[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 13, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-22574]
[[Page Unknown]]
[Federal Register: September 13, 1994]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP94-751-000, et al.]
Transwestern Pipeline Co., et al., Natural Gas Certificate
Filings
September 6, 1994.
Take notice that the following filings have been made with the
Commission:
1. Transwestern Pipeline Company
[Docket No. CP94-751-000]
Take notice that on August 30, 1994, Transwestern Pipeline Company
(Transwestern), Post Office Box 1188, Houston, Texas 77251-1188 filed
an application pursuant to Section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act for an
order granting permission and approval to abandon certain facilities,
all as more fully set forth in the application which is on file with
the Commission and open to public inspection.
Transwestern states that while preparing for further proceedings in
its refunctionalization proceeding in Docket No. CP94-254-000, and upon
further analysis of its system in response to the gathering orders
recently issued by the Commission, it was discovered that certain field
facilities, including certain compressors, plants, meters, dehydrators,
and other miscellaneous wellhead facilities are no longer used and
useful or are uneconomical or otherwise unnecessary for continued
operation of the pipeline. It is stated that this abandonment requests
authorization to abandon certain compression, plants, metering,
dehydration, and other miscellaneous facilities, and to secure all
other authorizations as may be required under the circumstances.
Transwestern states that it is proposing to abandon a number of
compressors because the wells upstream have been plugged and abandoned
by the producer and deliveries of gas have ceased. It is stated that
other compression facilities will be abandoned because the wellhead
pressure has fallen below the level necessary for the gas to enter
Transwestern's facilities or gas can no longer enter Transwestern's
system because the producer disconnected the well. In certain
instances, Transwestern contends that the well has been split connected
or disconnected because the producer has opted to transport the gas
through another pipeline with a lower pressure line. Transwestern
submits that abandonment of other compressors is requested because the
volumes of gas from the wells behind the compressors have fallen to
below the minimum level required for operation of the compressors.
According to Transwestern, abandonment of some of the compressors
is requested because the facilities are no longer needed for one of the
following reasons: (i) The gathering system behind the compressor was
sold and there are no volumes flowing into the Transwestern system;
(ii) the producer decided to provide its own compression; (iii) an
exchange arrangement with another pipeline was terminated, and
compression is no longer required or necessary; (iv) Transwestern's
line pressure was lowered to the point that compression is no longer
required; or (v) at stations where there are multiple units, the volume
decreased to the point that one or more such units are not required.
Transwestern also proposes to abandon six plants, three because the
producers have chosen to install their own treating facilities for the
removal of hydrogen sulfide, and therefore, the plants are no longer
necessary.
For the remaining three plants, Transwestern states that one will
be abandoned because the wells requiring hydrogen sulfide removal have
been plugged and abandoned, one will be abandoned because the
production behind the plant no longer consists of sour gas requiring
hydrogen sulfide removal, and the third will be abandoned its operation
is no longer economically feasible due to a substantial decrease of
volumes flowing through the plant.
Transwestern states that it also proposes to abandon meters,
dehydrators, and associated facilities because no gas has flowed
through the subject facilities since 1990, and it is quite certain that
no gas will flow through the facilities in the future.
Comment date: September 27, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph F at the end of this notice.
2. ANR Pipeline Company and Northern Natural Gas Company
[Docket No. CP94-752-000]
Take notice that on August 30, 1994, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR),
500 Renaissance Center, Detroit, Michigan 48243, and Northern Natural
Gas Company (Northern), 1111 South 103rd Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68124-
1000, filed jointly in Docket No. CP94-752-000 an application pursuant
to Section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act for permission and approval to
abandon the transportation and storage services authorized in Docket
Nos. CP75-182 and CP75-237,1 all as more fully set forth in the
application on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\See Opinion No. 810 and order issued July 7, 1977 (59 FPC 533
(1977).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANR and Northern propose to abandon the natural gas transportation
and storage services performed under an agreement dated November 26,
1974, on file as ANR's Rate Schedule X-59. It is stated that under the
agreement Northern delivers, during the period of March through
October, up to an aggregate quantity of 4,200,000 Mcf at a peak daily
rate of 22,050 Mcf. It is further stated that, during the period of
November through February, ANR redelivers the aggregate quantity at no
more than 42,000 Mcf per day. It is stated that the primary term of the
agreement ends February 28, 1995, and the parties have agreed to
terminate the arrangement effective as of that date in accordance with
the terms of the agreement.
Comment date: September 27, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph F at the end of this notice.
3. Northern Natural Gas Company
[Docket No. CP94-756-000]
Take notice that on August 31, 1994, Northern Natural Gas Company
(Northern), 1111 South 103rd Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68124-1000, filed
in Docket No. CP94-756-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and
157.212 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18
CFR 157.205, 157.212) for authorization to upgrade an existing delivery
point under Northern's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-
401-000 pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully
set forth in the request that is on file with the Commission and open
to public inspection.
Northern proposes to upgrade the delivery point in order to
accommodate increased natural gas deliveries to Northern States Power--
Minnesota, for delivery at the St. Paul 1E town border station, located
in Washington County, Minnesota. The increased deliveries to NSP would
occur within Northern's currently effective service agreements. NSP has
requested the upgrade of the delivery point to accommodate growth in
this area.
Comment date: October 21, 1994, in accordance with Standard
Paragraph G at the end of this notice.
Standard Paragraphs
F. Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with
reference to said application should on or before the comment date,
file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.
20426, a motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the
requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18
CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act
(18 CFR 157.10). All protests filed with the Commission will be
considered by it in determining the appropriate action to be taken but
will not serve to make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any
person wishing to become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a
party in any hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in
accordance with the Commission's Rules.
Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in
and subject to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, a hearing will be
held without further notice before the Commission or its designee on
this application if no motion to intervene is filed within the time
required herein, if the Commission on its own review of the matter
finds that a grant of the certificate and/or permission and approval
for the proposed abandonment are required by the public convenience and
necessity. If a motion for leave to intervene is timely filed, or if
the Commission on its own motion believes that a formal hearing is
required, further notice of such hearing will be duly given.
Under the procedure herein provided for, unless otherwise advised,
it will be unnecessary for applicant to appear or be represented at the
hearing.
G. Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor,
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 94-22574 Filed 9-12-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
