94-19317. NOFA for Fair Housing Initiatives Program, Private Enforcement Initiative Special Project; FY 1994 Competitive Solicitation  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 152 (Tuesday, August 9, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-19317]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: August 9, 1994]
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    Part IV
    
    
    
    
    
    Department of Housing and Urban Development
    
    
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    Office of the Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal 
    Opportunity
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    Fair Housing Initiatives Program, Private Enforcement Initiative 
    Special Project; Fiscal Year 1994 Competitive Solicitation; Notice of 
    Funding Availability
    DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
    
    Office of the Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal 
    Opportunity
    [Docket No. N-94-3797; FR-3742-N-01]
    
     
    
    NOFA for Fair Housing Initiatives Program, Private Enforcement 
    Initiative Special Project; FY 1994 Competitive Solicitation
    
    AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal 
    Opportunity, HUD.
    
    ACTION: Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This NOFA announces the availability of up to $2 million of 
    1994 Fiscal Year (FY) funding for special projects to address property 
    insurance and mortgage lending discrimination under the Private 
    Enforcement Initiative of the Fair Housing Initiatives Program (FHIP). 
    FHIP assists projects and activities designed to enforce and enhance 
    compliance with the Fair Housing Act and substantially equivalent State 
    and local fair housing laws. In the body of this document is 
    information concerning the purpose of the NOFA, eligibility, available 
    amounts, selection criteria, how to apply for funding, and how 
    selections will be made.
    
    DATES: An application kit for funding under this Notice will be 
    available following publication of the Notice. The actual application 
    due date will be specified in the application kit. However, applicants 
    will be given at least 45 days from today's date, until September 23, 
    1994, to submit their applications. Applications will be accepted if 
    they are received on or before the application due date, or are 
    received within 7 days after the application due date, but with a U.S. 
    postmark or receipt from a private commercial delivery service (such 
    as, Federal Express or DHL) that is dated on or before the application 
    due date.
    
    ADDRESSES: To obtain a copy of the application kit, please write the 
    Fair Housing Information Clearinghouse, Post Office Box 6091, 
    Rockville, MD 20850 or call the toll free number 1-800-343-3442. Please 
    also contact this number if information concerning this NOFA is needed 
    in an accessible format.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacquelyn J. Shelton, Director, Office 
    of Fair Housing Initiatives and Voluntary Programs, Room 5234, 451 
    Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410-2000. Telephone number (202) 
    708-0800. A telecommunications device (TDD) for hearing and speech 
    impaired persons is available at (202) 708-0455. (These are not toll-
    free numbers.)
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
    
        Application requirements associated with this program have been 
    approved by the Office of Management and Budget, under section 3504(h) 
    of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3054(h)), and 
    assigned OMB control number 2529-0033.
    
    I. Purpose and Substantive Description
    
    (a) Authority
    
        Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 
    3601-19 (Fair Housing Act), charges the Secretary of Housing and Urban 
    Development with responsibility to accept and investigate complaints 
    alleging discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, 
    familial status or national origin in the sale, rental, or financing of 
    most housing and in other real estate-related transactions. In 
    addition, the Fair Housing Act directs the Secretary to coordinate 
    action with State and local agencies administering fair housing laws 
    and to cooperate with, and render technical assistance to, public or 
    private entities carrying out programs to prevent and eliminate 
    discriminatory housing practices.
        Section 561 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1987, 
    42 U.S.C. 3616 note, established the Fair Housing Initiatives Program 
    (FHIP) to strengthen the Department's enforcement of the Fair Housing 
    Act and to further fair housing. This program assists projects and 
    activities designed to enforce and enhance compliance with the Fair 
    Housing Act and substantially equivalent State and local fair housing 
    laws. Implementing regulations are found at 24 CFR part 125.
        Three general categories of activities were established at 24 CFR 
    part 125 for FHIP funding under section 561 of the Housing and 
    Community Development Act of 1987: the Administrative Enforcement 
    Initiative, the Education and Outreach Initiative, and the Private 
    Enforcement Initiative. Section 905 of the Housing and Community 
    Development Act of 1992 (HCDA 1992) (Pub. L. 102-550, approved October 
    28, 1992), amended section 561 by adding specific eligible applicants 
    and activities to the Education and Outreach and Private Enforcement 
    Initiatives, as well as an entirely new Fair Housing Organizations 
    Initiative.
        The program components of FHIP are described in the Catalog of 
    Federal Domestic Assistance at 14.408, Administrative Enforcement 
    Initiative; 14.409, Education and Outreach Initiative; 14.410, Private 
    Enforcement Initiative; and 14.413, Fair Housing Organizations 
    Initiative.
    
