94-19157. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Amendment Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 to Proposed Rule Change by Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. Relating to the Creation of the Chicago Match System  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 150 (Friday, August 5, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-19157]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: August 5, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Release No. 34-34469; File No. SR-CHX-93-19]
    
     
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Amendment Nos. 1, 2, 3 
    and 4 to Proposed Rule Change by Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. Relating 
    to the Creation of the Chicago Match System
    
    August 1, 1994.
        Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
    (``Act''), 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1), notice is hereby given that on April 4, 
    1994, May 4, 1994, June 7, 1994 and July 12, 1994, the Chicago Stock 
    Exchange, Inc. (``CHX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange 
    Commission (``Commission'') Amendment Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 to a proposed 
    rule change\1\ as described in Items I, II and III below, which items 
    have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization.\2\ The 
    Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on Amendment 
    Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 to the proposed rule change from interested persons.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\File No. SR-CHX-93-19. The proposed rule change was 
    originally filed on August 6, 1993, and was published for comment in 
    Securities Exchange Act Release No. 33542 (January 28, 1994), 59 FR 
    5451.
        \2\See Letter Amendment No. 1 to SR-CHX-93-19, from David T. 
    Rusoff, Attorney, Foley & Lardner to Sandy Sciole, Special Counsel, 
    Division of Market Regulation, Commission, dated March 29, 1994; 
    Letter Amendment No. 2 to SR-CHX-93-19, from David T. Rusoff, 
    Attorney, Foley & Lardner to Sharon M. Lawson, Assistant Director, 
    Division of Market Regulation, dated May 4, 1994; Letter Amendment 
    No. 3 to SR-CHX-93-19, from David T. Rusoff, Attorney, Foley & 
    Lardner to Sharon M. Lawson, Assistant Director, Division of Market 
    Regulation, dated June 7, 1994, and Amendment No. 4 to SR-CHX-93-19, 
    dated July 11, 1994.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of 
    Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
    
        Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Act, the Chicago Stock Exchange 
    is amending the rules for its institutional matching system, the 
    Chicago Match (formerly known as the Match Market Exchange Facility).
    
    II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
        In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
    included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
    proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
    proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at 
    the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization 
    has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections (A), (B) and (C) below, 
    of the most significant aspects of such statements.
    
