99-20010. Depreciation Accounting  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 149 (Wednesday, August 4, 1999)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 42304-42307]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-20010]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
    
    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
    
    18 CFR Part 101
    
    [Docket No. RM99-7-000]
    
    
    Depreciation Accounting
    
    July 29, 1999.
    AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) proposes 
    to amend its regulations to set forth uniform standards based on the 
    straight-line method of depreciation and the assets' estimated useful 
    service lives for determining depreciation for accounting purposes.
    
    DATES: Comments on the proposed rulemaking are due on or before October 
    4, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: File comments on the notice of proposed rulemaking with the 
    Office of the Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
    First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426. Comments should reference 
    Docket No. RM99-7-000.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    
    Gregory Berson (Technical Information), Office of Finance, Accounting 
    and Operations, 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426 (202) 
    219-2603;
    Amy L. Blauman (Legal Information), Office of the General Counsel, 888 
    First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, (202) 208-2143
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In addition to publishing the full text of 
    this document in the Federal Register, the Commission also provides all 
    interested persons an opportunity to inspect or copy the contents of 
    this document during normal business hours in the Public Reference Room 
    at 888 First Street, N.E., Room 2A, Washington, D.C. 20426.
        The Commission Issuance Posting System (CIPS) provides access to 
    the texts of formal documents issued by the Commission from November 
    14, 1994, to the present. CIPS can be accessed via Internet through 
    FERC's Home page (http://www.ferc.fed.us) using the CIPS Link or the 
    Energy Information Online icon. Documents will be available on CIPS in 
    ASCII and WordPerfect 6.1. User assistance is available at 202-208-2474 
    or by E-mail to cips.master@ferc.fed.us.
        This document is also available through the Commission's Records 
    and Information Management System (RIMS), an electronic storage and 
    retrieval system of documents submitted to and issued by the Commission 
    after November 16, 1981. Documents from November 1995 to the present 
    can be viewed and printed. RIMS is available in the Public Reference 
    Room or remotely via Internet through FERC's Home page using the RIMS 
    link or the Energy Information Online icon. User assistance is 
    available at 202-208-2222, or by E-mail to rimsmaster@ferc.fed.us.
        Finally, the complete text on diskette in WordPerfect format may be 
    purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, RVJ International, 
    Inc. RVJ International, Inc. is located in the Public Reference Room at 
    888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426.
    
    I. Introduction
    
        The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) proposes to 
    amend the General Instructions of 18 CFR Part 101 to establish, for 
    those public utilities and licensees that are subject to Part 101, 
    criteria for determining depreciation for accounting purposes.
    
    II. Background
    
    A. Commission Authority
    
        The Commission has authority under section 301 of the Federal Power 
    Act (FPA) 1 over the accounting practices of public 
    utilities and licensees. Pursuant to section 301, the Commission has 
    prescribed a Uniform System of
    
    [[Page 42305]]
    
    Accounts (USofA) 2 that must be followed by these 
    jurisdictional entities.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ 16 U.S.C. 825.
        \2\ See 18 CFR Part 101.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Commission also has authority under section 302 of the FPA 
    3 over the depreciation accounting practices of public 
    utilities and licensees. This includes the authority to determine and 
    fix proper and adequate depreciation rates for accounting purposes.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \3\ 16 U.S.C. 825a.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Commission believes it has a statutory obligation to ensure 
    that proper amounts of depreciation are charged to expense in each 
    financial reporting period. In order to fulfill this statutory 
    obligation, the Commission had required public utilities and licensees 
    to obtain Commission approval prior to changing their depreciation 
    rates for accounting purposes. See, e.g., MidAmerican Energy Co., 79 
    FERC para. 61,169 (1997), reh'g denied, 81 para. FERC 61,081 (1997). 
    However, a recent decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 
    District of Columbia Circuit, Alabama Power Company, et al. v. FERC, 
    160 F.3d 7 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (Alabama Power), overturned the 
    Commission's action on procedural grounds.
        In light of Alabama Power, we decide here to proceed with a 
    rulemaking to establish the principles that public utilities and 
    licensees subject to Part 101 must follow in determining depreciation 
    rates for accounting purposes.4 We are not proposing to 
    ascertain, determine, and fix individual company depreciation rates as 
    part of this rulemaking. Instead, we provide a regulatory framework for 
    monitoring depreciation accounting practices and for taking action in 
    individual cases if and when the need arises--to ensure that public 
    utilities' and licensees' 5 books reflect proper 
    depreciation amounts.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ The proposed rules would not apply to public utilities and 
    licensees that have obtained waivers from our accounting 
    requirements under 18 CFR Part 101.
        \5\ Henceforth in this narrative preamble, our use of 
    ``utilities'' is intended to encompass both public utilities and 
    licensees; we will refer to ``utilities'' for ease of reading. See 
    18 CFR Part 101 Definition No. 39.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    B. Utility Depreciation Principles
    