    (b) Allocation Amounts
    
        For FY 1994, the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and 
    Urban Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1994 
    (approved October 28, 1993, Pub. L. 103-124), (94 App. Act) 
    appropriated $20,481,000 for the FHIP program. Of this amount, 
    $2,000,000 of Private Enforcement Initiative funds are being made 
    available for the special projects announced in this NOFA. The 
    remaining $18,481,000 was made available in a NOFA published on May 16, 
    1994 (59 FR 25532) (technical correction published June 7, 1994, 59 FR 
    29432). The amounts included in this NOFA are subject to change based 
    on fund availability.
        Of the $2 million available under this NOFA, $1.5 million is 
    available for enforcement project applications that address any aspect 
    of property insurance discrimination cognizable under the Fair Housing 
    Act. Applications for property insurance projects should not exceed 
    $300,000. The remaining $500,000 is available for enforcement project 
    applications that address any aspect of mortgage lending discrimination 
    cognizable under the Fair Housing Act. Applications for mortgage 
    lending projects should not exceed $250,000.
        If the entire $2 million available is not awarded under this NOFA, 
    it may be used to fund additional applications under the FY 1994 FHIP 
    NOFA published on May 16, or it may be added to funds made available in 
    any FY 1995 FHIP NOFA that will be published. In addition, should HUD 
    determine, based upon the availability of funds and the number and 
    quality of applications in response to this NOFA, to fund additional 
    projects under this NOFA, up to $500,000 of FY 1995 Private Enforcement 
    Initiative funds will be made available to continue to make awards.
        (c) Eligibility. Eligible activities and applicants, and additional 
    requirements that apply to the Private Enforcement Initiative are 
    listed below. All activities and materials funded by FHIP must be 
    reasonably accessible to persons with disabilities.
        (1) Eligible applicants. Organizations that are eligible to receive 
    FY 1994 funding assistance under the Private Enforcement Initiative 
    are:
        (i) Qualified fair housing enforcement organizations. A qualified 
    fair housing organization is any organization, whether or not it is 
    solely engaged in fair housing enforcement activities, that:
        (A) Is organized as a private, tax-exempt, nonprofit, charitable 
    organization;
        (B) Has at least 2 years experience in complaint intake, complaint 
    investigation, testing for fair housing violations and enforcement of 
    meritorious claims; and
        (C) Is engaged in complaint intake, complaint investigation, 
    testing for fair housing violations and enforcement of meritorious 
    claims at the time of application for FHIP assistance.
        (ii) Fair housing enforcement organizations with at least 1 year of 
    experience in complaint intake, complaint investigation, testing for 
    fair housing violations and enforcement of meritorious claims. A fair 
    housing enforcement organization is an organization that:
        (A) Is organized as a private, tax-exempt, nonprofit, charitable 
    organization;
        (B) Is currently engaged in complaint intake, complaint 
    investigation, testing for fair housing violations and enforcement of 
    meritorious claims; and
        (C) Upon the receipt of FHIP funds will continue to be engaged in 
    complaint intake, complaint investigation, testing for fair housing 
    violations and enforcement of meritorious claims.
        (2) Eligible Activities.
        (i) Property insurance discrimination. A total of $1.5 million is 
    available for enforcement project applications that address any aspect 
    of property insurance discrimination cognizable under the Fair Housing 
    Act. Project applications should not exceed $300,000. All testing 
    projects under this NOFA must include other investigative activities in 
    addition to testing. All projects must provide for administrative or 
    judicial enforcement activities to follow for any unlawful 
    discrimination that is disclosed. The following activities are provided 
    as examples of eligible activities:
        (A) Applicants can propose testing and other investigative 
    activities to compare accepted and rejected property insurance 
    applications and determine whether race/ethnicity of the applicant and/
    or the community where the property was located, or the age of the 
    property was a factor in the rejection. Project applications may 
    address the issuance, renewal, non-renewal or cancellation of policies 
    by insurance companies, independent agents, captive agents or any other 
    provider of property insurance. Activities may include comparisons of 
    terms and conditions, such as the extent of coverage, premiums charged, 
    terms of payment, property inspection requirements and discounts 
    offered to insurance applicants that result in unlawful discrimination. 
    Other investigative activities, in addition to testing, may include 
    obtaining for use in administrative or judicial enforcement activities:
        (1) Evidence (testimony or documents of disparate treatment or 
    disparate impact) from current or former agents and other employees of 
    insurance companies;
        (2) Evidence (testimony or documents of disparate treatment or 
    disparate impact) from current or former policyholders;
        (3) Discovery made available in other lawsuits against insurance 
    companies;
        (4) Insurance testing data gathered by other organizations;
        (5) Industry expert testimony on property insurance discrimination;
        (6) Market conduct examinations;
        (7) Equal employment opportunity data on the number of minority 
    agents, supervisors, management officials, and officers;
        (8) Information on the current and former locations of insurance 
    agencies, including main offices, branch offices and agents, compared 
    to racial/ethnic data at the time of establishment, movement or 
    closure;
        (9) Data on sales and marketing practices;
        (10) Data which indicate the discriminatory racial impact of 
    selected underwriting and other sales and marketing practices, e.g. age 
    and minimum coverage requirements; and
        (11) Complaints filed with state insurance commissioners, public or 
    private civil rights agencies, and other fair housing groups.
        (B) Applicants can propose to pursue litigation and litigation 
    support activities for cases in which evidence of discrimination in 
    property insurance has already been secured through previously 
    conducted testing and other investigative activities. Litigation 
    support activities may include, for example, obtaining and/or providing 
    a complainant, an enforcement agency, HUD, and/or the Department of 
    Justice with testimony and evidence relevant to a particular case being 
    heard before an Administrative Law Judge or in a Federal Court.
        (C) Applicants can propose to analyze multi-year data on the 
    geographic distribution of policies, location of offices and agents and 
    marketing policies of insurance companies as they relate to the racial 
    composition of a particular metropolitan area to determine whether such 
    placement and marketing procedures result in a discriminatory impact on 
    minorities.
        (ii) Mortgage lending discrimination. A total of $500,000 is 
    available for enforcement project applications that address any aspect 
    of mortgage lending discrimination cognizable under the Fair Housing 
