94-23048. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Amending the Prompt Receipt and Delivery of Securities Interpretation Relating to Short Sales  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 180 (Monday, September 19, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-23048]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: September 19, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Rel. No. 34-34653; File No. SR-NASD-94-32]
    
     
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Order Approving Proposed Rule 
    Change Amending the Prompt Receipt and Delivery of Securities 
    Interpretation Relating to Short Sales
    
    September 12, 1994.
        On July 28, 1994, the National Association of Securities Dealers, 
    Inc. (``NASD'' or ``Association'') filed with the Securities and 
    Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') a proposed rule 
    change\1\ pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act 
    of 1934 (``Act'')\2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\3\ The rule change 
    amends the Prompt Receipt and Delivery of Securities Interpretation 
    (``Interpretation'') issued by the NASD Board of Governors under 
    Article III, Section 1 of the NASD Rules of Fair Practice.\4\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\The NASD amended the proposed rule change subsequent to the 
    original filing on May 26, 1994. Amendment No. 1 was filed in order 
    to clarify that the proposal applies to both NASD members and 
    persons associated with NASD members.
        \2\15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
        \3\17 CFR 240.19b-4.
        \4\NASD Manual, Rules of Fair Practice, Art. III, Sec. 1, (CCH) 
    2151.04.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The NASD proposes to amend the Interpretation to require members or 
    persons associated with members, to annotate the affirmative 
    determination made prior to effecting a short sale. The affirmative 
    determination requirement already appears in the Interpretation and 
    requires, among other things, that members or associated persons assure 
    that the securities involved in a sale will be available by settlement 
    date. For long sales, the affirmative determination is required to be 
    noted on the order ticket at the time the order is placed. The 
    Interpretation as it currently reads, however, does not require that 
    such determination be evidenced in any specific manner with respect to 
    short sales.
        Under the Interpretation as amended, members or associated persons 
    will be required to annotate, on the trade ticket or on some other 
    record maintained for that purpose by the member, the following 
    information in order to comply with the affirmative determination 
    requirement for short sales:
        1. Where a customer assures delivery, the member or associated 
    person must annotate that conversation noting the present location of 
    the securities; whether the securities are in good deliverable form; 
    and whether the securities will be delivered to the firm within time 
    for settlement; or
        2. Where the member or associated person locates the stock, an 
    annotation must be made that identifies not only the number of shares 
    needed to cover the short sale but also the individual and firm 
    contacted that offered assurance that the shares would be delivered or 
    were available for borrowing by settlement date.\5\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \5\Pursuant to Rule 440C, The New York Stock Exchange (``NYSE'') 
    also requires NYSE members to make affirmative determinations prior 
    to effecting short sales and to annotate such determinations. NYSE 
    Information Memo 91-41 (October 18, 1991).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In its proposed amendment to the Interpretation, the NASD has not 
    specified the manner in which a member or person associated with a 
    member must annotate compliance with the affirmative determination 
    requirement applicable to short sales. It is clear, however, that the 
    affirmative determination requirement contained in the amendment to the 
    Interpretation applies to each and every transaction; a ``blanket'' or 
    standing assurance that securities are available for borrowing is not 
    acceptable to satisfy the requirement as is evidenced by the duty to 
    annotate.
        Notice of the proposed rule change, as amended, together with its 
    terms of substance was provided by issuance of a Commission release\6\ 
    and by publication in the Federal Register.\7\ No comments were 
    received in response to the Notice. This order approves the proposed 
    rule change.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \6\Securities Exchange Act Rel. No. 34487 (August 4, 1994).
        \7\59 FR 40931 (August 10, 1994).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        As the NASD indicated in its filing, requiring annotations will 
    enhance member compliance with the affirmative determination 
    requirement already imposed by the Interpretation and will enable the 
    NASD to examine member compliance with the rule more effectively. The 
    NASD also noted that the amendment will make clear the NASD's 
    longstanding policy that firms may not rely on daily facsimile sheets 
    of ``borrowable stocks'' to satisfy their obligations under the 
    Interpretation. The addition of the annotation requirement will 
    preclude this practice as members or their associated persons will have 
    to annotate the name of the person contacted, the name of the firm 
    contacted and the number of shares for each short sale.
        The Commission has determined to approve the NASD's proposal. The 
    Commission finds that the rule change is consistent with the 
    requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder 
    applicable to the NASD, including the requirements of Section 15A(b)(6) 
    of the Act.\8\ Section 15A(b)(6) requires that the rules of a national 
    securities association be designed to prevent fraudulent and 
    manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable 
    principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with 
    persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing 
    information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in 
    securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a 
    free and open market and a national market system, and in general to 
    protect investors and the public interest. The proposal will enable the 
    NASD to more effectively enforce an already existing provision of the 
    Prompt Receipt and Delivery Interpretation requiring members of their 
    associated persons to affirmatively determine that shares relating to a 
    short sale are available for delivery to a purchaser.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \8\15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Requiring annotation of affirmative determinations will also 
    enhance the NASD's ability to examine for member compliance with 
    various other NASD short sale rules including those found in Article 
    III, Section 21 of the Rules of Fair Practice (record keeping)\9\ and 
    in the Uniform Practice Code, Section 71 (mandatory close-outs).\10\ 
    Further, the annotation requirement will assist the NASD in examining 
    for member compliance with the short sale rule or ``bid test,'' 
    recently granted temporary 18 month approval by the SEC.\11\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \9\NASD Manual, Rules of Fair Practice, Article III, Sec. 21, 
    (CCH) 2171.
        \10\NASD Manual, Uniform Practice Code, Sec. 71, (CCH) 3571.
        \11\Securities Exchange Act Rel. No. 34277 (June 29, 1994), 59 
    FR 34885 (July 7, 1994).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, 
    that the proposed rule change SR-NASD-94-32 be, and hereby is, 
    approved.
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \12\17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 94-23048 Filed 9-16-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
09/19/1994
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-23048
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: September 19, 1994, Rel. No. 34-34653, File No. SR-NASD-94-32