96-19841. Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York, et al.  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 151 (Monday, August 5, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 40676-40679]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-19841]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Rel. No. IC-22109; File No. 812-9672]
    
    
    Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York, et al.
    
    July 30, 1996.
    AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or the 
    ``Commission'').
    
    ACTION: Notice of Application for Exemptions under the Investment 
    Company Act of 1940 (the ``1940 Act'').
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    APPLICANTS: Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York (the 
    ``Company''), Allstate Life of New York Separate Account A (the 
    ``Variable Account''), and Allstate Life Financial Services, Inc. 
    (``ALFS'').
    
    RELEVANT 1940 ACT SECTIONS: Order requested under Section 6(c) of the 
    1940 Act for exemptions from Sections 26(a)(2)(C) and 27(c)(2) of the 
    1940 Act.
    
    SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicants seek an order permitting the Company 
    to deduct a mortality and expense risk charge from: (i) the assets of 
    the Variable Account in connection with the offer and sale of certain 
    flexible premium deferred variable annuity certificates (the 
    ``Contracts'') and any contracts offered in the future (``Future 
    Contracts'') by the Company which are materially similar to the 
    Contracts; and (ii) the assets of any other variable accounts 
    established in the future (``Future Accounts'') by the Company, in 
    connection with the offer and sale of Future Contracts. Applicants 
    propose that the order extend to any broker-dealer (``Other Broker-
    Dealers'') which may serve in the future as principal underwriter with 
    respect to the Contracts or Future Contracts.
    
    FILING DATE: The application was filed June 7, 1996.
    
    HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An order granting the application 
    will be
    
    [[Page 40677]]
    
    issued unless the Commission orders a hearing. Interested persons may 
    request a hearing on this application by writing to the Secretary of 
    the SEC and serving Applicants with a copy of the request, personally 
    or by mail. Hearing requests must be received by the Commission by 5:30 
    p.m. on August 26, 1996, and should be accompanied by proof of service 
    on Applicants in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, by 
    certificate of service. Hearing requests should state the nature of the 
    interest, the reason for the request, and the issues contested. Persons 
    may request notification of the date of a hearing by writing to the 
    Secretary of the SEC.
    
    ADDRESSES: Secretary, SEC, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, DC 
    20549. Applicants, c/o David E. Stone, Esq., Allstate Life Insurance 
    Company of New York, 3100 Sanders Road, Northbrook, Illinois 60062.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Peter R. Marcin, Law Clerk, or Wendy Finck Friedlander, Deputy Chief, 
    Office of Insurance Products, Division of Investment Management, at 
    (202) 942-0670.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Following is a summary of the application. 
    The complete application is available for a fee from the Public 
    Reference Branch of the SEC.
    
