95-19242. Procurement List Additions  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 150 (Friday, August 4, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 39945-39946]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-19242]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED
    
    Procurement List Additions
    
    AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
    Disabled.
    
    ACTION: Additions to the procurement list.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This action adds to the Procurement List hardwood flag cases 
    to be furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons who are blind 
    or have other severe disabilities.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: September 5, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
    Disabled, Crystal Square 3, Suite 403, 1735 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
    Arlington, Virginia 22202-3461.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Milkman (703) 603-7740
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 2, 1995, the Committee for Purchase 
    From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled published notice (60 FR 
    28781) of proposed addition to the Procurement List.
        Comments were received from the current contractor for the flag 
    cases, both Senators from North Carolina, two other members of the 
    State's Congressional delegation, the State's Department of Commerce 
    and its Small Business & Technology Development Center, a county 
    commissioner for one North Carolina county, and the Chambers of 
    Commerce of two other counties. Many of the commenters expressed 
    concern that loss of sales of the flag cases proposed to be added to 
    the Procurement List could severely affect the current contractor, 
    which is a startup business that has not yet shown a profit from its 
    activities to develop its flag case business and is located in an area 
    classified as ``severely economically distressed.''
        The majority of the current contractor's Government sales of the 
    flag cases are to the Army, Air Force, or exchange system. The 
    Committee proposes to add only the Navy and Marine Corps requirements 
    to the Procurement List. These requirements comprise less than five 
    percent of the contractor's business, and the contractor has been 
    selling the cases to the Navy and Marine Corps for less than a year. 
    The Committee does not normally consider an impact of this size to be 
    severe adverse impact, particularly when the contractor does not have a 
    long-term dependence on sales of the item to the affected customer.
        Nevertheless, some of the commenters have indicated that even a 
    sales loss of this lesser size would have a severe impact on the 
    contractor, given its current profitability status, and particularly on 
    its subsidiary which makes the cases and on the county in which the 
    subsidiary is located if the subsidiary is forced to close. They 
    contend that the contractor must continue to expand its business in 
    order to become profitable, so it cannot afford to lose any part of its 
    current sales or prospects, and it would not be fair for it to lose the 
    fruits of its business development efforts.
        The contractor is currently selling the flag cases to the 
    Government under the competitive purchasing system. In this system, no 
    contractor is guaranteed that it will continue to receive Government 
    contracts. Any company desiring to do business with the Government thus 
    risks the loss of any expenditure of money or effort it makes in order 
    to obtain this business. In addition, the Government's needs may change 
    so that it would no longer buy the type of flag case that the 
    contractor sells. Until last year, in fact, the Navy and Marine Corps 
    bought a different type of flag case for the same purpose. Addition of 
    the Navy and Marine Corps requirements for the case to the Procurement 
    List is thus not the only way the contractor can lose this business.
        The Committee does not believe that the proposed addition will 
    cause the contractor to close its subsidiary and impact the local 
    economy as some of the commenters have indicated. In its initial 
    comment, the contractor indicated that loss of its entire Government 
    flag case business would only cause the loss of two sales positions and 
    a possible closing of the subsidiary. Since the amount being added to 
    the Procurement List is only one-fifth of the contractor's Government 
    flag case business, it appears unlikely that the impact would force the 
    subsidiary's closing. To the extent that the Committee's action causes 
    losses to the contractor or its employees, the Committee believes the 
    losses are outweighed by the creation of jobs for people with severe 
    disabilities, whose overall unemployment rate exceeds 65 percent, well 
    above the rate for nondisabled workers in the contractor's locality.
        One commenter expressed a fear that the Committee would expand its 
    share of the Government market for the flag case beyond the Navy and 
    Marine Corps requirements, causing a greater impact on the contractor. 
    The Committee could not do that without conducting a separate 
    rulemaking proceeding to add the additional quantities to the 
    Procurement List. In that proceeding, the Committee would be required 
    to consider the cumulative impact on the contractor caused by both 
    addition actions. Unless the contractor's business fortunes had 
    improved markedly, it is unlikely the Committee would add any further 
    part of the contractor's Government sales of the flag case to the 
    Procurement List.
        The same commenter indicated that making flag cases is dangerous 
    work, and questioned the ability of the designated nonprofit agency to 
    produce the flag cases at a competitive price and in sufficient 
    quantity to meet wartime requirements. As the Navy official who 
    conducted the plant inspection noted in finding the nonprofit agency 
    capable of meeting all Navy and Marine Corps supply requirements, the 
    nonprofit agency has a fully equipped commercial woodworking operation, 
    with machines which have been specially designed to allow people with 
    disabilities to operate them safely. The Committee is required to set a 
    fair market price for each item on the Procurement List, and the 
    
    [[Page 39946]]
    nonprofit agency has agreed to produce the flag cases at the price that 
    has been set.
        Another commenter indicated that the contractor's firm may have 
    disabled employees. The contractor, however, did not support this 
    contention in its comments either to the Committee or in its letters to 
    Members of Congress. One commenter proposed that the Committee permit 
    the contractor to hire some people with disabilities instead of 
    adopting the proposed addition to the Procurement List. The Committee 
    encourages companies to hire people with disabilities but does not 
    believe this hiring should replace the creation of jobs for people with 
    severe disabilities through additions to the Procurement List, which 
    guarantees employment for these people while commercial businesses are 
    free to terminate workers with disabilities for any reason.
        After consideration of the material presented to it concerning 
    capability of qualified nonprofit agencies to provide the commodities, 
    fair market price, and impact of the addition on the current or most 
    recent contractors, the Committee has determined that the commodities 
    listed below are suitable for procurement by the Federal Government 
    under 41 U.S.C. 46-48c and 41 CFR 51-2.4.
        I certify that the following action will not have a significant 
    impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors 
    considered for this certification were:
        1. The action will not result in any additional reporting, 
    recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities other 
    than the small organizations that will furnish the commodities to the 
    Government.
        2. The action does not appear to have a severe economic impact on 
    current contractors for the commodities.
        3. The action will result in authorizing small entities to furnish 
    the commodities to the Government.
        4. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
    accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46-
    48c) in connection with the commodities proposed for addition to the 
    Procurement List.
        Accordingly, the following commodities are hereby added to the 
    Procurement List:
    
    Case, Flag, Hardwood
    8345-00-NSH-0013 (18'' x 25'' Navy)
        8345-00-NSH-0014 (18'' x 25'' Marine Corps)
        (Requirements for the Naval Medical Logistics Command, Fort 
    Detrick, Maryland)
    
        This action does not affect current contracts awarded prior to the 
    effective date of this addition or options exercised under those 
    contracts.
    Beverly L. Milkman,
    Executive Director.
    [FR Doc. 95-19242 Filed 8-3-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6820-33-P
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
9/5/1995
Published:
08/04/1995
Department:
Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Additions to the procurement list.
Document Number:
95-19242
Dates:
September 5, 1995.
Pages:
39945-39946 (2 pages)
PDF File:
95-19242.pdf