[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 155 (Friday, August 9, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41638-41639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-20343]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
[Docket No. 96E-0112]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; MAXIPIME
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the
regulatory review period for MAXIPIME and is publishing this
notice of that determination as required by law. FDA has made the
determination because of the submission of an application to the
Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the
extension of a patent which claims that human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and petitions should be directed to the
Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration,
12420 Parklawn Dr., rm. 1-23, Rockville, MD 20857.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian J. Malkin, Office of Health
Affairs (HFY-20), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-443-1382.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug
and Patent Term Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100-670) generally provide
that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as
the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical
device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For human drug products, the
testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the drug becomes effective and runs until the
approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market the human drug product and
continues until FDA grants permission to market the drug product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward
the actual amount of extension that the Commissioner of Patents and
Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent
was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a regulatory review
period for a human drug product will include all of the testing phase
and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing the human drug product
MAXIPIME (cefepime hydrochloride). MAXIPIME is
indicated for the treatment of the following infections when caused by
susceptible strains of the designated microorganisms: Uncomplicated and
complicated urinary tract infections, including pyelonephritis,
uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections, and pneumonia.
Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and Trademark Office received a
patent term restoration application for MAXIPIME
[[Page 41639]]
(U.S. Patent No. 4,406,899) from Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. and the
Patent and Trademark Office requested FDA's assistance in determining
this patent's term restoration. In a letter dated May 13, 1996, FDA
advised the Patent and Trademark Office that this human drug product
had undergone a regulatory review period and that the approval of
MAXIPIME represented the first permitted commercial marketing
or use of the product. Shortly thereafter, the Patent and Trademark
Office requested that FDA determine the product's regulatory review
period.
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
MAXIPIME is 3,741 days. Of this time, 2,444 days occurred
during the testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 1,297
days occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were
derived from the following dates:
-1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective: October 23,
1985. The applicant claims November 22, 1985, as the date the
investigational new drug application (IND) became effective. However,
FDA records indicate that the IND's effective date was October 23,
1985, which was 30 days after FDA receipt of the IND.
-2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect
to the human drug product under section 507 of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act: July 1, 1992. The applicant claims June 30, 1992, as
the date the new drug application (NDA) for MAXIPIME (NDA 50-
679) was initially submitted. However, FDA records indicate that NDA
50-679 was submitted on July 1, 1992.
-3. The date the human drug was approved: January 18, 1996. FDA has
verified the applicant's claim that NDA 50-679 was approved on January
18, 1996.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in
its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its
application for patent extension, the applicant seeks 1,825 days of
patent term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published is
incorrect may, on or before October 8, 1996, submit to the Dockets
Management Branch (address above) written comments and ask for a
redetermination. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA,
on or before February 6, 1997, for a determination regarding whether
the applicant for extension acted with due diligence during the
regulatory review period. To meet its burden, the petition must contain
sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part
1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the
format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Dockets
Management Branch (address above) in three copies (except that
individuals may submit single copies) and identified with the docket
number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Comments and
petitions may be seen in the Dockets Management Branch between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: July 26, 1996.
Stuart L. Nightingale,
Associate Commisioner for Health Affairs.
[FR Doc. 96-20343 Filed 8-8-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
