96-23665. 1996 Changes to Patent Practice and Procedure  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 185 (Monday, September 23, 1996)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 49820-49868]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-23665]
    
    
          
    
    [[Page 49819]]
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    Part II
    
    
    
    
    
    Department of Commerce
    
    
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    Patent and Trademark Office
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    37 CFR Part 1, et al.
    
    
    
    1996 Changes to Patent Practice and Procedure; Proposed Rule
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 185 / Monday, September 23, 1996 / 
    Proposed Rules
    
    [[Page 49820]]
    
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    
    Patent and Trademark Office
    
    37 CFR Parts 1, 3, 5, and 7
    
    [Docket No. 960606163-6163-01]
    RIN 0651-AA80
    
    
    1996 Changes to Patent Practice and Procedure
    
    AGENCY: Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Patent and Trademark Office (Office) is proposing to amend 
    the rules of practice in patent cases to simplify the requirements of 
    the rules, rearrange portions of the rules for better context, and 
    eliminate unnecessary rules or portions thereof as part of a 
    government-wide effort to reduce the regulatory burden on the American 
    public. The procedure for filing of continuation and divisional 
    applications would be simplified. Another type of simplification being 
    proposed that would affect several rules is the acceptance of a 
    statement that errors were made without deceptive intent, unaccompanied 
    by any further showing of facts and circumstances. The naming of 
    inventors would no longer be required on filing of the application in 
    order to obtain a filing date, which would eliminate the need for 
    certain petitions to correct inventorship.
    
    DATES: Written comments must be received on or before November 22, 
    1996, to ensure consideration.
        Comments will be available for public inspection after receipt and 
    will be available on the Internet (address: [email protected]). 
    Commentators should note that since their comments will be made 
    publicly available, information that is not desired to be made public, 
    such as the address and phone number of the commentator, should not be 
    included in the comments. A public hearing will not be conducted.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent by mail message over the Internet 
    addressed to [email protected]
        Comments may also be submitted by mail addressed to: Box Comments--
    Patents, Assistant Commissioner for Patents, Washington, DC 20231, 
    Attention: Jeffrey V. Nase or by FAX to (703) 308-6916. Although 
    comments may be submitted by mail or FAX, the Office prefers to receive 
    comments via the Internet. Where comments are submitted by mail, the 
    Office would appreciate the comments to be electronically filed on a 
    DOS formatted 3\1/4\ inch disk along with a paper copy of the comments.
        The comments will be available for public inspection in Suite 520, 
    of One Crystal Park, 2011 Crystal Drive, Arlington, Virginia.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hiram H. Bernstein, by telephone at 
    (703) 305-9285 or by mail addressed to: Box Comments--Patents, 
    Assistant Commissioner for Patents, Washington, DC 20231 marked to the 
    attention of Mr. Bernstein or by FAX to (703) 308-6916.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposed rule change seeks to implement 
    President Clinton's program of reducing the regulatory burden on the 
    American public, which program is supported by the Office as published 
    in the Official Gazette on June 6, 1995. 1175 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 19, 
    20 and 22. The proposed changes are directed towards: (1) 
    Simplification of procedures for filing continuation and divisional 
    applications, establishing lack of deceptive intent in reissues, 
    petition practice, and in the filing of papers correcting improperly 
    requested small entity status; (2) elimination of unnecessary 
    requirements, such as certain types of petitions to correct 
    inventorship under Sec. 1.48; (3) removal of rules and portions thereof 
    that merely represent instructions as to the internal affairs of the 
    Office more appropriate for inclusion in the Manual of Patent Examining 
    Procedure (MPEP); (4) rearrangement of portions of rules to improve 
    their context; and (5) clarification of rules to aid in understanding 
    of the requirements that they set forth.
        The Office is particularly interested in comments as to whether the 
    proposed rules if adopted should be applied to already pending reissue 
    oaths or declarations under the new proposed standards of Sec. 1.175 as 
    it is to be amended under the final rule and already pending petitions 
    and papers under Secs. 1.28(c)(2), 1.48 and 1.324 as they are to be 
    amended under the final rule for such papers submitted prior to the 
    effective date of any final rule change, i.e., should the advantages 
    proposed by these suggested rule changes that are incorporated into the 
    final rule be applied retroactively to papers submitted prior to the 
    effective date of the final rule.
    
    Discussion of Specific Rules
    
        If Title 37 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 1, 3, 5 and 7 
    are amended as proposed:
        Section 1.4(d) paragraphs (1) and (2) would be amended to place the 
    current subject matter of both paragraphs into paragraphs (d)(1) (i) 
    and (ii) with a clarifying reference in paragraph (d)(1)(ii) to the 
    submission of a copy of a copy.
        Paragraph (d)(2) of Sec. 1.4 would be amended so that the 
    certifications set forth in the rule would be automatically made upon 
    presenting any paper to the Office by the party presenting the paper 
    and in an added paragraph (d)(3)(ii) identifying by the statute, 18 
    U.S.C. 1001 that sets forth the required standards of conduct. 
    Sanctions would be set forth in a Sec. 1.4(d)(3)(i) for violation of 
    the certifications in Sec. 1.4(d)(2) and for violations of the 
    standards of conduct in Sec. 1.4(d)(3)(ii).
        The proposed amendments to Sec. 1.4(d) would support proposed 
    amendments to Secs. 1.6, 1.8, 1.10, 1.27, 1.28, 1.48, 1.52, 1,55, 1.69, 
    1.102, 1.125, 1.137, 1.377, 1.378, 1.804, 1.805, (1.821 and 1.825 will 
    be reviewed at a later date in connection with other matters), 3.26, 
    and 5.4 that would delete the requirement for verification (MPEP 602) 
    of statements of facts by applicants and other parties who are not 
    registered to practice before the Office. The absence of a required 
    verification has been a source of delay in the prosecution of 
    applications, particularly where such absence is the only defect noted. 
    The proposed change to Sec. 1.4(d) would automatically incorporate 
    required averments thereby eliminating the necessity for a separate 
    verification for each statement of facts that is to be presented, 
    except for those instances where the verification requirement is 
    retained. Similarly, the proposed amendments to Sec. 1.4(d) would 
    support a proposed amendment to Secs. 1.97 (Secs. 1.637 and 1.673 will 
    be reviewed at a later date in connection with other matters) that 
    would change the requirements for certifications to requirements for 
    statements. The oath or declaration under Secs. 1.63 and affidavits 
    under Secs. 1.131 and 1.132 would not be affected. The requirement in 
    Sec. 5.25(a)(3) for a verified statement would be maintained, as the 
    required explanation must include a showing of facts (evidence), not 
    mere allegations, which will be weighed by the official deciding the 
    petition for retroactive license. The statements in Secs. 1.494(e) and 
    1.495(f) that verification of translations of documents filed in a 
    language other than English may be required would be maintained, as 
    such requirements are made rarely and only when deemed necessary (when 
    persons persist in translations which appear on their face to be 
    inaccurate, for example). The requirements for certification of service 
    on parties in Secs. 1.248, 1.510, 1.637 and 10.142 would be maintained.
    
    [[Page 49821]]
    
        Section 1.4 would also have a new paragraph (g) related to an 
    applicant who has not made of record a registered attorney or agent 
    being required to state whether assistance was received in the 
    preparation or prosecution of a patent application. This is proposed to 
    be transferred from Sec. 1.33(b) for consistent contextual purposes.
        Section 1.6 paragraph (e)(2) would be amended to remove the 
    requirement that the statement be verified in accordance with the 
    proposed change to Sec. 1.4(d)(2).
        Section 1.8 paragraph (b)(3) would be amended to remove the 
    requirement that the statement be verified in accordance with the 
    proposed change to Sec. 1.4(d)(2).
        Section 1.10 would be amended to remove the requirement for a 
    statement that is verified. See comments to Sec. 1.4(d). It is also 
    proposed to clarify the section by substitution of ``averring to the 
    fact'' with ``stating.''
        Section 1.14 would have the title and paragraphs (a) and (e) 
    amended to replace the term ``secrecy'' by ``confidence'' to conform to 
    the usage in 35 U.S.C. 122. Paragraph (a) of Sec. 1.14 would have a 
    reference to serial number changed to application number. Section 1.14 
    would also be amended to have paragraph (f) added to recognize the 
    proposed change to Sec. 1.47 (a) and (b) that are also exceptions to 
    maintaining pending applications in confidence by providing public 
    notice of the prospective issuance of a pending application to 
    nonsigning inventors.
        Section 1.17 (and Sec. 1.136(a)) would add a recitation to an 
    extension of time fee payment for a reply filed within a fifth month 
    after a nonstatutory or shortened statutory period for reply was set. 
    Section 1.17(a) is specifically proposed to be subdivided into 
    paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(5), with paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(4) 
    setting forth the amounts for one-month through four-month extension 
    fees proposed in Revision of Patent Fees for Fiscal Year 1997, 1186 
    Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 14 (May 7, 1996); 61 FR 19224 (May 1, 1996). 
    Paragraph (a)(5) would provide the small and other than small entity 
    amounts for the newly proposed fifth-month extension fee. Sections 1.17 
    (b), (c) and (d) are proposed to be removed as unnecessary in view of 
    proposed Sec. 1.17 (a)(1) through (a)(5).
        Fee levels, as proposed by the Revision of Patent Fees for Fiscal 
    Year 1997, were used in establishing the fifth-month extension of time 
    fees for large and small entities for paragraph (a)(5) of Sec. 1.17. A 
    shortened statutory period for reply of one month may be set, thereby 
    allowing a fifth month for reply within the six-month statutory period 
    for response. Section 1.17(a) is being amended to recognize the 
    availability of a fifth-month extension of time when a one-month or a 
    thirty-day shortened statutory period is set (e.g., in a written 
    requirement for restriction). The addition of a fifth-month would then 
    also become available for replies with nonstatutory periods of time 
    set, such as for replies to Notices to File Missing Parts of 
    Applications.
        Section 1.17(i), as proposed, would: add a petition fee under 
    Sec. 1.59 for expungement and return of papers, delete the references 
    to petitions under Secs. 1.60 and 1.62 to accord a filing date in view 
    of the proposed deletion of Secs. 1.60 and 1.62, and to change 
    ``divisional reissues'' to ``multiple reissue applications.'' Moreover, 
    Sec. 1.17, as well as Secs. 1.103, 1.112, 1.113, 1.133, 1.134, 1.135, 
    1.136, 1.142, 1.144, 1.146, 1.191, 1.192, 1.291, 1.294, 1.484, 1.485, 
    1.488, 1.494, 1.495, 1.530, 1.550, 1.560, (1.605, 1.617, 1.640, and 
    1.652 will be reviewed at a later date in connection with other 
    matters), 1.770, 1.785, (1.821 will be reviewed at a later date in 
    connection with other matters), and 5.3, would replace the phrases 
    ``response'' and ``respond'' with ``reply'' for consistency with 
    Sec. 1.111.
        Section 1.21(n), as proposed, would delete the reference to an 
    improper application under Secs. 1.60 or 1.62 in view of the proposed 
    deletion of Secs. 1.60 and 1.62.
        Section 1.26(a) is proposed to be amended to better track the 
    statutory language of 35 U.S.C. 42(d) by deleting ``[m]oney'' and 
    ``actual,'' adding ``fee'' and adding back language relating to refunds 
    of fees paid that were not ``required'' that was inadvertently dropped 
    in the July 1, 1993, publication of title 37 CFR, and from subsequent 
    publications.
        Section 1.27 (a) through (d) would be amended to remove the 
    requirement that a statement filed thereunder be ``verified.'' See 
    comments relating to Sec. 1.4(d). Section 1.27(b) is proposed to be 
    amended for clarification with the movement of a clause relating to 
    ``any verified statement'' within a sentence.
        Section 1.28(a) would be amended to remove the requirement for a 
    statement that is ``verified.'' See comments relating to Sec. 1.4(d).
        Section 1.28(a) would also be amended to provide that a new small 
    entity statement would not be required for reissue or continued 
    prosecution (Sec. 1.53(b)(3)) applications where small entity status is 
    still proper and reliance is had on a reference to a small entity 
    statement filed in a prior application or patent or a copy thereof is 
    supplied.
        Section 1.28(a) would be further amended to state that the payment 
    of a small entity basic statutory filing fee in a nonprovisional 
    continuing application, which claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119(e), 
    120, 121, or 365(c) of a prior application or in a continuing 
    prosecution application, or in a reissue application, wherein the prior 
    application or the patent has small entity status, will substitute for 
    the reference in the continuing or reissue application to the small 
    entity statement in the prior application or in the patent, thereby 
    establishing small entity status in such nonprovisional application.
        Section 1.28(a) is also amended to require a new determination of 
    continued entitlement to small entity status for continued prosecution 
    applications filed under Sec. 1.53(b)(3) and to clarify that the 
    refiling of applications as continuations, divisions and continuation-
    in-part applications and the filing of reissue applications also 
    require a new determination of continued entitlement to small entity 
    status prior to reliance on small entity status in a prior application 
    or patent.
        Section 1.28(c) would have the requirement removed for a statement 
    of facts explaining how an error in payment of small entity fees 
    occurred in good faith and how and when the error was discovered. A fee 
    deficiency payment based on the difference between fees originally paid 
    as a small entity and the current large entity amount at the time of 
    full payment of the fee deficiency will be deemed to constitute a 
    belief by the party submitting the deficiency payment that small entity 
    status was established in good faith and that the original payment of 
    small entity fees was made in good faith. Any paper submitted under 
    Sec. 1.28(c) will be placed in the appropriate file without review 
    after the processing of any check or the charging of any fee deficiency 
    payment specifically authorized.
        Section 1.33 would no longer provide that the required residence 
    and post office address of the applicant can appear elsewhere than in 
    the oath or declaration under Sec. 1.63. Section 1.63(a)(3) would be 
    amended to require that the post office address as well as the 
    residence be identified therein and not elsewhere. Permitting the 
    residence to be elsewhere in the application other than the oath or 
    declaration, as in current Sec. 1.33(a), is inconsistent with current 
    Sec. 1.63(c) that states the residence must appear in the oath or 
    declaration. The requirement for placement of the post office address 
    is proposed to be made equivalent to the requirement for the residence 
    to
    
    [[Page 49822]]
    
    eliminate confusion between the two, which often are the same 
    destination and are usually provided in the oath or declaration. The 
    reference in Sec. 1.33(a) to the assignee providing a correspondence 
    address has been moved within Sec. 1.33(a) for clarification. Other 
    clarifying language including a reference to Sec. 1.34(b), use of the 
    terms ``provided,'' ``furnished'' rather than ``notified,'' and 
    ``application'' rather than ``case,'' while ``of which the Office'' 
    would be deleted.
        Section 1.33(b) would be removed and the subject matter transferred 
    to new Sec. 1.4(g).
        Section 1.41(a) (and Sec. 1.53) would no longer require that a 
    patent be applied for in the name of the actual inventors for an 
    application for patent to receive a filing date. The requirement for 
    use of full names would be moved to Sec. 1.63(a) for better context. 
    The requirement for naming of the inventor or inventors would be 
    replaced with only a request that such names or an identifying name be 
    submitted on filing of the application. The use of very short 
    identifiers should be avoided to prevent confusion. Without supplying 
    at least an identifying name that is specific the Office may have no 
    ability or only a delayed ability to match any papers submitted after 
    filing of the application and before issuance of an identifying 
    Application number with the application file. Any identifier used that 
    is not an inventor's name must be specific, alphanumeric characters of 
    reasonable length, and must be presented in such a manner that it is 
    clear to application processing personnel what the identifier is and 
    where it is to be found. It is strongly suggested that applications 
    filed without an executed oath or declaration under Sec. 1.63 or 1.175 
    continue to use an inventor's name for identification purposes. Failure 
    to apprise the Office of the application identifier being used will 
    result in applicants having to resubmit papers that could not be 
    matched with the application and proof of the earlier receipt of such 
    papers where submission was time dependent.
        Paragraph (a) of Sec. 1.41 would also be amended to recite that the 
    actual inventor or inventors of an application are set forth in an 
    executed Sec. 1.63 oath or declaration to correspond to the proposed 
    change in Sec. 1.53(b)(1)(iii). Hence, the recitation of the 
    inventorship in an application submitted under Sec. 1.53(d) without an 
    executed oath or declaration for purposes of identification may be 
    changed merely by the later submission of an oath or declaration 
    executed by a different inventive entity without recourse to a petition 
    under Sec. 1.48.
        Section 1.47 would be amended to provide for publication in the 
    Official Gazette of a notice of filing for all applications submitted 
    under this section rather than only when notice to the nonsigning 
    inventor(s) is returned to the Office undelivered or when the address 
    of the nonsigning inventor(s) is unknown. The information to be 
    published includes: The Application number, filing date, invention 
    title and inventors identifying the missing inventor.
        Section 1.47 would also be amended for clarification purposes. A 
    reference to an ``omitted inventor'' in Sec. 1.47(a) would be replaced 
    with ``nonsigning inventor.'' Statements in Secs. 1.47 (a) and (b) that 
    a patent will be granted upon a satisfactory showing to the 
    Commissioner would be deleted as unnecessary. Section 1.47(b) is 
    proposed to be amended to clarify that it applies only where none of 
    the inventors are willing or can be found to sign the Declaration by 
    substitution of ``an inventor'' by ``all the inventors.'' The use of 
    ``must state'' in regard to the last known address would be deleted as 
    redundant in view of the explicit requirement for such address in the 
    rule. The sentence in Sec. 1.47(b) referring to the filing of the 
    assignment, written agreement to assign or other evidence of 
    proprietary interest would be deleted as redundant in view of the 
    requirement appearing earlier in Sec. 1.47(b) calling for ``proof of 
    pertinent facts.''
        Section 1.48 for inventorship corrections in an application 
    (Sec. 1.324, for inventorship corrections in a patent, and Sec. 1.175, 
    for reissue declarations) would no longer require factual showings to 
    establish a lack of deceptive intent. All that will be needed is a 
    statement to that effect.
        Section 1.48 would be amended in its title to clarify that the 
    section is related to patent applications as opposed to patents.
        Section 1.48(a) would not require correction of the inventorship if 
    the inventorship or other identification under Sec. 1.41 was set forth 
    in error on filing of the application. Section 1.48(a) is proposed to 
    be amended to apply only to correction of inventor or inventors from 
    that named in an originally filed executed oath or declaration and not 
    to the naming of inventors or others for identification purposes as is 
    currently proposed under Sec. 1.41. The statement to be submitted would 
    be required only from the person named in error as an inventor or from 
    the person who through error was not named as an inventor rather than 
    from all the original named inventors so as to comply with 35 U.S.C. 
    116. The present requirement that any amendment of the inventorship 
    under Sec. 1.48(a) be ``diligently'' made would be removed. The 
    applicability of a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(f)/(g) against an 
    application with the wrong inventorship set forth therein and any 
    patent that would issue thereon is deemed to provide sufficient 
    motivation for prompt correction of the inventorship without the need 
    for a separate requirement for diligence.
        A clarifying reference to Sec. 1.634 would be added in Sec. 1.48(a) 
    for instances when inventorship correction is necessary during an 
    interference and has been moved from Sec. 1.48(a)(4) for improved 
    contextual purposes.
        The Sec. 1.48(a)(1) statement would require a statement only as to 
    the lack of deceptive intent rather than a statement of facts to 
    establish how the inventorship error was discovered and how it 
    occurred, since the latter is proposed to be deleted. Additionally, the 
    persons from whom a statement is required now includes any person not 
    named in error as an inventor but limits statements from the original 
    named inventors to only those persons named in error as inventors 
    rather than all persons originally named as inventors including those 
    correctly named. The paragraph would be amended to remove the 
    requirement that the statement be verified in accordance with the 
    proposed change to Sec. 1.4(d)(2).
        Section 1.48(a)(2) would be amended for clarification purposes to 
    indicate the availability of Secs. 1.42, 1.43 or 1.47 in meeting the 
    requirement for an executed oath or declaration under Sec. 1.63 from 
    each actual inventor. Section 1.47 would only be applicable to the 
    person to be added as an inventor (inventors named in an application 
    transmittal letter can be deleted without petition). For those persons 
    already having submitted an executed oath or declaration under 
    Sec. 1.63, a petition under Sec. 1.183, requesting waiver of 
    reexecution of an oath or declaration, may be an appropriate remedy. 
    The requirement for an oath or declaration is maintained in 
    Sec. 1.48(a) notwithstanding its replacement in Sec. 1.324 for issued 
    patents by a statement of agreement or lack of disagreement with the 
    requested change in view of the need to satisfy the duty of disclosure 
    requirement in a pending application that is set forth in a Sec. 1.63 
    oath or declaration.
        Section 1.48(a)(4) would be amended to include a citation to 
    Sec. 3.73(b) to clarify the requirements for submitting a written 
    consent of assignee, which is subject to the requirement under 
    Sec. 3.73(b), and to delete the reference to an application involved in 
    an interference, which is being moved to
    
    [[Page 49823]]
    
    Sec. 1.48(a). Section 1.48(a)(4) would also be amended to clarify that 
    the assignee required to submit its written consent is only the 
    existing assignee of the original named inventors at the time the 
    petition is filed and not any party that would become an assignee based 
    on the grant of the inventorship correction.
        Section 1.48(b) would also be amended to remove the requirement 
    that a petition thereunder be diligently filed. The applicability of a 
    rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(f)/(g) against an application with the 
    wrong inventorship set forth therein and any patent that would issue 
    thereon is deemed to provide sufficient motivation for prompt 
    correction of the inventorship without the need for a separate 
    requirement for diligence.
        Section 1.48(b) would have a clarifying reference to Sec. 1.634 
    added for instances when inventorship correction is necessary during an 
    interference.
        Section 1.48(c) would be amended so that a petition thereunder no 
    longer need meet the current requirements of Sec. 1.48(a), which are 
    also proposed to be changed. A statement from each inventor being added 
    that the inventorship amendment is necessitated by amendment of the 
    claims and that the error occurred without deceptive intent would be 
    required under Sec. 1.48(c)(1) rather than the previous requirement of 
    a statement from each original named inventor. The previous 
    requirements under Sec. 1.48(a) for an oath or declaration, the written 
    consent of an assignee and the written consent of any assignee are 
    retained, but are now separately set forth in Secs. 1.48(c)(2) through 
    (c)(4). The particular circumstances of a petition under this 
    paragraph, adding an inventor due to an amendment of the claims that 
    incorporates material attributable to the inventor to be added, is seen 
    to be indicative of a lack of deceptive intent in the original naming 
    of inventors. Accordingly, all that must be averred to is that an 
    amendment of the claims has necessitated correction of the inventorship 
    and that the inventorship error existing in view of the claim amendment 
    occurred without deceptive intent. The current requirement for 
    diligence in filing the petition based on an amendment to the claims 
    would not be retained as applicants have the right, prior to final 
    rejection or allowance, to determine when particular subject matter is 
    to be claimed. Applicants should note that any petition under Sec. 1.48 
    submitted after allowance is subject to the requirements of Sec. 1.312, 
    and a petition submitted after final rejection is not entered as a 
    matter of right. The statement of facts must be a verified statement if 
    made by a person not registered to practice before the Patent and 
    Trademark Office.
        Section 1.48(c)(2) would clarify the availability of Secs. 1.42, 
    1.43 and 1.47 in meeting the requirement for an executed oath or 
    declaration under Sec. 1.63. Section 1.47 would only be applicable to 
    the person to be added as an inventor. For those persons already having 
    an executed oath or declaration under Sec. 1.63 a petition under 
    Sec. 1.183, requesting waiver of reexecution of an oath or declaration, 
    may be an appropriate remedy.
        Section 1.48(c)(4) would clarify that the assignee required to 
    submit its written consent is only the existing assignee of the 
    original named inventors at the time the petition is filed and not any 
    party that would become an assignee based on the grant of the 
    inventorship correction. A citation to Sec. 3.73(b) would be presented.
        Section 1.48(d) would be amended by addition of ``their part'' to 
    replace ``the part of the actual inventor or inventors'' and of 
    ``omitted'' to replace ``actual'' to require statements from the 
    inventors to be added rather than from all the actual inventors so as 
    to comply with 35 U.S.C 116. Section 1.48(d)(1) would also be clarified 
    to identify the error to be addressed is the inventorship error. It is 
    not expected that the party filing a provisional application will 
    normally need to correct an error in inventorship under this paragraph 
    by adding an inventor therein except when necessary under Sec. 1.78 to 
    establish an overlap of inventorship with a continuing application. 
    Automatic correction of the inventorship is not possible as is the case 
    for nonprovisional applications when an executed oath or declaration 
    under Sec. 1.63 with the correct inventorship is later filed; since an 
    oath or declaration is not to be submitted in provisional applications, 
    Sec. 1.51(a)(2).
        Section 1.48(d)(1) would be amended to remove the requirement that 
    the statement be verified in accordance with the proposed change to 
    Sec. 1.4(d)(2).
        Section 1.48(e)(1) would be amended to replace a requirement in 
    provisional applications that the required statement be one ``of 
    facts'' directed towards ``establishing that the error'' being 
    corrected ``occurred without deceptive intention,'' thereby requiring 
    only a statement that the inventorship error occurred without deceptive 
    intent. Paragraph (e)(1) would also be amended to remove the 
    requirement that the statement be verified in accordance with the 
    proposed change to Sec. 1.4(d)(2). It is not expected that the party 
    filing a provisional application would need to file a petition under 
    this paragraph since the application will go abandoned by operation of 
    law, Sec. 1.53(e)(2), and the need to delete an inventor will not 
    affect the overlap of inventorship needed to claim priority under 
    Sec. 1.78(a)(3) for any continuing application.
        Section 1.48(e)(3) would be amended to clarify that the assignee 
    required to submit its written consent is only the prior existing 
    assignee before correction of the inventorship is granted and not any 
    party that would become an assignee based on the grant of the 
    inventorship correction and a reference to Sec. 3.73(b) would be added.
        Section 1.48(f) would be added to provide that the later filing of 
    an executed oath or declaration would act to correct the inventorship 
    without a specific petition for such correction and would be used to 
    issue a filing receipt and process the application notwithstanding any 
    inventorship or other identification name earlier presented.
        Section 1.48(g) would be added to specifically recognize that the 
    Office may require such other information as may be deemed appropriate 
    under the particular circumstances surrounding a correction of the 
    inventorship.
        Section 1.51(c) covering the use of an authorization to charge a 
    deposit account is proposed to be removed as unnecessary in view of 
    Sec. 1.25(b).
        Section 1.52 paragraphs (a) and (d) would be amended to remove the 
    requirement that the translation be verified in accordance with the 
    proposed change to Sec. 1.4(d)(2). Paragraphs (a) and (d) of this 
    section would also be amended to clarify the need for a statement that 
    the translation being offered is an accurate translation, as is also 
    proposed in Sec. 1.69 paragraph (b).
        Section 1.53(b)(1), as proposed, would remove: (1) The phrase ``in 
    the name of the actual inventor or inventors as required by 
    Sec. 1.41,'' and (2) the sentence ``[i]f all the names of the actual 
    inventor or inventors are not supplied when the specification and any 
    required drawing are filed, the application will not be given a filing 
    date earlier than the date upon which the names are supplied unless a 
    petition with the fee set forth in Sec. 1.17(i) is filed which sets 
    forth the reasons the delay in supplying the names should be excused.'' 
    These proposed changes are consistent with the proposed change to 
    Sec. 1.41. Section 1.53(b)(1) (and Sec. 1.41(a)) would no longer 
    require that a patent be applied for in the name of the actual 
    inventors for an application for patent to receive a filing date.
        Section 1.53(b)(1), as proposed, would change (1) ``[a] 
    continuation or
    
    [[Page 49824]]
    
    divisional application (filed under the conditions specified in 35 
    U.S.C. 120, 121 or 365(c) and Sec. 1.78(a)) may be filed under this 
    section, Sec. 1.60 or Sec. 1.62'' and (2) ``[a] continuation-in-part 
    application may also be filed under this section or Sec. 1.62'' to (1) 
    [a] continuation or divisional application (filed under the conditions 
    specified in 35 U.S.C. 120, 121 or 365(c) and Sec. 1.78(a)) may be 
    filed under this paragraph or paragraph (b)(3) of this section'' and 
    (2) ``[a] continuation-in-part application must be filed under this 
    paragraph, respectively. Upon the deletion of Secs. 1.60 and 1.62, any 
    continuation-in-part applications must be filed under Sec. 1.53(b)(1), 
    but a continuation or divisional application may be filed under 
    Secs. 1.53(b)(1) or (b)(3).
        Section 1.53(b)(1), as proposed, would also add a new paragraph 
    (b)(1)(i) expressly providing that any continuation or divisional 
    application may be filed by all or by less than all of the inventors 
    named in a prior application, and that a newly executed oath or 
    declaration is not required pursuant to Secs. 1.51(a)(1)(ii) and 
    1.53(d) in a continuation or divisional application filed by all or by 
    less than all of the inventors named in a prior application, provided 
    that one of the following is submitted: (1) A copy of the executed oath 
    or declaration filed to complete (Sec. 1.51(a)(1)) the most immediate 
    prior national application for which priority is claimed under 35 
    U.S.C. 120, 121 or 365(c), or (2) a copy of an unexecuted oath or 
    declaration, and a statement that the copy is a true copy of the oath 
    or declaration that was subsequently executed and filed to complete 
    (Sec. 1.51(a)(1)) the most immediate prior national application for 
    which priority is claimed under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121 or 365(c). The 
    phrase ``most immediate prior national application'' is proposed rather 
    than ``prior application'' to accommodate those situations in which the 
    prior application was filed under current Secs. 1.60 or 1.62, or where 
    the prior application was itself a continuation or divisional 
    application and filed with a copy of the executed oath or declaration 
    from a prior application pursuant to Sec. 1.53(b)(1)(i). As is 
    currently the situation under Secs. 1.60 and 1.62, the applicant's duty 
    of candor and good faith including compliance with the duty of 
    disclosure requirements of Sec. 1.56 is continuous and applies to the 
    continuation, divisional or continued prosecution (Sec. 1.53(b)(3)) 
    application, notwithstanding the lack of a newly executed oath or 
    declaration. Therefore, applicants should be informed of the intent to 
    file a continuation, divisional or continued prosecution application 
    with a copy of the proposed claimed supplied. New Sec. 1.53(b)(1)(i), 
    as proposed, would also reference Sec. 1.53(d) for the filing of a 
    continuation or divisional application without the concomitant 
    submission of a newly executed oath or declaration or a copy of the 
    oath or declaration for the most immediate prior national application 
    for which priority is claimed under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121 or 365(c).
        Section 1.53(b)(1), as proposed, would also add a new paragraph 
    (b)(1)(i)(A) providing that the copy of the executed or unexecuted oath 
    or declaration for the most immediate prior national application for 
    which priority is claimed under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121 or 365(c) must be 
    accompanied by a statement from applicant, counsel for applicant or 
    other authorized party requesting the deletion of the names of the 
    person or persons who are not inventors in the continuation or 
    divisional application. Where the continuation or divisional 
    application and copy of the oath or declaration from the prior 
    application is filed without a statement from an authorized party 
    requesting deletion of the names of any person or persons named in the 
    prior application, the continuation or divisional application will be 
    treated as naming as inventors the person or persons named in the prior 
    application, taking into account any petition for correction of 
    inventorship pursuant to Sec. 1.48 in the prior application that has 
    been granted prior to the filing of the continuation or divisional 
    application. For situations where an inventor or inventors are to be 
    added in a continuation or divisional application see paragraph (ii) 
    under this section.
        The statement requesting the deletion of the names of the person or 
    persons who are not inventors in the continuation or divisional 
    application must be signed by person(s) authorized pursuant to 
    Sec. 1.33(a) to sign an amendment in the continuation or divisional 
    application. That is, such a statement must be signed by: (1) All of 
    the inventors in the continuation or divisional application (see MPEP 
    714.01(a)), (2) the assignee of record of the entire interest in the 
    continuation or divisional application in compliance with Sec. 3.73(b) 
    (see MPEP 324), (3) an attorney or agent of record, or (4) a registered 
    attorney or agent acting in a representative capacity pursuant to 
    Sec. 1.34(a).
        Section 1.53(b)(1)(i), as proposed, would add a new paragraph (B) 
    providing that where the power of attorney or correspondence address 
    was changed during the prosecution of the prior application, the change 
    in power of attorney or correspondence address must be identified in 
    the continuation or divisional application.
        Section 1.53(b)(1), as proposed, would add a new paragraph (ii) 
    providing that a newly executed oath or declaration must be filed in a 
    continuation or divisional application naming an inventor not named in 
    the prior application. For situations where an inventor or inventors 
    are to be added in a continuation or divisional application the Office 
    will not require a petition pursuant to Sec. 1.48, but will require 
    only the newly executed oath or declaration naming the correct 
    inventorship in the continuation or divisional application under 
    Sec. 1.53. For deletion of inventors in a continuation or divisional 
    application see Sec. 1.53(b)(1)(i) and (b)(3). New Sec. 1.53(b)(1)(ii), 
    as proposed, would also provide that a newly executed oath or 
    declaration must be filed in a continuation-in-part application, which 
    application may name all, more, or less than all of the inventors named 
    in the prior application.
        Section 1.53(b)(1)(iii), as proposed, would clarify that the 
    inventorship is not set forth in an application until an executed oath 
    or declaration is submitted therein in accordance with the proposed 
    change to Sec. 1.41(a). Where the inventorship was voluntarily set 
    forth on filing an application without an executed oath or declaration 
    pursuant to Sec. 1.53(d) for purposes of identification, the actual 
    inventorship of the application will be controlled by the later 
    submission of an executed oath or declaration which may change what was 
    originally identified as the inventorship without recourse to a 
    petition under Sec. 1.48 in accordance with the proposed change to 
    Sec. 1.41(a).
        Section 1.53(b)(2), as proposed, would remove the phrase ``in the 
    name of the actual inventor or inventors as required by Sec. 1.41'' and 
    the sentence ``[i]f all the names of the actual inventor or inventors 
    are not supplied when the specification and any required drawing are 
    filed, the provisional application will not be given a filing date 
    earlier than the date upon which the names are supplied unless a 
    petition with the fee set forth in Sec. 1.17(q) is filed which sets 
    forth the reasons the delay in supplying the names should be excused.'' 
    Section 1.53(b)(2) (and Sec. 1.41(a)) would no longer require that a 
    patent be applied for in the name of the actual inventors for an 
    application for patent to receive a filing date.
        Section 1.53(b)(2)(ii), as proposed, would change the phrase 
    ``treated as'' to ``converted to'' for clarity.
    
    [[Page 49825]]
    
        Section 1.53(b)(3) is proposed to be added to provide for the 
    filing of a continued prosecution application.
        Section 532 of the Uruguay Round Agreement Act (Pub. L. 103-465, 
    section 532, 108 Stat. 4809 (1994)) amended 35 U.S.C. 154 to provide 
    that the term of patent protection begins on the date of patent grant 
    and ends on the date 20 years from the filing date of the application. 
    As any delay in the prosecution of the application will reduce the term 
    of patent protection, reducing unnecessary delays in the prosecution of 
    applications is a mutual interest of patent applicants and the Office.
        An applicant in a nonprovisional application filed on or after June 
    8, 1995, must file a continuing application to obtain further 
    examination subsequent to a final rejection or other final action. The 
    current continuing practice under Secs. 1.60 and 1.62 of processing an 
    application filed thereunder with a new application number and filing 
    date delays the examination of such continuing applications. Therefore, 
    the Office proposes to eliminate this delay by: (1) Not assigning a new 
    application number to an application filed under Sec. 1.53(b) (3), and 
    (2) not processing the application filed under Sec. 1.53(b)(3) with a 
    filing date of the request for an application under Sec. 1.53(b)(3). 
    Rather, a continued prosecution application would retain the 
    application number and the filing date of the prior application to 
    which it relates for identification purposes thereby allowing 
    examination to proceed without the delays that would be caused by the 
    current need to assign to applications filed under Secs. 1.60 and 1.62 
    a new application number and filing date as of the date the Rule 60 or 
    62 application was requested (submitted).
        Section 1.53(b)(3), as proposed, would specifically provide that: 
    (1) In a complete nonprovisional application (Sec. 1.51(a)(1)) filed on 
    or after June 8, 1995, a continuation or divisional application that 
    discloses and claims only subject matter disclosed in that prior 
    complete application and names as inventors the same or less than all 
    the inventors named in that prior complete application may be filed 
    under this paragraph, and (2) the filing date of the continued 
    prosecution application, such as for continuity purposes under 35 
    U.S.C. 120 and Sec. 1.78, is the date on which a request for an 
    application under this paragraph, including identification of the prior 
    application number is filed.
        The specific reference to the prior application required by 35 
    U.S.C. 120 and Sec. 1.78(a)(2) will be satisfied by a sentence that the 
    continued prosecution application is a continuation or divisional, as 
    appropriate, of prior application number ##/###,###, filed ##/##/##, 
    now abandoned, notwithstanding that the so identified application 
    number and filing date are also the application number and filing date 
    assigned to the continued prosecution application under this paragraph. 
    Where the continued prosecution application derives from a chain of 
    Sec. 1.53(b)(3) applications assigned a common application number and 
    filing date, a sentence that the application is a continuation or 
    divisional, as appropriate, of the common application number and filing 
    date will constitute a specific reference (35 U.S.C. 120 and 
    Sec. 1.78(a)(2)) to each application assigned that application number 
    and filing date. Since Sec. 1.53(b)(3) is proposed to be limited to 
    continuations and divisionals, the actual filing date of the request 
    for an application under Sec. 1.53(b)(3) will be relevant only to the 
    copendency requirement of 35 U.S.C. 120 and Sec. 1.78 and patent term 
    vis-a-vis Pub. L. 103-465. Nevertheless, Sec. 1.53(b)(3) is proposed to 
    be limited to a continuation or divisional of a complete application 
    filed on or after June 8, 1995, so as to avoid any dispute as to 
    whether the application is subject to 20-year patent term as set forth 
    in Pub. L. 103-465. That is, any continuation or divisional of an 
    application filed prior to June 8, 1995, as well as any continuation-
    in-part, must be filed under Sec. 1.53(b)(1).
        Section 1.53(b)(3)(i)(A), as proposed, would provide that an 
    application under Sec. 1.53(b)(3) (a continued prosecution application) 
    will use the specification, drawings and oath or declaration from the 
    prior complete application and will be assigned its application number 
    for identification purposes.
        Section 1.53(b)(3)(i)(B), as proposed, would provide that the 
    filing of a request for a continued prosecution application is a 
    request to expressly abandon the prior application as of the filing 
    date granted the application under Sec. 1.53(b)(3).
        Section 1.53(b)(3)(i)(C), as proposed, would provide that a 
    continued prosecution application must be filed before the payment of 
    the issue fee, abandonment of, or termination of proceedings on the 
    prior application with the filing date of a request for a continued 
    prosecution application being the date on which a request for a 
    continued prosecution application including identification of the 
    application number of the prior complete application is filed.
        Section 1.53(b)(3)(ii) (A) and (B), as proposed, would provide that 
    filing fee for a continued prosecution application is the statutory 
    basic filing fee as set forth in Sec. 1.16 and any additional fee due 
    based on the number of claims remaining in the application after entry 
    of any amendment accompanying the request for an application under this 
    section and entry of any amendments under Sec. 1.116 unentered in the 
    prior application which applicant has requested to be entered in the 
    new application.
        In instances in which a continued prosecution application is 
    submitted without the basic statutory filing fee or any additional 
    claims fee due, the Office will continue to mail a ``Notice of Missing 
    Parts'' under Sec. 1.53(d)(1) and give the applicant a period of time 
    within which to file the fee and to pay the surcharge under 
    Sec. 1.16(e) to prevent abandonment of the application (see 
    Sec. 1.53(d)(1)). Thus, the filing of a continued prosecution 
    application without the basic statutory filing fee or any additional 
    claims fee due will result in a delay in the initial processing of the 
    application. An applicant, however, may eliminate or limit this delay 
    by either filing the request for a continued prosecution application 
    with the appropriate filing fee or not delaying the submission of the 
    appropriate filing fee until the mailing of or expiration of the period 
    for response to the ``Notice of Missing Parts.''
        Section 1.53(b)(3)(iii), as proposed, would provide that if a 
    continued prosecution application is filed by less than all the 
    inventors named in the prior application, a statement must accompany 
    the application when filed requesting deletion of the names of the 
    person or persons who are not inventors of the invention being claimed 
    in the continued prosecution application. Where an application is filed 
    under Sec. 1.53(b)(3) without a statement requesting deletion of the 
    names of any person or persons named in the prior application, the 
    application will be treated as naming as inventors the person or 
    persons named in the prior application, taking into account any grant 
    of a petition correcting inventorship in the prior application pursuant 
    to Sec. 1.48. To correct the inventorship in the continued prosecution 
    application, the Office will not require a petition pursuant to 
    Sec. 1.48 as the application is to be filed without a newly executed 
    oath or declaration, but will require only a newly executed oath or 
    declaration naming the correct inventorship in the continued
    
    [[Page 49826]]
    
    prosecution application, which is similar to the requirements for 
    correction of the inventorship in applications filed under 
    Sec. 1.53(b)(1) without a newly executed oath or declaration.
        Section 1.53(b)(3)(iv), as proposed, would require that any new 
    change be made in the form of an amendment to the prior application, 
    and would provide that any new specification filed with the request for 
    an application under Sec. 1.53(b)(3) would not be considered part of 
    the original application papers, but would be treated as a substitute 
    specification in accordance with Sec. 1.125. In the event that 
    legislation mandating the 18-month publication of patent applications 
    (e.g., H.R. 1733) is enacted, it will be necessary to amend proposed 
    Sec. 1.53(b)(3)(iii) to require a substitute specification in 
    compliance with Sec. 1.125 and drawings including only those changes to 
    the prior application during the prosecution of the prior application.
        Section 1.53(b)(3)(v), as proposed, would provide that the filing 
    of a continued prosecution application will be construed to include a 
    waiver of confidence by the applicant under 35 U.S.C. 122 to the extent 
    that any member of the public who is entitled under the provisions of 
    Sec. 1.14 to access to, or information concerning either the prior 
    application or any application filed under the provisions of 
    Sec. 1.53(b)(3) may be given similar access to, or similar information 
    concerning, the other application(s) in the file wrapper.
        Section 1.53(b)(3)(vi) (A) through (D), as proposed, would provide 
    that the applicant is urged to furnish in the request for an 
    application under Sec. 1.53(b)(3) the following information relating to 
    the prior application to the best of his or her ability: (A) Title as 
    originally filed and as last amended, (B) name of applicant as 
    originally filed and as last amended, (C) current correspondence 
    address of applicant, and (D) identification of prior foreign 
    application and any priority claim under 35 U.S.C. 119.
        Section 1.53(b)(3)(vii), as proposed, would provide that envelopes 
    containing only requests and fees for filing an application under 
    Sec. 1.53(b)(3) should be marked ``Box CPA.''
        Section 1.53(c), as proposed, would replace its current language 
    with three paragraphs treating: (1) Applications found to be improper 
    or incomplete, (2) any requests for review of a notification that an 
    application has been found to be improper or incomplete, and (3) 
    termination of proceedings in an application for failure to timely 
    correct a filing error or seek review of a notification that an 
    application has been found to be improper or incomplete.
        Section 1.53(c)(1), as proposed, would specifically provide that 
    ``[i]f any application filed under paragraph (b) of this section is 
    found to be incomplete or improper, applicant will be so notified and 
    given a time period within which to correct the filing error.''
        Section 1.53(c)(2), as proposed, would specifically provide that 
    ``[a]ny request for review of a notification pursuant to paragraph 
    (c)(1) of this section, or a notification that the original application 
    papers lack a portion of the specification or drawing(s), must be by 
    way of a petition pursuant to this paragraph,'' ``[a]ny petition under 
    this paragraph must be accompanied by the fee set forth in Sec. 1.17(i) 
    in an application filed under paragraphs (b)(1) or (b)(3) of this 
    section, and the fee set forth in Sec. 1.17(q) in an application filed 
    under paragraph (b)(2) of this section,'' and ``[i]n the absence of a 
    timely (Sec. 1.181(f)) petition pursuant to this paragraph, the filing 
    date of an application in which the applicant was notified of a filing 
    error pursuant to paragraph (c)(1) of this section will be the date the 
    filing error is corrected.''
        Section 1.53(c)(3), as proposed, would specifically provide that 
    ``[i]f an applicant is notified of a filing error pursuant to paragraph 
    (c)(1) of this section, but fails to correct the filing error within 
    the given time period or otherwise timely (Sec. 1.181(f)) take action 
    pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of this section, proceedings in the 
    application will be considered terminated'' and ``[w]here proceedings 
    in an application are terminated pursuant to this paragraph, the 
    application may be returned or otherwise disposed of, and any filing 
    fees, less the handling fee set forth in Sec. 1.21(n), will be 
    refunded.'' Section 1.53(c)(3), as proposed would not provide that 
    proceedings in the application will be considered terminated for 
    failure to timely respond to a notification that the original 
    application papers lack a portion of the specification or drawing(s). 
    Thus, the failure to timely seek review of a notification that the 
    original application papers lack a portion of the specification or 
    drawing(s) will not result in termination of proceedings in (or 
    abandonment of) the application, but will simply result in such portion 
    of the specification or drawing(s) not being considered part of the 
    original disclosure of the application.
        Section 1.53(d)(1), as proposed, would change ``paragraph (b)(1) of 
    this section'' to ``paragraphs (b)(1) or (b)(3) of this section,'' such 
    that Sec. 1.53(d)(1) would be applicable to applications filed under 
    Secs. 1.53 (b)(1) and (b)(3), where Sec. 1.53(d)(2) would be applicable 
    to applications filed under Sec. 1.53(b)(2) (i.e., provisional 
    applications). While Sec. 1.53(d)(1) addresses both the filing fee and 
    the oath or declaration, the oath or declaration of an application 
    under Sec. 1.53(b)(3) will be the oath or declaration of the prior 
    complete (Sec. 1.51(a)(1)) application. As such, an oath or declaration 
    will not be required under Sec. 1.53(d)(1) for a proper application 
    under Sec. 1.53(b)(3).
        Section 1.53(d)(1), as proposed, would be further amended to add 
    the phrases ``including a continuation, divisional, or continuation-in-
    part application'' and ``pursuant to Secs. 1.63 or 1.175, which may be 
    a copy of the executed oath or declaration filed to complete 
    (Sec. 1.51(a)(1)) the most immediate prior national application for 
    which priority is claimed under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121 or 365(c), or a copy 
    of an unexecuted oath or declaration, and a statement that the copy is 
    a true copy of the oath or declaration that was subsequently executed 
    and filed to complete (Sec. 1.51(a)(1)) the most immediate prior 
    national application for which priority is claimed under 35 U.S.C. 120, 
    121 or 365(c), in a continuation or divisional application'' for 
    clarity and consistency with Sec. 1.53(b)(1). A reference to submission 
    of a copy of a Notice to File Missing Parts would be removed.
        Section 1.54(b), as proposed, would add the phrase ``unless the 
    application is an application filed under Sec. 1.53(b)(3).'' To 
    minimize application processing delays in applications filed under 
    Sec. 1.53(b)(3), as proposed, such applications will not be processed 
    by the Office of Initial Patent Examination as new applications.
        Section 1.55 paragraph (a) would be amended to remove the 
    requirement that the statement be verified in accordance with the 
    proposed change to Sec. 1.4(d)(2).
        Section 1.59 would be amended: By revising the title to indicate 
    that expungement of information from an application file would come 
    under this section, by revising the existing paragraph and designating 
    it as paragraph (a)(1), and by adding paragraphs (a)(2), (b) and (c). 
    Paragraph (a)(1) would retain the general prohibition on the return of 
    information submitted in an application which has a filing date. The 
    portion of the paragraph relating to the Office furnishing copies of 
    application papers has been shifted to new paragraph (c). Paragraph 
    (a)(2) would make explicit that information, forming part of the 
    original disclosure, i.e., written
    
