99-23720. Special Conditions; Meridian PA-46-400TP  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 176 (Monday, September 13, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 49365-49367]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-23720]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 23
    
    [Docket No. CE153, Special Condition 23-096-SC]
    
    
    Special Conditions; Meridian PA-46-400TP
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final special conditions; request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued to The New Piper Aircraft, 
    Inc., 2926 Piper Drive, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 for a type 
    certificate for the Meridian PA-46-400TP airplane. This airplane will 
    have novel and unusual design features when compared to the state of 
    technology envisaged in the applicable airworthiness standards. These 
    novel and unusual design features include the installation of 
    electronic flight instrument system (EFIS) displays for which the 
    applicable regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate 
    airworthiness standards for the protection of these systems from the 
    effects of high intensity radiated fields (HIRF). These special 
    conditions contain the additional safety standards that the 
    Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety 
    equivalent to the airworthiness standards applicable to these 
    airplanes.
    
    DATES: The effective date of these special conditions is August 27, 
    1999. Comments must be received on or before October 13, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed in duplicate to: Federal Aviation 
    Administration, Regional Counsel, ACE-7, Attention: Rules Docket Clerk, 
    Docket No. CE153, Room 1558, 601 East 12th Street, Kansas City, 
    Missouri 64106. All comments must be marked: Docket No. CE153. Comments 
    may be inspected in the Rules Docket weekdays, except Federal holidays, 
    between 7:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ervin Dvorak, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Standards Office (ACE-110), Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft 
    Certification Service, Federal Aviation Administration, 601 East 12th 
    Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone (816) 426-6941.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA has determined that notice and 
    opportunity for prior public comment hereon are impracticable because 
    these procedures would significantly delay issuance of the approval 
    design and thus delivery of the affected aircraft. In addition, the 
    substance of these special conditions has been subject to the public 
    comment process in several prior instances with no substantive comments 
    received. The FAA, therefore, finds that good cause exists for making 
    these special conditions effective upon issuance.
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to submit such written data, views, 
    or arguments as they may desire. Communications should identify the 
    regulatory docket or notice number and be submitted in duplicate to the 
    address specified above. All communications received on or before the 
    closing date for comments will be considered by the Administrator. The 
    special conditions may be changed in light of the comments received. 
    All comments received will be available in the Rules Docket for 
    examination by interested persons, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact 
    with FAA personnel concerning this rulemaking will be filed in the 
    docket. Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their 
    comments submitted in response to this notice must include a self-
    addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: 
    ``Comments to CE153.'' The postcard will be date stamped and returned 
    to the commenter.
    
    Background
    
        On February 12, 1997, The New Piper Aircraft, Inc., 2926 Piper 
    Drive, Vero Beach, Florida 32960, made an application to the FAA for a 
    new Type Certificate for the Meridian PA-46-400TP airplane. The 
    Meridian is a derivative of the PA-46-350P Malibu Mirage currently 
    approved under TC No. A25SO. The proposed modification incorporates a 
    novel or unusual design feature, such as digital avionics consisting of 
    an EFIS, that is vulnerable to HIRF external to the airplane.
    
    Type Certification Basis
    
        Under the provisions of 14 CFR part 21, Sec. 21.101, The New Piper 
    Aircraft, Inc., must show that the Meridian PA-
    
    [[Page 49366]]
    
    46-400TP meets the following provisions, or the applicable regulations 
    in effect on the date of application for the change to the Meridian PA-
    6-400TP:
        Federal Aviation Regulations part 23 effective February 1, 1965, as 
    amended by Amendments 23-1 through 23-52; Federal Aviation Regulations 
    part 34 effective September 10, 1990, as amended by the amendment in 
    effect on the date of certification; Federal Aviation Regulations part 
    36 effective December 1, 1969, as amended by amendment 36-1 through the 
    amendment in effect on the day of certification; The Noise Control Act 
    of 1972; exemptions, if any; and the special conditions adopted by this 
    rulemaking action.
    
