99-24039. National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; National Priorities List  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 180 (Friday, September 17, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 50457-50459]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-24039]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Part 300
    
    [FRL-6438-7]
    
    
    National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; 
    National Priorities List
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
    
    ACTION: Direct Final Action to Delete the Dutchtown Oil Treatment 
    Superfund Site from the National Priorities List.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 
    announces its direct final action to delete the Dutchtown Oil Treatment 
    Superfund Site (Site), located in Ascension Parish, Louisiana, from the 
    National Priorities List (NPL). The NPL is Appendix B of 40 CFR part 
    300 which is the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution 
    Contingency Plan (NCP), which the EPA promulgated pursuant to section 
    105 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 
    Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, 42 U.S.C. 9605, as amended. This direct 
    final action to delete is being taken by the EPA, with the concurrence 
    of the State of Louisiana, because the EPA has determined that 
    responsible parties have implemented all appropriate response actions 
    required, and such actions remain protective of public health and the 
    environment.
    
    DATES: This direct final action will be effective November 16, 1999, 
    unless the EPA receives significant adverse or critical comments by 
    October 18, 1999. If adverse comments are received, we will publish a 
    timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and 
    inform the public that the rule will not take effect.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Ms. Janetta Coats, Community 
    Relations Coordinator (6SF-PO), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 
    Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, telephone (214) 
    665-6617.
        Information Repositories: Comprehensive information on the Site is 
    available for viewing and copying at the Site information repositories 
    at the following locations: U.S. EPA Region 6 Library (12th Floor), 
    1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, (214) 665-6424/665-6427; 
    Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, 7290 Bluebonnet Road, 
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70809, (225) 765-0487; Ascension Parish Library, 
    708 S. Irma Blvd., Gonzales, LA 70737, (504) 647-3955.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Stephen L. Tzhone, Remedial 
    Project Manager (6SF-LP), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 
    6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, telephone (214) 665-
    8409.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Table of Contents
    I. Introduction
    II. NPL Deletion Criteria
    III. Deletion Procedures
    IV. Basis for Site Deletion
    V. Action
    
    I. Introduction
    
        The EPA Region 6 announces the deletion of the Site from the NPL 
    and requests comments on the deletion. The EPA identifies sites that 
    appear to present a significant risk to public health or the 
    environment and maintains the NPL as the list of those sites. Sites on 
    the NPL may be subject to response actions financed by the Hazardous 
    Substance Superfund (Fund). As stated in Sec. 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP, 
    sites deleted from the NPL remain eligible for further Fund-financed 
    remedial actions should future conditions at the site warrant such 
    action.
        The EPA will accept comments concerning this direct final action to 
    delete for 30 days after publication of this document in the Federal 
    Register. If no significant adverse or critical comments are received, 
    the Site will be deleted from the NPL effective November 16, 1999. 
    However, if significant adverse or critical comments are received 
    within the 30 day comment period, the EPA will publish a notice of 
    withdrawal of this direct final action to delete within 60 days of 
    publication of the original document and prepare a response to the 
    comments and continue with the rulemaking process on the basis of the 
    proposal to delete and the comments already received.
        Section II of this document explains the criteria for deleting 
    sites from the NPL. Section III discusses procedures the EPA is using 
    for this action. Section IV discusses the Site and how the Site meets 
    one of the criteria. Section V states the EPA's action to delete Site 
    from the NPL.
    
    II. NPL Deletion Criteria
    
        Section 300.425(e) of the NCP provides that releases may be deleted 
    from or recategorized on the NPL where no further response is 
    appropriate. In making a determination to delete a release from the 
    NPL, EPA shall consider, in consultation with the State, whether any of 
    the following criteria have been met:
         Responsible parties or other persons have implemented all 
    appropriate response actions required;
         All appropriate Fund-financed response under CERCLA has 
    been implemented, and no further response action by responsible parties 
    is appropriate; or
         The remedial investigation has shown that the release 
    poses no significant threat to public health or the environment and, 
    therefore, taking of remedial measures is not appropriate.
        Even if a site is deleted from the NPL, where hazardous substances, 
    pollutants, or contaminants remain at the site above levels that allow 
    for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure, a subsequent review of the 
    site will be conducted at least every five years after the initiation 
    of the remedial action at the site to ensure that the site remains 
    protective of public health and the environment. If new information 
    becomes available which indicates a need for further action, the EPA 
    may initiate remedial actions. Whenever there is a significant release 
    from a site deleted from the NPL,
    
    [[Page 50458]]
    
    the site may be restored to the NPL without application of the hazard 
    ranking system.
    
