94-22594. Dairyland Power Cooperative; La Crosse Boiling Water Reactor; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 13, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-22594]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: September 13, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [Docket No. 50-409]
    
     
    
    Dairyland Power Cooperative; La Crosse Boiling Water Reactor; 
    Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is 
    considering the issuance of a Confirmatory Order modifying the August 
    7, 1991, Order (the Decommissioning Order) which authorized the 
    Dairyland Power Cooperative (DPC, the licensee) to decommission the La 
    Crosse Boiling Water Reactor (LACBWR). LACBWR is located 19 miles south 
    of La Crosse, Wisconsin.
    
    Environmental Assessment
    
    Identification of Proposed Action
    
        The proposed action would allow DPC to: (i) make limited changes in 
    the facility or procedures as described the Decommissioning Plan; and 
    (ii) conduct certain tests and experiments not described in the 
    Decommissioning Plan, without prior NRC approval. The licensee 
    requested, by letters dated August 2, and August 5, 1994, that the NRC 
    issue an order that revises the Decommissioning Order to allow DPC 
    limited flexibility under its Decommissioning Plan. This action is 
    consistent with the flexibility under 10 CFR 50.59 afforded to a 
    licensee authorized to operate a production or utilization facility and 
    afforded by other Decommissioning Orders issued by the NRC.
    
    The Need for the Proposed Action
    
        The LACBWR has been shut down since April 30, 1987. All spent fuel 
    has been removed from the reactor and is stored in the fuel element 
    storage well.
        The licensee's authority to operate LACBWR was removed by license 
    Amendment No. 56, dated August 4, 1987. The licensee is authorized to 
    possess but not operate the LACBWR. The NRC in its Order 
    (Decommissioning Order) of August 7, 1991, directed DPC to decommission 
    the reactor facility in accordance with its Decommissioning Plan and 
    the Commission's regulations. This action was taken in response to the 
    licensee's application for authorization to decommission the facility, 
    dated December 21, 1987, as revised February 22, 1988, September 9, 
    1988, September 30, 1988, January 26, 1989, March 28, 1989, June 6, 
    1989, October 3, 1989, July 25, 1990, May 10, 1991, and July 25, 1991. 
    Neither the August 7, 1991, Decommissioning Order which directed the 
    licensee to decommission the reactor facility, nor the approved 
    Decommissioning Plan, contained an approved procedure that would allow 
    the licensee to: (i) make changes in the facility or procedures as 
    described the Decommissioning Plan; or (ii) conduct tests or 
    experiments not described in the Decommissioning Plan, without prior 
    NRC approval. The LACBWR is currently in SAFSTOR in accordance with the 
    approved LACBWR Decommissioning Plan. This Confirmatory Order would 
    modify the Decommissioning Order and allow the licensee to: (i) make 
    limited changes in the facility or procedures as described the 
    Decommissioning Plan; or (ii) conduct certain tests or experiments not 
    described in the Decommissioning Plan without prior NRC approval.
    
    Environmental Impact of the Proposed Action
    
        The proposed action, procedural in nature, does not involve any 
    significant environmental impacts. The proposed Confirmatory Order 
    modifies the Decommissioning Order to allow the licensee to: (i) make 
    changes in the facility or procedures as described the Decommissioning 
    Plan; or (ii) conduct tests or experiments not described in the 
    Decommissioning Plan without prior NRC approval provided they do not 
    involve an unreviewed safety question or a significant environmental 
    impact not previously evaluated.
        Since the proposed action does not involve a change in plant 
    operation or configuration, there is reasonable assurance that the 
    proposed action would not increase the probability or the consequence 
    of an accident or reduce the margin of safety. No changes would be made 
    in the types or quantities of effluent that may be released offsite. 
    Further, there would be no significant increase in the allowable 
    individual or cumulative radiation exposure.
        Accordingly, the NRC concludes that this proposed action would 
    result in no significant radiological environmental impact.
        With regard to potential non-radiological impacts, the proposed 
    action does not affect non-radiological plant effluent and has no other 
    environmental impact. Therefore, the NRC concludes that there are no 
    significant non-radiological impacts associated with the proposed 
    action.
    
    Alternatives to the Proposed Action
    
        Since the NRC has concluded that there are no measurable 
    environmental impacts associated with the proposed action, any 
    alternative with equal or greater environmental impacts need not be 
    evaluated. The principal alternative would be to deny the request. This 
    would not significantly reduce environmental impacts of plant 
    decommissioning and would result in reduced flexibility.
    
    Alternative Use of Resources
    
        This action does not involve the use of resources not previously 
    considered in the Environmental Assessment included as an enclosure to 
    the Decommissioning Order.
    
    Agencies and Persons Consulted
    
        This Environmental Assessment was prepared by the NRC staff, 
    primarily within the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, 
    Rockville, Maryland. The NRC staff consulted with a representative of 
    the State of Wisconsin regarding the environmental impact of the 
    proposed action, and the State did not provide comments.
    
    Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        Based upon this Environmental Assessment, the staff concludes that 
    the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the quality 
    of the human environment. Therefore, the NRC has determined not to 
    prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed Confirmatory 
    Order.
        For further details with respect to this action, see the licensee 
    application for the order dated August 2, and August 5, 1994, which is 
    available for public inspection at the Commission Public Document Room, 
    Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC 20555, and at the 
    La Crosse Public Library, 800 Main Street, La Crosse, Wisconsin 54601.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 2nd day of September, 1994.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Michael F. Weber,
    Acting Chief, Low-Level Waste and Decommissioning Projects Branch, 
    Division of Waste Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and 
    Safeguards.
    [FR Doc. 94-22594 Filed 9-12-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
09/13/1994
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-22594
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: September 13, 1994, Docket No. 50-409