report to include erroneous 
    prices or to include duplicate trades. Uncompared submissions 
    eventually are resolved as trades or as mistakes. Those that are 
    resolved as trades will be entered in the transaction reporting 
    database after T+1 and thus will be made available to the 
    enforcement agencies.
        \10\ The Board has previously stated its concern about the need 
    to increase the comparison rate to obtain improvements as a 
    prerequisite to implementing T+3 settlement for municipal 
    securities.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Daily Report. The daily report will be provided to subscribers 
    for public use by approximately 6:00 a.m. on T+1. This will make the 
    data available prior to the beginning of trading activity. The daily 
    report will be available both as a computer-readable file and as a 
    printed report. The computer-readable file will be electronically 
    disseminated by an automated interface between Board computers and 
    those of subscribers or by magnetic tape delivered by a courier 
    service.
        The Daily Report. The daily report will include aggregate 
    information for each day of trade, as follows:
        (i) Total par value traded;
        (ii) Total number of compared transactions; and
        (iii) Total number of issues traded (i.e., the number of different 
    CUSIP numbers that were involved in compared transactions on that day).
        In addition to the aggregate data, the daily report will contain 
    price and volume information about certain municipal securities that 
    were ``frequently traded'' on that day. The Board believes that it 
    would be appropriate to report issue-specific information only if four 
    or more transactions in the issue are reported as compared on a given 
    day. Using this threshold and based on recent levels of market 
    activity, the Board anticipates that the daily list of frequently 
    traded issues normally will range between 80 to 350 issues, with an 
    average of about 180 issues each day. The size and composition of the 
    list obviously would vary from day to day, depending upon market 
    activity in specific cases.
        The information in the daily report about each ``frequently 
    traded'' security will include:
        (i) The CUSIP number and security's description;
        (ii) The total number of transactions in the security and total 
    volume traded;
        (iii) The highest and lowest prices of transactions in the 
    security; and
        (iv) ``Average price'' information, i.e., the number of 
    transactions in the security involving par values between $100,000 and 
    $1,000,000 inclusive, and the average price of those transactions.
        The Board will provide a statement to be included in the report 
    pointing out that (a) the daily report represents only those inter-
    dealer transactions that have been submitted for comparison and that 
    actually were compared on the previous day and (b) reported prices are 
    affected by various factors such as transaction size. This statement is 
    intended to ensure that readers unfamiliar with the municipal 
    securities market do not misinterpret the daily report.
        Price Computation. Municipal securities transactions are sometimes 
    executed on a dollar price basis and sometimes executed on a yield 
    basis. The Board has chosen to use dollar price as the uniform 
    expression of ``price'' in the daily report to simplify reporting 
    procedures. In cases where dollar price is submitted for comparison, 
    that dollar price, as compared by the comparison system, will be used 
    in the daily report. In certain cases the security ``price'' for the 
    daily report will need to be computed from other submitted data. For 
    example, current procedures required for automated comparison allow the 
    submission of par value and ``final money'' (total dollar amount of the 
    transaction) to achieve comparison. The proposed Rule G-14 Transaction 
    Reporting Procedures provide that the dealers will submit the amount of 
    accrued interest in the trade to allow for computation of dollar price 
    in these cases. The following formula will be used:
    
    Dollar price = (Final money--Accrued interest) / Par value
    
        For ``when, as if issued'' trades submitted for comparison on a 
    yield basis, final money will be computed and a dollar price similarly 
    derived if a settlement date is known. For yield transactions whose 
    settlement date is not known, an assumed settlement date will be used. 
    The assumed settlement date will be 20 business days from the first 
    trade date on which that issue is submitted for comparison. On the 
    daily report, a note will be added to the trade information stating 
    that an assumed settlement date was used to compute the dollar price in 
    the trade and showing the date used. Once the actual settlement date is 
    known to NSCC, it will be used and noted as such when the issue is next 
    included on a daily report.
        Fees and Costs. Subscription fees, estimated production costs for 
    the daily report, and further technical details of the pilot program 
    will be provided in a subsequent filing prior to beginning operation of 
    the facility.
        Surveillance and Enforcement Uses of Pilot Program Information. In 
    addition to public reporting, the proposed rule change would make 
    transaction data available to the regulatory organizations charged with 
    enforcing Board rules. Commenting on the need for better information in 
    this area, the Commission's staff stated:
    