    Discussion
    
        If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness 
    standards do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards 
    because of novel or unusual design features of an airplane, special 
    conditions are prescribed under the provisions of Sec. 21.16 to 
    establish a level of safety equivalent to that established in the 
    regulations.
        Special conditions are normally issued in accordance with 
    Sec. 11.49, after public notice, as required by Secs. 11.28 and 
    11.29(b), and become a part of the type certification basis in 
    accordance with Sec. 21.101(b)(2).
        Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which 
    they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended 
    later to include any other model that incorporates the same novel or 
    unusual design feature, or should any other model already included on 
    the same type certificate be modified to incorporate the same novel or 
    unusual design feature, the special conditions would also apply to the 
    other model under the provisions of Sec. 21.101(a)(1).
    
    Novel or Unusual Design Features
    
        The New Piper Aircraft, Inc., plans to incorporate certain novel 
    and unusual design features into an airplane for which the 
    airworthiness standards do not contain adequate or appropriate safety 
    standards for protection from the effects of HIRF. These features 
    include EFIS, which are susceptible to the HIRF environment, that were 
    not envisaged by the existing regulations for this type of airplane.
    
    Protection of Systems From High Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF)
    
        Recent advances in technology have given rise to the application in 
    aircraft designs of advanced electrical and electronic systems that 
    perform functions required for continued safe flight and landing. Due 
    to the use of sensitive solid state advanced components in analog and 
    digital electronics circuits, these advanced systems are readily 
    responsive to the transient effects of induced electrical current and 
    voltage caused by the HIRF. The HIRF can degrade electronic systems 
    performance by damaging components or upsetting system functions.
        Furthermore, the HIRF environment has undergone a transformation 
    that was not foreseen when the current requirements were developed. 
    Higher energy levels are radiated from transmitters that are used for 
    radar, radio, and television. Also, the number of transmitters has 
    increased significantly. There is also uncertainty concerning the 
    effectiveness of airframe shielding for HIRF. Furthermore, coupling to 
    cockpit-installed equipment through the cockpit window apertures is 
    undefined.
        The combined effect of the technological advances in airplane 
    design and the changing environment has resulted in an increased level 
    of vulnerability of electrical and electronic systems required for the 
    continued safe flight and landing of the airplane. Effective measures 
    against the effects of exposure to HIRF must be provided by the design 
    and installation of these systems. The accepted maximum energy levels 
    in which civilian airplane system installations must be capable of 
    operating safely are based on surveys and analysis of existing radio 
    frequency emitters. These special conditions require that the airplane 
    be evaluated under these energy levels for the protection of the 
    electronic system and its associated wiring harness. These external 
    threat levels, which are lower than previous required values, are 
    believed to represent the worst case to which an airplane would be 
    exposed in the operating environment.
        These special conditions require qualification of systems that 
    perform critical functions, as installed in aircraft, to the defined 
    HIRF environment in paragraph 1 or, as an option to a fixed value using 
    laboratory tests, in paragraph 2, as follows:
        (1) The applicant may demonstrate that the operation and 
    operational capability of the installed electrical and electronic 
    systems that perform critical functions are not adversely affected when 
    the aircraft is exposed to the HIRF environment defined below:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Field strength
                                                           (volts per meter)
                          Frequency                      -------------------
                                                            Peak     Average
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    10 kHz--100 kHz.....................................        50        50
    100 kHz--500 kHz....................................        50        50
    500 kHz--2 MHz......................................        50        50
    2 MHz--30 MHz.......................................       100       100
    30 MHz--70 MHz......................................        50        50
    70 MHz--100 MHz.....................................        50        50
    100 MHz--200 MHz....................................       100       100
    200 MHz--400 MHz....................................       100       100
    400 MHz--700 MHz....................................       700        50
    700 MHz--1 GHz......................................       700       100
    1 GHz--2 GHz........................................      2000       200
    2 GHz--4 GHz........................................      3000       200
    4 GHz--6 GHz........................................      3000       200
    6 GHz--8 GHz........................................      1000       200
    8 GHz--12 GHz.......................................      3000       300
    12 GHz--18 GHz......................................      2000       200
    18 GHz--40 GHz......................................       600      200
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    The field strengths are expressed in terms of peak root-mean-square
      (rms) values.
    
