98-23600. Airworthiness Directives; Schweizer Aircraft Corporation and Hughes Helicopters, Inc. Model 269A, 269A-1, 269B, 269C, 269D, and TH- 55A Helicopters  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 170 (Wednesday, September 2, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 46645-46647]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-23600]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 96-SW-10-AD; Amendment 39-10727; AD 98-18-11]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Schweizer Aircraft Corporation and 
    Hughes Helicopters, Inc. Model 269A, 269A-1, 269B, 269C, 269D, and TH-
    55A Helicopters
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), 
    applicable to Schweizer Aircraft Corporation and Hughes Helicopters, 
    Inc. Model 269A, 269A-1, 269B, 269C, 269D, and TH-55A helicopters, that 
    requires a visual inspection of the bond line between the main rotor 
    blade abrasion strip (abrasion strip) and the blade for voids, 
    separation, or lifting of the abrasion strip; a visual inspection of 
    the adhesive bead around the perimeter of the abrasion strip for 
    erosion, cracks, or blisters; a tap (ring) test of the abrasion strip 
    for evidence of debonding or hidden corrosion voids; and removal of any 
    blade with an unairworthy abrasion strip and replacement with an 
    airworthy blade. This amendment is prompted by four reports that 
    indicate that debonding and corrosion have occurred on certain blades 
    where the abrasion strip attaches to the blade skin. The actions 
    specified by this AD are intended to prevent loss of the abrasion strip 
    from the blade and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: October 7, 1998.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Raymond Reinhardt, Aerospace 
    Engineer, FAA, New York Aircraft Certification Office, Airframe and 
    Propulsion Branch, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 10 Fifth Street, 
    3rd Floor, Valley Stream, New York 11581-1200, telephone (516) 256-
    7532, fax (516) 568-2716.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an AD that is 
    applicable to Schweizer Aircraft Corporation and Hughes Helicopters, 
    Inc. Model 269A, 269A-1, 269B, 269C, 269D, and TH-55A series 
    helicopters was published in the Federal Register on October 30, 1996 
    (61 FR 55937). That action proposed to require, for each blade, a 
    visual inspection of the bond line between the abrasion strip and the 
    blade for voids, separation, or lifting of the abrasion strip; a visual 
    inspection of the adhesive bead around the perimeter of the abrasion 
    strip for erosion, cracks, or blisters; a tap (ring) test of the 
    abrasion strip for evidence of debonding or hidden corrosion voids; and 
    removal of any blade with a defective abrasion strip and replacement 
    with an airworthy blade. If any deterioration of the abrasion strip 
    adhesive bead was discovered, restoration of the bead in accordance 
    with the applicable maintenance manual was proposed. If an abrasion 
    strip void was found or suspected, removing and replacing the blade 
    with an airworthy blade was also proposed.
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to 
    the comments received.
        One commenter states that Model 269C-1 helicopters should be 
    included in the Applicability section of the AD, because this model, 
    which was recently type certificated, could be retro-fitted with any of 
    the affected blades listed in the proposed AD. The FAA concurs,
    
    [[Page 46646]]
    
    and future rulemaking action will address this issue.
        The same commenter states that a terminating action should be added 
    to the AD. The commenter states that if any of the affected blades are 
    subject to an abrasion strip repair, those blades should no longer be 
    subject to the repetitive inspections listed in the AD. The FAA 
    concurs, and a paragraph will be added to the AD to state that, for an 
    affected blade, blade abrasion strip repair is considered a terminating 
    action for the requirements of this AD. A requirement was added to 
    identify repaired blades.
        Another commenter states that the abrasion strip inspections called 
    out in the proposed AD are inadequate to detect defective abrasion 
    strips. The FAA does not concur; the specified inspections are adequate 
    to detect defective abrasion strips and these inspections will remain 
    in the AD.
        The commenter also states that current abrasion strip materials and 
    abrasion strip bonding methods are inadequate to assure long-term 
    durability. The FAA does not concur; when performed correctly the 
    current abrasion strip materials and abrasion strip bonding methods are 
    adequate and demonstrate an acceptable service life.
        Finally, the commenter would like the FAA to re-evaluate current 
    regulations pertaining to abrasion strip technology and revise the 
    regulations to include minimum performance criteria for adhesively 
    bonded abrasion strip assemblies. The FAA does not concur; current 
    regulations have demonstrated an acceptable level of safety for 
    abrasion strip bonding.
        After careful review of the available data, including the comments 
    noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public 
    interest require the adoption of the rule with the change described 
    previously, as well as with other non-substantive changes. The FAA has 
    determined that these changes will neither increase the economic burden 
    on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD.
        The FAA estimates that 100 helicopters of U.S. registry will be 
    affected by this AD, that it will take approximately one-third of a 
    work hour per helicopter to conduct the initial inspections; 
    approximately one-third of a work hour to conduct the repetitive 
    inspections; approximately 11 work hours to remove and reinstall a 
    blade; and approximately 32 work hours to repair the blade; and that 
    the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Required parts 
    (replacement abrasion strips) will cost approximately $57 per main 
    rotor abrasion strip (each helicopter has three main rotor blades). 
    Based on these figures, the total cost impact of the AD on U.S. 
    operators is estimated to be $135,850 per year for the first year and 
    $133,850 for each year thereafter, assuming one-sixth of the affected 
    blades in the fleet are removed, repaired, and reinstalled each year, 
    and that all affected helicopters are subjected to one repetitive 
    inspection each year.
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
    and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    from the Rules Docket at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, 
    Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas 
    76137.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive 
    to read as follows:
    