        Expenditures for utility plant and other long-lived assets that 
    will be used in the production of utility products and services are 
    typically made in one year but are expected to produce benefits over a 
    number of years. These assets also have finite useful lives, and their 
    value will be substantially diminished at the end of their useful 
    lives.6 Depreciation represents the cost of using up the 
    assets' service potential during their useful lives.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \6\ In some cases, assets have negative salvage value, i.e., the 
    utility will have to pay additional costs to remove the asset and 
    restore the plant site at the end of the asset's life.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Depreciation is a process of cost allocation, not of 
    valuation.7 The primary objective of depreciation accounting 
    is to allocate the cost of utility property to the periods during which 
    the property is used in utility operations, i.e., over the useful 
    service life, in a systematic and rational manner.8
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \7\ See FASB Original Pronouncements, Accounting Research 
    Bulletin No. 43, Chapter 9, Section C, para. 5 (1998).
        \8\ The Commission's Uniform System of Accounts for electric 
    utilities defines depreciation as follows:
        Depreciation, as applied to depreciable electric plant, means 
    the loss in service value not restored by current maintenance, 
    incurred in connection with the consumption or prospective 
    retirement of electric plant in the course of service from causes 
    which are known to be in current operation and against which the 
    utility is not protected by insurance. Among the causes to be given 
    consideration are wear and tear, decay, action of the elements, 
    inadequacy, obsolescence, changes in the art, changes in demand, and 
    requirements of public authorities.
        18 CFR Part 101 Definition No. 12.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Generally, the amount of annual depreciation is determined by 
    multiplying the asset's depreciable base (original cost less estimated 
    salvage value) by a depreciation rate. The depreciation rate is a 
    function of the chosen depreciation method and the asset's useful 
    service life. The depreciation method (e.g., straight line, double-
    declining balance, sum of the years digits, etc.) determines the timing 
    of the recognition of depreciation expenses. The asset's useful service 
    life, expressed in units of time or production, is based on estimates 
    of the physical, economic or productive life of the asset.
        Depreciation accounting is not intended to achieve a desired 
    financial objective, such as an increase or decrease in reported net 
    income or an adjustment in plant costs to perceived market values. 
    Rather, depreciation accounting reflects the decrease in service value, 
    i.e., the using up of the productive capacity of the asset, over its 
    service life. The decrease in service value is estimated using a 
    systematic and rational method to allocate the original cost of assets 
    to the periods over which they are used in utility service--factors 
    that are independent of both an entity's profitability and asset market 
    values.
        Recognition of depreciation expenses for accounting purposes is not 
    dependent on the rate recovery of the cost of utility plant. When 
    differences arise between accounting depreciation and rate recovery of 
    the cost of utility plant, the USofA requires utilities with cost-based 
    rates to account for the differences as regulatory assets and 
    liabilities.\9\ In this way, utilities can easily keep track of any 
    differences between accounting depreciation and ratemaking recovery of 
    plant costs in their various regulatory jurisdictions.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \9\ See 18 CFR Part 101 Definition No. 30, Accounts 182.3 and 
    254.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    C. Reasons for This Rule
    
        The Commission believes it must standardize depreciation accounting 
    practices in order to maintain its ability to determine just and 
    reasonable, cost-based utility rates and to ensure the reasonableness 
    and reliability of financial information used by regulators, investors, 
    consumers, and the general public.
        Since depreciation is a significant portion of the total cost of 
    providing utility service, the determination of the appropriate amount 
    of depreciation is of concern to this Commission, State commissions, 
    utility management, investors, consumers and others who have an 
    interest in or are affected by the financial performance of these 
    entities. Because the Commission uses depreciation recorded on a 
    utility's books as a starting point for determining cost-based utility 
    rates,\10\ to protect consumers and to guard against abuses, the 
    Commission must have assurance that such depreciation expenses are 
    proper.\11\ Moreover, standardizing depreciation accounting practices 
    will better ensure that utilities' financial information, reported to 
    regulators, utility investors, utility consumers and the general 
    public, is reasonable and reliable.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \10\ The Commission typically permits a utility to recover its 
    investment in utility property over its useful life through 
    inclusion of depreciation expense in the cost of service used to set 
    the utility's cost-based rates. The Commission also typically allows 
    a utility to earn a return on its undepreciated investment in 
    utility property.
        \11\ For example, a utility could, through inappropriate 
    depreciation practices, over-recover the cost of utility plant, 
    inappropriately attempt to mitigate stranded costs or shift benefits 
    from asset sales to shareholders or particular customer groups. See, 
    e.g., Midwest Power Systems Inc., 67 FERC para. 61,076 at 61,208 
    (1994); South Carolina Electric & Gas Co., 76 FERC para. 61,338 at 
    62,616-19 (1996), reh'g denied, 79 FERC para. 61,083 (1997); accord, 
    Ohio Edison Co., et al., 84 FERC para. 61,157 at 61,860-63 (1998).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Additionally, by establishing generally applicable rules relating 
    to depreciation accounting, this rulemaking is intended to satisfy the 
    procedural prerequisite of FPA section 302 that the Court, in Alabama 
    Power, supra, found necessary to enable the Commission to set 
    individual utility
    