    (A) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
    1. Purpose
        The CHX submitted to the Commission Amendment Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 to 
    request that the Commission amend its proposed rules relating to the 
    proposed Chicago Match System (``Chicago Match'').
        The purpose of Amendment No. 4 is to further amend the proposed 
    rules relating to the Chicago Match by (i) changing the cross price of 
    the match to the mid-point between the consolidated best bid and offer 
    regardless of the size of the spread; (ii) reporting to the 
    consolidated tape or NASDAQ the cross price plus or minus the average 
    liquidity fee for each stock stated in 256ths; (iii) limiting the 
    maximum liquidity fee or liquidity credit (received or paid) to \1/2\ 
    of the spread of the consolidated best bid and offer at cross time 
    (regardless of the size of the spread); and (iv) not permitting orders 
    to sell short to be entered with a liquidity fee.
        As stated above, this amendment changes the proposed cross price 
    for the Chicago Match. As initially proposed, all matched orders will 
    be executed at a random time within a pre-determined ten minute window 
    period at the market price at such time. The market price will still be 
    calculated based upon the spread of a particular issue. However, rather 
    than changing the price depending on whether there is a \1/8\, \1/4\, 
    \3/8\, etc. spread and determining whether there is an order imbalance, 
    Amendment No. 4 proposes to have the Chicago Match calculate the market 
    price as the mid-point between the consolidated best bid and offer 
    regardless of the size of the spread. For example, if the consolidated 
    best bid and best offer for stock X was 20-20 \1/8\, the cross price 
    would be 20\1/16\.
        As a result of the above change, Amendment No. 4 also changes the 
    way trades in the Chicago Match are reported to the Consolidated Tape 
    or NASDAQ. As proposed, the Exchange will report one trade for each 
    stock executed in the Chicago Match. That trade report will include the 
    total number of shares executed in that stock and a price equal to the 
    cross price plus (or minus) the volume weighted average of liquidity 
    fees paid (or liquidity credits received) for that stock.
        Also as a result of the above change to the cross price, limited 
    price orders, orders with a liquidity fee or credit entered in cents, 
    and orders that are entered with a liquidity fee or credit relative to 
    the consolidated best bid or offer or as a computed quantity (in 
    addition to liquidity fees or credits entered in cents) will be 
    eligible to be displayed orders. The Exchange will assign numeric 
    values to these orders based on the then current consolidated best bid 
    and offer. It is anticipated that initially the Exchange will update 
    this information at least every 15 minutes or such less time that is 
    possible.
        In addition to the above changes, Amendment No. 4 changes how 
    orders in a specialist's book interact with the Chicago Match and 
    limits the maximum size of liquidity fees and credits. As before, the 
    CHX's CQS quotation will automatically be fed into the Chicago Match 
    facility on a real-time basis. These bids and/or offers will be entered 
    as an order in Chicago Match. Rather than limiting interaction with the 
    book to \1/8\ spread issues however, the revised rules would enter the 
    CHX CQS quotation into the match in all issues. If entered, these 
    orders will have the highest priority of execution at that liquidity 
    credit level.
        As stated above, the Chicago Match will limit the maximum size of 
    liquidity fees and liquidity credits. With respect to the limitation of 
    the size of liquidity fees, if a liquidity fee is greater than \1/2\ of 
    the spread of the Consolidated Best Bid and Offer at cross time it will 
    be reduced to \1/2\ of the spread at cross time. For example, if \1/2\ 
    of the spread is 6\1/4\ cents, and an order with a liquidity fee of 10 
    cents entered, the maximum liquidity fee that order can pay is 6\1/4\ 
    cents. Liquidity credits, on the other hand, will be treated 
    differently than liquidity fees. For liquidity credits, the Chicago 
    Match will not permit liquidity credits to be received in an amount 
    greater than \1/2\ of the spread of the Consolidated Best Bid and 
    Offer. For example, if the spread of the Consolidated Best Bid and 
    Offer at cross time was \1/2\, the maximum liquidity credit allowed 
    would be 25 cents.\3\ If an order was entered with a liquidity credit 
    greater than 25 cents, the user would have an option of either having 
    the liquidity credit reduced to the Consolidated Best Bid and Offer or 
    having the order be excluded from the match.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \3\This would be \1/2\ of the \1/2\ spread or \1/4\ which is 25 
    cents.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The final change proposed by this amendment concerns short sales. 
    In order to ensure that any order to sell short can have no market 
    impact and not contribute to a volume weighted average liquidity fee 
    that is less than the middle of the spread, no order to sell short will 
    be permitted to be executed if it includes a liquidity fee. Liquidity 
    credits, however, will be allowed.
        In addition to the amendments submitted in Amendment No. 4, the 
    Exchange also made changes to the Chicago Match Rules in Amendment Nos. 
    1, 2 and 3. Amendment No. 1 changed the name of this proposed system 
    from ``Match Market Exchange'' (``MMX'') to ``Chicago Match''. 
    Amendment No. 1 changed the definition of size conditions (in Rule 
    2(ab)) to be considered for a near match to be a specific number 
    entered by the User instead of the former procedure of designating the 
    size conditions as ``small,'' ``medium,'' and ``large.'' Amendment No. 
    1 required that liquidity fees and credits be entered in cents and 
    entered relative to the Consolidated Best Bid and Offer at cross time 
    or entered as a computed quantity (in Rule 6(e)(9)). Amendment No. 1 
    also made technical changes and corrections that do not affect the 
    substance of the proposal and made other substantive changes that 
    subsequently were amended.
        Amendment No. 2 changed the definition of ``Near Match'' (in Rule 
    2(w)) to clarify that it means two orders for a particular security in 
    which (i) the number of shares of each order equals or exceeds the 
    minimum size specified by the other order; and (ii) the Liquidity 
    Credit required by one side is greater than the Liquidity Fee offered 
    by the other side. Amendment No. 2 clarified the meaning and intent of 
    proposed Rule 6(e)(8) which permits a user to enter another user's name 
    in order to prevent any matches between those two users, thereby 
    excluding certain users when necessary to comply with ERISA. Amendment 
    No. 2 also clarified the meaning and intent of proposed Rule 6(e)(7) 
    which permits a user to exclude an entire category of contra parties. 
    Amendment No. 2 further clarified that Conditional Orders may not be 
    Displayed Orders and that all confirmations will comply with the 
    requirements of Rule 10b-10 under the Act; and it noted that non-member 
    users will be required to have $10 million for investment purposes.
        Amendment No. 3 amended Rule 3 to delete references to the Exchange 
    permitting orders for securities that are not listed or admitted to 
    unlisted trading privileges on the Exchange to be entered into the 
    Chicago Match System. Amendment No. 3 also made substantive changes to 
    proposed Rule 9(b) (which attempted to eliminate any argument that 
    trades executed in the Chicago Match could trade through other market's 
    published quotations) which were subsequently amended in Amendment No. 
    4.
    2. Basis
        The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the 
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in that it is designed to promote just 
    and equitable principles of trade and to protect investors and the 
    public interest.
    
    (B) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition.
    
        The Exchange believes that no burden will be placed on competition 
    as a result of the proposed rule change.
    
    (C) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the 
    Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
    
        No comments were solicited or received.
    
    III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
    Commission Action
    
        Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the 
    Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may 
    designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to 
    be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
    which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
        (A) By order approve the proposed rule change, or
        (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
    change should be disapproved.
    
    IV. Solicitation of Comments
    
        Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
    arguments concerning the foregoing. Persons making written submissions 
    should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and 
    Exchange Commission, 450 fifth Street, NW., Washington DC 20549. Copies 
    of the submissions, all subsequent amendments, all written statements 
    with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the 
    Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
    rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
    that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
    of 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552, will be available for inspection and copying at 
    the principal office of the above-referenced self-regulatory 
    organization. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-CHX-93-19 and 
    should be submitted by August 22, 1994.
    
        For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 94-19157 Filed 8-4-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/05/1994
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-19157
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: August 5, 1994, Release No. 34-34469, File No. SR-CHX-93-19