98-24773. Notice of Amendment of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Stainless Steel Wire Rod From Korea  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 178 (Tuesday, September 15, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 49331-49332]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-24773]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    
    International Trade Administration
    [A-580-829]
    
    
    Notice of Amendment of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than 
    Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Stainless Steel Wire Rod From 
    Korea
    
    AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
    Department of Commerce.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: September 15, 1998.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank Thomson, Import Administration, 
    International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
    Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 
    (202) 482-4793.
    
    The Applicable Statute
    
        Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the Tariff Act of 
    1930, as amended (the Act), are references to the provisions effective 
    January 1, 1995, the effective date of the amendments made to the Act 
    by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA). In addition, unless 
    otherwise indicated, all citations to the Department of Commerce's 
    (Department's) regulations are to the regulations at 19 CFR part 351, 
    62 FR 27296 (May 19, 1997).
    
    Amendment to the Final Determination
    
        On July 20, 1998, in accordance with section 735(a) of the Act, the 
    Department made a final determination that stainless steel wire rod 
    (SSWR) from Korea is being, or likely to be, sold in the United States 
    at less than fair value. See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at 
    Less Than Fair Value: Stainless Steel Wire Rod from Korea, 63 FR 40404 
    (July 29, 1998) (final determination). On July 27 and 30, 1998, 
    Dongbang Special Steel Co. Ltd. (Dongbang)/Changwon Specialty Steel Co. 
    Ltd. (Changwon)/Pohang Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. (POSCO) (collectively, 
    respondent) and petitioners (AL Tech Specialty Steel Corp., Carpenter 
    Technology Corp., Republic Engineered Steels, Talley Metals Technology, 
    Inc., and the United Steel Workers of America, AFL-CIO/CLC), 
    respectively, filed timely allegations that the Department had made 
    ministerial errors in its final determination. The respondent's 
    allegation asserts that the Department did not incorporate necessary 
    adjustments to the cost of materials figures utilized on the sales tape 
    (i.e., the variable cost of manufacture field). Respondent alleges that 
    the Department's failure to adjust the cost of materials resulted in 
    incorrect difference in merchandise (DIFMER) adjustments on the sales 
    file. The respondent notes that the Department correctly made the 
    necessary adjustments to the cost of materials figures in the cost 
    files. As a result, the respondent claims that the DIFMER adjustment 
    utilized by the Department in the final determination does not 
    accurately reflect the costs as adjusted by the Department. To correct 
    this alleged error, the respondent suggests that the Department 
    recalculate the materials, labor, and variable overhead figures (both 
    for home market and the U.S. market) used to derive the DIFMER 
    adjustment for both Dongbang and Changwon's calculations. For 
    Dongbang's home market and U.S. variable cost of manufacturing 
    calculation, the respondent claims the Department should include 
    Dongbang's cost of materials less the fixed cost portions, POSCO's cost 
    of materials, and POSCO's general and administrative expenses. For 
    Changwon's home market and U.S. variable cost of manufacturing 
    calculation, the respondent asserts that the Department should include 
    Changwon's cost of materials less the fixed cost portions, and POSCO's 
    cost of production, which includes POSCO's general and administrative 
    expenses.
        Petitioners' July 30, 1998, submission addressed the respondent's 
    ministerial error allegation and contained one additional ministerial 
    error allegation. Petitioners agreed with the respondent that an error 
    occurred in the calculation of the DIFMER adjustment. However, in 
    addition to the respondent's proposed solution, petitioners also claim 
    that for Dongbang's variable cost of manufacture calculation, the 
    Department should also add POSCO's interest expense for both the home 
    and U.S. market calculations. Petitioners also allege that the 
    Department inadvertently used an incorrect home market diameter 
    variable when conducting the product concordance.
        On August 4, 1998, the respondent filed comments addressing 
    petitioners' ministerial error allegations. The respondent agrees with 
    petitioners' proposed changes regarding Dongbang and Changwon's 
    variable cost of manufacturing calculations, with one exception. The 
    respondent asserts that the Department should not include
    
    [[Page 49332]]
    
    POSCO's interest expense field in these calculations because these 
    financing costs are not considered a component of variable cost of 
    manufacturing.
        We have determined, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224, that a 
    ministerial error (as alleged by petitioners) was made regarding the 
    product concordance program in the final determination.
        However, we have also determined that the nature of the 
    respondent's alleged error concerning the calculation of Dongbang and 
    Changwon's variable cost of manufacturing calculations in the 
    respondent's sales data base is methodological, rather than ministerial 
    as defined above, and the allegation does not address an unintentional 
    decision by the Department. Accordingly, we have not made any revisions 
    with regard to this alleged error.
        Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(e), we are amending 
    the final determination of the antidumping duty investigation of 
    stainless steel wire rod from Korea. The revised weighted-average 
    dumping margins are in the ``Antidumping Order'' section below.
    
