94-22759. Computer Systems Laboratory Cooperative Agreement Program Availability of Funds  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 178 (Thursday, September 15, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-22759]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: September 15, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    National Institute of Standards and Technology
    [Docket No. 940549-4149]
    
     
    
    Computer Systems Laboratory Cooperative Agreement Program--
    Availability of Funds
    
    AGENCY: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Commerce.
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Computer Systems Laboratory (CSL) National Institute of 
    Standards and Technology (NIST) announces funding availability for 
    cooperative agreements to support its ongoing programs in the following 
    fields of research: Human--Computer Interfaces, Image Recognition, 
    Parallel Processing, Wireless communications, and Collaborative 
    Engineering. Specific details are outlined below in the Program 
    Objectives section. The purpose of the CSL program is to expand the 
    research being performed in these fields and disseminate resulting 
    information publicly for potential commercial use. Applicants must 
    submit an abbreviated proposal for preliminary screening; based on the 
    merit of the abbreviated proposal applicants will be advised whether a 
    full proposal should be submitted. A proposal shall deal with only one 
    area of research.
    
    DATES: Abbreviated proposals must be received at the address listed 
    below no later than 3 p.m. EDT on October 17, 1994. Proposals 
    transmitted by facsimile or electronic mail will not be accepted. Each 
    applicant submitting an abbreviated proposal will receive a written 
    recommendation regarding whether or not to prepare and submit a full 
    proposal. Such notification will be mailed/faxed on or before November 
    18, 1994. Full proposals must be received by 3 p.m. EDT on December 19, 
    1994. Cooperative agreements are expected to be awarded on or before 
    April 3, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Abbreviated proposals and full proposals should be submitted 
    to The National Institute of Standards and Technology, Computer Systems 
    Laboratory, Building 225, Room A216, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-0001; 
    Attention: Mary Ruhl. Each application package should be clearly marked 
    ``CSL Cooperative Agreement'' and identify the field of research.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Technical inquiries should be directed to the following Program 
    Managers: David Pallett, (301) 975-2935 [Manager, Speech Recognition]; 
    Donna Harman, (301) 975-3569 [Manager, Text Retrieval]; Charles Wilson, 
    (301) 975-2080 [Manager, Image Recognition]; Gordon Lyon, (301) 975-
    5679 [Manager, Parallel Processing]; Wayne McCoy, (301) 975-2984 
    [Manager, Signal Processing Systems]; Fernando Podio, (301) 975-2947 
    [Project Leader, Collaborative Engineering]. Inquiries should be 
    general in nature. Special inquiries as to a laboratory's needs, the 
    usefulness or merit of any particular project, or other inquiries with 
    the potential to provide any competitive advantage to an applicant are 
    not acceptable.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Authority
    
        As authorized by 15 U.S.C. 272, the Computer Systems Laboratory 
    conducts a basic and applied research program directly and through 
    cooperative agreements to eligible recipients.
    
    Program Description
    
        The objectives of the CSL Cooperative Agreement Program are to: (1) 
    Support its ongoing programs in the research fields of Human-Computer 
    Interfaces, Image Recognition, Parallel Processing, Wireless 
    Communications, and Collaborative Engineering; (2) expand the research 
    being performed in these fields; and (3) disseminate resulting 
    information publicly for potential commercial use. Federal assistance 
    is for cooperative agreements to support these objectives. Since CSL 
    has ongoing efforts in these research areas, the cooperative agreements 
    will involve a close working relationship between CSL and the 
    recipients. The results of the research will be made publicly available 
    for potential commercialization. The beneficiaries of this program are 
    commercial end users of various techniques that are furthered by the 
    research enabled by these cooperative agreements.
        All proposals submitted must be in accordance with the program 
    objectives listed below. Details on ongoing CSL research are provided 
    in order that applicants may submit proposals consistent with CSL 
    objectives. NIST shall retain title to all intangible property 
    developed under the cooperative agreement and shall make such property 
    available for public use without any obligation to the recipient. The 
    appropriate Program Manager for each field of research may be contacted 
    for clarification of the program objectives and activities.
        I. Human--Computer Interfaces
        The primary objective is to design and develop natural language 
    user interfaces (spoken and written) to computers. CSL efforts focus on 
    developing a spoken natural language user interface to electronic 
    library catalogs and improving natural language approaches for text 
    retrieval from large text collections.
    
