98-24276. Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 176 (Friday, September 11, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Page 48634]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-24276]
    
    
    
    [[Page 48634]]
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
    
    47 CFR Parts 54 and 69
    
    [CC Docket No. 96-45; DA 98-1581]
    
    
    Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service
    
    AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: In this document, the Commission clarifies the application of 
    the Commission's ``lowest corresponding price'' requirement set forth 
    in the Universal Service Order, 62 FR 32862 (June 17, 1997). The 
    Commission clarifies that this requirement was not intended to preempt 
    state law, and does not obligate carriers to offer rates that would 
    violate state laws.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: September 11, 1998.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kaylene Shannon, Attorney, Common 
    Carrier Bureau, Accounting Policy Division, (202) 418-7400.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's 
    document released on August 7, 1998. The full text of this document is 
    available for public inspection during regular business hours in the 
    FCC Reference Center, Room 239, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., 
    20554. This document is also available from the Commission's copy 
    contractor, International Transcription Service, 1231 20th Street, 
    N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036.
    
    I. Background
    
        1. In the Universal Service Order, 62 FR 32862 (June 17, 1997), the 
    Commission provided that schools and libraries should be eligible to 
    apply for discounted telecommunications services, Internet access, and 
    internal connections, subject to certain limitations and conditions. 
    The Universal Service Order concluded that, to ensure that their lack 
    of experience in dealing with telecommunications providers does not 
    prevent schools and libraries from receiving competitive prices, 
    service providers must offer services to eligible schools and libraries 
    at prices no higher than the lowest price the provider charges to 
    similarly situated non-residential customers for similar services. The 
    Commission clarified that, for purposes of determining the lowest 
    corresponding price, similar services would include those provided 
    under contract as well as those provided under tariff. The Commission 
    established a rebuttable presumption that rates offered within the 
    previous three years are compensatory.
        2. In the Fourth Reconsideration, 63 FR 2093 (January 13, 1998), 
    the Commission concluded that earlier versions of tariffs that have 
    been modified should be included in the comparable rates upon which the 
    lowest corresponding rate is determined, ``[u]nless a regulatory agency 
    has found that the tariffed rate should be changed, and affirmatively 
    ordered such change, or absent a showing that the rate is not 
    compensatory.'' A question has been raised whether the lowest 
    corresponding rate can be based on rates not lawfully offered under 
    state law.
    
    II. Discussion
    
        3. Although the Commission disagreed with the general assertion 
    that the lowest corresponding price should not reflect expired tariffs, 
    the Commission did not expressly preempt state laws governing what 
    rates may lawfully be offered to eligible schools and libraries. In the 
    absence of such an expressly stated intention to preempt, we conclude 
    that the Commission did not intend to require carriers to base the 
    lowest corresponding rate on rates that may not lawfully be offered 
    under state law. Thus, we interpret the Fourth Reconsideration as 
    requiring only that rates that may be offered consistent with state law 
    must be made available as the lowest corresponding price.
    
    III. Ordering Clause
    
        4. Accordingly, it is ordered that, pursuant to section 4(i) and 
    section 254 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 
    154(i) and 254, and sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 
    47 CFR 0.91 and 0.291, the lowest corresponding price requirement is 
    clarified.
    
    List of Subjects
    
    47 CFR Part 54
    
        Healthcare providers, Libraries, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements, Schools, Telecommunications, Telephone.
    
    47 CFR Part 69
    
        Communications common carriers, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements, Telephone.
    
    Federal Communication Commission.
    Kathryn C. Brown,
    Chief, Common Carrier Bureau.
    [FR Doc. 98-24276 Filed 9-10-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
9/11/1998
Published:
09/11/1998
Department:
Federal Communications Commission
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
98-24276
Dates:
September 11, 1998.
Pages:
48634-48634 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
CC Docket No. 96-45, DA 98-1581
PDF File:
98-24276.pdf
CFR: (2)
47 CFR 54
47 CFR 69