    III. Deletion Procedures
    
        The following procedures apply to the deletion of the Site:
         The EPA consulted with the State of Louisiana on this 
    deletion from the NPL prior to developing this direct final action to 
    delete.
         The EPA provided the State of Louisiana at least 30 
    working days for review of this direct final action to delete prior to 
    its publication in the Federal Register, and the State of Louisiana 
    concurred with this direct final action to delete.
         Concurrently with publication of this direct final action 
    to delete, a notice of availability of this direct action to delete is 
    being published in a major local newspaper of general circulation at or 
    near the Site and is being distributed to appropriate Federal, State, 
    and local officials and other interested parties; said notice announces 
    the 30 day public comment period concerning the intended deletion.
         The EPA has placed copies of information supporting the 
    deletion in the information repositories, which information is 
    available for public inspection and copying.
        Deletion of a site from the NPL does not itself create, alter, or 
    revoke any individual's rights or obligations. The NPL is designed 
    primarily for informational purposes and to assist the EPA management.
        The EPA Region 6 will accept and evaluate public comments on the 
    EPA's direct final action to delete before the EPA makes a final 
    decision. If necessary, the EPA will prepare a responsiveness summary 
    to address any significant public comments received. If no significant 
    adverse or critical comments are received during the comment period, 
    the Site will be deleted from the NPL effective November 16, 1999.
    
    IV. Basis for Site Deletion
    
        The following information provides the EPA's rationale for deleting 
    this Site from the NPL:
    
    A. Background
    
        The Site is an abandoned waste oil reclamation plant located at the 
    intersection of Interstate 10 and Highway 74 in Ascension Parish, 
    Louisiana. Previously located on this 5-acre Site were a holding pond, 
    waste pit, seven above ground vertical storage tanks, two small 
    horizontal tanks, and a railroad tank car used as a horizontal tank. 
    Monitoring wells are currently scattered throughout the perimeter of 
    the Site.
    
    B. Expedited Response Action Activities
    
        The EPA issued an action memorandum for an expedited response 
    action (ERA) on March 25, 1988. A consent decree between EPA and 
    responsible parties to design and implement the ERA was entered on May 
    23, 1990.
        Mobilization for the ERA began in November 1990, and field 
    activities were conducted from January 1991 through August 1991. The 
    ERA field activities consisted of:
         Removal of the contents of the holding pond, waste oil 
    pit, and the above ground storage tanks,
         Treatment and disposal of water from the pits, 
    decontamination activities, and tank cleaning, and
         Excavation and treatment of the soils under the waste pits 
    and holding ponds by soil washing to concentrations less than 4 parts 
    per million of benzene.
        During the ERA field activities, the following waste quantities 
    were removed and treated:
         449,810 gallons of waste oil from the holding pond, waste 
    oil pit, and tanks were recovered, blended, and shipped for 
    incineration;
         3,451,999 gallons of stormwater from the waste oil pit and 
    the holding pond were treated in the water treatment unit: 2,400,695 
    gallons of water were discharged and 1,051,304 gallons of water were 
    routed to the soil washing unit; and
         4,400 cubic yards of soil were treated by soil washing to 
    concentrations of less than 4.0 ppm, stabilized with fly ash, and 
    placed as backfill into the pond and pit.
        Following completion of the ERA field activities, a French 
    collection drain was installed in the waste oil pit which recovered 
    75,792 gallons of ground water through August 24, 1992. Compacted caps 
    of imported clay were installed over the backfilled holding pond, the 
    French collection drain, and the areas previously occupied by the 
    storage tanks.
    
    C. Remedial Investigation And Feasibility Study Activities
    
        On August 7, 1989, the EPA entered into an administrative order on 
    consent by which a number of responsible parties agreed to perform the 
    remedial investigation (RI) and feasibility study (FS) for the Site. 
    The RI/FS was started concurrently with the ERA and continued after its 
    completion. Soil and ground water investigations during the RI 
    identified risk due to residual contamination within the unusable 
    shallow water bearing zone (Class III classification). Remediation 
    alternatives to address the remaining contamination at the Site were 
    evaluated in the FS, including using natural attenuation, ground water 
    monitoring, and institutional controls to address the residual 
    contamination. The FS was completed in May 1993.
    
    D. Record Of Decision
    
        A Record Of Decision (ROD) for the Site was issued by the EPA on 
    June 20, 1994. Within the ROD, no remedial action (RA) numerical goals 
    were specified because there were no pathways which existed between the 
    residual contaminants within the unusable shallow water bearing zone 
    and any potential receptor population. Also, exposure to surface and 
    subsurface soils at the Site would not result in any excess risk to 
    human health and the environment under current and no action 
    conditions. Therefore, the remedy provided for continued ground water 
    monitoring at the Site to observe that residual contaminants naturally 
    attenuate on their own. RA numerical goals were not needed since the 
    Site posed no excess risk to human health or the environment.
        The components of the ROD's selected remedy include:
         Continued ground water monitoring,
         Institutional controls (deed notices and land use 
    restrictions),
         Installation of additional monitoring wells,
         Maintenance of existing caps and fence,
         Close out of the residential well on property of adjacent 
    residence and drilling of a replacement well, and
         Contingency measures to be implemented if ground water 
    monitoring indicates an increase in contaminant concentrations (either 
    vertically or horizontally).
        A unilateral administrative order (UAO) was issued by the EPA on 
    December 30, 1996, and subsequently amended on January 15, 1997. The 
    UAO for the Site required the responsible parties to implement the 
    remedy as selected in the ROD.
    
