95-23001. Record of Decision for the General Management Plan/Final Environmental Impact Statement, Lake Chelan National Recreation Area, Washington  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 179 (Friday, September 15, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 47964-47967]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-23001]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    Record of Decision for the General Management Plan/Final 
    Environmental Impact Statement, Lake Chelan National Recreation Area, 
    Washington
    
    ACTION: Ntoice of Approval of Record Decision.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental 
    Policy Act of 1969 (Public Law 91-190, as amended) and the regulations 
    promulgated by the Council on Environmental Quality in 40 CFR 1505.2, 
    the National Park Service has approved the Record of Decision for the 
    General Management Plan/Final Environmental Impact Statement for Lake 
    Chelan National Recreation Area, Washington. The National Park Service 
    will implement the proposed action as described in the Final Impact 
    Statement.
    
    DATES: The Record of Decision was recommended by the Superintendent of 
    North Cascades National Park Service Complex, concurred by the Deputy 
    Field Director, Pacific West Area, and approved by the Field Director, 
    Pacific West Area, on August 30, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Inquiries regarding the Record of Decision or the 
    Environmental Impact Statement should be submitted to the 
    Superintendent, North Cascades National Park Service Complex, 2105 
    Highway 20, Sedro Woolley, WA 98284-9314; telephone: (360) 856-5700.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of the Record of Decision follows: 
    The Department of the Interior, National Park Service, has prepared 
    this Record of Decision on the Final Environmental Impact Statement 
    (EIS) for the General Management Plan for Lake Chelan National 
    Recreation Area, Washington. This Record of Decision is a statement of 
    the decision made, the background of the project, other alternatives 
    considered, the basis for the decision, the environmentally preferable 
    alternative, measures to minimize environmental harm, and public 
    involvement in the decision making process.
    
    Decision (Selected Action)
    
        The National Park Service will implement the proposed action as 
    described in the Final Environmental Impact Statement.
        The National Park Service will manage visitor and resident use of 
    the recreation area's resources in order to preserve the natural, 
    scenic and cultural values of the area. The rustic setting of Lake 
    Chelan National Recreation Area will be part of the transition from the 
    downlake, primarily recreational and residential setting, to the wild 
    and natural North Cascades National Park.
        The National Park Service will not manipulate the Stehekin river or 
    its tributaries except to protect public roads and bridges. Woody 
    debris could be trimmed or turned in the lower 9 miles of the Stehekin 
    River to allow safer recreational use of the river for rafting, 
    kayaking, and canoeing if it did not alter the function or stability of 
    woody debris accumulations and was permitted by the appropriate 
    regulatory agency. The Park Service will not remove woody debris from 
    the river system except to protect public roads and bridges. The Park 
    Service will discourage private landowners from manipulating the 
    Stehekin River or removing woody debris. The active sand, rock, and 
    gravel borrow pit will be maintained at less than or equal to its 
    current size; no new borrow pits will be opened, and abandoned borrow 
    pits will be restored. Gravel will be sold to the public at fair market 
    value, with restrictions.
        Fire suppression, prescribed natural fire, management-ignited 
    prescribed fire, and selective manual fuel reductions will be used to 
    improve wildland fire protection for human life and property and to 
    manage for late-succession stage in ponderosa pine/Douglas fir forest. 
    The practice of woodlot cutting for firewood will be phased out. When 
    available, firewood will be provided from administrative sources, at 
    fair market value.
        The Golden West Lodge and the High Bridge Historic District will be 
    rehabilitated and the Buckner homestead and orchard will be preserved. 
    The airstrip will be operated under a special use permit with the 
    Washington State Department of Transportation for private, 
    noncommercial use. Some NPS and concession housing, maintenance, and 
    related facilities will be consolidated beside the airstrip.
    
