94-23247. Louisiana Regulatory Program  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 181 (Tuesday, September 20, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-23247]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: September 20, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
    
    30 CFR Part 918
    
     
    
    Louisiana Regulatory Program
    
    AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM), 
    Interior.
    
    ACTION: Final rule; approval of amendment.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: OSM is approving, with additional requirements, a proposed 
    amendment to the Louisiana regulatory program (hereinafter referred to 
    as the ``Louisiana program'') under the Surface Mining Control and 
    Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). Louisiana proposed revisions to the 
    Louisiana Surface Mining Regulations (LSMR) pertaining to revegetation 
    success standards for tree and shrub stocking on lands with a 
    postmining land use of forestry. The amendment specifies revegetation 
    success standards for final bond release on reclaimed lands developed 
    for forestry.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: September 20, 1994.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    James H. Moncrief Telephone: (918) 581-6430.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    
    I. Background on the Louisiana Program
    
        On October 10, 1980, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally 
    approved the Louisiana program. General background information on the 
    Louisiana program, including the Secretary's findings, the disposition 
    of comments, and the conditions of approval of the Louisiana program 
    can be found in the October 10, 1980, Federal Register (45 FR 67340). 
    Subsequent actions concerning Louisiana's program and program 
    amendments can be found at 30 CFR 918.15 and 918.16.
    
    II. Proposed Amendment
    
        By letter dated May 3, 1994, Louisiana submitted a proposed 
    amendment to its program pursuant to SMCRA (administrative record No. 
    LA-348). Louisiana submitted the proposed amendment at its own 
    initiative. The provision of its regulatory program that Louisiana 
    proposed to revise was LSMR 53123.B.4.a, standards for success of 
    revegetation at final bond release on reclaimed lands developed for 
    forestry.
        In the May 26, 1994, Federal Register (59 FR 27252), OSM announced 
    receipt of the proposed amendment, provided an opportunity for a public 
    hearing or meeting on its substantive adequacy, and invited public 
    comment on its adequacy (administrative record No. 348.02). Because no 
    one requested a public hearing or meeting, none was held. The public 
    comment period ended on June 27, 1994.
        During its review of the amendment, OSM identified concerns 
    relating to the provisions of LSMR 53123.B.4.a, revegetation success 
    standards for tree and shrub stocking on lands with a postmining land 
    use of forestry. OSM notified Louisiana of the concerns by letter dated 
    July 11, 1994 (administrative record No. LA-348.10).
        In a letter dated August 16, 1994, Louisiana responded that (1) it 
    would not, at this time, submit revisions in response to OSM's July 11, 
    1994, issue letter, and (2) OSM should proceed with the publishing of 
    the final rule Federal Register notice (administrative record No. LA-
    348.11).
    