    [[Page 49827]]
    
    specification, drawings, claims and any preliminary amendment 
    specifically incorporated into an executed oath or declaration under 
    Secs. 1.63 and 1.175, will not be expunged from the application file.
        Paragraph (b) of Sec. 1.59 would provide an exception to the 
    general prohibition of paragraph (a) on the expungement and return of 
    information and would allow for such when it is established to the 
    satisfaction of the Commissioner that the requested expungement and 
    return is appropriate.
        Paragraph (b) of Sec. 1.59 is intended to cover the current 
    practice set forth in MPEP 724.05 where the submitted information has 
    initially been identified as trade secret, proprietary, and/or subject 
    to a protective order and where applicant may file a petition for its 
    expungement and return that will be granted upon a determination by the 
    examiner that the information is not material to patentability. Any 
    such petition should be submitted in response to an Office action 
    closing prosecution so that the examiner can make a determination of 
    materiality based on a closed record. Any petition submitted earlier 
    than close of prosecution may be returned unacted upon. In the event 
    pending legislation for pre-grant publication of applications, which 
    provides public access to the application file, is enacted, then the 
    timing of petition submissions under this section will be reconsidered. 
    A result of the proposed amendment to this section would be to have a 
    petition to expunge decided under the instant rule by the examiner who 
    determines the materiality of the information to be expunged rather 
    than by the Office of Petitions under Sec. 1.182, which prior to 
    rendering a decision on the petition consults with the examiner on 
    materiality of the information at issue.
        Paragraph (b) of Sec. 1.59 is also intended to cover information 
    that was unintentionally submitted in an application, provided that: 
    (i) The Office can effect such return prior to the issuance of any 
    patent on the application in issue, (ii) that it is stated that the 
    information submitted was unintentionally submitted and the failure to 
    obtain its return would cause irreparable harm to the party who 
    submitted the information or to the party in interest on whose behalf 
    the information was submitted, (iii) the information has not otherwise 
    been made public, (iv) there is a commitment on the part of the 
    petitioner to retain such information for the period of any patent with 
    regard to which such information is submitted, and (v) it is 
    established to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the 
    information to be returned is not material information under Sec. 1.56. 
    Requests to return information that have not been clearly identified as 
    information that may be later subject to such request by marking and 
    placement in a separate sealed envelope or container shall be treated 
    on a case-by-case basis. It should be noted that the Office intends to 
    start electronic scanning of all papers filed in an application, and 
    the practicality of expungement from the electronic file created by a 
    scanning procedure is not as yet determinable. Applicants should also 
    note that unidentified information that is a trade secret, proprietary, 
    or subject to a protective order that is submitted in an Information 
    Disclosure Statement may inadvertently be placed in an Office prior art 
    search file by the examiner due to the lack of such identification and 
    may not be retrievable.
        Paragraph (b) of Sec. 1.59 is also intended to cover the situation 
    where an unintended heading has been placed on papers so that they are 
    present in an incorrect application file. In such situation, a petition 
    should request return of the papers rather than transfer of the papers 
    to the correct application file. The grant of such a petition will be 
    governed by the factors enumerated above in regard to the unintentional 
    submission of information. Where the Office can determine the correct 
    application file that the papers were actually intended for, based on 
    identifying information in the heading of the papers, e.g., Application 
    number, filing date, title of invention and inventor(s) name(s), the 
    Office will transfer the papers to the correct application file for 
    which they were intended without need of a petition.
        Added paragraph (c) of Sec. 1.59 retains the practice that copies 
    of application papers will be furnished by the Office upon request and 
    payment of the cost for supplying such copies.
        Section 1.60 is proposed to be removed and reserved.
        In the notice of proposed rulemaking entitled ``Changes to 
    Implement 20-Year Patent Term and Provisional Application'' (20-Year 
    Term Notice of Proposed Rulemaking) published in the Federal Register 
    at 59 FR 63951 (December 12, 1994), and in the Patent and Trademark 
    Office Official Gazette at 1170 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 377 (January 3, 
    1995), Sec. 1.60 was proposed to be removed due to the rule change to 
    Sec. 1.4(d), which permits the filing of a copy of an oath or 
    declaration. The proposed removal of Sec. 1.60 in the 20-Year Term 
    Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, however, was withdrawn in the final rule 
    to permit further study.
        A continuation or divisional application may be filed under 35 
    U.S.C. 111(a) using the procedures set forth in Sec. 1.53, by providing 
    a copy of the prior application, including a copy of the oath or 
    declaration in such prior application, as filed. The patent statutes 
    and rules of practice do not require that an oath or declaration 
    include a recent date of execution, and the Examining Corps has been 
    directed not to object to an oath or declaration as lacking either a 
    recent date of execution or any date of execution. This change in 
    examining practice will appear in the next revision of the MPEP. As 
    discussed supra, the applicant's duty of candor and good faith 
    including compliance with the duty of disclosure requirements of 
    Sec. 1.56 is continuous and applies to the continuing application.
        Sections 1.60(b)(4) and 1.62(a) currently permit the filing of a 
    continuation or divisional application by all or by less than all of 
    the inventors named in a prior application without a newly executed 
    oath or declaration. To continue this practice, Sec. 1.53 is proposed 
    to be amended to provide that any continuation or divisional 
    application may be filed by all or by less than all of the inventors 
    named in a prior application, but where a newly executed oath or 
    declaration is not submitted for a continuation or divisional 
    application filed by less than all the inventors named in the prior 
    application, the copy of the oath or declaration for the most immediate 
    prior national application for which priority is claimed under 35 
    U.S.C. 120, 121 or 365(c) must be accompanied by a statement requesting 
    the deletion of the names of the person or persons who are not 
    inventors in the continuation or divisional application. A newly 
    executed oath or declaration will continue to be required in a 
    continuation or divisional application naming an inventor not named in 
    the prior application, or a continuation-in-part application.
        Section 1.60 is now unnecessary due to: (1) The rule change to 
    Sec. 1.4(d), (2) the proposed addition of Sec. 1.53(b)(1)(i) to 
    expressly permit the filing of either a newly executed oath or 
    declaration, or a copy of the executed oath or declaration filed to 
    complete pursuant to Sec. 1.51(a)(1) the most immediate prior national 
    application for which priority is claimed under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121 or 
    365(c), in a continuation or divisional application, (3) the proposed 
    addition of Sec. 1.53(b)(1)(i) to permit the filing of a continuation 
    or divisional application by all or by less than all the inventors
    
    [[Page 49828]]
    
    named in a prior application, using a copy of the executed oath or 
    declaration filed to complete the prior application, and (4) the 
    proposed addition of Sec. 1.53(b)(3) to permit the filing of a 
    continued prosecution application.
        A new application containing a copy of an oath or declaration under 
    Sec. 1.63 referring to an attached specification is indistinguishable 
    from a continuation or divisional application containing a copy of an 
    oath or declaration from a prior application submitted pursuant to 
    Sec. 1.53(b)(1)(i), as proposed. Unless an application is submitted 
    with a statement that the application is a continuation or divisional 
    application (Sec. 1.78(a)(2)), the Office will process such a new 
    application without requiring a new oath or declaration. Applicants are 
    advised to clearly designate any continuation or divisional application 
    as such to avoid the issuance of a filing receipt that does not 
    indicate that the application is a continuation or division.
        Section 1.62 is proposed to be removed and reserved.
        In the proposed rulemaking entitled ``Changes to Implement 18-Month 
    Publication of Patent Applications'' (18-Month Publication Notice of 
    Proposed Rulemaking) published in the Federal Register at 60 FR 42352 
    (August 15, 1995), and in the Patent and Trademark Office Official 
    Gazette at 1177 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 61 (August 15, 1995), 
    Sec. 1.62(e) was proposed to be amended to require a substitute 
    specification in compliance with Sec. 1.125 and drawings where the 
    application filed under Sec. 1.62 is a continuation-in-part 
    application. The 18-Month Publication Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 
    proposed to digital image and/or optical character recognition (OCR) 
    scan application material into an electronic data base, which data base 
    would be used to publish the application (e.g., for producing copies of 
    the technical contents of the application-as-filed). The 18-Month 
    Publication Notice of Proposed Rulemaking indicated that as 
    applications filed prior to the implementation of 18-month publication 
    will not have been image- or OCR-scanned into the electronic data base, 
    the technical contents of an application filed under Sec. 1.62 in which 
    the prior application was itself filed prior to the implementation of 
    18-month publication will not be contained in the electronic data base.
        The solution proposed in the 18-Month Publication Notice of 
    Proposed Rulemaking was for the Office to obtain the microfiche copy of 
    the prior application for applications under Sec. 1.62 which do not add 
    additional disclosure (i.e., continuation or divisional applications) 
    and image or OCR scan it into the electronic data base, and to amend 
    Sec. 1.62 to provide that, where the application adds additional 
    disclosure (i.e., is a continuation-in-part application), a substitute 
    specification in compliance with Sec. 1.125 and drawings will be 
    required.
        The proposal in the 18-Month Publication Notice of Proposed 
    Rulemaking to obtain the microfiche copy of prior continuation or 
    divisional applications is now considered unfeasible. A number of 
    applications filed under Sec. 1.62 derive from a chain of applications 
    filed under Sec. 1.62. The information pertaining to such an 
    application's chain of prior applications contained within the Patent 
    Application Location and Monitoring (PALM) system is not sufficiently 
    comprehensive to readily and reliably indicate the prior application 
    that contains a specification and drawings, and is not sufficiently 
    reliable to avoid the occasional inclusion of an unrelated application 
    in the chain of prior applications. This could result in the 
    inadvertent publication of the specification and drawings of the wrong 
    application.
        In addition, the microfiche copy of the prior application may be a 
    microfiche of sheets of specification and/or drawings on 8\1/2\ by 14-
    inch paper, which paper size is not technically useable by the 
    equipment which will be employed for pre-grant publication of patent 
    applications. Attempts to reduce such sheets of specification and/or 
    drawings to a paper size processible by pre-grant publication equipment 
    results in electronic files which contain illegible text and figures. 
    Moreover, the microfilming process under pre-grant publication differs 
    from the previous microfilming process, and as such, the microfiche 
    copy of such a prior application is sufficiently dissimilar from the 
    microfiche copy of an application under pre-grant publication that it 
    causes accurate technical date capture difficulties.
        In the event that legislation mandating the 18-month publication of 
    patent application is enacted, it will be necessary to require a 
    substitute specification in compliance with Sec. 1.125 and drawings 
    including any changes to the prior application during the prosecution 
    of the prior application or pursuant to Sec. 1.62(e) to continue 
    Sec. 1.62 practice.
        Section 1.62 is now unnecessary due to: (1) The rule change to 
    Sec. 1.4(d), (2) the proposed change to Sec. 1.53(b)(1) to expressly 
    permit the filing of either a newly executed oath or declaration, or a 
    copy of the executed oath or declaration filed to complete pursuant to 
    Sec. 1.51(a)(1) the most immediate prior national application for which 
    priority is claimed under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121 or 365(c), in a 
    continuation or divisional application, (3) the proposed change to 
    Sec. 1.53(b)(1) to permit the filing of a continuation or divisional 
    application by all or by less than all the inventors named in a prior 
    application, using a copy of the executed oath or declaration filed to 
    complete the prior application, and (4) the proposed addition of 
    Sec. 1.53(b)(3) to permit the filing of a continued prosecution 
    application.
        The Office currently receives a number of petitions requesting that 
    an application filed under Secs. 1.60 and 1.62 be accepted even though 
    at the time of filing of the application, the application did not 
    comply with all the requirements of Secs. 1.60 or 1.62 due to 
    inadvertent error on the part of the applicant. The examination of 
    these improper applications under Secs. 1.60 and 1.62 is delayed until 
    a petition to accept the application is filed and granted. The large 
    majority of the applications filed under Sec. 1.60, however, complied 
    at the time of filing with the requirements of Sec. 1.53(b)(1), and the 
    copy of the oath or declaration from the prior application is now 
    acceptable as the oath or declaration for the application, regardless 
    of whether the application is an application under Sec. 1.53 or 
    Sec. 1.60. The removal of Sec. 1.60 and simplification of Sec. 1.62 
    will reduce the number of these types of petitions and will simplify 
    the procedures for filing an application for both the Office and patent 
    practitioners.
        It is anticipated that, subsequent to the removal of Secs. 1.60 and 
    1.62, applications purporting to be applications filed under Secs. 1.60 
    or 1.62 will be filed until the deletion of Secs. 1.60 and 1.62 become 
    well known among patent practitioners. Applications purporting to be an 
    application filed under Sec. 1.60 will simply be treated as a new 
    application filed under Sec. 1.53 (i.e., the reference to Sec. 1.60 
    will simply be ignored).
        Applications purporting to be an application filed under Sec. 1.62 
    will be treated as continued prosecution applications under 
    Sec. 1.53(b)(3), and those applications that do not meet the 
    requirements of Sec. 1.53(b)(3) (e.g., continuation-in-part 
    applications or continuations or divisional of applications filed 
    before June 8, 1995) will be treated as improper continued prosecution 
    applications under Sec. 1.53(b)(3). Such improper applications under 
    Sec. 1.53(b)(3) may be corrected by
    
    [[Page 49829]]
    
    way of petition under Sec. 1.53(b)(c) (and $130 fee pursuant to 
    Sec. 1.17(i)).
        Such a Sec. 1.53(c) petition in a continuation or divisional 
    application will be granted on the condition that the applicant file: 
    (1) The $130 petition fee, and (2) a true copy of the complete 
    application designated as the prior application in the purported 
    Sec. 1.62 application papers as filed, or, if the prior application was 
    an application filed under Sec. 1.62, a true copy of its most immediate 
    parent application which contained a specification and drawings as 
    filed. Such a Sec. 1.53(c) petition in a continuation-in-part 
    application will be granted on condition that the applicant file: (1) 
    The $130 petition fee, and (2) a true copy of the complete application 
    designated as the prior application in the purported Sec. 1.62 
    application papers as filed, or, if the prior application was an 
    application filed under Sec. 1.62, a true copy of its most immediate 
    parent application which contained a specification and drawings as 
    filed, and any amendments submitted during the prosecution of the prior 
    application.
        Section 1.63(a)(3) is proposed to be amended by requiring the post 
    office address to appear in the oath or declaration and having the 
    requirement from Sec. 1.41(a) for the full names of the inventors 
    placed therein.
        Section 1.69, paragraph (b), would be amended to remove the 
    requirement that the translation be verified in accordance with the 
    proposed change to Sec. 1.4(d)(2). Paragraph (b) of this section is 
    also being amended to clarify the need for a statement that the 
    translation being offered is an accurate translation, as is proposed 
    for Sec. 1.52, paragraph (a) and (d).
        Section 1.78(a)(1)(ii), as proposed, would remove the references to 
    Secs. 1.60 and 62 in view of the proposed deletion of Secs. 1.60 and 
    62.
        Section 1.84, paragraph (b), is proposed to be amended by removing 
    references to the filing of black and white photographs in design 
    applications as unnecessary in view of the reference in Sec. 1.152 to 
    Sec. 1.84(b).
        Section 1.91 is proposed to be amended for clarification purposes 
    by additionally reciting ``Exhibits'' as well as models. The section is 
    proposed to be amended to state that a model, working model or other 
    physical exhibit may be required by the Office if deemed necessary for 
    any purpose in examination of the application. This language is moved 
    from Sec. 1.92.
        Section 1.92 is proposed to be removed and reserved and the 
    language, as stated above, transferred to Sec. 1.91 for improved 
    contextual purposes.
        Section 1.97 (c) through (e) are proposed to be amended by 
    replacement of ``certification'' by ``statement,'' see comments 
    relating to Sec. 1.4(d), and by clarifying the current use of 
    ``statement'' by the terms ``information disclosure.'' Section 
    1.97(e)(2) is further amended to replace ``or'' by ``and'' to require 
    that: No item of information contained in the information disclosure 
    statement was cited in a communication from a foreign patent office in 
    a counterpart foreign application and that no item of information 
    contained in the information disclosure statement to the knowledge of 
    the person signing the statement, after making reasonable inquiry, was 
    known to any individual designated in Sec. 1.56(c) more than three 
    months prior to the filing of the information disclosure statement. The 
    use of ``and'' rather than ``or'' is in keeping with the intent of the 
    rule as expressed in the MPEP 609, page 600-91, that the conjunction be 
    conjunctive rather than disjunctive. The mere absence of an item of 
    information from a foreign patent office communication was clearly not 
    intended to represent an opportunity to delay the submission of the 
    item when known more than three months prior to the filing of an 
    information disclosure statement to an individual having a duty of 
    disclosure under Sec. 1.56.
        Section 1.101 is proposed to be removed and reserved as relating to 
    internal Office instructions.
        Section 1.102, paragraph (a), would be amended to remove the 
    requirement that the showing be verified in accordance with the 
    proposed change to Sec. 1.4(d)(2).
        Section 1.103, paragraph (a), would be amended by replacement of 
    ``response'' with ``reply'' in accordance with the proposed change to 
    Sec. 1.111.
        Section 1.104 is proposed to be removed and reserved as relating to 
    internal Office instructions (the material of paragraph (c) would be 
    present in the MPEP).
        Section 1.105 is proposed to be removed and reserved as relating to 
    internal Office instructions.
        Section 1.108 is proposed to be removed and reserved as relating to 
    internal Office instructions.
        Section 1.111(b) is proposed to be amended to explicitly recognize 
    that a reply must be reduced to a writing which must point out the 
    specific distinctions believed to render the claims, including any 
    newly presented claims, patentable. It is noted that an examiner's 
    amendment reducing a telephone interview to writing would comply with 
    Sec. 1.2.
        In Sec. 1.112 it is proposed to remove as being unnecessary the 
    statement that ``any amendments after a second Office action must 
    ordinarily be restricted to the rejection, objections or requirements 
    made in the office action'' to reflect actual practice wherein an 
    unrestricted right of entry exists prior to a final rejection and that 
    an application or patent under reexamination be considered repeatedly 
    unless a final action is rendered. It is proposed to amend the section 
    for clarification purposes by addition of a reference to 
    reconsideration ``before final action.''
        Section 1.113(a), as proposed, would add ``by the examiner'' after 
    ``examination or consideration,'' change ``objections to form'' to 
    ``objections as to form'' for clarity, and would replace ``response'' 
    with ``reply'' in accordance with the proposed change to Sec. 1.111.
        Section 1.113(b), as proposed, would change ``clearly stating the 
    reasons therefor'' to ``clearly stating the reasons in support 
    thereof'' for clarity.
        A new Sec. 1.113(c) would be added to provide that the first action 
    in an application will not be made final. See comments to Secs. 1.116 
    and 1.191.
        Section 1.115 is proposed to be replaced by new Sec. 1.115 that 
    would contain material to be deleted from Secs. 1.117 through 1.119, 
    1.123 and 1.124. No change in substance is contemplated with the 
    material of deleted sections being rearranged and edited for clarity 
    and contextual purposes in the new section. The reference to 
    ``application'' is intended to include reissue applications.
        Section 1.116(a), as proposed, would limit amendments after a final 
    rejection or other final action (Sec. 1.113) to those amendments 
    cancelling claims or complying with any requirement of form set forth 
    in a previous Office action, and would replace the phrase ``any 
    proceedings relative thereto'' with ``any related proceedings'' for 
    clarity.
        Section 1.116(b), as proposed, would provide that any amendment not 
    in compliance with Sec. 1.116(a) must be submitted with a request for 
    an application under Sec. 1.53(b)(3) to ensure consideration of the 
    amendment.
        Under Sec. 1.116, as proposed, amendments after final rejection or 
    other final action would be limited to cancelling claims or complying 
    with any requirement of form expressly set forth in a previous Office 
    action. Currently, amendments after final which concern the merits of 
    an application may, upon a showing of good and sufficient reasons why 
    they are necessary and were not earlier presented, be entered and 
    amendments after final which present rejected claims
    
    [[Page 49830]]
    
    in better form for consideration on appeal may be entered. This 
    procedure causes delays in the ultimate issuance of the application as 
    a patent, since applicants will await a ruling on whether such 
    amendment will be entered prior to deciding whether to obtain the entry 
    of such amendment through the filing of a continuing application. In 
    addition, the expedited handling of numerous amendments after final, 
    and the expedited consideration of whether there is an adequate showing 
    of good and sufficient reasons why an amendment after final concerning 
    the merits of an application is necessary and not earlier presented, or 
    whether an amendment after final presents rejected claims in better 
    form for consideration on appeal, places a significant burden on Office 
    resources.
        Section 1.113(c), as proposed, would eliminate first action final 
    practice, and, as such, would eliminate the necessity to submit an 
    amendment after final simply to avoid a first action final in a 
    continuing application. In view of this safeguard, and the delay and 
    burden of the current practice for the treatment of amendments after 
    final, Sec. 1.116 is proposed to be amended to limit those amendments 
    that may be presented as a matter of right after a final rejection or 
    other final action. Put simply, the proposed elimination of first 
    action final practice by the Office is the quid pro quo for the 
    proposed strict limitation of after final practice. Persons submitting 
    comments objecting to this proposed limitation of after final practice 
    should frame such comments in the context that the proposed elimination 
    of first action final practice by the Office is coupled to the proposed 
    limitation of after final practice.
        Section 1.116, as proposed, would not affect the authority of an 
    examiner to enter in an application under final an amendment that 
    places the application in condition for allowance, but does not 
    strictly meet the requirements of Sec. 1.116(a). That is, in instances 
    in which the applicant and examiner agree on an amendment that would 
    place the application in condition for allowance, the examiner would 
    retain the authority to enter the amendment, notwithstanding the 
    requirements of Sec. 1.116(a). Where, however, the applicant and the 
    examiner do not agree on whether an amendment would place an 
    application in condition for allowance, and the amendment does not meet 
    the requirements of Sec. 1.116(a), the applicant could not require the 
    examiner to consider the amendment as a matter of right.
        Section 1.117 is proposed to be removed and reserved as the subject 
    matter was transferred to proposed Sec. 1.115.
        Section 1.118 is proposed to be removed and reserved and its 
    subject matter transferred to proposed Sec. 1.115.
        Section 1.119 is proposed to be removed and reserved and its 
    subject matter transferred to proposed Sec. 1.115.
        Section 1.121 paragraphs (a) through (f) are proposed to be 
    replaced with paragraphs (a) through (c), which separately treat 
    amendments in non-reissue applications (paragraph (a)), amendments in 
    reissue applications (paragraph (b)) and amendments in reexamination 
    proceedings (paragraph (c)). Paragraphs (a) and (b) each separately 
    treat amendment of the specification (paragraphs (a)(1) and (b)(1)) and 
    of the claims (paragraphs (a)(2) and (b)(2)). In comparing amendment 
    practice to the specificat'ion for non-reissue and reissue 
    applications: When making an amendment to the specification of a non-
    reissue application a copy of all previous amendments would not be 
    required, whereas for reissue applications a copy of all previous 
    amendments to the patent specification would be required. In comparing 
    amendment practice to the claims for non-reissue and reissue 
    applications: When making an amendment to the claims of a non-reissue 
    application or when new claims are added, a copy of all pending claims, 
    including original claims that have never been amended, would be 
    required, whereas for reissue applications a copy of only claims that 
    are being amended or added would be required.
        Paragraph (a) of Sec. 1.121 would relate to amendments in non-
    reissue applications and retains a reference to Sec. 1.52. Paragraph 
    (a)(1) would relate to the manner of making amendments in the 
    specification other than in the claims. Paragraph (a)(1)(i) would 
    require the precise point to be indicated where an amendment is made. 
    Paragraph (a)(1)(ii) would allow amendments that are deletions only to 
    be done by a direction to cancel rather than presenting the 
    sentence(s), paragraph(s) and/or page(s) with brackets. This should be 
    compared to cancellation of material from the patent specification in a 
    reissue application (paragraph (b)((1)((ii)) or in a reexamination 
    proceedings (Sec. 1.530(d)(1)(ii)--by way of a copy of the rewritten 
    material). Paragraph (a)(1)(iii) would require all other amendments, 
    such as additions or deletions mixed with additions, to be made by 
    submission of a copy of the rewritten sentence(s), paragraph(s) and/or 
    page(s) to permit the examiner to more readily recognize the changes 
    that are being made. Current practice does not require the marking of 
    an amendment to the specification in non-reissue applications. A change 
    in one sentence, paragraph or page that results in only format changes 
    to other pages not being amended are not to be submitted. Paragraph 
    (a)(1)(iv) would identify the type of markings required by paragraph 
    (a)(1)(iii), single underlining for added material and single brackets 
    for material deleted. The marking would also be required to be applied 
    in reference to the material as previously rewritten and not as 
    originally presented if that differed from the previous presentation.
        Paragraph (a)(2) of Sec. 1.121 would relate to the manner of making 
    amendments in the claims of a non-reissue application. Paragraph 
    (a)(2)(i)(A) would permit cancellation of a claim by a direction to do 
    so or by simply omitting a copy of the claim when a complete copy of 
    all pending claims are presented pursuant to paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of 
    this section. Paragraph (a)(2)(i)(B) would permit amendment of a 
    previously submitted claim, other than mere cancellation by submission 
    of a copy of the claim completely rewritten with markings pursuant to 
    paragraph (a)(2)(iii) of this section rather than continuing to permit 
    requests that the Office hand-enter changes of five or less words, 
    Sec. 1.121(c)(2). Such rewriting would be construed as a direction that 
    the rewritten claim be a replacement for the previously submitted 
    claim. Paragraph (a)(2)(i)(C) sets forth that a new claim may only be 
    added by the submission of a clean copy of the new claim.
        Paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of Sec. 1.121 would require that when a 
    previously submitted claim is amended, or when a new claim is added, 
    applicant must submit a separate copy of all pending claims to include 
    all newly rewritten claims, all newly added claims, all previously 
    rewritten claims that are still pending and any unamended claims that 
    are still pending. This would enable the examiner to more quickly 
    identify the claims that must be reviewed for the next Office action 
    and would enable the printer to have a current version of the allowed 
    claims for printing should the application be allowed. Compare with 
    amendment of claims in reissue applications wherein only a copy of an 
    amended patent claim or added claim is required, paragraph (b)(2)(i)(A) 
    of this section, but not of previous claims (patent and added claims) 
    that are not currently being amended. Current practice does not require 
    a complete copy of all pending claims but only those claims being 
    amended or added.
    
    [[Page 49831]]
    
        Paragraph (a)(2)(iii) of Sec. 1.121 would identify the type of 
    marking required by paragraph (a)(2)(i)(B), single underlining for 
    added material and single brackets for material deleted.
        Paragraph (a)(2)(iv) of Sec. 1.121 would provide that the failure 
    to submit a copy of any previously submitted claim would be construed 
    as a direction to cancel that claim.
        Paragraph (a)(3) of Sec. 1.121 would clarify that amendments to the 
    original application drawings for non-reissue applications are not 
    permitted and are to be made by way of a substitute sheet for each 
    original drawing sheet that is to be amended.
        Paragraph (a)(4) of Sec. 1.121 would require that any amendment 
    presented in a substitute specification must be presented under the 
    provision of this section either prior to or concurrent with the 
    submission of the substitute specification.
        Paragraph (b) of Sec. 1.121 would apply to amendments in reissue 
    applications. Paragraph (b)(1) of Sec. 1.121 would relate to the manner 
    of making amendments to the specification other than in the claims in 
    reissue applications. Paragraph (b)(1)(i) would require the precise 
    point to be indicated where an amendment is made. Paragraph (b)(1)(ii) 
    would require that all amendments including deletions be made by 
    submission of a copy of the rewritten paragraph(s) with markings. A 
    change in one sentence, paragraph or page that results in only format 
    changes to other pages not being amended are not to be submitted. 
    Compare to amendments to the specification other than in the claims of 
    non-reissue applications wherein deletions are permitted, paragraph 
    (a)(1)(ii) of this section. Paragraph (b)(1)(iii) sets forth that each 
    amendment to the specification must include all amendments to the 
    specification relative to the patent as of the date of the submission. 
    Compare to amendments to the specification other than claims in 
    nonreissue applications wherein previous amendments to the 
    specification are not required to accompany the current amendment to 
    the specification, paragraph (a)(1)(iii). Paragraph (b)(1)(iv) would 
    define the marking set forth in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of section.
        Paragraph (b)(2) of Sec. 1.121 would relate to the manner of making 
    amendments to the claims in reissue applications. Paragraph 
    (b)(2)(i)(A) of Sec. 1.121 would require the entire text of each patent 
    claim that is being amended and of each added claim rather than 
    continuing to permit requests that the Office hand-enter changes of 
    five or less words, Sec. 1.121(c)(2), but not of all pending claims, 
    such as patent claims that have not been amended. Compare paragraph 
    (a)(2)((ii). Additionally, provision would be made for the cancellation 
    of a patent claim by a direction to cancel without the need for marking 
    by brackets. Paragraph (b)(2)(i)(B) would require that patent claims 
    not be renumbered. Paragraph (b)(2)(i)(C) would identify the type of 
    marking required by paragraph (b)(2)(i)(A), single underlining for 
    added material and single brackets for material deleted.
        Paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of Sec. 1.121 would require that each 
    amendment submission set forth the status of all patent claims and all 
    added claims as of the date of the submission, as not all claims (non-
    amended claims) are to be presented with each submission, paragraph 
    (b)(2)(iv). The absence of submission of the claim status would result 
    in an incomplete response, 35 U.S.C. 135.
        Paragraph (b)(2)(iii) of Sec. 1.121 would require that each claim 
    amendment be accompanied by an explanation of the support in the 
    disclosure of the patent for the amendment. The absence of an 
    explanation would result in an incomplete response, 35 U.S.C. 135.
        Paragraph (b)(2)(iv) of Sec. 1.121 would require that each 
    submission of an amendment to any claim (patent claim or added claim) 
    requires copies of all amendments to the claims as of the date of the 
    submission. A copy of a previous amendment would not meet the 
    requirement of this section in that all amendments must be represented, 
    as only the last amendment will be used for printing.
        Paragraph (b)(2)(v) of Sec. 1.121 would provide that the failure to 
    submit a copy of any added claim would be construed as a direction to 
    cancel that claim.
        Paragraph (b)(2)(vi) of Sec. 1.121 would clarify that: (1) No 
    reissue patent would be granted enlarging the scope of the claims 
    unless applied for within two years from the grant of the original 
    patent (additional broadening outside the two-year limit is appropriate 
    as long as some broadening occurred within the two-year period), and 
    (2) no amendment may introduce new matter or be made in an expired 
    patent.
        Paragraph (b)(3) of Sec. 1.121 clarify that amendments to the 
    patent drawings are not permitted and that any change must be by way of 
    a new sheet of drawings with the amended figures being identified as 
    ``amended'' and with added figures identified as ``new'' for each sheet 
    that has changed.
        Paragraph (c) of Sec. 1.121 would clarify that amendments in 
    reexamination proceedings are to be made in accordance with Sec. 1.530.
        Section 1.121 as applied both to non-reissue and reissue 
    applications does not provide for replacement pages whereby a new page 
    would be physically substituted for a currently existing page. However, 
    an applicant can direct that Page ______ be cancelled and the following 
    inserted in its place. The wide availability of word processing should 
    enable applicants to more easily submit updated material providing 
    greater accuracy and thereby eliminating the need for the Office to 
    hand-enter amendments. To that end, Sec. 1.125 is proposed to be 
    amended to provide that a substitute specification may be submitted at 
    any point up to payment of the issue fee as a matter of right.
        The proposed changes to Sec. 1.121 relate in part to the method of 
    presenting amendments in reissue and reexamination proceedings, that 
    would more closely parallel each other. The Office seeks guidance on 
    the usefulness of bringing reissue and reexamination proceedings in 
    closer harmony. Currently, both practitioners and Office personnel must 
    retain a working knowledge of these infrequently used but vital avenues 
    for review of an issued patent. The Office has identified the following 
    areas for possible harmonization and would like comments as to the 
    appropriateness of these areas, identification of other suitable areas 
    for consideration and specific means to achieve harmonization in the 
    identified areas, e.g., whether a concept or practice in one area 
    should be applied to the other area or a new practice for both should 
    be started:
    
    --Procedures for amending claims and the specification, Sec. 1.121
    --To utilize a reissue certificate (similar to a reexamination 
    certificate) attached to a copy of the original patent as the reissued 
    patent. This procedure would eliminate the need to reprint the entire 
    reissued patent.
    --Whether the special dispatch provisions of re-examination should be 
    applied to reissue applications.
    
        Section 1.122 is proposed to be removed and reserved as 
    representing internal Office instruction.
        Section 1.123 is proposed to be removed and reserved and its 
    subject matter transferred to proposed Sec. 1.115 for better context.
        Section 1.124 is proposed to be removed and reserved and its 
    subject matter transferred to proposed Sec. 1.115 for better context.
        Section 1.125 is proposed to be amended by addition of paragraphs 
    (a)
    
    [[Page 49832]]
    
    through (d). Paragraph (a) would retain the current practice that a 
    substitute specification may be required by the examiner and would be 
    clarified to note that if the legibility of the application papers 
    shall render it difficult to consider the case, the Office may require 
    a substitute specification.
        Paragraph (b) of Sec. 1.125 would provide for the right of filing a 
    substitute specification in an application other than a reissue 
    application, at any point up to payment of the issue fee, if it is 
    accompanied by a statement that the substitute specification includes 
    no new matter and does not introduce any amendments unless they have 
    been submitted in accordance with the requirements of Sec. 1.121(a) 
    either prior to or concurrent with the submission of the substitute 
    specification. In view of the proposed continued prosecution 
    application under Sec. 1.53(b)(3) and the need to submit sentence, 
    paragraph, and/or page changes under Sec. 1.121(a), liberalization of 
    the substitute specification requirements is desirable. The requirement 
    for a lack of new matter statement being verified would be deleted. See 
    comments to Sec. 1.4(d).
        Paragraph (c) of Sec. 1.125 would clarify that a substitute 
    specification is to be submitted without markings as to amended 
    material.
        Paragraph (d) of Sec. 1.125 would not permit a substitute 
    specification in reissue or reexamination proceedings as markings for 
    changes from the patent are required therein.
        Section 1.133, paragraph (b), would be amended by replacement of 
    ``response'' with ``reply'' in accordance with the proposed change to 
    Sec. 1.111.
        Section 1.134 would be amended by replacement of ``response'' with 
    ``reply'' in accordance with the proposed change to Sec. 1.111.
        Section 1.135, paragraphs (a) and (c), would be amended by 
    replacement of ``response'' with ``reply'' in accordance with the 
    proposed change to Sec. 1.111. Paragraph (b) is proposed to be amended 
    to clarify that the admission of or refusal to admit any amendment 
    after final rejection, and not just an amendment not responsive to the 
    last Office action, shall not operate to save the application from 
    abandonment.
        Section 1.135, paragraph (c), is proposed to be amended to provide 
    that a new ``time period'' under Sec. 1.134 may be given if a reply to 
    a non-final Office action is substantially complete but consideration 
    of some matter or compliance with some requirement has been 
    inadvertently omitted. This would replace the current practice whereby 
    applicant may be given an opportunity to supply the omission through 
    the setting of a ``time limit'' of one month that is not currently 
    extendable. Generally, a new one month shortened statutory time period 
    would be utilized enabling an applicant to petition for extensions of 
    time under Sec. 1.136(a). Where 35 U.S.C. 133 requires a period longer 
    than one month, i.e., actions mailed in the month of February, a 
    shortened statutory period of 30 days will be set. The setting of a 
    time period for reply under Sec. 1.134 rather than a time limit would 
    result in the date of abandonment (when no further reply is filed) 
    being the expiration of the new time period rather than, at present, 
    the date of expiration of the period of reply set in the original 
    Office action for which an incomplete reply was filed. Thus, the 
    proposed amendment to paragraph (c) of Sec. 1.135 would permit the 
    refiling of a continuing application as an alternative to completing 
    the reply, whereas the current rule only permits an applicant to 
    complete the reply that was held to be incomplete.
        Section 1.135, paragraph (c), is also proposed to be amended to 
    remove an unnecessary reference to consideration of the question of 
    abandonment and to clarify that the reply for which applicant may be 
    given a new time period to reply to must be a ``non-final'' Office 
    action.
        Section 1.136, paragraph (a)(1), is proposed to be amended to 
    recite the availability of a maximum of five (5) rather than four (4) 
    months as an extension of time when only a one (1) month or 30 day 
    shortened statutory period or a non-statutory period for reply is set. 
    Paragraph (a)(1) is would also be amended by replacement of ``respond'' 
    with ``reply'' in accordance with the proposed change to Sec. 1.111.
        Section 1.136, paragraph (a)(2), would be amended by replacement of 
    ``respond'' with ``reply'' in accordance with the proposed change to 
    Sec. 1.111 and other clarification changes.
        Section 1.136 is proposed to be amended by addition of paragraph 
    (a)(3) that would now provide for the filing in an application a 
    general authorization to treat any reply requiring a petition for an 
    extension of time for its timely submission as containing a request 
    therefor for the appropriate length of time. The authorization may be 
    filed at any time prior to or with the submission of a reply that would 
    require an extension of time for its timely submission, including 
    submission with the application papers. Currently, the mere presence of 
    a general authorization, submitted prior to or with a reply requiring 
    an extension of time, to charge all required fees does not amount to a 
    petition for an extension of time for that reply (MPEP 201.06 and 
    714.17) and under the proposed amended rule the submission of a reply 
    requiring an extension of time for its timely submission would not be 
    treated as an inherent petition for an extension of time absent an 
    authorization for all necessary extensions of time. The Office will 
    continue to treat all petitions for an extension of time as requesting 
    the appropriate extension period notwithstanding an inadvertent 
    reference to a shorter period for extension and will liberally 
    interpret comparable papers as petitions for an extension of time. 
    Applicants are advised to file general authorizations for payment of 
    fees and petitions for extensions of times as separate papers rather 
    than as sentences buried in papers directed to other matters (such as 
    an application transmittal letter). The use of individual papers 
    directed only to an extension of time or to a general authorization for 
    payment of fees would permit the Office to more readily identify the 
    presence of such items and list them individually on the application 
    file jacket thereby providing ready future identification of these 
    authorizations.
        Clarifying language is proposed for Sec. 1.136(a)(3) to reflect 
    current practice that general authorizations to charge fees are 
    effective to meet the requirement for the extension of time fee for 
    responses filed concurrent or subsequent to the authorization. However, 
    a general authorization to charge additional fees does not represent a 
    petition for an extension of time, which petition must be separately 
    requested.
        Section 1.137 is proposed to be amended by moving language 
    presently codified, elsewhere to, inter alia, incorporate revival of 
    abandoned applications and lapsed patents for the failure: (1) To 
    timely reply to an Office requirement in a provisional application 
    (Sec. 1.139), (2) to timely pay the issue fee for a design application 
    (Sec. 1.155 paragraphs (b)-(f)), (3) to timely pay the issue fee for a 
    utility or plant application (Sec. 1.316 paragraphs (b)-(f)), or to 
    timely pay the full amount of the issue fee (Sec. 1.317 paragraphs (b)-
    (f)) (lapsed patents). Cites in parentheses reference where subject 
    matter is contained in current rules.
        Section 1.137(a), as proposed, would further move into paragraph 
    (a)(3) the requirement that a petition thereunder be ``promptly filed 
    after the applicant is notified of, or otherwise becomes aware of, the 
    abandonment.'' 35 U.S.C. 133 requires that ``it be shown * * * that 
    such delay was unavoidable.'' This
    
    [[Page 49833]]
    
    requirement is regarded as requiring not only a showing that the delay 
    which resulted in the abandonment of the application was unavoidable, 
    but also a showing of unavoidable delay from the time an applicant 
    becomes aware of the abandonment of the application until the filing of 
    a petition to revive. See In re Application of Takao 17 USPQ2d 1155 
    (Comm'r Pat. 1990). The burden of continuing the process of presenting 
    a grantable petition in a timely manner likewise remains with the 
    applicant until the applicant is informed that the petition is granted. 
    Id. An applicant seeking to revive an ``unavoidably'' abandoned 
    application is expected to cause a petition under Sec. 1.137(a) to be 
    filed without delay (i.e., promptly upon becoming notified, or 
    otherwise becoming aware, of the abandonment of the application). As 
    such, the placement of the requirement that a petition pursuant to 
    Sec. 1.137(a) be filed promptly upon becoming notified, or otherwise 
    becoming aware, of the abandonment of the application is appropriately 
    located in paragraph (a)(3), since Sec. 1.137(a)(3) includes the 
    requirement for a showing of unavoidable delay.
        The requirement that an applicant seeking to revive an application 
    as ``unavoidably'' abandoned ``promptly'' file a petition under 
    Sec. 1.137 is regarded as a requirement that a petition pursuant to 
    Sec. 1.137(a) be filed without delay upon the applicant or his or her 
    representative being notified of, or otherwise becoming aware of, the 
    abandonment. Thus, under the current and proposed practice, the failure 
    to file a petition under Sec. 1.137(a) within three months of the date 
    the applicant or his or her representative is notified of, or otherwise 
    becomes aware of, the abandonment would generally be regarded as a 
    failure to ``promptly'' file a petition pursuant to Sec. 1.137.
        Providing a time period based upon the date of abandonment during 
    which a petition pursuant to Sec. 1.137(b) must be filed to be timely, 
    but providing no comparable time period within which a petition 
    pursuant to Sec. 1.137(a) must be filed to be timely, results in the 
    misapplication of Sec. 1.137 on the part of practitioners, which in 
    turn results in an inordinate administrative burden to the Office. The 
    Office is proposing to either: (1) Eliminate the time period 
    requirement for filing a petition pursuant to Sec. 1.137(b), or (2) 
    provide comparable time period requirements for filing either a 
    petition pursuant to Sec. 1.137(a) and/or Sec. 1.137(b), which time 
    period will be based upon the date of the first Office notification 
    that the application had become abandoned or that the patent had 
    lapsed. Interested persons are advised to comment on each of these 
    proposals, since, depending upon further consideration by the Office 
    and the comments received in response to this notice of proposed 
    rulemaking, either proposal may be adopted in the final rule.
        Providing the period of ``within one year of the date on which the 
    application became abandoned'' as the period during which a petition 
    under Sec. 1.137(b) may be timely filed has had the undesirable effect 
    of inducing applicants, or their representatives, to delay the filing 
    of a petition under Sec. 1.137(b) until the end of this one year 
    period. This deliberate delay in filing a petition under Sec. 1.137(b), 
    or use of this one year period as an extension of time, is considered 
    an abuse of Sec. 1.137(b). See In re Application of S., 8 USPQ2d 1630, 
    1632 (Comm'r Pats 1988). In addition, Sec. 1.137(b) was recently 
    amended to require that any petition thereunder include a statement 
    that the delay (i.e., the entire delay), and not merely the 
    abandonment, was unintentional. See Final Rule, ``Changes in Procedures 
    for Revival of Patent Applications and Reinstatement of Patents,'' 
    published in the Federal Register at 58 FR 44277 (August 20, 1993) and 
    in the Patent and Trademark Office Official Gazette at 1154 Off. Gaz. 
    Pat Office 4 (September 14, 1993). As such, any intentional delay in 
    filing a petition under Sec. 1.137(b) is prohibited by the current 
    terms of the rule.
        Under current rules, in instances in which an applicant, or his or 
    her representative, intentionally delays the filing of a petition under 
    Sec. 1.137(b) until the end of this one year period, but files a 
    petition under Sec. 1.137(b) within this one year period, the petition 
    is timely under Sec. 1.137(b)(4), but the statement that ``the delay 
    was unintentional'' is not appropriate.
        In instances in which the filing of a petition under Sec. 1.137(b) 
    is intentionally delayed until the end of this one year period, and the 
    applicant, or his or her representative, miscalculates the actual date 
    of abandonment, or otherwise misdockets the end of this one year 
    period, the statement that ``the delay was unintentional'' is likewise 
    not appropriate, but the petition is also barred by the terms of the 
    rule. In addition, subsequent petitions under Sec. 1.137(a) are, 
    regardless of the original cause of the abandonment, barred due to the 
    applicant's failure to cause a petition under Sec. 1.137(a) to be 
    ``promptly filed after the applicant is notified of, or otherwise 
    becomes aware of, the abandonment.'' See Application of S., 8 USPQ2d at 
    1632.
        Where the applicant deliberately permits an application to become 
    abandoned (e.g., due to a conclusion that the claims are unpatentable 
    (e.g., that a rejection in an Office action cannot be overcome), or 
    that the invention lacks sufficient commercial value to justify 
    continued prosecution), the abandonment of such application is 
    considered a deliberately chosen course of action, and the resulting 
    delay cannot be considered ``unintentional'' within the meaning of 37 
    CFR 1.137(b). See In re Application of G., 11 USPQ2d 1378, 1380 (Comm'r 
    Pat. 1989). Likewise, where the applicant deliberately chooses not to 
    either seek or persist in seeking the revival of an abandoned 
    application, the resulting delay in seeking revival of the application 
    cannot be considered ``unintentional'' within the meaning of 37 CFR 
    1.137. The correctness or propriety of the rejection, or other 
    objection, requirement, or decision, by the Office, the appropriateness 
    of the applicant's decision to abandon the application or to not seek 
    or persist in seeking revival, or the discovery of new information or 
    evidence, or other change in circumstances subsequent to the 
    abandonment or decision not to seek or persist in seeking revival, are 
    immaterial to such intentional delay caused by the deliberate course of 
    action chosen by the applicant.
        The intentional abandonment of an application, or an intentional 
    delay in seeking either the withdrawal of a holding of abandonment in 
    or the revival of an abandoned application, precludes a finding of 
    unavoidable or unintentional delay pursuant to Sec. 1.137. See In re 
    Maldague, 10 USPQ2d 1477, 1478 (Comm'r Pat. 1988).
    