    Applicants' Representations
    
        1. The Company, a stock life insurance company incorporated in New 
    York, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Allstate Life Insurance Company 
    (``Allstate Life''), a stock life insurance company incorporated in 
    Illinois, which is wholly owned by Allstate Insurance Company 
    (``Allstate''), a stock property-liability insurance company 
    incorporated under the laws of Illinois.
        2. The Company established the Variable Account under New York law 
    on December 22, 1995 to fund variable annuity contracts. The Variable 
    Account is registered under the 1940 Act as a unit investment trust.
        3. The Variable Account is currently divided into nine sub-
    accounts. Each sub-account will invest exclusively in the shares of a 
    designated investment portfolio (each, a ``Portfolio'') of AIM Variable 
    Insurance Funds, Inc. (the ``Fund''). The Company, in the future, may 
    establish additional sub-accounts to invest in other Portfolios of the 
    Fund or in other funds. The Company also may establish Future Accounts 
    to support Future Contracts.
        4. ALFS, a wholly owned subsidiary of Allstate Life, will serve as 
    the distributor and principal underwriter for the Contracts. ALFS is 
    registered with the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 
    1934 as a broker-dealer and is a member of the National Association of 
    Securities Dealers, Inc.
        5. The Contracts are designed for use by individuals in retirement 
    plans that qualify for special federal income tax treatment under 
    Sections 401, 403, 408, or 457 of the Internal Revenue Code 
    (``Qualified Plans'') and in retirement plans that do not qualify for 
    special tax treatment under those sections.
        Contract owners may allocate premium payments to one or more sub-
    accounts of the Variable Account or to the Company's general account 
    (``Fixed Account''). The Contracts require a minimum initial premium 
    payment of $5,000 ($2,000 in the case of a Qualified Plan). Subsequent 
    premium payments must be at least $500 and may be made at any time 
    prior to the date on which income payments begin (``Payout Start 
    Date''). Under an automatic additions program, however, the minimum 
    purchase payment for allocation to the Variable Account is $100 and, 
    for allocation to the Fixed Account, the minimum purchase payment is 
    $500.
        6. The Contracts provide for a guaranteed death benefit. If the 
    Contract owner dies before the annuity date, the Company will pay a 
    death benefit to the beneficiary, upon receipt of due proof of death 
    and a payment election. The death benefit is based on the largest of 
    the following amounts: (a) the Contract value on the date the Company 
    determines the death benefit; (b) the amount that would have been 
    payable in the event of a full withdrawal of the Contract value on the 
    date the Company determines the death benefit; (c) the Contract value 
    on every seventh Contract anniversary beginning on the date the 
    Contract was issued immediately preceding the date the Company 
    determines the death benefit, adjusted by any purchase payments, 
    withdrawals and charges made between such death benefit anniversary and 
    the date the Company determines the death benefit; or (d) an enhanced 
    death benefit equal to the greatest of the anniversary values as of the 
    date the Company determines the death benefit. The anniversary value is 
    equal to the Contract value on a Contract anniversary, increased by 
    purchase payments made since that anniversary and reduced by the amount 
    of any partial withdrawals since that anniversary. Anniversary values 
    will be calculated for each Contract anniversary prior to the earlier 
    of (i) the date the death benefit is determined and (ii) the date the 
    deceased attained age 75 or 5 years after the date the Contract was 
    established, if later.
        7. The Company reserves the right to assess a $10 charge on each 
    transfer in excess of twelve per Contract year, excluding transfers 
    through dollar cost averaging \1\ and automatic fund rebalancing.\2\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ Dollar cost averaging permits the Owner to transfer a 
    specified amount every month from the one year guarantee period sub-
    account of the Fixed Account to any sub-account of the Variable 
    Account. Dollar cost averaging cannot be used to transfer amounts to 
    the Fixed Account.
        \2\ Automatice fund rebalancing allows all of the money 
    allocated to sub-accounts of the Variable Account to be rebalanced 
    to the desired allocation on a quarterly basis, determined from the 
    first date that the owner decides to rebalance. Each quarter, money 
    will be transferred among sub-accounts of the Variable Account to 
    achieve the desired allocation.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        8. The Company will deduct an administrative expense charge from 
    the assets of the Separate Account that is equal, on an annual basis, 
    to 0.10% of the daily net assets allocated to the sub-accounts of the 
    Variable Account.
        9. An annual Contract maintenance charge of $35 per Contract year 
    will be charged when Contract value is less than $50,000 at the time of 
    the deduction.
        10. Applicants represent that the administrative expense charge and 
    the annual Contract maintenance charge will not increase. In addition, 
    Applicants represent that these charges are deducted in reliance on 
    Rule 26a-1 under the 1940 Act.
        11. No deductions are made from purchase payments. There are no 
    withdrawal charges on amounts withdrawn up to 10% of the amount of 
    purchase payments per Contract year, but amounts withdrawn in excess of 
    this may be subject to a withdrawal charge, depending on the payment 
    year in which the withdrawal is made, at a maximum rate of 7% of 
    purchase payments withdrawn, declining at a rate of 1% per year until 
    the eighth year when the rate is 0%.
        12. The Company will deduct a mortality and expense risk charge 
    that is equal, on an annual basis, to 1.35% (including 0.10% for the 
    enhanced death benefit) of the daily net assets allocated to the sub-
    accounts of the Variable Account. Applicants state that approximately 
    0.95% of the 1.35% charge is attributable to mortality risk, and 
    approximately 0.40% is attributable to expense risk. The mortality and 
    expense risk charge is guaranteed not to increase over the life of the 
    Contract.
        13. The mortality risk arises from the Company's guarantee to cover 
    all death benefits and to make income payments in accordance with the 
    income plan
    
