99-24612. PA 23 Subcorridor: Lancaster County, Pennsylvania  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 183 (Wednesday, September 22, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 51364]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-24612]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Highway Administration
    
    
    PA 23 Subcorridor: Lancaster County, Pennsylvania
    
    AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of Intent.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that an 
    environmental impact statement will be prepared for the PA 23 
    Subcorridor in Earl Township, East Earl Township, East Lampeter 
    Township, Manheim Township, Upper Leacock Township, and New Holland 
    Borough, Lancaster County, Pennsylvania.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Deborah Suciu Smith, Environmental Specialist, Federal Highway 
    Administration, 228 Walnut Street, Room 536, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 
    17101-1720, Telephone: 717-221-3785, or Mark Malhenzie, Project 
    Manager, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation 2140 Herr Street, 
    Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 17103, Telephone 717-783-5080.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FHWA, in cooperation with the 
    Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) and the Lancaster 
    County Planning Office, will prepare an environmental impact statement 
    (EIS) to identify and evaluate alternatives which address 
    transportation problems within the PA 23 Subcorridor. The proposed 
    project would involve improvements to transportation conditions in the 
    PA 23 Subcorridor from the PA 23/U.S. Route 30 interchange on the west 
    to U.S. Route 322 on the east.
        A Notice of Intent was previously published in the Federal Register 
    on February 27, 1987, to advise the public that an EIS would be 
    prepared to identify and evaluate alternatives to provide a viable 
    means of relieving traffic congestion on PA 23 and U.S. Route 30 in 
    Lancaster County. Public concerns redirected the scope of the project 
    and a revised Notice of Intent was published on June 16, 1988. The 
    intent of the second Notice was to advise the public that separate 
    EIS's would be prepared to identify and evaluate alternatives to 
    relieve traffic congestion on PA 23 and U.S. Route 30 independently.
        In 1997, the Lancaster County Transportation Coordinating Committee 
    (Lancaster County MPO) was the lead agency for the PA 23 Corridor Major 
    Investment Study (MIS), consistent with the requirements of the 
    Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. The PA 23 
    Corridor Study MIS gathered various types of data which resulted in the 
    identification of transportation needs and will lead to the development 
    of alternatives. Typical areas of concern identified by various members 
    of the public and resource agencies during the MIS studies include, but 
    are not limited to, the following: socioeconomic and land use impacts; 
    the unique social sub-groups; effects on cultural, and natural 
    resources; agricultural preservation; roadway safety; business-
    industry; tourism; and economic stability.
        The PA 23 Corridor Study MIS demonstrated present and future 
    transportation problems in the PA 23 Subcorridor from U.S. Route 30 to 
    the U.S. Route 322 intersection east of New Holland, a distance of 
    approximately 21.5 km (13.4 miles). Transportation needs in the PA 23 
    Subcorridor include congestion, decreasing levels of service, traffic 
    diversion from PA 23 to local roads, uncontrolled access to adjacent 
    driveways and connecting roads, and a mix of motorized and non-
    motorized means of travel. Improvements to the corridor are considered 
    necessary to provide for the existing and projected transportation 
    demands.
        A range of transportation alternatives, including No-Build, 
    Transportation Systems Management (TSM), Traffic Control Measures 
    (TCM), and Travel Demand Management (TDM), Transit, Widening, and 
    Relocation alternatives will be developed consistent with land use 
    strategies to address the identified transportation needs. The 
    development of alternatives will be based on traffic demands, 
    engineering requirements, environmental and socioeconomic constraints, 
    the county's growth management plan, and public input. Public 
    involvement and inter-agency coordination will be maintained throughout 
    the development of the EIS.
        To insure that the full range of issues related to this proposed 
    action are addressed and that all significant issues are identified, 
    comments and suggestions are invited from interested parties. Comments 
    or questions concerning this proposed action and the EIS should be 
    directed to the FHWA at the addresses listed above.
    
    (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, 
    Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing 
    Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on 
    Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)
    
        Issued on: September 14, 1999.
    Deborah Suciu Smith,
    Environmental Specialist, Federal Highway Administration, Harrisburg, 
    Pennsylvania.
    [FR Doc. 99-24612 Filed 9-21-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-22-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
09/22/1999
Department:
Federal Highway Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of Intent.
Document Number:
99-24612
Pages:
51364-51364 (1 pages)
PDF File:
99-24612.pdf