    [[Page 42306]]
    
    depreciation rates for accounting purposes.
        Therefore, we are proposing here that utilities subject to Part 101 
    follow uniform standards in determining depreciation rates for 
    accounting purposes. This will ensure that depreciation for accounting 
    purposes is recorded in accordance with sound depreciation principles 
    and thus, in particular, meets this Commission's regulatory needs.\12\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \12\ Standardizing utilities' depreciation accounting practices 
    will, for example, provide a greater level of assurance that 
    depreciation accounting will not be used to achieve inappropriate 
    ends. See supra note 10.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        We invite interested parties to present their views on this 
    proposal through the written comment procedures outlined below.
    
    III. Discussion
    
        The current USofA for utilities contains limited guidance on 
    depreciation accounting. The USofA defines depreciation and its related 
    components,\13\ and provides various accounts for the recording of 
    depreciation,\14\ but does not state how utilities are to determine the 
    rates used to calculate the amount of depreciation to be recorded in 
    the accounts.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \13\ See, e.g., 18 CFR Part 101, Definition Nos. 10, 12, 19, 34-
    36 (1999).
        \14\ See, e.g., 18 CFR Part 101, Accounts 108, 110, 119, and 403 
    (1999).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In light of the foregoing, the Commission proposes to revise its 
    USofA to require uniform and consistent determinations of depreciation 
    rates for accounting purposes. We also take this opportunity to outline 
    how we intend to oversee utility depreciation practices in the 
    foreseeable future.
    
    A. Regulatory Framework
    
        The Commission proposes to require utilities subject to Part 101 to 
    use depreciation rates for accounting purposes that are based on the 
    straight-line method of depreciation and the assets' estimated useful 
    service lives.\15\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \15\ The USofA defines service life as ``the time between the 
    date electric plant is includible in electric plant in service, or 
    electric plant leased to others, and the date of its retirement. If 
    depreciation is accounted for on a production basis rather than on a 
    time basis, then service life should be measured in terms of the 
    appropriate unit of production.'' 18 CFR Part 101 Definition No. 35.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        A straight-line method of depreciation is one that allocates the 
    service value \16\ of depreciable property to expense in equal monthly 
    charges over the property's useful service life. It is the method 
    typically used by utilities today.\17\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \16\ The USofA defines service value as ``the difference between 
    original cost and net salvage value of electric plant.'' 18 CFR Part 
    101 Definition No. 36.
        \17\ See, e.g., J. Suelflow, Public Utility Accounting: Theory 
    and Application 96 (1973) (``Straight line is the predominant method 
    used by utilities and sanctioned by most regulatory bodies.''); 
    Deloitte Haskins & Sells, Public Utilities Manual 23 (1980) (``[T]he 
    straight-line concept is applied almost universally for both 
    accounting and rulemaking. * * *''); C. Phillips, The Regulation of 
    Public Utilities: Theory and Practice 272 (3d ed. 1993) (The 
    straight line method * * * is the simplest and most commonly 
    used.''); L. Hyman, America's Electric Utilities: Past, Present and 
    Future 292 (5th ed. 1994) (``The book depreciation rate is a 
    straight line rate for most utility companies.''); accord 
    Depreciation Subcommittee of the NARUC Committee on Engineering, 
    Depreciation, and Valuation of the National Association of 
    Regulatory Utility Commissioners, Public Utility Depreciation 
    Practices 12 (1968) (``In the two decades, since the Report of the 
    Committee on Depreciation of the NARUC was published in 1943, the 
    use of the straight-line method for accounting and rate-making 
    purposes has became almost universal for public utilities.'').
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Commission proposes that the depreciation period for utility 
    property be its estimated useful service life. The current practice of 
    estimating useful service lives of assets based on engineering or other 
    studies of the expected physical, economic, or productive lives over 
    which the assets will provide utility service, would continue.\18\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \18\ Changes in estimated useful service lives would be based on 
    updated depreciation study results that demonstrated different 
    service lives (shorter or longer) were appropriate.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Where composite depreciation rates are used, they would be based on 
    the weighted average estimated useful service lives of the assets 
    comprising the composite group.
        The Commission believes that computing depreciation on a straight-
    line basis over assets' estimated useful service lives will produce 
    more relevant and reliable financial information for regulatory and 
    financial reporting purposes than other depreciation techniques (e.g., 
    accelerated depreciation, retirement method, sinking fund depreciation, 
    etc.) that do not ratably allocate plant costs to each accounting 
    period. Because of the relatively consistent operation of utility plant 
    over time, the use of the straight-line method and estimated useful 
    service lives appears to provide the most practical way to measure the 
    amount of depreciation consumed each year in producing utility products 
    and services. The straight-line method is also simple in its 
    application in contrast to other depreciation techniques. It is, as 
    well, the standard method for business in general, conforms to 
    generally accepted accounting principles (i.e., systematic and 
    rational) and, as noted, is the method typically used by utilities 
    today.\19\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \19\ See supra note 17.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    B. Future Commission Action
    
