94-21385. Institute for Czech Secondary School Administrators  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 169 (Thursday, September 1, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-21385]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: September 1, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY
    
     
    
    Institute for Czech Secondary School Administrators
    
    ACTION: Notice--Request for Proposals.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Office of Academic Programs of the United States 
    Information Agency's Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs 
    announces an open competition for an assistance award program. Public 
    or private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions described in 
    IRS regulation 501(c)(3) may apply to conduct a four-week institute in 
    February 1995 for eight secondary school administrators from the Czech 
    Republic on school administration in a pluralistic, democratic society. 
    The purpose of the institute is to expose participants to secondary 
    school governance in the U.S. (public and private); in particular, the 
    way democratic practices affect school administration, school 
    philosophy, school activities, and school/community relationships. The 
    institute should demonstrate how democratic practices in schools can 
    support curricular reform, particularly in social studies and civic 
    education. Participants will be nominated by the United States 
    Information Service (USIS) post in the Czech Republic, will be fluent 
    in English, and will be involved in implementing reform in secondary 
    school education, including civic education, in the Czech Republic. 
    USIA solicits detailed proposals from U.S. educational institutions and 
    public and private non-profit organizations. Proposals demonstrating 
    both expertise in training secondary school administrators and an 
    understanding of the issues facing Czech educators will be more 
    competitive.
        The funding authority for the program cited above is provided 
    through the Support for Eastern European Democracies Act (SEED).
        Programs and projects must conform with Agency requirements and 
    guidelines outlined in the Application Package. USIA projects and 
    programs are subject to the availability of funds.
    
    ANNOUNCEMENT NAME AND NUMBER: All communications with USIA concerning 
    this announcement should refer to the above title and reference number 
    E/AS-94-01.
    
    DATES: Deadline for proposals: All copies must be received at the U.S. 
    Information Agency by 5 p.m. Washington, D.C. time on Friday, October 
    14, 1994. Faxed documents will not be accepted, nor will documents 
    postmarked on October 14, but received at a later date. It is the 
    responsibility of each applicant to ensure that proposals are received 
    by the above deadline.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Office of Academic Programs, Advising, Teaching and Specialized 
    Programs Division, E/AS (Room 252), U.S. Information Agency, 301 4th 
    Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, telephone number: 202/619-4557, fax 
    number: 202/619-6970, e-mail: skux@usia.gov, to request an Application 
    Package, which includes more detailed award criteria; all application 
    forms; and guidelines for preparing proposals, including specific 
    criteria for preparation of the proposal budget. Please specify the 
    USIA Program Specialist Sally Kux on all inquiries and correspondences. 
    Interested applicants should read the complete Federal Register 
    announcement before addressing inquiries to the Office of Academic 
    Programs or submitting their proposals. Once the RFP deadline has 
    passed, the Office of Academic Programs may not discuss this 
    competition in any way with applicants until after the Bureau proposal 
    review process has been completed.
    
    ADDRESSES: Applicants must follow all instructions given in the 
    Application Package and send only complete applications to: U.S. 
    Information Agency, Ref.: E/AS-94-01, Office of Grants Management, E/
    XE, Room 336, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the Bureau's authorizing 
    legislation, programs must maintain a non-political character and 
    should be balanced and representative of the diversity of American 
    political, social, and cultural life. ``Diversity'' should be 
    interpreted in the broadest sense and encompass differences including 
    but not limited to race, gender, religion, geographic location, socio-
    economic status, and physical challenges. Applicants are strongly 
    encouraged to adhere to the advancement of this principle.
    
    Overview
    
        The goal of the Institute for Czech Secondary School Administrators 
    is to assist Czech secondary school administrators to develop 
    strategies for restructuring secondary schools in the Czech Republic. 
    If the substantive reform of secondary school curricula is to take 
    hold, it must be accompanied by reforms in the structure of school 
    administration. Although the Czech educational system has been and will 
    remain very different from the U.S. system, exposure to a variety of 
    administrative methods utilized in U.S. schools will enable Czech 
    administrators to consider ways to respond to their increasing 
    autonomy. The Institute should address such topics as: Strategies for 
    school administrators to use in their relations with government 
    officials, particularly with regard to proposals for reform; the 
    involvement of faculty in administrative decision-making; ways to 
    motivate faculty to develop and teach new curricula; and the 
    participation of students and parents in school-related issues. These 
    are among the new concerns of educators in the Czech Republic, who have 
    a growing opportunity to influence educational policy and school 
    management. As a result of this program, participants will be better 
    equipped to initiate reforms in their own schools and to advocate 
    reform effectively with administrators and colleagues both at the Czech 
    Ministry of Education and at schools throughout the Czech Republic.
    