    AD 98-18-11  Schweizer Aircraft Corporation and Hughes Helicopters, 
    INC.: Amendment 39-10727. Docket No. 96-SW-10-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model 269A, 269A-1, 269B, and TH-55A helicopters 
    with main rotor blades, part number (P/N) 269A1190-1, serial numbers 
    (S/N) S0001 through S0012 installed; and Model 269C and 269D 
    helicopters with main rotor blades, P/N 269A1185-1, S/N S222, S312, 
    S313, S325 through S327, S339, S341, S343, S346, S347, S349 through 
    S367, S369 through S377, S379 through S391, S393 through S395, S397, 
    S399, S401 through S417, S419 through S424, S426 through S449, S451 
    through S507, S509 through S513, S516 through S527, S529 through 
    S540, S542, S544 through S560, S562 through S584, S586 through S595, 
    S597 though S611, S620 through S623, S625, S628, S633, S641 through 
    S644, S646, S653, S658, S664, S665, and S667, installed, 
    certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each helicopter identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For helicopters that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must use the authority 
    provided in paragraph (e) to request approval from the FAA. This 
    approval may address either no action, if the current configuration 
    eliminates the unsafe condition, or different actions necessary to 
    address the unsafe condition described in this AD. Such a request 
    should include an assessment of the effect of the changed 
    configuration on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD. In no 
    case does the presence of any modification, alteration, or repair 
    (except for the repair of the abrasion strip) remove any helicopter 
    from the applicability of this AD.
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent loss of the abrasion strip from a main rotor blade 
    (blade) and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter, accomplish 
    the following:
        (a) Within the next 50 hours time-in-service (TIS), or within 90 
    calendar days after the effective date of this AD, whichever is 
    earlier, or prior to installing an affected replacement blade, and 
    thereafter at intervals not to exceed 50 hours TIS from the date of 
    the last inspection or replacement installation:
        (1) Visually inspect the adhesive bead around the perimeter of 
    each abrasion strip for erosion, cracks, or blisters.
        (2) Visually inspect the bond line between each abrasion strip 
    and each blade skin for voids, separation, or lifting of the 
    abrasion strip.
        (3) Inspect each abrasion strip for debonding or hidden 
    corrosion voids using a tap (ring) test as described in the 
    applicable maintenance manual.
    
    [[Page 46647]]
    
        (b) If any deterioration of an abrasion strip adhesive bead is 
    discovered, prior to further flight, restore the bead in accordance 
    with the applicable maintenance manual.
        (c) If abrasion strip debonding, separation, or a hidden 
    corrosion void is found or suspected, prior to further flight, 
    remove the blade with the defective abrasion strip and replace it 
    with an airworthy blade.
        (d) Repair of an affected blade's abrasion strip is considered a 
    terminating action for the requirements of this AD. Identify the 
    repaired blade with a white dot added adjacent to the blade S/N.
        (e) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, New York Aircraft Certification 
    Office, FAA. Operators shall submit their requests through an FAA 
    Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may concur or comment and then 
    send it to the Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office.
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the New York Aircraft Certification Office.
    
        (f) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the helicopter to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished, provided the 
    abrasion strip has not started to separate or debond from the main 
    rotor blade.
        (g) This amendment becomes effective on October 7, 1998.
    
        Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on August 21, 1998.
    Larry M. Kelly,
    Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
    [FR Doc. 98-23600 Filed 9-1-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
10/7/1998
Published:
09/02/1998
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
98-23600
Dates:
October 7, 1998.
Pages:
46645-46647 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 96-SW-10-AD, Amendment 39-10727, AD 98-18-11
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
98-23600.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13