94-21749. Finding of No Significant Impact and Environmental Assessment for Disposal and Reuse of Tacony Warehouse, Philadelphia, PA  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 170 (Friday, September 2, 1994)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-21749]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: September 2, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    Department of the Army
    
     
    
    Finding of No Significant Impact and Environmental Assessment for 
    Disposal and Reuse of Tacony Warehouse, Philadelphia, PA
    
    AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.
    
    ACTION: Finding of no significant impact.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The proposed action analyzed by this document is the disposal 
    and reuse of the Tacony Warehouse facility, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 
    as required by the Defense Authorization Amendments and the Base 
    Closure and Realignment Act (Pub. L. 100-526). The Army will dispose of 
    an approximately 14 acre parcel of land with improvements. The Fort Dix 
    Directorate of Public Works has been maintaining the facility since 
    closure in September 1992.
        The alternatives are expressed in terms of Army imposed conditions 
    for real estate disposal. An ``Unencumbered Alternative'' represents 
    the ability to turn over the property with no Army imposed conditions. 
    An ``Encumbered Alternative'' deals with property transferred with 
    conditions imposed by the Army. This may be due to mitigation required 
    by another regulatory agency or may be required to protect Army 
    interests. Council on Environmental Quality and Army regulations 
    implementing the National Environmental Protection Act require a no-
    action alternative as a benchmark against which proposed actions are 
    evaluated. For this document, this is the ``Caretaker'' alternative.
        The ``Unencumbered Alternative'', the ``Encumbered Alternative'', 
    and the ``No Action Alternative'' (Caretaker) have been addressed in 
    the Environmental Assessment (EA). In the ``Unencumbered Alternative'', 
    the facility will be available for reuse under a range of projected 
    levels of reuse. Those projected levels of reuse are: High Intensity 
    Use, Medium Intensity Use, Low Intensity Use and Open Space.
        High Intensity Use is defined when all of the property is offered 
    for sale for a light industrial/commercial reuse. There would be 
    renovation of existing structures to house a light industrial/
    commercial enterprise. Some construction activities, including building 
    office and showroom space, will be performed within existing 
    structures.
        Medium Intensity Use is when all of the property is used as a 
    regional distribution center. The facility's area of distribution will 
    be the Mid-Atlantic States region. There will be renovations of 
    existing structures and renovation of the rail lines entering the site.
        Low Intensity use would occur if all of the property is sold or 
    transferred for reuse as warehouse. An example of Open Space is when 
    the remainder of the parcel will be transferred to the city for use as 
    an outdoor recreation area.
        Land use in the ``Encumbered Alternative'' is similar to ``Low 
    Intensity Use'' addressed in the ``Unencumbered Alternative.'' The 
    identified encumbrance is associated with groundwater remediation 
    activities and will restrict use of groundwater for human ingestion or 
    industrial purposes. Additionally, the 0.9 acre parcel adjacent to the 
    state owned boat ramp will be transferred to the Pennsylvania Fishing 
    Commission as part of the boat ramp parking and picnic area. In the no 
    action alternative, also known as the ``Caretaker'' alternative, the 
    Army will retain and close the facility. The structures will be allowed 
    to stand, with minimum maintenance activity conducted at the facility.
        The disposal of Tacony Warehouse would not result in significant 
    environmental or socioeconomic impacts. The transfer of 0.9 acres to 
    the Pennsylvania Fishing Commission will have no impact on the 
    environment since the activities and conditions at the 0.9 acre site 
    will not change as a result of the transfer.
        Army Environmental Center studies have identified the extent of 
    contamination at the site. A remediation plan was prepared and 
    coordinated with the Environmental Protection Agency and the 
    Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources. The following 
    remediation has been planned: Removal of underground storage tanks and 
    above ground storage tanks; replacement of polychlorinated biphenyl 
    contaminated transformers; asbestos removal and management; steam 
    cleaning of contaminated building surfaces; contaminated soil and 
    sediment removal; and groundwater collection and monitoring. Since the 
    structures on the property were constructed prior to 1978, the 
    potential for lead based paints exist. The Army does not plan to remove 
    any lead based paint.
        Reuse of the property will have potential impacts to air quality, 
    water quality, soils, and hazardous and toxic materials. The extent of 
    these impacts will be dependent on: (1) The extent of renovation, 
    demolition, and construction activities; and (2) the products produced 
    and stored at the facility. High intensity reuse and Open Space reuse, 
    addressed in the ``Unencumbered Alternative'', will have the greatest 
    impacts on these resources. Best management techniques will lessen the 
    impacts of construction and renovation. Prior to and during operations, 
    consultation will occur with environmental resource agencies, as 
    required, to ensure compliance with all federal, state, and local 
    regulations and guidelines.
        Increases to the facility's utility usage and the surrounding 
    traffic patterns as a result of reuse will not pose a significant 
    impact to the surrounding community. No plant and animal ecologies 
    exist on the property. No cultural resources exist on the site to be 
    affected by reuse. The State Historic Preservation Office has concurred 
    with the Army's determination that no historic properties exist on the 
    site. Since the disposal of Tacony Warehouse does not constitute a 
    major federal action significantly affecting the human environment, an 
    Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 3, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to comment may obtain a copy of the EA or 
    inquire regarding this Finding of No Significant Impact by writing to 
    the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, ATTN: Mr. Larry D. Eastman, Planning 
    Division, P.O. Box 1715, Baltimore, Maryland 21203-1715.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Questions regarding this FNSI may be directed 
    to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, ATTN: Mr. Larry D. Eastman, at 
    (410) 962-3208.
    
        Dated: August 29, 1994.
    Lewis D. Walker,
    Assistant Secretary of the Army, (Environment, Safety and Occupational 
    Health) OASA (IL&E).
    [FR Doc. 94-21749 Filed 9-1-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
09/02/1994
Department:
Army Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Finding of no significant impact.
Document Number:
94-21749
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before October 3, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: September 2, 1994