98-23514. Fresh Prunes Grown in Designated Counties in Washington and Umatilla County, Oregon; Increased Assessment Rate  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 170 (Wednesday, September 2, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 46631-46633]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-23514]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Agricultural Marketing Service
    
    7 CFR Part 924
    
    [Docket No. FV98-924-1 FR]
    
    
    Fresh Prunes Grown in Designated Counties in Washington and 
    Umatilla County, Oregon; Increased Assessment Rate
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This rule increases the assessment rate established for the 
    Washington-Oregon Fresh Prune Marketing Committee (Committee) under 
    Marketing Order No. 924 for the 1998-99 and subsequent fiscal periods 
    from $0.75 to $1.00 per ton of fresh prunes handled. The Committee is 
    responsible for local administration of the marketing order which 
    regulates the handling of fresh prunes grown in designated counties in 
    Washington and Umatilla County, Oregon. Authorization to assess fresh 
    prune handlers enables the Committee to incur expenses that are 
    reasonable and necessary to administer the program. The 1998-99 fiscal 
    period began April 1 and ends March 31. The assessment rate will remain 
    in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: September 3, 1998.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Teresa L. Hutchinson, Northwest 
    Marketing Field Office, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1220 
    SW Third Avenue, Room 369, Portland, OR 97204; telephone: (503) 326-
    2724, Fax: (503) 326-7440 or George J. Kelhart, Marketing Order 
    Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, Room 
    2525-S, P.O. Box 96456, Washington, DC 20090-6456; telephone: (202) 
    720-2491, Fax: (202) 205-6632. Small businesses may request information 
    on compliance with this regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing 
    Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 
    Room 2525-S, P.O. Box 96456, Washington, DC 20090-6456; telephone: 
    (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 205-6632.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing 
    Agreement and Order No. 924, both as amended (7 CFR part 924), 
    regulating the handling of fresh prunes grown in designated counties in 
    Washington and Umatilla County, Oregon hereinafter referred to as the 
    ``order.'' The marketing agreement and order are effective under the 
    Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
    674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
        The Department of Agriculture (Department) is issuing this rule in 
    conformance with Executive Order 12866.
        This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil 
    Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, fresh prune 
    handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to administer the order are 
    derived from such assessments. It is intended that the assessment rate 
    as issued herein will be applicable to all assessable fresh prunes 
    beginning April 1, 1998, and continue until modified, suspended, or 
    terminated. This rule will not preempt any State or local laws, 
    regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable 
    conflict with this rule.
        The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
    before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
    Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the Secretary a 
    petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any 
    obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance 
    with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted 
    therefrom. Such handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on 
    the petition. After the hearing the Secretary would rule on the 
    petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States 
    in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or 
    her principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review the 
    Secretary's ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not 
    later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
        This rule increases the assessment rate established for the 
    Committee for the 1998-99 and subsequent fiscal periods from $0.75 to 
    $1.00 per ton of fresh prunes handled.
        The order provides authority for the Committee, with the approval 
    of the Department, to formulate an annual budget of expenses and 
    collect assessments from handlers to administer the program. The 
    Committee consists of six producer members and three handler members, 
    each of whom is familiar with the Committee's needs and with the
    
    [[Page 46632]]
    
