98-25271. Relocation of the Digital Electronic Message Service  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 183 (Tuesday, September 22, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 50538-50539]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-25271]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
    
    47 CFR Part 2
    
    [ET Docket 97-99; FCC 98-155]
    
    
    Relocation of the Digital Electronic Message Service
    
    AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: With this Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Commission denies 
    Petitions for reconsideration of the Commission's order relocating the 
    Digital Electronic Message Service (DEMS) from the 18 GHz band to the 
    24 GHz band. In its decision, the Commission rejects petitioners 
    arguments that the Commission improperly applied the military and good 
    cause exemptions from notice and comment rulemaking, failed to address 
    the validity of the under DEMS licenses, failed to specify sufficient 
    reason to increase the amount of spectrum allocated for DEMS in the 24 
    GHz band and failed to consider the potential use of the 24 GHz band 
    for feeder links in conjunction with the Broadcast Satellite Service. 
    The Commission also amends Footnote US341 of the U.S. Table of 
    Allocations to reflect the current status of relevant radionavigation 
    facilities.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: November 23, 1998.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Taylor (202) 418-2113 of the 
    International Bureau.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's 
    Memorandum Opinion and Order in ET Docket No. 97-99; FCC 98-155, 
    adopted July 9, 1998 and released July 17, 1998. The complete text of 
    this Memorandum Opinion and Order is available for inspection and 
    copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room 
    239), 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., and also may be purchased 
    from the Commission's copy contractor, International Transcription 
    Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036, telephone: 
    202-857-3800, facsimile: 202-857-3805.
    
    Summary of Memorandum Opinion and Order
    
        1. This Memorandum Opinion and Order denies petitions for 
    reconsideration of the Commission's Order, FCC 97-95, 12 FCC Rcd. 4990 
    (1997), modifying Commission rules without public notice and comment 
    and relocating the Digital Electronic Message Service (DEMS), a 
    terrestrial point-to-multipoint microwave service, from the 18.82-18.92 
    GHz and 19.16-19.26 GHz bands (18 GHz band) to the 24 GHz band 
    (Relocation Order).
        2. In January and March 1997, the National Telecommunications and 
    Information Agency (NTIA), acting on behalf of the Department of 
    Defense, requested that the Commission protect military satellite 
    communications systems operating in the 18 GHz band in the Washington, 
    D.C. and Denver, CO areas from interference. NTIA stated that DEMS 
    licensees could cause interference to the Government systems and that 
    the relocation was essential to fulfill requirements for Government 
    military systems to perform satisfactorily. To facilitate a solution to 
    the interference problem, NTIA made 400 Megahertz of replacement 
    spectrum available at the 24.25-24.45 GHz and 25.05-25.25 GHz bands, 
    and suggested that the Commission expeditiously relocate DEMS without 
    notice and comment based upon the military and good cause exemptions to 
    the Administrative Procedure Act.
        3. Petitioners argue that the Commission improperly applied the 
    military and good cause exemptions from notice and comment rulemaking, 
    failed to address the validity of the underlying DEMS licenses, failed 
    to specify sufficient reason to increase the amount of spectrum 
    allocated for DEMS in the 24 GHz band and failed to consider the 
    potential use of the 24 GHz band for feeder links in conjunction with 
    the Broadcast Satellite Service.
        4. The Commission found that the decision to move all of DEMS from 
    the 18 GHz to the 24 GHz band nationwide was within the scope of the 
    military exemption to the notice and comment requirement because NTIA, 
    on the behalf of DOD, specifically requested that the Commission 
    protect government systems and relocate DEMS without notice and 
    comment. The Commission found that the exemption encompasses relocation 
    actions outside of Washington D.C. and Denver, CO. and that addressing 
    the interference problems in those two areas alone would preclude DEMS 
    in those areas because it is unlikely that 24 GHz equipment could be 
    manufactured at economic prices solely for the Washington, D.C. and 
    Denver, CO markets. Additionally, the Commission found that the good 
    cause exemption to the APA's notice and comment requirements provides 
    an independent source for the Commission's actions in the 18 GHz 
    Relocation Order and that the Relocation Order includes a sufficient 
    statement of ``good cause.''
        5. WebCel asserts the Commission failed to address issues raised in 
    Teledesic's withdrawn pleading, initially filed in September, 1996 but 
    withdrawn in March 1997, concerning the status of DEMS licenses now 
    relocated to 24 GHz pursuant to the Relocation Order. The Wireless 
    Telecommunications Bureau, Enforcement Division, investigated the 
    validity of the DEMS licenses issued to DSC and MSI and found no 
    violations of DEMS construction and operating requirements.
        6. When the Commission relocated DEMS from the 18 GHz band to the 
    24 GHz band, it allocated on a per channel basis four times the amount 
    of spectrum at 24 GHz as was allocated at 18 GHz. Petitioners 
    challenged this determination, arguing that the Commission's 
    assumptions regarding
    