    III. Director's Findings
    
        As discussed below, the Director, in accordance with SMCRA and 30 
    CFR 732.15 and 732.17, finds, with additional requirements, that the 
    proposed program amendment submitted by Louisiana on May 3, 1994, is no 
    less effective than the requirements of the corresponding Federal 
    regulations. Accordingly, the Director approves the proposed amendment.
        1. LSMR 53123.B.4.a, Standards for Success of Revegetation at Final 
    Bond Release on Reclaimed Lands Developed for Forestry.
        a. Revegetation success standards for tree stocking and ground 
    cover. Louisiana proposed to revise LSMR 53123.B.4.a to require that 
    prior to final bond release there shall be 450 well-distributed free-
    to-grow live pine trees per acre of the same age or 250 well-
    distributed live hardwood trees per acre of the same age, and that 
    countable stems shall be a minimum of 3 years old. At proposed LSMR 
    53123.B.4.a, Louisiana defined ``well-distributed'' to mean uniform 
    stockings levels over an entire planting site, and ``free-to-grow'' to 
    mean pine seedlings or saplings without significant hardwood 
    competition, competing vegetation shades the pine's crown on less than 
    30 percent of the crown's circumference, and the pines are judged to 
    have better than a 90 percent chance of capturing a place in the crown 
    canopy.
        LSMR 53123.B.4.a, which OSM previously approved (October 28, 1992; 
    57 FR 48726; administrative record No. LA-350), requires that 
    vegetative ground cover shall not be less than 70 percent 
    (administrative record Nos. LA-321 and LA-350). Louisiana's existing 
    LSMR 53117.A.4, applicable to revegetation on land reclaimed for any 
    land use, requires that a vegetative cover be established that is 
    capable of stabilizing the soil surface from erosion. Therefore, the 
    requirement for 70 percent ground cover on land developed for forestry 
    is a minimum standard that must be increased if it is insufficient to 
    control erosion.
        Louisiana stated at proposed LSMR 53123.B.4.a that the tree 
    stocking and ground cover standards were developed after consultation 
    with and approval by the Louisiana Department of Agriculture and 
    Forestry. Louisiana submitted to OSM a letter, dated December 27, 1993, 
    from the Louisiana Office of Forestry, Department of Agriculture and 
    Forestry (administrative record No. LA-348.01). In it, the Office of 
    Forestry concurred with the technical success standards for areas 
    developed for forestry proposed at LSMR 53123.B.4.a.
        The Federal regulations at 30 CFR 816.116(b)(3)(i) and 
    817.116(b)(3)(i) require that minimum stocking and planting 
    arrangements shall be specified by the regulatory authority on the 
    basis of local and regional conditions and after consultation with and 
    approval by the State agencies responsible for the administration of 
    forestry and wildlife programs. Consultation and approval may occur on 
    either a programwide or a permit-specific basis.
        Because Louisiana proposed, at LSMR 53123.B.4.a, to specify the 
    minimum stocking and planting arrangements, and submitted approval by 
    the State agency responsible for the administration of forestry, 
    Louisiana has proposed programwide standards for all reclaimed land 
    with a designated postmining land use of forestry.
        The Director finds that proposed LSMR 53123.B.4.a is no less 
    effective than the requirements of the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 
    816.116(b)(3)(i) and 817.116(b)(3)(i), and approves it.
        b. Utility of trees for the approved postmining land use and tree 
    health. Louisiana proposed at LSMR 53123.B.4.a to delete the 
    requirements that the trees that will be used in determining the 
    success of stocking and the adequacy of the plant arrangement shall (1) 
    have utility for the approved postmining land use and (2) be healthy.
        The Federal regulations at 30 CFR 816.116(b)(3)(ii) and 
    817.116(b)(3)(ii) require (in part) that trees and shrubs that will be 
    used in determining the success of stocking and the adequacy of the 
    plant arrangement shall (1) have utility for the approved postmining 
    land use and (2) be healthy.
        Because Louisiana has deleted the State counterparts to the Federal 
    requirements, the Director finds that proposed LSMR 53123.B.4.a is less 
    effective than the requirements of the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 
    816.116(b)(3)(ii) and 817.116(b)(3)(ii). The Director requires that 
    Louisiana revise LSMR 53123.B.4.a to include these requirements.
        c. Length of time trees have been established. Louisiana proposed 
    at LSMR 53123.B.4.a to delete the requirement that, at the time of 
    final bond release, at least 80 percent of the trees and shrubs shall 
    have been in place for 60 percent of the 5-year responsibility period. 
    Louisiana proposed to require that (1) there shall be 450 well-
    distributed free-to-grow live pine trees per acre of the same age or 
    250 well-distributed live hardwood trees per acre of the same age and 
    (2) countable stems shall be a minimum of 3 years old.
        The Federal regulations at 30 CFR 816.116(b0(3)(ii) and 
    817.116(b)(3)(ii) require in part that, at the time of bond release, at 
    least 80 percent of the trees and shrubs used to determine such success 
    shall have been in place for 60 percent of the applicable minimum 
    period of responsibility (``80/60 requirement'').
        OSM interprets proposed LSMR 53123.B.4.a to require that 100 
    percent (i.e., all countable stems) of the trees must be in place for a 
    minimum of 60 percent of the responsibility period (i.e., 3 of the 5-
    year minimum period of responsibility). Under this interpretation, 
    proposed LSMR 53123.B.4.a is no less effective than the ``80/60 
    requirement'' in the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 816.116(b)(3)(ii) 
    and 817.116(b)(3)(ii). However, before OSM can make this determination, 
    Louisiana must clarify that this is its intent. Therefore, the Director 
    requires that Louisiana either (1) clarify, by policy statement, that 
    proposed LSMR 53123.B.4.a requires that 100 percent (i.e., all 
    countable stems) of the trees must be in place for a minimum of 60 
    percent of the responsibility period (i.e., 3 of the 5-year minimum 
    period of responsibility), or (2) revise proposed LSMR 53123.B.4.a to 
    add the requirement that at least 80 percent of the trees and shrubs 
    used to determine success of revegetation shall have been in place for 
    60 percent of the applicable minimum period of responsibility.
    
    IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
    
        Following are summaries of all substantive oral and written 
    comments on the proposed amendment that were received by OSM, and OSM's 
    responses to them.
    
    1. Public Comments
    
        OSM invited public comments on the proposed amendment, but none 
    were received.
    