        We also take this opportunity to explain how the Commission intends 
    to exercise its authority over depreciation accounting in the 
    foreseeable future.
        On a case by case basis, e.g., in conjunction with audits, 
    complaints, etc., it may become necessary, as a result of these 
    proceedings, for the Commission from time to time to ascertain and 
    determine, and by order fix, the accounting depreciation rates for 
    individual utilities pursuant to FPA section 302. However, unless 
    otherwise ordered by the Commission, individual utilities will not be 
    required to file their accounting depreciation rates with us for our 
    approval. This approach is consistent with our efforts to reduce 
    regulatory burdens to the degree possible and facilitate the transition 
    to competition in the electric utility industry.
    
    IV. Environmental Statement
    
        The Commission excludes certain actions not having a significant 
    effect on the human environment from the requirement to prepare an 
    environmental assessment or an environmental impact statement.\20\ The 
    promulgation of a rule that is procedural or that does not 
    substantially change the effect of legislation or regulations being 
    amended raises no environmental considerations.\21\ The instant 
    proposed rule amends Part 101 of the Commission's regulations to codify 
    prevalent utility practice and does not substantially change the effect 
    of the underlying legislation or the regulations being revised. 
    Likewise, approval of actions under section 301 of the FPA, relating to 
    accounting orders, also raises no environmental considerations. The 
    instant rule fundamentally involves accounting matters, establishing 
    standardized depreciation accounting practices. Accordingly, no 
    environmental consideration is necessary.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \20\ 18 CFR 380.4.
        \21\ 18 CFR 380.4(a)(2)(ii).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    V. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, requires 
    rulemakings to contain either a description and analysis of the effect 
    that the proposed rule will have on small entities or a certification 
    that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a 
    substantial number of small entities.
    
    [[Page 42307]]
    
        In Mid-Tex Elec. Coop. v. FERC, 773 F.2d 327 (D.C. Cir. 1985), the 
    court found that Congress, in passing the RFA, intended agencies to 
    limit their consideration ``to small entities that would be directly 
    regulated'' by proposed rules. Id. at 342. The court further concluded 
    that ``the relevant `economic impact' was the impact of compliance with 
    the proposed rule on regulated small entities.'' Id. at 342.
        The Commission certifies that, given the entities subject to this 
    proposed rule and their current depreciation accounting practices, this 
    proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact upon a 
    substantial number of small entities.
    
    VI. Public Reporting Burden and Information Collection Statement
    
        The Commission proposes to amend 18 CFR Part 101 by standardizing 
    the method for determining depreciation rates for accounting purposes. 
    Because the proposed rule simply standardizes the method of calculating 
    depreciation rates, without adding or changing any reporting 
    requirements, it does not impose any additional public reporting 
    burden.
        Interested persons may obtain information on the reporting 
    requirements by contacting the following: Federal Energy Regulatory 
    Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426 [Attention: 
    Michael Miller, Capital Planning and Policy Group, Phone: (202) 208-
    1415, Fax: (202) 208-2425, E-mail: mike.miller@ferc.fed.us].
        To submit comments concerning collections of information and 
    associated burden estimate(s), please send your comments to the contact 
    listed above and to the Office of Management and Budget, Office of 
    Information and Regulatory Affairs, Washington, DC 20503, [Attention: 
    Desk Officer for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Phone: (202) 
    395-3087, Fax: (202) 395-7285].
    