    [[Page 50539]]
    
    typical cell size, service reliability, transmitter power and other 
    technical parameters were improper. The Memorandum Opinion and Order 
    rejects these technical contentions. Using comparable technology, DEMS 
    requires at least four times the amount of spectrum at 24 GHz to 
    provide equivalent service due primarily to less favorable radio 
    propagation characteristics.
        7. The Relocation Order allocated 5 channel pairs of 40 Megahertz 
    (400 Megahertz total) for DEMS at 24 GHz. MWCA asserts the incumbent 
    DEMS licensees would have a de facto monopoly because the DEMS 
    licensees have, or are requesting, virtually all of the available 
    channel pairs in each SMSA. The Memorandum Opinion and Order rejects 
    this claim, noting that the relocations did not alter the competitive 
    status quo but simply changed the frequency bands at which DEMS 
    operates. Further, additional channels remain to be licensed in many 
    areas
        8. Several petitioners question whether Section 309(j) of the 
    Communications Act requires the Commission to conduct competitive 
    bidding for the 24 GHz band. The Commission found that auctions are not 
    required, nor in the public interest, with respect to the licenses 
    affected by the 18 GHz Relocation Order. The DEMS licensees are 
    previously licensed service providers forced to relocate from 18 GHz to 
    24 GHz. Consequently, the Commission did not grant the DEMS licensees 
    initial licenses but instead modified existing licenses. The Commission 
    expects to address separately, through a future notice of proposed 
    rulemaking, the disposition by auction of unassigned DEMS spectrum at 
    24 GHz.
        9. Finally, at the time of the Relocation Order, the only 
    operations in the 24 GHz band in the United States were two 
    radionavigation radar facilities operated by the Federal Aviation 
    Administration. The facilities, located near Washington, D.C. and 
    Newark, New Jersey, were scheduled to be decommissioned January 1, 1998 
    and January 1, 2000, respectively. The Relocation Order added U.S. 
    Footnote US341 to the U.S. Table of Allocations to protect the FAA 
    operation in these two areas until decommissioning. Consistent with 
    this schedule, the facility in Washington, D.C. has been decommissioned 
    and the decommissioning date for the Newark, New Jersey station has 
    been advanced. In order to accurately reflect the current status we 
    amend US341 to state:
    
        Non-Government operations in the 24.25-24.45 GHz band must 
    provide protection to the FAA radionavigation radar facility at the 
    Newark International Airport, New Jersey, until the facility is 
    decommissioned. The Newark radar facility is scheduled to be 
    decommissioned by January 1, 1998. Protection will be afforded in 
    accordance with criteria developed by the NTIA and FCC.
    
    Ordering Clauses
    
        10. Accordingly, It is ordered that the Petitions for 
    Reconsideration of WebCel Communications, Inc., DirecTV Enterprises, 
    Inc. and BellSouth Corporation of the March 14, 1997 Relocation Order 
    are denied.
        11. It is further ordered that the Petition for Partial 
    Reconsideration filed by the Millimeter Wave Carrier Association, Inc. 
    is denied.
        12. It is further ordered that the Petitions for Reconsideration of 
    DirecTV Enterprises, Inc. and Bellsouth Corporation of the June 24, 
    1997 Modification Order are denied.
        13. It is further ordered that the Applications for Review of 
    WebCel Communications, Inc., and Millimeter Wave Carrier Association, 
    Inc., of the June 24, 1997 Modification Order are denied.
        14. It is further ordered that the Joint Motion for Leave to File 
    Surreply of Digital Services Corporation, Microwave Services Inc. and 
    Teligent, L.L.C., ET Docket No. 97-99, is granted and that WebCel 
    Communications, Inc., Opposition to Joint Motion for Leave to File 
    Surreply, ET Docket No. 97-99, is denied.
        15. It is further ordered that the Motion of WinStar 
    Communications, Inc. to withdraw its Petition for Clarification and its 
    Reply is granted.
        16. It is further ordered that Teledesic Corporation's request to 
    withdraw its Petition to Deny and Determine Status of Licenses, File 
    No. 9607682 et. al., is granted.
        17. It is further ordered that the Motions for Expedited Resolution 
    filed by Millimeter Wave Carrier Association, Inc. and WebCel 
    Communications, Inc., ET Docket No. 97-99, are dismissed.
    
    List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 2
    
        Communications equipment, Fixed service, Satellite.
    
    Federal Communications Commission.
    Magalie Roman Salas,
    Secretary.
    
    Rule Changes
    
        For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal 
    Communications Commission amends 47 CFR part 2 as follows:
    
    PART 2--FREQUENCY ALLOCATIONS AND RADIO TREATY MATTERS; GENERAL 
    RULES AND REGULATIONS
    
        1. The authority citation for part 2 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302, 303, 307 and 336, unless 
    otherwise noted.
    
    
    Sec. 2.106  [Amended]
    
        2. Amend Sec. 2.106 by revising the footnote following the table in 
    US341 to read as follows:
    * * * * *
        US341  Non-Government operations in the 24.25-24.45 GHz band must 
    provide protection to the FAA radionavigation radar facility at the 
    Newark International Airport, New Jersey, until the facility is 
    decommissioned. The Newark radar facility is scheduled to be 
    decommissioned by January 1, 1998. Protection will be afforded in 
    accordance with criteria developed by the NTIA and FCC.
    * * * * *
    [FR Doc. 98-25271 Filed 9-21-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
11/23/1998
Published:
09/22/1998
Department:
Federal Communications Commission
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
98-25271
Dates:
November 23, 1998.
Pages:
50538-50539 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
ET Docket 97-99, FCC 98-155
PDF File:
98-25271.pdf
CFR: (1)
47 CFR 2.106