    Act. Project applications should not exceed $250,000. All testing 
    projects under the NOFA must include other investigative activities in 
    addition to testing. All projects must provide for administrative or 
    judicial enforcement activities to follow for any unlawful 
    discrimination that is disclosed. The following are provided as 
    examples of eligible activities:
        (A) Applicants can propose to conduct an in-depth examination of a 
    particular geographic area, identified in the application, with a 
    diverse population that is separated into discrete, racially 
    identifiable sections, to determine the presence and extent of 
    discriminatory mortgage lending practices in the area. The examination 
    must not be based solely on Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data. 
    Discriminatory mortgage lending practices may be those which are 
    subject to an impact analysis, such as the effect of a minimum loan 
    amount on the ability of protected classes to obtain financing or the 
    application of underwriting criteria which have the effect of 
    discriminating against minorities. Such criteria could include, for 
    example, the failure of the lender to accept cash on hand in lieu of a 
    bank statement; denial of a loan because the applicant has no credit 
    history, banking or checking account, credit accounts, credit cards, 
    etc.; tiered pricing of mortgage costs based on the amount of the loan, 
    the age or location of the property; and failure to gross up taxable 
    and non-taxable income in calculating debt to income ratios.
        (B) Applicants can propose to examine the interrelationship of 
    various discriminatory mortgage lending practices and their role in 
    creating geographic areas that are separated into discrete, racially 
    identifiable sections. This includes, for example, discriminatory 
    marketing practices; discriminatory appraisals; discriminatory 
    underwriting criteria; overt differences in treatment; and the effects 
    of discriminatory practices of financial institutions, such as 
    discriminatory appraisals, on the ability of other institutions to 
    operate in a manner that does not have a discriminatory effect. Also 
    included as discriminatory practices for examination are secondary 
    market policies and practices; underwriting criteria which have a 
    disparate impact; and discriminatory lender practices, such as minimum 
    loan amounts, compensation practices, overages and other practices that 
    have a disparate impact upon a protected class.
        (C) Applicants can propose to pursue litigation and litigation 
    support activities for cases in which documentation of discrimination 
    in mortgage lending has already been secured through previously 
    conducted testing and other investigative activities. Litigation 
    support activities may include, for example, obtaining and/or providing 
    a complainant, an enforcement agency, HUD, and/or the Department of 
    Justice with testimony and evidence relevant to a particular case being 
    heard before an Administrative Law Judge or in a Federal Court.
        (D) Applicants can propose testing and other investigatory 
    activities in connection with any of the above activities. Other 
    investigative activities, in addition to testing, may include obtaining 
    for use in administrative or judicial enforcement activities:
        (1) Evidence (testimony or documents of disparate treatment or 
    disparate impact) from current or former agents and other employees of 
    mortgage lending companies;
        (2) Discovery made available in other lawsuits against mortgage 
    lending companies;
        (3) Mortgage lending testing data gathered by other organizations;
        (4) Industry expert testimony on mortgage lending discrimination;
        (5) Market conduct examinations;
        (6) Equal employment opportunity data on the number of minority 
    loan officers, supervisors and management officials;
        (7) Information of the current and former locations of mortgage 
    lending companies;
        (8) Data on sales and marketing practices; and
        (9) Demographic data which indicate the discriminatory racial/
    ethnic impact of underwriting criteria.
        (iii) Additional requirements.
        (A) Applications are solicited for project proposals not to exceed 
    18 months in implementation. For projects more than 12 months in 
    duration, the proposal must include a verbal briefing to HUD officials 
    after nine months of project implementation.
        (B) Applicants may propose to do an interrelated project that 
    includes discrimination in mortgage lending and discrimination in 
    property insurance. However, such applications cannot exceed maximum 
    amounts established under the individual categories. Further, 
    applicants must identify the category under which they wish such 
    proposals to be considered.
        (C) Applications must include activities that will provide:
        (1) Detailed documentation of the findings that support the 
    project's conclusions, and of the raw data that were used for analysis 
    and determination;
        (2) Detailed characteristics of the targeted community and any 
    selected comparison site, showing the significant factors that were 
    used to determine comparability and the source of the information used 
    to identify these characteristics and factors;
        (3) A detailed implementation guide for replication and use in 
    other areas, including an explanation of methodology (e.g., how to 
    compare accepted and rejected applications to determine whether race or 
    other prohibited basis was a factor in the rejection; what to look for 
    when doing on-site property visits; or how to establish discriminatory 
    impact, providing detailed characteristics of the specific practice and 
    showing the significant factors that were used to determine whether the 
    practice had a discriminatory impact, and the source of the information 
    used to identify these characteristics and factors) and detailed 
    guidance on how to analyze data obtained using the methodology.
        (D) Testers in testing activities funded with Private Enforcement 
    Initiative funds must not have prior felony convictions or convictions 
    of crimes involving fraud or perjury, and they must receive training or 
    be experienced in testing procedures and techniques.
        (E) Projects that appear to be aimed solely or primarily at 
    research or data-gathering unrelated to existing or planned fair 
    housing enforcement programs will not be approved. Data-gathering 
    activities will require OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act 
    before commencement of the activity.
        (F) In accordance with 24 CFR 125.404, no recipient of assistance 
    under the Private Enforcement Initiative may use any funds provided by 
    the Department for the payment of expenses in connection with 
    litigation against the United States.
        (G) Recipients of funds under the Private Enforcement Initiative 
    shall be required to record, in a case tracking log (or Fair Housing 
    Enforcement Log) to be supplied by HUD, information appropriate to the 
    funded project relating to the number of complaints of discrimination 
    received; the basis of these complaints; the type and number of tests 
    utilized in the investigation of each allegation; the time for case 
    processing, including administrative or judicial proceedings; the cost 
    of testing activities and case processing; and case outcome or relief 
    provided. The recipient must agree to make this log available to HUD.
    
