2024-17240. Privacy Act Regulations; Exemption for the Law Enforcement Records Management System

Document Headings

Document headings vary by document type but may contain the following:

1. the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
2. the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to
3. the agency docket number / agency internal file number
4. the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions

See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details.

Department of the Interior

Office of the Secretary

1. 43 CFR Part 2
2. [DOI-2023-0027;DS65100000 DWSN00000.000000 24XD4523WS DP.65102]
3. RIN 1090-AB28

AGENCY:

Office of the Secretary, Interior.

ACTION:

Final rule.

SUMMARY:

The Department of the Interior (DOI) is issuing a final rule to amend its regulations to exempt certain records in the INTERIOR/DOI-10, DOI Law Enforcement Records Management System (LE RMS), system of records from one or more provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974 because of criminal, civil, and administrative law enforcement requirements.

DATES:

The final rule is effective August 6, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Teri Barnett, Departmental Privacy Officer, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street NW, Room 7112, Washington, DC 20240, [e-mail] or [phone].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

DOI published a system of records notice (SORN) in the Federal Register at 89 FR 1594 (January 10, 2024) to update the title of the modified system of records to INTERIOR/DOI-10, DOI Law Enforcement Records Management System (LE RMS), propose new and modified routine uses, and reflect the expanded scope of the Department-wide law enforcement system of records. A notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) was also published in the Federal Register at 89 FR 1505 (January 10, 2024) to propose amendments to DOI's Privacy Act exemptions at 43 CFR 2.254 to update subsections (a) and (c) to reflect the new title of the system and to add new paragraphs under subsections (b), (d), (e), and (f) to claim additional exemptions pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1), (k)(3), (k)(5), and (k)(6). The Department proposed these changes because this system of records contains material that support law enforcement activities and investigations. Comments were invited on both the INTERIOR/DOI-10, DOI Law Enforcement Records Management System (LE RMS) SORN and NPRM. DOI received no comments on the SORN and NPRM; therefore, the NPRM will be implemented as proposed.

Procedural Requirements

1. Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866, 14094 and 13563)

Executive Order 14094 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866 and E.O. 13563 and states that regulatory analysis should facilitate agency efforts to develop regulations that serve the public interest, advance statutory objectives, and are consistent with E.O. 12866, E.O. 13563, and the Presidential Memorandum of January 20, 2021 (Modernizing Regulatory Review). Regulatory analysis, as practicable and appropriate, shall recognize distributive impacts and equity, to the extent permitted by law. E.O. 13563 emphasizes further that regulations must be based on the best available science and that the rulemaking process must allow for public participation and an open exchange of ideas. We have developed this final rule in a manner consistent with these requirements.

E.O. 12866, as reaffirmed by E.O. 13563 and E.O. 14094, provides that the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) in the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) will review all significant rules. OIRA has determined that this rule is not significant.

2. Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Department of the Interior certifies that this document will not have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121)). This rule does not impose a requirement for small businesses to report or keep records on any of the requirements contained in this rule. The exemptions to the Privacy Act apply to individuals, and individuals are not covered entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

3. Congressional Review Act

This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This rule:

(a) Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more.

(b) Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic regions.

(c) Does not have significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of United States-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.

4. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or Tribal governments in the aggregate, or on the private sector, of more than $100 million per year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on State, local, or Tribal governments or the private sector. This rule makes only minor changes to 43 CFR part 2. A statement containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) is not required.

5. Takings (E.O. 12630)

In accordance with Executive Order 12630, this rule will not have significant takings implications. This rule makes only minor changes to 43 CFR part 2. A takings implication assessment is not required.

6. Federalism (E.O. 13132)

In accordance with Executive Order 13132, this rule does not have any federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment. The rule is not associated with, nor will it have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. A federalism assessment is not required.

7. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)

This rule complies with the requirements of Executive Order 12988. Specifically, this rule:

(a) Does not unduly burden the Federal judicial system.

(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be written to minimize litigation; and

(c) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal standards.

8. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175)

In accordance with Executive Order 13175, the Department of the Interior has evaluated this rule and determined that it would have no substantial effects on federally recognized Indian Tribes.

9. Paperwork Reduction Act

This rule does not require an information collection from 10 or more parties and a submission under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.) is not required.

10. National Environmental Policy Act

This rule does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality for the human environment. A detailed statement under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq., is not required because the rule is covered by a categorical exclusion. We have determined the rule is categorically excluded under 43 CFR 46.210(i) because it is administrative, legal, and technical in nature. We also have determined the rule does not involve any of the extraordinary circumstances listed in 43 CFR 46.215 that would require further analysis under NEPA.

11. Effects on Energy Supply (E.O. 13211)

This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition in Executive Order 13211. A Statement of Energy Effects is not required.

12. Clarity of This Regulation

We are required by Executive Order 12866 and 12988, the Plain Writing Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-274), and the Presidential Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain language. This means each rule we publish must:

—Be logically organized;

—Use the active voice to address readers directly;

—Use clear language rather than jargon;

—Be divided into short sections and sentences; and

—Use lists and table wherever possible.

List of Subjects in 43 CFR Part 2

• Administrative practice and procedure
• Confidential information
• Courts
• Freedom of Information Act
• Privacy Act

For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of the Interior is amending 43 CFR part 2 as follows:

PART 2—FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT; RECORDS AND TESTIMONY

1. The authority citation for part 2 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552a, 553; 31 U.S.C. 3717; 43 U.S.C. 1460, 1461, the Social Security Number Fraud Prevention Act of 2017, Pub. L. 115-59, September 15, 2017.

2. Amend § 2.254 by:

a. Revising paragraph (a)(5);

b. Adding paragraph (b)(4);

c. Revising paragraph (c)(15); and

d. Adding paragraphs (d)(4), (e)(9), and (f)(2).

The additions and revisions read as follows:

§ 2.254

Exemptions.

* * * * *

(a) * * *

(5) INTERIOR/DOI-10, DOI Law Enforcement Records Management System (LE RMS).

(b) * * *

(4) INTERIOR/DOI-10, DOI Law Enforcement Records Management System (LE RMS).

(c) * * *

(15) INTERIOR/DOI-10, DOI Law Enforcement Records Management System (LE RMS).

(d) * * *

(4) INTERIOR/DOI-10, DOI Law Enforcement Records Management System (LE RMS).

(e) * * *

(9) INTERIOR/DOI-10, DOI Law Enforcement Records Management System (LE RMS).

(f) * * *

(2) INTERIOR/DOI-10, DOI Law Enforcement Records Management System (LE RMS).

* * * * *

Teri Barnett.

Departmental Privacy Officer, U.S. Department of the Interior.