95-23067. Opportunity to File Amicus Briefs in Cases Involving Possible Furlough of Administrative Law Judges  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 180 (Monday, September 18, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 48169]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-23067]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
    
    
    Opportunity to File Amicus Briefs in Cases Involving Possible 
    Furlough of Administrative Law Judges
    
    AGENCY: Merit Systems Protection Board.
    
    ACTION: The Merit Systems Protection Board is providing an opportunity 
    for interested parties to submit amicus briefs in a number of pending 
    cases filed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Sec. 7521 and 5 CFR 1201.131.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Merit Systems Protection Board currently has seven pending 
    complaints filed by separate agencies pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Sec. 7521 
    and 5 CFR 1201.131. The basic premise of each complaint is that there 
    is a possibility that Congress may not enact an appropriation or 
    continuing resolution for fiscal year 1996 on or before October 1, 
    1995, and that the resulting lapse in funding would necessitate the 
    furlough of all agency employees, including administrative law judges. 
    Therefore, the agencies are requesting that the Board make a finding 
    that there is good cause for the imposition of a furlough action 
    against each agency's administrative law judges.
        The Board also has a complaint filed by the National Labor 
    Relations Board seeking permission to furlough its administrative law 
    judges. The NLRB states in its filing that it anticipates its fiscal 
    year 1996 budget will be insufficient to cover its present rate of 
    spending, and that the furlough of its administrative law judges will 
    thus be necessary to avoid deficit spending.
        The Board has issued orders in each of the eight cases noting that 
    there is a question whether the procedure provided for by 5 U.S.C. 
    Sec. 7521 is intended to cover the situations described in the 
    agencies' complaints. Specifically, the Board has determined that there 
    is a question whether a furlough which seven agencies allege would be 
    necessitated by a lapse in funding caused by the failure of Congress to 
    enact an appropriation or continuing resolution is the type of 
    personnel action to which the protections of 5 U.S.C. Sec. 7521 need by 
    applied. In the case of the NLRB, the Board has determined that there 
    is a question whether a furlough allegedly necessitated by a cut by 
    Congress in the agency's appropriation is an action to which the 
    protections of 5 U.S.C. Sec. 7521 may be applied. In Horner v. 
    Andrzjewski, 811 F.2d 571 (Fed. Cir. 1987), which involved furloughs 
    under a similar statute, 5 U.S.C. Sec. 7513, the court recognized that 
    not all furloughs are within the Board's jurisdiction. The court stated 
    that where a furlough action is taken ``because an agency has no choice 
    * * * it can reasonably be said that an agency did not `take an action' 
    covered by Chapter 75.'' Id. at 576.
        In considering these questions, the Board is concerned with the 
    possibility that the provisions of the Antideficiency Act (31 U.S.C. 
    Secs. 1341, 1350) may be violated by any action the Board might take in 
    declining to authorize an agency the right to furlough administrative 
    law judges due to a lapse in funding caused by the failure to enact 
    appropriation bills or a continuing resolution, or by Congress' failure 
    to fund an agency at current budget levels. The Board is inviting any 
    interested party to submit amicus briefs addressing these 
    jurisdictional issues.
    
    DATES: All briefs submitted in response to this notice shall be filed 
    with the Clerk of the Board on or before September 22, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: All briefs shall be captioned ``Administrative Law Judge 
    Furlough Appeals'' and entitled ``Amicus Brief.'' Only one copy of the 
    brief need be submitted. Briefs should be filed with the Office of the 
    Clerk, Merit Systems Protection Board, 1120 Vermont Avenue NW., 
    Washington, DC 20419.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Shannon McCarthy, Deputy Clerk of the Board, or Matthew Shannon, 
    Counsel to the Clerk, (202) 653-7200.
    
        Dated: September 13, 1995.
    Robert E. Taylor,
    Clerk of the Board.
    [FR Doc. 95-23067 Filed 9-15-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7400-1-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
09/18/1995
Department:
Merit Systems Protection Board
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
The Merit Systems Protection Board is providing an opportunity for interested parties to submit amicus briefs in a number of pending cases filed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Sec. 7521 and 5 CFR 1201.131.
Document Number:
95-23067
Dates:
All briefs submitted in response to this notice shall be filed with the Clerk of the Board on or before September 22, 1995.
Pages:
48169-48169 (1 pages)
PDF File:
95-23067.pdf