[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 149 (Tuesday, August 4, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41580-41581]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-20707]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 97E-0292]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; AQUEOUS ARYL FLUOROPHOSPHITE SUSPENSION
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the
regulatory review period for AQUEOUS ARYL FLUOROPHOSPHITE SUSPENSION
and is publishing this notice of that determination as required by law.
FDA has made the determination because of the submission of an
application to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Department
of Commerce, for the extension of a patent which claims that food
additive.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and petitions should be directed to the
Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian J. Malkin, Office of Health
Affairs (HFY-20), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-6620.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug
and Patent Term Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100-670) generally provide
that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as
the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical
device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For food additives, the testing
phase begins when a major health or environmental effects test
involving the food additive begins and runs until the approval phase
begins. The approval phase starts with the initial submission of a
petition requesting the issuance of a regulation for use of the food
additive and continues until FDA grants permission to market the food
additive product. Although only a portion of a regulatory review period
may count toward the actual amount of extension that the Commissioner
of Patents and Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing
phase must be subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred
before the patent was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a
regulatory review period for a food additive will include all of the
testing phase and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(2)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing the food additive AQUEOUS ARYL
FLUOROPHOSPHITE SUSPENSION (2,2'-ethylidenebis(4,6-di-
tertbutylpheny)fluorophosphonite). AQUEOUS ARYL FLUOROPHOSPHITE
SUSPENSION is used as an antioxidant in adhesives and in the
preparation of polymers intended for contact with food. Subsequent to
this approval, the Patent and Trademark Office received a patent term
restoration application for AQUEOUS ARYL FLUOROPHOSPHITE SUSPENSION
(U.S. Patent No. 4,867,907) from Albemarle Corp., and the Patent and
Trademark Office requested FDA's assistance in determining this
patent's eligibility for patent term restoration. In a letter dated
October 21, 1997, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark Office that this
food additive had undergone a regulatory review period and that the
approval of AQUEOUS ARYL FLUOROPHOSPHITE SUSPENSION represented the
first permitted commercial marketing or use of the product. Shortly
thereafter, the Patent and Trademark Office requested that FDA
determine the product's regulatory review period.
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
AQUEOUS ARYL FLUOROPHOSPHITE SUSPENSION is 2,930 days. Of this time,
935 days occurred during the testing phase of the regulatory review
period, 1,995 days occurred during the approval phase. These periods of
time were derived from the following dates:
1. The date a major health or environmental effects test was begun:
January 9, 1989. The applicant claims July 21, 1986, as the date the
test was begun. However, FDA records indicate that the test was begun
on January 9, 1989.
[[Page 41581]]
2. The date the petition requesting the issuance of a regulation
for use of the food additive under section 409 of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 348) was initially submitted: August
1, 1991. The applicant claims August 1, 1991, as the date the petition
for AQUEOUS ARYL FLUOROPHOSPHITE SUSPENSION was initially submitted.
3. The date the regulation for the food additive petition became
effective: January 15, 1997. FDA has verified the applicant's claim
that the regulation for the food additive became effective on January
15, 1997.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in
its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its
application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 1,268 days of
patent term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published is
incorrect may, on or before October 5, 1998, submit to the Dockets
Management Branch (address above) written comments and ask for a
redetermination. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA,
on or before February 1, 1999, for a determination regarding whether
the applicant for extension acted with due diligence during the
regulatory review period. To meet its burden, the petition must contain
sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part
1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the
format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Dockets
Management Branch (address above) in three copies (except that
individuals may submit single copies) and identified with the docket
number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Comments and
petitions may be seen in the Dockets Management Branch between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: July 8, 1998.
Thomas J. McGinnis,
Deputy Associate Commissioner for Health Affairs.
[FR Doc. 98-20707 Filed 8-3-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
