94-19392. Detroit Edison Company; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 152 (Tuesday, August 9, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-19392]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: August 9, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [Docket No. 50-341; FERMI 2]
    
     
    
    Detroit Edison Company; Environmental Assessment and Finding of 
    No Significant Impact
    
        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is 
    considering issuance of an exemption from Facility Operating License 
    No. NPF-43, issued to Detroit Edison Company, (the licensee), for 
    operation of the Fermi 2 facility, located in Monroe County, Michigan.
    
    Environmental Assessment
    
    Identification of the Proposed Action
    
        The proposed action would grant an exemption from the requirements 
    of Appendix E, Section IV.F.3 of 10 CFR part 50 to conduct a partial 
    participation emergency preparedness exercise in 1994.
        The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's 
    application for exemption dated April 19, 1994, as supplemented by 
    letter dated June 23, 1994.
    
    The Need for the Proposed Action
    
        The licensee has stated that its response to the turbine failure 
    emergency event on December 25, 1993, demonstrated the adequacy of its 
    emergency plan and its ability to successfully respond to an accident. 
    Granting of the proposed exemption would allow the licensee to spend 
    resources which would normally be dedicated to the planning and conduct 
    of the exercise on repairing the damage to the plant and restarting the 
    facility. The licensee would still support the State and local 
    authorities during the conduct of their offsite exercise on September 
    20, 1994, and would conduct its next onsite exercise in July 1995.
    
    Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
    
        The proposed exemption would allow a one-time exemption from the 
    requirement to conduct an emergency preparedness exercise. The licensee 
    has demonstrated excellent performance in the area of emergency 
    preparedness during the last two systematic assessment of licensee's 
    performance periods. Additionally, the licensee has demonstrated an 
    ongoing commitment to maintain the high performance level of the 
    emergency preparedness program by conducting five full-scale drills, 
    and a medical drill since its last annual partial participation 
    exercise in July 1993.
        During the December 25, 1993, turbine failure accident, the 
    licensee was required to implement its emergency plan and activate a 
    portion of its emergency response organization including the technical 
    support center, operations support center and alternate operations 
    support center. Additionally, a declaration of Alert was made in 
    response to the turbine failure which caused a reactor scram, a fire 
    and severe damage to turbine auxiliary systems. The Augmented 
    Inspection Team report following the event identified some problems 
    with event classification, personnel accountability and response of the 
    fire brigade. In response to these findings, the licensee has performed 
    additional training, modified procedures and conducted an integrated 
    onsite drill on June 8, 1994.
        The licensee will support the State and local offsite exercise in 
    September 1994. State and local authorities who are involved with 
    emergency preparedness, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency, 
    have indicated their concurrence with the licensee's proposed 
    exemption. The staff has determined that the granting of this exemption 
    will not degrade the effectiveness of the licensee's emergency 
    preparedness program nor will it present an undue risk to public health 
    and safety. Therefore, post-accident radiological releases are not 
    expected to exceed previously determined values as a result of the 
    proposed action. Further, the exemption is not expected to have an 
    impact on plant radiological effluent releases.
        The change will not increase the probability or consequences of any 
    accidents, no changes are being made in the types of any effluents that 
    may be released offsite, and there is no significant increase in the 
    allowable individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. 
    Accordingly, the Commission concludes that there are no significant 
    radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
        With regard to potential nonradiological impacts, the proposed 
    action involves features located entirely within the restricted area as 
    defined in 10 CFR part 20. It does not affect nonradiological plant 
    effluents and has no other environmental impact. Accordingly, the 
    Commission concludes that there are no significant nonradiological 
    environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
    
    Alternatives to the Proposed Action
    
        Since the Commission concluded that there are no significant 
    environmental effects that would result from the proposed action, any 
    alternatives with equal or greater environmental impacts need not be 
    evaluated.
        The principal alternative would be to deny the requested exemption. 
    This would not reduce environmental impacts of plant operation and 
    would result in the use of resources to conduct the emergency 
    preparedness exercise which would be utilized for the repair and 
    restart of the damaged turbine.
    
    Alternative Use of Resources
    
        This action does not involve the use of any resources not 
    previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement for the 
    Fermi 2 plant, dated August 1981.
    
    Agencies and Persons Consulted
    
        The staff consulted with the State of Michigan official regarding 
    the environmental impact of the proposed action. The State official had 
    no comments.
    
    Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        Based upon the environmental assessment, the Commission concludes 
    that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the 
    quality of the human environment.
        Accordingly, the Commission has determined not to prepare an 
    environmental impact statement for the proposed exemption.
        For further details with respect to this proposed action, see the 
    licensee's request for exemption dated April 19, 1994, as supplemented 
    on June 23, 1994. These documents are available for public inspection 
    at the Commission's Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, N.W., 
    Washington, DC 20555, and at the local public document room located at 
    the Monroe County Library System, 3700 South Custer Road, Monroe, 
    Michigan 48161.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 29th day of July 1994.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Ledyard B. Marsh,
    Director, Project Directorate III-I, Division of Reactor Projects--III/
    IV, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 94-19392 Filed 8-8-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/09/1994
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-19392
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: August 9, 1994, Docket No. 50-341, FERMI 2