    I.A. Spoken Language User Interfaces
    
        NIST has initiated a project to investigate the feasibility of 
    building a spoken natural language user interface to electronic 
    libraries, as a specific instance of spoken language user interfaces to 
    information services. The prototype system will be built from a 
    technology base of (D)ARPA-sponsored spoken language systems research 
    (e.g., Air Travel Information Systems).
        Late in FY 1994, a prototype system is to be built, consisting of a 
    library catalog information kiosk. Users will be able to use spoken 
    natural language to obtain library catalog information with simple 
    human-computer dialogues (e.g., ``What's the title of Julia Child's 
    recent book? Is it in the collection at this library? What is the 
    catalog number?''). For the initial prototype system, library catalog 
    data is to be accessed from a subset of Library of Congress MARC files 
    comprising of approximately 10,000 titles. In CY 1995, user-interface 
    data will be collected and the system capabilities enhanced. During 
    development, NIST will use the prototype system to collect a corpus of 
    spoken natural language data to be shared with the spoken language 
    research community through the Linguistic Data Consortium, to encourage 
    other researchers to join in development of this technology.
        In FY '96 and beyond, this technology is to be extended to permit 
    user spoken language access to on-line library catalog information over 
    ordinary telephone lines, and to provide expanded spoken natural 
    language information search and retrieval services for electronic 
    libraries. To accomplish this, more robust speech recognition 
    technology must be developed, and method of dialogue management 
    developed to paraphrase and summarize information for presentation 
    using speech synthesis technology.
    
    I.B. Text Retrieval
    
        The primary objective is to design and develop algorithms for 
    improving the performance of text retrieval against large amounts of 
    text. NIST has emphasized the testing of text retrieval algorithms 
    using natural language access against large amounts of text for the 
    past five years. This included building and testing a very fast 
    prototype retrieval system that allowed the use of simple English 
    phrases as the input query and returned a list of documents ranked in 
    order of likely relevance to that query. This project was followed by 
    continued research using this prototype.
        To continue this work, proposals most compatible with CSL's ongoing 
    research in text retrieval are requested that use the large (3 
    gigabyte) text collection developed at NIST for Text Retrieval 
    Conferences. This research should involve natural language approaches 
    to text retrieval, including document ranking. Specific topics are (1) 
    the use of multi-term content indicators for retrieval and (2) the 
    design of user tools to improve initial queries.
        The research involving these complex content indicators should be 
    directed toward identification of complex content indicators in brief 
    natural language statements of information need, efficiently search for 
    occurrences of them in an indexed document collection, and 
    incorporating the matches effectively into a weighting and ranking 
    model. These complex content indicators might range from simple word 
    combinations (e.g., phrases) to more abstract representations of words 
    or concepts and their semantic relationships (such as causal 
    relationships).
        The research into design of user tools can investigate the use of 
    relevance feedback in large test collections, implement user studies as 
    to what tools are needed by various user populations, or deal with the 
    design and testing of novel tools that allow users to improve their 
    queries.
    
    II. Image Recognition
    
        The primary objective in this research area is to design and 
    develop image pattern recognition algorithms which will generate 
    improved performance in commercial applications. The image pattern 
    recognition algorithms should address image segmentation and contextual 
    checking of classified images. Examples include efforts to improve 
    image segmentation of handwritten text or improved extraction of 
    specific visual material from cluttered images such as a face in a 
    crowd or a drawing in a technical document. This segmentation should 
    lead naturally to improved image classification and sufficient 
    understanding to allow indexing of image databases without domain 
    specific constraints.
    
    III. Parallel Processing
    
        The primary objective is to design and develop algorithms, 
    measurement tools, and related software for Parallel Processor 
    platforms. General techniques and software tools for debugging and 
    tuning parallel codes often ignore important points, such as 
    scalability or portability. An opportunity exists for novel solutions 
    that address such pivotal aspects. These can be hitherto untried 
    concepts, or well-designed empirical investigations that shed insight 
    on the demands special to the parallel programming task. Both software 
    and hardware approaches can be used. The publication ``System Software 
    and Tools for High Performance Computing Environments'' (edited by P. 
    Messina and T. Sterling, SIAM, 1993) is a good survey of the issues and 
    problems of interest.
    
