96-20335. Atomic Safety and Licensing Board; Notice of Hearing (Application to Approve Facility Decommissioning Plan)  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 155 (Friday, August 9, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 41663-41664]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-20335]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [Docket No. 50-029-DCOM ASLBP No. 96-718-01-R]
    
    
    Atomic Safety and Licensing Board; Notice of Hearing (Application 
    to Approve Facility Decommissioning Plan)
    
        Before Administrative Judges: G. Paul Bollwerk, III, Chairman, 
    Dr. Jerry R. Kline, Dr. Thomas S. Elleman
        In the Matter of Yankee Atomic Electric Company (Yankee Nuclear 
    Power Station)
    
    August 5, 1996.
        On October 27, 1995, the Commission published in the Federal 
    Register a notice indicating that it (1) was considering issuing an 
    order approving the decommissioning plan submitted by licensee Yankee 
    Atomic Electric Company (YAEC) for the Yankee Nuclear Power Station, 
    located near Rowe, Massachusetts, and (2) was offering an opportunity 
    for a hearing on
    
    [[Page 41664]]
    
    the proposed plan approval. (60 Fed. Reg. 55,069.) On November 30, 
    1995, the Citizens Awareness Network, Inc. (CAN), and the New England 
    Coalition on Nuclear Pollution (NECNP) filed a timely petition to 
    intervene. With their hearing request, the petitioners submitted five 
    contentions challenging the proposed approval of YAEC's decommissioning 
    plan based, among other things, on alleged noncompliance with (1) 
    agency standards regarding maintaining radiation doses as low as 
    reasonably achievable (ALARA), and (2) the requirements of the National 
    Environmental Policy Act of 1968 (NEPA).
        In a January 16, 1996 memorandum and order, the Commission referred 
    the petitioners' hearing request to the Atomic Safety and Licensing 
    Board Panel for the appointment of a presiding officer to conduct any 
    necessary proceedings. (See CLI-96-1, 43 NRC 1 (1996).) On January 18, 
    1996, the Chief Administrative Judge of the Panel appointed this Atomic 
    Safety and Licensing Board to act on the Commission's referral. (61 
    Fed. Reg. 1953.) The Board consists of Dr. Jerry R. Kline, Dr. Thomas 
    S. Elleman, and G. Paul Bollwerk, III, who serves as Chairman of the 
    Board.
        After receiving additional filings from the participants on the 
    issues of the petitioners' standing and the admissibility of their five 
    contentions, on February 21, 1996, the Board held a prehearing 
    conference during which the parties made further presentations 
    addressing those matters. On March 1, 1996, the Board dismissed the 
    petitioners' intervention request, ruling that although the petitioners 
    had established their standing to intervene, they had failed to present 
    a litigable contention. (See LBP-96-2, 43 NRC 61 (1996)).
        The petitioners appealed the Board's decision. In CLI-96-7, 43 NRC 
    ____ (June 18, 1996), the Commission affirmed the Board's 
    determinations regarding the petitioners' standing and the 
    admissibility of their contentions based on the information then before 
    the Board. The Commission, however, remanded to the Board a so-called 
    ``new dose argument'' that the petitioners submitted to the Commission 
    shortly after the Board's dismissal ruling. In making that referral, 
    the Commission directed the Board to determine if the ``new dose 
    argument'' met the agency's procedural standards governing ``late 
    filing'' and the admissibility of contentions so as to warrant 
    consideration in an adjudicatory hearing.
        After receiving additional party filings and conducting another 
    prehearing conference on July 16, 1996, the Board issued an additional 
    ruling on the petitioners' hearing request. In its July 31, 1996 
    decision, the Board held that (1) dismissal of the petitioners' ``new 
    dose argument'' as untimely was not warranted under a balancing of the 
    five factors governing ``late filing,'' and (2) elements of the ``new 
    dose argument'' provided a sufficient basis for the admission of a 
    contention concerning YAEC decommissioning plan compliance with ALARA 
    principles and NEPA requirements. The Board thus granted the 
    petitioners' hearing request.
        Please take notice that a hearing will be conducted in this 
    proceeding. This hearing will be governed by the formal hearing 
    procedures set forth in 10 CFR Part 2, Subpart G (10 CFR Secs. 2.700-
    .790).
        During the course of the proceeding, the Board may conduct an oral 
    argument, as provided in 10 CFR Sec. 2.755, and may hold additional 
    prehearing conferences pursuant to 10 CFR Sec. 2.752. The public is 
    invited to attend any oral argument, prehearing conference, or 
    evidentiary hearing, which may be held pursuant to 10 CFR Secs. 2.750-
    .751. In its July 31, 1996 decision, the Board established a schedule 
    that provides for holding some such sessions. (See LBP-96-15, 44 NRC at 
    ____(slip op. app. at 1-3).) Notices of those sessions will be 
    published in the Federal Register and/or made available to the public 
    at the NRC Public Document Rooms.
        In accordance with 10 CFR Sec. 2.715(a), any person not a party to 
    the proceeding may submit a written limited appearance statement 
    setting forth his or her position on the issues in this proceeding. 
    These statements do not constitute evidence, but may assist the Board 
    and/or parties in the definition of the issues being considered. 
    Persons wishing to submit a written limited appearance statement should 
    send it to the Office of the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
    Commission, Washington, DC 20555, Attention: Docketing and Service 
    Branch. A copy of the statement also should be served on the Chairman 
    of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board. The Board will decide at a 
    later date whether to entertain oral limited appearance statements.
        Documents relating to this proceeding are available for public 
    inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, the German 
    Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC 20555; and at the NRC 
    Local Public Document Room at Greenfield Community College, 1 College 
    Drive, Greenfield, Massachusetts 01301.
    
        Dated: August 5, 1996.
    
        For the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board.
    G. Paul Bollwerk III, Chairman,
    Administrative Judge.
    [FR Doc. 96-20335 Filed 8-8-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/09/1996
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-20335
Pages:
41663-41664 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 50-029-DCOM ASLBP No. 96-718-01-R
PDF File:
96-20335.pdf