    (d) Selection Criteria/Ranking Factors
    
    (1) Selection Criteria for Ranking Applications for Assistance
        All projects proposed in applications will be ranked on the basis 
    of the following criteria for selection:
        (i) The anticipated impact of the project proposed on the concerns 
    identified in the application. (20 points) In determining the 
    anticipated impact of the proposed project, HUD will consider the 
    degree to which a proposed project addresses problems and issues that 
    are significant fair housing problems and issues, as explained in the 
    application, or based upon other information available to HUD. (The 
    clarity and thoroughness of the project description can be considered 
    in this determination.) This criterion will be judged on the basis of 
    the applicant's submissions in response to paragraph III.(a)(1) of this 
    NOFA under the heading ``Checklist of Application Submission 
    Requirements.''
        (ii) The extent to which the project will provide benefits in 
    support of fair housing after funded activities have been completed. 
    (20 points) In determining the extent to which the project will provide 
    benefits after funded activities have been completed, HUD will consider 
    the degree to which the project will be of continuing use in dealing 
    with housing discrimination after funded activities have been 
    completed. This criterion will be judged on the basis of the 
    applicant's submissions in response to paragraph III. (a)(6) and 
    III.(a)(7) of this NOFA under the heading ``Checklist of Application 
    Submission Requirements.''
        (iii) The extent to which the project will provide the maximum 
    impact on the concerns identified in a cost-effective manner. (20 
    points) In determining the extent to which the project will provide the 
    maximum impact on the concerns identified in a cost effective manner, 
    HUD will consider the quality and reasonableness of the proposed 
    activities, timeline and budget for implementation and completion of 
    the project. HUD will consider as well the adequacy and clarity of 
    proposed procedures to be used by the agency for measuring the actual 
    results against the intended results of the project and ensuring its 
    timely completion. These procedures may consist of a system for 
    checking whether or not the milestones established by the project's 
    timeline are being met. The applicant's capability in handling 
    financial resources (e.g., adequate financial control procedures, 
    accounting procedures) will be taken into account as part of the 
    assessment. This may be evidenced by the applicant's financial 
    management of previous FHIP or other civil rights project management, a 
    certification from cognizant auditor, and other documentation. This 
    criterion will be judged on the basis of the applicant's submissions in 
    response to paragraphs III.(a)(2), and III.(a)(5) of this NOFA under 
    the heading ``Checklist of Application Submission Requirements.''
        (iv) The extent to which the applicant's professional and 
    organizational experience will further the achievement of project 
    goals. (30 points) In determining the extent to which the applicant's 
    professional and organizational experience will further the achievement 
    of the project's goals, HUD will consider the applicant's experience in 
    formulating and carrying out programs to prevent or eliminate 
    discriminatory practices (especially programs addressing discrimination 
    in financing, insurance, or other real-estate related transactions), 
    including the applicant's management of past and current FHIP or other 
    civil rights projects, the experience and qualifications of existing 
    personnel identified for key positions, or a description of the 
    qualifications of new staff that will be hired, including 
    subcontractors/consultants. This criterion will be judged on the basis 
    of the applicant's submissions in response to paragraph III.(a)(3) of 
    this NOFA under the heading ``Checklist of Application Submission 
    Requirements.''
        (v) The extent to which the project utilizes other public or 
    private resources that may be available. (10 points). Both monetary and 
    in-kind resources identified in the application are eligible for 
    determining the extent to which other public or private resources are 
    available. The resources that will be considered must be targeted 
    specifically for the proposed project, and must be over and above the 
    resources available to the applicant as a part of its usual, non-
    project operations for such expenses as salaries, equipment, supplies, 
    and rent. This criterion will be judged on the basis of the applicant's 
    submissions in response to paragraph III.(a)(4) of this NOFA under the 
    heading ``Checklist of Application Submission Requirements.''
    (2) Selection Process
        Each application for funding will be evaluated competitively, and 
    awarded points based on the Selection Criteria for Ranking Applications 
    for Assistance identified in section I.(d)(1) of this NOFA. The final 
    decision rests with the Assistant Secretary or designee. After eligible 
    applications are evaluated against the factors for award and assigned a 
    score, they will be organized by rank order. Applications will be 
    funded in rank order until all available funds have been obligated, or 
    until there are no acceptable applications.
    (3) Cost Factors
        The Department expects to fund multiple applications as a result of 
    this NOFA. At some point, however, two or more complete and eligible 
    applications, after evaluation against the Selection Criteria, may be 
    considered equal in technical merit. At that point, the project's cost 
    will become the deciding factor. Furthermore, an applicant's proposal 
    will not be funded when costs are determined to be unrealistically low 
    or unreasonably high.
    