    2. Federal Agency Comments
    
        Pursuant to 732.17(h)(11)(i), OSM solicited comments on the 
    proposed amendment from various Federal agencies with an actual or 
    potential interest in the Louisiana program (administrative record No. 
    LA-348.03).
        The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers responded on June 10, 1994, that 
    the proposed revisions were satisfactory (administrative record No. La-
    348.04).
        The U.S. Bureau of Mines responded on June 14, 1994, that it had no 
    comments (administrative record No. LA-348.05).
        The U.S. Forest Service responded on June 15, 1994, that, after 
    consulting the forest administrators in Louisiana, it had no comments 
    (administrative record No. LA-348.06).
        The U.S. Soil Conservation Service (SCS) responded on June 20, 
    1994, that (1) it concurred with the number of trees required for 
    successful revegetation of mined forest land, (2) it recommended a 
    ground cover of at least 75 percent to prevent unacceptable levels of 
    soil erosion, and (3) all gullies should be repaired and revegetated 
    prior to final bond release (administrative record No. 348.08).
        With respect to the SCS comment concurring with the number of trees 
    required to demonstrate revegetation success, as discussed in finding 
    No. 1.a, the Director is approving the standard for the tree stocking 
    rate proposed by Louisiana at LSMR 53123.B.4.a.
        With respect to the SCS comment concerning a recommended ground 
    cover of 75 percent, as discussed in finding No. 1.a, Louisiana's 
    requirement at LSMR 53123.B.4.a for 70 percent ground cover was 
    previously approved by OSM and is a minimum standard. The Federal 
    regulations of 30 CFR 816.116(b)(3)(iii) and 817.116(b)(3)(iii) 
    require, for areas to be developed for forestry, that vegetative ground 
    cover shall not be less than that required to achieve the approved 
    postmining land use. Louisiana, at LSMR 531117.A.4 (which is applicable 
    to revegetation on land reclaimed for any land use), requires that a 
    vegetative cover be established that is capable for stabilizing the 
    soil surface from erosion.
        LSMR 53117.A.4 is substantively identical to the requirements of 
    the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 816.111(a)(4) and 817.111(a)(4). In 
    addition, Louisiana requires at LSMR 53121.A that suitable mulch and 
    other soil stabilizing practices shall be used on all regraded and 
    topsoiled areas to control erosion, promote germination of seeds, or 
    increase the moisture content of the soil. LSMR 53121.A is no less 
    effective than the requirements of the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 
    816.114 and 817.114. Louisiana's standard for ground cover at LSMR 
    53123.B.4.a, in conjunction with the requirements at LSMR 53117.A.4 and 
    53121.A, is consistent with and no less effective in meeting SMCRA's 
    requirements than the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 816.116(b)(3)(iii) 
    and 817.116(b)(3)(iii). Therefore, the Director is not requiring that 
    Louisiana revise the standard for ground cover on areas to be developed 
    for forestry at LSMR 53123.B.4.a in response to this comment.
        With respect to the SCS comment that gullies should be repaired and 
    revegetated prior to final bond release, Louisiana's program at LSMR 
    53115 requires that (1) when rills and gullies deeper than 9 inches 
    form in areas that have been regarded and topsoiled, the rills and 
    gullies shall be filled, graded, or otherwise stabilized and the area 
    reseeded or replanted according to the requirements of LSMR 53117 
    through 53123, and (2) rills or gullies of lesser size be stabilized 
    and the area reseeded or replanted if the rills or gullies are 
    disruptive to the approved postmining land use or may result in 
    additional erosion and sedimentation. Therefore, because Louisiana's 
    approved program addresses the repair and revegetation of gullies, the 
    Director is not requiring that Louisiana revise LSMR 53123.B.4.a in 
    response to this comment.
        The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service responded on June 21, 1994, that 
    it had no objection to the proposed amendment (administrative record 
    No. 348.07).
    
    3. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Concurrence and Comments
    
        Pursuant to 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(ii), OSM is required to solicit 
    the written concurrence of EPA with respect to those provisions of the 
    proposed program amendment that relate to air or water quality 
    standards promulgated under the authority of the Clean Water Act (33 
    U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) or the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.).
        None of the revisions that Louisiana proposed to make in its 
    amendment pertain to air or water quality standards. Therefore, OSM did 
    not request EPA's concurrence.
        Pursuant to 732.17(h)(11)(i), OSM solicited comments on the 
    proposed amendment from EPA (administrative record No. LA-348.03). It 
    responded on July 8, 1994, that it had no comments (administrative 
    record No. LA-348.09).
    
    4. State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and the Advisory Council 
    on Historic Preservation (ACHP)
    
        Pursuant to 30 CFR 732.17(h)(4), OSM is required to solicit the 
    written comments of SHPO and ACHP with respect to those provisions of 
    the proposed program amendment that relate to historic properties.
        None of the revisions that Louisiana proposed to make in its 
    amendment pertain to historic properties. Therefore, OSM did not 
    request SHPO and ACHP comments.
    