    Participants
    
        The program should be designed for a group of eight secondary 
    school administrators. The participants will all be involved in 
    education reform and will be fluent in English. They will be chosen by 
    USIA and the USIS post in Prague, in consultation with the Institute 
    for Educational Development at Charles University, Prague, according to 
    such criteria as the candidate's potential to implement reforms in 
    administrative practice and the candidate's ability to influence other 
    secondary school administrators in the Czech Republic.
    
    Program Description
    
        The program should consist primarily of seminars and workshops on 
    topics in secondary school administration that have relevance to Czech 
    educators. Topics might include: Decision-making, conflict resolution, 
    negotiation and compromise, the budgeting of time and money, curricular 
    development, school-government relations (at both the local and 
    national levels), faculty-administration relations, student- and 
    parent-administration relations, parent-teacher relations, and such co-
    curricular activities as student government, school newspapers, etc. 
    The program should emphasize the practical application of skills and 
    techniques by balancing the presentations of seminar leaders with 
    sessions in which participants explore ways to adapt these skills and 
    techniques to their institutional contexts at home. A general 
    introduction to the U.S. educational system would provide useful 
    background to the seminars and workshops on specific topics.
        While selected observations and meetings would be critical to this 
    institute, they should be limited in number and should be organized to 
    complement and reinforce the academic program and its emphasis on 
    practical knowledge. Relevant visits might be made to local schools, 
    schools in another locale (to demonstrate the diversity of approaches 
    within the American system), school board meetings, faculty meetings, 
    parent-teacher conferences, student government sessions, etc. 
    Consultations with appropriate professional organizations may also be 
    integrated into the program and money should be allocated for relevant 
    subscriptions and memberships.
        The program should incorporate a Washington component, perhaps as 
    the final portion, to include substantive meetings with national 
    professional and educational associations, as well as cultural 
    activities.
        Proposals should elaborate a detailed daily schedule for the entire 
    program.
    
    Orientation/Debriefing
    
        To prepare participants for this project, the office strongly 
    encourages the recipient to develop and/or procure material to be sent 
    via USIS Prague for distribution to participants prior to their 
    departure for the U.S. This material might include a project schedule 
    and outline with suggested goals and objectives, relevant background 
    information, details about U.S. institutions and individuals involved 
    in the program, as well as introductory readings. Upon arrival, it is 
    strongly recommended that participants attend an orientation session 
    which would address administrative details, in addition to providing 
    general information about U.S. society and culture to facilitate 
    participants' understanding of and adjustment to daily life in the U.S.
        The schedule should include time for summation and evaluation by 
    participants at the program's conclusion. In addition to written 
    reports, it would be useful to organize an activity such as a round-
    table, where participants could review the program and discuss plans to 
    use the ideas and materials resulting from this institute.
    
    Program Administration
    
        All programming, administrative logistics, travel (international 
    and domestic), management of the academic program, as well as any 
    cultural component, will be the responsibility of the project director. 
    A project assistant should be assigned to carry out administrative and 
    clerical duties necessary for the program, from the planning stages to 
    the completion of a final report to USIA. Staff escorts traveling under 
    USIA cooperative agreement support must be U.S. citizens with 
    demonstrated qualifications for this service.
        The proposal must clearly demonstrate the capability of program 
    staff to manage the residential and travel components of the program. 
    Proposals incorporating participant site visits will be more 
    competitive if letters committing prospective host institutions to 
    support these efforts are provided.
        USIA will be responsible for all communications with USIS Prague 
    regarding participant selection.
    
    Visa/Insurance/Tax Requirements
    
        Programs must comply with J-1 visa regulations; program 
    participants must carry the requisite level of health and accident 
    insurance. The recipient organization should budget for insurance 
    expenses and is responsible for ensuring that participants have 
    adequate insurance coverage. Please refer to program-specific 
    guidelines in the Application Package for further details. 
    Administration of the program must be in compliance with reporting and 
    withholding regulations for federal, state, and local taxes as 
    applicable. Recipient organizations should demonstrate tax regulation 
    adherence in the proposal narrative and budget.
    
    Proposed Budget
    
        Applicants must submit a comprehensive line item budget for which 
    specific details and guidelines are available in the Application 
    Package. Total program and administrative costs funded by USIA may not 
    exceed $85,000 for eight participants; within the assistance award, 
    total institutional administrative costs funded by USIA may not exceed 
    $17,000.
    