    (e) Applicant Notification and Award Procedures
    
    (1) Notification
        No information will be available to applicants during the period of 
    HUD evaluation, except for notification in writing to those applicants 
    that are determined to be ineligible or that have technical 
    deficiencies in their applications that may be corrected. Selectees 
    will be announced by HUD upon completion of the evaluation process, 
    subject to final negotiations and award.
    (2) Negotiations
        After HUD has ranked the applications and made an initial 
    determination of applicants whose scores are within the funding range 
    (but before the actual award), HUD may require that applicants in this 
    group participate in negotiations to determine the specific terms of 
    the cooperative or grant agreement. In cases where it is not possible 
    to conclude the necessary negotiations successfully, awards will not be 
    made.
        If an award is not made to an applicant whose application is in the 
    initial funding threshold because of an inability to complete 
    successful negotiations, and if funds are available to fund any 
    applications that may have fallen outside the initial funding 
    threshold, HUD will select the next highest ranking applicant and 
    proceed as described in the preceding paragraph.
    (3) Funding Instrument
        HUD expects to award a cost reimbursable or fixed-price cooperative 
    or grant agreement to each successful applicant. HUD reserves the 
    right, however, to use the form of assistance agreement determined to 
    be most appropriate after negotiation with the applicant.
    (4) Reduction of Requested Grant Amounts and Special Conditions
        HUD may approve an application for an amount lower than the amount 
    requested, fund only portions of an application, withhold funds after 
    approval, and/or require the grantee to comply with special conditions 
    added to the grant agreement, in accordance with 24 CFR part 85.12, the 
    requirements of this NOFA, or where:
        (i) HUD determines the amount requested for one or more eligible 
    activities is unreasonable or unnecessary;
        (ii) The application does not otherwise meet applicable cost 
    limitations established for the program;
        (iii) The applicant has requested an ineligible activity;
        (iv) Insufficient amounts remain in that funding round to fund the 
    full amount requested in the application and HUD determines that 
    partial funding is a viable option;
        (v) The applicant has demonstrated an inability to manage HUD 
    grants, particularly Fair Housing Initiatives Program grants; or
        (vi) For any other reason where good cause exists.
    (5) Performance Sanctions
        A recipient failing to comply with the procedures set forth in its 
    grant agreement will be liable for such sanctions as may be authorized 
    by law, including repayment of improperly used funds, termination of 
    further participation in the FHIP, reduction or limitation of further 
    funding for administrative enforcement activities, and denial of 
    further participation in programs of the Department or of any Federal 
    agency.
    
