97-25209. Denial of Petition for Rulemaking; Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 184 (Tuesday, September 23, 1997)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 49663-49664]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-25209]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
    
    49 CFR Part 571
    
    
    Denial of Petition for Rulemaking; Federal Motor Vehicle Safety 
    Standards
    
    AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA); 
    Department of Transportation.
    
    ACTION: Denial of petition for rulemaking.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This notice denies the petition by John Chevedden for the 
    issuance of a mandatory Federal regulation that would require all new 
    cars to be manufactured with windshield edge coating in the space 
    between the center rear view mirror and the lowered sun visors. The 
    petitioner stated that this will prevent blinding glare from the sun in 
    the early morning and late afternoon. According to the petitioner the 
    targeted windshield coating is currently standard on the Hyundai 
    Accent. Based upon the information provided by the petitioner and other 
    information available to NHTSA, the agency has concluded that there is 
    insufficient evidence to support a mandatory Federal requirement that 
    all new cars be manufactured with a windshield shade band that is 
    identical to the shade band currently installed on the Hyundai Accent.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenneth O. Hardie, Safety Performance 
    Standards, NHTSA, 400 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC 20590. Mr. 
    Hardie's telephone number is (202) 366-6987.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By letter dated May 21, 1997, John Chevedden 
    of Redondo Beach, California, petitioned NHTSA to issue a new rule that 
    would require that all new cars be manufactured with windshield edge 
    coating in the space between the center rear view mirror and the 
    lowered sun visors. Mr. Chevedden's petition stated that the targeted 
    windshield coating is currently standard on the Hyundai Accent. Mr 
    Chevedden stated that this will prevent blinding sun glare and enhance 
    safety by reducing collisions in the early morning and late afternoon 
    sun.
        The specific area of the windshield that Mr. Chevedden's petition 
    addresses is called the ``glazing shade band,'' i.e., the area 
    immediately adjacent to and below the top edge of the vehicle glazing, 
    through which light transmission is less than that required for glazing 
    that are requisite for driving visibility, as defined in ANSI Z26.1. 
    ANSI Z26.1 is the American National Standard for Safety Glazing 
    Materials for Glazing Motor Vehicles Operating on Land Highways; Safety 
    Code. Examples of shade bands are:
        a. Laminated Safety Glass--A color band in the laminated product 
    formed by the application of a dye or pigment to the interlayer 
    material prior to lamination.
        b. Tempered Safety Glass--A pattern comprised of lines and spaces, 
    or dots and voids, printed into the glass surface from a durable opaque 
    or translucent material.
        Mr. Chevedden asked that all new cars be required to be 
    manufactured with a windshield edge coating (windshield shade band) 
    identical to that which is installed on the Hyundai Accent. Federal law 
    requires that the area of window requisite for driving visibility have 
    light transmittance of not less than 70%. Motor vehicle manufacturers 
    place a mark on the windshield designating the AS1 line. The windshield 
    below that line is ``requisite for driving visibility'' and must comply 
    with the 70% light transmittance requirement. Federal law does not 
    specify any minimum light transmittance for the windshield above the 
    AS1 line. Thus, manufacturers are free to install any shade band design 
    they choose above that line.
        In addition to the Federal limit that windshield shade bands can 
    only extend down to the AS1 mark, there are some States that have motor 
    vehicle regulations that prohibit the windshield shade band from 
    extending downward from the top edge of the vehicle by more than six 
    inches. Further, there is a voluntary standard for windshield shade 
    bands promulgated by the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE). This 
    SAE standard is SAE J100, Vehicle Glazing Shade Bands. Although the use 
    of the SAE Standards by anyone in the automotive industry is entirely 
    voluntary, SAE standards are widely used by the automotive industry. 
    All SAE Standards are submitted to the American National Standards 
    Institute for recognition as American National Standards.
        Mr. Chevedden petitioned to change the status quo and make the 
    Hyundai Accent shade band design mandatory for all new cars, light 
    trucks and sport utility vehicles. While NHTSA has carried out many 
    suggestions from concerned citizens regarding motor vehicle safety, to 
    change or impose a new Federal motor vehicle safety standard, NHTSA 
    must present information to the public demonstrating that there is a 
    safety problem with the current situation and that the proposed 
    solution will address the problem and improve safety in a cost 
    effective way. The petitioner provided no information to support his 
    contention that there is a safety problem with the current situation or 
    that his proposed solution will improve safety in a cost effective 
    manner. NHTSA has no information indicating that the Hyundai Accent 
    windshield shade band design is more effective than any other vehicle 
    that is equipped with a windshield shade band, nor does the agency 
    possess information regarding the efficacy of any shade band in 
    reducing motor vehicle-related deaths and injuries. Absent such 
    information, NHTSA has no basis for initiating a rulemaking proceeding.
        After carefully considering the petition, NHTSA concludes that 
    there is not a reasonable possibility that the order requested by the 
    petitioner would be issued at the conclusion of a rulemaking 
    proceeding. Accordingly, the petition is denied.
    
    
    [[Page 49664]]
    
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30103, 30111, 30162; delegations of 
    authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.
    
        Issued on: September 17, 1997.
    L. Robert Shelton,
    Associate Administrator for Safety Performance Standards.
    [FR Doc. 97-25209 Filed 9-22-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
09/23/1997
Department:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Denial of petition for rulemaking.
Document Number:
97-25209
Pages:
49663-49664 (2 pages)
PDF File:
97-25209.pdf
CFR: (1)
49 CFR 571