    Scope of Order
    
        For purposes of this investigation, SSWR comprises products that 
    are hot-rolled or hot-rolled annealed and/or pickled and/or descaled 
    rounds, squares, octagons, hexagons or other shapes, in coils, that may 
    also be coated with a lubricant containing copper, lime or oxalate. 
    SSWR is made of alloy steels containing, by weight, 1.2 percent or less 
    of carbon and 10.5 percent or more of chromium, with or without other 
    elements. These products are manufactured only by hot-rolling or hot-
    rolling, annealing, and/or pickling and/or descaling, are normally sold 
    in coiled form, and are of solid cross-section. The majority of SSWR 
    sold in the United States is round in cross-sectional shape, annealed 
    and pickled, and later cold-finished into stainless steel wire or 
    small-diameter bar.
        The most common size for such products is 5.5 millimeters or 0.217 
    inches in diameter, which represents the smallest size that normally is 
    produced on a rolling mill and is the size that most wire-drawing 
    machines are set up to draw. The range of SSWR sizes normally sold in 
    the United States is between 0.20 inches and 1.312 inches diameter. Two 
    stainless steel grades, SF20T and K-M35FL, are excluded from the scope 
    of the investigation. The chemical makeup for the excluded grades is as 
    follows:
    
    SF20T
    
    Carbon--0.05 max
    Manganese--2.00 max
    Phosphorous--0.05 max
    Sulfur--0.15 max
    Silicon--1.00 max
    Chromium--19.00/21.00
    Molybdenum--1.50/2.50
    Lead--added (0.10/0.30)
    Tellurium--added (0.03 min)
    
    K-M35FL
    
    Carbon--0.015 max
    Silicon--0.70/1.00
    Manganese--0.40 max
    Phosphorous--0.04 max
    Sulfur--0.03 max
    Nickel--0.30 max
    Chromium--12.50/14.00
    Lead--0.10/0.30
    Aluminum--0.20/0.35
        The products subject to this order are currently classifiable under 
    subheadings 7221.00.0005, 7221.00.0015, 7221.00.0030, 7221.00.0045, and 
    7221.00.0075 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
    (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience 
    and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise is 
    dispositive.
    
    Antidumping Order
    
        On September 8, 1998, in accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, 
    the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) notified the Department 
    that a U.S. industry is materially injured by reason of imports of 
    stainless steel wire rod from Korea, pursuant to section 735(b)(1)(A) 
    of the Act. Therefore, in accordance with section 736(a)(1) of the Act, 
    the Department will direct the United States Customs Service to assess, 
    upon further advice by the Department, antidumping duties equal to the 
    amount by which the normal value of the merchandise exceeds the export 
    price of the merchandise for all relevant entries of stainless steel 
    wire rod from Korea. These antidumping duties will be assessed on all 
    unliquidated entries of stainless steel wire rod from Korea entered, or 
    withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after March 5, 1998, 
    the date on which the Department published its preliminary 
    determination notice in the Federal Register (63 FR 10825).
        On or after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal 
    Register, U.S. customs officers must require, at the same time as 
    importers would normally deposit estimated duties, the cash deposits 
    listed below for the subject merchandise. The ``All Others'' rate 
    applies to all exporters of stainless steel wire rod not specifically 
    listed below.
        The revised final weight-averaged margins are as follows:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Original     Revised 
                                                         final       final  
             Manufacturer/producer/exporter             margin      margin  
                                                      percentage  percentage
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Dongbang Special Steel Co., Ltd./Changwon                               
     Specialty Steel Co., Ltd./Pohang Iron and Steel                        
     Co., Ltd.......................................       3.18        5.19 
    Sammi Steel Co., Ltd............................      28.44       28.44 
    All Others......................................       3.18        5.19 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        This notice constitutes the antidumping duty order with respect to 
    stainless steel wire rod from Korea, pursuant to section 736(a) of the 
    Act. Interested parties may contact the Central Records Unit, Room B-
    099 of the Main Commerce Building, for copies of an updated list of 
    antidumping duty orders currently in effect.
        This order is published in accordance with section 736(a) of the 
    Act and 19 CFR Sec. 351.211.
    
        Dated: September 10, 1998.
    Richard W. Moreland,
    Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
    [FR Doc. 98-24773 Filed 9-14-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
9/15/1998
Published:
09/15/1998
Department:
International Trade Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-24773
Dates:
September 15, 1998.
Pages:
49331-49332 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
A-580-829
PDF File:
98-24773.pdf