    VII. Public Comment Procedures
    
        Prior to taking final action on this proposed rulemaking, we are 
    inviting written comments from interested persons. The Commission also 
    is notifying each State commission having jurisdiction with respect to 
    any public utility involved and is giving reasonable opportunity to 
    each State commission to present its views for our consideration. All 
    comments in response to this notice should be submitted to the Office 
    of Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
    NE, Washington, D.C. 20426, and should refer to Docket No. RM99-7-000. 
    An original and fourteen (14) copies of such comments should be filed 
    with the Commission on or before October 4, 1999.
        In addition to filing paper copies, the Commission encourages the 
    filing of comments either on computer diskette or via Internet E-Mail. 
    Comments may be filed in the following formats: WordPerfect 8.0 or 
    lower version, MS Word Office 97 or lower version, or ASCII format.
        For diskette filing, include the following information on the 
    diskette label: Docket No. RM99-7-000; the name of the filing entity; 
    the software and version used to create the file; and the name and 
    telephone number of a contact person.
        For Internet E-Mail submittal, comments should be submitted to 
    comment.rm@ferc.fed.us'' in the following format. On the subject 
    line, specify Docket No. RM99-7-000. In the body of the E-Mail message, 
    include the name of the filing entity; the software and version used to 
    create the file, and the name and telephone number of the contact 
    person. Attach the comments to the E-Mail in one of the formats 
    specified above. The Commission will send an automatic acknowledgment 
    to the sender's E-Mail address upon receipt. Questions on electronic 
    filing should be directed to Brooks Carter at: 202-501-8145, E-Mail 
    address: brooks.carter@ferc.fed.us.
        Commenters should take note that, until the Commission amends its 
    rules and regulations, the paper copy of the filing remains the 
    official copy of the document submitted. Therefore, any discrepancies 
    between the paper filing and the electronic filing or the diskette will 
    be resolved by reference to the paper filing.
        All written comments will be placed in the Commission's public 
    files and will be available for inspection in the Commission's Public 
    Reference room at 888 First Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20426, during 
    regular business hours. Additionally, comments may be viewed, printed 
    or downloaded remotely via the Internet through FERC's Homepage using 
    the RIMS or CIPS link. RIMS contains all comments but only those 
    comments submitted in electronic format are available on CIPS. User 
    assistance is available at 202-208-2222, or by E-Mail to 
    rimsmaster@ferc.fed.us.
    
    List of Subjects in 18 CFR Part 101
    
        Electric power, electric utilities, reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements, Uniform System of Accounts.
    
        By direction of the Commission.
    David P. Boergers,
    Secretary.
    
        In consideration of the foregoing, the Commission proposes to amend 
    Part 101, Chapter I, Title 18 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as 
    set forth below.
    
    PART 101--UNIFORM SYSTEM OF ACCOUNTS PRESCRIBED FOR PUBLIC 
    UTILITIES AND LICENSEES SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE FEDERAL 
    POWER ACT
    
        1. The authority citation for Part 101 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 16 U.S.C. 791a-825r, 2601-2645; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 42 
    U.S.C. 7102-7352, 7651-7651o.
    
        2. In Part 101, General Instructions, paragraph 22 is added to read 
    as follows:
    
    General Instructions
    
    * * * * *
        22. Depreciation Accounting
        A. Method. Utilities must use the straight-line method of 
    depreciation. The straight-line method allocates equal amounts of the 
    service value of utility property to expense during each year of the 
    property's useful service life.
        B. Service Lives. Estimated useful service lives of depreciable 
    property must be supported by engineering or other depreciation 
    studies.
        C. Rate. Utilities must use percentage rates of depreciation that 
    are based on the straight-line method and the estimated useful service 
    lives of depreciable property. Where composite depreciation rates are 
    used, they should be based on the weighted average estimated useful 
    service lives of the depreciable property comprising the composite 
    group.
    
    [FR Doc. 99-20010 Filed 8-3-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/04/1999
Department:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Document Number:
99-20010
Dates:
Comments on the proposed rulemaking are due on or before October 4, 1999.
Pages:
42304-42307 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. RM99-7-000
PDF File:
99-20010.pdf
CFR: (1)
18 CFR 101