    costs for goods and services in their local area and are thus in a 
    position to formulate an appropriate budget and assessment rate. The 
    budget and assessment rate were discussed at a public meeting and all 
    directly affected persons had an opportunity to participate and provide 
    input.
        For the 1997-98 and subsequent fiscal periods, the Committee 
    recommended, and the Department approved, an assessment rate of $0.75 
    per ton that would continue in effect from fiscal period to fiscal 
    period indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by the 
    Secretary upon recommendation and information submitted by the 
    Committee or other information available to the Secretary.
        The Committee met on June 3, 1998, and unanimously recommended 
    1998-99 expenditures of $7,003 and an assessment rate of $1.00 per ton 
    of fresh prunes handled during the 1998-99 and subsequent fiscal 
    periods. In comparison, last year's budgeted expenditures were $7,233. 
    The assessment rate of $1.00 is $0.25 more than the rate currently in 
    effect. The Committee recommended an increased assessment rate because 
    the current rate would not generate enough income to adequately 
    administer the program. The Committee decided that an assessment rate 
    of more than $1.00 would generate income in excess of that needed to 
    adequately administer the program.
        Major expenses recommended by the Committee for the 1998-99 fiscal 
    period include $2,880 for manager salary, $1,000 for travel, $528 for 
    rent and maintenance, and $475 for audit. Budgeted expenses for these 
    items in 1997-98 were $2,880, $1,000, $440, and $465, respectively.
        The assessment rate recommended by the Committee was derived by 
    dividing anticipated expenses by expected shipments of fresh prunes. 
    Fresh prune shipments for the year are estimated at 4,800 tons, which 
    should provide $4,800 in assessment income. Income derived from handler 
    assessments, along with funds from the Committee's authorized reserve, 
    should be adequate to cover budgeted expenses. Funds in the reserve 
    (currently $6,709) will be kept within the maximum permitted by the 
    order of approximately one fiscal period's operational expenses 
    (Sec. 924.42).
        The assessment rate established in this rule will continue in 
    effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by the 
    Secretary upon recommendation and information submitted by the 
    Committee or other available information.
        Although this assessment rate will be in effect for an indefinite 
    period, the Committee will continue to meet prior to or during each 
    fiscal period to recommend a budget of expenses and consider 
    recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and 
    times of Committee meetings are available from the Committee or the 
    Department. Committee meetings are open to the public and interested 
    persons may express their views at these meetings. The Department will 
    evaluate Committee recommendations and other available information to 
    determine whether modification of the assessment rate is needed. 
    Further rulemaking will be undertaken as necessary. The Committee's 
    1998-99 budget and those for subsequent fiscal periods will be reviewed 
    and, as appropriate, approved by the Department.
        Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
    Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the 
    economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has 
    prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis.
        The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
    business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
    not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
    pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in 
    that they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
    entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small 
    entity orientation and compatibility.
        There are approximately 350 producers of fresh prunes in the 
    production area and approximately 30 handlers subject to regulation 
    under the marketing order. Small agricultural producers have been 
    defined by the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.601) as those 
    having annual receipts less than $500,000 and small agricultural 
    service firms are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than 
    $5,000,000. The majority of fresh prune producers and handlers may be 
    classified as small entities.
        This rule increases the assessment rate established for the 
    Committee and collected from handlers for the 1998-99 and subsequent 
    fiscal periods from $0.75 to $1.00 per ton of fresh prunes handled. The 
    Committee met on June 3, 1998, and unanimously recommended 1998-99 
    expenditures of $7,003 and an assessment rate of $1.00 per ton of fresh 
    prunes handled. In comparison, last year's budgeted expenditures were 
    $7,233. The assessment rate of $1.00 is $0.25 more than the rate 
    currently in effect. The Committee recommended an increased assessment 
    rate because the current rate would not generate enough income to 
    adequately administer the program. The Committee decided that an 
    assessment rate of more than $1.00 would generate income in excess of 
    that needed to adequately administer the program.
        Major expenses recommended by the Committee for the 1998-99 fiscal 
    period include $2,880 for manager salary, $1,000 for travel, $528 for 
    rent and maintenance, and $475 for audit. Budgeted expenses for these 
    items in 1997-98 were $2,880, $1,000, $440, and $465, respectively.
        The assessment rate recommended by the Committee was derived by 
    dividing anticipated expenses by expected shipments of fresh prunes. 
    Fresh prune shipments for the year are estimated at 4,800 tons, which 
    should provide $4,800 in assessment income. Income derived from handler 
    assessments, along with funds from the Committee's authorized reserve, 
    should be adequate to cover budgeted expenses. The reserve is within 
    the maximum permitted by the order of approximately one fiscal period's 
    operational expenses (Sec. 924.42).
        Recent price information indicates that the grower price for the 
    1998-99 marketing season will range between $200 and $500 per ton of 
    fresh prunes handled. Therefore, the estimated assessment revenue for 
    the 1998-99 fiscal period as a percentage of total grower revenue will 
    range between 0.20 and 0.50 percent.
        This action increases the assessment obligation imposed on 
    handlers. While assessments impose some additional costs on handlers, 
    the costs are minimal and uniform on all handlers. Some of the 
    additional costs may be passed on to producers. However, these costs 
    are offset by the benefits derived by the operation of the marketing 
    order. In addition, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized 
    throughout the fresh prune industry and all interested persons were 
    invited to attend the meeting and participate in Committee 
    deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the June 3, 
    1998, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and 
    small, were able to express views on this issue.
        This rule imposes no additional reporting or recordkeeping 
    requirements on either small or large fresh prune handlers. As with all 
    Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically 
    reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry 
    and public sector agencies.
        The Department has not identified any relevant Federal rules that
    
    [[Page 46633]]
    
    duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this rule.
        A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal 
    Register on July 16, 1998 (63 FR 38349). The proposal was made 
    available through the Internet by the Office of the Federal Register. A 
    30-day comment period ending August 17, 1998, was provided for 
    interested persons to respond to the proposal. No comments were 
    received.
        After consideration of all relevant material presented, including 
    the information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other 
    available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as 
    hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of 
    the Act.
        Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined that good 
    cause exists for not postponing the effective date of this rule until 
    30 days after publication in the Federal Register because: (1) The 
    1998-99 fiscal period began on April 1, 1998, and the order requires 
    that the rate of assessment for each fiscal period apply to all 
    assessable fresh prunes handled during such fiscal period; (2) the 
    Committee needs to have sufficient funds to pay its expenses which are 
    incurred on a continuous basis; (3) handlers are aware of this action 
    which was unanimously recommended by the Committee at a public meeting 
    and is similar to other assessment rate actions issued in past years; 
    and (4) a 30-day comment period was provided and no comments were 
    received.
    
    List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 924
    
        Marketing agreements, Plums, Prunes, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 924 is 
    amended as follows:
    
    PART 924--FRESH PRUNES GROWN IN DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN WASHINGTON 
    AND UMATILLA COUNTY, OREGON
    
        1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 924 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
    
    
    Sec. 924.236  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 924.236 is amended by removing the words ``April 1, 
    1997,'' and adding in their place ``April 1, 1998,'' and by removing 
    ``$0.75'' and adding in its place ``$1.00.''
    
        Dated: August 26, 1998.
    Robert C. Keeney,
    Deputy Administrator, Fruit and Vegetable Programs.
    [FR Doc. 98-23514 Filed 9-1-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
9/3/1998
Published:
09/02/1998
Department:
Agricultural Marketing Service
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
98-23514
Dates:
September 3, 1998.
Pages:
46631-46633 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. FV98-924-1 FR
PDF File:
98-23514.pdf
CFR: (1)
7 CFR 924.236