    Proposed Elimination of the Time Period Requirement for Filing a 
    Petition Pursuant to Sec. 1.137(b)
    
        Under this proposal, an intentional delay in the filing of a 
    petition under Sec. 1.137(b) will not result in an untimely petition 
    pursuant to Sec. 1.137(b). The statement that ``the delay was 
    unintentional,'' however, will continue to be inappropriate. That is, 
    where there is an intentional delay in the filing of a petition under 
    Sec. 1.137(b), the statement that ``the delay was unintentional'' will 
    continue to be inappropriate (i.e., the applicant, or his or her 
    representative cannot properly make this statement, and thus cannot 
    properly request revival of the application), but Sec. 1.137(b) would 
    no longer include an additional time period requirement. It is 
    anticipated that the effects of prosecution delay due to abandonment on 
    patent term under Public Law 103-465, and the proposed
    
    [[Page 49834]]
    
    changes to Sec. 1.137(c), will eliminate any incentive to intentionally 
    delay the revival of an abandoned application.
        An applicant, assignee, or his or her representative, desiring the 
    revival of an application that has inadvertently or unintentionally 
    become abandoned is expected to act without intentional delay in 
    seeking revival of the application. The Office does not question 
    whether there has been an intentional or otherwise impermissible delay 
    when a petition pursuant to Sec. 1.137 is filed within three months of 
    the date the applicant is first notified by the Office that the 
    application is abandoned. Where, however, there is a greater delay 
    between the date the applicant is first notified by the Office that the 
    application is abandoned and the filing of a petition pursuant to 
    Sec. 1.137(b), the Office may raise the question as to whether the 
    delay was unintentional, and may require more than a mere statement 
    that the delay was unintentional. The Office may question whether the 
    delay was unintentional in instances in which an applicant fails to 
    timely seek reconsideration of a decision refusing to revive an 
    abandoned application (see Sec. 1.137(d)).
        Regardless of whether the time period requirement in Sec. 1.137(b) 
    is eliminated, applicants seeking revival of an abandoned application 
    are advised to file a petition pursuant to Sec. 1.137 within three 
    months of first notification that the application is abandoned to avoid 
    the question of intentional delay being raised by the Office or third 
    parties seeking to challenge any patent issuing from the application.
        While this proposal would permit revival pursuant to Sec. 1.137(b) 
    without regard to the period of abandonment, Sec. 1.137(a) currently 
    permits revival pursuant thereto without regard to the period of 
    abandonment. In addition, the Office currently entertains petitions 
    pursuant to Sec. 1.183, albeit under strictly limited conditions, to 
    waive the time period requirement in Sec. 1.137(b). Since an 
    application may currently be revived pursuant to Sec. 1.137 without 
    regard to the period of abandonment, any current reliance upon the 
    period of abandonment to ensure that the application will never issue 
    as a patent is misplaced. Thus, the proposed elimination of the time 
    period requirement in Sec. 1.137(b) would not significantly decrease 
    the relationship between the period of abandonment of an application 
    and the likelihood that such application would ever issue as a patent.
        In the event that the proposed elimination of the time period 
    requirement for filing a petition pursuant to Sec. 1.137(b) is adopted, 
    public comment is also requested on the application of this rule change 
    to applications that were abandoned prior to the effective date of this 
    rule change. This provision could be made effective as to petitions 
    filed on or after the effective date of the rule change, which would 
    permit the revival pursuant to Sec. 1.137(b) of applications abandoned 
    for extended periods of time, provided that the entire delay was 
    unintentional. This provision could also be made effective as to 
    applications abandoned on or after the effective date, with the 
    provisions of current Sec. 1.137(b) being applied to applications 
    abandoned prior to the effective date of the rule change. This 
    provision could also be made effective as to applications abandoned 
    within and/or having a petition to revive filed within a specified 
    period preceding the effective date of the rule change.
    
    Proposed Comparable Time Period Requirements Each of Secs. 1.137 (a) 
    and (b) Based Upon the Date of the First Office Notification That the 
    Application Had Become Abandoned or That the Patent Had Lapsed
    
        The Office is also considering amending each of Secs. 1.137 (a) and 
    (b) to include an express requirement that a petition thereunder be 
    filed within a time certain. Specifically, the Office is also 
    considering amending Sec. 1.137(a) to include the express requirement 
    that a petition thereunder be filed within three months of the date of 
    the first Office notification that the application had become abandoned 
    or that the patent had lapsed and amending Sec. 1.137(b) to include the 
    requirement that a petition thereunder be filed within three months of 
    the date of the first Office notification that the application had 
    become abandoned or that the patent had lapsed, or within three months 
    of the date of the first decision on a timely petition pursuant to 
    Sec. 1.137(a).
        The ``promptly filed'' requirement in Sec. 1.137(a) is the subject 
    of various interpretations by applicants seeking revival pursuant to 
    Sec. 1.137(a). To avoid misunderstandings as to the timeliness with 
    which the Office expects an applicant seeking revival pursuant to 
    Sec. 1.137(a) to file a petition thereunder, the Office is considering 
    amending Sec. 1.137(a) to include the express requirement that a 
    petition thereunder be filed within a time certain. Providing a period 
    during which a timely petition pursuant to Sec. 1.137 (a) and/or (b) 
    may be filed based upon the date of the first Office notification that 
    the application had become abandoned or that the patent had lapsed, 
    rather than the date of abandonment or patent lapse, is considered a 
    better measure of timeliness. In addition, providing such a period will 
    reduce uncertainty as to the expiration of the period during which a 
    timely petition pursuant to Sec. 1.137(b), as well as Sec. 1.137(a), 
    may be filed.
        Therefore, the Office is also considering basing the period during 
    which a timely petition under Sec. 1.137 (b), as well as Sec. 1.137(a), 
    may be filed on the date of notification of the abandonment, rather 
    than the date of abandonment, and considers that a period of within 
    three months of the date of the first Office notification that the 
    application had become abandoned or that the patent had lapsed to be 
    the appropriate period.
        Under the appropriate circumstances, petitions under Sec. 1.183 to 
    waive any time period requirement in Secs. 1.137(a) and/or (b) would be 
    available. Waiver of any requirement of Sec. 1.137 will, in accordance 
    with Sec. 1.183, be strictly limited to an ``extraordinary situation'' 
    in which ``justice requires'' such waiver.
        Section 1.137(a)(1), as proposed, would replace the phrase ``a 
    proposed response to continue prosecution of that application, or the 
    filing of a continuing application, unless either has been previously 
    filed'' with ``accompanied by the required reply, unless previously 
    filed. In a nonprovisional application abandoned for failure to 
    prosecute, the proposed reply requirement may be met by the filing of a 
    continuing application. In an abandoned application or a lapsed patent, 
    for failure to pay any portion of the required issue fee, the proposed 
    reply must be the issue fee or any outstanding balance thereof.''
        Section 1.137(b)(1), as proposed, would likewise replace the phrase 
    ``Accompanied by a proposed response to continue prosecution of that 
    application, or filing of a continuing application, unless either has 
    been previously filed'' with ``accompanied by the required reply, 
    unless previously filed. In a nonprovisional application abandoned for 
    failure to prosecute, the proposed reply requirement may be met by the 
    filing of a continuing application. In an abandoned application or a 
    lapsed patent, for failure to pay any portion of the required issue 
    fee, the proposed reply must be the issue fee or any outstanding 
    balance thereof.''
        While the revival of applications abandoned for failure to timely 
    prosecute and for failure to timely pay the issue fee are proposed to 
    be incorporated together in Sec. 1.137, the statutory provisions for 
    the revival of an application abandoned for failure to timely prosecute 
    and for failure to
    
    [[Page 49835]]
    
    timely submit the issue fee are mutually exclusive. See Brenner v. 
    Ebbert, 398 F.2d 762, 157 USPQ 609 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied 393 U.S. 
    926, 159 USPQ 799 (1968). 35 U.S.C. 151 authorizes the acceptance of a 
    delayed payment of the issue fee, if the issue fee ``is submitted * * * 
    and the delay in payment is shown to have been unavoidable.'' 35 U.S.C. 
    41(a)(7) likewise authorizes the acceptance of an ``unintentionally 
    delayed payment of the fee for issuing each patent.'' Thus, 35 U.S.C. 
    41(a)(7) and 151 each require payment of the issue fee as a condition 
    of reviving an application abandoned or patent lapsed for failure to 
    pay the issue fee. Therefore, the filing of a continuing application 
    without payment of the issue fee or any outstanding balance thereof is 
    not an acceptable proposed reply in an application abandoned or patent 
    lapsed for failure to pay any portion of the required issue fee.
        The Notice of Allowance requires the timely payment of the issue 
    fee in effect on the date of its mailing to avoid abandonment of the 
    application. In instances in which there is an increase in the issue 
    fee by the time of payment of the issue fee required in the Notice of 
    Allowance, the Office will mail a notice requiring payment of the 
    balance of the issue fee then in effect. The phrase ``for failure to 
    pay any portion of the required issue fee'' applies to those instances 
    in which the applicant fails to pay either the issue fee required in 
    the Notice of Allowance or the balance of the issue fee required in a 
    subsequent notice. In such instances, the proposed reply must be the 
    issue fee then in effect, if no portion of the issue fee was previously 
    submitted, or any outstanding balance of the issue fee then in effect, 
    if a portion of the issue fee was previously submitted.
        These proposed changes to Secs. 1.137 (a)(1) and (b)(1) are 
    necessary to incorporate into Sec. 1.137 the revival of abandoned 
    applications and lapsed patents for the failure to timely reply to an 
    Office requirement in a provisional application, to timely pay the 
    issue fee, or to timely pay the full amount of the issue fee.
        Sections 1.137 (a) and (b), as proposed, would each include a new 
    paragraph, paragraphs (a)(4) and (b)(4), respectively, providing that 
    any petition thereunder must be accompanied by any terminal disclaimer 
    (and fee as set forth in Sec. 1.20(d)) required pursuant to 
    Sec. 1.137(c), to include in Secs. 1.137 (a) and (b) an explicit 
    reference to the terminal disclaimer requirement in Sec. 1.137(c).
        Section 1.137(c), as proposed, would change the phrase ``any 
    petition pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section'' to ``any petition 
    pursuant to this section.'' As the period for the timely filing of a 
    petition under Sec. 1.137(b) would no longer be based upon the period 
    of abandonment, administrative convenience no longer justifies not 
    requiring, for all design applications and all other nonprovisional 
    utility applications filed prior to June 8, 1995, a terminal disclaimer 
    under Sec. 1.137(c) for all petitions pursuant to Sec. 1.137.
        In addition, the phrase ``not filed within six months of the date 
    of abandonment of the application'' is proposed to be removed from 
    Sec. 1.137(c). The only justification for the current six month 
    limitation on the terminal disclaimer requirement in Sec. 1.137(c) is 
    administrative convenience in treating a petition pursuant to 
    Sec. 1.137(a) filed within six months of the date of abandonment. Since 
    the date of abandonment is miscalculated in a significant number of 
    instances, this provision of Sec. 1.137(c) leads to errors in 
    determining when a terminal disclaimer is required pursuant to 
    Sec. 1.137(c), and thus leads to delays in continuing prosecution of 
    the abandoned application. In any event, administrative convenience is 
    no longer considered an adequate justification for the effective 
    different treatment that would result by operation of Pub. L. 103-465 
    of: (1) Applications filed on or after June 8, 1995, except for design 
    applications, and (2) applications filed prior to June 8, 1995 and all 
    design applications.
        Section 1.137(d), as proposed, would change ``application'' to 
    ``abandoned application or lapsed patent'' to incorporate into 
    Sec. 1.137 the revival of lapsed patents.
        Section 1.137(e), as proposed, would provide that the time periods 
    set forth in Sec. 1.137 may be extended under the provisions of 
    Sec. 1.136.
        Section 1.137(f), as proposed, will expressly provide that a 
    provisional application, abandoned for failure to timely reply to an 
    Office requirement, may be revived pursuant to Sec. 1.137 (a) or (b) so 
    as to be pending for a period of no longer than twelve months from its 
    filing date. In accordance with 35 U.S.C. 111(b)(5), Sec. 1.137(f), as 
    proposed, will clearly indicate that ``[u]nder no circumstances will a 
    provisional application be regarded as pending after twelve months from 
    its filing date.'' Sections 1.139 (a) and (b) each currently provide 
    that a provisional application may be revived so as to be pending for a 
    period of no longer than twelve months from its filing date, and that 
    under no circumstances will a provisional application be regarded as 
    pending after twelve months from its filing date.
        Section 1.139 is proposed to be removed and reserved and its 
    subject matter added to Sec. 1.137.
        Section 1.142 would be amended by replacement of ``response'' with 
    ``reply'' in accordance with the proposed change to Sec. 1.111.
        Section 1.144 is proposed to be amended for clarification purposes.
        Section 1.146 is proposed to be amended for clarification purposes.
        Section 1.152 is proposed to be amended by removing the prohibition 
    against color drawings and color photographs in design applications. 
    Section 1.152 would be amended to permit the use of color photographs 
    and color drawings in design applications subject to the petition 
    requirements of Sec. 1.84(a)(2) inasmuch as color may be an integral 
    element of the ornamental design. While pen and ink drawings may be 
    lined for color, a clear showing of the configuration of the design may 
    be obscured by this drafting method. New technologies, such as 
    holographic designs, fireworks and laser light displays may not be 
    accurately disclosed without the use of color.
        The term ``article'' of Sec. 1.152 would be replaced by the term 
    ``design'' as 35 U.S.C. 171 requires that the claim be directed to the 
    ``design for an article'' not the article, per se. Therefore, to comply 
    with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, it is only 
    necessary that the design as embodied in the article be fully disclosed 
    and not the article itself. The term ``must'' would be replaced by the 
    term ``should'' to allow for latitude in the illustration of articles 
    whose configuration may be understood without surface shading. 
    Clarification language would be added to note that the use of solid 
    black surfaces would be permitted for representation of the color black 
    as well as color contrast and that photographs and ink drawings must 
    not be combined as formal drawings in one application.
        Section 1.154 paragraph (a) would be amended to clarify that a 
    voluntary submission (see comments under Sec. 1.152 relating to 
    substitution of ``design'' for ``article'') may and should be made of 
    ``a brief description of the nature and intended use of the article in 
    which the design is embodied.'' It is current practice for design 
    examiners, in appropriate cases, to inquire as to the nature and 
    intended use of the article in which a claimed design is embodied. The 
    submission of such description will allow for a more accurate initial 
    classification, and aid in providing a proper and complete search at 
    the time of the first action on the merits. In those
    
    [[Page 49836]]
    
    instances where this feature description is necessary to establish a 
    clear understanding of the article in which the design is embodied, 
    provision of the feature description would help in reducing pendency by 
    eliminating the necessity for time consuming correspondence. 
    Specifically, requests for information prior to first action would be 
    avoided. Absent an amendment requesting deletion of the description it 
    would be printed on any patent that would issue.
        Sections 1.155 (b) through (f) are proposed to be removed in view 
    of the proposed amendments to Sec. 1.137.
        Section 1.163 is proposed to be amended to remove an unnecessary 
    and outmoded reference to a ``legible carbon copy of the original'' 
    specification for plant applications.
        Section 1.165 is proposed to be amended by removing a reference to 
    the artistic and competent execution of plant patent drawings which is 
    unnecessary in view of the reference to Sec. 1.84.
        Section 1.167 is proposed to be amended by removing and reserving 
    paragraph (b) as unnecessary in view of Sec. 1.132.
        Section 1.171 would no longer require an order for a title report 
    in reissue applications as the requirement for a certification on 
    behalf of all the assignees under concomitantly amended Sec. 1.172(a) 
    obviates the need for a title report and fee therefor. Section 1.171 is 
    also proposed to be amended by deletion of the requirement for an offer 
    to surrender the patent, which offer is seen to be redundant in view of 
    Sec. 1.178.
        Section 1.172 is proposed to be amended to require that all 
    assignees establish their ownership interest by submission of evidence 
    of the chain of title or by specifying where such evidence is recorded 
    in the Office.
        Section 1.175 relating to the content of the reissue oath or 
    declaration (MPEP 1414), as well as Secs. 1.48 and 1.324 relating to 
    correction of inventorship in an application and in a patent, 
    respectively, are proposed to be amended to remove the requirement for 
    a showing of a lack of deceptive intent based on facts and 
    circumstances. As the Office no longer investigates fraud and 
    inequitable conduct issues and a reissue applicant's statement of a 
    lack of deceptive intent is normally accepted on its face (See MPEP 
    1448), the current requirement in Sec. 1.175(a)(5) that it be shown how 
    the error(s) being relied upon arose or occurred without deceptive 
    intent on the part of the applicant appears to be unduly burdensome 
    upon applicants and the Office, and is proposed to be deleted. This 
    would apply to the initially identified error(s), under paragraph (a), 
    and any subsequently identified error(s) under paragraph (b). An 
    initial reissue oath or declaration would be required to be filed 
    pursuant to Sec. 1.175(a) limited to identification of the cause(s) of 
    the reissue, and stating generally that all errors being corrected in 
    the reissue application at the time of filing of the oath or 
    declaration arose without deceptive intent. The current practice under 
    Sec. 1.175(a)(3) and (a)(5) of specifically identifying all errors 
    being corrected at the time of filing the initial oath or declaration 
    would not be retained.
        Paragraph (b)(1) of Sec. 1.175 would require a supplemental reissue 
    oath or declaration for errors corrected that were not covered by an 
    earlier presented reissue oath or declaration, such as the initial oath 
    or declaration pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section or one 
    submitted subsequent thereto (a supplemental oath or declaration under 
    this paragraph), stating generally that all errors being corrected 
    which are not covered by an earlier presented oath or declaration 
    pursuant to paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section arose without any 
    deceptive intention on the part of the applicant. A supplemental oath 
    or declaration that refers to all errors that are being corrected, 
    including errors covered by a reissue oath or declaration submitted 
    pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, would be acceptable. The 
    specific requirement for a supplemental reissue oath or declaration to 
    cover errors sought to be corrected subsequent to the filing of an 
    initial reissue oath or declaration is not a new practice, but merely 
    recognition of a current requirement for a supplemental reissue oath or 
    declaration when additional errors are to be corrected. However, the 
    current practice of specifically identifying all supplemental errors 
    being corrected in a supplemental reissue oath or declaration would not 
    be retained.
        A supplemental oath or declaration under paragraph (b)(1) would be 
    required to be submitted prior to allowance. The supplemental oath or 
    declaration may be submitted with any amendment prior to allowance, 
    paragraph (b)(1)(i), or in order to overcome a rejection under 35 
    U.S.C. 251 made by the examiner where there are errors sought to be 
    corrected that are not covered by a previously filed reissue oath or 
    declaration, paragraph (b)(1)(ii). Any such rejection by the examiner 
    will include a statement that the rejection may be overcome by 
    submission of a supplemental oath or declaration, which oath or 
    declaration states that the errors in issue arose without any deceptive 
    intent on the part of the applicant. A supplemental oath or declaration 
    under paragraph (b) would only be required for errors sought to be 
    corrected during prosecution of the reissue application. Where an 
    Office action contains only a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 251 and 
    indicates that a supplemental oath or declaration under this paragraph 
    would overcome the rejection, applicants are encouraged to authorize 
    the payment of the issue fee at the time the supplemental reissue oath 
    or declaration is submitted in view of the clear likelihood that the 
    reissue application will be allowed on the next Office action. Such 
    authorization will reduce the delays in the Office awaiting receipt of 
    the issue fee. Where there are no errors to be corrected over those 
    already covered by an oath or declaration submitted under paragraphs 
    (a) and (b)(1) of this section, e.g., the application is allowed on 
    first action, or where a supplemental oath or declaration has been 
    submitted prior to allowance and no further errors have been corrected, 
    a supplemental oath or declaration under this paragraph, or additional 
    supplemental oath or declaration under paragraph (b)(1), would not be 
    required.
        Paragraph (b)(2) would provide that for any error sought to be 
    corrected after allowance, e.g., under Sec. 1.312, a supplemental oath 
    or declaration must accompany the requested correction stating that the 
    error(s) to be corrected arose without any deceptive intent on the part 
    of the applicant.
        The quotes around lack of deceptive intent in Sec. 1.175(a)(6) 
    would be removed as the exact language would not be required. Section 
    1.175(a)(7), referencing Sec. 1.56, is proposed to be removed as 
    unnecessary in view of the reference to Sec. 1.56 in Sec. 1.63 that is 
    also referred to by Sec. 1.175(a). Section 1.175(b) noting the ability 
    of applicant to file affidavits or declarations of others and the 
    ability of the examiner to require additional information would be 
    deleted as unnecessary in view of Sec. 1.132 and 35 U.S.C 132. A 
    reference to Sec. 1.53(b) would be inserted in newly proposed 
    Sec. 1.175(c) to clarify that the initial oath or declaration under 
    Sec. 1.175(a) including those requirements under Sec. 1.63 need not be 
    submitted (with the specification, drawing and claims) in order to 
    obtain a filing date.
        37 CFR 1.176 would be amended to permit the Office to require 
    restriction between claims added in a reissue application and the 
    original patent claims, where the claims added in the reissue 
    application are separate and distinct from the original patent claims.
    
    [[Page 49837]]
    
    This change is provided to deal with the added examination burden which 
    results when new inventions are added via the reissue application. The 
    Office would continue to not require restriction between original 
    claims of the patent, i.e., between claims that were in the patent 
    prior to filing the reissue application. In order for restriction to be 
    required between the original patent claims and the newly added claims, 
    the newly added claims must be separate and distinct from the original 
    patent claims. Restriction between multiple inventions in the newly 
    added claims would also be possible provided the newly added claims are 
    drawn towards separate and distinct inventions.
        Section 1.177 is proposed to be amended to discontinue the current 
    practice that copending reissue applications must be issued 
    simultaneously unless ordered otherwise by the Commissioner pursuant to 
    petition.
        Section 1.177 is proposed to be further amended by creating 
    paragraphs (a) through (d) to clarify when multiple reissue patents may 
    be issued and the conditions that applicant must comply with in order 
    to have the Commissioner exercise his or her discretion and authorize 
    issuance of multiple reissue patents. The Commissioner has discretion 
    pursuant 35 U.S.C. 251 to permit the issuance of multiple reissue 
    patents for distinct and separate parts of the thing patented. The 
    Commissioner will exercise his or her statutory discretion under the 
    limited conditions set forth in paragraph (a) of this section. Absent 
    compliance with the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, as 
    defined by paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, the Commissioner 
    will not exercise his or her discretion under the statute and will not 
    permit the issuance of multiple reissue applications, as is set forth 
    in paragraph (d) of this section.
        The conditions for the Commissioner to exercise his or her 
    discretion and permit multiple reissue patents to be issued for 
    distinct and separate parts of the thing patented set forth in 
    paragraph (a) of this section are as follows: (1) Copending reissue 
    applications for distinct and separate parts of the thing patented have 
    been filed, (2) Applicant has filed in each copending reissue 
    application a timely demand by way of petition for multiple reissue 
    patents, (3) The required filing and issue fees for each copending 
    reissue application have been paid, and (4) The petition for multiple 
    reissue patents is granted prior to issuance of a reissue patent on any 
    of the copending reissue applications.
        Paragraph (b) of Sec. 1.177 would set forth the requirements of the 
    petition provided for in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, which 
    requirements are: (1) A request for the issuance of multiple reissue 
    patents for distinct and separate parts of the thing patented, (2) The 
    petition fee pursuant to Sec. 1.17(i), (3) An identification of the 
    other copending reissue application(s), (4) A statement that the 
    inventions as claimed in the copending reissue applications are 
    distinct and separate parts of the thing patented, and (5) A showing 
    sufficient to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that 
    the claimed subject matter of the thing patented is in fact being 
    divided into distinct and separate parts.
        The ``distinct and separate parts of the thing patented'' means two 
    things: (1) That the thing patented is being proposed to be divided 
    into separate parts, i.e., the claims in the original patent are being 
    separated into different reissue applications, and (2) that the divided 
    claims are distinct as set forth in MPEP 802.01.
        Items (4) and (5) are intended to cover those situations where the 
    Commissioner can and has determined, based on material and/or 
    information supplied by applicant, or otherwise, that the subject 
    matter of the thing patented is in fact being separated into parts that 
    are distinct.
        The Commissioner intends to delegate the authority for decisions on 
    the petitions required under this section to the Group Directors of the 
    groups where the copending reissue applications are pending.
        Paragraph (c) of Sec. 1.177 would define the timeliness 
    requirements for submission of the petitions set forth in paragraph 
    (a)(1) of this section. When the copending reissue applications are 
    filed at the same time, the petitions must be filed no later than the 
    earliest submission of the reissue oath or declaration under 
    Sec. 1.175(a) for any of the copending reissue applications. When the 
    copending reissue applications are filed at different times, the 
    petitions must be filed no later than the earliest of: (1) Payment of 
    the issue fee for any of the copending reissue applications, or (2) 
    submission of the reissue oath or declaration under Sec. 1.175 in the 
    later filed copending reissue application.
        Paragraph (d) of Sec. 1.177 sets forth that the Commissioner will 
    not permit multiple reissue patents to be issued if the requirements of 
    this section are not met.
        It is contemplated that where the requirements of paragraphs (a) 
    and (b) of Sec. 1.177 are capable of being perfected, the Office will 
    give a one-month time period for perfection, with extensions of time 
    available under Sec. 1.136(a). Where a first copending reissue 
    application has issued, however, perfection would not be possible. It 
    is not the intent of the Commissioner to provide any possibility of 
    review by way of appeal to the Board of Patent Appeals and 
    Interferences from his or her determination that the requirements of 
    this section have not been complied with. Review of determinations on 
    questions as to whether it has been established that the copending 
    reissue applications are for distinct and separate parts of the thing 
    patented will be by way of petition under Sec. 1.181(a)(3) and 
    subsequently to court as to whether the Commissioner, or his or her 
    designate, has properly exercised the discretion provided by 35 U.S.C. 
    251 as is now proposed to be implemented in Sec. 1.177.
        The proposed changes are not intended to affect the type of errors 
    that are or are not appropriate for correction under 35 U.S.C. 251, 
    e.g., a patent granted on elected claims will not be considered to be 
    partially inoperative by reason of claiming less than they had a right 
    to claim and applicant's failure to timely file a divisional 
    application is not considered to be the type of error that can be 
    corrected by a reissue. MPEP 1402 and 1450.
        Section 1.177 is also proposed to be clarified by a new more 
    descriptive title in view of the substantive amendments and a reference 
    to the statutory authority.
        Section 1.181 is proposed to be amended by removing paragraphs (d), 
    (e) and (g) as unnecessary and at most representing internal 
    instructions.
        Section 1.182 is proposed to be amended by providing that a 
    petition under the section may be granted ``subject to such other 
    requirements as may be imposed'' by the Commissioner, language similar 
    to that appearing for petitions under Sec. 1.183. The section would 
    have removed as unnecessary a statement that a decision on a petition 
    thereunder will be communicated to interested parties in writing.
        Section 1.184 is proposed to be removed and reserved as 
    representing internal instructions.
        Section 1.191 would be amended, to provide for an appeal only after 
    the claims of an applicant or a patent owner of a patent under 
    reexamination are twice rejected, by deletion of appeal after having 
    received a final rejection. The reference to a final rejection is 
    deemed unnecessary in view of the proposed amendment to Sec. 1.113 by 
    addition of paragraph (c) prohibiting a first action final rejection. 
    An appeal
    
    [[Page 49838]]
    
    would not then be appropriate in any application including reissue and 
    continued prosecution (Sec. 1.53(b)(3)) applications or in a patent 
    under reexamination unless that application or that patent under 
    reexamination in which an appeal is filed has been twice rejected, 
    particularly in view of the elimination of first action final 
    rejections. A second rejection need not be a final rejection for an 
    appeal to be taken as is currently the practice. However, an applicant 
    or patent owner of a patent under reexamination would not be able to 
    appeal after a first action rejection in a continuation, divisional or 
    continued prosecution application as no first action would be a final 
    rejection and the only basis to appeal would be that the claims of an 
    applicant or patent owner of a patent under reexamination have been 
    twice rejected in the same application or the same patent under 
    reexamination.
        Section 1.191, paragraph (a), would be amended for conformance with 
    the language of 35 U.S.C. 134 by replacement of ``the claims of which 
    have'' by ``whose claims have.'' Section 1.191 would also be amended by 
    replacement of ``response'' with ``reply'' in accordance with the 
    proposed change to Sec. 1.111.
        Sections 1.192, 1.193, 1.194, 1.196, and 1.197 are proposed to be 
    amended to change ``the appellant'' to ``appellant'' for consistency. 
    Paragraph (a) of Sec. 1.192 would be amended by replacement of 
    ``response'' with ``reply'' in accordance with the proposed change to 
    Sec. 1.111.
        Section 1.193 would be amended in its title by addition of ``and 
    substitute brief'' to more accurately reflect the section's contents. 
    Section 1.193 would also be amended, by revision of paragraph (a) into 
    paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) and revision of paragraph (b) into 
    paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2). Paragraph (a)(1) would retain the subject 
    matter of current paragraph (a). Paragraph (a)(2) would specifically 
    prohibit the inclusion of a new ground of rejection in an examiner's 
    answer.
        Paragraph (b)(1) would remove the current discretion under existing 
    paragraph (b) of this section of the examiner to enter a new ground of 
    rejection in an examiner's answer responding to an appeal in 
    conformance with proposed paragraph (a)(2). Paragraph (b)(1) would 
    require the examiner to reopen prosecution to enter any new ground of 
    rejection. Reopening of prosecution would require entering of any 
    previously submitted paper that has been refused entry.
        Paragraph (b)(1) of Sec. 1.193 would also provide appellant with a 
    right to file a substitute appeal brief in compliance with Sec. 1.192 
    in reply to an examiner's answer where the right to file a substitute 
    appeal brief would not be dependent upon a new point of argument being 
    present in the examiner's answer. The current practice of permitting 
    reply briefs based solely on a finding of a new point of argument, as 
    set forth in current paragraph (b), would be eliminated thereby 
    preventing present controversies as to whether a new point of argument 
    has been made by the primary examiner. Appellant would be assured of 
    having the last submission prior to review by the Board. Upon receipt 
    of a substitute appeal brief the examiner would either acknowledge its 
    receipt and entry or reopen prosecution to respond to any new issues 
    raised in the substitute appeal brief. Should the Board desire to 
    remand the appeal to the primary examiner for comment on the latest 
    submission by appellant or to clarify an examiner's answer, MPEP 
    1211,1211.01, and 1212, appellant would be entitled to submit a 
    substitute appeal brief in response to the reply by the examiner to the 
    Board's inquiry, which reply would be by way of a substitute examiner's 
    answer. The use of substitute appeal briefs and substitute examiner's 
    answers is intended to provide the Board with a single most current 
    paper from each party.
        Paragraph (b)(2) of Sec. 1.193 would provide that if appellant 
    desires that the appeal process be reinstated in reply to the 
    examiner's reopening of prosecution under paragraph (b)(1) of this 
    section, appellant would be able to file a new appeal brief under 
    Sec. 1.192 and a request to reinstate the appeal. Amendments, 
    affidavits or other new evidence would not be entered if submitted with 
    a request to reinstate the appeal. Reinstatement of the appeal would 
    constitute a new notice of appeal but no additional appeal fees would 
    be required, since such fees have been previously paid. The intent of 
    the rule change is to give appellant (rather than the examiner) the 
    option to continue the appeal if desired (particularly under a 20 year 
    term), or to continue prosecution before the examiner in the face of a 
    new ground of rejection. Should an appeal brief be elected as the 
    response to the examiner reopening prosecution based on a new ground of 
    rejection under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the examiner may 
    under paragraph (a)(1) of this section issue an examiner's answer.
        Section 1.194, paragraph (b), is proposed to be amended to provide 
    that a request for an oral hearing must be filed in a separate paper.
        Section 1.194, paragraph (c), is proposed to be amended to provide 
    that appellant will be notified when a requested oral hearing is 
    unnecessary, e.g., a remand is required.
        Section 1.196, paragraphs (b) and (d), are proposed to be combined 
    by amending paragraph (b) to specifically provide in paragraph (b) for 
    a new ground of rejection for both appealed claims and for allowed 
    claims present in an application containing claims that have been 
    appealed rather than the current practice under paragraph (d) of 
    recommending a rejection of allowed claims that is binding on the 
    examiner. The effect of an explicit rejection of an allowed claim by 
    the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences is not seen to differ 
    from a recommendation of a rejection and would serve to advance the 
    prosecution of the application by having the rejection made at an 
    earlier date by the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences rather 
    than waiting for the application to be forwarded and acted upon by the 
    examiner. The current practice, that the examiner is not bound by the 
    rejection should appellant elect to proceed under paragraph (b)(1) and 
    an amendment or showing of facts not previously of record in the 
    opinion of the examiner overcomes the new ground of rejection, is not 
    proposed to be changed. A period of two months would now explicitly be 
    set forth for a reply to a decision by the Board of Patent Appeals and 
    Interferences containing a new ground of rejection pursuant to 
    Sec. 1.196(b), which would alter the one month now set forth for 
    replies to recommended rejections of previously allowed claims. MPEP 
    1214.01, page 1200-28. Extensions of time would continue to be governed 
    by Sec. 1.196(f) and Sec. 1.136(b) (and not by Sec. 1.136(a)).
        The last sentence of paragraph (b)(2) of Sec. 1.196 would be 
    amended to clarify that appellants do not have to both appeal and file 
    request for reconsideration where only a reconsideration of a portion 
    of the decision is sought in that a decision on a request for 
    reconsideration will incorporate the earlier decision for purposes of 
    appeal of the earlier decision for which only a partial request for 
    reconsideration may have been filed. Additionally it is clarified that 
    decisions on reconsideration are final unless noted otherwise in the 
    decision in that under some circumstances it may not be appropriate to 
    make a decision on reconsideration final as is currently automatically 
    provided for.
        Section 1.196 would have a new paragraph (d) providing the Board of 
    Patent Appeals and Interferences with explicit authority to have an 
    appellant
    
    [[Page 49839]]
    
    clarify the record in addition to what is already provided by way of 
    remand to the examiner, MPEP 1211, and appellant's compliance with the 
    requirements of an appeal brief, Sec. 1.192(d). Paragraph (d)(1) would 
    provide that an appellant may be required to address any matter that is 
    deemed appropriate for a reasoned decision on the pending appeal. Such 
    matters would include:
        (1) The applicability of particular case law that has not been 
    previously identified as relevant to an issue in the appeal,
        (2) The applicability of prior art that has not been made of 
    record, and
        (3) The availability of particular test data that would be 
    persuasive in rebutting a ground of rejection.
        Paragraph (d)(2) would provide that appellant would be given a time 
    limit within which to reply to any inquiry under paragraph (d)(1) of 
    this section. Time limits, unlike time periods for reply, are not 
    extendable under Sec. 1.136(a).
        Section 1.197, paragraph (b), is proposed to be amended to provide 
    a period of two months, rather than the one month currently provided, 
    for the single request for reconsideration or modification of the Board 
    decision as provided for in Sec. 1.197(b).
        Section 1.291, paragraph (c), is proposed to be amended by removing 
    the blanket limitation of one protest per protestor and would provide 
    for a second or subsequent submission in the form of additional prior 
    art. Mere argument that is later submitted by an initial protestor 
    would continue not to be entered and returned unless it is shown that 
    the argument relates to a new issue that could not have been earlier 
    raised. MPEP 1907(b). Although, later submitted prior art would be made 
    of record by a previous protestor without a showing that it relates to 
    a new issue, it should be noted that entry of later submitted prior art 
    in the file record does not assure its consideration by the examiner if 
    submitted late in the examination process. Accordingly, initial 
    protests should be as complete as possible when first filed.
        In view of the proposed change to Sec. 1.291(a) of this section in 
    the 18-Month Publication Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, discussed 
    supra, e.g., at Sec. 1.62 of the preamble, limiting the filing of 
    protests to the issuance of patents to particular time periods (none 
    after the notice of allowance is mailed, none after two months from 
    publication or the filing of protests with a fee during the two-month 
    period from publication where a notice of allowance has not been 
    mailed), the restriction of protests by number is deemed unnecessary 
    and is recognized as ineffective in that the current rule may allow for 
    more than one protest to be filed on behalf of a party.
        Section 1.291 paragraph (c) would be amended by replacement of 
    ``response'' with ``reply'' in accordance with the proposed change to 
    Sec. 1.111.
        Section 1.294 paragraph (b) would be amended by replacement of 
    ``response'' with ``reply'' in accordance with the proposed change to 
    Sec. 1.111.
        Section 1.304(a)(1) is proposed to be amended to replace 
    ``consideration'' by ``reconsideration,'' an error that resulted from 
    mistyping when it first appeared in the Federal Register.
        Section 1.312, paragraph (b), is proposed to have a reference to 
    Sec. 1.175(b) added in view of the proposed change in Sec. 1.175(b) 
    referencing Sec. 1.312(b).
        Section 1.313 is proposed to be amended by the addition of 
    paragraph (c) informing applicants that unless written notification is 
    received that the application has been withdrawn from issue at least 
    two weeks prior to the projected date of issue, applicants should 
    expect that the application will issue as a patent. Once an application 
    has issued, the Office is without authority to grant a request under 
    Sec. 1.313 notwithstanding submission of the request prior to issuance 
    of the patent.
        Sections 1.316 (b) through (f) are proposed to be removed as they 
    would be combined in proposed Sec. 1.137.
        Sections 1.317 (b) through (f) are proposed to be removed as they 
    would be combined in proposed Sec. 1.137.
        Section 1.318 is proposed to be removed and reserved as being an 
    internal Office instruction.
        Section 1.324 is proposed to be amended by creating paragraphs (a) 
    and (b). The requirement for factual showings to establish a lack of 
    deceptive intent would be deleted, with a statement to that effect 
    being sufficient, paragraph (a).
        As Office practice (MPEP 1481) is to require the same type and 
    character of proof of facts as in petitions under Sec. 1.48(a), a 
    showing of diligence proposed to be deleted in Sec. 1.48 would not be 
    continued in either Sec. 1.48 or Sec. 1.324, which currently follows 
    the requirements of Sec. 1.48. The applicability of a rejection under 
    35 U.S.C. 102(f)/(g) against a patent with the wrong inventorship set 
    forth therein is deemed to provide sufficient motivation for prompt 
    correction of the inventorship without the need for a separate 
    requirement for diligence.
        The parties set forth in 35 U.S.C. 256 are interpreted to be only 
    the person named as an inventor or not named as an inventor through 
    error. Accordingly, Sec. 1.324 is proposed to be amended, paragraph 
    (b)(1), to explicitly require a statement relating to the lack of 
    deceptive intent only from each person who is being added or deleted as 
    an inventor, as opposed to the current practice of requiring a 
    statement from each original named inventor and any inventor to be 
    added.
        The current requirements for an oath or declaration under Sec. 1.63 
    by each actual inventor would be replaced, paragraph (b)(2) of 
    Sec. 1.324, by a statement from the current named inventors who have 
    not submitted a statement under paragraph (b)(1) of Sec. 1.324 either 
    agreeing to the change of inventorship or stating that they have no 
    disagreement in regard to the requested change. Not every original 
    named inventor would necessarily have knowledge of each of the 
    contributions of the other inventors and/or how the inventorship error 
    occurred, in which case their lack of disagreement to the requested 
    change would be sufficient.
        Paragraph (b)(3) of Sec. 1.324 would require the written consent of 
    the assignees of all parties who submitted a statement under paragraph 
    (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this section similar to the current practice of 
    consents by the assignees of all the existing patentees. A 
    clarification reference to Sec. 3.73(b) has been added.
        Paragraph (b)(4) of Sec. 1.324 states the requirement for a 
    petition fee as set forth in Sec. 1.20(b).
        Section 1.325 relating to mistakes not corrected is proposed to be 
    removed and reserved as unnecessary in that mistakes cannot be 
    corrected unless a basis for their correction is found.
        Sections 1.351 and 1.352 are proposed to be removed and reserved as 
    unnecessary in that they are internal instructions.
        Section 1.366, paragraph (b), would have the term ``certificate'' 
    removed as unnecessary. Paragraph (c) would be clarified by changing 
    ``serial number'' to ``application number'' which consists of the 
    serial number and the series code (e.g., ``08/''). Paragraph (d) would 
    have the suggested requirements for the patent issue date and the 
    application filing date removed as unnecessary in that the patent 
    number is sufficient to identify the file and the change parallels an 
    intended deletion of these dates from forms PTO/SB/45 and PTO/SB/47. 
    The term ``serial'' would be removed from paragraph (d).
        Section 1.377, paragraph (c), would be amended to remove the 
    requirement
    
    [[Page 49840]]
    
    that the petition be verified in accordance with the proposed change to 
    Sec. 1.4(d)(2).
        Section 1.378, paragraph (d), would be amended to remove the 
    requirement that the statement be verified in accordance with the 
    proposed change to Sec. 1.4(d)(2).
        Section 1.425 would be amended by removing paragraph (a) and its 
    requirement for: Proof of the pertinent facts, which relates to the 
    lack of cooperation or unavailability of the inventor for which status 
    is sought and by deleting paragraph (b) and its requirements for: Proof 
    of the pertinent facts, the presence of a sufficient proprietary 
    interest, and a showing that such action is necessary to preserve the 
    rights of the parties or to prevent irreparable damage. Additionally, 
    the requirement that the last known address of the non-signing inventor 
    be stated would be removed. The current requirements are thought to be 
    unnecessary in view of the need for submission of the same information 
    in a petition under 37 CFR 1.47 during the national stage. The 
    paragraph to be added would parallel the requirement in PCT Rule 4.15 
    for a statement explaining to the satisfaction of the Commissioner the 
    lack of the signature concerned.
        Section 1.484, paragraphs (d) through (f), would be amended by 
    replacement of ``response'' and ``respond'' with ``reply'' in 
    accordance with the proposed change to Sec. 1.111.
        Section 1.485 paragraph (a) would be amended by replacement of 
    ``response'' with ``reply'' in accordance with the proposed change to 
    Sec. 1.111.
        Section 1.488, paragraph (b), would be amended by replacement of 
    ``response'' with ``reply'' in accordance with the proposed change to 
    Sec. 1.111.
        Section 1.492 proposed to be amended to add new paragraph (g).
        Section 1.494, paragraph (c), would be amended by replacement of 
    ``response'' with ``reply'' in accordance with the proposed change to 
    Sec. 1.111.
        Section 1.495, paragraph (c)(2), would be amended by replacement of 
    ``response'' with ``reply'' in accordance with the proposed change to 
    Sec. 1.111.
        Section 1.510, paragraph (e), would be amended to replace a 
    reference to Sec. 1.121(f), in view of it proposed removal, with a 
    reference to Sec. 1.530(d) in view of its proposed revision.
        Section 1.530 the title and paragraph (a) would be amended by 
    replacement of ``amendment'' and ``response'' with ``reply'' in 
    accordance with the proposed change to Sec. 1.111.
        Section 1.530, paragraph (d), would be replaced by paragraphs 
    (d)(1) through (d)(6) removing the reference to Sec. 1.121(f) in 
    accordance with the proposed deletion of Sec. 1.121(f). The manner of 
    making amendments in reexamination proceeding under the current 
    reexamination practice is governed by Sec. 1.530 (d)(1) through (d)(6). 
    Paragraph (d) would apply to proposed amendments in reexamination 
    proceedings. Paragraph (d)(1) would be directed to the manner of 
    proposing amendments in the specification other than in the claims. 
    Paragraph (d)(1)(i) would require the precise point to be indicated 
    where a proposed amendment is to be made. Paragraph (d)(1)(ii) would 
    require that all amendments including deletions be made by submission 
    of a copy of the rewritten paragraph(s) with markings. A change in one 
    sentence, paragraph, or page that results in only format changes to 
    other pages not being amended are not to be submitted. Paragraph 
    (d)(1)(iii) would require proposed amendments to the specification to 
    be made by rewritten relative to the patent specification and not 
    relative to a previous proposed amendment. Paragraph (d)(1)(iv) would 
    define the markings set forth in paragraph (d)(1)(ii).
        Paragraph (d)(2) of Sec. 1.530 would relate to the manner of 
    proposing amendment of the claims in reexamination proceedings. 
    Paragraph (d)(2)(i)(A) would require that a proposed amendment include 
    the entire text of each patent claim which is proposed to be amended, 
    but not all pending claims, such as patent claims that have not been 
    proposed to be amended. Additionally, provision would be made for the 
    cancellation of patent or of a proposed claim by a direction to cancel 
    without the need for marking by brackets. Compare with deletion of 
    claims in reissue applications where only patent claims and not added 
    claims may be cancelled by direction, paragraph (b)(2)(i)(A). Paragraph 
    (b)(2)(i)(B) would prohibit the renumbering of the patent claims and 
    require that any proposed added claims follow the number of the highest 
    numbered patent claim. Paragraph (b)(2)(i)(C) would identify the type 
    of markings required by paragraph (d)(2)(i)(A), single underlining for 
    added material and single brackets for material deleted.
        Paragraph (d)(2)(ii) would require the patent owner to set forth 
    the status of all patent claims, of all currently proposed claims, and 
    of all previously proposed claims that are no longer being proposed as 
    of the date of submission of each proposed amendment. Compare with 
    Sec. 1.121(b)(2)(ii), which does not require the status of patent 
    claims that were not amended or of added claims that were cancelled.
        Paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of Sec. 1.530 would require an explanation of 
    the support in the disclosure for any proposed first-time amendments to 
    the claims on pages separate from the amendments along with any 
    additional comments. The absence of an explanation would result in an 
    incomplete reply, 35 U.S.C. 135.
        Paragraph (d)(2)(iv) of Sec. 1.530 would require that each 
    submission of a proposed amendment to any claim (patent claims and all 
    proposed claims) requires copies of all proposed amendments to the 
    claims as of the date of the submission. A copy of a previous amendment 
    would not meet the requirement of this section in that all amendments 
    must be represented, as only the last amendment will be used for 
    printing. A copy of a patent claim that has not been proposed to be 
    amended is not to be presented.
        Paragraph (d)(2)(v) of Sec. 1.530 would provide that the failure to 
    submit a copy of any proposed added claim would be construed as a 
    direction to cancel that claim.
        Paragraph (d)(3) of Sec. 1.530 would clarify that: (1) A proposed 
    amendment may not enlarge the scope of the claims of the patent, (2) 
    that no amendment may be proposed in an expired patent, and (3) no 
    amendment will be incorporated into the patent by certificate issued 
    after the expiration of the patent.
        Paragraph (d)(4) of Sec. 1.530 would clarify that amendments 
    proposed to a patent during reexamination proceedings will not be 
    effective until a reexamination certificate is issued.
        Paragraph (d)(5) of Sec. 1.530 would provide the specifications 
    that the form of papers must comply with in reexamination proceedings, 
    e.g., paper size must be either letter size or A4 size (and not legal 
    size).
        Paragraph (d)(6) of Sec. 1.530 would clarify that proposed 
    amendments to the patent drawings are not permitted and that any change 
    must be by way of a new sheet of drawings with the proposed amended 
    figures being identified as ``amended'' and with proposed added figures 
    identified as ``new'' for each sheet that has changed.
        Section 1.550, paragraphs (a), (b), and (d), would be amended by 
    replacement of ``response,'' ``responses'' and ``respond'' with 
    ``reply'' in accordance with the proposed change to Sec. 1.111.
        Section 1.560, paragraph (b), would be amended by replacement of 
    ``response'' with ``reply'' in accordance with the proposed change to 
    Sec. 1.111.
        Section 1.770 would be amended by replacement of ``response'' with 
    ``reply''
    
