[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 152 (Tuesday, August 9, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-19364]
[[Page Unknown]]
[Federal Register: August 9, 1994]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[GC Docket No. 92-52; DA 94-836]
Reexamination of the Policy Statement on Comparative Broadcast
Hearings
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission previously adopted a second further notice of
proposed rulemaking in this proceeding, which was initiated to reform
the criteria used to select among mutually exclusive applicants for new
broadcast facilities. The Commission sought comment on the impact on
this proceeding of Bechtel v. FCC, 10 F.3d 875 (DC Cir. 1993). By order
of the General Counsel the date for filing reply comments has been
extended two weeks. The intended effect of this action is to give
members of the public additional time to reply to comments on the
Commission's proposal.
DATES: Reply comments must be filed on or before August 22, 1994.
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 1919 M Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20554.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David S. Senzel, Office of General Counsel (202) 418-1760.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Order
RM-7739; RM-7740; RM-7741
Adopted August 1, 1994; Released: August 1, 1994.
1. This order grants a Motion for Extension of Time, filed July 28,
1994, by Irene Rodriguez Diaz de McComas (McComas). McComas asks the
Commission to extend until August 22, 1994, the date for reply comments
in this proceeding.
2. On June 22, 1994, the Commission issued a second further notice
of proposed rulemaking in this proceeding, which was initiated to
reform the criteria used to select among mutually exclusive applicants
for new broadcast facilities. Reexamination of the Policy Statement on
Comparative Broadcast Hearings, 9 FCC Rcd 2821 (1994), 59 FR 32945
(Jun. 27, 1994). The Commission asked for comment on the impact on this
proceeding of the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia Circuit in Bechtel v. FCC, 10 F.3d 875 (D.C.
Cir. 1993). The second further notice established a comment date of
July 22, 1994, and a reply date of August 8, 1994. McComas requests
that the deadline for filing reply comments in this proceeding be
extended two weeks.
3. McComas asserts that technical difficulties with the
Commission's automated docket retrieval system has made it impossible
for her to obtain in a timely manner copies of the comments filed in
this proceeding. Moreover, she notes that the reply dated falls during
the period in mid-August when many parties schedule summer vacations to
coincide with the lull in Commission business that usually occurs at
that time.
4. Accordingly, It is ordered, pursuant to the authority delegated
under 47 C.F.R. 0.251(b), that good cause having been shown, the Motion
for Extension on Time, filed July 28, 1994, by Irene Rodriguez Diaz de
McComas is granted.
5. It is further ordered, That the Reply Date in this proceeding is
extended to August 22, 1994.
Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 94-19364 Filed 8-8-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
