96-19803. Food Standards: Amendment of Standards of Identity for Enriched Grain Products to Require Addition of Folic Acid; Correction  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 151 (Monday, August 5, 1996)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Page 40513]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-19803]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES-
    
    Food and Drug Administration
    
    21 CFR Parts 136, 137, and 139
    
    [Docket No. 91N-100S]
    RIN 0910-AA19
    
    
    Food Standards: Amendment of Standards of Identity for Enriched 
    Grain Products to Require Addition of Folic Acid; Correction
    
    AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
    
    ACTION: Final rule; correction.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a final 
    rule that appeared in the Federal Register of March 5, 1996 (61 FR 
    8781). The final rule amended the standards of identity for several 
    enriched cereal-grain products and by cross-reference, the standards of 
    identity for enriched bromated flour, enriched vegetable macaroni, and 
    enriched vegetable noodle products, to require fortification of those 
    cereal grain products with folic acid. The document was published with 
    some errors. This document corrects those errors.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: January 1, 1998.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Felicia B. Satchell, Center for Food 
    Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-158), Food and Drug Administration, 
    200 C St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-205-5099.
    
        In FR Doc. No. 96-5014, appearing on page 8781 in the Federal 
    Register of Tuesday, March 5, 1996, the following corrections are made:
        1. On page 8781, in the third column, under the ``SUPPLEMENTARY 
    INFORMATION'' caption, in the second paragraph, in the eighth line, 
    ``consideration'' is corrected to read ``considerable''.
        2. On page 8782, in the first column, in the fourteenth line, 
    ``Health Claims'' is corrected to read ``folic acid health claims''; 
    and beginning on the same line ``58 FR 23254 at 23256'' is corrected to 
    read ``58 FR 53254 at 53256''; and in the nineteenth line,``the 
    claims'' is corrected to read ``the folic acid health claims''.
        3. On page 8783, in the first column, in the first full paragraph, 
    in the second line from the bottom, ``folate'' is corrected to read 
    ``folic acid''.
        4. On page 8786, in the first column, in the first full paragraph, 
    in the seventh line, the word ``direct'' is inserted after the word 
    ``include'', and in the same page, in the third full paragraph, the 
    last sentence in parenthesis is deleted.
        5. On page 8788, in the third column, in the second full paragraph, 
    in the fifth line, the word ``raises'' is removed and is reinserted in 
    the sixth line, after the word ``request''.
        6. On page 8794, in the third column, in the fifth full paragraph, 
    in the ninth line, the last sentence is corrected to read:
        The cost of the required label changes will vary with the 
    compliance period. The estimated cost of the required label changes 
    in the proposed rule was based on a compliance period of 1 year. 
    However, this final rule changes the compliance period from 1 year 
    to 2 years. This increase in the compliance period reduces the 
    estimated cost of required label changes to $11 million. The cost of 
    adding the required folic acid and the cost of testing are recurring 
    costs that are not significantly affected by the change in the 
    compliance period. Thus, the total one-time cost of relabeling these 
    products is estimated to be $11 million and the recurring costs are 
    estimated to be $6.5 million. These costs are extremely small 
    relative to the estimated health benefits of this final rule.
        7. On page 8795, in the first column, before ``B. Benefits'', the 
    following paragraph is added:
        ``Total Costs. If fortification were to be at 70 /100 g, 
    quantified costs for allowing 2 years for compliance are now estimated 
    to be $16 million. If fortification were to be at 350 g/100 g, 
    quantified costs for allowing 2 years for compliance are now estimated 
    to be $23.5 million. Again, FDA has declined to quantify the costs of 
    neurologic effects due to masking of anemia of vitamin B12 
    deficiency.''
        8. On page 8795, in the second column, under section 2.a, in the 
    sixth line ``10 to 50 percent of'' is removed; on the same page, in the 
    third column, under ``C. Conclusion'', in the second paragraph, in the 
    third line ``$27 million'' is corrected to read ``$17.5 million''; in 
    the same paragraph, beginning in the thirteenth line, ``should be 
    approximately 25 percent of the first year cost'' is corrected to read 
    ``is estimated to be approximately $7 million''; and in the third 
    paragraph, in the second line, ``$27 million'' is corrected to read 
    ``$17.5 million''.
    
        Dated: July 25, 1996.
    William K. Hubbard,
    Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination.
    [FR Doc. 96-19803 Filed 8-2-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
1/1/1998
Published:
08/05/1996
Department:
Food and Drug Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule; correction.
Document Number:
96-19803
Dates:
January 1, 1998.
Pages:
40513-40513 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 91N-100S
RINs:
0910-AA19: Food Labeling Review
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/0910-AA19/food-labeling-review
PDF File:
96-19803.pdf
CFR: (3)
21 CFR 136
21 CFR 137
21 CFR 139