    IV. Wireless Communications
    
        This primary objective is to devise, test, and demonstrate adaptive 
    error control strategies for a variety of information types (e.g., 
    speech, image, video) for use in wireless communications. A principal 
    barrier to the realization of the National Information Infrastructure 
    will be in interfacing networks of fundamentally different 
    characteristics while providing uniform, transparent end-to-end 
    service. For example, the wireline technologies being proposed will 
    provide bit transfer rates from 64 Kb/s to over 2 Gb/s, while wireless 
    technologies are expected to be in the range of 10 Kb/s to perhaps 1 
    Mb/s. The strategies for efficient use of network services will be very 
    different for the different technologies used. Central to such 
    strategies are compression and encoding methodologies. For wireless 
    services, compression and encoding have to take into account inherently 
    lower transmission bandwidth and much higher levels of noise and 
    interference than for wireline services. When the services must be 
    transparently interconnected, there must be a way for these networks to 
    adapt to dynamic transmission environments.
        Proposals most compatible with CSL's on-going research in Wireless 
    Communications would target:
    
    --Examining the effects of signal transmission for various source 
    encoding techniques by means of appropriate metrics (e.g., Signal to 
    Noise Ratios (SNR), perceptual differences, and spectral 
    distortions);
    --Identifying critical characteristics of reference source signals 
    that are most influential to receive quality and devising strategies 
    as part of the encoding scheme to protect the critical 
    characteristics of the source signal;
    --Devising precise evaluation methodologies and metrics;
    --Examining characteristics of various transmission technologies 
    (e.g., modulation schemes);
    --Devise strategies for transparent transmission considering 
    information type, network characteristics, physical environment 
    (e.g., noise), and appropriate security/privacy techniques.
    
    V. Collaborative Engineering
    
        The primary objective is to assist industry in applying state-of-
    the-art collaborative engineering technology to engineering and 
    manufacturing applications. This efforts includes research on high 
    performance computing and communication (HPCC) and interconnectivity 
    among heterogeneous systems.
        In real-time collaborative computing environments, a group of 
    individuals need to share an application and objects of this 
    application. In addition, they need to work on the objects to modify 
    them, et. Reliable real-time operations require protocols for 
    application synchronization and command synchronization. For example, 
    transferring mouse movements and keystrokes require that the 
    information gets reliably to all the partners in the right sequence.
        Proposals most compatible with CSL's on-going research in 
    Collaborative Engineering would include research on synchronization of 
    real-time shared applications. For example, the design and development 
    of protocols for applications synchronization (e.g., two CAD 
    applications to be able to work in real-time) and command 
    synchronization (e.g., mouse movements). This work will allow 
    differently configured applications to perform the same actions 
    simultaneously and transparently to the user.
    
    Funding Availability
    
        Approximately $900,000 is available to support cooperative 
    agreements under this program. The number of awards will depend on the 
    quality of the proposals received and the amount of funding requested 
    by the proposals under consideration for award. The Computer Systems 
    laboratory Research Program is limited to innovative ideas generated by 
    the proposal writer on what specific tasks will be performed and how. 
    Any additional years of project funding will be subject to annual 
    competition.
    
    Matching Requirements
    
        There are no matching requirements.
    
    Type of Funding Instrument
    
        Due to the substantial involvement by various divisions of the CSL, 
    cooperative agreements will be awarded. Cooperative agreements will 
    generally involve a close working relationship between CSL and the 
    recipient, and it is expected that the recipient will periodically 
    visit and work at the NIST Gaithersburg, Maryland site with the 
    guidance of NIST scientists.
    
    Eligibility
    
        Eligible applicants under the CSL program is limited to colleges 
    and universities.
    
    Award Period
    
        NIST intends to fund cooperative agreements for a one (1) year 
    period.
    
    Preliminary Screening Process
    
        Applicants must submit an abbreviated proposal prior to submitting 
    a full proposal. The purpose of the abbreviated proposal is to provide 
    applicants with feedback regarding whether the proposed projects are 
    sufficiently promising relative to the selection criteria to warrant 
    preparation of a full proposal. The abbreviated proposal shall include 
    a budget synopsis. The abbreviated proposal is limited in length to no 
    more than 10 pages (8\1/2\ x 11 inch) plus the title page. Forms or 
    certifications for the full proposal shall not be included in the 
    abbreviated proposal. Applicants will be notified in writing whether or 
    not a full submission is invited. Proposals will receive an 
    independent, objective review by a panel composed of at least three 
    persons knowledgeable about the particular scientific area described 
    above that the proposal addresses. Each applicant must submit one 
    signed original and two copies of each proposal.
    