    [[Page 49841]]
    
    in accordance with the proposed change to Sec. 1.111.
        Section 1.785 would be amended by replacement of ``response'' with 
    ``reply'' in accordance with the proposed change to Sec. 1.111.
        Section 1.804, paragraph (b), would be clarified grammatically by 
    changing ``shall state'' to ``stating'' and would be amended to delete 
    the requirement that the statement be verified in accordance with the 
    proposed change to Sec. 1.4(d)(2).
        Section 1.805, paragraph (c), would be amended by replacement of 
    ``verified'' with ``statement'' in accordance with the proposed change 
    to Sec. 1.111 and removing unnecessary language noting that an attorney 
    or agent registered to practice need not verify their statements.
        Portions of part 3 are proposed to be amended to incorporate part 7 
    that is proposed to be removed and reserved.
        Section 3.11(a) is proposed to be created for the current subject 
    matter and a new paragraph (b) would be added citing Executive Order 
    9424 and its requirements by several departments and other executive 
    agencies of the Government for forwarding items for recording.
        Section 3.26 would be amended to remove the requirement that 
    English language translation be verified in accordance with the 
    proposed change to Sec. 1.4(d)(2).
        Section 3.27(a) is proposed to be added to include current subject 
    matter and an exception for Sec. 3.27(b) that would be added citing 
    Executive Order 9424 and a mailing address therefor.
        Section 3.31(c) is proposed to be added to require that the cover 
    sheet must indicate that the document is to be recorded on the 
    governmental register and if applicable that the document is to be 
    recorded on the Secret Register and that the document will not affect 
    title.
        Section 3.41(a) is proposed to be added for the current subject 
    matter and a Sec. 3.41(b) added to note when no recording fee is 
    required in Sec. 3.41(b)(1) through (3) when it is required by 
    Executive Order 9424.
        Section 3.51 is proposed to be amended by removing the term 
    ``certification'' as unnecessary in accordance with the proposed change 
    to Sec. 1.4(d)(2).
        Section 3.58 is proposed to be added to provide for the maintaining 
    of a Department Register to record Government interests required by 
    Executive Order 9424 in Sec. 3.58(a). New Sec. 3.58(b) would provide 
    that the Office maintain a Secret Register to record Government 
    interests also required by the Executive Order.
        Section 3.73(b) is proposed to be amended to remove the sentence 
    requiring an assignee to specifically state that the evidentiary 
    documents have been reviewed and to certify that title is in the 
    assignee seeking to take action. The sentence is deemed to be 
    unnecessary in view of the proposed amendment to Sec. 1.4(d). Section 
    3.73(b) has been clarified by addition of a reference to an example of 
    documentary evidence that can be submitted.
        Section 5.1 is proposed to be amended by removing the current 
    subject matter as being duplicative of material in the other sections 
    of this part and to be replaced by subject matter proposed to be 
    deleted from Sec. 5.33.
        Section 5.2(b) through (d) are proposed to be removed as repetitive 
    of material in the sections following with Sec. 5.2(b) being replaced 
    with subject matter of the first sentence from Sec. 5.7.
        Section 5.3 would be amended by replacement of ``response'' with 
    ``reply'' in accordance with the proposed change to Sec. 1.111.
        Section 5.4 is proposed to be amended by removing unnecessary 
    subject matter from paragraph (a), eliminating, in paragraph (d), the 
    requirement that the petition be verified in accordance with the 
    proposed amendment to Sec. 1.4(d)(2) and by adding the first sentence 
    of Sec. 5.8 to paragraph (d).
        Section 5.5 is proposed to be amended by removing unnecessary 
    subject matter from paragraph (b) and by replacing current Sec. 5.5(e) 
    with subject matter proposed to be removed from Sec. 5.6(a).
        Section 5.6 is proposed to be removed and reserved with the subject 
    matter of Sec. 5.6(a) being placed in proposed Sec. 5.5(e).
        Section 5.7 is proposed to be removed and reserved with the first 
    sentence thereof being placed in proposed Sec. 5.2(b).
        Section 5.8 is proposed to be removed and reserved with the subject 
    matter from the first sentence thereof being placed in proposed 
    Sec. 5.4(e).
        Sections 5.11 (b) and (c) are proposed to be amended to update the 
    references to other parts of the Code of Federal Regulations.
        Section 5.13 is proposed to be amended by removing the last two 
    sentences which are considered to be unnecessary.
        Section 5.14(a) is proposed to be amended by removing unnecessary 
    subject matter and replacing ``serial number'' with the more 
    appropriate designation ``application number''.
        Section 5.15(a) is proposed to be amended by removing unnecessary 
    subject matter and to update the references to other parts of the Code 
    of Federal Regulations.
        Section 5.16 is proposed to be removed and reserved as unnecessary.
        Section 5.17 is proposed to be removed and reserved as unnecessary.
        Section 5.18 is proposed to be amended to update the references to 
    other parts of the Code of Federal Regulations.
        Sections 5.19 (a) and (b) are proposed to be amended to update the 
    references to other parts of the Code of Federal Regulations. Section 
    5.19(c) is proposed to be removed as unnecessary.
        Section 5.20(b) is proposed to be removed as unnecessary.
        Section 5.25(c) is proposed to be removed as unnecessary.
        Section 5.31 is proposed to be removed and reserved as unnecessary.
        Section 5.32 is proposed to be removed and reserved as unnecessary.
        Section 5.33 is proposed to be removed and reserved and the subject 
    matter added to Sec. 5.1.
        Part 7 is proposed to be removed and reserved as the substance 
    thereof has been incorporated into part 3.
    
    Compilation of Inquiries to Public
    
        The Supplementary Information portion and the preamble portion of 
    Sec. 1.137 request comments on the advisability of applying 
    retroactively provisions in the final rules to papers submitted prior 
    to the effective date of the final rule changes.
        The Sec. 1.121 portion of the preamble requests comments regarding 
    the advisability of harmonizing reissue practice with reexamination 
    practice.
        The Sec. 1.137(b) portion of the preamble requests comments on 
    alternatives as to the time period for submitting a petition 
    thereunder.
    
    Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
    
        This proposed rule contains information collection requirements 
    which are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget 
    (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The title, description 
    and respondent description of each of the information collections are 
    shown below with an estimate of each of the annual reporting burdens. 
    The collections of information in this proposed rule have been reviewed 
    and approved by, or are pending approval by the OMB under the following 
    control numbers: 0651-0035, 0651-0033, 0651-0031, 0651-0016, 0651-0032 
    and 0651-0027. Included in each estimate is the time for reviewing 
    instructions, gathering and maintaining the data
    
    [[Page 49842]]
    
    needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.
        With respect to the following collections of information, the 
    Office invites comments on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of 
    information is necessary for the proper performance of the Office's 
    functions, including whether the information will have practical 
    utility; (2) The accuracy of the Office's estimate of the burden of the 
    proposed collection of information, including the validity of the 
    methodology and assumptions used; (3) Ways to enhance the quality, 
    utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) Ways 
    to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, 
    including through the use of automated collection techniques, when 
    appropriate, and other forms of information technology.
        Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required 
    to respond to nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to 
    comply with a collection of information subject to the requirements of 
    the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information 
    displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    
        OMB Number: 0651-0035.
        Title: Address-Affecting Provisions.
        Form Numbers: PTO/SB/82/83.
        Type of Review: Pending OMB approval.
        Affected Public: Individuals or Households, Business or Other Non-
    Profit, Not-for-Profit Institutions and Federal Government.
        Estimated Number of Respondents: 44,850.
        Estimated Time Per Response: 0.2 hour.
        Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 8,970 hours.
        Needs and Uses: Under existing law, a patent applicant or assignee 
    may appoint, revoke or change a representative to act in a 
    representative capacity. Also, an appointed representative may withdraw 
    from acting in a representative capacity. This collection includes the 
    information needed to ensure that Office correspondence reaches the 
    appropriate individual.
    
        OMB Number: 0651-0033.
        Title: Post Allowance and Refiling.
        Form Numbers: PTO/SB/13/14/44/50-57; PTOL-85b.
        Type of Review: Pending OMB approval.
        Affected Public: Individuals or Households, Business or Other Non-
    Profit, Not-for-Profit Institutions and Federal Government.
        Estimated Number of Respondents: 165,900.
        Estimated Time Per Response: 0.382 hour.
        Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 63,400 hours.
        Needs and Uses: This collection of information is required to 
    administer the patent laws pursuant to Title 35 of the U.S. Code 
    concerning the issuance of patents and related actions including 
    correcting errors in printed patents, refiling of patent applications, 
    requesting reexamination of a patent, and requesting a reissue patent 
    to correct an error in a patent. The affected public includes any 
    individual or institution whose application for a patent has been 
    allowed or who takes action as covered by the applicable rules.
    
        OMB Number: 0651-0031.
        Title: Patent Processing (Updating).
        Form Numbers: PTO/SB/08-12/21-26/31/32/42/43/61-64/67-69/91-93/96/
    97.
        Type of Review: Pending OMB approval.
        Affected Public: Individuals or Households, Business or Other Non-
    Profit Institutions, Not-for-Profit Institutions and Federal 
    Government.
        Estimated Number of Respondents: 364,000.
        Estimated Time Per Response: 1.779 hours.
        Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 647,720 hours.
        Needs and Uses: During the processing for an application for a 
    patent, the applicant/agent may be required or desire to submit 
    additional information to the Office concerning the examination of a 
    specific application. The specific information required or which may be 
    submitted includes: Information Disclosure Citations; Terminal 
    Disclaimers; Petitions to Revive; Express Abandonment; Appeal Notice; 
    Small Entity; Petition for Access; Power to Inspect; Certificate of 
    Mailing; Amendment Transmittal Letter; Deposit Account Order Form.
    
        OMB Number: 0651-0016.
        Title: Rules for Patent Maintenance Fees.
        Form Numbers: PTO/SB/45/46/47/65/66.
        Type of Review: Pending OMB approval.
        Affected Public: Individuals or Households, Business or Other Non-
    Profit, Not-for-Profit Institutions and Federal Government.
        Estimated Number of Respondents: 273,800.
        Estimated Time Per Response: .08 hour.
        Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 22,640 hours.
        Needs and Uses: Maintenance fees are required to maintain a patent 
    in force under Title 35 of the U.S. Code. Payment of maintenance fees 
    are required at 3\1/2\, 7\1/2\ and 11\1/2\ years after the grant of the 
    patent. A patent number and serial number of the patent on which 
    maintenance fees are paid are required in order to ensure proper 
    crediting of such payments.
    
        OMB Number: 0651-0032.
        Title: Initial Patent Application.
        Form Number: PTO/SB/01-07/17-20/101-109.
        Type of Review: Currently approved through 9/98.
        Affected Public: Individuals or Households, Business or Other Non-
    Profit, Not-for-Profit Institutions and Federal Government.
        Estimated Number of Respondents: 221,000.
        Estimated Time Per Response: 10.8 hours.
        Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 2,387,000 hours.
        Needs and Uses: The purpose of this information collection is to 
    permit the Office to determine whether an application meets the 
    criteria set forth in the patent statutes and regulations. The standard 
    Fee Transmittal form, New Utility Patent Application Transmittal form, 
    New Design Patent Application Transmittal form, New Plant Patent 
    Application Transmittal form, Plant Color Coding Sheet, Declaration, 
    and Plant Patent Application Declaration will assist applicants in 
    complying with the requirements of the patent statutes and regulations, 
    and will further assist the Office in processing and examination of the 
    application.
    
        OMB Number: 0651-0027.
        Title: Changes in Patent and Trademark Assignment Practices.
        Form Numbers: PTO-1618 and PTO-1619, PTO/SB/15/41.
        Type of Review: Currently approved through 9/98.
        Affected Public: Individuals or households and businesses or other 
    for-profit institutions.
        Estimated Number of Respondents: 170,000.
        Estimated Time Per Response: 0.5 hour.
        Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 85,000 hours.
        Needs and Uses: The Office records about 170,000 assignments or 
    documents related to ownership of patent and trademark cases each year. 
    The Office requires a cover sheet to expedite the processing of these 
    documents and to ensure that they are properly recorded.
        As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
    
    [[Page 49843]]
    
    3507(d)), the Office has submitted a copy of this proposed rulemaking 
    to OMB for its review of these information collections. Interested 
    persons are requested to send comments regarding these information 
    collections, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the 
    Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB, New Executive 
    Office Bldg., 725 17th St. NW, rm. 10235, Washington, DC 20503, Attn: 
    Desk Officer for the Patent and Trademark Office.
        OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collections of 
    information contained in these proposed regulations between 30 and 60 
    days after publication of this document in the Federal Register. 
    Therefore, a comment to OMB is best assured of having its full effect 
    if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication. This does not affect 
    the deadline for the public to comment to the Office on the proposed 
    regulations.
    
    Other Considerations
    
        This proposed rule change is in conformity with the requirements of 
    the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), Executive Order 
    12612, and the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. 
    It has been determined that this rulemaking is not significant for the 
    purposes of Executive Order 12866.
        The Assistant General Counsel for Legislation and Regulation of the 
    Department of Commerce has certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy, 
    Small Business Administration that the proposed rule change would not 
    have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities 
    (Regulatory Flexibility Act, Pub. L. 96-354). The principal impact of 
    these proposed changes is to reduce the regulatory burden on the public 
    in filing patent applications and petitions therein.
        The PTO has determined that this proposed rule change has no 
    Federalism implications affecting the relationship between the National 
    Government and the States as outlined in Executive Order 12612.
    
    List of Subjects
    
    37 CFR Part 1
    
        Administrative practice and procedure, Deceptive intent, Inventions 
    and patents.
    
    37 CFR Part 3
    
        Administrative practice and procedure, Inventions and patents.
    
    37 CFR Part 5
    
        Inventions and patents, Licenses and exports, Secrecy.
    
    37 CFR Part 7
    
        Inventions and patents.
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 37 CFR parts 1, 3, 5 and 
    7 are proposed to be amended as follows, with removals indicated by 
    brackets ([ ]) and additions are indicated by arrows (> <): part="" 1--="" rules="" of="" practice="" in="" patent="" cases="" 1.="" the="" authority="" citation="" for="" part="" 1="" continues="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" authority:="" 35="" u.s.c.="" 6,="" 23,="" unless="" otherwise="" noted.="" 1a.="" section="" 1.4="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (d)="" and="" by="" adding="" paragraph="" (g)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.4="" nature="" of="" correspondence="" and="" signature="" requirements.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (d)="">(1)< each="" piece="" of="" correspondence,="" except="" as="" provided="" for="" in="" paragraphs="" (e)="" and="" (f)="" of="" this="" section,="" filed="" in="" a="" patent="" or="" trademark="" application,="" reexamination="" proceeding,="" patent="" file="" or="" trademark="" registration="" file,="" trademark="" opposition="" proceeding,="" trademark="" cancellation="" proceeding,="" or="" trademark="" concurrent="" use="" proceeding,="" which="" requires="" a="" person's="" signature,="" must="" either:="" [(1)]="">(i)< be="" an="" original,="" that="" is,="" have="" an="" original="" signature="" personally="" signed="" in="" permanent="" ink="" by="" that="" person;="" or="" [(2)]="">(ii)< be="" a="" copy,="" such="" as="" a="" photocopy="" or="" facsimile="" transmission="" (sec.="" 1.6(d)),="" of="" an="" original="">or of a copy of a copy<. in="" the="" event="" that="" a="" copy="" of="" the="" original="" is="" filed,="" the="" original="" should="" be="" retained="" as="" evidence="" of="" authenticity.="" if="" a="" question="" of="" authenticity="" arises,="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office="" may="" require="" submission="" of="" the="" original.="">(2) By presenting to the Office any paper the party submitting 
    such paper is certifying that to the best of the person's knowledge, 
    information and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the 
    circumstances that:
        (i) The paper is not being presented for any improper purpose, such 
    as to harass someone or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase 
    in the cost of prosecution before the Office;
        (ii) The claims and other legal contentions therein are warranted 
    by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for the extension, 
    modification, or reversal of existing law or the establishment of new 
    law;
        (iii) The allegations and other factual contentions have 
    evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, are likely to 
    have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further 
    investigation or discovery; and
        (iv) The denials of factual contentions are warranted on the 
    evidence, or if specifically so identified, are reasonably based on a 
    lack of information or belief.
        (3) Sanctions:
        (i) Violations of paragraphs (d)(2)(i) to (iv) of this section 
    after notice and reasonable opportunity to respond are subject to such 
    sanctions as are deemed appropriate by the Commissioner including 
    issuance of a Notice of Termination of Proceedings or return of papers; 
    and
        (ii) Whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the Patent 
    and Trademark Office knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or 
    covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact, or makes any 
    false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations, or makes 
    or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any 
    false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be subject to 
    the penalties set forth in 18 U.S.C. 1001, and may jeopardize the 
    validity or enforceability of the application or any patent issuing 
    thereon.< *="" *="" *="" *="" *="">(g) An applicant who has not made of record a registered attorney 
    or agent may be required to state whether assistance was received in 
    the preparation or prosecution of the patent application, for which any 
    compensation or consideration was given or charged, and if so, to 
    disclose the name or names of the person or persons providing such 
    assistance. Assistance includes the preparation for the applicant of 
    the specification and amendments or other papers to be filed in the 
    Patent and Trademark Office, as well as other assistance in such 
    matters, but does not include merely making drawings by draftsmen or 
    stenographic services in typing papers.< 2.="" section="" 1.6="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (e)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.6="" receipt="" of="" correspondence.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (e)="" interruptions="" in="" u.s.="" postal="" service.="" if="" interruptions="" or="" emergencies="" in="" the="" united="" states="" postal="" service="" which="" have="" been="" so="" designated="" by="" the="" commissioner="" occur,="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office="" will="" consider="" as="" filed="" on="" a="" particular="" date="" in="" the="" office="" any="" correspondence="" which="" is:="" (1)="" promptly="" filed="" after="" the="" ending="" of="" the="" designated="" interruption="" or="" emergency;="" and="" (2)="" accompanied="" by="" a="" statement="" indicating="" that="" such="" correspondence="" would="" have="" been="" filed="" on="" that="" particular="" [[page="" 49844]]="" date="" if="" it="" were="" not="" for="" the="" designated="" interruption="" or="" emergency="" in="" the="" united="" states="" postal="" service.="" [such="" statement="" must="" be="" a="" verified="" statement="" if="" made="" by="" a="" person="" other="" than="" a="" practitioner="" as="" defined="" in="" sec.="" 10.1(r)="" of="" this="" chapter.]="" 3.="" section="" 1.8="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (b)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.8="" certificate="" of="" mailing="" or="" transmission.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (b)="" in="" the="" event="" that="" correspondence="" is="" considered="" timely="" filed="" by="" being="" mailed="" or="" transmitted="" in="" accordance="" with="" paragraph="" (a)="" of="" this="" section,="" but="" not="" received="" in="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office,="" and="" the="" application="" is="" held="" to="" be="" abandoned="" or="" the="" proceeding="" dismissed,="" terminated,="" or="" decided="" with="" prejudice,="" the="" correspondence="" will="" be="" considered="" timely="" if="" the="" party="" who="" forwarded="" such="" correspondence:="" (1)="" informs="" the="" office="" of="" the="" previous="" mailing="" or="" transmission="" of="" the="" correspondence="" promptly="" after="" becoming="" aware="" that="" the="" office="" has="" no="" evidence="" of="" receipt="" of="" the="" correspondence,="" (2)="" supplies="" an="" additional="" copy="" of="" the="" previously="" mailed="" or="" transmitted="" correspondence="" and="" certificate,="" and="" (3)="" includes="" a="" statement="" which="" attests="" on="" a="" personal="" knowledge="" basis="" or="" to="" the="" satisfaction="" of="" the="" commissioner="" to="" the="" previous="" timely="" mailing="" or="" transmission.="" [such="" statement="" must="" be="" a="" verified="" statement="" if="" made="" by="" a="" person="" other="" than="" a="" practitioner="" as="" defined="" in="" sec.="" 10.1(r)="" of="" this="" chapter.]="" if="" the="" correspondence="" was="" sent="" by="" facsimile="" transmission,="" a="" copy="" of="" the="" sending="" unit's="" report="" confirming="" transmission="" may="" be="" used="" to="" support="" this="" statement.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 4.="" section="" 1.10="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (c)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.10="" filing="" of="" papers="" and="" fees="" by="" ``express="" mail''="" with="" certificate.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (c)="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office="" will="" accept="" the="" certificate="" of="" mailing="" by="" ``express="" mail''="" and="" accord="" the="" paper="" or="" fee="" the="" certificate="" date="" under="" 35="" u.s.c.="" 21(a)="" (unless="" the="" certificate="" date="" is="" a="" saturday,="" sunday,="" or="" federal="" holiday="" within="" the="" district="" of="" columbia--see="" sec.="" 1.6(a))="" without="" further="" proof="" of="" the="" date="" on="" which="" the="" mailing="" by="" ``express="" mail''="" occurred="" unless="" a="" question="" is="" present="" regarding="" the="" date="" of="" mailing.="" if="" more="" than="" a="" reasonable="" time="" has="" elapsed="" between="" the="" certificate="" date="" and="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office="" receipt="" date="" or="" if="" other="" questions="" regarding="" the="" date="" of="" mailing="" are="" present,="" the="" person="" mailing="" the="" paper="" or="" fee="" may="" be="" required="" to="" file="" a="" copy="" of="" the="" ``express="" mail''="" receipt="" showing="" the="" actual="" date="" of="" mailing="" and="" a="" statement="" from="" the="" person="" who="" mailed="" the="" paper="" or="" fee="" [averring="" to="" the="" fact]="">stating< that="" the="" mailing="" occurred="" on="" the="" date="" certified.="" [such="" statement="" must="" be="" a="" verified="" statement="" if="" made="" by="" a="" person="" not="" registered="" to="" practice="" before="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office.]="" 5.="" section="" 1.14="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraphs="" (a)="" and="" (e)="" and="" by="" adding="" paragraph="" (f)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.14="" patent="" applications="" preserved="" in="" [secrecy]="">confidence<. (a)="" except="" as="" provided="" in="" sec.="" 1.11(b)="" pending="" patent="" applications="" are="" preserved="" in="" [secrecy]="">confidence<. no="" information="" will="" be="" given="" by="" the="" office="" respecting="" the="" filing="" by="" any="" particular="" person="" of="" an="" application="" for="" a="" patent,="" the="" pendency="" of="" any="" particular="" case="" before="" it,="" or="" the="" subject="" matter="" of="" any="" particular="" application,="" nor="" will="" access="" be="" given="" to="" or="" copies="" furnished="" of="" any="" pending="" application="" or="" papers="" relating="" thereto,="" without="" written="" authority="" in="" that="" particular="" application="" from="" the="" applicant="" or="" his="">or her< assignee="" or="" attorney="" or="" agent="" of="" record,="" unless="" the="" application="" has="" been="" identified="" by="" [serial]="">application< number="" in="" a="" published="" patent="" document="" or="" the="" united="" states="" of="" america="" has="" been="" indicated="" as="" a="" designated="" state="" in="" a="" published="" international="" application,="" in="" which="" case="" status="" information="">,< such="" as="" whether="" it="" is="" pending,="" abandoned,="" or="" patented="">,< may="" be="" supplied,="" or="" unless="" it="" shall="" be="" necessary="" to="" the="" proper="" conduct="" of="" business="" before="" the="" office="" or="" as="" provided="" by="" this="" part.="" where="" an="" application="" has="" been="" patented,="" the="" patent="" number="" and="" issue="" date="" may="" also="" be="" supplied.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (e)="" any="" request="" by="" a="" member="" of="" the="" public="" seeking="" access="" to,="" or="" copies="" of,="" any="" pending="" or="" abandoned="" application="" preserved="" in="" [secrecy]="">confidence< pursuant="" to="" paragraphs="" (a)="" and="" (b)="" of="" this="" section,="" or="" any="" papers="" relating="" thereto,="" must="">:< (1)="" be="" in="" the="" form="" of="" a="" petition="" and="" be="" accompanied="" by="" the="" petition="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.17(i),="" or="" (2)="" include="" written="" authority="" granting="" access="" to="" the="" member="" of="" the="" public="" in="" that="" particular="" application="" from="" the="" applicant="" or="" the="" applicant's="" assignee="" or="" attorney="" or="" agent="" of="" record.="">(f) Information as to the filing of an application will be 
    published in the Official Gazette as required by Sec. 1.47(a) and (b).< 6.="" section="" 1.17="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" removing="" and="" reserving="" paragraphs="" (b)="" through="" (d)="" and="" revising="" paragraphs="" (a)="" and="" (i)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.17="" patent="" application="" processing="" fees.="" (a)="" extension="" fee="">s pursuant to Sec. 1.136(a):< [for="" response="" within="" first="" month="" pursuant="" to="" sec.="" 1.136(a):="" by="" a="" small="" entity="" (sec.="" 1.9(f))..................................$55.00="" by="" other="" than="" a="" small="" entity...................................$110.00]="">(1) For reply within first month:
    
    By a small entity (Sec. 1.9(f))..................................$55.00
    By other than a small entity....................................$110.00
        (2) For reply within second month:
    
    By a small entity (Sec. 1.9(f)).................................$195.00
    By other than a small entity
      ..............................................................$390.00
        (3) For reply within third month:
    
    By a small entity (Sec. 1.9(f)).................................$465.00
    By other than a small entity....................................$930.00
        (4) For reply within fourth month:
    
    By a small entity (Sec. 1.9(f)).................................$735.00
    By other than a small entity..................................$1,470.00
        (5) For reply within fifth month:
    
