98-20759. Final Decision That Certain Nonconforming Vehicles Are Eligible for Importation  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 149 (Tuesday, August 4, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 41617-41619]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-20759]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
    [Docket No. NHTSA-98-4079]
    
    
    Final Decision That Certain Nonconforming Vehicles Are Eligible 
    for Importation
    
    AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final decision that certain nonconforming vehicles are eligible 
    for importation.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document announces a final decision by the Administrator 
    of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) that 
    certain motor vehicles that are certified by their manufacturers as 
    complying with Canadian Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 208, Occupant 
    Restraint Systems, but do not comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety 
    Standard (FMVSS) No. 208, Occupant Crash Protection, are nevertheless 
    eligible for
    
    [[Page 41618]]
    
    importation into the United States because (1) they are substantially 
    similar to vehicles that were originally manufactured for sale in the 
    United States and that were certified by their manufacturers as 
    complying with the safety standards, and (2) they are capable of being 
    readily altered to conform to FMVSS No. 208.
    
    DATES: This decision is effective August 4, 1998.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Entwistle, Office of Vehicle 
    Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202-366-5306).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a motor vehicle that was not 
    originally manufactured to conform to all applicable Federal motor 
    vehicle safety standards (FMVSS) shall be refused admission into the 
    United States unless NHTSA has decided, either pursuant to a petition 
    from the manufacturer or registered importer or on its own initiative, 
    that the motor vehicle is substantially similar to a motor vehicle 
    originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United 
    States, certified under 49 U.S.C. Sec. 30115, and of the same model 
    year as the model of the motor vehicle to be compared, and is capable 
    of being readily altered to conform to all applicable Federal motor 
    vehicle safety standards.
        On May 10, 1996, NHTSA published a notice in the Federal Register 
    at 61 FR 21531, under Docket No. 98-39; Notice 1, announcing that the 
    agency had made a tentative decision that certain motor vehicles that 
    were certified by their manufacturers as complying with Canadian Motor 
    Vehicle Safety Standard No. 208, Occupant Restraint Systems, but that 
    do not comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 
    208, Occupant Crash Protection, are eligible for importation into the 
    United States. In an annex to the notice of tentative decision, these 
    vehicles were identified as the following passenger cars:
    
    1994 and 1995 Chrysler LeBaron
    1994 and 1995 Dodge Spirit
     1994 and 1995 Dodge Shadow
    1994 and 1995 Dodge Viper
    1994 and 1995 Plymouth Acclaim
    1994 and 1995 Plymouth Sundance
    1995 Mazda Protege.
    
