96-23709. Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9, DC-9-80 and C-9 (Military) Series Airplanes, and Model MD-88 Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 181 (Tuesday, September 17, 1996)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 48864-48866]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-23709]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 96-NM-99-AD]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9, DC-9-80 
    and C-9 (Military) Series Airplanes, and Model MD-88 Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to certain McDonnell Douglas Model 
    DC-9, DC-9-80 and C-9 (military) series airplanes, and Model MD-88 
    airplanes. This proposal would require either installation of external 
    protective doublers between the outboard flight spoiler actuators and 
    the aft spar webs of the wings, or replacement of the pistons of the 
    outboard flight spoiler actuators with improved pistons. This proposal 
    is prompted by reports of failure of the piston of the outboard flight 
    spoiler actuator due to fatigue at the clevis end of the upper lug 
    mounting hole of the piston. The actions specified by the proposed AD 
    are intended to prevent such failure of the piston and the consequent 
    puncturing of the aft spar web. This condition, if not corrected, could 
    result in fuel leakage and reduced structural integrity of the wings.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by October 28, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-103, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 96-NM-99-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this
    
    [[Page 48865]]
    
    location between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
    Federal holidays.
        The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be 
    obtained from McDonnell Douglas Corporation, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, 
    Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Technical Publications 
    Business Administration, Department C1-L51 (2-60). This information may 
    be examined at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind 
    Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Transport Airplane 
    Directorate, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount 
    Boulevard, Lakewood, California.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brent Bandley, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification 
    Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712; telephone 
    (310) 627-5237; fax (310) 627-5210.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with 
    the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 96-NM-99-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-103, Attention: Rules 
    Docket No. 96-NM-99-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 
    98055-4056.
    
    Discussion
    
        The FAA has received reports indicating that the pistons of the 
    outboard flight spoiler actuators on the left and right wings of 
    McDonnell Douglas Model DC-9, DC-9-80, or MD-88 series airplanes 
    failed. Investigation revealed that fatigue of the clevis end of the 
    upper lug mounting hole on the piston caused the pistons to fail. Such 
    failure can result in the failed piston puncturing the aft spar web of 
    the wing. This condition, if not corrected, could result in fuel 
    leakage and reduced structural integrity of the wings.
    
    Explanation of Relevant Service Information
    
        The FAA has reviewed and approved McDonnell Douglas Service 
    Bulletin DC9-27-300, Revision 02, dated June 29, 1995, which describes 
    procedures for installation of an external protective doubler between 
    the aft spar web and the piston of the outboard flight spoiler actuator 
    on the wings; and procedures for replacement of the pistons of outboard 
    flight spoiler actuators with improved pistons of higher strength. 
    Installing a protective doubler or replacing the spoiler actuator 
    piston will minimize the possibility of a failed piston puncturing a 
    fuel tank and reducing the structural integrity of the wing.
    
    Explanation of Requirements of Proposed Rule
    
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other products of this same type design, the 
    proposed AD would require either installation of external protective 
    doublers between the aft spar webs and the pistons of the outboard 
    flight spoiler actuators on the wings, or replacement of the pistons of 
    the outboard flight spoiler actuators with improved pistons. The 
    actions would be required to be accomplished in accordance with the 
    service bulletin described previously.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        There are approximately 1,571 Model DC-9, DC-9-80, and C-9 
    (military) series airplanes, and Model MD-88 airplanes of the affected 
    design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 1,047 airplanes 
    of U.S. registry would be affected by this proposed AD.
        The proposed installation of external doublers would take 
    approximately 14 work hours per airplane to accomplish, at an average 
    labor rate of $60 per work hour. Required parts would cost 
    approximately $1,500 per airplane. Based on these figures, the cost 
    impact of the installation of external doublers proposed by this AD on 
    U.S. operators is estimated to be $2,340 per airplane.
        The proposed replacement of the pistons of the outboard flight 
    spoiler actuators would take approximately 12 work hours per airplane 
    to accomplish, at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour. Required 
    parts would cost approximately $5,180 per airplane. Based on these 
    figures, the cost impact of the replaced of the pistons proposed by 
    this AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $5,900 per airplane.
        These cost impact figures are based on assumptions that no operator 
    has yet accomplished any of the proposed requirements of this AD 
    action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the 
    future if this AD were not adopted.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed 
    regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
    Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT 
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 
    and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, 
    positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under 
    the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft 
    regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the 
    Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules 
    Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    [[Page 48866]]
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    McDonnell Douglas: Docket 96-NM-99-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model DC-9, Model DC-9-80 and C-9 (military) 
    series airplanes, and Model MD-88 airplanes; as listed in McDonnell 
    Douglas Service Bulletin DC9-27-300, Revision 02, dated June 29, 
    1995; certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent fuel leakage and reduced structural integrity of the 
    wings due to puncturing of the wings by a failed piston of the 
    outboard flight spoiler actuator, accomplish the following:
        (a) Prior to the accumulation of 5,000 landings after the 
    effective date of this AD, accomplish the actions specified in 
    either paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this AD, in accordance with 
    McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin DC9-27-300, Revision 02, dated 
    June 29, 1995.
    
        Note 2: Installation of McDonnell Douglas flight spoiler 
    actuator assembly, part number (P/N) 5915900-5525, on the right and 
    left wings prior to the effective date of this AD is considered 
    acceptable for compliance with the requirements of this paragraph.
        (1) Install external protective doublers between the outboard 
    flight spoiler actuators and the aft spar webs of the left and right 
    wings; or
        (2) Replace the pistons of the outboard flight spoiler actuators 
    on the left and right wings with improved pistons,
        (b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification 
    Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall 
    submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal 
    Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, Los Angeles ACO.
    
        Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Los Angeles ACO.
    
        (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 10, 1996.
    James V. Devany,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 96-23709 Filed 9-16-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
09/17/1996
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
96-23709
Dates:
Comments must be received by October 28, 1996.
Pages:
48864-48866 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 96-NM-99-AD
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
96-23709.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13