    By a small entity (Sec. 1.9(f))...............................$1,005.00
    By other than a small entity.................................$2,010.00< (b)="">Removed< [extension="" fee="" for="" response="" within="" second="" month="" pursuant="" to="" sec.="" 1.136(a):="" by="" a="" small="" entity="" (sec.="" 1.9(f)).................................$190.00="" by="" other="" than="" a="" small="" entity...................................$380.00]="" (c)="">Removed< [extension="" fee="" for="" response="" within="" third="" month="" pursuant="" to="" sec.="" 1.136(a):="" by="" a="" small="" entity="" (sec.="" 1.9(f)).................................$450.00="" by="" other="" than="" a="" small="" entity...................................$900.00]="" (d)="">Removed< [extension="" fee="" for="" response="" within="" fourth="" month="" pursuant="" to="" sec.="" 1.136(a):="" by="" a="" small="" entity="" (sec.="" 1.9(f)).................................$700.00="" by="" other="" than="" a="" small="" entity.................................$1,400.00]="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (i)="" for="" filing="" a="" petition="" to="" the="" commissioner="" under="" a="" section="" of="" this="" part="" listed="" below="" which="" refers="" to="" this="" paragraph...........$130.00="" sec.="" 1.12--for="" access="" to="" an="" assignment="" record.="" sec.="" 1.14--for="" access="" to="" an="" application.="" sec.="" 1.53--to="" accord="" a="" filing="" date,="" except="" in="" provisional="" applications.="" sec.="" 1.55--for="" entry="" of="" late="" priority="" papers.="">Sec. 1.59--for expungement and return of information.< [sec.="" 1.60--to="" accord="" a="" filing="" date.="" sec.="" 1.62--to="" accord="" a="" filing="" date.]="" sec.="" 1.97(d)--to="" consider="" an="" information="" disclosure="" statement.="" sec.="" 1.102--to="" make="" an="" application="" special.="" sec.="" 1.103--to="" suspend="" action="" in="" application.="" sec.="" 1.177="">(a)<--for [divisional]="">multiple reissue 
    applications< [reissues="" to="" issue="" separately].="" sec.="" 1.312--for="" amendment="" after="" payment="" of="" issue="" fee.="" sec.="" 1.313--to="" withdraw="" an="" application="" from="" issue.="" sec.="" 1.314--to="" defer="" issuance="" of="" a="" patent.="" sec.="" 1.666(b)--for="" access="" to="" an="" interference="" settlement="" agreement.="" sec.="" 3.81--for="" a="" patent="" to="" issue="" to="" assignee,="" [where="" the]="" assignment="" [was]="" submitted="" after="" payment="" of="" the="" issue="" fee.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" [[page="" 49845]]="" 7.="" section="" 1.21="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (n)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.21="" miscellaneous="" fees="" and="" charges.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (n)="" for="" handling="" an="" incomplete="" or="" improper="" application="" under="" sec.="" 1.53(c)="" [,="" sec.="" 1.60="" or="" sec.="" 1.62].........................$130.00="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 8.="" section="" 1.26="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (a)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.26="" refunds.="" (a)="" [money]="">Any fee< paid="" by="" [actual]="" mistake="" or="" in="" excess="">of 
    that required< will="" be="" refunded,="" but="" a="" mere="" change="" of="" purpose="" after="" the="" payment="" of="" money,="" as="" when="" a="" party="" desires="" to="" withdraw="" an="" application,="" an="" appeal,="" or="" a="" request="" for="" oral="" hearing,="" will="" not="" entitle="" a="" party="" to="" demand="" such="" a="" return.="" amounts="" of="" twenty-five="" dollars="" or="" less="" will="" not="" be="" returned="" unless="" specifically="" requested="" within="" a="" reasonable="" time,="" nor="" will="" the="" payer="" be="" notified="" of="" such="" amounts;="" amounts="" over="" twenty-five="" may="" be="" returned="" by="" check="" or,="" if="" requested,="" by="" credit="" to="" a="" deposit="" account.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 9.="" section="" 1.27="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.27="" statement="" of="" status="" as="" small="" entity.="" (a)="" any="" person="" seeking="" to="" establish="" status="" as="" a="" small="" entity="" (sec.="" 1.9(f)="" of="" this="" part)="" for="" purposes="" of="" paying="" fees="" in="" an="" application="" or="" a="" patent="" must="" file="" a="" [verified]="" statement="" in="" the="" application="" or="" patent="" prior="" to="" or="" with="" the="" first="" fee="" paid="" as="" a="" small="" entity.="" such="" a="" [verified]="" statement="" need="" only="" be="" filed="" once="" in="" an="" application="" or="" patent="" and="" remains="" in="" effect="" until="" changed.="" (b)="">When establishing status as a small entity< [any="" verified="" statement="" filed]="" pursuant="" to="" paragraph="" (a)="" of="" this="" section="">, any 
    statement filed< on="" behalf="" of="" an="" independent="" inventor="" must="" be="" signed="" by="" the="" independent="" inventor="" except="" as="" provided="" in="" sec.="" 1.42,="" sec.="" 1.43,="" or="" sec.="" 1.47="" of="" this="" part="" and="" must="" aver="" that="" the="" inventor="" qualifies="" as="" an="" independent="" inventor="" in="" accordance="" with="" sec.="" 1.9(c)="" of="" this="" part.="" where="" there="" are="" joint="" inventors="" in="" an="" application,="" each="" inventor="" must="" file="" a="" [verified]="" statement="" establishing="" status="" as="" an="" independent="" inventor="" in="" order="" to="" qualify="" as="" a="" small="" entity.="" where="" any="" rights="" have="" been="" assigned,="" granted,="" conveyed,="" or="" licensed,="" or="" there="" is="" an="" obligation="" to="" assign,="" grant,="" convey,="" or="" license,="" any="" rights="" to="" a="" small="" business="" concern,="" a="" nonprofit="" organization,="" or="" any="" other="" individual,="" a="" [verified]="" statement="" must="" be="" filed="" by="" the="" individual,="" the="" owner="" of="" the="" small="" business="" concern,="" or="" an="" official="" of="" the="" small="" business="" concern="" or="" nonprofit="" organization="" empowered="" to="" act="" on="" behalf="" of="" the="" small="" business="" concern="" or="" nonprofit="" organization="" averring="" to="" their="" status.="" for="" purposes="" of="" a="" [verified]="" statement="" under="" this="" paragraph,="" a="" license="" to="" a="" federal="" agency="" resulting="" from="" a="" funding="" agreement="" with="" that="" agency="" pursuant="" to="" 35="" u.s.c.="" 202(c)(4)="" does="" not="" constitute="" a="" license="" as="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.9="" of="" this="" part.="" (c)="" any="" [verified]="" statement="" filed="" pursuant="" to="" paragraph="" (a)="" of="" this="" section="" on="" behalf="" of="" a="" small="" business="" concern="" must="" (1)="" be="" signed="" by="" the="" owner="" or="" an="" official="" of="" the="" small="" business="" concern="" empowered="" to="" act="" on="" behalf="" of="" the="" concern;="" (2)="" aver="" that="" the="" concern="" qualifies="" as="" a="" small="" business="" concern="" as="" defined="" in="" sec.="" 1.9(d);="" and="" (3)="" aver="" that="" the="" exclusive="" rights="" to="" the="" invention="" have="" been="" conveyed="" to="" and="" remain="" with="" the="" small="" business="" concern="" or,="" if="" the="" rights="" are="" not="" exclusive,="" that="" all="" other="" rights="" belong="" to="" small="" entities="" as="" defined="" in="" sec.="" 1.9.="" where="" the="" rights="" of="" the="" small="" business="" concern="" as="" a="" small="" entity="" are="" not="" exclusive,="" a="" [verified]="" statement="" must="" also="" be="" filed="" by="" the="" other="" small="" entities="" having="" rights="" averring="" to="" their="" status="" as="" such.="" for="" purposes="" of="" a="" [verified]="" statement="" under="" this="" paragraph,="" a="" license="" to="" a="" federal="" agency="" resulting="" from="" a="" funding="" agreement="" with="" that="" agency="" pursuant="" to="" 35="" u.s.c.="" 202(c)(4)="" does="" not="" constitute="" a="" license="" as="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.9="" of="" this="" part.="" (d)="" any="" [verified]="" statement="" filed="" pursuant="" to="" paragraph="" (a)="" of="" this="" section="" on="" behalf="" of="" a="" nonprofit="" organization="" must="" (1)="" be="" signed="" by="" an="" official="" of="" the="" nonprofit="" organization="" empowered="" to="" act="" on="" behalf="" of="" the="" organization;="" (2)="" aver="" that="" the="" organization="" qualifies="" as="" a="" nonprofit="" organization="" as="" defined="" in="" sec.="" 1.9(e)="" of="" this="" part="" specifying="" under="" which="" one="" of="" sec.="" 1.9(e)="" (1),="" (2),="" (3),="" or="" (4)="" of="" this="" part="" the="" organization="" qualifies;="" and="" (3)="" aver="" that="" exclusive="" rights="" to="" the="" invention="" have="" been="" conveyed="" to="" and="" remain="" with="" the="" organization="" or="" if="" the="" rights="" are="" not="" exclusive="" that="" all="" other="" rights="" belong="" to="" small="" entities="" as="" defined="" in="" sec.="" 1.9="" of="" this="" part.="" where="" the="" rights="" of="" the="" nonprofit="" organization="" as="" a="" small="" entity="" are="" not="" exclusive,="" a="" [verified]="" statement="" must="" also="" be="" filed="" by="" the="" other="" small="" entities="" having="" rights="" averring="" to="" their="" status="" as="" such.="" for="" purposes="" of="" a="" [verified]="" statement="" under="" this="" paragraph,="" a="" license="" to="" a="" federal="" agency="" pursuant="" to="" 35="" u.s.c.="" 202(c)(4)="" does="" not="" constitute="" a="" conveyance="" of="" rights="" as="" set="" forth="" in="" this="" paragraph.="" 10.="" section="" 1.28="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraphs="" (a)="" and="" (c)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.28="" effect="" on="" fees="" of="" failure="" to="" establish="" status,="" or="" change="" status,="" as="" a="" small="" entity.="" (a)="" the="" failure="" to="" establish="" status="" as="" a="" small="" entity="" (secs.="" 1.9(f)="" and="" 1.27="" of="" this="" part)="" in="" any="" application="" or="" patent="" prior="" to="" paying,="" or="" at="" the="" time="" of="" paying,="" any="" fee="" precludes="" payment="" of="" the="" fee="" in="" the="" amount="" established="" for="" small="" entities.="" a="" refund="" pursuant="" to="" sec.="" 1.26="" of="" this="" part,="" based="" on="" establishment="" of="" small="" entity="" status,="" of="" a="" portion="" of="" fees="" timely="" paid="" in="" full="" prior="" to="" establishing="" status="" as="" a="" small="" entity="" may="" only="" be="" obtained="" if="" a="" [verified]="" statement="" under="" sec.="" 1.27="" and="" a="" request="" for="" a="" refund="" of="" the="" excess="" amount="" are="" filed="" within="" two="" months="" of="" the="" date="" of="" the="" timely="" payment="" of="" the="" full="" fee.="" the="" two-month="" time="" period="" is="" not="" extendable="" under="" sec.="" 1.136.="" status="" as="" a="" small="" entity="" is="" waived="" for="" any="" fee="" by="" the="" failure="" to="" establish="" the="" status="" prior="" to="" paying,="" at="" the="" time="" of="" paying,="" or="" within="" two="" months="" of="" the="" date="" of="" payment="" of,="" the="" fee.="" status="" as="" a="" small="" entity="" must="" be="" specifically="" established="" in="" each="" application="" or="" patent="" in="" which="" the="" status="" is="" available="" and="" desired.="" status="" as="" a="" small="" entity="" in="" one="" application="" or="" patent="" does="" not="" affect="" any="" other="" application="" or="" patent,="" including="" applications="" or="" patents="" which="" are="" directly="" or="" indirectly="" dependent="" upon="" the="" application="" or="" patent="" in="" which="" the="" status="" has="" been="" established.="">The refiling of an application under Sec. 1.53 as a 
    continuation, division, continuation-in-part or continued prosecution 
    application or the filing of a reissue application requires a new 
    determination as to continued entitlement to small entity status for 
    the refiled application or the reissue application.< a="" nonprovisional="" application="" claiming="" benefit="" under="" 35="" u.s.c.="" 119(e),="" 120,="" 121,="" or="" 365(c)="" of="" a="" prior="" application,="">a continued prosecution application, or 
    a reissue application< may="" rely="" on="" a="" [verified]="" statement="" filed="" in="" the="" prior="" application="">or in the patent< if="" the="" nonprovisional="" application="">, the continued prosecution application or the reissue application< includes="" a="" reference="" to="" the="" [verified]="" statement="" in="" the="" prior="" application="">or in the patent< or="" includes="" a="" copy="" of="" the="" [verified]="" statement="" in="" the="" prior="" application="">or in the patent< and="" status="" as="" a="" small="" entity="" is="" still="" proper="" and="" desired.="">The payment of a small 
    entity basic statutory filing fee will substitute for the reference.< once="" status="" as="" a="" small="" entity="" has="" been="" established="" in="" an="" application="" or="" patent,="" the="" status="" remains="" in="" that="" application="" or="" patent="" without="" the="" filing="" of="" a="" further="" [verified]="" statement="" [[page="" 49846]]="" pursuant="" to="" sec.="" 1.27="" of="" this="" part="" unless="" the="" office="" is="" notified="" of="" a="" change="" in="" status.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (c)="" if="" status="" as="" a="" small="" entity="" is="" established="" in="" good="" faith,="" and="" fees="" as="" a="" small="" entity="" are="" paid="" in="" good="" faith,="" in="" any="" application="" or="" patent,="" and="" it="" is="" later="" discovered="" that="" such="" status="" as="" a="" small="" entity="" was="" established="" in="" error="" or="" that="" through="" error="" the="" office="" was="" not="" notified="" of="" a="" change="" in="" status="" as="" required="" by="" paragraph="" (b)="" of="" this="" section,="" the="" error="" will="" be="" excused="" [(1)="" if="" any="" deficiency="" between="" the="" amount="" paid="" and="" the="" amount="" due="" is="" paid="" within="" three="" months="" after="" the="" date="" the="" error="" occurred="" or="" (2)="" if="" any]="">upon payment of the< deficiency="" between="" the="" amount="" paid="" and="" the="" amount="" due="" [is="" paid="" more="" than="" three="" months="" after="" the="" date="" the="" error="" occurred="" and="" the="" payment="" is="" accompanied="" by="" a="" statement="" explaining="" how="" the="" error="" in="" good="" faith="" occurred="" and="" how="" and="" when="" the="" error="" was="" discovered.="" the="" statement="" must="" be="" a="" verified="" statement="" if="" made="" by="" a="" person="" not="" registered="" to="" practice="" before="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office].="" the="" deficiency="" is="" based="" on="" the="" amount="" of="" the="" fee,="" for="" other="" than="" a="" small="" entity,="" in="" effect="" at="" the="" time="" the="" deficiency="" is="" paid="" in="" full.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 11.="" section="" 1.33="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (a)="" to="" read="" as="" follows="" and="" to="" remove="" and="" reserve="" paragraph="" (b):="" sec.="" 1.33="" correspondence="">address< respecting="" patent="" applications,="" reexamination="" proceedings,="" and="" other="" proceedings.="" (a)="" [the="" residence="" and="" post="" office="" address="" of="" the="" applicant="" must="" appear="" in="" the="" oath="" or="" declaration="" if="" not="" stated="" elsewhere="" in="" the="" application.]="" the="" applicant="" [may="" also="" specify="" and]="">, the assignee(s) 
    of the entire interest (see Secs.  3.71 and 3.73) or< an="" attorney="" or="" agent="" of="" record="">(see Sec. 1.34(b))< may="" specify="" a="" correspondence="" address="" to="" which="" communications="" about="" the="" application="" are="" to="" be="" directed.="" all="" notices,="" official="" letters,="" and="" other="" communications="" in="" the="" [case]="">application< will="" be="" directed="" to="" the="" correspondence="" address="" or,="" if="" no="" such="" correspondence="" address="" is="" specified,="" to="" an="" attorney="" or="" agent="" of="" record="" (see="" sec.="" 1.34(b)),="" or,="" if="" no="" attorney="" or="" agent="" is="" of="" record,="" to="" the="" applicant="" [,="" or="" to="" any="" assignee="" of="" record="" of="" the="" entire="" interest="" if="" the="" applicant="" or="" such="" assignee="" so="" requests,="" or="" to="" an="" assignee="" of="" an="" undivided="" part="" if="" the="" applicant="" so="" requests,="" at="" the]="">provided a< post="" office="" address="" [of="" which="" the="" office]="" has="" been="" [notified]="">furnished< in="" the="" [case]="">application<. amendments="" and="" other="" papers="" filed="" in="" the="" application="" must="" be="" signed:="" (1)="" by="" the="" applicant,="" or="" (2)="" if="" there="" is="" an="" assignee="" of="" record="" of="" an="" undivided="" part="" interest,="" by="" the="" applicant="" and="" such="" assignee,="" or="" (3)="" if="" there="" is="" an="" assignee="" of="" record="" of="" the="" entire="" interest,="" by="" such="" assignee,="" or="" (4)="" by="" an="" attorney="" or="" agent="" of="" record,="" or="" (5)="" by="" a="" registered="" attorney="" or="" agent="" not="" of="" record="" who="" acts="" in="" a="" representative="" capacity="" under="" the="" provisions="" of="" sec.="" 1.34(a).="" double="" correspondence="" with="" an="" applicant="" and="" [his]="">an< attorney="" or="" agent,="" or="" with="" more="" than="" one="" attorney="" or="" agent,="" will="" not="" be="" undertaken.="" if="" more="" than="" one="" attorney="" or="" agent="" [be]="">is< made="" of="" record="" and="" a="" correspondence="" address="" has="" not="" been="" specified,="" correspondence="" will="" be="" held="" with="" the="" one="" last="" made="" of="" record.="" (b)="">[Reserved]< *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 12.="" section="" 1.41="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (a)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.41="" applicant="" for="" patent.="" (a)="" a="" patent="" [must="" be]="">is< applied="" for="" in="" the="" name="" of="" the="" actual="" inventor="" or="" inventors.="">The inventorship of an application is set forth 
    in the oath or declaration that is executed in accordance with 
    Sec. 1.63.< [full="" names="" must="" be="" stated,="" including="" the="" family="" name,="" and="" at="" least="" one="" given="" name="" without="" abbreviation="" together="" with="" any="" other="" given="" name="" or="" initial.]="">For identification purposes, the name of the 
    actual inventor or inventors should be supplied when the specification 
    and any required drawing are filed. If the name of the actual inventor 
    or inventors are not supplied when the specification and any required 
    drawing are filed, the application should include an applicant 
    identification consisting of alphanumeric characters.< *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 13.="" section="" 1.47="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.47="" filing="" when="" an="" inventor="" refuses="" to="" sign="" or="" cannot="" be="" reached.="" (a)="" if="" a="" joint="" inventor="" refuses="" to="" join="" in="" an="" application="" for="" patent="" or="" cannot="" be="" found="" or="" reached="" after="" diligent="" effort,="" the="" application="" may="" be="" made="" by="" the="" other="" inventor="" on="" behalf="" of="" himself="" or="" herself="" and="" the="" [omitted]="">nonsigning< inventor.="" the="" oath="" or="" declaration="" in="" such="" an="" application="" must="" be="" accompanied="" by="" a="" petition="" including="" proof="" of="" the="" pertinent="" facts="">,< [and]="" by="" the="" [required]="" fee="">set forth in< [(]sec.="" 1.17(h)[)]="">,< and="" [must="" state]="" the="" last="" known="" address="" of="" the="" [omitted="" ]="">nonsigning< inventor.="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office="" shall="" forward="" notice="" of="" the="" filing="" of="" the="" application="" to="" the="" [omitted]="">nonsigning< inventor="" at="" said="" address[.="" should="" such="" notice="" be="" returned="" to="" the="" office="" undelivered,="" or="" should="" the="" address="" of="" the="" omitted="" inventor="" be="" unknown,]="">and< notice="" of="" the="" filing="" of="" the="" application="" shall="" be="" published="" in="" the="" official="" gazette.="" the="" [omitted]="">nonsigning< inventor="" may="" subsequently="" join="" in="" the="" application="" on="" filing="" an="" oath="" or="" declaration="" [of="" the="" character="" required="" by]="">complying 
    with< sec.="" 1.63.="" [a="" patent="" may="" be="" granted="" to="" the="" inventor="" making="" the="" application,="" upon="" a="" showing="" satisfactory="" to="" the="" commissioner,="" subject="" to="" the="" same="" rights="" which="" the="" omitted="" inventor="" would="" have="" had="" if="" he="" or="" she="" had="" been="" joined.]="" (b)="" whenever="" [an]="">all the< [inventor]="">inventors< [refuses]="">refuse< to="" execute="" an="" application="" for="" patent,="" or="" cannot="" be="" found="" or="" reached="" after="" diligent="" effort,="" a="" person="" to="" whom="" [the]="">an< inventor="" has="" assigned="" or="" agreed="" in="" writing="" to="" assign="" the="" invention="" or="" who="" otherwise="" shows="" sufficient="" proprietary="" interest="" in="" the="" matter="" justifying="" such="" action="" may="" make="" application="" for="" patent="" on="" behalf="" of="" and="" as="" agent="" for="">all< the="" [inventor]="">inventors<. the="" oath="" or="" declaration="" in="" such="" an="" application="" must="" be="" accompanied="" by="" a="" petition="" including="" proof="" of="" the="" pertinent="" facts="">,< [and]="" a="" showing="" that="" such="" action="" is="" necessary="" to="" preserve="" the="" rights="" of="" the="" parties="" or="" to="" prevent="" irreparable="" damage,="" [and="" by]="" the="" [required]="" fee=""> set forth in< [(]sec.="" 1.17(h)[)]="">,< and="" [must="" state]="" the="" last="" known="" address="" of="">all< the="" [inventor]="">inventors<. [the="" assignment,="" written="" agreement="" to="" assign="" or="" other="" evidence="" of="" proprietary="" interest,="" or="" a="" verified="" copy="" thereof,="" must="" be="" filed="" in="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office.]="" the="" office="" shall="" forward="" notice="" of="" the="" filing="" of="" the="" application="" to="">all< the="" [inventor]="">inventors< at="" the="" [address]="">addresses< stated="" in="" the="" application[.="" should="" such="" notice="" be="" returned="" to="" the="" office="" undelivered,="" or="" should="" the="" address="" of="" the="" inventor="" be="" unknown]="">and< notice="" of="" the="" filing="" of="" the="" application="" shall="" be="" published="" in="" the="" official="" gazette.="" [the]="">An< inventor="" may="" subsequently="" join="" in="" the="" application="" on="" filing="" an="" oath="" or="" declaration="" [of="" the="" character="" required="" by]="">complying with< sec.="" 1.63.="" [a="" patent="" may="" be="" granted="" to="" the="" inventor="" upon="" a="" showing="" satisfactory="" to="" the="" commissioner.]="" 14.="" section="" 1.48="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.48="" correction="" of="" inventorship="">in a patent application<. (a)="" [if="" the="" correct="" inventor="" or="" inventors="" are="" not="" named="" in="" a="" nonprovisional="" application="" through="" error="" without="" any="" [[page="" 49847]]="" deceptive="" intention="" on="" the="" part="" of="" the="" actual="" inventor="" or="" inventors,]="">If the inventive entity is set forth in error in an executed Sec. 1.63 
    or Sec. 1.175 oath or declaration and such error arose without any 
    deceptive intention on the part of the person named as an inventor in 
    error or on the part of the person who through error was not named as 
    an inventor<, the="" application="" may="" be="" amended="" to="" name="" only="" the="" actual="" inventor="" or="" inventors.="">When the application is involved in an 
    interference, the amendment shall comply with the requirements of this 
    section and shall be accompanied by a motion under Sec. 1.634.< such="" amendment="" must="" be="" [diligently="" made="" and="" must="" be]="" accompanied="" by:="" (1)="" a="" petition="" including="" a="" statement="" [of="" facts="" verified="" by="" the="" original="" named="" inventor="" or="" inventors="" establishing="" when="" the="" error="" without="" deceptive="" intention="" was="" discovered="" and="" how="" it="" occurred]="">from 
    each person who is being added as an inventor and from each person who 
    is being deleted as an inventor that the error in inventorship occurred 
    without deceptive intention on their part<; (2)="" an="" oath="" or="" declaration="" by="" each="" actual="" inventor="" or="" inventors="" as="" required="" by="" sec.="" 1.63="">or as permitted by Secs. 1.42, 1.43 or 1.47<; (3)="" the="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.17(h);="" and="" (4)="">If an assignment has been executed by any of the original 
    named inventors the,< [the]="" written="" consent="" of="" [any]="">the< assignee="">, 
    see Sec. 3.73(b)<. [when="" the="" application="" is="" involved="" in="" an="" interference,="" the="" petition="" shall="" comply="" with="" the="" requirements="" of="" this="" section="" and="" shall="" be="" accompanied="" by="" a="" motion="" under="" sec.="" 1.634.]="" (b)="" if="" the="" correct="" inventors="" are="" named="" in="" [the]="">a< nonprovisional="" application="" when="" filed="" and="" the="" prosecution="" of="" the="" application="" results="" in="" the="" amendment="" or="" cancellation="" of="" claims="" so="" that="" less="" than="" all="" of="" the="" originally="" named="" inventors="" are="" the="" actual="" inventors="" of="" the="" invention="" being="" claimed="" in="" the="" application,="" an="" amendment="" shall="" be="" filed="" deleting="" the="" names="" of="" the="" person="" or="" persons="" who="" are="" not="" inventors="" of="" the="" invention="" being="" claimed.="">When the application is involved in an 
    interference, the amendment shall comply with the requirements of this 
    section and shall be accompanied by a motion under Sec. 1.634. Such< [the]="" amendment="" must="" be="" [diligently="" made="" and="" shall="" be]="" accompanied="" by:="" (1)="" a="" petition="" including="" a="" statement="" identifying="" each="" named="" inventor="" who="" is="" being="" deleted="" and="" acknowledging="" that="" the="" inventor's="" invention="" is="" no="" longer="" being="" claimed="" in="" the="" application;="" and="" (2)="" the="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.17(h).="" (c)="" if="" a="" nonprovisional="" application="" discloses="" unclaimed="" subject="" matter="" by="" an="" inventor="" or="" inventors="" not="" named="" in="" the="" application,="" the="" application="" may="" be="" amended="" [pursuant="" to="" paragraph="" (a)="" of="" this="" section]="" to="" add="" claims="" to="" the="" subject="" matter="" and="" name="" the="" correct="" inventors="" for="" the="" application.="">When the application is involved in an interference, 
    the amendment shall comply with the requirements of this section and 
    shall be accompanied by a motion under Sec. 1.634. Such amendment must 
    be accompanied by:
        (1) A petition including a statement from each person being added 
    as an inventor that the amendment is necessitated by amendment of the 
    claims and that the inventorship error occurred without deceptive 
    intention on their part;
        (2) An oath or declaration by each actual inventor or inventors as 
    required by Sec. 1.63 or as permitted by Secs. 1.42, 1.43 or 1.47;
        (3) The fee set forth in Sec. 1.17(h); and
        (4) If an assignment has been executed by any of the original named 
    inventors, the written consent of the assignee, see Sec. 3.73(b)<. (d)="" if="" the="" name="" or="" names="" of="" an="" inventor="" or="" inventors="" were="" omitted="" in="" a="" provisional="" application="" through="" error="" without="" any="" deceptive="" intention="" on="">their part< [the="" part="" of="" the="" actual="" inventor="" or="" inventors],="" the="" provisional="" application="" may="" be="" amended="" to="" add="" the="" name="" or="" names="" of="" the="" [actual]="">omitted< inventor="" or="" inventors.="" such="" amendment="" must="" be="" accompanied="" by:="" (1)="" a="" petition="" including="" a="" statement="" that="" the="">inventorship< error="" occurred="" without="" deceptive="" intention="" on="" the="" part="" of="" the="" [actual]="">omitted< inventor="" or="" inventors[,="" which="" statement="" must="" be="" a="" verified="" statement="" if="" made="" by="" a="" person="" not="" registered="" to="" practice="" before="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office];="" and="" (2)="" the="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.17(q).="" (e)="" if="" a="" person="" or="" persons="" were="" named="" as="" an="" inventor="" or="" inventors="" in="" a="" provisional="" application="" through="" error="" without="" any="" deceptive="" intention="">on their part<, an="" amendment="" may="" be="" filed="" in="" the="" provisional="" application="" deleting="" the="" name="" or="" names="" of="" the="" person="" or="" persons="" who="" were="" erroneously="" named.="" such="" amendment="" must="" be="" accompanied="" by:="" (1)="" a="" petition="" including="" a="" statement="" [of="" facts="" verified]="" by="" the="" person="" or="" persons="" whose="" name="" or="" names="" are="" being="" deleted="" [establishing]="" that="" the="">inventorship< error="" occurred="" without="" deceptive="" intention="">on 
    their part<; (2)="" the="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.17(q);="" and="" (3)="" [the="" written="" consent="" of="" any="" assignee.]="">If an assignment has 
    been executed by any of the original named inventors, the written 
    consent of the assignee, see Sec. 3.73(b).
        (f) If the correct inventor or inventors are not named on filing a 
    nonprovisional application without an executed oath or declaration 
    under Sec. 1.63, the later submission of an executed oath or 
    declaration under Sec. 1.63 will act to correct the earlier 
    identification of inventorship.
        (g) The Office may require such other information as may be deemed 
    appropriate under the particular circumstances surrounding the 
    correction of inventorship.< 15.="" section="" 1.51="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" removing="" paragraph="" (c).="" sec.="" 1.51="" general="" requisites="" of="" an="" application.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (c)="" [removed]="" 16.="" section="" 1.52="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraphs="" (a)="" and="" (d)="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.52="" language,="" paper,="" writing,="" margins.="" (a)="" the="" application,="" any="" amendments="" or="" corrections="" thereto,="" and="" the="" oath="" or="" declaration="" must="" be="" in="" the="" english="" language="" except="" as="" provided="" for="" in="" sec.="" 1.69="" and="" paragraph="" (d)="" of="" this="" section,="" or="" be="" accompanied="" by="" a="" [verified]="" translation="" of="" the="" application="" and="" a="" translation="" of="" any="" corrections="" or="" amendments="" into="" the="" english="" language="">together with a 
    statement that the translation is accurate<. all="" papers="" which="" are="" to="" become="" a="" part="" of="" the="" permanent="" records="" of="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office="" must="" be="" legibly="" written,="" typed,="" or="" printed="" in="" permanent="" ink="" or="" its="" equivalent="" in="" quality.="" all="" of="" the="" application="" papers="" must="" be="" presented="" in="" a="" form="" having="" sufficient="" clarity="" and="" contrast="" between="" the="" paper="" and="" the="" writing,="" typing,="" or="" printing="" thereon="" to="" permit="" the="" direct="" reproduction="" of="" readily="" legible="" copies="" in="" any="" number="" by="" use="" of="" photographic,="" electrostatic,="" photo-offset,="" and="" microfilming="" processes.="" if="" the="" papers="" are="" not="" of="" the="" required="" quality,="" substitute="" typewritten="" or="" printed="" papers="" of="" suitable="" quality="" may="" be="" required.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (d)="" an="" application="" may="" be="" filed="" in="" a="" language="" other="" than="" english.="" [a="" verified]="">An< english="" translation="" of="" the="" non-english-language="" application="">, a statement that the translation is accurate,< and="" the="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.17(k)="" are="" required="" to="" be="" filed="" with="" the="" application="" or="" within="" such="" time="" as="" may="" be="" set="" by="" the="" office.="" 17.="" section="" 1.53="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraphs="" (b)="" through="" (d)="" as="" follows:="" [[page="" 49848]]="" sec.="" 1.53="" application="" number,="" filing="" date,="" and="" completion="" of="" application.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (b)(1)="" the="" filing="" date="" of="" an="" application="" for="" patent="" filed="" under="" this="" section,="" except="" for="" a="" provisional="" application="">under paragraph 
    (b)(2) of this section or a continued prosecution application under 
    paragraph (b)(3) of this section<, is="" the="" date="" on="" which:="" a="" specification="" containing="" a="" description="" pursuant="" to="" sec.="" 1.71="" and="" at="" least="" one="" claim="" pursuant="" to="" sec.="" 1.75;="" and="" any="" drawing="" required="" by="" sec.="" 1.81(a),="" are="" filed="" in="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office="" [in="" the="" name="" of="" the="" actual="" inventor="" or="" inventors="" as="" required="" by="" sec.="" 1.41].="" no="" new="" matter="" may="" be="" introduced="" into="" an="" application="" after="" its="" filing="" date="">(1.115(b)(1))< [(sec.="" 1.118)].="" [if="" all="" the="" names="" of="" the="" actual="" inventor="" or="" inventors="" are="" not="" supplied="" when="" the="" specification="" and="" any="" required="" drawing="" are="" filed,="" the="" application="" will="" not="" be="" given="" a="" filing="" date="" earlier="" than="" the="" date="" upon="" which="" the="" names="" are="" supplied="" unless="" a="" petition="" with="" the="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.17(i)="" is="" filed="" which="" sets="" forth="" the="" reasons="" the="" delay="" in="" supplying="" the="" names="" should="" be="" excused.]="" a="" continuation="" or="" divisional="" application="" (filed="" under="" the="" conditions="" specified="" in="" 35="" u.s.c.="" 120,="" 121="" or="" 365(c)="" and="" sec.="" 1.78(a))="" may="" be="" filed="" under="" this="">paragraph or paragraph (b)(3) of this< section="" [,="" sec.="" 1.60="" or="" sec.="" 1.62].="" a="" continuation-in-part="" application="">must< [may="" also]="" be="" filed="" under="" this="">paragraph< [section="" or="" sec.="" 1.62].="">(i) Any continuation or divisional application may be filed by all 
    or by less than all of the inventors named in a prior application. A 
    newly executed oath or declaration is not required 
    (Sec. 1.51(a)(1)(ii)) and paragraph (d) of this section in a 
    continuation or divisional application filed by all or by less than all 
    of the inventors named in a prior application, provided that one of the 
    following is submitted: A copy of the executed oath or declaration 
    filed to complete (Sec. 1.51(a)(1)) the most immediate prior national 
    application for which priority is claimed under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121 or 
    365(c), or a copy of an unexecuted oath or declaration, and a statement 
    that the copy is a true copy of the oath or declaration that was 
    subsequently executed and filed to complete (Sec. 1.51(a)(1)) the most 
    immediate prior national application for which priority is claimed 
    under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121 or 365(c). See paragraph (d) of this section 
    for the filing of a continuation or divisional application without the 
    submission of a newly executed oath or declaration or a copy of the 
    oath or declaration for the most immediate prior national application 
    for which priority is claimed under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121 or 365(c).
        (A) The copy of the executed or unexecuted oath or declaration for 
    the most immediate prior national application for which priority is 
    claimed under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121 or 365(c) must be accompanied by a 
    statement requesting the deletion of the names of the person or persons 
    who are not inventors in the continuation or divisional application.
        (B) Where the power of attorney or correspondence address was 
    changed during the prosecution of the prior application, the change in 
    power of attorney or correspondence address must be identified in the 
    continuation or divisional application.
        (ii) A newly executed oath or declaration must be filed in a 
    continuation or divisional application naming an inventor not named in 
    the prior application. A newly executed oath or declaration must be 
    filed in a continuation-in-part application, which application may name 
    all, more, or less than all of the inventors named in the prior 
    application.
        (iii) The inventorship of an application is set forth in the oath 
    or declaration that is executed in accordance with Sec. 1.63.< (2)="" the="" filing="" date="" of="" a="" provisional="" application="" is="" the="" date="" on="" which:="" a="" specification="" as="" prescribed="" by="" 35="" u.s.c.="" 112,="" first="" paragraph;="" and="" any="" drawing="" required="" by="" sec.="" 1.81(a),="" are="" filed="" in="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office="" [in="" the="" name="" of="" the="" actual="" inventor="" or="" inventors="" as="" required="" by="" sec.="" 1.41].="" no="" amendment,="" other="" than="" to="" make="" the="" provisional="" application="" comply="" with="" all="" applicable="" regulations,="" may="" be="" made="" to="" the="" provisional="" application="" after="" the="" filing="" date="" of="" the="" provisional="" application.="" [if="" all="" the="" names="" of="" the="" actual="" inventor="" or="" inventors="" are="" not="" supplied="" when="" the="" specification="" and="" any="" required="" drawing="" are="" filed,="" the="" provisional="" application="" will="" not="" be="" given="" a="" filing="" date="" earlier="" than="" the="" date="" upon="" which="" the="" names="" are="" supplied="" unless="" a="" petition="" with="" the="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.17(q)="" is="" filed="" which="" sets="" forth="" the="" reasons="" the="" delay="" in="" supplying="" the="" names="" should="" be="" excused.]="" (i)="" a="" provisional="" application="" must="" also="" include="" a="" cover="" sheet="" identifying="" the="" application="" as="" a="" provisional="" application.="" otherwise,="" the="" application="" will="" be="" treated="" as="" an="" application="" filed="" under="">paragraph (b)(1) of this section< [sec.="" 1.53(b)(1)].="" (ii)="" an="" application="" for="" patent="" filed="" under="">paragraph (b)(1) of 
    this section< [sec.="" 1.53(b)(1)]="" may="" be="" [treated="" as]="">converted to< a="" provisional="" application="" and="" be="" accorded="" the="" original="" filing="" date="" provided="" that="" a="" petition="" requesting="" the="" conversion,="" with="" the="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.17(q),="" is="" filed="" prior="" to="" the="" earlier="" of="" the="" abandonment="" of="" the="" [sec.="" 1.53(b)(1)]="" application="">under paragraph (b)(1) of this 
    section<, the="" payment="" of="" the="" issue="" fee,="" the="" expiration="" of="" 12="" months="" after="" the="" filing="" date="" of="" the="" [sec.="" 1.53(b)(1)]="" application="">under 
    paragraph (b)(1) of this section<, or="" the="" filing="" of="" a="" request="" for="" a="" statutory="" invention="" registration="" under="" sec.="" 1.293.="" the="" grant="" of="" any="" such="" petition="" will="" not="" entitle="" applicant="" to="" a="" refund="" of="" the="" fees="" which="" were="" properly="" paid="" in="" the="" application="" filed="" under="">paragraph (b)(1) of 
    this section< [sec.="" 1.53(b)(1)].="" (iii)="" a="" provisional="" application="" shall="" not="" be="" entitled="" to="" the="" right="" of="" priority="" under="" sec.="" 1.55="" or="" 35="" u.s.c.="" 119="" or="" 365(a)="" or="" to="" the="" benefit="" of="" an="" earlier="" filing="" date="" under="" sec.="" 1.78="" or="" 35="" u.s.c.="" 120,="" 121="" or="" 365(c)="" of="" any="" other="" application.="" no="" claim="" for="" priority="" under="" sec.="" 1.78(a)(3)="" may="" be="" made="" in="" a="" design="" application="" based="" on="" a="" provisional="" application.="" no="" request="" under="" sec.="" 1.293="" for="" a="" statutory="" invention="" registration="" may="" be="" filed="" in="" a="" provisional="" application.="" the="" requirements="" of="" secs.="" 1.821="" through="" 1.825="" regarding="" application="" disclosures="" containing="" nucleotide="" and/or="" amino="" acid="" sequences="" are="" not="" mandatory="" for="" provisional="" applications.="">(3) In a nonprovisional application that is complete as defined by 
    Sec. 1.51(a)(1) and filed on or after June 8, 1995, a continuation or 
    divisional application that discloses and claims only subject matter 
    disclosed in and names as inventors the same or less than all the 
    inventors named in that prior complete application may be filed as a 
    continued prosecution application under this paragraph. The filing date 
    of a continued prosecution application is the date on which a request 
    for an application under this paragraph including identification of the 
    prior application number is filed.
        (i) An application filed under this paragraph:
        (A) Will utilize the file jacket and contents of the prior 
    application, including the specification, drawings and oath or 
    declaration, from the prior complete application (Sec. 1.51(a)) to 
    constitute the new application, and will be assigned the application 
    number of the prior application for identification purposes,
        (B) Is a request to expressly abandon the prior application as of 
    the filing date of the request for an application under this paragraph, 
    and
        (C) Must be filed before the payment of the issue fee, abandonment 
    of, or termination of proceedings on the prior application, or after 
    payment of the
    
    [[Page 49849]]
    
    issue fee if a petition under Sec. 1.313(b)(5) is granted in the prior 
    application.
        (ii) The filing fee for a continued prosecution application filed 
    under this paragraph is:
        (A) The basic filing fee as set forth in Sec. 1.16(a), and
        (B) Any additional Sec. 1.16 fee due based on the number of claims 
    remaining in the application after entry of any amendment accompanying 
    the request for an application under this paragraph and entry of any 
    amendments under Sec. 1.116 unentered in the prior application which 
    applicant has requested to be entered in the continued prosecution 
    application.
        (iii) If an application filed under this paragraph is filed by less 
    than all the inventors named in the prior application, a statement must 
    accompany the application when filed requesting deletion of the names 
    of the person or persons who are not inventors of the invention being 
    claimed in the new application.
        (iv) Any new change must be made in the form of an amendment to the 
    prior application. Any new specification filed with the request for an 
    application under this paragraph will not be considered part of the 
    original application papers, but will be treated as a substitute 
    specification in accordance with Sec. 1.125.
        (v) The filing of a continued prosecution application under this 
    paragraph will be construed to include a waiver of confidence by the 
    applicant under 35 U.S.C. 122 to the extent that any member of the 
    public who is entitled under the provisions of Sec. 1.14 to access to, 
    or information concerning either the prior application or any 
    application filed under the provisions of this paragraph may be given 
    similar access to, or similar information concerning, the other 
    application(s) in the file jacket.
        (vi) In addition to identifying the application number of the prior 
    application, applicant is urged to furnish in the request for an 
    application under this paragraph the following information relating to 
    the prior application to the best of his or her ability:
        (A) Title of invention;
        (B) Name of applicant(s);
        (C) Correspondence address;
        (D) Identification of any priority claim under 35 U.S.C. 119, 120 
    and 121.
        (vii) Envelopes containing only requests and fees for filing an 
    application under this paragraph should be marked ``Box CPA.''< (c)="">(1) If any application filed under paragraph (b) of this 
    section is found to be incomplete or improper, applicant will be so 
    notified and given a time period within which to correct the filing 
    error.
        (2) Any request for review of a notification pursuant to paragraph 
    (c)(1) of this section, or a notification that the original application 
    papers lack a portion of the specification or drawing(s), must be by 
    way of a petition pursuant to this paragraph. Any petition under this 
    paragraph must be accompanied by the fee set forth in Sec. 1.17(i) in 
    an application filed under paragraphs (b)(1) or (b)(3) of this section, 
    and the fee set forth in Sec. 1.17(q) in an application filed under 
    paragraph (b)(2) of this section. In the absence of a timely 
    (Sec. 1.181(f)) petition pursuant to this paragraph, the filing date of 
    an application in which the applicant was notified of a filing error 
    pursuant to paragraph (c)(1) of this section will be the date the 
    filing error is corrected.
        (3) If an applicant is notified of a filing error pursuant to 
    paragraph (c)(1) of this section, but fails to correct the filing error 
    within the given time period or otherwise timely (Sec. 1.181(f)) take 
    action pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of this section, proceedings in the 
    application will be considered terminated. Where proceedings in an 
    application are terminated pursuant to this paragraph, the application 
    may be returned or otherwise disposed of, and any filing fees, less the 
    handling fee set forth in Sec. 1.21(n), will be refunded.< [if="" any="" application="" is="" filed="" without="" the="" specification,="" drawing="" or="" name,="" or="" names,="" of="" the="" actual="" inventor="" or="" inventors="" required="" by="" paragraph="" (b)(1)="" or="" (b)(2)="" of="" this="" section,="" applicant="" will="" be="" so="" notified="" and="" given="" a="" time="" period="" within="" which="" to="" submit="" the="" omitted="" specification,="" drawing,="" name,="" or="" names,="" of="" the="" actual="" inventor,="" or="" inventors,="" in="" order="" to="" obtain="" a="" filing="" date="" as="" of="" the="" date="" of="" filing="" of="" such="" submission.="" a="" copy="" of="" the="" ``notice="" of="" incomplete="" application''="" form="" notifying="" the="" applicant="" should="" accompany="" any="" response="" thereto="" submitted="" to="" the="" office.="" if="" the="" omission="" is="" not="" corrected="" within="" the="" time="" period="" set,="" the="" application="" will="" be="" returned="" or="" otherwise="" disposed="" of;="" the="" fee,="" if="" submitted,="" will="" be="" refunded="" less="" the="" handling="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.21(n).="" any="" request="" for="" review="" of="" a="" refusal="" to="" accord="" an="" application="" a="" filing="" date="" must="" be="" by="" way="" of="" a="" petition="" accompanied="" by="" the="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.17(i),="" if="" the="" application="" was="" filed="" under="" sec.="" 1.53(b)(1),="" or="" by="" the="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.17(q),="" if="" the="" application="" was="" filed="" under="" sec.="" 1.53(b)(2).]="" (d)(1)="" if="" an="" application="" which="" has="" been="" accorded="" a="" filing="" date="" pursuant="" to="" [paragraph]="">paragraphs< (b)(1)="">or (b)(3)< of="" this="" section="">, including a continuation, divisional, or continuation-in-part 
    application,< does="" not="" include="" the="" appropriate="" filing="" fee="" or="" an="" oath="" or="" declaration="" by="" the="" applicant="" [,]="">pursuant to Secs. 1.63 or 1.175, 
    which may be a copy of the executed oath or declaration filed to 
    complete, pursuant to Sec. 1.51(a)(1), the most immediate prior 
    national application for which priority is claimed under 35 U.S.C. 120, 
    121 or 365(c), or a copy of an unexecuted oath or declaration, and a 
    statement that the copy is a true copy of the oath or declaration that 
    was subsequently executed and filed to complete (Sec. 1.51(a)(1)) the 
    most immediate prior national application for which priority is claimed 
    under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121 or 365(c), in a continuation or divisional 
    application,< applicant="" will="" be="" so="" notified,="" if="" a="" correspondence="" address="" has="" been="" provided,="" given="" a="" period="" of="" time="" within="" which="" to="" file="" the="" fee,="" oath="" [,]="" or="" declaration="" and="" to="" pay="" the="" surcharge="" as="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.16(e)="" in="" order="" to="" prevent="" abandonment="" of="" the="" application.="" [a="" copy="" of="" the="" ``notice="" to="" file="" missing="" parts''="" form="" mailed="" to="" applicant="" should="" accompany="" any="" response="" thereto="" submitted="" to="" the="" office.]="" if="" the="" required="" filing="" fee="" is="" not="" timely="" paid,="" or="" if="" the="" processing="" and="" retention="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.21(l)="" is="" not="" paid="" within="" one="" year="" of="" the="" date="" of="" mailing="" of="" the="" notification="" required="" by="" this="" paragraph,="" the="" application="" will="" be="" disposed="" of.="" no="" copies="" will="" be="" provided="" or="" certified="" by="" the="" office="" of="" an="" application="" which="" has="" been="" disposed="" of="" or="" in="" which="" neither="" the="" required="" basic="" filing="" fee="" nor="" the="" processing="" and="" retention="" fee="" has="" been="" paid.="" the="" notification="" pursuant="" to="" this="" paragraph="" may="" be="" made="" simultaneously="" with="" any="" notification="" pursuant="" to="" paragraph="" (c)="" of="" this="" section.="" if="" no="" correspondence="" address="" is="" included="" in="" the="" application,="" applicant="" has="" two="" months="" from="" the="" filing="" date="" to="" file="" the="" basic="" filing="" fee,="" oath="" or="" declaration="" and="" to="" pay="" the="" surcharge="" as="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.16(e)="" in="" order="" to="" prevent="" abandonment="" of="" the="" application;="" or,="" if="" no="" basic="" filing="" fee="" has="" been="" paid,="" one="" year="" from="" the="" filing="" date="" to="" pay="" the="" processing="" and="" retention="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.21(l)="" to="" prevent="" disposal="" of="" the="" application.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 18.="" section="" 1.54="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (b)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.54="" parts="" of="" application="" to="" be="" filed="" together;="" filing="" receipt.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (b)="" applicant="" will="" be="" informed="" of="" the="" application="" number="" and="" filing="" date="" by="" a="" filing="" receipt="">, unless the application is an application 
    filed under Sec. 1.53(b)(3)<. [[page="" 49850]]="" 19.="" section="" 1.55="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" revising="" paragraph="" (a)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.55="" claim="" for="" foreign="" priority.="" (a)="" an="" applicant="" in="" a="" nonprovisional="" application="" may="" claim="" the="" benefit="" of="" the="" filing="" date="" of="" one="" or="" more="" prior="" foreign="" applications="" under="" the="" conditions="" specified="" in="" 35="" u.s.c.="" 119="" (a)="" through="" (d)="" and="" 172.="" the="" claim="" to="" priority="" need="" be="" in="" no="" special="" form="" and="" may="" be="" made="" by="" the="" attorney="" or="" agent="" if="" the="" foreign="" application="" is="" referred="" to="" in="" the="" oath="" or="" declaration="" as="" required="" by="" sec.="" 1.63.="" the="" claim="" for="" priority="" and="" the="" certified="" copy="" of="" the="" foreign="" application="" specified="" in="" 35="" u.s.c.="" 119(b)="" must="" be="" filed="" in="" the="" case="" of="" an="" interference="" (sec.="" 1.630),="" when="" necessary="" to="" overcome="" the="" date="" of="" a="" reference="" relied="" upon="" by="" the="" examiner,="" when="" specifically="" required="" by="" the="" examiner,="" and="" in="" all="" other="" cases,="" before="" the="" patent="" is="" granted.="" if="" the="" certified="" copy="" is="" not="" in="" the="" english="" language,="" a="" translation="" need="" not="" be="" filed="" except="" in="" the="" case="" of="" interference;="" or="" when="" necessary="" to="" overcome="" the="" date="" of="" a="" reference="" relied="" upon="" by="" the="" examiner;="" or="" specifically="" required="" by="" the="" examiner,="" in="" which="" event="" an="" english="" language="" translation="" must="" be="" filed="" together="" with="" a="" statement="" that="" the="" translation="" of="" the="" certified="" copy="" is="" accurate.="" [the="" statement="" must="" be="" a="" verified="" statement="" if="" made="" by="" a="" person="" not="" registered="" to="" practice="" before="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office.]="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 20.="" section="" 1.59="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.59="">Expungement of information or copy of papers in application 
    file< [papers="" of="" application="" with="" filing="" date="" not="" to="" be="" returned].="">(a)(1) Information< [papers]="" in="" an="" application="" which="" has="" received="" a="" filing="" date="" pursuant="" to="" sec.="" 1.53="" will="" not="" be="">expunged and< returned="" [for="" any="" purpose="" whatever]="">, except as provided in paragraph (b) of 
    this section<. [if="" applicants="" have="" not="" preserved="" copies="" of="" the="" papers,="" the="" office="" will="" furnish="" copies="" at="" the="" usual="" cost="" of="" any="" application="" in="" which="" either="" the="" required="" basic="" filing="" fee="" (sec.="" 1.16)="" or,="" if="" the="" application="" was="" filed="" under="" sec.="" 1.53(b)(1),="" the="" processing="" and="" retention="" fee="" sec.="" 1.21(l)="" has="" been="" paid.]="" see="" sec.="" 1.618="" for="" return="" of="" unauthorized="" and="" improper="" papers="" in="" interferences.="">(2) Information forming part of the original disclosure, i.e., 
    written specification, drawings, claims and any preliminary amendment 
    specifically incorporated into an executed oath or declaration under 
    Secs. 1.63 and 1.175, will not be expunged from the application file.
        (b) Information, other than what is excluded by paragraph (a)(2) of 
    this section, may be requested to be expunged and returned to applicant 
    upon petition under this paragraph and payment of the petition fee set 
    forth in Sec. 1.17(i). Any petition to expunge and return information 
    from an application must establish to the satisfaction of the 
    Commissioner that the return of the information is appropriate.
        (c) If applicants have not preserved copies of any application 
    papers, the Office will furnish copies upon request, at the usual cost, 
    for any application in which either the required basic filing fee 
    (Sec. 1.16) or, if the application was filed under Sec. 1.53(b)(1), the 
    processing and retention fee (Sec. 1.21(l)) has been paid.< sec.="" 1.60="" [removed="" and="" reserved]="" 21.="" section="" 1.60="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed="" and="" reserved.="" sec.="" 1.62="" [removed="" and="" reserved]="" 22.="" section="" 1.62="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed="" and="" reserved.="" 23.="" section="" 1.63="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (a)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.63="" oath="" or="" declaration.="" (a)="" an="" oath="" or="" declaration="" filed="" under="" sec.="" 1.51(a)(1)(ii)="" as="" a="" part="" of="" an="" application="" must:="" (1)="" be="" executed="" in="" accordance="" with="" either="" sec.="" 1.66="" or="" sec.="" 1.68;="" (2)="" identify="" the="" specification="" to="" which="" it="" is="" directed;="" (3)="" identify="" each="" inventor="">by: full name, including the family 
    name, and at least one given name without abbreviation together with 
    any other given name or initial,< and="" the="" residence="">, post office 
    address< and="" country="" of="" citizenship="" of="" each="" inventor;="" and="" (4)="" state="" whether="" the="" inventor="" is="" a="" sole="" or="" joint="" inventor="" of="" the="" invention="" claimed.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 24.="" section="" 1.69="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (b)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.69="" foreign="" language="" oaths="" and="" declarations.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (b)="" unless="" the="" text="" of="" any="" oath="" or="" declaration="" in="" a="" language="" other="" than="" english="" is="" a="" form="" provided="" or="" approved="" by="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office,="" it="" must="" be="" accompanied="" by="" [a="" verified]="">an< english="" translation="">together with a statement that the translation is accurate<, except="" that="" in="" the="" case="" of="" an="" oath="" or="" declaration="" filed="" under="" sec.="" 1.63="" the="" translation="" may="" be="" filed="" in="" the="" office="" no="" later="" than="" two="" months="" from="" the="" date="" applicant="" is="" notified="" to="" file="" the="" translation.="" 25.="" section="" 1.78="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (a)(1)="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.78="" claiming="" benefit="" of="" [an]="" earlier="" filing="" date="" and="" cross-="" references="" to="" other="" applications.="" (a)(1)="" a="" nonprovisional="" application="" may="" claim="" an="" invention="" disclosed="" in="" one="" or="" more="" prior="" filed="" copending="" nonprovisional="" applications="" or="" international="" applications="" designating="" the="" united="" states="" of="" america.="" in="" order="" for="" a="" nonprovisional="" application="" to="" claim="" the="" benefit="" of="" a="" prior="" filed="" copending="" nonprovisional="" application="" or="" international="" application="" designating="" the="" united="" states="" of="" america,="" each="" prior="" application="" must="" name="" as="" an="" inventor="" at="" least="" one="" inventor="" named="" in="" the="" later="" filed="" nonprovisional="" application="" and="" disclose="" the="" named="" inventor's="" invention="" claimed="" in="" at="" least="" one="" claim="" of="" the="" later="" filed="" nonprovisional="" application="" in="" the="" manner="" provided="" by="" the="" first="" paragraph="" of="" 35="" u.s.c.="" 112.="" in="" addition,="" each="" prior="" application="" must="" be:="" (i)="" complete="" as="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.51(a)(1);="" or="" (ii)="" entitled="" to="" a="" filing="" date="" as="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="">Sec. < 1.53(b)(1)="">or (b)(3)< [,="" sec.="" 1.60="" or="" sec.="" 1.62]="" and="" include="" the="" basic="" filing="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.16;="" or="" (iii)="" entitled="" to="" a="" filing="" date="" as="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.53(b)(1)="" and="" have="" paid="" therein="" the="" processing="" and="" retention="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.21(l)="" within="" the="" time="" period="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.53(d)(1).="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 26.="" section="" 1.84="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (b)="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.84="" standards="" for="" drawings.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (b)="" photographs.="" (1)="" black="" and="" white.="" photographs="" are="" not="" ordinarily="" permitted="" in="" utility="" [and="" design]="" applications.="" however,="" the="" office="" will="" accept="" photographs="" in="" utility="" [and="" design]="" applications="" only="" after="">the< granting="" of="" a="" petition="" filed="" under="" this="" paragraph="" which="" requests="" that="" photographs="" be="" accepted.="" any="" such="" petition="" must="" include="" the="" following:="" (i)="" the="" appropriate="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.17(h);="" and="" (ii)="" three="" (3)="" sets="" of="" photographs.="" photographs="" must="" either="" be="" developed="" on="" double="" weight="" photographic="" paper="" or="" be="" permanently="" mounted="" on="" bristol="" board.="" the="" photographs="" must="" be="" of="" sufficient="" quality="" so="" that="" all="" details="" in="" the="" drawings="" are="" reproducible="" in="" the="" printed="" patent.="" [[page="" 49851]]="" (2)="" color.="" color="" photographs="" will="" be="" accepted="" in="" utility="" patent="" applications="" if="" the="" conditions="" for="" accepting="" color="" drawings="" have="" been="" satisfied.="" see="" paragraph="" (a)(2)="" of="" this="" section.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 27.="" section="" 1.91="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.91="" models="">and exhibits< not="" generally="" required="" as="" part="" of="" application="" or="" patent.="" models="">and exhibits< [were="" once="" required="" in="" all="" cases="" admitting="" a="" model,="" as="" a="" part="" of="" the="" application,="" and="" these="" models="" became="" a="" part="" of="" the="" record="" of="" the="" patent.="" such="" models="" are="" no="" longer="" generally="" required="" (the="" description="" of="" the="" invention="" in="" the="" specification,="" and="" the="" drawings,="" must="" be="" sufficiently="" full="" and="" complete,="" and="" capable="" of="" being="" understood,="" to="" disclose="" the="" invention="" without="" the="" aid="" of="" a="" model),="" and]="" will="" not="" be="" admitted="" unless="" specifically="" [called="" for.]="">required by the 
    Office. A model, working model, or other physical exhibit may be 
    required if deemed necessary for any purpose in examination of the 
    application.< sec.="" 1.92="" [removed="" and="" reserved]="" 28.="" section="" 1.92="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed="" and="" reserved.="" 29.="" section="" 1.97="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraphs="" (c)="" through="" (e)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.97="" filing="" of="" information="" disclosure="" statement.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (c)="" an="" information="" disclosure="" statement="" shall="" be="" considered="" by="" the="" office="" if="" filed="" after="" the="" period="" specified="" in="" paragraph="" (b)="" of="" this="" section,="" but="" before="" the="" mailing="" date="" of="" either:="" (1)="" a="" final="" action="" under="" sec.="" 1.113="">;< or="" (2)="" a="" notice="" of="" allowance="" under="" sec.="" 1.311,="" whichever="" occurs="" first,="" provided="" the="">information disclosure< statement="" is="" accompanied="" by="" either="" a="" [certification]="">statement< as="" specified="" in="" paragraph="" (e)="" of="" this="" section="" or="" the="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.17(p).="" (d)="" an="" information="" disclosure="" statement="" shall="" be="" considered="" by="" the="" office="" if="" filed="" after="" the="" mailing="" date="" of="" either:="">(1) A< [a]="" final="" action="" under="" sec.="" 1.113="">;< or="">(2) A< [a]="" notice="" of="" allowance="" under="" sec.="" 1.311,="" whichever="" occurs="" first,="" but="" before="" payment="" of="" the="" issue="" fee,="" provided="" the="">information 
    disclosure< statement="" is="" accompanied="" by:="" [(1)="">(i)< a="" [certification]="">statement< as="" specified="" in="" paragraph="" (e)="" of="" this="" section,="" [2]="">(ii)< a="" petition="" requesting="" consideration="" of="" the="" information="" disclosure="" statement,="" and="" [3]="">(iii)< the="" petition="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.17(i)(1).="" (e)="" a="" [certification]="">statement< under="" this="" section="" must="" state="" either:="" (1)="" that="" each="" item="" of="" information="" contained="" in="" the="" information="" disclosure="" statement="" was="" cited="" in="" a="" communication="" from="" a="" foreign="" patent="" office="" in="" a="" counterpart="" foreign="" application="" not="" more="" than="" three="" months="" prior="" to="" the="" filing="" of="" the="">information disclosure< statement="" [,]="">;< or="" (2)="" that="" no="" item="" of="" information="" contained="" in="" the="" information="" disclosure="" statement="" was="" cited="" in="" a="" communication="" from="" a="" foreign="" patent="" office="" in="" a="" counterpart="" foreign="" application="" [or]="">and<, to="" the="" knowledge="" of="" the="" person="" signing="" the="" [certification]="">statement< after="" making="" reasonable="" inquiry,="" was="" known="" to="" any="" individual="" designated="" in="" sec.="" 1.56(c)="" more="" than="" three="" months="" prior="" to="" the="" filing="" of="" the="">information disclosure< statement.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" sec.="" 1.101="" [removed="" and="" reserved]="" 30.="" section="" 1.101="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed="" and="" reserved.="" 31.="" section="" 1.102="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (a)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.102="" advancement="" of="" examination.="" (a)="" applications="" will="" not="" be="" advanced="" out="" of="" turn="" for="" examination="" or="" for="" further="" action="" except="" as="" provided="" by="" this="" part,="" or="" upon="" order="" of="" the="" commissioner="" to="" expedite="" the="" business="" of="" the="" office,="" or="" upon="" filing="" of="" a="" request="" under="" paragraph="" (b)="" of="" this="" section="" or="" upon="" filing="" a="" petition="" under="" paragraphs="" (c)="" or="" (d)="" of="" this="" section="" with="" a="" [verified]="" showing="" which,="" in="" the="" opinion="" of="" the="" commissioner,="" will="" justify="" so="" advancing="" it.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 32.="" section="" 1.103="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (a)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.103="" suspension="" of="" action.="" (a)="" suspension="" of="" action="" by="" the="" office="" will="" be="" granted="" for="" good="" and="" sufficient="" cause="" and="" for="" a="" reasonable="" time="" specified="" upon="" petition="" by="" the="" applicant="" and,="" if="" such="" cause="" is="" not="" the="" fault="" of="" the="" office,="" the="" payment="" of="" the="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.17(i)(1).="" action="" will="" not="" be="" suspended="" when="" a="">reply< [response]="" by="" the="" applicant="" to="" an="" office="" action="" is="" required.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" sec.="" 1.104="" [removed="" and="" reserved].="" 33.="" section="" 1.104="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed="" and="" reserved.="" sec.="" 1.105="" [removed="" and="" reserved].="" 34.="" section="" 1.105="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed="" and="" reserved.="" sec.="" 1.108="" [removed="" and="" reserved].="" 35.="" section="" 1.108="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed="" and="" reserved.="" 36.="" section="" 1.111="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (b)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.111="" reply="" by="" applicant="" or="" patent="" owner.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (b)="" in="" order="" to="" be="" entitled="" to="" reconsideration="" or="" further="" examination,="" the="" applicant="" or="" patent="" owner="" must="" [make="" request="" therefor="" in="" writing]="">reply<. the="" reply="" by="" the="" applicant="" or="" patent="" owner="" must="">be reduced to a writing which< distinctly="" and="" specifically="" [point]="">points< out="" the="" supposed="" errors="" in="" the="" examiner's="" action="" and="" must="" [respond]="">reply< to="" every="" ground="" of="" objection="" and="" rejection="" in="" the="" prior="" office="" action.="">The reply must present arguments pointing out the 
    specific distinctions believed to render the claims, including any 
    newly presented claims, patentable over the applied references.< if="" the="" reply="" is="" with="" respect="" to="" an="" application,="" a="" request="" may="" be="" made="" that="" objections="" or="" requirements="" as="" to="" form="" not="" necessary="" to="" further="" consideration="" of="" the="" claims="" be="" held="" in="" abeyance="" until="" allowable="" subject="" matter="" is="" indicated.="" the="" applicant's="" or="" patent="" owner's="" reply="" must="" appear="" throughout="" to="" be="" a="" bona="" fide="" attempt="" to="" advance="" the="" case="" to="" final="" action.="" a="" general="" allegation="" that="" the="" claims="" define="" a="" patentable="" invention="" without="" specifically="" pointing="" out="" how="" the="" language="" of="" the="" claims="" patentably="" distinguishes="" them="" from="" the="" references="" does="" not="" comply="" with="" the="" requirements="" of="" this="" section.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 37.="" section="" 1.112="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.112="" reconsideration="">before final action<. after="" [response]="">reply< by="" applicant="" or="" patent="" owner="" (sec.="" 1.111)="">to a non-final action<, the="" application="" or="" patent="" under="" reexamination="" will="" be="" reconsidered="" and="" again="" examined.="" the="" applicant="" or="" patent="" owner="" will="" be="" notified="" if="" claims="" are="" rejected,="" or="" objections="" or="" requirements="" made,="" in="" the="" same="" manner="" as="" after="" the="" first="" examination.="" applicant="" or="" patent="" owner="" may="" [respond]="">reply< to="" such="" office="" action="" in="" the="" same="" manner="" provided="" in="" sec.="" 1.111,="" with="" or="" without="" amendment.="" [any="" amendments="" after="" the="" second="" office="" action="" must="" ordinarily="" be="" restricted="" to="" the="" rejection="" or="" to="" the="" objections="" or="" requirements="" made.="" the="" application="" or="" patent="" under="" [[page="" 49852]]="" reexamination="" will="" be="" again="" considered,="" and="" so="" on="" repeatedly,="" unless="" the="" examiner="" has="" indicated="" that="" the="" action="" is="" final.]="" 38.="" section="" 1.113="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.113="" final="" rejection="" or="" action.="" (a)="" on="" the="" second="" or="" any="" subsequent="" examination="" or="" consideration="">by the examiner< the="" rejection="" or="" other="" action="" may="" be="" made="" final,="" whereupon="" applicant's="" or="" patent="" owner's="">reply< [response]="" is="" limited="" to="" appeal="" in="" the="" case="" of="" rejection="" of="" any="" claim="" (sec.="" 1.191),="" or="" to="" amendment="" as="" specified="" in="" sec.="" 1.116.="" petition="" may="" be="" taken="" to="" the="" commissioner="" in="" the="" case="" of="" objections="" or="" requirements="" not="" involved="" in="" the="" rejection="" of="" any="" claim="" (sec.="" 1.181).="">Reply< [response]="" to="" a="" final="" rejection="" or="" action="" must="" include="" cancellation="" of,="" or="" appeal="" from="" the="" rejection="" of,="" each="" rejected="" claim.="" if="" any="" claim="" stands="" allowed,="" the="">reply< [response]="" to="" a="" final="" rejection="" or="" action="" must="" comply="" with="" any="" requirements="" or="" objections="">as< to="" form.="" (b)="" in="" making="" such="" final="" rejection,="" the="" examiner="" shall="" repeat="" or="" state="" all="" grounds="" of="" rejection="" then="" considered="" applicable="" to="" the="" claims="" in="" the="" case,="" clearly="" stating="" the="" reasons="">in support thereof< [therefor].="">(c) The first action in an application will not be made final.< 39.="" section="" 1.115="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.115="" amendment.="" [the="" applicant="" may="" amend="" before="" or="" after="" the="" first="" examination="" and="" action="" and="" also="" after="" the="" second="" or="" subsequent="" examination="" or="" reconsideration="" as="" specified="" in="" 1.112="" or="" when="" and="" as="" specifically="" required="" by="" the="" examiner.="" the="" patent="" owner="" may="" amend="" in="" accordance="" with="" 1.510(e)="" and="" 1.530(b)="" prior="" to="" reexamination="" and="" during="" reexamination="" proceedings="" in="" accordance="" with="" 1.112="" and="" 1.116.]="">(a) The applicant or the patent owner may amend the disclosure 
    (e.g., specification, claims, drawings and abstract) of an application 
    before final action as indicated in Sec. 1.121, except for 
    nonprovisional applications which are subject to Sec. 1.53(b)(2). The 
    patent owner may amend the patent in a reexamination proceeding in 
    accordance with Sec. Sec. 1.510(e) and 1.530(d).
        (b)(1) No amendment shall introduce new matter into the disclosure 
    of an application.
        (2) If it is determined that an amendment filed after the filing 
    date of the application introduces new matter into the disclosure, the 
    claims containing the new matter will be rejected and deletion of the 
    new matter in the description and drawings will be required.
        (c) Claims may be amended by canceling particular claims, by 
    presenting new claims, or by rewriting particular claims as indicated 
    in Sec. 1.121(b). If an amendment is in reply to an Office action note 
    Sec. 1.111.
        (d) The disclosure must be amended when required to correct 
    inaccuracies of description and definition, and to secure 
    correspondence between the claims, the specification, and the drawing.
        (e) No amendment to the drawing may be made except with permission 
    of the Office. Permissible changes in the construction shown in any 
    drawing may be made only by the submission of a substitute drawing by 
    applicant. A sketch in permanent ink showing proposed changes in red, 
    to become part of the record, must be filed for approval by the 
    examiner and should be in a separate paper.
        (f) To amend a clause that was previously amended, the clause 
    should be wholly rewritten so that no interlineations or deletions 
    shall appear in the clause as finally presented. Matter canceled by 
    amendment can be reinstated only by a subsequent amendment presenting 
    the canceled matter as a new insertion.< 40.="" section="" 1.116="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraphs="" (a)="" and="" (b)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.116="" amendments="" after="" final="" action.="" (a)="" after="">a< final="" rejection="" or="">other final< action="" (sec.="" 1.113)="">,< amendments="">are limited to< [may="" be="" made]="" cancelling="" claims="" or="" complying="" with="" any="" requirement="" of="" form="">expressly set forth in a 
    previous Office action.< [which="" has="" been="" made.="" amendments="" presenting="" rejected="" claims="" in="" better="" form="" for="" consideration="" on="" appeal="" may="" be="" admitted.]="" the="" admission="" of,="" or="" refusal="" to="" admit,="" any="" amendment="" after="" final="" rejection,="" and="" any="">related< proceedings="" [relative="" thereto],="" shall="" not="" operate="" to="" relieve="" the="" application="" or="" patent="" under="" reexamination="" from="" its="" condition="" as="" subject="" to="" appeal="" or="" to="" save="" the="" application="" from="" abandonment="" under="" sec.="" 1.135.="" (b)="">Any amendment not in compliance with paragraph (a) of this 
    section must be submitted with a request for an application under 
    Sec. 1.53(b)(3) to ensure its consideration.< [if="" amendments="" touching="" the="" merits="" of="" the="" application="" or="" patent="" under="" reexamination="" are="" presented="" after="" final="" rejection,="" or="" after="" appeal="" has="" been="" taken,="" or="" when="" such="" amendment="" might="" not="" otherwise="" be="" proper,="" they="" may="" be="" admitted="" upon="" a="" showing="" of="" good="" and="" sufficient="" reasons="" why="" they="" are="" necessary="" and="" were="" not="" earlier="" presented.]="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" sec.="" 1.117="" [removed="" and="" reserved]="" 41.="" section="" 1.117="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed="" and="" reserved="" sec.="" 1.118="" [removed="" and="" reserved]="" 42.="" section="" 1.118="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed="" and="" reserved="" sec.="" 1.119="" [removed="" and="" reserved]="" 43.="" section="" 1.119="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed="" and="" reserved="" 44.="" section="" 1.121="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.121="" manner="" of="" making="" amendments.="" [(a)="" erasures,="" additions,="" insertions,="" or="" alterations="" of="" the="" office="" file="" of="" papers="" and="" records="" must="" not="" be="" physically="" entered="" by="" the="" applicant.="" amendments="" to="" the="" application="" (excluding="" the="" claims)="" are="" made="" by="" filing="" a="" paper="" (which="" should="" conform="" to="" sec.="" 1.52)="" directing="" or="" requesting="" that="" specified="" amendments="" be="" made.="" the="" exact="" word="" or="" words="" to="" be="" stricken="" out="" or="" inserted="" by="" said="" amendment="" must="" be="" specified="" and="" the="" precise="" point="" indicated="" where="" the="" deletion="" or="" insertion="" is="" to="" be="" made.="" (b)="" except="" as="" otherwise="" provided="" herein,="" a="" particular="" claim="" may="" be="" amended="" only="" by="" directions="" to="" cancel="" or="" by="" rewriting="" such="" claim="" with="" underlining="" below="" the="" word="" or="" words="" added="" and="" brackets="" around="" the="" word="" or="" words="" deleted.="" the="" rewriting="" of="" a="" claim="" in="" this="" form="" will="" be="" construed="" as="" directing="" the="" cancellation="" of="" the="" original="" claim;="" however,="" the="" original="" claim="" number="" followed="" by="" the="" parenthetical="" word="" must="" be="" used="" for="" the="" rewritten="" claim.="" if="" a="" previously="" rewritten="" claim="" is="" rewritten,="" underlining="" and="" bracketing="" will="" be="" applied="" in="" reference="" to="" the="" previously="" rewritten="" claim="" with="" the="" parenthetical="" expression="" ``twice="" amended,''="" ``three="" times="" amended,''="" etc.,="" following="" the="" original="" claim="" number.="" (c)="" a="" particular="" claim="" may="" be="" amended="" in="" the="" manner="" indicated="" for="" the="" application="" in="" paragraph="" (a)="" of="" this="" section="" to="" the="" extent="" of="" corrections="" in="" spelling,="" punctuation,="" and="" typographical="" errors.="" additional="" amendments="" in="" this="" manner="" will="" be="" admitted="" provided="" the="" changes="" are="" limited="" to="" (1)="" deletions="" and/or="" (2)="" the="" addition="" of="" no="" more="" than="" five="" words="" in="" any="" one="" claim.="" any="" amendment="" submitted="" with="" instructions="" to="" amend="" particular="" claims="" but="" failing="" to="" conform="" to="" the="" provisions="" of="" paragraphs="" (b)="" and="" (c)="" of="" this="" section="" may="" be="" considered="" nonresponsive="" and="" treated="" accordingly.="" (d)="" where="" underlining="" or="" brackets="" are="" intended="" to="" appear="" in="" the="" printed="" patent="" [[page="" 49853]]="" or="" are="" properly="" part="" of="" the="" claimed="" material="" and="" not="" intended="" as="" symbolic="" of="" changes="" in="" the="" particular="" claim,="" amendment="" by="" rewriting="" in="" accordance="" with="" paragraph="" (b)="" of="" this="" section="" shall="" be="" prohibited.="" (e)="" in="" reissue="" applications,="" both="" the="" descriptive="" portion="" and="" the="" claims="" are="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" either="" (1)="" submitting="" a="" copy="" of="" a="" portion="" of="" the="" description="" or="" an="" entire="" claim="" with="" all="" matter="" to="" be="" deleted="" from="" the="" patent="" being="" placed="" between="" brackets="" and="" all="" matter="" to="" be="" added="" to="" the="" patent="" being="" underlined,="" or="" (2)="" indicating="" the="" exact="" word="" or="" words="" to="" be="" stricken="" out="" or="" inserted="" and="" the="" precise="" point="" where="" the="" deletion="" or="" insertion="" is="" to="" be="" made.="" any="" word="" or="" words="" to="" be="" inserted="" must="" be="" underlined.="" see="" 1.173.="" (f)="" proposed="" amendments="" presented="" in="" patents="" involved="" in="" reexamination="" proceedings="" must="" be="" presented="" in="" the="" form="" of="" a="" full="" copy="" of="" the="" text="" of:="" (1)="" each="" claim="" which="" is="" amended="" and="" (2)="" each="" paragraph="" of="" the="" description="" which="" is="" amended.="" matter="" deleted="" from="" the="" patent="" shall="" be="" placed="" between="" brackets="" and="" matter="" added="" shall="" be="" underlined.="" copies="" of="" the="" printed="" claims="" from="" the="" patent="" may="" be="" used="" with="" any="" additions="" being="" indicated="" by="" carets="" and="" deleted="" material="" being="" placed="" between="" brackets.="" claims="" must="" not="" be="" renumbered="" and="" the="" numbering="" of="" the="" claims="" added="" for="" reexamination="" must="" follow="" the="" number="" of="" the="" highest="" numbered="" patent="" claim.="" no="" amendment="" may="" enlarge="" the="" scope="" of="" the="" claims="" of="" the="" patent.="" no="" new="" matter="" may="" be="" introduced="" into="" the="" patent.]="">(a) Amendments in non-reissue applications: Amendments in 
    applications excluding reissue applications are made by filing a paper, 
    in compliance with Sec. 1.52, directing that specified amendments be 
    made.
        (1) Specification other than claims: Amendments to the 
    specification other than claims may only be made as follows:
        (i) The precise point in the specification must be indicated where 
    an amendment is to be made.
        (ii) If the only changes to the specification are deletions, 
    amendments may only be made by precise directions to delete.
        (iii) Except as provided by paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section, 
    amendments must be made by submission of a copy of the rewritten 
    sentence(s), paragraph(s) and/or page(s) with marking pursuant to 
    paragraph (a)(1)(iv) of this section.
        (iv) Underlining below the subject matter added and brackets around 
    the subject matter deleted are to be used to mark the amendments being 
    made. If a previously rewritten sentence(s), paragraph(s) or page(s) is 
    again rewritten, marking will be applied in reference to the 
    sentence(s), paragraph(s) or page(s) as previously rewritten.
        (2) Claims: Amendments to the claims may only be made as follows:
        (i)(A) A claim may be cancelled by a direction to cancel the claim 
    or by omitting the claim when submitting a complete copy of all pending 
    claims as required by (a)(2)(ii) of this section.
        (B) A previously submitted claim may only be amended, other than by 
    cancellation pursuant to paragraph (a)(2)(i)(A) of this section, by 
    submitting a copy of the claim completely rewritten with markings, 
    pursuant to paragraph (a)(2)(iii) of this section, of the subject 
    matter added and/or deleted. The rewriting of a claim in this form will 
    be construed as directing that the rewritten claim be a replacement for 
    the previously submitted claim; however, the previously submitted claim 
    number followed by the parenthetical word ``amended'' must be used for 
    the rewritten claim.
        (C) A new claim may only be added by submitting a clean copy of the 
    new claim. The numbering of any new claims added must follow the number 
    of the highest numbered previously submitted claim.
        (ii) Whenever a previously submitted claim is amended by rewriting 
    pursuant to paragraph (a)(2)(i)(B) of this section or a new claim is 
    added pursuant to paragraph (a)(2)(i)(C) of this section, applicant 
    must submit a separate complete copy of all pending claims. Such 
    separate complete copy must include all newly rewritten, all newly 
    added, all previously rewritten claims that are still pending, and any 
    unamended claims that are still pending. For all claims, other than 
    those claims being newly rewritten, the copy must be submitted in clean 
    form without markings as to previous amendments.
        (iii) Underlining below the subject matter added and brackets 
    around the subject matter deleted relative to the previously submitted 
    claim are to be used to mark the amendments being made. If a previously 
    rewritten claim is again rewritten, marking will be applied in 
    reference to the claim as previously rewritten, and the parenthetical 
    expression will be ``twice amended,'' ``three times amended,'' etc., 
    following the original claim number.
        (iv) The failure to include a copy of any previously submitted 
    claim with the separate complete copy of all pending claims required by 
    paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section will be construed as a direction 
    to cancel that claim.
        (3) Drawings: Amendments to the original application drawings are 
    not permitted. Any change to the application drawings must be by way of 
    a substitute sheet of drawings for each sheet changed submitted in 
    compliance with Sec. 1.84.
        (4) Any amendment to an application that is present in a substitute 
    specification submitted pursuant to Sec. 1.125 must be presented under 
    the provisions of Sec. 1.121(a)(1) either prior to or concurrent with 
    submission of the substitute specification.
        (b) Amendments in reissue applications: Amendments in reissue 
    applications are made by filing a paper, in compliance with Sec. 1.52, 
    directing that specified amendments be made.
        (1) Specification other than claims: Amendments to the 
    specification other than claims may only be made as follows:
        (i) The precise point in the specification must be indicated where 
    an amendment is to be made.
        (ii) Amendments must be made by submission of the entire text of 
    the rewritten paragraph(s) with markings pursuant to paragraph 
    (b)(1)(iv) of this section.
        (iii) Each submission of an amendment to the specification must 
    include all amendments to the specification relative to the patent as 
    of the date of the submission. This would include amendments to the 
    specification of the patent submitted for the first time as well as any 
    previously submitted amendments that are still desired. Any previously 
    submitted amendments to the specification that are no longer desired 
    must not be included in the submission.
        (iv) Underlining below the subject matter added to the patent and 
    brackets around the subject matter deleted from the patent are to be 
    used to mark the amendments being made.
        (2) Claims: Amendments to the claims are made as follows:
        (i)(A) The amendment must include the entire text of each patent 
    claim which is amended and of each added claim with marking pursuant to 
    paragraph (b)(2)(i)(C), of this section except a patent claim should be 
    cancelled by a statement cancelling the patent claim without 
    presentation of the text of the patent claim.
        (B) Patent claims must not be renumbered and the numbering of any 
    claims added to the patent must follow the number of the highest 
    numbered patent claim.
        (C) Underlining below the subject matter added to the patent and 
    brackets around the subject matter deleted from the patent are to be 
    used to mark the
    