        In the Staff's view, a central flaw in the present regulatory 
    system is the lack of an integrated audit trail in the municipal 
    securities market of the type that exists in the stock and options 
    markets. Because of the limited pricing information available in the 
    secondary market for many thinly traded municipal securities, it is 
    extremely difficult for the NASD to assess the fairness of the 
    prices being charged retail customers by municipal securities 
    broker-dealers. The Staff believes that the MSRB, the NASD, and the 
    banking agencies should work to create a cost-effective trade 
    reporting system that will provide the regulators with an integrated 
    audit trail of municipal securities and result in improved 
    surveillance for all segments of the market. The development of such 
    an audit trail would increase the NASD's ability to examine and 
    enforce the existing customer protection rules of the Commission and 
    the NASD.\11\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \11\Staff Report, supra note 4, and 37.
    
        The transaction reporting pilot program will result in a 
    centralized data base of trade information that is expected to improve 
    the efficiency and effectiveness of inspection for compliance with and 
    the enforcement of Board rules. All compared trades will be made 
    available to these regulatory organizations, including those that 
    compare after trade date and those not frequently traded. Comprehensive 
    information will be made available, including identification of parties 
    to each trade and the prices of all securities traded.
        The information to be made available through the pilot program will 
    enable enforcement agencies to identify transaction patterns to detect 
    market manipulation and other anomalies. It will also assist regulators 
    in determining the market value of securities as they assess compliance 
    with the Board's rule G-30 on fair and reasonable prices and 
    commissions. The Board is working with the NASD and the bank regulatory 
    organizations to ensure that the pilot system's outputs will meet their 
    requirements for surveillance of the municipal securities market and 
    enforcement of the Board's rules.
        The Board plans to evaluate expansion of the pilot program as 
    experience is gained and comments on program operations are received 
    from information users and the industry. The Board's first 
    consideration will be how the daily report and surveillance mechanisms 
    could be improved by including institutional customer transaction data 
    and information on the time of trade. During this evaluation, the 
    Board's goal will be not only to enhance the information contained in 
    the daily report, but also to find cost-effective methods for providing 
    even greater levels of transparency to the market, particularly with 
    respect to customer transactions and the dissemination of transaction 
    price information on a more contemporaneous basis.
        Effect of Proposed Rule Change upon Dealers. Dealers should 
    experience minimal operational impact from the proposed rule change, 
    since, as mentioned above, they are now required, pursuant to the 
    Board's rule G-12(f)(i), to use the facilities of a registered clearing 
    agency for the automated comparison of transactions. The transaction 
    data submitted by dealers for comparison will be used by the 
    transaction reporting pilot program. Thus, under the proposed program, 
    dealers would not have to submit transaction data to a separate 
    reporting system and should not incur additional operational costs.
    (b) Statutory Basis
        The Board believes the proposed rule change is consistent with 
    Section 15B(b)(2)(C) of the Act, which requires, in pertinent part, 
    that the Board's rules be designed:
    
    * * * to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free 
    and open market in municipal securities, and, in general, to protect 
    investors and the public interest * * *.
    
        The transaction reporting pilot program will make it possible to 
    provide pricing reports to all market participants and to the public. 
    The availability of this information is expected to support market 
    integrity, increase investor confidence, improve pricing efficiency and 
    increase liquidity in the market.
    
    B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
    
        The Board does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
    impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in 
    furtherance of the purpose of the Act, since it would apply equally to 
    all brokers, dealers and municipal securities dealers.
    