    [[Page 47965]]
    
        The Stehekin Valley road between the Landing and Harlequin Bridge 
    will remain a two-lane paved road; from Harlequin Bridge to 9-Mile, it 
    will become a single-lane, paved road with pullouts; from 9-Mile to 
    High Bridge, a single-lane, gravel road; and from High Bridge to 
    Cottonwood, a high-clearance, shuttle vehicle road. Unconstrained 
    private vehicle use will end at High Bridge. Private vehicle use from 
    High Bridge to Bridge Creek will be allowed, but traffic flow will be 
    regulated. Public shuttle service will be provided from the Landing to 
    Cottonwood. Only the public shuttle service, hikers, horses, and 
    bicycles will be allowed from Bridge Creek to Cottonwood. Company Creek 
    road will be maintained in its current alignment, and will be protected 
    from river erosion at two locations. Stehekin Landing will be 
    redesigned to improve visitor flow and parking, and to relocate lodging 
    and other facilities away from geohazards. The current capacity of 
    concession services for food and lodging will increase somewhat.
        Land protection will emphasize high flood influence areas, 
    wetlands, riparian areas, and high visual sensitivity areas.
    
    Background of the Project
    
        Preparation of the EIS was required by a consent decree entered in 
    U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington, on April 22, 1991. 
    The consent decree specified actions for resolving the dispute between 
    the plaintiff, North Cascades Conservation Council, and defendants in 
    the U.S. Department of the Interior. The consent decree resulted from a 
    law suit filed by the North Cascades Conservation Council (Civil Case 
    No. C-89-1342D). This Record of Decision is the last necessary action 
    under the National Environmental Policy Act regulations regarding the 
    consent decree.
    Other Alternatives Considered
    
        Four other alternatives to the selected action were considered. 
    Under the no action alternative, the recreation area would be a rural 
    resort community where resources are used, within limits, by an 
    expanding residential presence. This alternative was the 1988 General 
    Management Plan and supporting implementation plans.
        Under alternative A, the area would be a wild, natural area where 
    resources and natural processes would be largely undisturbed; natural 
    forces would be allowed to slowly remove evidence of human occupation. 
    The Stehekin River would not be manipulated, mining gravel would not be 
    allowed, prescribed fire would be used to manage wildland fire risk, 
    select cultural properties would be protected, the airstrip closed, and 
    all roads restored to natural conditions as private property was 
    acquired.
        Under alternative B, the area would be a rural, woodland gateway to 
    the North Cascades; use of resources by visitors and residents would be 
    limited in order to preserve natural, scenic, and cultural values. Some 
    river manipulation would be allowed, mining gravel would not be 
    allowed, wildland fire protection and cultural resource management 
    would be similar to the selected action, the airstrip closed, and roads 
    would be similar in character to existing conditions.
        Under alternative C, the area would be a retreat/refuge/resort 
    where resources and natural processes are showcased for the enjoyment 
    of visitors. All existing public and private improvements would be 
    protected from river erosion, gravel mining would be maintained and 
    expanded if necessary, wildland fire protection would be augmented 
    using selective manual thinning, all cultural properties would be 
    rehabilitated or preserved, the airstrip used for emergency landings 
    only, and roads would be similar in character to existing conditions.
    
    Basis for Decision
    
        As presented in the final EIS, the National Park Service's 
    management objectives are numerous. Twenty seven individual objectives 
    are identified, from natural resource management to land use and 
    development. After evaluation of public comments on the alternatives 
    presented in the draft EIS, the selected action best balances the 
    statutory mission of the National Park Service to provide long term 
    resource preservation while allowing for appropriate levels of visitor 
    use and appropriate means of visitor enjoyment. The selected action 
    provides for projected growth in visitation through the year 2007, 
    while complying with provisions of law under the Endangered Species 
    Act, National Historic Preservation Act, and Wilderness Act; policies 
    of the National Park Service; the recreation area's purpose based on 
    its enabling legislation; constraints imposed on the area's management 
    under the same legislation; and the protection of its significant 
    resources.
    
    Environmentally Preferable Alternative
    
        A Record of Decision must identify the environmentally preferable 
    alternative, which is that alternative which causes the least damage to 
    the biological environment, and that best protects, preserves, and 
    enhances resources. With its emphasis on preservation of the natural 
    ecosystem of the valley, alternative A is the environmentally 
    preferable alternative.
    