    [[Page 49854]]
    
    amendments being made. If a claim is amended pursuant to paragraph 
    (b)(2)(i)(A) of this section, a parenthetical expression ``amended,'' 
    ``twice amended,'' etc., should follow the original claim number.
        (ii) Each amendment submission must set forth the status, as of the 
    date of the amendment, of all patent claims and of all added claims.
        (iii) Each amendment when originally submitted must be accompanied 
    by an explanation of the support in the disclosure of the patent for 
    the amendment along with any additional comments on page(s) separate 
    from the page(s) containing the amendment.
        (iv) Each submission of an amendment to any claim (patent claims 
    and all added claims) must include all pending amendments to the claims 
    as of the date of the submission. This would include amendments to the 
    claims submitted for the first time as well as any previously submitted 
    amendments to the claims that are still desired. Any previously 
    submitted amendments to the claims that are no longer desired must not 
    be included in the submission. A copy of any patent claims that have 
    not been amended are not to be presented with each amendment 
    submission.
        (v) The failure to submit a copy of any added claim, as required by 
    paragraph (b)(2)(iv) of this section, will be construed as a direction 
    to cancel that claim.
        (vi) No reissue patent shall be granted enlarging the scope of the 
    claims of the original patent unless applied for within two years from 
    the grant of the original patent, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 251. No 
    amendment to the patent claims may introduce new matter or be made in 
    an expired patent.
        (3) Drawings: Amendments to the original patent drawings are not 
    permitted. Any change to the patent drawings must be by way of a new 
    sheet of drawings with the amended figures identified as ``amended'' 
    and with added figures identified as ``new'' for each sheet changed 
    submitted in compliance with Sec. 1.84.
        (c) Amendments in reexamination proceedings: Any proposed amendment 
    to the description and claims in patents involved in reexamination 
    proceedings must be made in accordance with Sec. 1.530.< sec.="" 1.122="" [removed="" and="" reserved]="" 45.="" section="" 1.122="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed="" and="" reserved.="" sec.="" 1.123="" [removed="" and="" reserved]="" 46.="" section="" 1.123="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed="" and="" reserved.="" sec.="" 1.124="" [removed="" and="" reserved]="" 47.="" section="" 1.124="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed="" and="" reserved.="" sec.="" 1.125="" substitute="" specification.="" 48.="" section="" 1.125="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" as="" follows:="">(a)< if="" the="" number="" or="" nature="" of="" the="" amendments=""> or the legibility 
    of the specification< [shall]="" render="" it="" difficult="" to="" [consider="" the="" case,="" or="" to="" arrange="" the="" papers="" for="" printing="" or="" copying]="">process an 
    application<, the="" office="" may="" require="" the="" entire="" specification,="" including="" the="" claims,="" or="" any="" part="" thereof,="" to="" be="" rewritten="" in="" clean="" form="" incorporating="" all="" amendments.="">(b)< a="" substitute="" specification="" for="" an="" application="" other="" than="" a="" reissue="" application="" may="" [not="" be="" accepted="" unless="" it="" has="" been="" required="" by="" the="" examiner="" or="" unless="" it="" is="" clear="" to="" the="" examiner="" that="" acceptance="" of="" a="" substitute="" specification="" would="" facilitate="" processing="" of="" the="" application.="" any="" substitute="" specification]="">be< filed="" [must="" be]="">at any 
    point up to payment of the issue fee if it is< accompanied="" by="" a="" statement="" that="" the="" substitute="" specification="">:
        (1)< includes="" no="" new="" matter="">, and
        (2) includes only amendments submitted in accordance with the 
    requirements of Sec. 1.121(a) either prior to or concurrent with 
    submission of the substitute specification<. [such="" statement="" must="" be="" a="" verified="" statement="" if="" made="" by="" a="" person="" not="" registered="" to="" practice="" before="" the="" office.].="">(c) A substitute specification submitted under this section must 
    be submitted in clean form without markings as to amended material.
        (d) A substitute specification under this section is not permitted 
    in reissue applications or in reexamination proceedings.< 49.="" section="" 1.133="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (b)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.133="" interviews.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (b)="" in="" every="" instance="" where="" reconsideration="" is="" requested="" in="" view="" of="" an="" interview="" with="" an="" examiner,="" a="" complete="" written="" statement="" of="" the="" reasons="" presented="" at="" the="" interview="" as="" warranting="" favorable="" action="" must="" be="" filed="" by="" the="" applicant.="" an="" interview="" does="" not="" remove="" the="" necessity="" for="">reply< [response]="" to="" office="" actions="" as="" specified="" in="" sec.="" 1.111,="" sec.="" 1.135.="" 50.="" the="" undesignated="" center="" heading="" in="" subpart="" b-national="" processing="" provisions,="" following="" sec.="" 1.133="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" time="" for="">Reply< [response]="" by="" applicant;="" abandonment="" of="" application="" 51.="" section="" 1.134="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.134="" time="" period="" for="">reply< [response]="" to="" an="" office="" action.="" an="" office="" action="" will="" notify="" the="" applicant="" of="" any="" non-statutory="" or="" shortened="" statutory="" time="" period="" set="" for="">reply< [response]="" to="" an="" office="" action.="" unless="" the="" applicant="" is="" notified="" in="" writing="" that="" [response]="">a 
    reply< is="" required="" in="" less="" than="" six="" months,="" a="" maximum="" period="" of="" six="" months="" is="" allowed.="" 52.="" section="" 1.135="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.135="" abandonment="" for="" failure="" to="">reply< [respond]="" within="" time="" period.="" (a)="" if="" an="" applicant="" of="" a="" patent="" application="" fails="" to="">reply< [respond]="" within="" the="" time="" period="" provided="" under="" sec.="" 1.134="" and="" sec.="" 1.136,="" the="" application="" will="" become="" abandoned="" unless="" an="" office="" action="" indicates="" otherwise.="" (b)="" prosecution="" of="" an="" application="" to="" save="" it="" from="" abandonment="" pursuant="" to="" paragraph="" (a)="" of="" this="" section="" must="" include="" such="" complete="" and="" proper="" action="" as="" the="" condition="" of="" the="" case="" may="" require.="" the="" admission="" of="">, or refusal to admit, any amendment after final 
    rejection, and any related proceedings,< an="" amendment="" not="" responsive="" to="" the="" last="" office="" action,="" or="" refusal="" to="" admit="" the="" same,="" and="" any="" proceedings="" relative="" thereto,="" shall="" not="" operate="" to="" save="" the="" application="" from="" abandonment.="" (c)="" when="" action="" by="" the="" applicant="" is="" a="" bona="" fide="" attempt="" to="">reply< [respond]="" and="" to="" advance="" the="" case="" to="" final="" action,="" and="" is="" substantially="" a="" complete="" [response]="">reply< to="" the="">non-final< office="" action,="" but="" consideration="" of="" some="" matter="" or="" compliance="" with="" some="" requirement="" has="" been="" inadvertently="" omitted,="">applicant< [opportunity="" to="" explain="" and="" supply="" the="" omission]="" may="" be="" given="">a new time period for reply under 
    Sec. 1.134 to supply the omission or to file a continuing application< [before="" the="" question="" of="" abandonment="" is="" considered].="" 53.="" section="" 1.136="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" the="" heading="" and="" paragraph="" (a)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.136="" filing="" of="" timely="">replies< [responses]="" with="" petition="" and="" fee="" for="" extension="" of="" time="" and="" extensions="" of="" time="" for="" cause.="" (a)(1)="" if="" an="" applicant="" is="" required="" to="">reply< [respond]="" within="" a="" nonstatutory="" or="" shortened="" statutory="" time="" period,="" applicant="" may="">reply< [respond]="" up="" to="" [four]="">five< months="" after="" the="" time="" [[page="" 49855]]="" period="" set="">and within the statutory period, if applicable,< if="" a="" petition="" for="" an="" extension="" of="" time="" and="" the="" fee="" set="" in="" sec.="" 1.17="">(a)< are="" filed="" [prior="" to="" or="" with="" the="" response],="" unless:="" (i)="" applicant="" is="" notified="" otherwise="" in="" an="" office="" action,="" (ii)="" the="">reply< [response]="" is="" a="" reply="" brief="" submitted="" pursuant="" to="" sec.="" 1.193(b),="" (iii)="" the="">reply< [response]="" is="" a="" request="" for="" an="" oral="" hearing="" submitted="" pursuant="" to="" sec.="" 1.194(b),="" (iv)="" the="">reply< [response]="" is="" to="" a="" decision="" by="" the="" board="" of="" patent="" appeals="" and="" interferences="" pursuant="" to="" sec.="" 1.196,="" sec.="" 1.197="" or="" sec.="" 1.304,="" or="" (v)="" the="" application="" is="" involved="" in="" an="" interference="" declared="" pursuant="" to="" sec.="" 1.611.="" (2)="" the="" date="" on="" which="" the="" [response,="" the]="" petition="" [,]="" and="" the="" fee="" have="" been="" filed="" is="" the="" date="" [of="" the="" response="" and="" also="" the="" date]="" for="" purposes="" of="" determining="" the="" period="" of="" extension="" and="" the="" corresponding="" amount="" of="" the="" fee.="" the="" expiration="" of="" the="" time="" period="" is="" determined="" by="" the="" amount="" of="" the="" fee="" paid.="">A reply must be filed prior to the 
    expiration of the period of extension to avoid abandonment of the 
    application (Sec. 1.135), but in< [in]="" no="" case="" may="" an="" applicant="">reply< [respond]="" later="" than="" the="" maximum="" time="" period="" set="" by="" statute,="" or="" be="" granted="" an="" extension="" of="" time="" under="" paragraph="" (b)="" of="" this="" section="" when="" the="" provisions="" of="" this="" paragraph="" are="" available.="" see="" sec.="" 1.136(b)="" for="" extensions="" of="" time="" relating="" to="" proceedings="" pursuant="" to="" secs.="" 1.193(b),="" 1.194,="" 1.196="" or="" 1.197.="" see="" sec.="" 1.304="" for="" extension="" of="" time="" to="" appeal="" to="" the="" u.s.="" court="" of="" appeals="" for="" the="" federal="" circuit="" or="" to="" commence="" a="" civil="" action.="" see="" sec.="" 1.550(c)="" for="" extension="" of="" time="" in="" reexamination="" proceedings="" and="" sec.="" 1.645="" for="" extension="" of="" time="" in="" interference="" proceedings.="">(3) A paper may be submitted in an application with an 
    authorization to treat any concurrent or future reply requiring a 
    petition for an extension of time under paragraph (a) of this section 
    for its timely submission as incorporating such petition for the 
    appropriate length of time. An authorization to charge all required 
    fees, fees under Sec. 1.17, or all required extension of time fees will 
    be treated as a constructive petition for an extension of time in any 
    concurrent or future reply requiring a petition for an extension of 
    time under paragraph (a) of this section for its timely submission.< *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 54.="" section="" 1.137="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.137="" revival="" of="" abandoned="" application="">or lapsed patent<. (a)="" an="">abandoned< application="" [abandoned="" for="" failure="" to="" prosecute]="" may="" be="" revived="" as="" a="" pending="" application="">or a lapsed patent may be 
    revived as a patent< if="" it="" is="" shown="" to="" the="" satisfaction="" of="" the="" commissioner="" that="" the="" delay="">in prosecution or payment of any portion 
    of the required issue fee< was="" unavoidable.="" a="" petition="" to="" revive="" an="">unavoidably< abandoned="" application="">or unavoidably lapsed patent< must="" be="" [promptly="" filed="" after="" the="" applicant="" is="" notified="" of,="" or="" otherwise="" becomes="" aware="" of,="" the="" abandonment,="" and="" must="" be]="" accompanied="" by:="" [(1)="" a="" proposed="" response="" to="" continue="" prosecution="" of="" that="" application,="" or="" the="" filing="" of="" a="" continuing="" application,="" unless="" either="" has="" been="" previously="" filed;]="">(1) The required reply, unless previously filed. In a 
    nonprovisional application abandoned for failure to prosecute, the 
    proposed reply requirement may be met by the filing of a continuing 
    application. In an abandoned application or a lapsed patent, for 
    failure to pay any portion of the required issue fee, the proposed 
    reply must be the issue fee or any outstanding balance thereof;< (2)="" the="" petition="" fee="" as="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.17(l);="" [and]="" (3)="" a="" showing="" that="" the="" delay="" was="" unavoidable="">and that the petition 
    was promptly filed after the applicant was notified of, or otherwise 
    became aware of, the abandonment or lapse; and< [the="" showing="" must="" be="" a="" verified="" showing="" if="" made="" by="" a="" person="" not="" registered="" to="" practice="" before="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office.]="">(4) Any terminal disclaimer (and fee as set forth in Sec. 1.20(d)) 
    required pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section.< (b)="" an="">abandoned< application="" [unintentionally="" abandoned="" for="" failure="" to="" prosecute]="" may="" be="" revived="" as="" a="" pending="" application="">or 
    lapsed patent may be revived as a patent< if="" the="" delay="">in prosecution 
    or payment of any portion of the required issue fee< was="" unintentional.="" a="" petition="" to="" revive="" an="" unintentionally="" abandoned="" application="">or 
    lapsed patent< must="" be="">accompanied by<:>(1) The required reply, unless previously filed. In a 
    nonprovisional application abandoned for failure to prosecute, the 
    proposed reply requirement may be met by the filing of a continuing 
    application. In an abandoned application or a lapsed patent, for 
    failure to pay any portion of the required issue fee, the proposed 
    reply must be the issue fee or any outstanding balance thereof;< [(1)="" accompanied="" by="" a="" proposed="" response="" to="" continue="" prosecution="" of="" that="" application,="" or="" filing="" of="" a="" continuing="" application,="" unless="" either="" has="" been="" previously="" filed;]="" (2)="" [accompanied="" by="" the]="" the="" petition="" fee="" as="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.17(m);="" (3)="" [accompanied="" by="" a]="" a="" statement="" that="" the="" delay="" was="" unintentional.="" [the="" statement="" must="" be="" a="" verified="" statement="" if="" made="" by="" a="" person="" not="" registered="" to="" practice="" before="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office.]="" the="" commissioner="" may="" require="" additional="" information="" where="" there="" is="" a="" question="" whether="" the="" delay="" was="" unintentional;="" and="" (4)="">Any terminal disclaimer (and fee as set forth in Sec. 1.20(d)) 
    required pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section.< [filed="" either:="" (i)="" within="" one="" year="" of="" the="" date="" on="" which="" the="" application="" became="" abandoned;="" or="" (ii)="" within="" three="" months="" of="" the="" date="" of="" the="" first="" decision="" on="" a="" petition="" to="" revive="" under="" paragraph="" (a)="" of="" this="" section="" which="" was="" filed="" within="" one="" year="" of="" the="" date="" on="" which="" the="" application="" became="" abandoned.]="" (c)="">In all design applications and in all nonprovisional utility 
    or plant applications filed before June 8, 1995< [in="" all="" applications="" filed="" before="" june="" 8,="" 1995,="" and="" all="" design="" applications="" filed="" on="" or="" after="" june="" 8,="" 1995],="" any="" petition="" pursuant="" to="" [paragraph="" (a)="" of]="" this="" section="" [not="" filed="" within="" six="" months="" of="" the="" date="" of="" abandonment="" of="" the="" application,]="" must="" be="" accompanied="" by="" a="" terminal="" disclaimer="" with="" fee="" under="" sec.="" 1.321="" dedicating="" to="" the="" public="" a="" terminal="" part="" of="" the="" term="" of="" any="" patent="" granted="" thereon="" equivalent="" to="" the="" period="" of="" abandonment="" of="" the="" application.="" the="" terminal="" disclaimer="" must="" also="" apply="" to="" any="" patent="" granted="" on="" any="" continuing="" application="" entitled="" under="" 35="" u.s.c.="" 120="" to="" the="" benefit="" of="" the="" filing="" date="" of="" the="" application="" for="" which="" revival="" is="" sought.="" (d)="" any="" request="" for="" reconsideration="" or="" review="" of="" a="" decision="" refusing="" to="" revive="" an="">abandoned< application="">or lapsed patent< upon="" petition="" filed="" pursuant="" to="" paragraphs="" (a)="" or="" (b)="" of="" this="" section,="" to="" be="" considered="" timely,="" must="" be="" filed="" within="" two="" months="" of="" the="" decision="" refusing="" to="" revive="" or="" within="" such="" time="" as="" set="" in="" the="" decision.="" (e)="" the="" time="" periods="" set="" forth="" in="" this="" section="" [cannot="" be="" extended,="" except="" that="" the="" three-month="" period="" set="" forth="" in="" paragraph="" (b)(4)(ii)="" and="" the="" time="" period="" set="" forth="" in="" paragraph="" (d)="" of="" this="" section]="" may="" be="" extended="" under="" the="" provisions="" of="" sec.="" 1.136.="">(f) A provisional application, abandoned for failure to timely 
    reply to an Office requirement, may be revived pursuant to paragraphs 
    (a) or (b) this
    
    [[Page 49856]]
    
    section so as to be pending for a period of no longer than twelve 
    months from its filing date. Under no circumstances will a provisional 
    application be regarded as pending after twelve months from its filing 
    date.< sec.="" 1.139="" [removed="" and="" reserved]="" 55.="" section="" 1.139="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed="" and="" reserved.="" 56.="" section="" 1.142="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (a)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.142="" requirement="" for="" restriction.="" (a)="" if="" two="" or="" more="" independent="" and="" distinct="" inventions="" are="" claimed="" in="" a="" single="" application,="" the="" examiner="" in="" [his]="">an Office< action="" shall="" require="" the="" applicant="" in="" [his]="">a reply< [response]="" to="" that="" action="" to="" elect="" [that]="">an< invention="" to="" which="" [his]="">the< [claim]="">claims< shall="" be="" restricted,="" this="" official="" action="" being="" called="" a="" requirement="" for="" restriction="" (also="" known="" as="" a="" requirement="" for="" division).="" [if="" the="" distinctness="" and="" independence="" of="" the="" inventions="" be="" clear,="" such]="">Such< requirement="" will="">normally< be="" made="" before="" any="" action="" on="" the="" merits;="" however,="" it="" may="" be="" made="" at="" any="" time="" before="" final="" action="" [in="" the="" case="" at="" the="" discretion="" of="" the="" examiner].="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 57.="" section="" 1.144="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.144="" petition="" from="" requirement="" for="" restriction.="" after="" a="" final="" requirement="" for="" restriction,="" the="" applicant,="" in="" addition="" to="" making="" any="">reply< [response]="" due="" on="" the="" remainder="" of="" the="" action,="" may="" petition="" the="" commissioner="" to="" review="" the="" requirement.="" petition="" may="" be="" deferred="" until="" after="" final="" action="" on="" or="" allowance="" of="" claims="" to="" the="" invention="" elected,="" but="" must="" be="" filed="" not="" later="" than="" appeal.="" a="" petition="" will="" not="" be="" considered="" if="" reconsideration="" of="" the="" requirement="" was="" not="" requested.="" 58.="" section="" 1.146="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.146="" election="" of="" species.="" in="" the="" first="" action="" on="" an="" application="" containing="" a="" [generic]="" claim="">to a generic invention (genus)< and="" claims="" [restricted="" separately="" to="" each="" of]="">to< more="" than="" one="">patentably distinct< species="" embraced="" thereby,="" the="" examiner="" may="" require="" the="" applicant="" in="" his="">or her reply< [response]="" to="" that="" action="" to="" elect="" [that]="">a< species="" of="" his="" or="" her="" invention="" to="" which="" his="" or="" her="" claim="" shall="" be="" restricted="" if="" no="" [generic]="" claim="">to the genus< is="" [held]="">found to be< allowable.="" however,="" if="" such="" application="" contains="" claims="" directed="" to="" more="" than="" a="" reasonable="" number="" of="" species,="" the="" examiner="" may="" require="" restriction="" of="" the="" claims="" to="" not="" more="" than="" a="" reasonable="" number="" of="" species="" before="" taking="" further="" action="" in="" the="" case.="" 59.="" section="" 1.152="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.152="" design="" drawings.="" the="" design="" must="" be="" represented="" by="" a="" drawing="" that="" complies="" with="" the="" requirements="" of="" sec.="" 1.84,="" and="" must="" contain="" a="" sufficient="" number="" of="" views="" to="" constitute="" a="" complete="" disclosure="" of="" the="" appearance="" of="" the="" [article]="">design<. appropriate="">and adequate< surface="" shading="" [must]="">should< be="" used="" to="" show="" the="" character="" or="" contour="" of="" the="" surfaces="" represented.="" solid="" black="" surface="" shading="" is="" not="" permitted="" except="" when="" used="" to="" represent="">the color black as well as< color="" contrast.="" broken="" lines="" may="" be="" used="" to="" show="" visible="" environmental="" structure,="" but="" may="" not="" be="" used="" to="" show="" hidden="" planes="" and="" surfaces="" which="" cannot="" be="" seen="" through="" opaque="" materials.="" alternate="" positions="" of="" a="" design="" component,="" illustrated="" by="" full="" and="" broken="" lines="" in="" the="" same="" view="" are="" not="" permitted="" in="" a="" design="" drawing.="">Color photographs and color drawings will be 
    permitted in design applications only after the granting of a petition 
    filed under Sec. 1.84(a)(2).< photographs="" and="" ink="" drawings="" must="" not="" be="" combined="">as formal drawings< in="" one="" application.="" photographs="" submitted="" in="" lieu="" of="" ink="" drawings="" in="" design="" patent="" applications="" must="" comply="" with="" sec.="" 1.84(b)="" and="" must="" not="" disclose="" environmental="" structure="" but="" must="" be="" limited="" to="" the="" design="" for="" the="" article="" claimed.="" [color="" drawings="" and="" color="" photographs="" are="" not="" permitted="" in="" design="" patent="" applications.]="" 60.="" section="" 1.154="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (a)="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.154="" arrangement="" of="" specification.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (a)="" preamble,="" stating="" name="" of="" the="" applicant="">,< [and]="" title="" of="" the="" designn="">, and a brief description of the nature and intended use of the 
    article in which the design is embodied<. *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 61.="" section="" 1.155="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" removing="" paragraphs="" (b)="" through="" (f).="" sec.="" 1.155="" issue="" and="" term="" of="" design="" patents.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (b)="" [removed].="" (c)="" [removed].="" (d)="" [removed].="" (e)="" [removed].="" (f)="" [removed].="" 62.="" section="" 1.163="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (b)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.163="" specification.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (b)="" two="" copies="" of="" the="" specification="" (including="" the="" claim)="" must="" be="" submitted,="" but="" only="" one="" signed="" oath="" or="" declaration="" is="" required.="" [the="" second="" copy="" of="" the="" specification="" may="" be="" a="" legible="" carbon="" copy="" of="" the="" original.]="" 63.="" section="" 1.165="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (a)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.165="" plant="" drawings.="" (a)="" plant="" patent="" drawings="" [should="" be="" artistically="" and="" competently="" executed="" and]="" must="" comply="" with="" the="" requirements="" of="" sec.="" 1.84.="" view="" numbers="" and="" reference="" characters="" need="" not="" be="" employed="" unless="" required="" by="" the="" examiner.="" the="" drawing="" must="" disclose="" all="" the="" distinctive="" characteristics="" of="" the="" plant="" capable="" of="" visual="" representation.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 64.="" section="" 1.167(b)="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed="" and="" reserved.="" sec.="" 1.167="" examination.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (b)="" [reserved].="" 65.="" section="" 1.171="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.171="" application="" for="" reissue.="" an="" application="" for="" reissue="" must="" contain="" the="" same="" parts="" required="" for="" an="" application="" for="" an="" original="" patent,="" complying="" with="" all="" the="" rules="" relating="" thereto="" except="" as="" otherwise="" provided,="" and="" in="" addition,="" must="" comply="" with="" the="" requirements="" of="" the="" rules="" relating="" to="" reissue="" applications.="" [the="" application="" must="" be="" accompanied="" by="" a="" certified="" copy="" of="" an="" abstract="" of="" title="" or="" an="" order="" for="" a="" title="" report="" accompanied="" by="" the="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.19(b)(4),="" to="" be="" placed="" in="" the="" file,="" and="" by="" an="" offer="" to="" surrender="" the="" original="" patent="" (sec.="" 1.178).]="" 66.="" section="" 1.172="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (a)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.172="" applicants,="" assignees.="" (a)="" a="" reissue="" oath="" must="" be="" signed="" and="" sworn="" to="" or="" declaration="" made="" by="" the="" inventor="" or="" inventors="" except="" as="" otherwise="" provided="" (see="" secs.="" 1.42,="" 1.43,="" 1.47),="" and="" must="" be="" accompanied="" by="" the="" written="" [assent]="">consent< of="" all="" assignees,="" if="" any,="" owning="" an="" undivided="" interest="" in="" the="" patent,="" but="" a="" reissue="" oath="" may="" be="" made="" and="" sworn="" to="" or="" declaration="" made="" by="" the="" assignee="" of="" the="" entire="" interest="" if="" the="" application="" does="" not="" seek="" to="" enlarge="" the="" scope="" of="" the="" claims="" of="" the="" original="" patent.="">All assignees consenting to the reissue must 
    establish their ownership interest in the patent to the satisfaction of 
    the Commissioner. Ownership is
    
