95-22730. Cyclohexanecarbonitrile, 1,3,3-trimethyl-5-oxo-; Revocation of a Significant New Use Rule  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 177 (Wednesday, September 13, 1995)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 47531-47533]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-22730]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    40 CFR Part 721
    
    [OPPTS-50601F; FRL-4926-1]
    
    
    Cyclohexanecarbonitrile, 1,3,3-trimethyl-5-oxo-; Revocation of a 
    Significant New Use Rule
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to revoke a significant new use rule (SNUR) 
    promulgated under section 5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control Act 
    (TSCA) for cyclohexanecarbonitrile, 1,3,3-trimethyl-5-oxo- based on 
    receipt of new data. The data indicate that for purposes of TSCA 
    section 5, the substance will not present an unreasonable risk to human 
    health.
    DATES: Written comments must be received by October 13, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: All comments must be sent in triplicate to: OPPT Document 
    Control Officer (7407), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, 
    Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. E-G99, 401 M St., SW., Washington, 
    DC 20460. Comments that are confidential must be clearly marked 
    confidential business information (CBI). If CBI is claimed, an 
    additional sanitized copy must also be submitted. Nonconfidential 
    versions of comments on this proposed rule will be placed in the 
    rulemaking record and will be available for public inspection. Comments 
    should include the docket control number. The docket control number for 
    the chemical substance in this SNUR is OPPTS-50601F. Unit III.
    
    [[Page 47532]]
    
    of this preamble contains additional information on submitting comments 
    containing CBI.
    
        Comments and data may also be submitted electronically by sending 
    electronic mail (e-mail) to: ncic@epamail.epa.gov. Electronic comments 
    must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the use of special 
    characters and any form of encryption. Comments and data will also be 
    accepted on disks in WordPerfect in 5.1 file format or ASCII file 
    format. All comments and data in electronic form must be identified by 
    the docket number OPPTS-50601F. No CBI should be submitted through e-
    mail. Electronic comments on this proposed rule may be filed online at 
    many Federal Depository Libraries. Additional information on electronic 
    submissions can be found in Unit IV. of this document.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan B. Hazen, Director, 
    Environmental Assistance Division (7408), Office of Pollution 
    Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. E-543A, 401 
    M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460, Telephone: (202) 554-1404, TDD: (202) 
    554-0551, e-mail: TSCA-Hotline@epamail.epa.gov.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of September 23, 
    1992 (57 FR 44050), EPA issued a SNUR establishing significant new uses 
    for cyclohexanecarbonitrile, 1,3,3-trimethyl-5-oxo-. Because of 
    additional data EPA has received for this substance, EPA is proposing 
    to revoke this SNUR.
    
    I. Proposed Revocation
    
        EPA is proposing to revoke the significant new use and 
    recordkeeping requirements for cyclohexanecarbonitrile, 1,3,3-
    trimethyl-5-oxo- under 40 CFR part 721, subpart E. In this unit, EPA 
    provides a brief description for the substance, including its PMN 
    number, chemical name (generic name if the specific name is claimed as 
    CBI), CAS number (if assigned), basis for the revocation of the section 
    5(e) consent order for the substance, and the CFR citation removed in 
    the regulatory text section of this proposed rule. Further background 
    information for the substance is contained in the rulemaking record 
    referenced in Unit IV. of this preamble.
    
    PMN Number: P-90-1358
    
    Chemical name: Cyclohexanecarbonitrile, 1,3,3-trimethyl-5-oxo-.
    CAS number: 7027-11-4.
    Effective date of revocation of section 5(e) consent order: October 17, 
    1994.
    Basis for revocation of section 5(e) consent order: The order was 
    revoked based on test data submitted under the terms of the consent 
    order. Based on the Agency's analysis of the submitted data, EPA has 
    sufficient information to determine, for purposes of TSCA section 5, 
    that the manufacture, processing, distribution in commerce, use, or 
    disposal of the PMN substance will not present an unreasonable risk to 
    human health. Accordingly, EPA has determined that further regulation 
    under section 5(e) is not warranted at this time.
    Toxicity testing results: The results of the 90-day subchronic study in 
    rats which included a functional observational battery, an evaluation 
    of motor activity, and specific histological examination of the central 
    and autonomic nervous system, show that the PMN substance P-90-1358 did 
    not produce signs of systemic toxicity in either sex of rats when 
    administered in feed. At the 4,500 ppm (parts per million) dose, which 
    was the highest dose tested, food consumption and weight gain in 
    females were depressed. However, it is uncertain whether the depression 
    of body weight in females was due to toxicity or unpalatability of the 
    test material. There were no signs of neurotoxicity at any dose tested. 
    Upon microscopic examination, there was no dose-related trend in 
    incidence of abnormal findings. There was no indication whether cyanide 
    was or was not released from the PMN substance. In addition, the study 
    showed that the PMN substance does not act like the analogue, 
    isophorone.
    CFR citation: 40 CFR 721.2225
    