    Measures to Minimize Environmental Harm
    
        All practicable measures to avoid or minimize environmental impacts 
    that could result from implementation of the selected action have been 
    identified and incorporated into the selected action. These include 
    protection of high flood influence areas, wetlands, riparian areas, and 
    high visual sensitivity areas; protection of threatened, endangered and 
    rare species; protection of properties eligible for listing on the 
    National Register of Historic Places; and the restoration of wetlands, 
    disturbed sites in the river corridor, abandoned gravel pits, woodlots, 
    old fairways, and road segments. The NPS would not manipulate natural 
    river dynamics except, under certain conditions, to protect roads and 
    bridges.
        Additional mitigating measures are identified in the implementation 
    plans associated with the EIS. The implementation plans completed or 
    amended in this EIS are the Sand, Rock, and Gravel Plan; Forest Fuel 
    Reduction / Firewood Management Plan; Wilderness Management Plan; 
    Transportation Plan; Stehekin Landing and Valley Development Concept 
    Plans; and the Land Protection Plan. The environmental impacts of these 
    plans were presented in the final EIS, by impact topic, on pages 274 
    through 315. Impacts from these plans are incorporated into the impact 
    analysis sections for each of the 13 impact topics. A range of 
    management options for each of the implementation plans was integrated 
    into each of the five alternatives considered in the EIS.
        Mitigating and monitoring measures in the implementation plan 
    follow.
        Sand, Rock, and Gravel Plan: mining will only occur at the Company 
    Creek borrow pit; this pit will be reclaimed as new mining occurs; 
    sand, rock, and gravel will be conserved and recycled whenever 
    possible; except for emergencies, the use of sand, rock, and gravel 
    from the Company Creek pit will be limited to 1400 cubic yards per 
    year--1200 cubic yards for NPS use and 200 cubic yards for private use; 
    material beyond this limit or for new construction will be imported; 
    material will be used only for maintenance activities listed in the 
    plan; the reclaimed portions of the pit will be topsoiled, fertilized, 
    seeded, and planted with plant stocks indigenous to Stehekin; the 
    working face of the pit will be temporarily covered with native 
    grasses; the pit will be monitored before, 
    
