[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 150 (Tuesday, August 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42117-42118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-20527]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP97-563-000]
Michigan Gas Storage Company; Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Cranberry Lake Lateral 63
East Project and Request for Comments on Environmental Issues
July 30, 1997.
The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an environmental assessment (EA) that will
discuss the environmental impacts of the construction and operation of
the facilities proposed in the Cranberry Lake Lateral 63 East
Project.\1\ This EA will be used by the Commission in its decision-
making process to determine whether the project is in the public
convenience and necessity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Michigan Gas Storage Company's application was filed with
the Commission under Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act and Part 157
of the Commission's regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of the Proposed Project
Michigan Gas Storage Company (MGSCo) proposes to replace and
upgrade 1.3 miles of its Cranberry Lake Lateral 63 East. To accomplish
this activity MGSCo proposes to: (1) Remove 0.6 mile of 6-inch-diameter
piping and replace it in the same trench with 8-inch-diameter piping;
(2) abandon in place 0.1 mile of 4-inch-diameter piping; (3) install a
2-inch-diameter pipe within the abandoned 4-inch-diameter pipe; (4)
upgrade the existing 0.6 mile of 8-inch-diameter pipeline to make it
piggable by removing stab-in branch connections at well laterals as
well as any other obstructions from the pipe interior; and (5) install
a pig launcher and pig receiver at either end of the reconfigured 8-
inch-diameter piping segment. The resulting lateral would consist of
about 1.2 miles of 8-inch-diameter and 0.1 mile of 2-inch-diameter
piping.
All of the facilities are located in Clare County, Michigan. The
proposed project would allow for more efficient and safe operation of
MGSCo's Cranberry Lake Storage Field.
The proposed facilities would cost about $257,400.
The general location of the project facilities is shown in appendix
1.\2\ If you are interested in obtaining procedural information, please
write to the Secretary of the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The appendices referenced in this notice are not being
printed in the Federal Register. Copies are available from the
Commission's Public Reference and Files Maintenance Branch, 888
First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, or call (202) 208-1371.
Copies of the appendices were sent to all those receiving this
notice in the mail.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Land Requirements for Construction
Replacement and upgrading of the Cranberry Lake Lateral 63 East,
including temporary work spaces, would require about 3.5 acres. Of the
3.5 acres, about 1.7 acres exist as a two-track sand road which has no
vegetation. Of the remaining 1.8 acres, about 1.7 acres of land would
require tree trimming and vegetation removal and about 0.1 acre of land
would require tree removal.
MGSCo would utilize its abandoned Plant 1 Compressor Station for
receiving and distributing materials during construction. The total
acreage for the lay-down area is about 3 acres. This area has been
previously devoted to industrial used and no further disturbance is
required
The EA Process
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires the
Commission to take into account the environmental impacts that could
result from an action whenever it considers the issuance of a
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. NEPA also requires us
to discover and address concerns the public may have about proposals.
We call this ``scoping''. The main goal of the scoping process is to
focus the analysis in the EA on the important environmental issues. By
this Notice of Intent, the Commission requests public comments on the
scope of the issues it will address in the EA. All comments received
are considered during the preparation of the EA. State and local
government representatives are encouraged to notify their constituents
of this proposed action and encourage them to comment on their areas of
concern.
The EA will discuss impacts that could occur as a result of the
construction and operation of the proposed project under these general
headings:
Geology and soils
Land use
Water resources, fisheries, and wetlands
Cultural resources
Vegetation and wildlife
Endangered and threatened species
Public safety
We will also evaluate possible alternatives to the proposed project
or portions of the project, and make recommendations on how to lessen
or avoid impacts on the various resource areas.
Our independent analysis of the issues will be in the EA. Depending
on the comments received during the scoping process, the EA may be
published and mailed to Federal, state, and local agencies, public
interest groups, interested individuals, affected landowners,
newspapers, libraries, and the Commission's official service list for
this proceeding. A comment period will be allotted for review if the EA
is published. We will consider all comments on the EA before we make
our recommendations to the Commission.
Currently Identified Environmental Issues
We have already identified several issues that we think deserve
attention based on a preliminary review of the proposed facilities and
the environmental information provided by MGSCo. This preliminary list
of issues may be changed based on your comments and our analysis.
Cranberry Lake Lateral 63 East is located near the Kirkland's
Warbler National Wildlife Refuge.
Cranberry Lake Lateral 63 East is located within the Gladwin
Forest Area of the Au Sable State Forest.
Public Participation
You can make a difference by sending a letter addressing your
specific comments or concerns about the project. You should focus on
the potential environmental effects of the proposal, alternatives to
the proposal (including alternative routes), and measures to avoid or
lessen environmental impact. The more specific your comments, the more
useful they will be. Please follow the instructions below to ensure
that your comments are received and properly recorded:
[[Page 42118]]
Send two copies of your letter to: Lois Cashell, Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., N.E., Room 1A,
Washington, D.C., 20426;
Label one of the comments for the attention of the
Environmental Review and Compliance Branch, PR-11.2;
Reference Docket No. CP97-563-000; and
Mail your comments so that they will be received in
Washington, D.C. on or before August 30, 1997.
Becoming an Intervenor
In addition to involvement in the EA scoping process, you may want
to become an official party to the proceeding or become an
``intervenor''. Among other things, intervenors have the right to
receive copies of case-related Commission documents and filings by
other intervenors. Likewise, each intervenor must provide copies of its
filings to all other parties. If you want to become an intervenor you
must file a motion to intervene according to Rule 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214) (see
appendix 2).
The date for filing timely motions to intervene in this proceeding
has passed. Therefore, parties not seeking to file late interventions
must show good cause, as required by Sec. 385.214(b)(3), why this time
limitation should be waived. Environmental issues have been viewed as
good cause for late intervention.
You do not need intervenor status to have your scoping comments
considered.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-20527 Filed 8-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