    II. Application Process
    
        An application kit is required as the formal submission to apply 
    for funding. The kit includes information on the Management Work Plan 
    and Budget for activities proposed by the applicant. An application may 
    be obtained by writing the Fair Housing Information Clearinghouse, Post 
    Office Box 6091, Rockville, MD 20850, or by calling the toll free 
    number 1-800-343-3442. To ensure a prompt response, it is suggested 
    that requests for application kits be made by telephone.
        Completed applications are to be submitted to Aztec Jacobs, Funded 
    Programs Division, Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, 
    Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 5234, 451 Seventh 
    Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20410.
        The application due date will be specified in the application kit. 
    However, applicants will be given at least 45 days from today's date, 
    until September 23, 1994, to submit their applications. Applications 
    will be accepted if they are received on or before the application due 
    date, or are received within 7 days after the application due date, but 
    with a U.S. postmark or receipt from a private commercial delivery 
    service (such as, Federal Express or DHL) that is dated on or before 
    the application due date.
        The application deadline is firm as to date. In the interest of 
    fairness to all competing applicants, the Department will treat as 
    ineligible for consideration any application that is received after the 
    deadline. Applicants should take this practice into account and make 
    early submission of their materials to avoid any risk of loss of 
    eligibility brought about by unanticipated delays or other delivery-
    related problems. A transmission by facsimile machine (``FAX'') will 
    not constitute delivery.
        An applicant may apply for funding for more than one project or 
    activity. Applicants must submit all information required in the 
    application kit and must include sufficient information to establish 
    that the application meets the selection criteria set forth in section 
    I.(d), above, of this NOFA.
    
    III. Checklist of Application Submission Requirements
    
        (a) General requirements. The application kit will contain a 
    checklist of application submission requirements to complete the 
    application process. Each application for FHIP funding must contain the 
    following items:
        (1) A description of the activities proposed for funding, and the 
    practice or practices at the community, local, regional or national 
    level that have adversely affected the achievement of the goal of fair 
    housing, and that will be addressed by the proposed activities. This 
    description must include a discussion and analysis of the housing 
    practices identified, including available information and studies 
    relating to discriminatory housing practices and their historical 
    background, and relevant demographic data indicating the nature and 
    extent of the impact of the described practices on persons seeking 
    dwellings or services related to the sale, rental or financing of 
    dwellings, in the general location where the applicant proposes to 
    undertake activities;
        (2) A budget--which must include $3,000 to be used for travel costs 
    for training sponsored by the Department--and a timeline for the 
    implementation of the proposed activities, consisting of a description 
    of the specific activities to be conducted with FHIP funds, the 
    geographic areas to be served by the activities, any reports to be 
    produced in connection with the activities, the cost of each proposed 
    activity and a schedule for the implementation and completion of the 
    activities;
        (3) A description of the applicant's experience in formulating or 
    carrying out programs to prevent or eliminate discriminatory housing 
    practices or in implementing other civil rights programs, the 
    experience and qualifications of existing personnel identified for key 
    positions, or a description of the qualifications of new staff to be 
    hired, including subcontractors/consultants;
        (4) A statement indicating the need for FHIP funding in support of 
    the proposed project and an estimate of other public or private 
    resources that may be available to assist the proposed activities;
        (5) A description of the procedures to be used by the applicant for 
    monitoring the progress of the proposed activities and the applicant's 
    planned or implemented financial control procedures that will 
    demonstrate the applicant's capability in managing financial resources;
        (6) A description of the fair housing benefits that successful 
    completion of the project will produce, and the indicators by which 
    these benefits are to be measured, and;
        (7) A description of how the project will be of continuing use in 
    dealing with housing discrimination after funded activities have been 
    completed;
        (8) HUD Form 2880, Applicant Disclosures;
        (9) A listing of any current or pending grants or contracts, or 
    other business or financial relationships or agreements, to provide 
    training, education, and/or self-testing services between the applicant 
    and any entity or organization of entities involved in the sale, 
    rental, advertising or provision of brokerage or lending services for 
    housing. The listing must include the name and address of the entity or 
    organization; a brief description of the services being performed or 
    for which negotiations are pending; the dates for performance of the 
    services; and the amount of the contract or grant. This listing must be 
    updated during the grant negotiation period, at the end of the grant 
    term, and for grants that will run for more than twelve months, at the 
    end of the twelfth month.
        (10) The applicant must submit a certification and disclosure in 
    accordance with the requirements of section 319 of the Department of 
    the Interior Appropriations Act (Pub. L. 101-121, approved October 23, 
    1989), as implemented in HUD's interim final rule at 24 CFR part 87, 
    published in the Federal Register on February 26, 1990 (55 FR 6736). 
    This statute generally prohibits recipients and subrecipients of 
    Federal contracts, grants, cooperative agreements and loans from using 
    appropriated funds for lobbying the Executive or Legislative Branches 
    of the Federal Government in connection with a specific contract, 
    grant, or loan. If warranted, the applicant should include the 
    Disclosure of Lobbying Activities form (SF-LLL).
        (11) Prior to award execution, a successful applicant must submit a 
    certification that it will comply with:
        (i) Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, 
    Employment Opportunities for Lower Income Persons in Connection with 
    Assisted Projects (12 U.S.C. 1701u), and with implementing regulations 
    at 24 CFR part 135.
        (ii) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d-
    2000d-4) (Nondiscrimination in Federally Assisted Programs) and 
    implementing regulations issued at 24 CFR part 1; and
        (iii) The prohibitions against discrimination on the basis of age 
    under the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (42 U.S.C. 6101-07) and 
    implementing regulations at 24 CFR part 146, and the prohibitions 
    against discrimination against persons with disabilities under section 
    504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794) and implementing 
    regulations at 24 CFR part 8.
        (b) Additional Private Enforcement Initiative Requirements. In 
    addition to meeting the application requirements contained in section 
    III.(a), above, all proposals for testing under the Private Enforcement 
    Initiative must include:
        (1) Documentation that the applicant has at least one year of 
    experience in carrying out a program to prevent or eliminate 
    discriminatory housing practices, and has sufficient knowledge of fair 
    housing testing to enable the applicant to implement a testing program 
    successfully;
        (2) A certification providing that the applicant will not solicit 
    funds from or seek to provide fair housing educational or other 
    services or products for compensation, directly or indirectly, to any 
    person or organization which has been the subject of testing by the 
    applicant during a 12 month period following the test.
    
