96-19863. Sugar From France: Final Results of Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and Revocation in Part of Antidumping Duty Finding  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 151 (Monday, August 5, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 40609-40610]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-19863]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    [A-427-078]
    
    
    Sugar From France: Final Results of Changed Circumstances 
    Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and Revocation in Part of 
    Antidumping Duty Finding
    
    AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
    Department of Commerce.
    
    ACTION: Notice of final results of changed circumstances antidumping 
    duty administrative review, and revocation in part of antidumping duty 
    finding.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: In response to a request made on March 12, 1996, by Boiron-
    Borneman, Inc. (Boiron), the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
    simultaneously initiated a changed circumstances antidumping duty 
    administrative review and issued the preliminary results of this review 
    expressing an intent to revoke in part the finding on sugar from 
    France. The scope of the finding currently includes sugar, both raw and 
    refined, with the exception of specialty sugars. See Sugar From 
    Belgium, France, and the Federal Republic of Germany; Finding of 
    Dumping, 44 FR 33878 (June 13, 1979), and Memorandum For Dick Moreland 
    From Frank R. Brennan (June 1, 1982). In accordance with sections 
    751(b) and (d) and 782(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act), and 19 
    CFR 353.25(d)(1)(i), we are now revoking in part this finding, with 
    regard to homeopathic sugar pellets, based on the fact that domestic 
    parties have expressed no interest in maintaining the finding on 
    homeopathic sugar pellets produced in France.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: August 5, 1996.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew Blaskovich or Zev Primor, 
    Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
    Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., 
    Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone (202) 482-5831/4114.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        On March 12, 1996, Boiron-Borneman, Inc. (Boiron), requested that 
    the Department conduct a changed circumstances administrative review to 
    determine whether to revoke the finding with regard to sugar pellets. 
    The finding with regard to imports of other sugar products is not 
    affected by this request. In addition, on February 26, 1996, the 
    Florida Sugar Marketing and Terminal Association, Inc. (the petitioner) 
    informed the Department in writing that it did not object to the 
    changed circumstances review and had no interest in maintaining the 
    finding on homeopathic sugar pellets produced in France.
        We preliminarily determined that petitioner's affirmative statement 
    of no interest constituted good cause for conducting a changed 
    circumstances review. Consequently, on May 6, 1996, the Department 
    published a notice of initiation and preliminary results of changed 
    circumstances antidumping duty administrative review to determine 
    whether to revoke this finding in part (61 FR 20236). We gave 
    interested parties an opportunity to comment on the preliminary results 
    of this changed circumstances review.
    
    The Applicable Statute
    
        Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the Act, as amended, 
    are references to the provisions effective January 1, 1995, the 
    effective date of the amendments made to the Act by the Uruguay Round 
    Agreements Act (URAA). In addition, unless otherwise indicated, all 
    citations to the Department's regulations are to the current 
    regulations, as amended by the interim regulations published in the 
    Federal Register on May 11, 1995 (60 FR 25130).
    
    Scope of Review
    
        The final antidumping finding on sugar from France covers raw and 
    refined sugar (44 FR 8949 (February 12, 1979)). The petition, filed by 
    the Florida Sugar Marketing & Terminal Assn., Inc., on July 3, 1978, 
    states that ``[t]he product being imported and which is the subject of 
    this petition, is raw and refined, semi-refined or ``off-white'' sugar 
    produced from sugar beets. Raw beet sugar and raw cane sugar are very 
    similar chemically and nutritionally, with the result that they are 
    interchangeable in terms of meeting refiners' needs for raw sugar.'' 
    See Petition of Florida Sugar Marketing & Terminal Assn., Inc., July 3, 
    1978, at 7. Excluded from the finding are specialty sugars. Imports of 
    the merchandise subject to the finding are currently classifiable under 
    various subprovisions of item number 1701.91 of the Harmonized Tariff 
    Schedule of the United States (HTS). HTS item numbers are provided for 
    convenience and for Customs purposes. This written description remains 
    dispositive.
        The merchandise covered by this changed circumstances review 
    includes homeopathic sugar pellets meeting the following criteria: (1) 
    Composed of 85 percent sucrose and 15 percent lactose; (2) have a 
    polished, matte appearance, and more uniformly porous than domestic 
    sugar cubes; (3) produced in two sizes of 2 mm and 3.8 mm in diameter. 
    According to a May 1990 letter ruling from Customs and a September 1990 
    Presidential Decree, imports of homeopathic sugar pellets enter under 
    HTS item number 1701.99.02.
    
    Final Results of Review; Partial Revocation of Antidumping Duty Finding
    
        On May 20, 1996, the United States Cane Sugar Refiners' Association 
    (USCSRA), an interested party in this review objected to the relief 
    requested by Boiron in its request for a changed circumstances 
    administrative review. The USCSRA claimed that there was a strong 
    likelihood that Boiron would circumvent the antidumping finding and, 
    thereby, U.S. refiners of cane sugar would face injury in the U.S. 
    market. See the USCSRA's letter of May 20, 1996, at 2. Upon further 
    consideration, the USCSRA withdrew its opposition to revocation of the 
    antidumping finding with respect to homeopathic sugar pellets. We 
    received no other comments objecting to revocation of the finding with 
    regard to Boiron's sugar pellets.
        The affirmative statement of no interest by petitioners in this 
    case constitutes changed circumstances sufficient to warrant partial 
    revocation of this finding. Therefore, the Department is partially 
    revoking this
    
    [[Page 40610]]
    
    finding on sugar from France, with regard to homeopathic sugar pellets, 
    in accordance with sections 751(b) and (d) and 782(h) of the Act, and 
    19 CFR 353.25(d)(1)(i). This partial revocation applies to all entries 
    of the merchandise subject to this changed circumstances review entered 
    or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after June 1, 1994.
        The Department will instruct the U.S. Customs Service (Customs) to 
    proceed with liquidation, without regard to antidumping duties, of all 
    unliquidated entries of homeopathic sugar pellets from France entered, 
    or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after June 1, 1994. 
    The Department will further instruct Customs to refund with interest 
    any estimated duties collected with respect to unliquidated entries of 
    homeopathic sugar pellets from France entered, or withdrawn from 
    warehouse, for consumption on or after June 1, 1994, in accordance with 
    Section 778 of the Act.
        This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
    administrative protection orders (APOs) of their responsibility 
    concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
    APO in accordance with 19 CFR 353.34(d). Timely written notification of 
    the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial 
    protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the 
    regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
        This changed circumstances administrative review, partial 
    revocation of the antidumping duty finding and notice are in accordance 
    with sections 751(b) and (d) and 782(h) of the Act and sections 
    353.22(f) and 353.25(d) of the Department's regulations.
    
        Dated: July 29, 1996.
    Robert S. LaRussa,
    Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
    [FR Doc. 96-19863 Filed 8-2-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
8/5/1996
Published:
08/05/1996
Department:
Commerce Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of final results of changed circumstances antidumping duty administrative review, and revocation in part of antidumping duty finding.
Document Number:
96-19863
Dates:
August 5, 1996.
Pages:
40609-40610 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
A-427-078
PDF File:
96-19863.pdf