94-21673. Nectarines and Fresh Peaches Grown in California; Expenses and Assessment Rates for the 1994-95 Fiscal Year  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 169 (Thursday, September 1, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-21673]
    
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 59, No. 169 / Thursday, September 1, 1994 /
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: September 1, 1994]
    
    
                                                       VOL. 59, NO. 169
    
                                            Thursday, September 1, 1994
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Agricultural Marketing Service
    
    7 CFR Parts 916 and 917
    
    [Docket No. FV94-916-3FIR]
    
     
    
    Nectarines and Fresh Peaches Grown in California; Expenses and 
    Assessment Rates for the 1994-95 Fiscal Year
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture (Department) is adopting as a 
    final rule, without changes, the provisions of the interim final rule 
    which authorized expenses and established assessment rates for the 
    Nectarine Administrative Committee and the Peach Commodity Committee 
    (Committees) under Marketing Order (M.O.) Nos. 916 and 917 for the 
    1994-95 fiscal year. Authorization of these budgets enable the 
    Committees to incur expenses that are reasonable and necessary to 
    administer their programs. Funds to administer these programs are 
    derived from assessments on handlers.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATES: March 1, 1994, through February 28, 1995.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Britthany Beadle, Marketing Order 
    Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, P.O. 
    Box 96456, Room 2523-S, Washington, D.C. 20090-6456, telephone: (202) 
    720-5127; or Terry Vawter, California Marketing Field Office, Fruit and 
    Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, 2202 Monterey Street, Suite 102 B, 
    Fresno, California 93721, telephone: (209) 487-5901.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule is issued under Marketing 
    Agreement and Order No. 916 [7 CFR Part 916] regulating the handling of 
    nectarines grown in California and Marketing Agreement and Order No. 
    917 [7 CFR Part 917] regulating the handling of fresh peaches grown in 
    California. The agreements and orders are effective under the 
    Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended [7 U.S.C. 601-
    674], hereinafter referred to as the Act.
        The Department of Agriculture (Department) is issuing this rule in 
    conformance with Executive Order 12866.
        This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12778, 
    Civil Justice Reform. Under the marketing order provisions now in 
    effect, nectarines and peaches grown in California are subject to 
    assessments. It is intended that the assessment rates specified herein 
    will be applicable to all assessable nectarines and peaches handled 
    during the 1994-95 fiscal year, which began March 1, 1994, through 
    February 28, 1995. This final rule will not preempt any state or local 
    laws, regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable 
    conflict with this rule.
        The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
    before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
    Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the Secretary a 
    petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any 
    obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance 
    with law and requesting a modification of the order or to be exempted 
    therefrom. Such handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on 
    the petition. After the hearing the Secretary would rule on the 
    petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States 
    in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or 
    her principal place of business, has jurisdiction in equity to review 
    the Secretary's ruling on the petition, provided a bill in equity is 
    filed not later than 20 days after date of the entry of the ruling.
        Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act (RFA), the Administrator of the Agricultural Marketing 
    Service (AMS) has considered the economic impact of this rule on small 
    entities.
        The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
    business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
    not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
    pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that 
    they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
    entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small 
    entity orientation and compatibility.
        There are approximately 300 handlers of nectarines and peaches 
    regulated under the marketing orders each season and approximately 
    1,800 producers of these fruits in California. Small agricultural 
    producers have been defined by the Small Business Administration [13 
    CFR 121.601] as those having annual receipts of less than $500,000, and 
    small agricultural service firms are defined as those whose annual 
    receipts are less than $5,000,000. The majority of these handlers and 
    producers may be classified as small entities.
        The nectarine and peach marketing orders, administered by the 
    Department, require that the assessment rates for a particular fiscal 
    year apply to all assessable nectarines and peaches handled from the 
    beginning of such year. Annual budgets of expenses are prepared by the 
    Committees, the agencies responsible for local administration of their 
    respective marketing order, and submitted to the Department for 
    approval. The members of the Committees are nectarine and peach 
    handlers and producers. They are familiar with the Committees' needs 
    and with the costs for goods, services, and personnel in their local 
    area, and are thus in a position to formulate appropriate budgets. The 