    Review Process
    
        USIA will acknowledge receipt of all proposals and will review them 
    for technical eligibility. Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they 
    do not fully adhere to the guidelines stated herein and in the 
    Application Package. Eligible proposals will be forwarded to panels of 
    USIA officers for advisory review. All eligible proposals will also be 
    reviewed by the budget and contracts offices, as well as the USIS 
    Office of East European and NIS Affairs and USIS Prague. Proposals may 
    also be reviewed by the Office of the General Counsel or by other 
    Agency elements. Funding decisions are at the discretion of the USIA 
    Associate Director for Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final 
    technical authority for grant awards resides with the USIA grants 
    officer.
    
    Review Criteria
    
        Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed 
    according to the following criteria:
        1. Overall quality:
        a. The content, significance, definition, organization and academic 
    rigor of the proposed program and its appropriateness to program 
    objectives and guidelines;
        b. Evidence of careful planning in all substantive and logistical 
    aspects of the program;
        c. Demonstrated knowledge of the Czech cultural, educational, and 
    political context.
        2. Ability to achieve program objectives: Objectives should be 
    reasonable, feasible, and flexible. Proposals should clearly 
    demonstrate how the institution will meet the program's objectives and 
    plan.
        3. Institutional Capacity: Proposed personnel and institutional 
    resources should be adequate and appropriate to achieve the program or 
    project's goals.
        4. Institution's Record/Ability: Proposals should demonstrate the 
    experience of the institution and designated staff with foreign 
    educators and international exchange programs, including responsible 
    fiscal management and full compliance with all reporting requirements 
    for past Agency grants as determined by USIA's Office of Contracts. The 
    Agency will consider the past performance of prior recipients and the 
    demonstrated potential of new applicants.
        5. Multiplier effect/impact: Proposal should demonstrate the 
    program's efforts to expose participants to pertinent subject matter 
    and innovative tools which may be applied to administrative problems 
    and to encourage participants to share the experience and insights 
    gained on this program with other Czech colleagues.
        6. Project Evaluation: Proposals should include a plan for an 
    evaluation at the conclusion of the institute and will be more 
    competitive if they also incorporate an evaluative component in weekly 
    program activities to enable timely response to participants' 
    suggestions. Recipient will submit a final report to USIA.
        7. Follow-on Activities: Proposals should provide for follow-on 
    activity (without USIA support), such as continued contact with 
    participants and facilitation of participants' access to U.S. scholarly 
    organizations, publications, and other appropriate resources to 
    encourage the sharing of information and the development of long-term 
    institutional and invidual relations.
        8. Support of Diversity: Proposals should demonstrate the 
    recipient's commitment to promoting the awareness and understanding of 
    diversity throughout the program. This can be accomplished throughout 
    documentation (such as a written statement of account) summarizing past 
    and/or on-going activities and efforts that further the principle of 
    diversity within both the organization and the program activities.
        9. Cost-effectiveness: The overhead and administrative components 
    of the proposal, including salaries and honoraria, should be kept as 
    low as possible. All other items should be necessary and appropriate.
        10. Cost-sharing: Proposals should maximize cost-sharing through 
    other private sector support as well as institutional direct funding 
    contributions.
        11. Value to U.S.-Partner Country Relations: Proposed projects 
    should receive positive assessments by USIA's geographic area desk and 
    overseas officers of program need, potential impact, and significance 
    in the partner country.
    
    Notice
    
        The terms and conditions published in this RFP are binding and may 
    not be modified by any USIA representative. Explanatory information 
    provided by the Agency that contradicts published language will not be 
    binding. Issuance of the RFP does not constitute an award commitment on 
    the part of the Government. The needs of the program may require the 
    award to be reduced, revised, or increased. Final awards cannot be made 
    until funds have been appropriated by Congress, allocated and committed 
    through internal USIA procedures.
    
    Notification
    
        All applicants will be notified of the results of the review 
    process on or about November 28, 1994. Awards made will be subject to 
    periodic reporting and evaluation requirements.
    
        Dated: August 24, 1994.
    Dell Pendergrast,
    Deputy Associate Director, Educational and Cultural Affairs.
    [FR Doc. 94-21385 Filed 8-31-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
09/01/1994
Department:
United States Information Agency
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice--Request for Proposals.
Document Number:
94-21385
Dates:
Deadline for proposals: All copies must be received at the U.S. Information Agency by 5 p.m. Washington, D.C. time on Friday, October 14, 1994. Faxed documents will not be accepted, nor will documents postmarked on October 14, but received at a later date. It is the responsibility of each applicant to ensure that proposals are received by the above deadline.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: September 1, 1994