    [[Page 49857]]
    
    established by submitting to the Office documentary evidence of a chain 
    of title from the original owner to the assignee or by specifying 
    (e.g., reel and frame number, etc.) where such evidence is recorded in 
    the Office. Documents submitted to establish ownership may be required 
    to be recorded.< *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 67.="" section="" 1.175="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.175="" reissue="" oath="" or="" declaration.="" (a)="" [applicants="" for="" reissue,]="">The reissue oath or declaration< in="" addition="" to="" complying="" with="" the="" requirements="" of="" sec.="" 1.63,="" must="" also="" [file="" with="" their="" applications]="">include< [a="" statement]="">statement(s)< [under="" oath="" or="" declaration]="" as="" follows:="" (1)="" [when]="">That< the="" applicant="" [verily]="" believes="" the="" original="" patent="" to="" be="" wholly="" or="" partly="" inoperative="" or="" invalid="" [,="" stating="" such="" belief="" and="" the="" reasons="" why.="" (2)="" when="" it="" is="" claimed="" that="" such="" patent="" is="" so="" inoperative="" or="" invalid="" ``]="" by="" reason="" of="" a="" defective="" specification="" or="" drawing,="" [``="" particularly="" specifying="" such="" defects.="" (3)="" when="" it="" is="" claimed="" that="" such="" patent="" is="" inoperative="" or="" invalid="" ``]="">or< by="" reason="" of="" the="" patentee="" claiming="" more="" or="" less="" than="" [he]="">patentee< had="" the="" right="" to="" claim="" in="" the="" patent,="" [''="" distinctly="" specifying="" the="" excess="" or="" insufficiency="" in="" the="" claims.]="">and< [(4)]="" [reserved]="" [(5)="" particularly]="">(2) stating< [specifying="" at="" least="" one="" error="" relied="" upon,="" and="" how="" they="" arose="" or="" occurred]="">that all errors being 
    corrected in the reissue application up to the time of filing of the 
    oath or declaration under this paragraph arose without deceptive 
    intention on the part of the applicant<. [(6)]="">(b)(1) For any error corrected not covered by the oath or 
    declaration submitted under paragraph (a) of this section, applicant 
    must submit a supplemental oath or declaration< [stating]="">stating< that=""> every such error< [said="" errors]="" arose="" [``]="" without="" any="" deceptive="" intention="" ['']="" on="" the="" part="" of="" the="" applicant.="">Any supplemental oath or 
    declaration required by this paragraph must be submitted before 
    allowance and may be submitted:
        (i) With any amendment prior to allowance, or
        (ii) In order to overcome a rejection under 35 U.S.C 251 made by 
    the examiner where it is indicated that the submission of a 
    supplemental oath or declaration as required by this paragraph will 
    overcome the rejection.
        (2) For any error sought to be corrected after allowance, a 
    supplemental oath or declaration must accompany the requested 
    correction stating that the error(s) to be corrected arose without any 
    deceptive intention on the part of the applicant.
        (c) Other than as set forth in paragraphs (a)(2) and (b) of this 
    section, an oath or declaration under this section need not 
    specifically identify the error or errors that are being corrected.< [(7)="" acknowledging="" the="" duty="" to="" disclose="" to="" the="" office="" all="" information="" known="" to="" applicants="" to="" be="" material="" to="" patentability="" as="" defined="" in="" sec.="" 1.56.="" (b)="" corroborating="" affidavits="" or="" declarations="" of="" others="" may="" be="" filed="" and="" the="" examiner="" may,="" in="" any="" case,="" require="" additional="" information="" or="" affidavits="" or="" declarations="" concerning="" the="" application="" for="" reissue="" and="" its="" object.]="">(d) The oath or declaration required by paragraph (a) of this 
    section may be submitted under the provisions of Sec. 1.53(d)(1).< 68.="" section="" 1.176="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.176="" examination="" of="" reissue.="" [an="" original="" claim,="" if="" re-presented="" in="" the="" reissue="" application,="" is="" subject="" to="" reexamination,="" and="" the]="">The< entire="">reissue< application="" will="" be="" examined="" in="" the="" same="" manner="" as="" original="" applications,="" subject="" to="" the="" rules="" relating="" thereto,="" excepting="" that="" division="" will="" not="" be="" required="">between the original claims of the patent<. applications="" for="" reissue="" will="" be="" acted="" on="" by="" the="" examiner="" in="" advance="" of="" other="" applications,="" but="" not="" sooner="" than="" two="" months="" after="" the="" announcement="" of="" the="" filing="" of="" the="" reissue="" application="" has="" appeared="" in="" the="" official="" gazette.="" 69.="" section="" 1.177="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.177="">Multiple reissue applications< [reissue="" in="" divisions].="">(a)< the="" commissioner="" [may]="">will pursuant to< [,="" in]="" his="" or="" her="" discretion,="">under 35 U.S.C. 251,< [cause="" several]="">permit multiple 
    reissue< patents="" to="" be="" issued="" for="" distinct="" and="" separate="" parts="" of="" the="" thing="" patented[,upon]="">if the following conditions are met:
        (1) Copending reissue applications for distinct and separate parts 
    of the thing patented have been filed,
        (2) Applicant has filed in each copending application a timely< demand="" [of="" the="" applicant]="">by way of petition for multiple reissue 
    patents,
        (3)< [upon="" payment="" of="" the]="">The< required="">filing and issue< [fee]="">fees< for="" each="" [division]="">copending reissue application have 
    been paid, and
        (4) Each petition for multiple reissue patents is granted prior to 
    issuance of a reissue patent on any of the copending reissue 
    applications.
        (b) Each petition under paragraph (a) of this section must be 
    accompanied by:
        (1) A request for the issuance of multiple reissue patents for 
    distinct and separate parts of the thing patented,
        (2) The petition fee pursuant to Sec. 1.17(i),
        (3) An identification of the other copending reissue 
    application(s),
        (4) A statement that the inventions as claimed in the copending 
    reissue applications are distinct and separate parts of the thing 
    patented, and
        (5) A showing sufficient to establish to the satisfaction of the 
    Commissioner that the claimed subject matter of the thing patented is 
    in fact being divided into distinct and separate parts<. [each="" division="" of="" a="" reissue="" constitutes="" the="" subject="" of="" a="" separate="" specification="" descriptive="" of="" the="" part="" or="" parts="" of="" the="" invention="" claimed="" in="" such="" division;="" and="" the="" drawing="" may="" represent="" only="" such="" part="" or="" parts,="" subject="" to="" the="" provisions="" of="" secs.="" 1.83="" and="" 1.84.]="">(c) When the copending reissue applications are filed at the same 
    time, each petition under paragraph (a) of this section, must be filed 
    no later than the earliest submission of the reissue oath or 
    declaration under Sec. 1.175(a) for any of the copending reissue 
    applications. When the copending reissue applications are filed at 
    different times, each petition under paragraph (a) of this section must 
    be filed no later than the earliest of:
        (1) Payment of the issue fee for any of the copending reissue 
    applications, or
        (2) Submission of the reissue oath or declaration under 
    Sec. 1.175(a) in the later filed copending reissue application.< [on="" filing="" divisional="" reissue="" applications,="" they="" shall="" be="" referred="" to="" the="" commissioner.="" unless="" otherwise="" ordered="" by="" the="" commissioner="" upon="" petition="" and="" payment="" of="" the="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.17(i),="" all="" the="" divisions="" of="" a="" reissue="" will="" issue="" simultaneously,="" if="" there="" is="" any="" controversy="" as="" to="" one="" division,="" the="" others="" will="" be="" withheld="" from="" issue="" until="" the="" controversy="" is="" ended,="" unless="" the="" commissioner="" orders="" otherwise].="">(d) Where the requirements of this section have not been complied 
    with, the Commissioner will not permit multiple reissue patents to be 
    issued.< 70.="" section="" 1.181="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" removing="" paragraphs="" (d),="" (e)="" and="" (g).="" sec.="" 1.181="" petition="" to="" the="" commissioner.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (d)="" [removed].="" (e)="" [removed].="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (g)="" [removed].="" 71.="" section="" 1.182="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" [[page="" 49858]]="" sec.="" 1.182="" questions="" not="" specifically="" provided="" for.="" all="" cases="" not="" specifically="" provided="" for="" in="" the="" regulations="" of="" this="" part="" will="" be="" decided="" in="" accordance="" with="" the="" merits="" of="" each="" case="" by="" or="" under="" the="" authority="" of="" the="" commissioner,="">subject to such other 
    requirements as may be imposed< [and="" such="" decision="" will="" be="" communicated="" to="" the="" interested="" parties="" in="" writing].="" any="" petition="" seeking="" a="" decision="" under="" this="" section="" must="" be="" accompanied="" by="" the="" petition="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.17(h).="" sec.="" 1.184="" [removed="" and="" reserved]="" 72.="" section="" 1.184="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed="" and="" reserved.="" 73.="" section="" 1.191="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraphs="" (a)="" and="" (b)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.191="" appeal="" to="" board="" of="" patent="" appeals="" and="" interferences.="" (a)="" every="" applicant="" for="" a="" patent="" or="" for="" reissue="" of="" a="" patent,="" or="" every="" owner="" of="" a="" patent="" under="" reexamination[,="" any="" of]="">whose claims 
    have< [the="" claims="" of="" which="" have]="" been="" twice="" rejected="">in a particular 
    application or patent under reexamination< [or="" who="" has="" been="" given="" a="" final="" rejection="" (sec.="" 1.113)],="" may="">file an< [,="" upon="" the="" payment="" of="" the="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.17(e),]="" appeal="" from="" the="" decision="" of="" the="" examiner="" to="" the="" board="" of="" patent="" appeals="" and="" interferences="">by filing a 
    notice of appeal and paying the fee set forth in Sec. 1.17(e)< within="" the="" time="" allowed="" for="">reply< [response].="" (b)="" the="">notice of< appeal="" in="" an="" application="" or="" reexamination="" proceeding="" must="" identify="" the="" rejected="" claim="" or="" claims="" appealed,="" and="" must="" be="" signed="" by="" the="" applicant,="" patent="" owner="" or="" duly="" authorized="" attorney="" or="" agent.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 74.="" section="" 1.192="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (a)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.192="" appellant's="" brief.="" (a)="">Appellant< [the="" appellant]="" shall,="" within="" [2]="">two< months="" from="" the="" date="" of="" the="" notice="" of="" appeal="" under="" sec.="" 1.191="" in="" an="" application,="" reissue="" application,="" or="" patent="" under="" reexamination,="" or="" within="" the="" time="" allowed="" for="">reply< [response]="" to="" the="" action="" appealed="" from,="" if="" such="" time="" is="" later,="" file="" a="" brief="" in="" triplicate.="" the="" brief="" must="" be="" accompanied="" by="" the="" requisite="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.17(f)="" and="" must="" set="" forth="" the="" authorities="" and="" arguments="" on="" which="" the="" appellant="" will="" rely="" to="" maintain="" the="" appeal.="" any="" arguments="" or="" authorities="" not="" included="" in="" the="" brief="" may="" be="" refused="" consideration="" by="" the="" board="" of="" patent="" appeals="" and="" interferences.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 75.="" section="" 1.193="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.193="" examiner's="" answer="">and substitute brief<. (a)="">(1)< the="" primary="" examiner="" may,="" within="" such="" time="" as="" may="" be="" directed="" by="" the="" commissioner,="" furnish="" a="" written="" statement="" in="" answer="" to="" [the]="" appellant's="" brief="" including="" such="" explanation="" of="" the="" invention="" claimed="" and="" of="" the="" references="" and="" grounds="" of="" rejection="" as="" may="" be="" necessary,="" supplying="" a="" copy="" to="" [the]="" appellant.="" if="" the="" primary="" examiner="" shall="" find="" that="" the="" appeal="" is="" not="" regular="" in="" form="" or="" does="" not="" relate="" to="" an="" appealable="" action,="" [he]="">the primary examiner< shall="" so="" state="" [and="" a="" petition="" from="" such="" decision="" may="" be="" taken="" to="" the="" commissioner="" as="" provided="" in="" sec.="" 1.181].="">(a)(2) An examiner's answer may not include a new ground of 
    rejection.< (b)="">(1) Appellant< [the="" appellant]="" may="" file="" a="" [reply]="">substitute 
    appeal< brief="" [directed="" only="" to="" such="" new="" points="" of="" argument="" as="" may="" be="" raised="" in="" the]="">under Sec. 1.192 to an< examiner's="" answer,="" within="" two="" months="" from="" the="" date="" of="" [such="" answer]="">the examiner's answer.< [the="" new="" points="" or="" argument="" shall="" be="" specifically="" identified="" in="" the="" reply="" brief.="" if="" the="" examiner="" determines="" that="" the="" reply="" brief="" is="" not="" directed="" only="" to="" new="" points="" of="" argument="" raised="" in="" the="" examiner's="" answer,="" the="" examiner="" may="" refuse="" entry="" of="" the="" reply="" brief="" and="" will="" so="" notify="" the="" appellant.="" if="" the="" examiner's="" answer="" expressly="" states="" that="" it="" includes="" a="" new="" ground="" of="" rejection,="" appellant="" must="" file="" a="" reply="" thereto="" within="" two="" months="" from="" the="" date="" of="" such="" answer="" to="" avoid="" dismissal="" of="" the="" appeal="" as="" to="" the="" claims="" subject="" to="" the="" new="" ground="" of="" rejection;="" such="" reply="" may="" be="" accompanied="" by="" any="" amendment="" or="" material="" appropriate="" to="" then="" new="" ground.]="" see="" sec.="" 1.136(b)="" for="" extensions="" of="" time="" for="" filing="" a="" [reply]="">substitute< brief="" in="" a="" patent="" application="" and="" sec.="" 1.550(c)="" for="" extensions="" of="" time="" in="" a="" reexamination="" proceeding.="">The primary examiner 
    may either acknowledge receipt and entry of the substitute appeal brief 
    or reopen prosecution to respond to any new issues raised in the 
    substitute appeal brief. A substitute examiner's answer is not 
    permitted, except where the application has been remanded by the Board 
    of Patent Appeals and Interferences for such purpose.<>(2) Where prosecution is reopened by the primary examiner after an 
    appeal brief has been filed, an appeal brief under Sec. 1.192 is an 
    appropriate reply by an applicant to the reopening of prosecution if it 
    is accompanied by a request that the appeal be reinstated. If 
    reinstatement of the appeal is elected, no amendments, affidavits 
    (Secs. 1.131 or 1.132) or other new evidence are permitted. If 
    reinstatement of the appeal is not elected, amendments, affidavits and 
    other new evidence are permitted.< 76.="" section="" 1.194="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.194="" oral="" hearing.="" (a)="" an="" oral="" hearing="" should="" be="" requested="" only="" in="" those="" circumstances="" in="" which="" [the]="" appellant="" considers="" such="" a="" hearing="" necessary="" or="" desirable="" for="" a="" proper="" presentation="" of="" [his]="">the< appeal.="" an="" appeal="" decided="" without="" an="" oral="" hearing="" will="" receive="" the="" same="" consideration="" by="" the="" board="" of="" patent="" appeals="" and="" interferences="" as="" appeals="" decided="" after="" oral="" hearing.="" (b)="" if="" appellant="" desires="" an="" oral="" hearing,="" appellant="" must="" file="">, in 
    a separate paper,< a="" written="" request="" for="" such="" hearing="" accompanied="" by="" the="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.17(g)="" within="" two="" months="" after="" the="" date="" of="" the="" examiner's="" answer.="" if="" appellant="" requests="" an="" oral="" hearing="" and="" submits="" therewith="" the="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.17(g),="" an="" oral="" argument="" may="" be="" presented="" by,="" or="" on="" behalf="" of,="" the="" primary="" examiner="" if="" considered="" desirable="" by="" either="" the="" primary="" examiner="" or="" the="" board.="" see="" sec.="" 1.136(b)="" for="" extensions="" of="" time="" for="" requesting="" an="" oral="" hearing="" in="" a="" patent="" application="" and="" sec.="" 1.550(c)="" for="" extensions="" of="" time="" in="" a="" reexamination="" proceeding.="" (c)="" if="" no="" request="" and="" fee="" for="" oral="" hearing="" have="" been="" timely="" filed="" by="" [the]="" appellant,="" the="" appeal="" will="" be="" assigned="" for="" consideration="" and="" decision.="" if="" [the]="" appellant="" has="" requested="" an="" oral="" hearing="" and="" has="" submitted="" the="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.17(g),="" a="" day="" of="" hearing="" will="" be="" set,="" and="" due="" notice="" thereof="" given="" to="" [the]="" appellant="" and="" to="" the="" primary="" examiner.="">A< [hearing]="">hearing< will="" be="" held="" as="" stated="" in="" the="" notice,="" and="" oral="" argument="" will="" be="" limited="" to="" twenty="" minutes="" for="" [the]="" appellant="" and="" fifteen="" minutes="" for="" the="" primary="" examiner="" unless="" otherwise="" ordered="" before="" the="" hearing="" begins.="">If the Board decides that a hearing is not 
    necessary, the Board will so notify appellant.< 77.="" section="" 1.196="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraphs="" (b)="" and="" (d)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.196="" decision="" by="" the="" board="" of="" patent="" appeals="" and="" interferences.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (b)="" should="" the="" board="" of="" patent="" appeals="" and="" interferences="" have="" knowledge="" of="" any="" grounds="" not="" involved="" in="" the="" appeal="" for="" rejecting="" any="" [appealed]="">pending< claim,="" it="" may="" include="" in="" the="" decision="" a="" statement="" to="" that="" effect="" with="" its="" reasons="" for="" so="" holding,="" which="" statement="" shall="" [[page="" 49859]]="" constitute="" a="" new="">ground of< rejection="" of="" the="" [claims]="">claim<. a="" new="">ground of< rejection="" shall="" not="" be="" considered="" final="" for="" purposes="" of="" judicial="" review.="" when="" the="" board="" of="" patent="" appeals="" and="" interferences="" makes="" a="" new="">ground of< rejection="" [of="" an="" appealed="" claim],="" the="" appellant="">, within two months from the date of the decision,< may="" exercise="" [any="" one]="">either< of="" the="" following="" two="" options="" with="" respect="" to="" the="" new="" ground="">of rejection<: (1)="" the="" appellant="" may="" submit="" an="" appropriate="" amendment="" of="" the="" claims="" so="" rejected="" or="" a="" showing="" of="" facts="">relating to the claims so rejected<, or="" both,="" and="" have="" the="" matter="" reconsidered="" by="" the="" examiner="" in="" which="" event="" the="" application="" will="" be="" remanded="" to="" the="" examiner.="" the="" [statement]="">new ground of rejection< shall="" be="" binding="" upon="" the="" examiner="" unless="" an="" amendment="" or="" showing="" of="" facts="" not="" previously="" of="" record="" be="" made="" which,="" in="" the="" opinion="" of="" the="" examiner,="" overcomes="" the="" new="" ground="" [for]="">of< rejection="" stated="" in="" the="" decision.="" should="" the="" examiner="" [again="" reject="" the="" application]="">reject the claims, appellant< [the="" applicant]="" may="" again="" appeal="">pursuant to Secs. 1.191 through 1.195< to="" the="" board="" of="" patent="" appeals="" and="" interferences.="" (2)="" the="" appellant="" may="" have="" the="" case="" reconsidered="" under="" sec.="" 1.197(b)="" by="" the="" board="" of="" patent="" appeals="" and="" interferences="" upon="" the="" same="" record.="" the="" request="" for="" reconsideration="" [shall]="">must< address="" the="" new="" ground="" [for]="">of< rejection="" and="" state="" with="" particularity="" the="" points="" believed="" to="" have="" been="" misapprehended="" or="" overlooked="" in="" rendering="" the="" decision="" and="" also="" state="" all="" other="" grounds="" upon="" which="" reconsideration="" is="" sought.="" where="" request="" for="" such="" reconsideration="" is="" made,="" the="" board="" of="" patent="" appeals="" and="" interferences="" shall="" reconsider="" the="" new="" ground="" [for]="">of< rejection="" and,="" if="" necessary,="" render="" a="" new="" decision="" which="" shall="" include="" all="" grounds="">of rejection< upon="" which="" a="" patent="" is="" refused.="" the="" decision="" on="" reconsideration="" is="" deemed="" to="" incorporate="" the="" earlier="" decision="">for purposes of appeal<, except="" for="" those="" portions="" specifically="" withdrawn="" on="" reconsideration,="" and="" is="" final="" for="" the="" purpose="" of="" judicial="" review="">, except when noted otherwise in the decision<. *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" [(d)="" although="" the="" board="" of="" patent="" appeals="" and="" interferences="" normally="" will="" confine="" its="" decision="" to="" a="" review="" of="" rejections="" made="" by="" the="" examiner,="" should="" it="" have="" knowledge="" of="" any="" grounds="" for="" rejecting="" any="" allowed="" claim="" it="" may="" include="" in="" its="" decision="" a="" recommended="" rejection="" of="" the="" claim="" and="" remand="" the="" case="" to="" the="" examiner.="" in="" such="" event,="" the="" board="" shall="" set="" a="" period,="" not="" less="" than="" one="" month,="" within="" which="" the="" appellant="" may="" submit="" to="" the="" examiner="" an="" appropriate="" amendment,="" a="" showing="" of="" facts="" or="" reasons,="" or="" both,="" in="" order="" to="" avoid="" the="" grounds="" set="" forth="" in="" the="" recommendation="" of="" the="" board="" of="" patent="" appeals="" and="" interferences.="" the="" examiner="" shall="" be="" bound="" by="" the="" recommendation="" and="" shall="" enter="" and="" maintain="" the="" recommended="" rejection="" unless="" an="" amendment="" or="" showing="" of="" facts="" not="" previously="" of="" record="" is="" filed="" which,="" in="" the="" opinion="" of="" the="" examiner,="" overcomes="" the="" recommended="" rejection.="" should="" the="" examiner="" make="" the="" recommended="" rejection="" final="" the="" applicant="" may="" again="" appeal="" to="" the="" board="" of="" patent="" appeals="" and="" interferences.]="">(1) The Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences may require 
    Appellant to address any matter that is deemed appropriate for a 
    reasoned decision on the pending appeal.
        (2) Appellant will be given a time limit within which to reply to 
    the inquiry made under paragraph (d)(1) of this section.< *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 78.="" section="" 1.197="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraphs="" (a)="" and="" (b)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.197="" action="" following="" decision.="" (a)="" after="" decision="" by="" the="" board="" of="" patent="" appeals="" and="" interferences,="" the="" case="" shall="" be="" returned="" to="" the="" examiner,="" subject="" to="" [the]="" appellant's="" right="" of="" appeal="" or="" other="" review,="" for="" such="" further="" action="" by="" [the]="" appellant="" or="" by="" the="" examiner,="" as="" the="" condition="" of="" the="" case="" may="" require,="" to="" carry="" into="" effect="" the="" decision.="" (b)="" a="" single="" request="" for="" reconsideration="" or="" modification="" of="" the="" decision="" may="" be="" made="" if="" filed="" within="">two months< [one="" month]="" from="" the="" date="" of="" the="" original="" decision,="" unless="" the="" original="" decision="" is="" so="" modified="" by="" the="" decision="" on="" reconsideration="" as="" to="" become,="" in="" effect,="" a="" new="" decision,="" and="" the="" board="" of="" patent="" appeals="" and="" interferences="" so="" states.="" the="" request="" for="" reconsideration="" shall="" state="" with="" particularity="" the="" points="" believed="" to="" have="" been="" misapprehended="" or="" overlooked="" in="" rendering="" the="" decision="" and="" also="" state="" all="" other="" grounds="" upon="" which="" reconsideration="" is="" sought.="" see="" sec.="" 1.136(b)="" for="" extensions="" of="" time="" for="" seeking="" reconsideration="" in="" a="" patent="" application="" and="" sec.="" 1.550(c)="" for="" extensions="" of="" time="" in="" a="" reexamination="" proceeding.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 79.="" section="" 1.291="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (c)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.291="" protests="" by="" the="" public="" against="" pending="" applications.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (c)="" a="" member="" of="" the="" public="" filing="" a="" protest="" in="" an="" application="" under="" paragraph="" (a)="" of="" this="" section="" will="" not="" receive="" any="" communications="" from="" the="" office="" relating="" to="" the="" protest,="" other="" than="" the="" return="" of="" a="" self-="" addressed="" postcard="" which="" the="" member="" of="" the="" public="" may="" include="" with="" the="" protest="" in="" order="" to="" receive="" an="" acknowledgment="" by="" the="" office="" that="" the="" protest="" has="" been="" received.="" the="" office="" may="" communicate="" with="" the="" applicant="" regarding="" any="" protest="" and="" may="" require="" the="" applicant="" to="">reply< [respond]="" to="" specific="" questions="" raised="" by="" the="" protest.="" in="" the="" absence="" of="" a="" request="" by="" the="" office,="" an="" applicant="" has="" no="" duty="" to,="" and="" need="" not,="">reply< [respond]="" to="" a="" protest.="" the="" limited="" involvement="" of="" the="" member="" of="" the="" public="" filing="" a="" protest="" pursuant="" to="" paragraph="" (a)="" of="" this="" section="" ends="" with="" the="" filing="" of="" the="" protest,="" and="" no="" further="" submission="" on="" behalf="" of="" the="" protestor="" will="" be="" considered="">,except for 
    additional prior art, or< unless="" such="" submission="" raises="" new="" issues="" which="" could="" not="" have="" been="" earlier="" presented.="" 80.="" section="" 1.294="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (b)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.294="" examination="" of="" request="" for="" publication="" of="" a="" statutory="" invention="" registration="" and="" patent="" application="" to="" which="" the="" request="" is="" directed.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (b)="" applicant="" will="" be="" notified="" of="" the="" results="" of="" the="" examination="" set="" forth="" in="" paragraph="" (a)="" of="" this="" section.="" if="" the="" requirements="" of="" sec.="" 1.293="" and="" this="" section="" are="" not="" met="" by="" the="" request="" filed,="" the="" notification="" to="" applicant="" will="" set="" a="" period="" of="" time="" within="" which="" to="" comply="" with="" the="" requirements="" in="" order="" to="" avoid="" abandonment="" of="" the="" application.="" if="" the="" application="" does="" not="" meet="" the="" requirements="" of="" 35="" u.s.c.="" 112,="" the="" notification="" to="" applicant="" will="" include="" a="" rejection="" under="" the="" appropriate="" provisions="" of="" 35="" u.s.c.="" 112.="" the="" periods="" for="">reply< [response]="" established="" pursuant="" to="" this="" section="" are="" subject="" to="" the="" extension="" of="" time="" provisions="" of="" sec.="" 1.136.="" after="">reply< [response]="" by="" the="" applicant,="" the="" application="" will="" again="" be="" considered="" for="" publication="" of="" a="" statutory="" invention="" registration.="" if="" the="" requirements="" of="" sec.="" 1.293="" and="" this="" section="" are="" not="" timely="" met,="" the="" refusal="" to="" publish="" will="" be="" made="" final.="" if="" the="" requirements="" of="" 35="" u.s.c.="" 112="" are="" not="" met,="" the="" rejection="" pursuant="" to="" 35="" u.s.c.="" 112="" will="" be="" made="" final.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" [[page="" 49860]]="" 81.="" section="" 1.304="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (a)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.304="" time="" for="" appeal="" or="" civil="" action.="" (a)(1)="" the="" time="" for="" filing="" the="" notice="" of="" appeal="" to="" the="" u.s.="" court="" of="" appeals="" for="" the="" federal="" circuit="" (sec.="" 1.302)="" or="" for="" commencing="" a="" civil="" action="" (sec.="" 1.303)="" is="" two="" months="" from="" the="" date="" of="" the="" decision="" of="" the="" board="" of="" patent="" appeals="" and="" interferences.="" if="" a="" request="" for="" [consideration]="">reconsideration< or="" modification="" of="" the="" decision="" is="" filed="" within="" the="" time="" period="" provided="" under="" sec.="" 1.197(b)="" or="" sec.="" 1.658(b),="" the="" time="" for="" filing="" an="" appeal="" or="" commencing="" a="" civil="" action="" shall="" expire="" two="" months="" after="" action="" on="" the="" request.="" in="" interferences,="" the="" time="" for="" filing="" a="" cross-appeal="" or="" cross-action="" expires:="" (i)="" 14="" days="" after="" service="" of="" the="" notice="" of="" appeal="" or="" the="" summons="" and="" complaint,="" or="" (ii)="" two="" months="" after="" the="" date="" of="" decision="" of="" the="" board="" of="" patent="" appeals="" and="" interferences,="" whichever="" is="" later.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 82.="" section="" 1.312="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (b)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.312="" amendments="" after="" allowance.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (b)="" any="" amendment="" pursuant="" to="" paragraph="" (a)="" of="" this="" section="" filed="" after="" the="" date="" the="" issue="" fee="" is="" paid="" must="" be="" accompanied="" by="" a="" petition="" including="" the="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.17(i)="" and="" a="" showing="" of="" good="" and="" sufficient="" reasons="" why="" the="" amendment="" is="" necessary="" and="" was="" not="" earlier="" presented.="">For reissue applications, see Sec. 1.175(b), which requires 
    a supplemental oath or declaration to accompany the amendment.< 83.="" section="" 1.313="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" adding="" a="" new="" paragraph="" (c)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.313="" withdrawal="" from="" issue.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="">(c) Unless an applicant receives written notification that the 
    application has been withdrawn from issue at least two weeks prior to 
    the projected date of issue, applicant should expect that the 
    application will issue as a patent.< 84.="" section="" 1.316="" paragraphs="" (b)="" through="" (f)="" are="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed.="" sec.="" 1.316="" application="" abandoned="" for="" failure="" to="" pay="" issue="" fee.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (b)="" [removed].="" (c)="" [removed].="" (d)="" [removed].="" (e)="" [removed].="" (f)="" [removed].="" 85.="" section="" 1.317="" paragraphs="" (b)="" through="" (f)="" are="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed.="" sec.="" 1.317="" lapsed="" patents;="" delayed="" payment="" of="" balance="" of="" issue="" fee.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (b)="" [removed].="" (c)="" [removed].="" (d)="" [removed].="" (e)="" [removed].="" (f)="" [removed].="" sec.="" 1.318="" [removed="" and="" reserved].="" 86.="" section="" 1.318="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed="" and="" reserved.="" 87.="" section="" 1.324="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.324="" correction="" of="" inventorship="" in="" patent.="">(a) Whenever through error a person is named in an issued patent 
    as the inventor, or through error an inventor is not named in an issued 
    patent and such error arose without any deceptive intention on his or 
    her part, < [whenever="" a="" patent="" is="" issued="" and="" it="" appears="" that="" the="" correct="" inventor="" or="" inventors="" were="" not="" named="" through="" error="" without="" deceptive="" intention="" on="" the="" part="" of="" the="" actual="" inventor="" or="" inventors,]="" the="" commissioner="" may,="" on="" petition="" [of="" all="" the="" parties="" and="" the="" assignees="" and="" satisfactory="" proof="" of="" the="" facts="" and="" payment="" of="" the="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.20(b)],="" or="" on="" order="" of="" a="" court="" before="" which="" such="" matter="" is="" called="" in="" question,="" issue="" a="" certificate="" naming="" only="" the="" actual="" inventor="" or="" inventors.="" a="">petition< [request]="" to="" correct="" inventorship="" of="" a="" patent="" involved="" in="" an="" interference="" shall="" comply="" with="" the="" requirements="" of="" this="" section="" and="" shall="" be="" accompanied="" by="" a="" motion="" under="" sec.="" 1.634.="">(b) Any petition pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section must be 
    accompanied by:
        (1) A statement from each person who is being added as an inventor 
    and from each person who is being deleted as an inventor that the 
    inventorship error occurred without any deceptive intention on their 
    part;
        (2) A statement from the current named inventors who have not 
    submitted a statement under paragraph (b)(1) of this section either 
    agreeing to the change of inventorship or stating that they have no 
    disagreement in regard to the requested change;
        (3) A statement from all assignees of the parties submitting a 
    statement under paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this section agreeing 
    to the change of inventorship in the patent; such statement must comply 
    with the requirements of Sec. 3.73(b); and
        (4) The fee set forth in Sec. 1.20(b).< sec.="" 1.325="" [removed="" and="" reserved]="" 88.="" section="" 1.325="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed="" and="" reserved.="" sec.="" 1.351="" [removed="" and="" reserved]="" 89.="" sections="" 1.351="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed="" and="" reserved.="" sec.="" 1.352="" [removed="" and="" reserved]="" 90.="" section="" 1.352="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed="" and="" reserved.="" 91.="" section="" 1.366="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraphs="" (b)="" through="" (d)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.366="" submission="" of="" maintenance="" fees.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (b)="" a="" maintenance="" fee="" and="" any="" necessary="" surcharge="" submitted="" for="" a="" patent="" must="" be="" submitted="" in="" the="" amount="" due="" on="" the="" date="" the="" maintenance="" fee="" and="" any="" necessary="" surcharge="" are="" paid="" and="" may="" be="" paid="" in="" the="" manner="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.23="" or="" by="" an="" authorization="" to="" charge="" a="" deposit="" account="" established="" pursuant="" to="" sec.="" 1.25.="" payment="" of="" a="" maintenance="" fee="" and="" any="" necessary="" surcharge="" or="" the="" authorization="" to="" charge="" a="" deposit="" account="" must="" be="" submitted="" within="" the="" periods="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.362(d),="" (e),="" or="" (f).="" any="" payment="" or="" authorization="" of="" maintenance="" fees="" and="" surcharges="" filed="" at="" any="" other="" time="" will="" not="" be="" accepted="" and="" will="" not="" serve="" as="" a="" payment="" of="" the="" maintenance="" fee="" except="" insofar="" as="" a="" delayed="" payment="" of="" the="" maintenance="" fee="" is="" accepted="" by="" the="" commissioner="" in="" an="" expired="" patent="" pursuant="" to="" a="" petition="" filed="" under="" sec.="" 1.378.="" any="" authorization="" to="" charge="" a="" deposit="" account="" must="" authorize="" the="" immediate="" charging="" of="" the="" maintenance="" fee="" and="" any="" necessary="" surcharge="" to="" the="" deposit="" account.="" payment="" of="" less="" than="" the="" required="" amount,="" payment="" in="" a="" manner="" other="" than="" that="" set="" forth="" in="" the="" filing="" of="" an="" authorization="" to="" charge="" a="" deposit="" account="" having="" insufficient="" funds="" will="" not="" constitute="" payment="" of="" a="" maintenance="" fee="" or="" surcharge="" on="" a="" patent.="" the="" [certificate]="" procedures="" of="" either="" sec.="" 1.8="" or="" sec.="" 1.10="" may="" be="" utilized="" in="" paying="" maintenance="" fees="" and="" any="" necessary="" surcharges.="" (c)="" in="" submitting="" maintenance="" fees="" and="" any="" necessary="" surcharges,="" identification="" of="" the="" patents="" for="" which="" maintenance="" fees="" are="" being="" paid="" must="" include="" the="" following:="" (1)="" the="" patent="" number,="" and="" (2)="" the="" [serial]="">application< number="" of="" the="" united="" states="" application="" for="" the="" patent="" on="" which="" the="" maintenance="" fee="" is="" being="" paid.="" (d)="" payment="" of="" maintenance="" fees="" and="" any="" surcharges="" should="" identify="" the="" fee="" being="" paid="" for="" each="" patent="" as="" to="" whether="" it="" is="" the="" 3\1/2\-,7\1/="" 2\-,="" or="" 11\1/2\-year="" fee,="" whether="" small="" entity="" status="" is="" being="" [[page="" 49861]]="" changed="" or="" claimed,="" the="" amount="" of="" the="" maintenance="" fee="" and="" any="" surcharge="" being="" paid,="" and="" any="" assigned="" payor="" number[,="" the="" patent="" issue="" date="" and="" the="" united="" states="" application="" filing="" date].="" if="" the="" maintenance="" fee="" and="" any="" necessary="" surcharge="" is="" being="" paid="" on="" a="" reissue="" patent,="" the="" payment="" must="" identify="" the="" reissue="" patent="" by="" reissue="" patent="" number="" and="" reissue="" application="" [serial]="" number="" as="" required="" by="" paragraph="" (c)="" of="" this="" section="" and="" should="" also="" include="" the="" original="" patent="" number[,="" the="" original="" patent="" issue="" date,="" and="" the="" original="" united="" states="" application="" filing="" date].="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 92.="" section="" 1.377="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (c)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.377="" review="" of="" decision="" refusing="" to="" accept="" and="" record="" payment="" of="" a="" maintenance="" fee="" filed="" prior="" to="" expiration="" of="" patent.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (c)="" any="" petition="" filed="" under="" this="" section="" must="" comply="" with="" the="" requirements="" of="" paragraph="" (b)="" of="" sec.="" 1.181="" and="" must="" be="" signed="" by="" an="" attorney="" or="" agent="" registered="" to="" practice="" before="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office,="" or="" by="" the="" patentee,="" the="" assignee,="" or="" other="" party="" in="" interest.="" [such="" petition="" must="" be="" in="" the="" form="" of="" a="" verified="" statement="" if="" made="" by="" a="" person="" not="" registered="" to="" practice="" before="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office.]="" 93.="" section="" 1.378="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (d)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.378="" acceptance="" of="" delayed="" payment="" of="" maintenance="" fee="" in="" expired="" patent="" to="" reinstate="" patent.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (d)="" any="" petition="" under="" this="" section="" must="" be="" signed="" by="" an="" attorney="" or="" agent="" registered="" to="" practice="" before="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office,="" or="" by="" the="" patentee,="" the="" assignee,="" or="" other="" party="" in="" interest.="" [such="" petition="" must="" be="" in="" the="" form="" of="" a="" verified="" statement="" if="" made="" by="" a="" person="" not="" registered="" to="" practice="" before="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office.]="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 94.="" section="" 1.425="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.425="" filing="" by="" other="" than="" inventor.="" [(a)="" if="" a="" joint="" inventor="" refuses="" to="" join="" in="" an="" international="" application="" which="" designates="" the="" united="" states="" of="" america="" or="" cannot="" be="" found="" or="" reached="" after="" diligent="" effort,="" the="" international="" application="" which="" designates="" the="" united="" states="" of="" america="" may="" be="" filed="" by="" the="" other="" inventor="" on="" behalf="" of="" himself="" or="" herself="" and="" the="" omitted="" inventor.="" such="" an="" international="" application="" which="" designates="" the="" united="" states="" of="" america="" must="" be="" accompanied="" by="" proof="" of="" the="" pertinent="" facts="" and="" must="" state="" the="" last="" known="" address="" of="" the="" omitted="" inventor.="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office="" shall="" forward="" notice="" of="" the="" filing="" of="" the="" international="" application="" to="" the="" omitted="" inventor="" at="" said="" address.="" (b)="" whenever="" an="" inventor="" refuses="" to="" execute="" an="" international="" application="" which="" designates="" the="" united="" states="" of="" america,="" or="" cannot="" be="" found="" or="" reached="" after="" diligent="" effort,="" a="" person="" to="" whom="" the="" inventor="" has="" assigned="" or="" agreed="" in="" writing="" to="" assign="" the="" invention="" or="" who="" otherwise="" shows="" sufficient="" proprietary="" interest="" in="" the="" matter="" justifying="" such="" action="" may="" file="" the="" international="" application="" on="" behalf="" of="" and="" as="" agent="" for="" the="" inventor.="" such="" an="" international="" application="" which="" designates="" the="" united="" states="" of="" america="" must="" be="" accompanied="" by="" proof="" of="" the="" pertinent="" facts="" and="" a="" showing="" that="" such="" action="" is="" necessary="" to="" preserve="" the="" rights="" of="" the="" parties="" or="" to="" prevent="" irreparable="" damage="" and="" must="" state="" the="" last="" known="" address="" of="" the="" inventor.="" the="" assignment,="" written="" agreement="" to="" assign="" or="" other="" evidence="" of="" proprietary="" interest,="" or="" a="" verified="" copy="" thereof,="" must="" be="" filed="" in="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office.="" the="" office="" shall="" forward="" notice="" of="" the="" filing="" of="" the="" application="" to="" the="" inventor="" at="" the="" address="" stated="" in="" the="" application.]="" where="" an="" international="" application="" which="" designates="" the="" united="" states="" of="" america="" is="" filed="" and="" where="" one="" or="" more="" inventors="" refuse="" to="" sign="" the="" request="" for="" the="" international="" application="" or="" could="" not="" be="" found="" or="" reached="" after="" diligent="" effort,="" the="" request="" need="" not="" be="" signed="" by="" such="" inventor="" if="" it="" is="" signed="" by="" another="" applicant.="" such="" international="" application="" must="" be="" accompanied="" by="" a="" statement="" explaining="" to="" the="" satisfaction="" of="" the="" commissioner="" the="" lack="" of="" the="" signature="" concerned.="" 95.="" section="" 1.484="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraphs="" (d)="" through="" (f)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.484="" conduct="" of="" international="" preliminary="" examination.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (d)="" the="" international="" preliminary="" examining="" authority="" will="" establish="" a="" written="" opinion="" if="" any="" defect="" exists="" or="" if="" the="" claimed="" invention="" lacks="" novelty,="" inventive="" step="" or="" industrial="" applicability="" and="" will="" set="" a="" non-extendable="" time="" limit="" in="" the="" written="" opinion="" for="" the="" applicant="" to="">reply< [respond].="" (e)="" if="" no="" written="" opinion="" under="" paragraph="" (d)="" of="" this="" section="" is="" necessary,="" or="" after="" any="" written="" opinion="" and="" the="">reply< [response]="" thereto="" or="" the="" expiration="" of="" the="" time="" limit="" for="">reply< [response]="" to="" such="" written="" opinion,="" an="" international="" preliminary="" examination="" report="" will="" be="" established="" by="" the="" international="" preliminary="" examining="" authority.="" one="" copy="" will="" be="" submitted="" to="" the="" international="" bureau="" and="" one="" copy="" will="" be="" submitted="" to="" the="" applicant.="" (f)="" an="" applicant="" will="" be="" permitted="" a="" personal="" or="" telephone="" interview="" with="" the="" examiner,="" which="" must="" be="" conducted="" during="" the="" non-="" extendable="" time="" limit="" for="">reply< [response]="" by="" the="" applicant="" to="" a="" written="" opinion.="" additional="" interviews="" may="" be="" conducted="" where="" the="" examiner="" determines="" that="" such="" additional="" interviews="" may="" be="" helpful="" to="" advancing="" the="" international="" preliminary="" examination="" procedure.="" a="" summary="" of="" any="" such="" personal="" or="" telephone="" interview="" must="" be="" filed="" by="" the="" applicant="" as="" a="" part="" of="" the="">reply< [response]="" to="" the="" written="" opinion="" or,="" if="" applicant="" files="" no="">reply< [response],="" be="" made="" of="" record="" in="" the="" file="" by="" the="" examiner.="" 96.="" section="" 1.485="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (a)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.485="" amendments="" by="" applicant="" during="" international="" preliminary="" examination.="" (a)="" the="" applicant="" may="" make="" amendments="" at="" the="" time="" of="" filing="" of="" the="" demand="" and="" within="" the="" time="" limit="" set="" by="" the="" international="" preliminary="" examining="" authority="" for="">reply< [response]="" to="" any="" notification="" under="" sec.="" 1.484(b)="" or="" to="" any="" written="" opinion.="" any="" such="" amendments="" must:="" (1)="" be="" made="" by="" submitting="" a="" replacement="" sheet="" for="" every="" sheet="" of="" the="" application="" which="" differs="" from="" the="" sheet="" it="" replaces="" unless="" an="" entire="" sheet="" is="" cancelled,="" and="" (2)="" include="" a="" description="" of="" how="" the="" replacement="" sheet="" differs="" from="" the="" replaced="" sheet.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 97.="" section="" 1.488="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (b)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.488="" determination="" of="" unity="" of="" invention="" before="" the="" international="" preliminary="" examining="" authority.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (b)="" if="" the="" international="" preliminary="" examining="" authority="" considers="" that="" the="" international="" application="" does="" not="" comply="" with="" the="" requirement="" of="" unity="" of="" invention,="" it="" may:="" (1)="" issue="" a="" written="" opinion="" and/or="" an="" international="" preliminary="" examination="" report,="" in="" respect="" of="" the="" entire="" international="" application="" and="" indicate="" that="" unity="" of="" invention="" is="" lacking="" and="" specify="" the="" reasons="" therefor="" without="" extending="" an="" invitation="" to="" restrict="" or="" pay="" additional="" fees.="" no="" international="" preliminary="" examination="" will="" be="" conducted="" on="" inventions="" not="" previously="" [[page="" 49862]]="" searched="" by="" an="" international="" searching="" authority.="" (2)="" invite="" the="" applicant="" to="" restrict="" the="" claims="" or="" pay="" additional="" fees,="" pointing="" out="" the="" categories="" of="" the="" invention="" found,="" within="" a="" set="" time="" limit="" which="" will="" not="" be="" extended.="" no="" international="" preliminary="" examination="" will="" be="" conducted="" on="" inventions="" not="" previously="" searched="" by="" an="" international="" preliminary="" examining="" authority,="" or="" (3)="" if="" applicant="" fails="" to="" restrict="" the="" claims="" or="" pay="" additional="" fees="" within="" the="" time="" limit="" set="" for="">reply< [response],="" the="" international="" preliminary="" examining="" authority="" will="" issue="" a="" written="" opinion="" and/or="" establish="" an="" international="" preliminary="" examination="" report="" on="" the="" main="" invention="" and="" shall="" indicate="" the="" relevant="" facts="" in="" the="" said="" report.="" in="" case="" of="" any="" doubt="" as="" to="" which="" invention="" is="" the="" main="" invention,="" the="" invention="" first="" mentioned="" in="" the="" claims="" and="" previously="" searched="" by="" an="" international="" searching="" authority="" shall="" be="" considered="" the="" main="" invention.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 98.="" section="" 1.492="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" adding="" a="" new="" paragraph="" (g)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.492="" national="" stage="" fees.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="">(g) If the additional fees required by paragraphs (b), (c), and 
    (d) are not paid on presentation of the claims for which the additional 
    fees are due, they must be paid or the claims cancelled by amendment, 
    prior to the expiration of the time period set for reply by the Office 
    in any notice of fee deficiency.< 99.="" section="" 1.494="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (c)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.494="" entering="" the="" national="" stage="" in="" the="" united="" states="" of="" america="" as="" a="" designated="" office.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (c)="" if="" applicant="" complies="" with="" paragraph="" (b)="" of="" this="" section="" before="" expiration="" of="" 20="" months="" from="" the="" priority="" date="" but="" omits:="" (1)="" a="" translation="" of="" the="" international="" application,="" as="" filed,="" into="" the="" english="" language,="" if="" it="" was="" originally="" filed="" in="" another="" language="" (35="" u.s.c.="" 371(c)(2))="" and/or="" (2)="" the="" oath="" or="" declaration="" of="" the="" inventor="" (35="" u.s.c.="" 371(c)(4);="" see="" sec.="" 1.497),="" applicant="" will="" be="" so="" notified="" and="" given="" a="" period="" of="" time="" within="" which="" to="" file="" the="" translation="" and/or="" oath="" or="" declaration="" in="" order="" to="" prevent="" abandonment="" of="" the="" application.="" the="" payment="" of="" the="" processing="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.492(f)="" is="" required="" for="" acceptance="" of="" an="" english="" translation="" later="" than="" the="" expiration="" of="" 20="" months="" after="" the="" priority="" date.="" the="" payment="" of="" the="" surcharge="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.492(e)="" is="" required="" for="" acceptance="" of="" the="" oath="" or="" declaration="" of="" the="" inventor="" later="" than="" the="" expiration="" of="" 20="" months="" after="" the="" priority="" date.="" a="" copy="" of="" the="" notification="" mailed="" to="" applicant="" should="" accompany="" any="">reply< [response]="" thereto="" submitted="" to="" the="" office.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 100.="" section="" 1.495="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (c)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.495="" entering="" the="" national="" stage="" in="" the="" united="" states="" of="" america="" as="" an="" elected="" office.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (c)="" if="" applicant="" complies="" with="" paragraph="" (b)="" of="" this="" section="" before="" expiration="" of="" 30="" months="" from="" the="" priority="" date="" but="" omits:="" (1)="" a="" translation="" of="" the="" international="" application,="" as="" filed,="" into="" the="" english="" language,="" if="" it="" was="" originally="" filed="" in="" another="" language="" (35="" u.s.c.="" 371(c)(2))="" and/or="" (2)="" the="" oath="" or="" declaration="" of="" the="" inventor="" (35="" u.s.c.="" 371(c)(4);="" see="" sec.="" 1.497),="" applicant="" will="" be="" so="" notified="" and="" given="" a="" period="" of="" time="" within="" which="" to="" file="" the="" translation="" and/or="" oath="" or="" declaration="" in="" order="" to="" prevent="" abandonment="" of="" the="" application.="" the="" payment="" of="" the="" processing="" fee="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.492(f)="" is="" required="" for="" acceptance="" of="" an="" english="" translation="" later="" than="" the="" expiration="" of="" 30="" months="" after="" the="" priority="" date.="" the="" payment="" of="" the="" surcharge="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 1.492(e)="" is="" required="" for="" acceptance="" of="" the="" oath="" or="" declaration="" of="" the="" inventor="" later="" than="" the="" expiration="" of="" 30="" months="" after="" the="" priority="" date.="" a="" copy="" of="" the="" notification="" mailed="" to="" applicant="" should="" accompany="" any="">reply< [response]="" thereto="" submitted="" to="" the="" office.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 101.="" section="" 1.510="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (e)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.510="" request="" for="" reexamination.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (e)="" a="" request="" filed="" by="" the="" patent="" owner="" may="" include="" a="" proposed="" amendment="" in="" accordance="" with="" [sec.="" 1.121(f)]="">Sec. 1.530(d)<. 102.="" section="" 1.530="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" the="" heading="" and="" paragraphs="" (a)="" and="" (d)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.530="" statement="" and="" [amendment]="">reply< by="" patent="" owner.="" (a)="" except="" as="" provided="" in="" sec.="" 1.510(e),="" no="" statement="" or="" other="">reply< [response]="" by="" the="" patent="" owner="" shall="" be="" filed="" prior="" to="" the="" determinations="" made="" in="" accordance="" with="" secs.="" 1.515="" or="" 1.520.="" if="" a="" premature="" statement="" or="" other="">reply< [response]="" is="" filed="" by="" the="" patent="" owner="" it="" will="" not="" be="" acknowledged="" or="" considered="" in="" making="" the="" determination.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" [(d)="" any="" proposed="" amendment="" to="" the="" description="" and="" claims="" must="" be="" made="" in="" accordance="" with="" sec.="" 1.121(f).="" no="" amendment="" may="" enlarge="" the="" scope="" of="" the="" claims="" of="" the="" patent="" or="" introduce="" new="" matter.="" no="" amended="" or="" new="" claims="" may="" be="" proposed="" for="" entry="" in="" an="" expired="" patent.="" moreover,="" no="" amended="" or="" new="" claims="" will="" be="" incorporated="" into="" the="" patent="" by="" certificate="" issued="" after="" the="" expiration="" of="" the="" patent.]="">(d) Amendments in reexamination proceedings: Amendments in 
    reexamination proceedings are made by filing a paper, in compliance 
    with paragraph (d)(5) of this section, directing that specified 
    amendments be made.
        (1) Specification other than claims: Amendments to the 
    specification other than claims may only be made as follows:
        (i) The precise point in the specification must be indicated where 
    an amendment is to be made.
        (ii) Amendments must be made by submission of the entire text of 
    the rewritten paragraph(s) with markings pursuant to paragraph 
    (d)(1)(iv) of this section.
        (iii) Each submission of an amendment to the specification of the 
    patent must include all amendments to the specification relative to the 
    patent as of the date of the submission. This would include amendments 
    to the specification of the patent submitted for the first time as well 
    as any previously submitted amendments that are still desired. Any 
    previously submitted amendments to the specification that are no longer 
    desired must not be included in the submission.
        (iv) Underlining below the subject matter added to the patent and 
    brackets around the subject matter deleted from the patent are to be 
    used to mark the amendments being made.
        (2) Claims: Amendments to the claims are made as follows:
        (i)(A) The amendment must include the entire text of each patent 
    claim which is amended and each proposed claim with marking pursuant to 
    paragraph (d)(2)(i)(C) of this section, except a patent or proposed 
    claim should be cancelled by a statement cancelling the patent or 
    proposed claim without presentation of the text of the patent or 
    proposed claim.
        (B) Patent claims must not be renumbered and the numbering of any
    