    [[Page 40678]]
    
    selected and income payment tables in the Contract. The expense risk 
    arises from the possibility that the Contract maintenance and 
    administrative expense charges will be insufficient to cover actual 
    administrative expenses.
        14. If the mortality and expense risk charge is insufficient to 
    cover the actual costs of the risks assumed, the Company will bear the 
    loss. If the charge exceeds actual costs, this excess will be profit to 
    the Company and will be available for any corporate purpose, including 
    payment of expenses relating to the distribution of the Contracts. The 
    Company expects a profit from the mortality and expense risk charge.
        15. The Company may incur premium taxes relating to the Contracts, 
    currently ranging up to 3.5%, and will deduct these taxes either at the 
    Payout Start Date or upon surrender of the Contract.
    
    Applicants' Legal Analysis and Conditions
    
        1. Section 6(c) of the 1940 Act authorizes the Commission to exempt 
    any person, security or transaction, or any class or classes of 
    persons, securities or transaction, from the provisions of the 1940 Act 
    and the rules promulgated thereunder if and to the extent that such 
    exemption is necessary or appropriate in the public interest and 
    consistent with the protection of investors and the purposes fairly 
    intended by the policy and provisions of the 1940 Act.
        2. Sections 26(a)(2)(C) and 27(c)(2) of the 1940 Act, in pertinent 
    part, prohibit a registered unit investment trust and any depositor 
    thereof or underwriter therefor from selling periodic payment plan 
    certificates unless the proceeds of all payments (other than sales 
    load) are deposited with a qualified bank as trustee or custodian and 
    held under arrangements which prohibit any payment to the depositor or 
    principal underwriter except a fee, not exceeding such reasonable 
    amount as the Commission may prescribe, for performing bookkeeping and 
    other administrative services of a character normally performed by the 
    bank itself.
        3. Applicants request an order of the Commission under Section 6(c) 
    of the 1940 Act granting exemptions from Sections 26(a)(2)(C) and 
    27(c)(2) of the 1940 Act to the extent necessary to permit the 
    deduction of a mortality and expense risk charge from: (i) the assets 
    of the Variable Account in connection with the offer and sale of 
    Contracts and Future Contracts; and (ii) the assets of any Future 
    Account, in connection with the officer and sale of Future Contracts. 
    Applicants propose that the order extend to Other Broker-Dealers which 
    may serve in the future as principal underwriter for the Contracts or 
    Future Contracts. Applicants assert that the requested exemptions are 
    appropriate in the public interest and consistent with the protection 
    of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the policy and 
    provisions of the 1940 Act.
        4. Applicants assert that the relief would promote competitiveness 
    in the variable annuity market by eliminating the need to file 
    redundant exemptive applications, thereby reducing administrative 
    expenses and maximizing efficient use of resources. Applicants submit 
    that the delay and expense involved in having to seek exemptive relief 
    repeatedly would impair the ability of the Company to take advantage 
    effectively of business opportunities as those opportunities arise, and 
    would not provide any additional benefit or protection to Contract 
    owners. Indeed, Contract owners may be disadvantaged as a result of 
    additional overhead costs incurred by the Applicants, any Future 
    Account, or Other Broker-Dealers.
        5. Applicants assert that the 1.25% mortality and expense risks 
    charge (excluding the 0.10% risk charge for the enhanced death benefit) 
    to be assessed under the Contracts and Future Contracts is within the 
    range of industry practice for comparable variable annuity products. 
    Applicants represent that this determination is based upon Applicants' 
    analysis of publicly available information about similar industry 
    products, taking into consideration such factors as: annuity purchase 
    rate guarantees, death benefit guarantees, other contract charges, the 
    frequency of charges, the administrative services performed by the 