    Full Proposal Review Process
    
        Full proposals are limited in length to no more than 30 pages (8\1/
    2\ x 11 inch) plus the title page. Proposals will receive an 
    independent, objective review by a panel composed of at least three 
    persons knowledgeable about the particular scientific area described 
    above that the proposal addresses. The proposals will be evaluated on a 
    competitive basis. Each applicant must submit one signed original and 
    two copies of each proposal along with Standard Form 424 (Rev 4/92) and 
    other required forms, as referenced under the provisions of OMB 
    Circular A-110.
    
    Application Kit
    
        An application kit, containing all required application forms and 
    certifications is available by calling Trudy Cummings at (301) 975-
    2946. An application kit includes the following:
    
    SF424 (Rev 4/92)--Application for Federal Assistance
    SF424A (Rev 4/92)--Budget Information--Non-Construction Programs
    SF424B (Rev 4/92)--Assurances--Non-Construction Programs
    CD 511 (7/91)--Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and 
    Other Responsibility Matters; Drug-Free Workplace Requirements and 
    Lobbying
    CD 512 (7/91)--Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, 
    Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusions--Lower Tier Covered 
    Transactions and Lobbying
    SF-LLL--Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
    SF-LLL-A--Disclosure of Lobbying Activities Continuation Sheet
    
    Evaluation Criteria
    
        The criteria to be used in evaluating the proposals include 
    technical factors, qualifications of personnel, and reasonability of 
    cost in relation to proposed project scope. Technical factors include: 
    Technical merit of proposal, rationality of approach, compatibility of 
    proposal with needs of targeted area of research, use of new approaches 
    and new methods, and availability of resources. Technical personnel 
    qualifications factors include: Previous technical work with respect to 
    subject area, performance on previous cooperative agreements, grants, 
    or contracts, and academic qualifications with regard to proposed 
    research area (include curriculum vitae and list of publications).
    
    Technical FActors--Total=65%
        --technical merit of proposal: 35%
        --rationality of approach: 10%
        --compatibility of proposal with needs of targeted area of 
    research: 10%
        --use of new approaches and new methods: 5%
        --availability of resources: 5%
    Personal Qualifications--Total=25%
        --previous technical work with respect to subject area: 10%
        --academic qualifications with respect to proposed research 
    area: 19%
        --performance on previous cooperative agreements, grants, or 
    contracts: 5%
    Reasonability of cost with proposed project scope--Total=10%
    
    Selection Procedure
    
        Award recommendations shall be made by the panels based on the 
    scores of the proposals determined in accordance with the evaluation 
    criteria. The chief of each CSL division will make the final award 
    recommendation to the NIST Grants Officer taking into account the score 
    received by the applicant, available funding, and the compatibility of 
    the proposal with the CSL programs. The highest-scored proposals may 
    not necessarily receive award; award is dependent on the compatibility 
    of the proposal with the CSL program.
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        The Standard Form 424 and Standard Form LLL mentioned in this 
    notice are subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act 
    and have been approved by OMB under Control Numbers 0348-0043 and 0348-
    0046.
    
