[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 13, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-22618]
[[Page Unknown]]
[Federal Register: September 13, 1994]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[Summary Notice No. PE-94-33]
Petitions for Exemption; Summary of Petitions Received;
Dispositions of Petitions Issued
agency: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
action: Notice of petitions for exemption received and of dispositions
of prior petitions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
summary: Pursuant to FAA's rulemaking provisions governing the
application, processing, and disposition of petitions for exemption (14
CFR Part 11), this notice contains a summary of certain petitions
seeking relief from specified requirements of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR chapter I), dispositions of certain petitions
previously received, and corrections. The purpose of this notice is to
improve the public's awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of
FAA's regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor the
inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to
affect the legal status of any petition or its final disposition.
dates: Comments on petitions received must identify the petition docket
number involved and must be received on or before October 3, 1994.
addresses: Send comments on any petition in triplicate to: Federal
Aviation Administration, Office of the Chief Counsel, Attn: Rule Docket
(AGC-200), Petition Docket No. ____, 800 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, D.C. 20591.
The petition, any comments received, and a copy of any final
disposition are filed in the assigned regulatory docket and are
available for examination in the Rules Docket (AGC-200), Room 915G, FAA
Headquarters Building (FOB 10A), 800 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, D.C. 20591; telephone (202) 267-3132.
for further information contact: Mr. D. Michael Smith, Office of
Rulemaking (ARM-1), Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267-7470.
This notice is published pursuant to paragraphs (c), (e), and (g)
of Sec. 11.27 of Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
Part 11).
Issued in Washington, D.C., on September 6, 1994.
Donald P. Byrne,
Assistant Chief Counsel of Regulations.
Petitions for Exemption
Docket No.: 13199.
Petitioner: American Airlines.
Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 61.58(c)(1) and (d), 61.63(d)
(1) and (3), 61.157(d) (1) and (2), and Appendix A of part 61.
Description of Relief Sought: To amend condition 6(a) of Exemption
No. 4652, as amended. Condition 6(a) requires each instructor, who does
not hold a CFI certificate, to hold at least a ground instructor
certificate with an instrument rating and an advanced rating. This
amendment, if granted, would allow instructors who were previously
qualified under current Exemption No. 4652C to continue to be qualified
under proposed Exemption No. 4652D.
Docket No.: 27769.
Petitioner: Ballistic Recovery Systems, Inc.
Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 91.307(c).
Description of Relief Sought: To allow a General Aviation Recovery
Device to be used as an alternative to requiring each occupant to wear
an approved parachute during certain intentional maneuvers in civil
aircraft.
Docket No.: 27850.
Petitioner: Dassault Aviation.
Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 25.562(c).
Description of Relief Sought: To permit certification of Dassault
Aviation's new model Falcon 2000 airplane, while allowing temporary
exemption from the occupant injury criteria of the FAR for side-facing
sofas until such time that suitable criteria can be established.
Dispositions of Petitions
Docket No.: 23647.
Petitioner: Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.
Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 141.65.
Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To extend Exemption No.
3859, as amended, which allows ERAU to recommend graduates of its
certified flight instructor courses for certification without their
taking the FAA flight or written tests.
GRANT, August 26, 1994, Exemption No. 3859H
Docket No.: 26245.
Petitioner: Airline Crew Training Corporation.
Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 61.55(b)(2); 61.56(c)(1);
61.57(c) and (d); 61.58(c)(1) and (d); 61.63(c)(2) and (d)(2) and (3);
61.65(c), (e)(2), (e)(3), and (g); 61.67(d)(2); 61.157(d)(1) and (2),
and (e)(1) and (2); 61.191(c); and appendix A of part 61.
Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit Airline Crew
Training Corporation to use FAA-approved simulators to meet certain
flight experience requirements of part 61.
GRANT, August 24, 1994, Exemption No. 5183C
Docket No.: 26568.
Petitioner: Northwest Aerospace Training Corporation.
Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 61.55(b)(2); 61.56(c)(1);
61.57(c) and (d); 61.58(c)(1) and (d); 61.63(c)(2) and (d)(2) and (3);
61.65(c), (e)(2), (e)(3), and (g); 61.67(d)(2); 61.157(d)(1) and (2),
and (e)(1) and (2); 61.191(c); and appendix A of part 61.
Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit NATCO to use
FAA-approved simulators to meet certain flight experience requirements
of part 61.
GRANT, August 24, 1994, Exemption No. 5338B
Docket No.: 26630.
Petitioner: Erickson Air-Crane Company.
Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 133.19(a)(3) and 133.51.
Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit Erickson to
perform certain rotorcraft external-load operations (i.e., logging and
fire-fighting) in the United States using an Erickson owned Canadian
registered S-64 Sikorsky helicopter.
GRANT, August 24, 1994, Exemption No. 5959
Docket No.: 26819.
Petitioner: Vector Air Services, Inc.
Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 61.55(b)(2); 61.56(c)(1);
61.57(c) and (d); 61.58(c)(1) and (d); 61.63(c)(2) and (d)(2) and (3);
61.65(c), (e)(2), (e)(3), and (g); 61.67(d)(2); 61.157(d)(1) and (2),
and (e)(1) and (2); 61.191(c); and appendix A of part 61.
Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit Vector to use
FAA-approved simulators to meet certain flight experience requirements
of part 61.
GRANT, August 24, 1994, Exemption No. 5493A
Docket No.: 26869.
Petitioner: Practical Flight Systems, Inc.
Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 61.55(b)(2); 61.56(c)(1);
61.57(c) and (d); 61.58(c)(1) and (d); 61.63(c)(2) and (d)(2) and (3);
61.65(c), (e)(2), (e)(3), and (g); 61.67(d)(2); 61.157(d)(1) and (2),
and (e)(1) and (2); 61.191(c); and appendix A of part 61.
Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit PFS to use FAA-
approved simulators to meet certain flight experience requirements of
part 61.
GRANT, August 24, 1994, Exemption No. 5497A
Docket No.: 26891.
Petitioner: Jet Flight International, Inc.
Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 61.55(b)(2); 61.56(c)(1);
61.57(c) and (d); 61.58(c)(1) and (d); 61.63(c)(2) and (d)(2) and (3);
61.65(c), (e)(2), (e)(3), and (g); 61.67(d)(2); 61.157(d)(1) and (2),
and (e)(1) and (2); 61.191(c); and appendix A of part 61.
Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit JFI to use FAA-
approved simulators to meet certain flight experience requirements of
part 61.
GRANT, August 24, 1994, Exemption No. 5496A
Docket No.: 26915.
Petitioner: Pan Am International Flight Academy, Inc.
Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 61.55(b)(2); 61.56(c)(1);
61.57(c) and (d); 61.58(c)(1) and (d); 61.63(c)(2) and (d)(2) and (3);
61.65(c), (e)(2), (e)(3), and (g); 61.67(d)(2); 61.157(d)(1) and (2),
and (e)(1) and (2); 61.191(c); and appendix A of part 61.
Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit Pan Am to use
FAA-approved simulators to meet certain flight experience requirements
of part 61.
GRANT, August 24, 1994, Exemption No. 5495A
Docket No. 27381.
Petitioner: Northwest Airlines, Inc.
Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 108.17(a)(4).
Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To provide relief from
the requirement to issue individual dosimeters to each screener at
security checkpoints where X-ray systems are in use. This relief is
requested for all certificate holders now operations X-ray systems for
the inspection of carry-on or checked articles.
DENIAL, August 17, 1994, Exemption No. 5955
Docket No. 27620.
Petitioner: Douglas A. Balasco.
Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 65.77.
Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To permit Mr. Balasco to
complete the remainder of his training for a mechanic certificate under
the supervision of a certificated airframe and powerplant mechanic in
the Albany/Schenectady, New York, area, instead of at a certificated
aviation maintenance technician school.
DENIAL, August 17, 1994, Exemption No. 5951
Docket No. 27786.
Petitioner: Douglas Aircraft Company.
Sections of the FAR Affected: 14 CFR 91.511.
Description of Relief Sought/Disposition: To provide dispatch
relief for MD-11 aircraft operators with an inoperative flight
management computer.
WITHDRAWAL, August 8, 1994
[FR Doc. 94-22618 Filed 9-12-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