    [[Page 49863]]
    
    claims proposed to be added to the patent must follow the number of the 
    highest numbered patent claim.
        (C) Underlining below the subject matter added to the patent and 
    brackets around the subject matter deleted from the patent are to be 
    used to mark the amendments being made. If a claim is amended pursuant 
    to paragraph (d)(2)(i)(A) of this section, a parenthetical expression 
    ``amended,'' ``twice amended,'' etc., should follow the original claim 
    number.
        (ii) Each amendment submission must set forth the status, as of the 
    date of the amendment, of all patent claims, of all claims currently 
    proposed, and of all previously proposed claims that are no longer 
    being proposed.
        (iii) Each amendment when originally submitted must be accompanied 
    by an explanation of the support in the disclosure of the patent for 
    the amendment along with any additional comments on page(s) separate 
    from the page(s) containing the amendment.
        (iv) Each submission of an amendment to any claim (patent claims 
    and all proposed claims) must include all amendments to the claims as 
    of the date of the submission. This would include amendments to the 
    claims submitted for the first time as well as any previously submitted 
    amendments to the claims that are still desired. Any previously 
    submitted amendments to the claims that are no longer desired must not 
    be included in the submission. A copy of any patent claims that have 
    not been amended are not to be presented with each amendment 
    submission.
        (v) The failure to submit a copy of any proposed claim will be 
    construed as a direction to cancel that claim.
        (3) No amendment may enlarge the scope of the claims of the patent 
    or introduce new matter. No amendment may be proposed for entry in an 
    expired patent. Moreover, no amendment will be incorporated into the 
    patent by certificate issued after the expiration of the patent.
        (4) Amendments made to a patent during a reexamination proceeding 
    will not be effective until a reexamination certificate is issued.
        (5) The form of replies, amendments, briefs, appendices and other 
    papers must be in accordance with the following requirements. All 
    documents, including any amendments or corrections thereto, must be in 
    the English language. All papers which are to become a part of the 
    permanent records of the Patent and Trademark Office must be legibly 
    written either by a typewriter or mechanical printer in permanent dark 
    ink or its equivalent in portrait orientation on flexible, strong, 
    smooth, non-shiny, durable, and white paper. All printed matter must 
    appear in at least 11 point type. All of the papers must be presented 
    in a form having sufficient clarity and contrast between the paper and 
    the writing thereon to permit the direct reproduction of readily 
    legible copies in any number by use of photographic, electrostatic, 
    photo-offset, and microfilming processes and electronic reproduction by 
    use of digital imaging and optical character recognition. If the papers 
    are not of the required quality, substitute typewritten or mechanically 
    printed papers of suitable quality will be required. The papers, 
    including the drawings, must have each page plainly written on only one 
    side of a sheet of paper. The sheets of paper must be the same size and 
    either 21.0 cm. by 29.7 cm. (DIN size A4) or 21.6 cm. by 27.9 cm. (8\1/
    2\ by 11 inches). Each sheet must include a top margin of at least 2.0 
    cm. (\3/4\ inch), a left side margin of at least 2.5 cm. (1 inch), a 
    right side margin of at least 2.0 cm. (\3/4\ inch), and a bottom margin 
    of at least 2.0 cm. (\3/4\ inch), and no holes should be made in the 
    sheets as submitted. The lines must be 1\1/2\ or double spaced. The 
    pages must be numbered consecutively, starting with 1, the numbers 
    being centrally located above or preferably, below, the text.
        (6) Drawings: The original patent drawing sheets may not be 
    altered. Any proposed change to the patent drawings must be by way of a 
    new sheet of drawings with the amended figures identified as 
    ``amended'' and with added figures identified as ``new'' for each sheet 
    changed submitted in compliance with Sec. 1.84< *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 103.="" section="" 1.550="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraphs="" (a),="" (b)="" and="" (d)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.550="" conduct="" of="" reexamination="" proceedings.="" (a)="" all="" reexamination="" proceedings,="" including="" any="" appeals="" to="" the="" board="" of="" patent="" appeals="" and="" interferences,="" will="" be="" conducted="" with="" special="" dispatch="" within="" the="" office.="" after="" issuance="" of="" the="" reexamination="" order="" and="" expiration="" of="" the="" time="" for="" submitting="" any="">replies< [responses]="" thereto,="" the="" examination="" will="" be="" conducted="" in="" accordance="" with="" secs.="" 1.104="" through="" 1.116="" and="" will="" result="" in="" the="" issuance="" of="" a="" reexamination="" certificate="" under="" sec.="" 1.570.="" (b)="" the="" patent="" owner="" will="" be="" given="" at="" least="" [30]="">thirty< days="" to="">reply< [respond]="" to="" any="" office="" action.="" such="">reply< [response]="" may="" include="" further="" statements="" in="">reply< [response]="" to="" any="" rejections="" and/="" or="" proposed="" amendments="" or="" new="" claims="" to="" place="" the="" patent="" in="" a="" condition="" where="" all="" claims,="" if="" amended="" as="" proposed,="" would="" be="" patentable.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (d)="" if="" the="" patent="" owner="" fails="" to="" file="" a="" timely="" and="" appropriate="">reply< [response]="" to="" any="" office="" action,="" the="" reexamination="" proceeding="" will="" be="" terminated="" and="" the="" commissioner="" will="" proceed="" to="" issue="" a="" certificate="" under="" sec.="" 1.570="" in="" accordance="" with="" the="" last="" action="" of="" the="" office.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 104.="" section="" 1.560="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (b)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.560="" interviews="" in="" reexamination="" proceedings.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (b)="" in="" every="" instance="" of="" an="" interview="" with="" an="" examiner,="" a="" complete="" written="" statement="" of="" the="" reasons="" presented="" at="" the="" interview="" as="" warranting="" favorable="" action="" must="" be="" filed="" by="" the="" patent="" owner.="" an="" interview="" does="" not="" remove="" the="" necessity="" for="">reply< [response]="" to="" office="" actions="" as="" specified="" in="" sec.="" 1.111.="" 105.="" section="" 1.770="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.770="" express="" withdrawal="" of="" application="" for="" extension="" of="" patent="" term.="" an="" application="" for="" extension="" of="" patent="" term="" may="" be="" expressly="" withdrawn="" before="" a="" determination="" is="" made="" pursuant="" to="" sec.="" 1.750="" by="" filing="" in="" the="" office,="" in="" duplicate,="" a="" written="" declaration="" of="" withdrawal="" signed="" by="" the="" owner="" of="" record="" of="" the="" patent="" or="" its="" agent.="" an="" application="" may="" not="" be="" expressly="" withdrawn="" after="" the="" date="" permitted="" for="">reply< [response]="" to="" the="" final="" determination="" on="" the="" application.="" an="" express="" withdrawal="" pursuant="" to="" this="" section="" is="" effective="" when="" acknowledged="" in="" writing="" by="" the="" office.="" the="" filing="" of="" an="" express="" withdrawal="" pursuant="" to="" this="" section="" and="" its="" acceptance="" by="" the="" office="" does="" not="" entitle="" applicant="" to="" a="" refund="" of="" the="" filing="" fee="" sec.="" 1.20(j))="" or="" any="" portion="" thereof.="" 106.="" section="" 1.785="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (d)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.785="" multiple="" applications="" for="" extension="" of="" term="" of="" the="" same="" patent="" or="" different="" patents="" for="" the="" same="" regulatory="" review="" period="" for="" a="" product.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (d)="" an="" application="" for="" extension="" shall="" be="" considered="" complete="" and="" formal="" regardless="" of="" whether="" it="" contains="" the="" identification="" of="" the="" holder="" of="" the="" regulatory="" approval="" granted="" with="" respect="" to="" the="" regulatory="" review="" period="" or="" express="" and="" exclusive="" authorization="" from="" the="" holder="" of="" the="" regulatory="" [[page="" 49864]]="" approval="" to="" rely="" on="" the="" regulatory="" review="" period="" for="" extension.="" when="" an="" application="" contains="" such="" information,="" or="" is="" amended="" to="" contain="" such="" information,="" it="" will="" be="" considered="" in="" determining="" whether="" an="" application="" is="" eligible="" for="" an="" extension="" under="" this="" section.="" a="" request="" may="" be="" made="" of="" any="" applicant="" to="" supply="" such="" information="" within="" a="" non-="" extendable="" period="" of="" not="" less="" than="" one="" [(1)]="" month="" whenever="" multiple="" applications="" for="" extension="" of="" more="" than="" one="" patent="" are="" received="" and="" rely="" upon="" the="" same="" regulatory="" review="" period.="" failure="" to="" provide="" such="" information="" within="" the="" period="" for="">reply< [response]="" set="" shall="" be="" regarded="" as="" conclusively="" establishing="" that="" the="" applicant="" is="" not="" the="" holder="" of="" the="" regulatory="" approval="" and="" is="" not="" expressly="" and="" exclusively="" authorized="" by="" the="" holder="" of="" the="" regulatory="" approval="" to="" seek="" the="" extension="" being="" sought.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 107.="" section="" 1.804="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (b)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.804="" time="" of="" making="" an="" original="" deposit.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (b)="" when="" the="" original="" deposit="" is="" made="" after="" the="" effective="" filing="" date="" of="" an="" application="" for="" patent,="" the="" applicant="" shall="" promptly="" submit="" a="" [verified]="" statement="" from="" a="" person="" in="" a="" position="" to="" corroborate="" the="" fact,="" [and="" shall="" state]="">stating<, that="" the="" biological="" material="" which="" is="" deposited="" is="" a="" biological="" material="" specifically="" identified="" in="" the="" application="" as="" filed[,="" except="" if="" the="" person="" is="" an="" attorney="" or="" agent="" registered="" to="" practice="" before="" the="" office,="" in="" which="" case="" the="" statement="" need="" not="" be="" verified].="" 108.="" section="" 1.805="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (c)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 1.805="" replacement="" or="" supplement="" of="" deposit.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (c)="" a="" request="" for="" a="" certificate="" of="" correction="" under="" this="" section="" shall="" not="" be="" granted="" unless="" the="" request="" is="" made="" promptly="" after="" the="" replacement="" or="" supplemental="" deposit="" has="" been="" made="" and:="" (1)="" includes="" a="" [verified]="" statement="" of="" the="" reason="" for="" making="" the="" replacement="" or="" supplemental="" deposit;="" (2)="" includes="" a="" [verified]="" statement="" from="" a="" person="" in="" a="" position="" to="" corroborate="" the="" fact,="" and="" [shall="" state]="">stating<, that="" the="" replacement="" or="" supplemental="" deposit="" is="" of="" a="" biological="" material="" which="" is="" identical="" to="" that="" originally="" deposited;="" (3)="" includes="" a="" [verified]="" showing="" that="" the="" patent="" owner="" acted="" diligently[-]="">:< (i)="" in="" the="" case="" of="" a="" replacement="" deposit,="" in="" making="" the="" deposit="" after="" receiving="" notice="" that="" samples="" could="" no="" longer="" be="" furnished="" from="" an="" earlier="" deposit,="" or="" (ii)="" in="" the="" case="" of="" a="" supplemental="" deposit,="" in="" making="" the="" deposit="" after="" receiving="" notice="" that="" the="" earlier="" deposit="" had="" become="" contaminated="" or="" had="" lost="" its="" capability="" to="" function="" as="" described="" in="" the="" specification;="" (4)="" includes="" a="" [verified]="" statement="" that="" the="" term="" of="" the="" replacement="" or="" supplemental="" deposit="" expires="" no="" earlier="" than="" the="" term="" of="" the="" deposit="" being="" replaced="" or="" supplemented;="" and="" (5)="" otherwise="" establishes="" compliance="" with="" these="" regulations[,="" except="" that="" if="" the="" person="" making="" one="" or="" more="" of="" the="" required="" statements="" or="" showing="" is="" an="" attorney="" or="" agent="" registered="" to="" practice="" before="" the="" office,="" that="" statement="" or="" showing="" need="" not="" be="" verified].="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" part="" 3--assignment,="" recording,="" and="" rights="" of="" assignee="" the="" authority="" citation="" for="" part="" 3="" continues="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" authority:="" 15="" u.s.c.="" 1123;="" 35="" u.s.c.="" 6.="" 109a.="" section="" 3.11="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 3.11="" documents="" which="" will="" be="" recorded.="">(a)< assignments="" of="" applications,="" patents,="" and="" registrations,="" accompanied="" by="" completed="" cover="" sheets="" as="" specified="" in="" secs.="" 3.28="" and="" 3.31,="" will="" be="" recorded="" in="" the="" office.="" other="" documents,="" accompanied="" by="" completed="" cover="" sheets="" as="" specified="" in="" secs.="" 3.28="" and="" 3.31,="" affecting="" title="" to="" applications,="" patents,="" or="" registrations,="" will="" be="" recorded="" as="" provided="" in="" this="" part="" or="" at="" the="" discretion="" of="" the="" commissioner.="">(b) Executive Order 9424 (3 CFR 1943--1948 Comp.) requires the 
    several departments and other executive agencies of the Government, 
    including Government-owned or Government-controlled corporations, to 
    forward promptly to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for 
    recording all licenses, assignments, or other interests of the 
    Government in or under patents or patent applications. Assignments and 
    other documents affecting title to patents or patent applications and 
    documents not affecting title to patents or patent applications 
    required by Executive order 9424 (3 CFR 1943--1948 Comp.) to be filed 
    will be recorded as provided in this Part.< 110.="" section="" 3.26="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 3.26="" english="" language="" requirement.="" the="" office="" will="" accept="" and="" record="" non-english="" language="" documents="" only="" if="" accompanied="" by="" [a="" verified]="">an< english="" translation="" signed="" by="" the="" individual="" making="" the="" translation.="" 110a.="" section="" 3.27="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 3.27="" mailing="" address="" for="" submitting="" documents="" to="" be="" recorded.="">(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, 
    documents< [documents]="" and="" cover="" sheets="" to="" be="" recorded="" should="" be="" addressed="" to="" the="" commissioner="" of="" patents="" and="" trademarks,="" box="" assignments,="" washington,="" dc="" 20231,="" unless="" they="" are="" filed="" together="" with="" new="" applications="" or="" with="" a="" petition="" under="" sec.="" 3.81(b).="">(b) A document required by Executive Order 9424 (3 CFR 1943--1948 
    Comp.) to be filed which does not affect title and is so identified in 
    the cover sheet (see Sec. 3.31(c)(2)) must be addressed and mailed to 
    the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Box Government Interest, 
    Washington, DC 20231.< 111.="" section="" 3.31="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" adding="" paragraph="" (c)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 3.31="" cover="" sheet="" content.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="">(c) Each patent cover sheet required by Sec. 3.28 seeking to 
    record a governmental interest as provided by Sec. 3.11(b) must:
        (1) Indicate that the document is to be recorded on the 
    governmental register, and, if applicable, that the document is to be 
    recorded on the Secret Register (see Sec. 3.58), and
        (2) Indicate, if applicable, that the document to be recorded is 
    not a document affecting title (see Sec. 3.41(b)).< 112.="" section="" 3.41="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 3.41="" recording="" fees.="">(a)< all="" requests="" to="" record="" documents="" must="" be="" accompanied="" by="" the="" appropriate="" fee.="">Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, 
    a< [a]="" fee="" is="" required="" for="" each="" application,="" patent="" and="" registration="" against="" which="" the="" document="" is="" recorded="" as="" identified="" in="" the="" cover="" sheet.="" the="" recording="" fee="" is="" set="" in="" sec.="" 1.21(h)="" of="" this="" [chapter]="">chapter< for="" patents="" and="" in="" sec.="" 2.6(q)="" of="" this="" [chapter]="">chapter< for="" trademarks.="">(b) No fee is required for each patent application and patent 
    against which a document required by Executive Order 9424 (3 CFR 1943-
    1948 Comp.) is to be filed if:
        (1) The document does not affect title and is so identified in the 
    cover sheet (see Sec. 3.31(c)(2));
    
    [[Page 49865]]
    
        (2) The cover sheet is filed in a format approved by the Office; 
    and
        (3) The document and cover sheet are mailed to the Office in 
    compliance with Sec. 3.27(b).< 113.="" section="" 3.51="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 3.51="" recording="" date.="" the="" date="" of="" recording="" of="" a="" document="" is="" the="" date="" the="" document="" meeting="" the="" requirements="" for="" recording="" set="" forth="" in="" this="" [part]="">part< is="" filed="" in="" the="" office.="" a="" document="" which="" does="" not="" comply="" with="" the="" identification="" requirements="" of="" 3.21="" will="" not="" be="" recorded.="" documents="" not="" meeting="" the="" other="" requirements="" for="" recording,="" for="" example,="" a="" document="" submitted="" without="" a="" completed="" cover="" sheet="" or="" without="" the="" required="" fee,="" will="" be="" returned="" for="" correction="" to="" the="" sender="" where="" a="" correspondence="" address="" is="" available.="" the="" returned="" papers,="" stamped="" with="" the="" original="" date="" of="" receipt="" by="" the="" office,="" will="" be="" accompanied="" by="" a="" letter="" which="" will="" indicate="" that="" if="" the="" returned="" papers="" are="" corrected="" and="" resubmitted="" to="" the="" office="" within="" the="" time="" specified="" in="" the="" letter,="" the="" office="" will="" consider="" the="" original="" date="" of="" filing="" of="" the="" papers="" as="" the="" date="" of="" recording="" of="" the="" document.="" the="" [certification]="" procedure="" under="" either="" sec.="" 1.8="" or="" sec.="" 1.10="" of="" this="" [chapter]="">chapter< may="" be="" used="" for="" resubmissions="" of="" returned="" papers="" to="" have="" the="" benefit="" of="" the="" date="" of="" deposit="" in="" the="" united="" states="" postal="" service.="" if="" the="" returned="" papers="" are="" not="" corrected="" and="" resubmitted="" within="" the="" specified="" period,="" the="" date="" of="" filing="" of="" the="" corrected="" papers="" will="" be="" considered="" to="" be="" the="" date="" of="" recording="" of="" the="" document.="" the="" specified="" period="" to="" resubmit="" the="" returned="" papers="" will="" not="" be="" extended.="" 114.="" section="" 3.58="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" added="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 3.58="" governmental="" registers.="" (a)="" the="" office="" will="" maintain="" a="" departmental="" register="" to="" record="" governmental="" interests="" required="" to="" be="" recorded="" by="" executive="" order="" 9424="" (3="" cfr="" 1943-1948="" comp.).="" this="" departmental="" register="" will="" not="" be="" open="" to="" public="" inspection="" but="" will="" be="" available="" for="" examination="" and="" inspection="" by="" duly="" authorized="" representatives="" of="" the="" government.="" governmental="" interests="" recorded="" on="" the="" departmental="" register="" will="" be="" available="" for="" public="" inspection="" as="" provided="" in="" sec.="" 1.12.="" (b)="" the="" office="" will="" maintain="" a="" secret="" register="" to="" record="" governmental="" interests="" required="" to="" be="" recorded="" by="" executive="" order="" 9424="" (3="" cfr="" 1943-1948="" comp.).="" any="" instrument="" to="" be="" recorded="" will="" be="" placed="" on="" this="" secret="" register="" at="" the="" request="" of="" the="" department="" or="" agency="" submitting="" the="" same.="" no="" information="" will="" be="" given="" concerning="" any="" instrument="" in="" such="" record="" or="" register,="" and="" no="" examination="" or="" inspection="" thereof="" or="" of="" the="" index="" thereto="" will="" be="" permitted,="" except="" on="" the="" written="" authority="" of="" the="" head="" of="" the="" department="" or="" agency="" which="" submitted="" the="" instrument="" and="" requested="" secrecy,="" and="" the="" approval="" of="" such="" authority="" by="" the="" commissioner="" of="" patents="" and="" trademarks.="" no="" instrument="" or="" record="" other="" than="" the="" one="" specified="" may="" be="" examined,="" and="" the="" examination="" must="" take="" place="" in="" the="" presence="" of="" a="" designated="" official="" of="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office.="" when="" the="" department="" or="" agency="" which="" submitted="" an="" instrument="" no="" longer="" requires="" secrecy="" with="" respect="" to="" that="" instrument,="" it="" must="" be="" recorded="" anew="" in="" the="" departmental="">< 115.="" section="" 3.73="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (b)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 3.73="" establishing="" right="" of="" assignee="" to="" prosecute.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (b)="" when="" the="" assignee="" of="" the="" entire="" right,="" title="" and="" interest="" seeks="" to="" take="" action="" in="" a="" matter="" before="" the="" office="" with="" respect="" to="" a="" patent="" application,="" trademark="" application,="" patent="" registration,="" or="" reexamination="" proceeding,="" the="" assignee="" must="" establish="" its="" ownership="" of="" the="" property="" to="" the="" satisfaction="" of="" the="" commissioner.="" ownership="" is="" established="" by="" submitting="" to="" the="" office="" documentary="" evidence="" of="" a="" chain="" of="" title="" from="" the="" original="" owner="" to="" the="" assignee="">(e.g., copy of an 
    executed assignment submitted for recording, etc.)< or="" by="" specifying="" (e.g.,="" reel="" and="" frame="" number,="" etc.)="" where="" such="" evidence="" is="" recorded="" in="" the="" office.="" documents="" submitted="" to="" establish="" ownership="" may="" be="" required="" to="" be="" recorded="" as="" a="" condition="" to="" permitting="" the="" assignee="" to="" take="" action="" in="" a="" matter="" pending="" before="" the="" office.="" [in="" addition,="" the="" assignee="" of="" a="" patent="" application="" or="" patent="" must="" submit="" a="" statement="" specifying="" that="" the="" evidentiary="" documents="" have="" been="" reviewed="" and="" certifying="" that,="" to="" the="" best="" of="" assignee's="" knowledge="" and="" belief,="" title="" is="" in="" the="" assignee="" seeking="" to="" take="" the="" action.]="" part="" 5--secrecy="" of="" certain="" inventions="" and="" licenses="" to="" export="" and="" file="" applications="" in="" foreign="" countries="" 116.="" the="" authority="" citation="" for="" part="" 5="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" authority:="" 35="" u.s.c.="" 6,="" 41,="" 181-188;="" 22="" u.s.c.="" 2751="" et="" seq.;="" 22="" u.s.c.="" 3201="" et="" seq.;="" 42="" u.s.c.="" 2011="" et="" seq..="" 117.="" section="" 5.1="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 5.1="" [defense="" inspection="" of="" certain="" applications]="">Correspondence<. [(a)="" the="" provisions="" of="" this="" part="" shall="" apply="" to="" both="" national="" and="" international="" applications="" filed="" in="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office="" and,="" with="" respect="" to="" inventions="" made="" in="" the="" united="" states,="" to="" applications="" filed="" in="" any="" foreign="" country="" or="" any="" international="" authority="" other="" than="" the="" united="" states="" receiving="" office.="" the="" (1)="" filing="" of="" a="" national="" or="" an="" international="" application="" in="" a="" foreign="" country="" or="" with="" an="" international="" authority="" other="" than="" the="" united="" states="" receiving="" office,="" or="" (2)="" transmittal="" of="" an="" international="" application="" to="" a="" foreign="" agency="" or="" an="" international="" authority="" other="" than="" the="" united="" states="" receiving="" office="" is="" considered="" to="" be="" a="" foreign="" filing="" within="" the="" meaning="" of="" chapter="" 17="" of="" title="" 35,="" united="" states="" code.="" (b)="" in="" accordance="" with="" the="" provisions="" of="" 35="" u.s.c.="" 181,="" patent="" applications="" containing="" subject="" matter="" the="" disclosure="" of="" which="" might="" be="" detrimental="" to="" the="" national="" security="" are="" made="" available="" for="" inspection="" by="" defense="" agencies="" as="" specified="" in="" said="" section.="" only="" applications="" obviously="" relating="" to="" national="" security,="" and="" applications="" within="" fields="" indicated="" to="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office="" by="" the="" defense="" agencies="" as="" so="" related,="" are="" made="" available.="" the="" inspection="" will="" be="" made="" only="" by="" responsible="" representatives="" authorized="" by="" the="" agency="" to="" review="" applications.="" such="" representatives="" are="" required="" to="" sign="" a="" dated="" acknowledgment="" of="" access="" accepting="" the="" condition="" that="" information="" obtained="" from="" the="" inspection="" will="" be="" used="" for="" no="" purpose="" other="" than="" the="" administration="" of="" 35="" u.s.c.="" 181-188.="" copies="" of="" applications="" may="" be="" made="" available="" to="" such="" representatives="" for="" inspection="" outside="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office="" under="" conditions="" assuring="" that="" the="" confidentiality="" of="" the="" applications="" will="" be="" maintained,="" including="" the="" conditions="" that:="" (1)="" all="" copies="" will="" be="" returned="" to="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office="" promptly="" if="" no="" secrecy="" order="" is="" imposed,="" or="" upon="" rescission="" of="" such="" order="" if="" one="" is="" imposed,="" and="" (2)="" no="" additional="" copies="" will="" be="" made="" by="" the="" defense="" agencies.="" a="" record="" of="" the="" removal="" and="" return="" of="" copies="" made="" available="" for="" defense="" inspection="" will="" be="" maintained="" by="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office.="" applications="" relating="" to="" atomic="" energy="" are="" made="" available="" to="" the="" department="" of="" energy="" as="" specified="" in="" 1.14="" of="" this="" chapter.]=""> All correspondence in connection with this part, including 
    petitions, must
    
    [[Page 49866]]
    
    be addressed to ``Assistant Commissioner for Patents (Attention 
    Licensing and Review), Washington, DC 20231.''< 118.="" section="" 5.2="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (b)="" and="" removing="" paragraphs="" (c)="" and="" (d)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 5.2="" secrecy="" order.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (b)="" [the="" secrecy="" order="" is="" directed="" to="" the="" applicant,="" his="" successors,="" any="" and="" all="" assignees,="" and="" their="" legal="" representatives;="" hereinafter="" designated="" as="" principals.]="">Any request for compensation as 
    provided in 35 U.S.C. 183 must not be made to the Patent and Trademark 
    Office, but directly to the department or agency which caused the 
    secrecy order to be issued.< [(c)="" a="" copy="" of="" the="" secrecy="" order="" will="" be="" forwarded="" to="" each="" principal="" of="" record="" in="" the="" application="" and="" will="" be="" accompanied="" by="" a="" receipt,="" identifying="" the="" particular="" principal,="" to="" be="" signed="" and="" returned.="" (d)="" the="" secrecy="" order="" is="" directed="" to="" the="" subject="" matter="" of="" the="" application.="" where="" any="" other="" application="" in="" which="" a="" secrecy="" order="" has="" not="" been="" issued="" discloses="" a="" significant="" part="" of="" the="" subject="" matter="" of="" the="" application="" under="" secrecy="" order,="" the="" other="" application="" and="" the="" common="" subject="" matter="" should="" be="" called="" to="" the="" attention="" of="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office.="" such="" a="" notice="" may="" include="" any="" material="" such="" as="" would="" be="" urged="" in="" a="" petition="" to="" rescind="" secrecy="" orders="" on="" either="" of="" the="" applications.]="" 119.="" section="" 5.3="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (c)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 5.3="" prosecution="" of="" application="" under="" secrecy="" orders;="" withholding="" patent.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (c)="" when="" the="" national="" application="" is="" found="" to="" be="" in="" condition="" for="" allowance="" except="" for="" the="" secrecy="" order="" the="" applicant="" and="" the="" agency="" which="" caused="" the="" secrecy="" order="" to="" be="" issued="" will="" be="" notified.="" this="" notice="" (which="" is="" not="" a="" notice="" of="" allowance="" under="" sec.="" 1.311="" of="" this="" chapter)="" does="" not="" require="">reply< [response]="" by="" the="" applicant="" and="" places="" the="" national="" application="" in="" a="" condition="" of="" suspension="" until="" the="" secrecy="" order="" is="" removed.="" when="" the="" secrecy="" order="" is="" removed="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office="" will="" issue="" a="" notice="" of="" allowance="" under="" sec.="" 1.311="" of="" this="" chapter,="" or="" take="" such="" other="" action="" as="" may="" then="" be="" warranted.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 120.="" section="" 5.4="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraphs="" (a)="" and="" (d)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 5.4="" petition="" for="" rescission="" of="" secrecy="" order.="" (a)="" a="" petition="" for="" rescission="" or="" removal="" of="" a="" secrecy="" order="" may="" be="" filed="" by,="" or="" on="" behalf="" of,="" any="" principal="" affected="" thereby.="" such="" petition="" may="" be="" in="" letter="" form,="" and="" it="" must="" be="" in="" duplicate.="" [the="" petition="" must="" be="" accompanied="" by="" one="" copy="" of="" the="" application="" or="" an="" order="" for="" the="" same,="" unless="" a="" showing="" is="" made="" that="" such="" a="" copy="" has="" already="" been="" furnished="" to="" the="" department="" or="" agency="" which="" caused="" the="" secrecy="" order="" to="" be="" issued.]="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (d)="" [unless="" based="" upon="" facts="" of="" public="" record,="" the="" petition="" must="" be="" verified.]=""> Appeal to the Secretary of Commerce, as provided by 35 
    U.S.C. 181, from a secrecy order cannot be taken until after a petition 
    for rescission of the secrecy order has been made and denied.< 121.="" section="" 5.5="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraphs="" (b)="" and="" (e)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 5.5="" permit="" to="" disclose="" or="" modification="" of="" secrecy="" order.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (b)="" petitions="" for="" a="" permit="" or="" modification="" must="" fully="" recite="" the="" reason="" or="" purpose="" for="" the="" proposed="" disclosure.="" where="" any="" proposed="" disclosee="" is="" known="" to="" be="" cleared="" by="" a="" defense="" agency="" to="" receive="" classified="" information,="" adequate="" explanation="" of="" such="" clearance="" should="" be="" made="" in="" the="" petition="" including="" the="" name="" of="" the="" agency="" or="" department="" granting="" the="" clearance="" and="" the="" date="" and="" degree="" thereof.="" the="" petition="" must="" be="" filed="" in="" duplicate="" [and="" be="" accompanied="" by="" one="" copy="" of="" the="" application="" or="" an="" order="" for="" the="" same,="" unless="" a="" showing="" is="" made="" that="" such="" a="" copy="" has="" already="" been="" furnished="" to="" the="" department="" or="" agency="" which="" caused="" the="" secrecy="" order="" to="" be="" issued].="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (e)="" [the="" permit="" or="" modification="" may="" contain="" conditions="" and="" limitations.]="">Organizations requiring consent for disclosure of 
    applications under secrecy order to persons or organizations in 
    connection with repeated routine operation may petition for such 
    consent in the form of a general permit. To be successful such 
    petitions must ordinarily recite the security clearance status of the 
    disclosees as sufficient for the highest classification of material 
    that may be involved.< sec.="" 5.6="" [removed="" and="" reserved]="" 122.="" section="" 5.6="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed="" and="" reserved.="" sec.="" 5.7="" [removed="" and="" reserved]="" 123.="" section="" 5.7="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed="" and="" reserved.="" sec.="" 5.8="" [removed="" and="" reserved]="" 124.="" section="" 5.8="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed="" and="" reserved.="" 125.="" section="" 5.11="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraphs="" (b)="" and="" (c)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 5.11="" license="" for="" filing="" in="" a="" foreign="" country="" an="" application="" on="" an="" invention="" made="" in="" the="" united="" states="" or="" for="" transmitting="" international="" application.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (b)="" the="" license="" from="" the="" commissioner="" of="" patents="" and="" trademarks="" referred="" to="" in="" paragraph="" (a)="" of="" this="" section="" would="" also="" authorize="" the="" export="" of="" technical="" data="" abroad="" for="" purposes="" relating="" to="" the="" preparation,="" filing="" or="" possible="" filing="" and="" prosecution="" of="" a="" foreign="" patent="" application="" without="" separately="" complying="" with="" the="" regulations="" contained="" in="" 22="" cfr="" parts="" [121]="">120< through="" 130="" (international="" traffic="" in="" arms="" regulations="" of="" the="" department="" of="" state),="" 15="" cfr="" [part="" 379="" (regulations="" of="" the="" bureau="" of="" export="" administration,="" department="" of="" commerce)]="">Parts 768-799 (Export Administration Regulations of the 
    Department of Commerce)< and="" 10="" cfr="" part="" 810="" [(foreign="" atomic="" energy="" programs="" of="" the="" department="" of="" energy)]="">(Assistance to Foreign Atomic 
    Energy Activities--Regulations of the Department of Energy)<. (c)="" where="" technical="" data="" in="" the="" form="" of="" a="" patent="" application,="" or="" in="" any="" form,="" is="" being="" exported="" for="" purposes="" related="" to="" the="" preparation,="" filing="" or="" possible="" filing="" and="" prosecution="" of="" a="" foreign="" patent="" application,="" without="" the="" license="" from="" the="" commissioner="" of="" patents="" and="" trademarks="" referred="" to="" in="" paragraphs="" (a)="" or="" (b)="" of="" this="" section,="" or="" on="" an="" invention="" not="" made="" in="" the="" united="" states,="" the="" export="" regulations="" contained="" in="" 22="" cfr="" parts="" [121]="">120< through="" 130="" (international="" traffic="" in="" arms="" regulations="" of="" the="" department="" of="" state),="" 15="" cfr="" [part="" 379="" (regulations="" of="" the="" bureau="" of="" export="" administration,="" department="" of="" commerce)]="">Parts 768-799 (Export Administration Regulations of the 
    Department of Commerce)< and="" 10="" cfr="" part="" 810="" [(foreign="" atomic="" energy="" programs="" of="" the="" department="" of="" energy)]="">(Assistance to Foreign Atomic 
    Energy Activities--Regulations of the Department of Energy)< must="" be="" complied="" with="" unless="" a="" license="" is="" not="" required="" because="" a="" united="" states="" application="" was="" on="" file="" at="" the="" time="" of="" export="" for="" at="" least="" six="" months="" without="" a="" secrecy="" order="" under="" sec.="" 5.2="" being="" placed="" thereon.="" the="" term="" ``exported''="" means="" export="" as="" it="" is="" defined="" in="" 22="" cfr="" [parts="" 121="" through="" 130]="">Part 120<, 15="" cfr="" [[page="" 49867]]="" part="" [379]="">779< and="">activities covered by< 10="" cfr="" part="" 810.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 126.="" section="" 5.13="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 5.13="" petition="" for="" license;="" no="" corresponding="" application.="" if="" no="" corresponding="" national="" or="" international="" application="" has="" been="" filed="" in="" the="" united="" states,="" the="" petition="" for="" license="" under="" sec.="" 5.12(b)="" must="" be="" accompanied="" by="" the="" required="" fee="" (sec.="" 1.17(h)),="" if="" expedited="" handling="" of="" the="" petition="" is="" also="" sought,="" and="" a="" legible="" copy="" of="" the="" material="" upon="" which="" a="" license="" is="" desired.="" this="" copy="" will="" be="" retained="" as="" a="" measure="" of="" the="" license="" granted.="" [for="" assistance="" in="" the="" identification="" of="" the="" subject="" matter="" of="" each="" license="" so="" issued,="" it="" is="" suggested="" that="" the="" petition="" be="" submitted="" in="" duplicate="" and="" provide="" a="" title="" and="" other="" description="" of="" the="" material.="" the="" duplicate="" copy="" of="" the="" petition="" will="" be="" returned="" with="" the="" license="" or="" other="" action="" on="" the="" petition.]="" 127.="" section="" 5.14="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (a)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 5.14="" petition="" for="" license;="" corresponding="" u.s.="" application.="" (a)="" when="" there="" is="" a="" corresponding="" united="" states="" application="" on="" file,="" a="" petition="" for="" license="" under="" sec.="" 5.12(b)="" must="" include="" the="" required="" fee="" (sec.="" 1.17(h)),="" if="" expedited="" handling="" of="" the="" petition="" is="" also="" sought,="" and="" must="" identify="" this="" application="" by="" [serial]="">application< number,="" filing="" date,="" inventor,="" and="" title,="" but="" a="" copy="" of="" the="" material="" upon="" which="" the="" license="" is="" desired="" is="" not="" required.="" the="" subject="" matter="" licensed="" will="" be="" measured="" by="" the="" disclosure="" of="" the="" united="" states="" application.="" [where="" the="" title="" is="" not="" descriptive,="" and="" the="" subject="" matter="" is="" clearly="" of="" no="" interest="" from="" a="" security="" standpoint,="" time="" may="" be="" saved="" by="" a="" short="" statement="" in="" the="" petition="" as="" to="" the="" nature="" of="" the="" invention.]="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" 128.="" section="" 5.15="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" by="" revising="" paragraph="" (a)="" to="" read="" as="" follows.="" sec.="" 5.15="" scope="" of="" license.="" (a)="" applications="" or="" other="" materials="" reviewed="" pursuant="" to="" secs.="" 5.12="" through="" 5.14,="" which="" were="" not="" required="" to="" be="" made="" available="" for="" inspection="" by="" defense="" agencies="" under="" 35="" u.s.c.="" 181="" and="" sec.="" 5.1,="" will="" be="" eligible="" for="" a="" license="" of="" the="" scope="" provided="" in="" this="" paragraph.="" this="" license="" permits="" subsequent="" modifications,="" amendments,="" and="" supplements="" containing="" additional="" subject="" matter="" to,="" or="" divisions="" of,="" a="" foreign="" patent="" application,="" if="" such="" changes="" to="" the="" application="" do="" not="" alter="" the="" general="" nature="" of="" the="" invention="" in="" a="" manner="" which="" would="" require="" the="" united="" states="" application="" to="" have="" been="" made="" available="" for="" inspection="" under="" 35="" u.s.c.="" 181="" and="" sec.="" 5.1.="" [this="" license="" also="" covers="" the="" inventions="" disclosed="" in="" foreign="" applications="" which="" have="" been="" granted="" a="" license="" under="" this="" part="" prior="" to="" april="" 4,="" 1984,="" and="" which="" were="" not="" subject="" to="" security="" inspection="" under="" 35="" u.s.c.="" 181="" and="" sec.="" 5.1.]="" grant="" of="" this="" license="" authorizing="" the="" export="" and="" filing="" of="" an="" application="" in="" a="" foreign="" country="" or="" the="" transmitting="" of="" an="" international="" application="" to="" any="" foreign="" patent="" agency="" when="" the="" subject="" matter="" of="" the="" foreign="" or="" international="" application="" corresponds="" to="" that="" of="" the="" domestic="" application.="" this="" license="" includes="" authority:="" (1)="" to="" export="" and="" file="" all="" duplicate="" and="" formal="" application="" papers="" in="" foreign="" countries="" or="" with="" international="" agencies;="" (2)="" to="" make="" amendments,="" modifications,="" and="" supplements,="" including="" divisions,="" changes="" or="" supporting="" matter="" consisting="" of="" the="" illustration,="" exemplification,="" comparison,="" or="" explanation="" of="" subject="" matter="" disclosed="" in="" the="" application;="" and="" (3)="" to="" take="" any="" action="" in="" the="" prosecution="" of="" the="" foreign="" or="" international="" application="" provided="" that="" the="" adding="" of="" subject="" matter="" of="" taking="" of="" any="" action="" under="" paragraphs="" (a)(1)="" or="" (2)="" of="" this="" section="" does="" not="" change="" the="" general="" nature="" of="" the="" invention="" disclosed="" in="" the="" application="" in="" a="" manner="" which="" would="" require="" such="" application="" to="" have="" been="" made="" available="" for="" inspection="" under="" 35="" u.s.c.="" 181="" and="" sec.="" 5.1="" by="" including="" technical="" data="" pertaining="" to:="" (i)="" defense="" services="" or="" articles="" designated="" in="" the="" united="" states="" munitions="" list="" applicable="" at="" the="" time="" of="" foreign="" filing,="" the="" unlicensed="" exportation="" of="" which="" is="" prohibited="" pursuant="" to="" the="" arms="" export="" control="" act,="" as="" amended="" and="" 22="" cfr="" parts="" [121]="">120< through="" 130;="" or="" (ii)="" restricted="" data,="" sensitive="" nuclear="" technology="" or="" technology="" useful="" for="" the="" production="" or="" utilization="" of="" special="" nuclear="" material="" or="" atomic="" energy,="" dissemination="" of="" which="" is="" subject="" to="" restrictions="" of="" the="" atomic="" energy="" act="" of="" 1954,="" as="" amended,="" and="" the="" nuclear="" non-="" proliferation="" act="" of="" 1978,="" as="" implemented="" by="" the="" regulations="" [for="" unclassified="" activities="" in="" assistance="" to="" foreign="" atomic="" energy="" activities]="">of the Department of Energy for assistance to foreign 
    energy activities<, 10="" cfr="" part="" 810,="" in="" effect="" at="" the="" time="" of="" foreign="" filing.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" sec.="" 5.16="" [removed="" and="" reserved]="" 129.="" section="" 5.16="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed="" and="" reserved.="" sec.="" 5.17="" [removed="" and="" reserved]="" 130.="" section="" 5.17="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" and="" removed.="" 131.="" section="" 5.18="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 5.18="" arms,="" ammunition,="" and="" implements="" of="" war.="" (a)="" the="" exportation="" of="" technical="" data="" relating="" to="" arms,="" ammunition,="" and="" implements="" of="" war="" generally="" is="" subject="" to="" the="" international="" traffic="" in="" arms="" regulations="" of="" the="" department="" of="" state="" (22="" cfr="" parts="" [121]="">120< through="" [128]="">130<); the="" articles="" designated="" as="" arms,="" ammunition,="" and="" implements="" of="" war="" are="" enumerated="" in="" the="" u.s.="" munitions="" list,="" 22="" cfr="" [121.01]="">Part 121<. however,="" if="" a="" patent="" applicant="" complies="" with="" regulations="" issued="" by="" the="" commissioner="" of="" patents="" and="" trademarks="" under="" 35="" u.s.c.="" 184,="" no="" separate="" approval="" from="" the="" department="" of="" state="" is="" required="" unless="" the="" applicant="" seeks="" to="" export="" technical="" data="" exceeding="" that="" used="" to="" support="" a="" patent="" application="" in="" a="" foreign="" country.="" this="" exemption="" from="" department="" of="" state="" regulations="" is="" applicable="" regardless="" of="" whether="" a="" license="" from="" the="" commissioner="" is="" required="" by="" the="" provisions="" of="" secs.="" 5.11="" and="" [5.15="" (22="" cfr="" 125.04(b),="" 125.20(b))]="">5.12 (22 CFR Part 125)<. (b)="" when="" a="" patent="" application="" containing="" subject="" matter="" on="" the="" munitions="" list="" (22="" cfr="" [121.01]="">Part 121<) is="" subject="" to="" a="" secrecy="" order="" under="" sec.="" 5.2="" and="" a="" petition="" is="" made="" under="" sec.="" 5.5="" for="" a="" modification="" of="" the="" secrecy="" order="" to="" permit="" filing="" abroad,="" a="" separate="" request="" to="" the="" department="" of="" state="" for="" authority="" to="" export="" classified="" information="" is="" not="" required="" (22="" cfr="" [125.05(d)]="">Part 125<). 132.="" section="" 5.19="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" revised="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 5.19="" export="" of="" technical="" data.="" (a)="" under="" regulations="" (15="" cfr="" 770.10(j))="" established="" by="" the="" [u.s.]="" department="" of="" commerce,="" [bureau="" of="" export="" administration,="" office="" of="" export="" licensing,]="" a="" [validated="" export]="" license="" is="" not="" required="" in="" any="" case="" to="" file="" a="" patent="" application="" or="" part="" thereof="" in="" a="" foreign="" country="" if="" the="" foreign="" filing="" is="" in="" accordance="" with="" the="" regulations="" (37="" cfr="" 5.11="" through="" 5.33)="" of="" the="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office.="" (b)="" [a="" validated]="">An< export="" license="" is="" not="" required="" for="" data="" contained="" in="" a="" patent="" application="" prepared="" wholly="" from="" foreign-origin="" technical="" data="" where="" such="" application="" is="" being="" sent="" to="" the="" foreign="" inventor="" to="" be="" executed="" and="" [[page="" 49868]]="" returned="" to="" the="" united="" states="" for="" subsequent="" filing="" in="" the="" u.s.="" patent="" and="" trademark="" office="" (15="" cfr="" 779a.3(e)).="" (c)="" [removed].="" 133.="" section="" 5.20,="" paragraph="" (b),="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed.="" sec.="" 5.20="" export="" of="" technical="" data="" relating="" to="" sensitive="" nuclear="" technology.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (b)="" [removed].="" 134.="" section="" 5.25,="" paragraph="" (c),="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed.="" sec.="" 5.25="" petition="" for="" retroactive="" license.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (c)="" [removed].="" sec.="" 5.31="" [removed="" and="" reserved]="" 135.="" section="" 5.31="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed="" and="" reserved.="" sec.="" 5.32="" [removed="" and="" reserved]="" 136.="" section="" 5.32="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed="" and="" reserved.="" sec.="" 5.33="" [removed="" and="" reserved]="" 137.="" section="" 5.33="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed="" and="" reserved.="" part="" 7--[removed="" and="" reserved]="" 138.="" part="" 7="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" removed="" and="" reserved.="" dated:="" september="" 10,="" 1996.="" bruce="" a.="" lehman,="" assistant="" secretary="" of="" commerce="" and="" commissioner="" of="" patents="" and="" trademarks.="" [fr="" doc.="" 96-23665="" filed="" 9-20-96;="" 8:45="" am]="" billing="" code="" 3510-16-p="">

Document Information

Published:
09/23/1996
Department:
Patent and Trademark Office
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Document Number:
96-23665
Dates:
Written comments must be received on or before November 22, 1996, to ensure consideration.
Pages:
49820-49868 (49 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 960606163-6163-01
RINs:
0651-AA80: Changes To Patent Practice and Procedure
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/0651-AA80/changes-to-patent-practice-and-procedure
PDF File:
96-23665.pdf
CFR: (177)
37 CFR 1.63.<
37 CFR 1.6(a))
37 CFR 1.81(a)
37 CFR 1.78(a)(3)
37 CFR 1.51(a)(1)
More ...