    or,
        (2) The applicant may demonstrate by a system test and analysis 
    that the electrical and electronic systems that perform critical 
    functions can withstand a minimum threat of 100 volts per meter, peak 
    electrical field strength, from 10 kHz to 18 GHz. When using this test 
    to show compliance with the HIRF requirements, no credit is given for 
    signal attenuation due to installation.
        A preliminary hazard analysis must be performed by the applicant, 
    for approval by the FAA, to identify either electrical or electronic 
    systems, or both, that perform critical functions. The term 
    ``critical'' means those functions whose failure would contribute to, 
    or cause, a failure condition that would prevent the continued safe 
    flight and landing of the airplane. The systems identified by the 
    hazard analysis that perform critical functions are candidates for the 
    application of HIRF requirements. A system may perform both critical 
    and non-critical functions. Primary electronic flight display systems, 
    and their associated components, perform critical functions such as 
    attitude, altitude, and airspeed indication. The HIRF requirements 
    apply only to critical functions.
        Compliance with HIRF requirements may be demonstrated by tests, 
    analysis, models, similarity with existing systems, or any combination 
    of these. Service experience alone is not acceptable since normal 
    flight operations may not include an exposure to the HIRF environment. 
    Reliance on a system with similar design features for redundancy as a 
    means of protection against the effects of external HIRF is generally 
    insufficient since all elements of a redundant system are likely to be 
    exposed to the fields concurrently.
    
    [[Page 49367]]
    
    Applicability
    
        As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to The 
    New Piper Aircraft, Inc., Meridian PA-46-400TP. Should The New Piper 
    Aircraft, Inc., apply at a later date for a change to the type 
    certificate to include any other model incorporating the same novel or 
    unusual design feature, the special conditions would apply to that 
    model as well under the provisions of Sec. 21.101(a)(1).
    
    Conclusion
    
        This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features 
    on one model of airplane. It is not a rule of general applicability and 
    affects only the applicant who applied to the FAA for approval of these 
    features on the airplane.
        The substance of these special conditions has been subjected to the 
    notice and comment period in several prior instances and has been 
    derived without substantive change from those previously issued. It is 
    unlikely that prior public comment would result in a significant change 
    from the substance contained herein. For this reason, and because a 
    delay would significantly affect the certification of the airplane, 
    which is imminent, the FAA has determined that prior public notice and 
    comment are unnecessary and impracticable, and good cause exists for 
    adopting these special conditions upon issuance. The FAA is requesting 
    comments to allow interested persons to submit views that may not have 
    been submitted in response to the prior opportunities for comment 
    described above.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 23
    
        Aircraft, Aviation safety, Signs and symbols.
    
    Citation
    
        The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113 and 44701; 14 CFR part 21, 
    Secs. 21.16 and 21.17; and 14 CFR part 11, Secs. 11.28 and 11.49.
    
    The Special Conditions
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of 
    the type certification basis for The New Piper Aircraft, Inc., Meridian 
    PA-46-400TP airplane:
        1. Protection of Electrical and Electronic Systems from High 
    Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF).
        Each system that performs critical functions must be designed and 
    installed to ensure that the operations, and operational capabilities 
    of these systems to perform critical functions, are not adversely 
    affected when the airplane is exposed to high intensity radiated 
    electromagnetic fields external to the airplane.
        2. For the purpose of these special conditions, the following 
    definition applies:
        Critical Functions: Functions whose failure would contribute to, or 
    cause, a failure condition that would prevent the continued safe flight 
    and landing of the airplane.
    
        Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on August 27, 1999.
    Michael Gallagher,
    Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
    [FR Doc. 99-23720 Filed 9-10-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
8/27/1999
Published:
09/13/1999
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final special conditions; request for comments.
Document Number:
99-23720
Dates:
The effective date of these special conditions is August 27, 1999. Comments must be received on or before October 13, 1999.
Pages:
49365-49367 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. CE153, Special Condition 23-096-SC
PDF File:
99-23720.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 11.49