    [[Page 47966]]
    during, and after active mining operations to identify sensitive 
    resources, to ensure that operations minimize impacts, and to see that 
    reclamation goals are met; the Rainbow Creek gravel pit will be 
    actively reclaimed including topographic restoration, surface erosion 
    control, nonnative species control, soil building, revegetation, plant 
    irrigation, and monitoring; continued natural recovery at all other 
    abandoned pits will be monitored.
        Forest Fuel Reduction/Firewood Management Plan: data from forest 
    stand examinations in the forest fuel reduction areas, and in control 
    plots, will be used as baseline information for monitoring forest 
    changes through time; thirteen attributes, as identified in the plan, 
    will be monitored using the NPS's Fire Monitoring Handbook in order to 
    document the effects of manual thinning and firewood administration 
    activities; except for two transitional woodcutter areas, no 
    woodcutting or manual thinning will occur within any forest fuel 
    reduction area until monitoring plots are established and measured; 
    program effectiveness will be reviewed every five years; during 
    woodcutting, soil compaction will be minimized by limiting skid trails, 
    not allowing vehicle access by woodcutters, and hand raking tire/track 
    ruts; stumps will be flush-cut and slash placed over them; the existing 
    harvested woodlots, and associated access roads, will be rehabilitated; 
    the Stehekin Landing, after mistletoe control and hazard fuel reduction 
    work, will also be rehabilitated; as manual thinning is completed, old 
    roads and log decks will be closed and rehabilitated including eight 
    old road segments; revegetation will include mechanical ripping and 
    recontouring soil, adding mulch, and scattering native plant seeds, 
    litter, and coarse woody debris; if significant revegetation is not 
    observed within five years, native seedlings may be planted.
        Wilderness Management Plan: the maximum backcountry party size in 
    the NRA is six pairs of eyes (human or stock) in crosscountry areas, 
    and 12 pairs of eyes otherwise; the existing commercial stock user may 
    exceed this limit at historic levels (up to 30 pairs of eyes, four to 
    six times per year); no oversized parties are allowed at Juanita Lake 
    camp (12 pairs of eyes maximum); open campfires and gathering firewood 
    in subalpine zones (and some other sensitive areas) is prohibited; 
    grazing in the NRA is permitted only at three areas currently used--
    Rainbow Meadow, Hidden Lake, and Juanita Lake basin; grazing is 
    prohibited within 0.25 mile of Juanita Lake; all grazing will be 
    regulated by monitoring soil moisture conditions, and will be 
    restricted to the dry period of the summer which generally begins about 
    July 15th; otherwise, only certified, weed-free, processed feed is 
    allowed.
        Transportation Plan: between Harlequin Bridge and 9-Mile, the road 
    will be paved and reduced to a single-lane (12-14 feet wide) with 
    pullouts; the sides of gravel roads that have become excessively wide 
    will be rehabilitated; unconstrained private vehicle use will end at 
    High Bridge; private vehicle use from High Bridge to Bridge Creek will 
    be regulated by season an/or hour of day; only the public shuttle 
    service, hikers, horses, and bicycles will be allowed to use the road 
    from Bridge Creek to Cottonwood; the road from High Bridge to 
    Cottonwood will be maintained to sustain heavy-duty, high-clearance 
    shuttle vehicles; erosion control systems along the upper Company Creek 
    road will be removed and replaced, designed to keep the road from 
    eroding during frequently recurring flood events (i.e., 10- to 25-year 
    recurrence interval), and will be made from rock, soil, and native 
    vegetation; public roads will be protected in active river erosion 
    zones only if (1) there are no feasible alternatives, (2) funds are 
    available, (3) the actions will have less impacts than other 
    alternatives, and (4) the action are permitted by county, state, and 
    other federal agencies; snowmobile use will be limited to existing 
    roads below High Bridge; the airstrip will be retained and operated 
    under a special use permit for noncommercial public use on a ``use at 
    your own risk'' basis; the Washington State Department of 
    Transportation, Aeronautics Division (the Division) will keep the 
    airstrip and approaches equipped and maintained in accordance with 
    requirements for state-operated emergency airstrips; there will be no 
    expansion of the permitted area beyond that identified in the current 
    permit; camping will not be permitted within the permit area; the 
    Division will be required to prepare a plan and conduct noxious weed 
    control measures within the area under permit, as approved by the NPS; 
    an annual maintenance and operating plan will be prepared by the 
    Division and submitted for review and approval by the NPS.
        Stehekin Landing and Valley Development Concept Plan: the ``outpost 
    community'' image of the area will be encouraged using the 
    Architectural Character Guidelines; the Golden West Lodge and High 
    Bridge Historic District will be rehabilitated following the Secretary 
    of the Interior Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties; the 
    Buckner homestead and orchard will be preserved, and items associated 
    with the farming operation will be restored on a priority basis, if 
    owned by the NPS; the genetic stock of the Buckner orchard will be 
    maintained; the natural character of public lands within 200 feet of 
    the lake and river shoreline will be restored; NPS structures will be 
    removed from the shoreline, where appropriate, and no new NPS 
    structures will be constructed on the shoreline; the ``fairways'' will 
    be restored to natural conditions as appropriate; all abandoned 
    vehicles will be removed from public lands; unnecessary powerlines will 
    be removed and all others will be buried where appropriate, especially 
    in areas with high visitor use; some campsites at Weaver Point 
    Campground will be moved back from the shoreline; at the Landing, as 
    the useful lives of existing structures are approached, new lodging 
    facilities, grocery, and post office will be built away from 
    geohazards, and existing facilities will be demolished and their sites 
    restored; the current NPS headquarters building will be removed; the 
    NPS will provide boat sewage disposal at no cost; visitors will be 
    encouraged to use nonmotorized transportation through rental services.
        Land Protection Plan: incompatible uses of private property are (1) 
    any subdivision of land that was not in effect prior to this Record of 
    Decision, except as permitted through the Chelan County Subdivision 
    Regulations and as consistent with Chelan County health standards, (2) 
    the siting or construction of any building in an identified high flood 
    influence area, wetland, riparian area, or highly unstable area, e.g., 
    slopes greater than 20%, where potential impacts cannot be confined to 
    the specific private ownership, (3) any dredging or filing of Lake 
    Chelan or the Stehekin River without full compliance with the U.S. Army 
    Corps of Engineers permitting process and/or appropriate authorization 
    from the state, (4) the cutting of timber for sale or transport outside 
    the Stehekin valley, (5) the cutting of timber by any means other than 
    selective tree harvesting except as required by Washington State 
    Department of Natural Resources regulations, and (6) the mining of 
    sand, rock, or gravel for sale or transport outside the Stehekin 
    valley; the NPS will not site any new building or structure in (1) the 
    100-year floodplain, unless used for nonhuman occupancy and with 
    conditions on specific uses or mitigation, (2) wetland soils, and those 
    soils not conducive to building foundations, leachfield percolation, or 
    