    E. Remedial Action Activities
    
        RA activities associated with the selected remedy were implemented 
    during August 1997 by the responsible parties with oversight by the EPA 
    and the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ).
        The Site RA activities included:
         Installing Monitor Well MW-21,
         Sampling all Site wells,
    
    [[Page 50459]]
    
         Plugging and abandoning the adjacent residential well,
         Installing restriction signs,
         Inspecting caps and monitor wells, and
         Mowing vegetation.
        The RA analytical data indicated a significant decrease in residual 
    contaminant concentrations within the unusable water bearing zone. 
    There were no off-site ground water impacts.
    
    F. Pre-Final Inspection Activities
    
        A pre-final inspection was conducted by EPA and LDEQ on October 29, 
    1997. After the inspection, the following activities were completed:
         Additional warning signs were placed at the entrance gate;
         Perimeter fence at the northeast and northwest corners and 
    along the eastern side of the Site was repaired;
         Perimeter fence was cleared of major vegetation; and
         Several monitoring wells were upgraded with installation 
    of locks, protective posts, shroud, and concrete pad.
        Following the completion of these activities, an RA Report was 
    completed on December 12, 1997.
    
    G. Preliminary Close Out Report
    
        A preliminary close out report (PCOR) was completed on January 12, 
    1998. The PCOR states that all RA field activities have been completed 
    and only LTRA ground water monitoring activities associated with 
    natural attenuation are continuing.
    
    H. Long-Term Remedial Action Activities (LTRA)
    
        LTRA ground water monitoring activities continued following the 
    completion of RA field activities. The ground water monitoring data 
    contained within the RA Report, dated December 12, 1997, and the 1st 
    Year Natural Attenuation Report, dated September 1998, revealed that 
    residual contaminants have decreased in concentrations within the 
    unusable shallow water bearing zone since the ERA.
    
    I. Final Close Out Report
    
        The final close out report, completed in August 1999, detailed that 
    all Site response actions, including the LTRA, were accomplished in 
    accordance with CERCLA and consistently with the NCP. Since the Site 
    did not have any RA numerical goals, and data from the RA and LTRA 
    showed that natural attenuation had been taking place, EPA concluded 
    that LTRA activities have been completed and that ground water 
    monitoring and inspection activities will continue through the 
    operation and maintenance stage.
        Based on the completion of the activities listed above, the EPA 
    concludes that responsible parties have implemented all appropriate 
    response actions required and that the Site should be deleted from the 
    NPL.
    
    J. Characterization of Risk
    
        The EPA actions taken to prevent overflow of a contaminated lagoon, 
    cleanup of a diesel fuel spill, and capping a contaminated area at the 
    Site have limited the spread of contaminated wastes, greatly lessened 
    the potential for exposure to contaminants at the Site, and reduced 
    environmental risk for approximately 4,000 people living within 3 miles 
    of the Site. Continued ground water monitoring at the Site will provide 
    data on the residual contaminants' natural attenuation process within 
    the unusable shallow water bearing zone.
    
    K. Community Involvement
    
        Public participation activities required by CERCLA section 113(k), 
    42 U.S.C. 9613(k), and CERCLA section 117, 42 U.S.C. 9617, have been 
    satisfied. Documents which the EPA relied on for Site deletion from the 
    NPL are available to the public in the information repositories.
    
    V. Action
    
        The EPA, with concurrence of the State of Louisiana, has determined 
    that the Site poses no significant threat to human health or the 
    environment, and all appropriate responses under CERCLA at the Site 
    have been completed and that no further response actions, other than 
    O&M and five year reviews, are necessary. Therefore, the EPA is 
    deleting this Site from the NPL.
        Because the EPA considers this action to be noncontroversial and 
    routine, the EPA is taking this action without prior proposal. This 
    direct final action will be effective November 16, 1999, unless the EPA 
    receives significant adverse or critical comments by October 18, 1999. 
    If significant adverse or critical comments are received, the EPA will 
    publish a timely withdrawal of this action in the Federal Register.
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
    
        Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals, 
    Hazardous substances, Hazardous waste, Intergovernmental relations, 
    Natural resources, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, 
    Superfund, Water pollution control, Water supply.
    
        Dated: August 31, 1999.
    Lynda F. Carroll,
    Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
        For the reasons set out in this document, 40 CFR part 300 is 
    amended as follows:
    
    PART 300--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 300 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O. 
    12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 
    2923, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.
    
    Appendix B--[Amended]
    
        2. Table 1 of Appendix B to Part 300 is amended by removing 
    Dutchtown Treatment Plant, Ascension Parish, Louisiana.
    [FR Doc. 99-24039 Filed 9-16-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
11/16/1999
Published:
09/17/1999
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Direct Final Action to Delete the Dutchtown Oil Treatment Superfund Site from the National Priorities List.
Document Number:
99-24039
Dates:
This direct final action will be effective November 16, 1999, unless the EPA receives significant adverse or critical comments by October 18, 1999. If adverse comments are received, we will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will not take effect.
Pages:
50457-50459 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
FRL-6438-7
PDF File:
99-24039.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 300