    The reader is referred to that notice for a full discussion of the 
    factors leading to the tentative decision.
        In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 301412(b), the notice solicited public 
    comments on the tentative decision that NHTSA had made. Four comments 
    were submitted in response to the notice of tentative decision. The 
    first of these was submitted by Volkswagen of America, Inc. 
    (``Volkswagen''), on its own behalf, as well as that of Volkswagen AG 
    and Audi AG. In its comment, Volkswagen noted that it did not 
    manufacture any of the vehicles that were the subject of the tentative 
    decision, but construed the notice of that decision as soliciting 
    general comments on the issue of whether NHTSA should decide that 
    vehicles certified to Canadian standards that lack automatic restraint 
    systems required by FMVSS No. 208 are eligible for importation into the 
    United States. Volkswagen expressed the belief that the agency should 
    make no general decision in this regard, but instead address the issue 
    on a case by case basis, in its processing of import eligibility 
    petitions submitted by registered importers. Volkswagen stated that in 
    the case of its own carlines, Canadian certified vehicles equipped with 
    driver and passenger air bags incorporate a system that complies with 
    FMVSS No. 208. Volkswagen observed, however, that if the U.S. version 
    of the vehicle is equipped with motorized or non-motorized automatic 
    seat belts, modifications must be performed on the Canadian counterpart 
    that include structural and electric system changes and, in some cases, 
    seat track modifications, depending on the vehicle's model year and 
    date of production.
        The second comment was submitted by Mazda (North America), Inc. 
    (``Mazda''), which manufactured one of the vehicles to which the 
    tentative decision relates--the 1995 Mazda Protege. In its comment, 
    Mazda noted that it marketed two versions of the 1995 Protege in 
    Canada, only one of which was equipped with an air bag system. Mazda 
    stated that the air bags, seat belts, and steering shafts on these 
    vehicles have specifications that differ from those on U.S.-certified 
    models, and that it has never tested either version to the requirements 
    of FMVSS No. 208. Mazda noted that it also marketed in Canada a 1995 
    Protege S model, which it characterized as not complying with FMVSS No. 
    208 and incapable of being modified to comply with this standard. Mazda 
    stated that any such modifications would be ``extensive, complicated, 
    and invasive, and cannot be reliably or effectively performed.''
        The remaining two comments, from Norman G. Jensen, Inc. of 
    Alexandria Bay, New York, and Laurek International of Clayton, New 
    York, did not provide any information with respect to whether Canadian-
    certified vehicles that do not comply with FMVSS No. 208 are capable of 
    being readily altered to conform to that standard.
        With respect to the issues raised by Volkswagen and Mazda 
    concerning the extent of the modifications that are necessary to 
    conform some Canadian-certified vehicles to FMVSS No. 208, NHTSA 
    observes that over the years since an automatic restraint requirement 
    has been part of that standard, the agency has received, and granted, a 
    number of petitions from registered importers seeking import 
    eligibility decisions on vehicles requiring the installation or 
    replacement of automatic restraint systems to comply with FMVSS No. 
    208. See, e.g., import eligibility decisions at 61 FR 9004 (March 6, 
    1996) and 61 FR 6887 (February 22, 1996). These petitions were granted 
    on the basis of information demonstrating that automatic restraints 
    could be installed in the subject vehicles without the need for 
    significant structural modifications. As a result, the agency found 
    those vehicles capable of being readily altered to conform to the 
    standards, and therefore eligible for importation under the criteria 
    specified in 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A). Based on this experience, the 
    agency has concluded that notwithstanding Volkswagen's and Mazda's 
    comments, the vehicles subject to the tentative decision are eligible 
    for importation into the United States. NHTSA notes that the 1995 
    Protege S, which Mazda states is incapable of being modified to comply 
    with FMVSS No. 208, is a model distinct from the ``1995 Mazda Protege'' 
    that is covered by this decision.
    
    Final Decision
    
        Accordingly, the Administrator of NHTSA hereby decides that each of 
    the passenger cars listed in the annex to this notice is substantially 
    similar to a passenger car originally manufactured for sale in the 
    United States, certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and of the same model 
    year, and is capable of being readily altered to conform to all 
    applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards.
    
    Vehicle Eligibility Number
    
        The importer of a vehicle admissible under any final decision must 
    indicate on the form HS-7 accompanying entry the appropriate vehicle 
    eligibility number indicating that the vehicle is eligible for entry. 
    All passenger cars listed in the annex to this notice are eligible for 
    entry into the United States under Vehicle Eligibility No. VSA-80.
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) and (b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8; 
    delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.50.
    
    
    [[Page 41619]]
    
    
        Issued July 30, 1998.
    Ricardo Martinez,
    Administrator.
    
    Annex--Vehicles Covered by Final Decision
    
        The following passenger cars, certified by their original 
    manufacturer as complying with all applicable Canadian Motor Vehicle 
    Safety Standards:
    
    1994 and 1995 Chrysler LeBaron
    1994 and 1995 Dodge Spirit
    1994 and 1995 Dodge Shadow
    1994 and 1995 Dodge Viper
    1994 and 1995 Plymouth Acclaim
    1994 and 1995 Plymouth Sundance 1995 Mazda Protege
    
    [FR Doc. 98-20759 Filed 8-3-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
8/4/1998
Published:
08/04/1998
Department:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Final decision that certain nonconforming vehicles are eligible for importation.
Document Number:
98-20759
Dates:
This decision is effective August 4, 1998.
Pages:
41617-41619 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. NHTSA-98-4079
PDF File:
98-20759.pdf