    C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
    Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
    
        In May 1993 the Board published a notice explaining its plan to 
    collect inter-dealer transaction data by using information required for 
    automated comparison, clearance and settlement. The notice set forth 
    the proposed method of collection inter-dealer transaction data and of 
    publishing it. The Board received four comments of which two supported 
    the proposed pilot program and made suggestions for expansion. The 
    remaining two commenters suggested certain modifications of the daily 
    report format and the selection criteria for reported issues without 
    expressing general support or opposition.
        Sample Format for Daily Report. One commenter noted that the 
    reporting of transaction data by the Board should include a statement 
    stating that prices change with market conditions and that prices for 
    individual transactions may depend upon factors such as size of 
    transaction, interest rate, maturity date, and call features. Another 
    commenter stated that the daily report should note that the data 
    represents transactions that have been submitted for comparison. The 
    Board agrees that statements similar to those requested by the 
    commenters should be included on or with the daily reports to help 
    clarify the meaning of the data to the general public and has decided 
    to include such statements on the daily report. The Board also plans to 
    ask recipients of the daily report who intend to publish it for a 
    general audience also to include such statements in their publications.
        Average Price Calculation. One commenter suggested widening the 
    band used for average price calculation to include more price 
    information. In contrast, another commenter suggested narrowing the 
    band to exclude some trades that might be considered ``odd lots'' 
    (certain zero-coupon bond trades reported by NSCC on the basis of 
    maturity value).
        The Board believes that it is appropriate to use the band from 
    $100,000 to $1 million for average price calculations for initial 
    production of the daily report. Once the program goes into operation 
    and feedback is received from data users, it will be possible to judge 
    how well the ``average price'' concept actually works in practice. As 
    experience is gained, the price band concept will be reviewed to 
    determine whether it is serving its intended purpose of indicating a 
    ``typical'' inter-dealer market price. The pilot program's computer 
    system will be designed to enable the parameters of the price band to 
    be changed easily and quickly.
        Compilations of Data. One commenter urged the Board to provide 
    compilations of transaction data (e.g., a month of data on a computer 
    disk) to facilitate study of the data by academics. The Board has 
    decided not to make such compilations available at the beginning of the 
    pilot program, but may do so in the future.
        Information on Daily Reports. One commenter suggested that the 
    Board publish individual transaction data (CUSIP number, description, 
    par value, price) for each transaction, without regard to whether a 
    security is being frequently traded on a specific day. This commenter 
    believes that, by limiting reporting to individual maturities of an 
    issue that are trading frequently, the program would withhold 
    information that, in the aggregate, would be useful. For example, the 
    commenter believes that the general price levels for prerefunded 
    securities could be extracted from aggregate transaction data on 
    prerefunded securities, even when no one prerefunded security is 
    trading frequently.
        The Board believes that reporting an isolated transaction in a 
    security does not necessarily provide a reliable indicator of ``market 
    price'' and might be misleading to an observer not familiar with the 
    market. Nevertheless, after the pilot program begins operation and 
    experience is obtained, the Board will review the use of the daily 
    report and consider expanding the information included to accommodate 
    requests from information users and the industry.
    
    III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
    Commission Action
    
        Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the 
    Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may 
    designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to 
    be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
    which the MSRB consents, the Commission will:
        (A) By order approve such proposed rule change, or
        (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
    change should be disapproved.
    
    IV. Solicitation of Comments
    
        Interested people are invited to submit written data, views, and 
    arguments concerning the foregoing. People making written submissions 
    should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and 
    Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549. 
    Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
    statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
    the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
    rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
    that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
    of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the 
    Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of the filing will also be 
    available for inspection and copying at the Board's principal offices. 
    All submissions should refer to File No. SR-MSRB-94-9 and should be 
    submitted by August 25, 1994.
    
        For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority, 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 94-19008 Filed 8-3-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/04/1994
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-19008
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: August 4, 1994, Release No. 34-34458, File No. SR-MSRB-94-9