    Committees' budgets are formulated and discussed in public meetings. 
    Thus, all directly affected persons have an opportunity to participate 
    and provide input.
        The assessment rates recommended by the Committees are derived by 
    dividing the anticipated expenses by expected shipments of nectarines 
    and peaches. Because these rates are applied to actual shipments, they 
    must be established at rates which will provide sufficient income to 
    pay the Committees' expected expenses.
        The Nectarine Administrative Committee met on May 4, 1994, and 
    unanimously recommended total expenses of $3,844,635 for the 1994-95 
    fiscal year. In comparison, the 1993-94 fiscal year expenses amount was 
    $3,804,962, representing a $39,673 increase in expenses from the 1993-
    94 fiscal year.
        The Committee also unanimously recommended an assessment rate of 
    $0.1825 per 25-pound container or equivalent for the 1994-95 fiscal 
    year, which is the same assessment rate that was approved for the 1993-
    94 fiscal year. The assessment rate, when applied to anticipated 
    shipments of 18,144,000 25-pound containers or equivalent of nectarines 
    would yield $3,311,280 in assessment income. Adequate funds exist in 
    the Committee's reserve to cover additional expenses.
        Major expense categories for the 1994-95 nectarine budget include 
    $447,118 for salaries and benefits, $1,402,000 for domestic market 
    development, and $1,000,000 for inspection. Funds in the reserve at the 
    end of the 1994-95 fiscal year, estimated at $363,483, will be within 
    the maximum permitted by the order of one fiscal year's expenses.
        The Peach Commodity Committee also met May 4, 1994, and unanimously 
    recommended total expenses of $3,967,335, for the 1994-95 fiscal year. 
    In comparison, this is $113,790 more than the $3,853,545 expense amount 
    that was recommended for the 1993-94 fiscal year.
        The Committee also unanimously recommended an assessment rate of 
    $0.19 per 25-pound container or equivalent for the 1994-95 fiscal year, 
    which is the same assessment rate that was approved for the previous 
    fiscal year. The assessment rate, when applied to anticipated shipments 
    of 17,571,000 25-pound containers or equivalent of peaches, would yield 
    $3,338,490 in assessment income. Adequate funds exist in the 
    Committee's reserve fund to cover additional expenses.
        Major expense categories for the 1994-95 fiscal period are $447,118 
    in salaries and benefits, $1,402,000 for domestic market development, 
    and $950,000 for inspection. Funds in the reserve at the end of the 
    1994-95 fiscal year, estimated at $578,639, will be within the maximum 
    permitted by the order of one fiscal year's expenses.
        An interim final rule was published in the Federal Register [59 FR 
    33897, July 1, 1994] and provided a 30-day comment period for 
    interested persons. No comments were received.
        While this action will impose some additional costs on handlers, 
    the costs are in the form of uniform assessments on all handlers. Some 
    of the additional costs may be passed on to producers. However, these 
    costs should be significantly offset by the benefits derived from the 
    operation of the marketing orders. Therefore, the Administrator of the 
    AMS has determined that this action will not have a significant 
    economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
        It is found that the specified expenses for the marketing order 
    covered in this rule are reasonable and likely to be incurred and that 
    such expenses and the specified assessment rate to cover such expenses 
    will tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
        It is further found that good cause exists for not postponing the 
    effective date of this action until 30 days after publication in the 
    Federal Register [5 U.S.C. 553] because the Committee needs to have 
    sufficient funds to pay its expenses which are incurred on a continuous 
    basis. The 1994-95 fiscal year for the program began March 1, 1994. The 
    marketing order requires that the rate of assessment apply to all 
    assessable nectarines and fresh peaches handled during the fiscal year. 
    In addition, handlers are aware of this action which was recommended by 
    the Committee at a public meeting and published in the Federal Register 
    as an interim final rule. No comments were received concerning the 
    interim final rule that is adopted in this action as a final rule 
    without change.
    
    List of Subjects
    
    7 CFR Part 916
    
        Marketing agreements, Nectarines, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
    7 CFR Part 917
    
        Marketing agreements, Pears, Peaches, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
        For the reason set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR Parts 916 and 917 
    are amended as follows:
    
    PART 916--NECTARINES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
    
        Accordingly, the interim final rule amending 7 CFR Part 916 which 
    was published at 59 FR 33897 on July 1, 1994, is adopted as a final 
    rule without change.
    
    PART 917--FRESH PEARS AND PEACHES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
    
        Accordingly, the interim final rule amending 7 CFR Part 917 which 
    was published at 59 FR 33897 on July 1, 1994, is adopted as a final 
    rule without change.
    
        Dated: August 25, 1994.
    Martha B. Ransom,
    Acting Deputy Director, Fruit and Vegetable Division.
    [FR Doc. 94-21673 Filed 8-31-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
09/01/1994
Department:
Agricultural Marketing Service
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
94-21673
Dates:
March 1, 1994, through February 28, 1995.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: September 1, 1994, Docket No. FV94-916-3FIR
CFR: (2)
7 CFR 916
7 CFR 917