    company with respect to the contracts, the means of promotion, the 
    market for the contracts, investment options under the contracts, 
    purchase payment transfer, dollar cost averaging and portfolio 
    rebalancing features, and the tax status of the features. Applicants 
    represent that the Company will maintain at its home office, and make 
    available to the Commission upon request, a memorandum detailing the 
    methodology used in, and the results of, the Applicants' comparative 
    survey.
        6. The Company also represents that the mortality risk charge of 
    0.10% imposed on the Contracts for the enhanced death benefit is 
    reasonable in relation to the risks assumed by the Company under the 
    Contracts. In arriving at this determination, the Company conducted a 
    large number of trials at various issue ages to determine the expected 
    cost of the enhanced death benefit.
        First, hypothetical asset returns were projected using generally 
    accepted actuarial simulation methods. For each asset return pattern 
    thus generated, hypothetical accumulated values were calculated by 
    applying the projected asset returns to the initial value in a 
    hypothetical account. Each accumulated value so calculated was then 
    compared to the amount of the enhanced death benefit payable in the 
    event of the hypothetical Contract owner's death during the year in 
    question. By analyzing the results of several thousand such 
    simulations, the Company was able to determine actuarially the level 
    cost of providing the enhanced death benefit. Based on this analysis, 
    the Company determined that a mortality risk charge of 0.10% was a 
    reasonable charge for providing the enhanced death benefit. Applicants 
    represent that the Company will maintain at its home office, and make 
    available to the Commission upon request, a memorandum detailing the 
    methodology used in, and the results of, the Applicants' comparative 
    survey.
        7. Applicants acknowledge that the withdrawal charge may be 
    insufficient to cover all costs relating to the distribution of the 
    Contracts. To the extent distribution costs are not covered by the 
    withdrawal charge, the Company will recover its distribution costs from 
    the assets of the general account. Those assets may include that 
    portion of the mortality and expense risk charge which is profit to the 
    Company.
        8. Applicants represent that the Company has concluded that there 
    is a reasonable likelihood that the distribution financing arrangement 
    proposed under the Contracts and Future Contracts will benefit the 
    Variable Account, the Future Accounts, Contract owners, and Future 
    Contract owners. The basis for these conclusions is set forth in a 
    memorandum which will be maintained by the Company at its home office 
    and will be made available to the Commission upon request.
        9. The Company represents that the Variable Account and any Future 
    Account will invest only in open-end management investment companies 
    which undertake, in the event companies should adopt a plan for 
    financing distribution expenses pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 
    Act, to have such plan formulated and approved by the company's board 
    of directors/trustees, a majority of whom are not interested persons of 
    the Company.
    
    [[Page 40679]]
    
    Conclusion
    
        Applicants assert that for the reasons and upon the facts set forth 
    above, the requested exemptions from Sections 26(a)(2)(C) and 27(c)(2) 
    of the 1940 Act are necessary and appropriate in the public interest 
    and consistent with the protection of investors and the purposes fairly 
    intended by the policy and provisions of the 1940 Act.
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Investment management, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 96-19841 Filed 8-2-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/05/1996
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of Application for Exemptions under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ``1940 Act'').
Document Number:
96-19841
Dates:
The application was filed June 7, 1996.
Pages:
40676-40679 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Rel. No. IC-22109, File No. 812-9672
PDF File:
96-19841.pdf