96-20118. Georgia Power Company, et al. (Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2); Exemption  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 153 (Wednesday, August 7, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 41186-41187]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-20118]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [Docket Nos. 50-321 and 50-366]
    
    
    Georgia Power Company, et al. (Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, 
    Units 1 and 2); Exemption
    
    I
    
        The Georgia Power Company, et al. (GPC or the licensee) is the 
    holder of Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-57 and NPF-5 for the 
    Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (Hatch). The licenses 
    provide, among other things, that the licensee is subject to all rules, 
    regulations, and orders of the Commission now or hereafter in effect.
    
    II
    
        Subsection (a) of 10 CFR 70.24, ``Criticality Accident 
    Requirements,'' requires that each licensee authorized to possess 
    special nuclear material (SNM) shall maintain in each area where such 
    material is handled, used, or stored, an appropriate criticality 
    monitoring system. In accordance with Subsection (a)(1) of 10 CFR 
    70.24, coverage of all such areas at Hatch shall be provided by two 
    criticality detectors. However, exemptions may be requested pursuant to 
    10 CFR 70.24(d), provided that the licensee believes that good cause 
    exists for the exemption.
        By letter dated June 4, 1996, the licensee requested an exemption 
    from the requirements of 10 CFR 70.24. Previous exemptions from the 
    provisions of 10 CFR Part 70.24 for the storage of special nuclear 
    material, including reactor fuel assemblies [maximum amount of 2,630 kg 
    of U-235 in uranium enriched to no more than 3.0 weight percent (w/o)], 
    were granted to Georgia Power Company for Hatch Unit 1 in NRC Materials 
    License No. SNM-1378, issued on August 2, 1973; and for Hatch Unit 2 in 
    NRC Materials License No. SNM-1772 issued on October 28, 1977, [maximum 
    amount of 1,950 kg of U-235 in uranium enriched
    
    [[Page 41187]]
    
    to no more than 2.3 weight percent (w/o)]. The materials licenses 
    expired upon conversion of the construction permits to operating 
    licenses, which were August 6, 1974, for Unit 1, and June 13, 1978, for 
    Hatch Unit 2. The basis for the current exemption request is the same 
    as for the original request. Specifically, the licensee proposes to 
    handle and store unirradiated fuel in the new fuel vault or the spent 
    fuel pool without having a criticality monitoring system as required by 
    10 CFR 70.24.
        The basis for the exemption is that the potential for accidental 
    criticality is precluded because of the geometric spacing of fuel in 
    the storage vault and administrative controls imposed on fuel handling 
    procedures from the time the fuel is removed from approved shipping 
    containers, until it is placed in specially designed storage racks.
        Inadvertent or accidental criticality of Special Nuclear Materials 
    (SNM) while in use in the reactor vessel is precluded through 
    compliance with the Hatch Technical Specifications, including 
    reactivity requirements (e.g., shutdown margins, limits on control rod 
    movement), instrumentation requirements (e.g., reactor power and 
    radiation monitors), and controls on refueling operations (e.g., 
    refueling equipment interlocks). In addition, the operators' attention 
    directed toward instruments monitoring behavior of the nuclear fuel in 
    the reactor assures the facility is operated in such a manner as to 
    preclude inadvertent criticality. Finally, since access to the fuel in 
    the reactor vessel is not physically possible while in use and is 
    procedurally controlled during refueling, there are no concerns 
    associated with loss or diversion of the fuel.
        SNM as a nuclear fuel is stored in one of two locations--the spent 
    fuel pool or the new fuel vault. The spent fuel pool is used to store 
    irradiated fuel under water after its removal from the reactor. The 
    pool is designed to store fuel in a geometric array that precludes 
    criticality. In addition, existing Technical Specification limits on 
    keff are maintained less than or equal to 0.95, even in the event 
    of a fuel handling accident.
        The new fuel vault is used to receive and store new fuel in a dry 
    condition upon arrival on site and prior to loading in the reactor. The 
    new fuel vault is designed to store new fuel in a geometric array that 
    precludes criticality. In addition, existing safety evaluations 
    demonstrate that an effective multiplication factor is maintained less 
    than or equal to 0.95 when the new fuel racks are fully loaded and dry 
    or flooded with unborated water, or in the event of a fuel handling 
    accident.
        New fuel is shipped in a plastic wrap. When the fuel is removed 
    from its transportation cask, the wrap is removed and the fuel is 
    placed in the fuel inspection stand. Following inspection, the new fuel 
    can either be placed in the new fuel storage vault or in the spent fuel 
    pool (typically placed in the spent fuel pool). In no case is the 
    plastic wrap reinserted on the fuel. Removal of the wrap requires it to 
    be slit down the length of the new fuel assembly, thereby making its 
    reuse highly unlikely. Therefore, there is no concern that the plastic 
    wrap used as part of the new fuel package will be capable of holding 
    water from flooding from overhead sources. Additionally, as discussed 
    above, the new fuel storage racks were analyzed by the licensee for a 
    postulated flooded condition, and the results show that keff is 
    maintained less than or equal to 0.95.
        Both irradiated and unirradiated fuel is moved to and from the 
    reactor vessel and the spent fuel pool to accommodate refueling 
    operations. Also, unirradiated fuel can be moved to and from the new 
    fuel vault. In addition, fuel movements into the facility and within 
    the reactor vessel and the spent fuel pool occur. Fuel movements are 
    procedurally controlled and designed to preclude conditions involving 
    criticality concerns. Moreover, previous accident analyses demonstrate 
    that a fuel handling accident (i.e., a dropped fuel element) will not 
    create conditions that exceed design specifications. In addition, the 
    Technical Specifications and Technical Requirements Manuals 
    specifically address refueling operations and limit the handling of 
    fuel to ensure against an accidental criticality and preclude certain 
    movements over the spent fuel pool and the reactor vessel.
        Based upon the information provided, there is reasonable assurance 
    that irradiated and unirradiated fuel will remain subcritical. The 
    circumstances for granting an exemption to 10 CFR 70.24 are met because 
    criticality is precluded with the present design configuration, 
    Technical Specification requirements, administrative controls, and the 
    fuel handling equipment and procedures. Therefore, the staff concludes 
    that the licensee's request for an exemption from the requirements of 
    10 CFR 70.24 is acceptable and should be granted.
    
    III
    
        Accordingly, the Commission has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR 
    70.14, this exemption is authorized by law, will not endanger life or 
    property or the common defense and security, and is otherwise in the 
    public interest. Therefore, the Commission hereby grants Georgia Power 
    Company, et al., an exemption as described in Section II above from 10 
    CFR 70.24, ``Criticality Accident Requirements'' for Hatch Units 1 and 
    2.
        Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the Commission has determined that the 
    granting of this exemption will have no significant impact on the 
    quality of the human environment (61 FR 36914).
        This exemption is effective upon issuance.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 31st day of July 1996.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    William T. Russell,
    Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 96-20118 Filed 8-6-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/07/1996
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-20118
Pages:
41186-41187 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket Nos. 50-321 and 50-366
PDF File:
96-20118.pdf