    V. Director's Decision
    
        Based on the above findings, the Director approves with additional 
    requirements Louisiana's proposed amendment as submitted on May 3, 
    1994.
        With the requirement that Louisiana further revise its rules, the 
    Director approves, as discussed in finding Nos. 1.a through 1.c, LSMR 
    53123.B.4.a, concerning standards of success for revegetation on lands 
    developed for forestry.
        In accordance with 30 CFR 732.17(f)(1), the Director is also taking 
    this opportunity to clarify in the required amendment section at 30 CFR 
    918.16 that, within 60 days of the publication of this final rule, 
    Louisiana must either submit a proposed written amendment, or a 
    description of an amendment to be proposed that meets the requirements 
    of SMCRA and 30 CFR Chapter VII and a timetable for enactment that is 
    consistent with Louisiana's established administrative or legislative 
    procedures.
        The Federal regulations at 30 CFR Part 918, codifying decisions 
    concerning the Louisiana program, are being amended to implement this 
    decision. This final rule is being made effective immediately to 
    expedite the State program amendment process and to encourage States to 
    bring their programs into conformity with the Federal standards without 
    undue delay. Consistency of State and Federal standards is required by 
    SMCRA.
    
    VI. Procedural Determinations
    
    1. Executive Order 12866
    
        This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and 
    Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and 
    Review).
    
    2. Executive Order 12778
    
        The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required 
    by section 2 of Executive Order 12778 (Civil Justice Reform) and has 
    determined that this rule meets the applicable standards of subsections 
    (a) and (b) of that section. However, these standards are not 
    applicable to the actual language of State regulatory programs and 
    program amendments since each such program is drafted and promulgated 
    by a specific State, not by OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA 
    (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 12550) and the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 
    730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10), decisions on proposed State 
    regulatory programs and program amendments submitted by the States must 
    be based solely on a determination of whether the submittal is 
    consistent with SMCRA and its implementing Federal regulations and 
    whether the other requirements of 30 CFR Parts 730, 731, and 732 have 
    been met.
    
    3. National Environmental Policy Act
    
        No environmental impact statement is required for this rule since 
    section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency 
    decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not 
    constitute major Federal actions within the meaning of section 
    102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 
    4332(2)(C)).
    
    4. Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        This rule does not contain information collection requirements that 
    require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 
    3507 et seq.).
    
    5. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        The Department of the Interior has determined that this rule will 
    not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
    entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). 
    The State submittal that is the subject of this rule is based upon 
    counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was 
    prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a 
    significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small 
    entities. Accordingly, this rule will ensure that existing requirements 
    previously promulgated by OSM will be implemented by the State. In 
    making the determination as to whether this rule would have a 
    significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data and 
    assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.
    
    List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 918
    
        Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
    
        Dated: September 14, 1994.
    Russell F. Price,
    Acting Assistant Director, Western Support Center.
    
        For the reasons set out in the preamble, Title 30, Chapter VII, 
    Subchapter T of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as set forth 
    below:
    
    PART 918--LOUISIANA
    
        1. The authority citation for Part 918 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.
    
        2. Section 918.15 is amended by revising the section heading and 
    adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 918.15  Approval of amendments to the Louisiana regulatory 
    program.
    
    * * * * *
        (d) Revisions to LSMR 53123.B.4.a, revegetation success standards 
    for forestry, as submitted to OSM on May 3, 1994, are approved 
    effective September 20, 1994.
        3. Section 918.16 is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 918.16  Required program amendments.
    
        Pursuant to 30 CFR 732.17(f)(1), Louisiana is required to submit to 
    OSM by the specified date the following written, proposed program 
    amendment, or a description of an amendment to be proposed that meets 
    the requirements of SMCRA and 30 CFR Chapter VII and a timetable for 
    enactment that is consistent with Louisiana's established 
    administrative or legislative procedures.
        (a) By November 21, 1994, Louisiana shall revise LSMR 53123.B.4.a 
    or otherwise modify its program, to require that trees and shrubs that 
    will be used in determining the success of stocking and the adequacy of 
    the plant arrangement shall (1) have utility for the approved 
    postmining land use and (2) be healthy.
        (b) By November 21, 1994, Louisiana shall revise LSMR 53123.B.4.a 
    or otherwise modify its program, to either (1) clarify, by policy 
    statement, that proposed LSMR 53123.B.4.a requires that 100 percent 
    (i.e., all countable stems) of the trees must be in place for a minimum 
    of 60 percent of the responsibility period, or (2) add the requirement 
    that at least 80 percent of the trees and shrubs used to determine 
    success of revegetation shall have been in place for 60 percent of the 
    applicable minimum period of responsibility.
    
    [FR Doc. 94-23247 Filed 9-19-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4310-05-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
09/20/1994
Department:
Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement Office
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Final rule; approval of amendment.
Document Number:
94-23247
Dates:
September 20, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: September 20, 1994
CFR: (2)
30 CFR 918.15
30 CFR 918.16