99-23763. Final Environmental Impact Statement for General Management Plan; Whiskeytown Unit, Whiskeytown-Shasta-Trinity National Recreation Area; Notice of Availability  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 176 (Monday, September 13, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 49501-49502]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-23763]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    National Park Service
    
    
    Final Environmental Impact Statement for General Management Plan; 
    Whiskeytown Unit, Whiskeytown-Shasta-Trinity National Recreation Area; 
    Notice of Availability
    
    SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental 
    Policy Act of 1969 (Pub.L. 91-190 as amended), the National Park 
    Service, Department of the Interior, has prepared a final environmental 
    impact statement assessing the potential impacts of the proposed 
    General Management Plan for Whiskeytown Unit, Whiskeytown-Shasta-
    Trinity National Recreation Area, Shasta County, California. Once 
    approved, the plan will guide the management of the unit over the next 
    15 years.
    
    PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES: The final General Management Plan and 
    Environmental Impact Statement presents a proposal and three 
    alternatives for the management, use, and development of Whiskeytown 
    Unit. The proposed general management plan includes provisions for 
    preserving significant natural and cultural resources and for restoring 
    the backcountry to more natural conditions through watershed 
    restoration activities. The plan provides for increasing the range and 
    depth of interpretive services, expands opportunities for backcountry 
    use, and manages recreation at Whiskeytown Lake to provide 
    opportunities for tranquil recreation experiences. To facilitate more 
    tranquil experience, the use of personal watercraft at the reservoir is 
    discontinued and enforcement of existing noise standards is increased.
        Alternative A: No Action, would continue the current situation at 
    Whiskeytown. Management focus would remain on the lake and natural
    
    [[Page 49502]]
    
    and cultural resource values would continue to decline because of the 
    lack of human and financial resources for their management and 
    protection.
        Alternative B: Minimum Requirements, would be similar to 
    Alternative C in terms of provisions for resource management and 
    protection, but would provide fewer visitor services. The visitor 
    service emphasis would continue to be focused on the lake and on safety 
    and visitor protection, with only limited commitments to 
    interpretation. The existing range of recreation uses, including the 
    use of personal watercraft, would continue.
        Alternative D: Expanded Recreation, retains the current management 
    focus on active water-based recreation, and increases the capacity of 
    the lake to accommodate use by adding a major new developed area near 
    the mouth of Boulder Creek. Major new utility infrastructure would be 
    required to support this development, and South Shore Drive would be 
    widened, realigned, and paved to provide access. The existing spectrum 
    of recreation uses on the lake, including use of personal watercraft, 
    would be retained. However, a zoning plan would separate the reservoir 
    into a low-speed zone, where personal watercraft use would be 
    discouraged, and an unrestricted zone where all types of activities 
    would be accommodated.
    
    Background
    
        The Draft EIS/GMP was released for a 75-day public review ending 
    November 30, 1998. Altogether nine public meetings were held in local 
    communities. Both the Draft and Final documents evaluate the same 
    Proposed Action and Alternatives. The environmental consequences of the 
    alternatives are fully documented in the Final EIS. No significant 
    adverse impacts are foreseen from the three Action Alternatives, 
    because the plans include provisions to avoid or mitigate potentially 
    significant impacts. However, the No-Action Alternative would result in 
    significant long-term impacts to natural and cultural resources due to 
    insufficient management and protection.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written comments or questions regarding the 
    final general management plan and environmental impact statement should 
    be directed to the Superintendent, Whiskeytown NRA, PO Box 188, 
    Whiskeytown, California 96095. Copies may be requested by contacting 
    the Superintendent at (530) 241-6584. The no-action period for the 
    FEIS/GMP will extend for thirty days after the Environmental Protection 
    Agency's notification of the filing of the document is published in the 
    Federal Register. Subsequently, the National Park Service will publish 
    a notice of the Record of Decision in the Federal Register. The 
    official responsible for the decision is the Regional Director, Pacific 
    West Region; the official responsible for implementation is the 
    Superintendent, Whiskeytown Unit.
    
        Dated: September 1, 1999.
    John J. Reynolds,
    Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
    [FR Doc. 99-23763 Filed 9-10-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
09/13/1999
Department:
National Park Service
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
99-23763
Pages:
49501-49502 (2 pages)
PDF File:
99-23763.pdf