    IV. Corrections to Deficient Applications
    
        Applicants will not be disqualified from being considered for 
    funding because of technical deficiencies in their application 
    submission, e.g., an omission of information such as regulatory/program 
    certifications, or incomplete signatory requirements for application 
    submission.
        HUD will notify an applicant in writing of any technical 
    deficiencies in the application. The applicant must submit corrections 
    within 14 calendar days from the date of HUD's letter notifying the 
    applicant of any technical deficiency.
        The 14-day correction period pertains only to non-substantive, 
    technical deficiencies or errors. Technical deficiencies relate to 
    items that:
        1. Are not necessary for HUD review under selection criteria/
    ranking factors; and
        2. Would not improve the substantive quality of the proposal.
    
    V. Other Matters
    
    Prohibition Against Lobbying Activities
    
        The use of funds awarded under this NOFA is subject to the 
    disclosure requirements and prohibitions of Section 319 of the 
    Department of Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act for 
    Fiscal Year 1990 (31 U.S.C. 1352) (the ``Byrd Amendment'') and the 
    implementing regulations at 24 CFR part 87. These authorities prohibit 
    recipients of Federal contracts, grants, or loans from using 
    appropriated funds for lobbying the Executive or Legislative branches 
    of the Federal government in connection with a specific contract, 
    grant, or loan. The prohibition also covers the awarding of contracts, 
    grants, cooperative agreements, or loans unless the recipient has made 
    an acceptable certification regarding lobbying. Under 24 CFR part 87, 
    applicants, recipients and sub-recipients of assistance exceeding 
    $100,000 must certify that no Federal funds have been or will be spent 
    on lobbying activities in connection with the assistance.
    
    Environmental Impact
    
        A Finding of No Significant Impact with respect to the environment 
    has been made in accordance with the Department's regulations at 24 CFR 
    Part 50 which implement Section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental 
    Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332). The Finding of No Significant 
    Impact is available for public inspection between 7:30 a.m. and 5:30 
    p.m. weekdays at the Office of the Rules Docket Clerk, Room 10276, 
    Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, S.W., 
    Washington, DC 20410.
    
    Executive Order 12606, The Family
    
        The General Counsel, as the Designated Official under Executive 
    Order 12606, The Family, has determined that the policies announced in 
    this Notice would not have a significant impact on the formation, 
    maintenance, and general well-being of families except indirectly to 
    the extent of the social and other benefits expected from this program 
    of assistance.
    
    Executive Order 12612, Federalism
    
        The General Counsel has determined, as the Designated Official for 
    HUD under section 6(a) of Executive Order 12612, Federalism, that the 
    policies contained in this Notice will not have federalism implications 
    and, thus, are not subject to review under the Order. The promotion of 
    fair housing policies is a recognized goal of general benefit without 
    direct implications on the relationship between the national government 
    and the states or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
    among various levels of government.
    
    Drug-Free Workplace Certification
    
        The Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 requires grantees of Federal 
    agencies to certify that they will provide drug-free workplaces. Thus, 
    each applicant must certify that it will comply with drug-free 
    workplace requirements in accordance with 24 CFR part 24, subpart F.
    