    Primary Application Certification
    
        All primary applicants must submit a completed form CD-511, 
    ``Certifications Regarding Debarment, Suspension and Other 
    Responsibility Matters; Drug-Free Workplace Requirements and 
    Lobbying,'' and the following explanations are hereby provided:
    1. Nonprocurement Debarment and Suspension
        Prospective participants (as defined at 15 CFR Part 26, Section 
    105) are subject to 15 CFR Part 26, ``Nonprocurement Debarment and 
    Suspension'' and the related section of the certification form 
    prescribed above applies;
    2. Drug-Free Workplace
        Grantees (as defined at 15 CFR Part 26, Section 605) are subject to 
    15 CFR Part 26, Subpart F, ``Government wide Requirements for Drug-Free 
    Workplace (Grants)'' and the related section of the certification form 
    prescribed above applies;
    3. Anti-Lobbying
        Persons (as defined at 15 CFR Part 28, Section 105) are subject to 
    the lobbying provisions of the 31 U.S.C. 1352, ``Limitation on use of 
    appropriated funds to influence certain Federal contracting and 
    financial transactions,'' and the lobbying section of the certification 
    form prescribed above applies to applications/bids for grants, 
    cooperative agreements, and contracts for more than $100,000 and loans 
    and loan guarantees for more than $150,000, or the single family 
    maximum mortgage limit for affected programs, whichever is greater; and
    4. Anti-Lobbying Disclosure
        Any applicant that has paid or will pay for lobbying using any 
    funds must submit an SF-LLL, ``Disclosure of Lobbying Activities,'' as 
    required under 15 CFR Part 28, Appendix B.
    5. Lower-Tier Certifications
        Recipients shall require applicants/bidders for subgrants, 
    contracts, subcontracts, or other lower tier covered transactions at 
    any tier under the award to submit, if applicable, a completed Form CD-
    512, ``Certifications Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility 
    and Voluntary Exclusion--Lower Tier Covered Transactions and Lobbying'' 
    and disclosure form, SF-LLL, ``Disclosure of Lobbying Activities.'' 
    Form CD-512 is intended for the use of recipients and should not be 
    transmitted to NIST. SF-LLL submitted by any tier recipient or 
    subrecipient should be submitted to NIST in accordance with the 
    instructions contained in the award document.
    
    Preaward Activities
    
        If applicants incur any costs prior to an award being made, they do 
    so solely at their own risk of not being reimbursed by the Government. 
    Notwithstanding any verbal or written assurance that may have been 
    received, there is no obligation on the part of NIST to cover preaward 
    costs.
    
    No Obligation for Future Funding
    
        If an application is selected for funding, DoC has no obligation to 
    provide any additional future funding in connection with that award. 
    Renewal of an award to increase funding or extend the period of 
    performance is at the total discretion of NIST.
    
    Past Performance
    
        Unsatisfactory performance under prior Federal awards may result in 
    an application not being considered for funding.
    
    Name Check Reviews
    
        All non-profit and for-profit applicants are subject to a name 
    check review process. Name checks are intended to reveal if any key 
    individuals associated with the applicant have been convicted of or are 
    presently facing criminal charges such as fraud, theft, perjury, or 
    other matters which significantly reflect on the applicant's management 
    honesty or financial integrity.
    
    False Statements
    
        A false statement on an application is grounds for denial or 
    termination of funds, and grounds for possible punishment by a fine or 
    imprisonment as provided in 18 U.S.C. 1001.
    
    Buy American-Made Equipment or Products
    
        Applicants are hereby notified that they are encouraged, to the 
    extent feasible, to purchase American-made equipment and products with 
    funding provided under this program in accordance with Congressional 
    intent as set forth in the resolution contained in Public Law 103-121, 
    Sections 602 (a) and (b).
    
    Delinquent Federal Debts
    
        No award of Federal funds shall be made to an applicant who has an 
    outstanding delinquent Federal debt until either:
    
        i. The delinquent account is paid in full,
        ii. A negotiated repayment schedule is established and at least 
    one payment is received, or
        iii. Other arrangements satisfactory to DoC are made.
    
    Indirect Costs
    
        The total dollar amount of the indirect costs proposed in an 
    application under this program must not exceed the indirect cost rate 
    negotiated and approved by a cognizant Federal agency prior to the 
    proposed effective date of the award or 100 percent of the total 
    proposed direct costs dollar amount in the application, whichever is 
    less.
    
    Federal Policies and Procedures
    
        Recipients and subrecipients under the Computer Systems Laboratory 
    Research Program are subject to all Federal Laws and Federal and 
    Departmental policies, regulations, and procedures applicable to 
    Federal financial assistance awards. The Computer Systems Laboratory 
    cooperative agreements program does not directly affect any state or 
    local government. Applications under this program are not subject to 
    Executive Order 12372, ``Intergovernmental Review of Federal 
    Programs.''
    
        Dated: September 8, 1994.
    Samuel Kramer,
    Associate Director.
    [FR Doc. 94-22759 Filed 9-14-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3510-13-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
09/15/1994
Department:
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
94-22759
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: September 15, 1994, Docket No. 940549-4149