96-23896. Extension of Port Limits of Columbus, Ohio  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 18, 1996)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 49058-49059]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-23896]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
    
    Customs Service
    
    19 CFR Part 101
    
    [T.D. 96-67]
    
    
    Extension of Port Limits of Columbus, Ohio
    
    AGENCY: Customs Service, Department of the Treasury.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document amends the Customs Regulations pertaining to the 
    field organization of Customs by extending the geographical limits of 
    the port of Columbus, Ohio, to include Rickenbacker International 
    Airport, which is currently operating as a user fee airport. The 
    boundary expansion of the Columbus port has occurred because of 
    increased business at Rickenbacker International Airport. The Customs 
    Regulations are also being amended to remove Rickenbacker International 
    Airport's designation as a user fee airport. This change is being made 
    as part of Customs continuing program to obtain more efficient use of 
    its personnel, facilities, and resources and to provide better service 
    to carriers, importers, and the general public.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: October 18, 1996.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Harry Denning, Office of Field 
    Operations, (202) 927-0196.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        As part of a continuing program to obtain more efficient use of its 
    personnel, facilities, and resources, and to provide better service to 
    carriers, importers, and the general public, Customs is amending 
    Sec. 101.3, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 101.3), by extending the 
    geographical limits of the port of Columbus, Ohio, to include the 
    territory encompassing Rickenbacker International Airport, which is 
    currently a user fee airport.
        Enough business has shifted from within the port to Rickenbacker 
    International Airport to make it worthwhile for Customs to include the 
    airport within the Columbus port boundaries. Customs even plans to 
    relocate its offices to Rickenbacker International Airport.
        The Customs Regulations are also being amended to remove 
    Rickenbacker International Airport from the list of user fee airports 
    in Sec. 122.15, Customs Regulations. Customs will use existing staffing 
    to service the expanded area of the port of Columbus, Ohio.
    
    Comments and Analysis
    
        A Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) was published in the Federal 
    Register (61 FR 8001) on March 1, 1996, which discussed the proposed 
    extension of the Port of Columbus. As a result of the NPRM, two 
    comments were received.
        The comments were from the Columbus Airport Authority and the 
    Department of Trade and Development of the City of Columbus. The 
    comments do not oppose the extension of the port limits of the Port of 
    Columbus, but they are concerned with maintaining the level of Customs 
    services at Port Columbus International Airport.
        The Columbus Airport Authority, which operates Port Columbus 
    International Airport where the Customs offices are currently located, 
    requests assurances that there will be no lowering of the current level 
    of services. It also wishes the Customs Service to provide the required 
    services for a projected growth in international flights.
        The Department of Trade and Development comment explores the 
    planned long term development of Port Columbus International Airport. 
    The airport expects growth in international service as a result of 
    recent negotiations involving the potential Canadian market for flights 
    to Columbus and as part of its
    
    [[Page 49059]]
    
    membership in the United States Airports for Better International Air 
    Service. At the same time, the Department is involved in expanding the 
    capabilities of Rickenbacker International Airport. The Department is 
    concerned with the long term economic viability of both airports.
        The Customs Service wishes to emphasize that the extension of the 
    Port of Columbus limits to include Rickenbacker International Airport 
    and the move of the port Customs office to Rickenbacker International 
    Airport will not affect Customs service at either airport. Rickenbacker 
    International Airport was a designated user fee airport. Now that the 
    extension of the Port of Columbus is final, the airport will get 
    regular Customs service. The Port Columbus International Airport will 
    continue to receive its regular Customs service.
        The Customs Service assures both commenters that there will be no 
    change in the level of Customs service at either facility. Furthermore, 
    Customs anticipates that it will be able to provide sufficient 
    resources to process the increase in workload foreseen by the 
    commenters.
    
    Conclusion
    
        Inasmuch as the comments are favorable toward the change as long as 
    the current levels of Customs service are maintained and Customs 
    anticipates no change in the level of service at either Rickenbacker 
    International Airport or the Port Columbus International Airport, 
    Customs is proceeding with the amendment.
    