    
    [[Page 47967]]
    site drainage, (3) geohazard areas, (4) areas with slopes greater than 
    20% and (5) areas of high visual sensitivity, except where specific 
    design mitigation can successfully be used; ensure that applicable laws 
    and policies of the state of Washington are followed, including health 
    and safety regulations and Washington Growth Management Act provisions; 
    continue willing buyer/willing seller acquisitions for properties with 
    areas that have a high priority for resource protection, or for which 
    public needs have been identified; emphasize opportunities for easement 
    purchases and other less-than-fee interests for resource protection and 
    public use.
        The conclusion on impacts to the northern spotted owl in the final 
    EIS is modified by this Record of Decision. After formal consultation 
    with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), it is the biological 
    opinion of the FWS that the impacts from the General Management Plan 
    for Lake Chelan NRA are not likely to jeopardize the continued 
    existence of the threatened northern spotted owl. Incidental take of 
    one pair of spotted owls or resident single owl is anticipated. The FWS 
    concurs with the NPS determinations that the General Management Plan 
    for Lake Chelan NRA will have ``no effect'' on the bald eagle and 
    peregrine falcon and will ``beneficially affect'' the gray wolf, and 
    ``may affect,'' but will ``not likely'' ``adversely affect,'' the 
    grizzly bear.
    
    Public Involvement
    
        Public comment has been requested, considered and incorporated into 
    the planning process during four major planning stages, and has also 
    been considered in numerous other ways. Initial public scoping meetings 
    were held in June 1991, in Stehekin, Chelan and Seattle. Public comment 
    was again requested on the primary data set used in planning in April 
    1933; in a preliminary alternatives document distributed in May 1993; 
    and in public hearings on the draft EIS in October 1994. Additionally, 
    four newsletters were distributed during the planning process, 
    including an extensive data summary booklet. Consultation was also 
    completed with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Advisory Council 
    on Historic Preservation, the Washington State Historic Preservation 
    Office, and Native American tribes.
        About 750 copies of the draft EIS were distributed. Written 
    comments were accepted for 60 days, and over 1000 comment letters or 
    testimonies were recorded. Responses to substantive comments on the 
    draft EIS were published in Volume II of the final EIS, distributed in 
    July 1995. All substantive comments were addressed by either providing 
    clarification of information, modifying the test, or directly 
    responding in the final EIS.
    
        Dated: September 7, 1995.
    Rory D. Westberg,
    Acting Deputy Field Director, Pacific West Area, National Park Service.
    [FR Doc. 95-23001 Filed 9-14-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
09/15/1995
Department:
Interior Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Ntoice of Approval of Record Decision.
Document Number:
95-23001
Dates:
The Record of Decision was recommended by the Superintendent of North Cascades National Park Service Complex, concurred by the Deputy Field Director, Pacific West Area, and approved by the Field Director, Pacific West Area, on August 30, 1995.
Pages:
47964-47967 (4 pages)
PDF File:
95-23001.pdf