[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 15, 1999)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 50036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-23915]
[[Page 50036]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 51
[FRL-6437-4]
Notice of Proposed Rule Revisions to Emissions Budgets Set Forth
in EPA's Finding of Significant Contribution and Rulemaking for
Purposes of Reducing Regional Transport of Ozone for the States of
Connecticut, Massachusetts and Rhode Island
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On October 27, 1998, EPA published a final action requiring 22
States and the District of Columbia to submit State implementation plan
(SIP) revisions to prohibit specified amounts of emissions of oxides of
nitrogen (NOX)--one of the precursors to ozone (smog)
pollution--for the purpose of reducing NOX and ozone
transport across State boundaries in the eastern half of the United
States. This action is referred to as the NOX SIP Call.
Subsequent to that rulemaking, three States, Connecticut,
Massachusetts and Rhode Island, approached EPA with concerns about the
distribution of the emission reduction requirements to the three
States. While the States agreed that the amount of the overall emission
reductions that EPA was requiring from the three State region was
appropriate, the States had concerns about the specific emission
reductions that EPA was requiring from each of the three individual
States. In particular, the States were concerned that the emission
reduction requirements were inconsistent with the emission reductions
that those States were requiring in connection with an existing multi-
state effort to reduce NOX and ozone transport across State
boundaries in the northeastern portion of the United States.
In response to these concerns, EPA and the States of Connecticut,
Massachusetts and Rhode Island signed a memorandum of understanding
(MOU) in February 1999. This MOU required EPA to take action to
redistribute the NOX emission reduction requirements among
the three States. With this rule EPA is proposing to redistribute the
total combined electricity generating stationary source (EGU) budget
for the three States.
Subsequent to the signing of the MOU, EPA took a final action that
changed the EGU portion of the budgets for the three States in a
Technical Amendment to the NOX SIP Call published on May 14,
1999. EPA is now proposing action to redistribute the States' budgets.
The redistribution that EPA is proposing is slightly different than the
redistribution stated in the MOU to reflect and remain consistent with
the May 14, 1999 changes to the budgets.
DATES: Comments: Written comments must be received by October 5, 1999.
ADDRESSES: Any written comments must be identified with Docket No. A-
99-13, must be identified as comments on the direct final rule and
companion proposal and must be submitted in duplicate to: EPA Air
Docket (6102), Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, S.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20460. The docket is available for public inspection
and copying between 8:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, at
the address given above. A reasonable fee may be charged for copying.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathryn Petrillo, Acid Rain Division
(6204J) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street SW,
Washington DC 20460, telephone number (202) 564-9093; e-mail:
petrillo.kathryn@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA is proposing to redistribute the EGU
portions of the Connecticut, Massachusetts and Rhode Island
NOX Budgets in accordance with the Memorandum of
Understanding that was signed by the three States and EPA in February
1999. In a direct final action that is located in the ``Rules and
Regulations'' section of today's Federal Register, we are promulgating
the revisions to the State budgets of Connecticut, Massachusetts and
Rhode Island without prior proposal because we view the revisions as
noncontroversial and anticipate no adverse comment. We have explained
our reasons for this action in the preamble to the direct final rule.
If we receive no timely adverse comment, we will not take further
action on this proposed rule. If we receive timely adverse comment, we
will withdraw the direct final rule, and the direct final rule will not
take effect.
We will then address all public comments in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed rule. We will not institute a second comment
period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so
at this time. For further information, please see the information
provided in the direct final action that is located in the ``Rules and
Regulations'' section of today's Federal Register.
Dated: September 7, 1999.
Carol M. Browner,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 99-23915 Filed 9-14-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P