    Port Limits
    
        The previous port limits of the port of Columbus, Ohio, established 
    in Treasury Decision (T.D.) 82-9, included all of the territory within 
    the corporate limits of Columbus, Ohio, all of the territory completely 
    surrounded by the city of Columbus, and all of the territory enclosed 
    by Interstate Highway 270 (outer belt), which completely surrounds the 
    city.
        The expanded port limits of Columbus, Ohio, encompass the port 
    limits set forth in T.D. 82-9 as well as the following territory:
    
        Beginning at the intersection of Rohr and Lockbourne Roads, then 
    proceeding southerly along Lockbourne Road to Commerce Street, 
    thence easterly along Commerce Street to its intersection with the N 
    & W railroad tracks, then southerly along the N & W railroad tracks 
    to the Franklin-Pickaway County line, thence easterly along the 
    Franklin-Pickaway County line to its intersection with Pontius Road, 
    then northerly along Pontius Road to its intersection with Rohr 
    Road, thence westerly along Rohr Road to its intersection with 
    Lockbourne Road, the point of beginning, all within the County of 
    Franklin, State of Ohio.
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Act and Executive Order 12866
    
        Customs routinely establishes, expands, and consolidates Customs 
    ports of entry throughout the United States to accommodate the volume 
    of Customs-related activity in various parts of the country. Thus, 
    although this document is being issued with notice for public comment, 
    because it relates to agency management and organization, it is not 
    subject to the notice and public procedure requirements of 5 U.S.C. 
    553. Accordingly, this document is not subject to the provisions of the 
    Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
        Agency organization matters such as this proposed port extension 
    are exempt from consideration under Executive Order 12866.
    
    Drafting Information
    
        The principal author of this document was Janet L. Johnson, 
    Regulations Branch. However, personnel from other offices participated 
    in its development.
    
    List of Subjects
    
    19 CFR Part 101
    
        Customs duties and inspection, Exports, Imports, Organization and 
    functions (Government agencies).
    
    19 CFR Part 122
    
        Administrative practice and procedure, Air carriers, Aircraft, 
    Airports, Customs duties and inspection, Freight, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements.
    
    Amendments to the Regulations
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, part 101 and part 122 of 
    the Customs Regulations are amended as set forth below.
    
    PART 101--GENERAL PROVISIONS
    
        1. The general authority citation for part 101 and the specific 
    authority citation for Sec. 101.3 continue to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 19 U.S.C. 2, 66, 1202 (General Note 20, 
    Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1623, 1624.
    
        Sections 101.3 and 101.4 also issued under 19 U.S.C. 1 and 58b;
    * * * * *
    
    
    Sec. 101.3  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 101.3(b)(1) is amended by removing the reference ``T.D. 
    82-9'' in the ``Limits of port'' column adjacent to the entry of 
    Columbus in the ``Ports of entry'' column under the state of Ohio and 
    by adding the reference ``T.D. 96-67'' in its place.
    
    PART 122--AIR COMMERCE REGULATIONS
    
        1. The general authority citation for part 122 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 58b, 66, 1433, 1436, 1459, 
    1590, 1594, 1623, 1624, 1644; 49 U.S.C. App. 1509.
    
    
    Sec. 122.15  [Amended]
    
        2. The list of user fee airports in Sec. 122.15(b) is amended by 
    removing ``Columbus, Ohio'' from the left column labelled ``Location'' 
    and by removing ``Rickenbacker Airport'' from the adjacent right column 
    labelled ``Name.''
    George J. Weise,
    Commissioner of Customs.
        Approved: August 29, 1996.
    Dennis M. O'Connell,
    Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
    [FR Doc. 96-23896 Filed 9-17-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
10/18/1996
Published:
09/18/1996
Department:
Customs Service
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
96-23896
Dates:
October 18, 1996.
Pages:
49058-49059 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
T.D. 96-67
PDF File:
96-23896.pdf
CFR: (2)
19 CFR 101.3
19 CFR 122.15