96-20381. Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 155 (Friday, August 9, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 41608]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-20381]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    [ER-FRL-5472-2]
    
    
    Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of 
    EPA Comments
    
        Availability of EPA comments prepared July 22, 1996 Through July 
    26, 1996 pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), under 
    Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(c) of the National 
    Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA 
    comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at (202) 
    564-7167. An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental 
    impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 05, 1996 (61 
    FR 15251).
    
    Draft EISs
    
        ERP No. D-COE-G85180-LA Rating EO2, Estelle Plantation Partnership 
    Municipal Golf Course and Housing Development, Implementation, 
    Jefferson Parish, LA.
        Summary: EPA expressed environmental objections to the proposal and 
    requested additional information in the final EIS. Additional 
    information needed in the FEIS include: (1) the need for expanded 
    alternative analysis, (2) development of purpose and need to support 
    practicable alternative, (3) minimization of direct and secondary 
    impacts, (4) lack of a mitigation plan to offset unavoidable impacts, 
    (5) water quality management, and (6) lack of consideration of 
    Executive Order 11990 (Wetlands Protection) and Executive Order 11988 
    (Floodplain Management).
        ERP No. D-NOA-C90016-NJ Rating EC2, Mullica River--Great Bay 
    National Estuarine Research Reserve Establishment, Site Designation and 
    Plan Implementation, Ocean, Atlantic and Burlington Counties, NJ.
        Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about the impacts 
    that may be caused by construction and operation of the proposed 
    facilities. Additional information to address this issue is requested 
    in the final EIS.
        ERP No. D-USA-C11012-NJ Rating EC2, Evans Subpost Disposal and 
    Reuse, Implementation, Fort Monmouth, Ocean and Monmouth Counties, NJ.
        Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about the project's 
    potential impacts to ground water and has requested additional 
    information to address this issue in the final EIS.
        ERP No. D-USN-E11037-FL Rating EC2, Programmatic EIS--Mayport Naval 
    Station, To Evaluate Facilities Development Necessary to Support 
    Potential Aircraft Carrier Homporting, Duval County, FL.
        Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about ODMDS capacity 
    and mounding effects, and impacts to the ozone maintenance area. EPA 
    requested that these issue be addressed in the final document.
    
    Final EISs
    
        ERP No. F-AFS-E65046-SC, Francis Marion National Forest Land and 
    Resource Management Plan, Implementation, Charleston and Berkeley 
    Counties, SC.
    Summary:
        EPA's review found that the document adequately addressed impacts 
    associated with the selected forest plan. No major objections to the 
    selected plan were found.
        ERP No. F-FRC-C02000-PR, Eco Ele'ctrica Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) 
    Import Terminal and Electric Cogeneration Project Construction and 
    Operation, Permits and Approvals, Guayanilla Bay, PR.
        Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns involving site 
    contamination. Accordingly, EPA requested that this issue be addressed 
    in the project's authorization order.
        ERP No. F-TVA-E32075-TN, Upper Tennessee River Navigation 
    Improvement Project, Rehabilitation and/or Construction, Chickamauga 
    Dam--Navigation Lock Structural Improvement Alternative, Funding, NPDES 
    Permit, Coast Guard Bridge Permit and COE Section 404 Permits, 
    Tennessee River, Hamilton County, TN.
        Summary: EPA continued to express environmental concerns about the 
    proposed project's potential for industrial development, comparison of 
    water quality information to standards, NEPA discussion of proposed 
    bridges, cumulative impact speculations, and noise level documentation.
    
        Dated: August 5, 1996.
    William D. Dickerson,
    Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
    [FR Doc. 96-20381 Filed 8-08-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/09/1996
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-20381
Pages:
41608-41608 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
ER-FRL-5472-2
PDF File:
96-20381.pdf