    II. Background and Rationale for Proposed Revocation of the Rule
    
        During review of the PMN submitted for the chemical substance that 
    is the subject of this proposed revocation, EPA concluded that 
    regulation was warranted under section 5(e) of TSCA pending the 
    development of information sufficient to make a reasoned evaluation of 
    the environmental effects of the substance, and that the substance is 
    expected to be produced in substantial quantities and there may be 
    significant or substantial human exposure. EPA identified the tests 
    necessary to make a reasoned evaluation of the risks posed by the 
    substance to the human health. Based on these findings, a section 5(e) 
    consent order was negotiated with the PMN submitter and a SNUR was 
    promulgated. EPA reviewed testing conducted by the PMN submitter 
    pursuant to the consent order for the substance and determined that the 
    information available was sufficient to make a reasoned evaluation of 
    the health effects of the substance. EPA concluded that, for the 
    purposes of TSCA section 5, the substance will not present an 
    unreasonable risk and consequently revoked the section 5(e) consent 
    order. The proposed revocation of SNUR provisions for the substance 
    designated herein is consistent with the revocation of the section 5(e) 
    order. In light of the above, EPA is proposing a revocation of SNUR 
    provisions for this chemical substance. When this revocation becomes 
    final, EPA will no longer require notice of any company's intent to 
    manufacture, import, or process this substance. In addition, export 
    notification under section 12(b) of TSCA will no longer be required.
    III. Comments Containing Confidential Business Information
        Any person who submits comments claimed as CBI must mark the 
    comments as ``confidential,'' ``trade secret,'' or other appropriate 
    designation. Comments not claimed as confidential at the time of 
    submission will be placed in the public file. Any comments marked as 
    confidential will be treated in accordance with the procedures in 40 
    CFR part 2. Any party submitting comments claimed to be confidential 
    must prepare and submit a public version of the comments that EPA can 
    place in the public file.
    IV. Rulemaking Record
        The record for the rule which EPA is proposing to revoke was 
    established at OPPTS-50601 (P-90-1358). This record includes 
    information considered by the Agency in developing the rule and 
    includes the test data that formed the basis for this proposal.
        A record has been established for this rulemaking under docket 
    number OPPTS-50601F (including comments and data submitted 
    electronically as described below). A public version of this record, 
    including printed, paper versions of electronic comments, which does 
    not include any information claimed as CBI, is available for inspection 
    from 12 noon to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal 
    holidays. The public record is located in the TSCA Nonconfidential 
    Information Center, Rm. NE-B607, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460.
        Electronic comments can be sent directly to EPA at:
        ncic@epamail.epa.gov
    
        Electronic comments must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the 
    use of special characters and any form of encryption.
        The official record for this rulemaking, as well as the public 
    version, as described above will be kept
    
    [[Page 47533]]
    
    in paper form. Accordingly, EPA will transfer all comments received 
    electronically into printed, paper form as they are received and will 
    place the paper copies in the official rulemaking record which will 
    also include all comments submitted directly in writing. The official 
    rulemaking record is the paper record maintained at the address in 
    addresses at the beginning of this document.
    
    V. Regulatory Assessment Requirements
    
        EPA is proposing to revoke the requirements of the rule. Any costs 
    or burdens associated with the rule will also be eliminated when the 
    rule is revoked. Therefore, EPA finds that no costs or burdens must be 
    assessed under Executive Order 12866, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 
    U.S.C. 605(b)), or the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et 
    seq.).
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 721
    
        Environmental protection, Chemicals, Hazardous materials, Reporting 
    and recordkeeping requirements, Significant new uses.
    
        Dated: September 1, 1995.
    Charles M. Auer,
    Director, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and 
    Toxics.
    
        Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR part 721 be amended as 
    follows:
    
    PART 721--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 721 would continue to read as 
    follows:
        Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2604, 2607, and 2625(c).
    
    
    Sec. 721.2225  [Removed]
    
        2. By removing Sec. 721.2225.
    [FR Doc. 95-22730 Filed 9-12-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    

Document Information

Published:
09/13/1995
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
95-22730
Dates:
Written comments must be received by October 13, 1995.
Pages:
47531-47533 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
OPPTS-50601F, FRL-4926-1
PDF File:
95-22730.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 721.2225