    Accountability in the Provision of HUD Assistance
    
        HUD has promulgated a final rule to implement section 102 of the 
    Department of Housing and Urban Development Reform Act of 1989 (HUD 
    Reform Act). The final rule is codified at 24 CFR part 12. Section 102 
    contains a number of provisions that are designed to ensure greater 
    accountability and integrity in the provision of certain types of 
    assistance administered by HUD. On January 14, 1992, HUD published at 
    57 FR 1942 additional information that gave the public (including 
    applicants for, and recipients of, HUD assistance) further information 
    on the implementation of section 102. The documentation, public access, 
    and disclosure requirements of section 102 are applicable to assistance 
    awarded under this NOFA as follows:
        Documentation and public access requirements HUD will ensure that 
    documentation and other information regarding each application 
    submitted pursuant to this NOFA are sufficient to indicate the basis 
    upon which assistance was provided or denied. This material, including 
    any letters of support, will be made available for public inspection 
    for a five-year period beginning not less than 30 days after the award 
    of the assistance. Material will be made available in accordance with 
    the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and HUD's implementing 
    regulations at 24 CFR part 15. In addition, HUD will include the 
    recipients of assistance pursuant to this NOFA in its quarterly Federal 
    Register notice of all recipients of HUD assistance awarded on a 
    competitive basis. (See 24 CFR 12.14(a) and 12.16(b), and the notice 
    published in the Federal Register on January 16, 1992 (57 FR 1942), for 
    further information on these documentation and public access 
    requirements.)
        Disclosures HUD will make available to the public for five years 
    all applicant disclosure reports (HUD Form 2880) submitted in 
    connection with this NOFA. Update reports (also Form 2880) will be made 
    available along with the applicant disclosure reports, but in no case 
    for a period less than three years. All reports--both applicant 
    disclosures and updates--will be made available in accordance with the 
    Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and HUD's implementing 
    regulations at 24 CFR part 15. (See 24 CFR subpart C, and the notice 
    published in the Federal Register on January 16, 1992 (57 FR 1942), for 
    further information on these disclosure requirements.)
    
    Section 103 HUD Reform Act
    
        HUD's regulation implementing section 103 of the Department of 
    Housing and Urban Development Reform Act of 1989 was published May 13, 
    1991 (56 FR 22088) and became effective on June 12, 1991. That 
    regulation, codified as 24 CFR Part 4, applies to the funding 
    competition announced today. The requirements of the rule continue to 
    apply until the announcement of the selection of successful applicants. 
    HUD employees involved in the review of applications and in the making 
    of funding decisions are limited by Part 4 from providing advance 
    information to any person (other than an authorized employee of HUD) 
    concerning funding decisions, or from otherwise giving any applicant an 
    unfair competitive advantage. Persons who apply for assistance in this 
    competition should confine their inquiries to the subject areas 
    permitted under 24 CFR Part 4.
        Applicants who have questions should contact the HUD Office of 
    Ethics (202) 708-3815 (TDD/Voice). (This is not a toll-free number.) 
    The Office of Ethics can provide information of a general nature to HUD 
    employees, as well. However, a HUD employee who has specific program 
    questions, such as whether particular subject matter can be discussed 
    with persons outside the Department, should contact his or her Regional 
    or Field Office Counsel, or Headquarters counsel for the program to 
    which the question pertains.
    
    Section 112 HUD Reform Act
    
        Section 13 of the Department of Housing and Urban Development Act 
    contains two provisions dealing with efforts to influence HUD's 
    decisions with respect to financial assistance. The first imposes 
    disclosure requirements on those who are typically involved in these 
    efforts--those who pay others to influence the award of assistance or 
    the taking of a management action by the Department and those who are 
    paid to provide the influence. The second restricts the payment of fees 
    to those who are paid to influence the award of HUD assistance, if the 
    fees are tied to the number of housing units received or are based on 
    the amount of assistance received, or if they are contingent upon the 
    receipt of assistance.
        Section 13 was implemented by final rule published in the Federal 
    Register on May 17, 1991 (56 FR 22912) as 24 CFR part 86. If readers 
    are involved in any efforts to influence the Department in these ways, 
    they are urged to read the final rule, particularly the examples 
    contained in Appendix A of the rule.
    
        Authority: Section 561 of the Housing and Community Development 
    Act of 1987 (42 U.S.C. 3616 note); Title VIII, Civil Rights Act of 
    1968, as amended (42 U.S.C. 3601-3619); Sec. 7(d), Department of 
    Housing and Urban Development Act (42 U.S.C. 3535(d)).
    
        Dated: July 27, 1994.
    Paul Williams,
    General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal 
    Opportunity.
    [FR Doc. 94-19317 Filed 8-8-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4210-28-P