98-25436. Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon from Norway; Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty Administrative Review  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 184 (Wednesday, September 23, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 50880-50881]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-25436]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    
    International Trade Administration
    [A-403-801]
    
    
    Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon from Norway; Initiation and 
    Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty 
    Administrative Review
    
    AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
    Department of Commerce.
    
    ACTION: Notice of initiation and preliminary results of changed 
    circumstances antidumping duty administrative review.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce has received information sufficient 
    to warrant initiation of a changed circumstances administrative review 
    of the antidumping order on fresh and chilled Atlantic salmon from 
    Norway. Based on this information, we preliminarily determine that Kinn 
    Salmon AS is the successor-in-interest to Skaarfish Group AS for 
    purposes of determining antidumping liability.
        Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary 
    results.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: September 23, 1998.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Todd Peterson or Thomas Futtner, Office of AD/CVD Enforcement, Import 
    Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
    Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
    20230; telephone (202) 482-4195.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    The Applicable Statute and Regulations
    
        Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the statute are 
    references to the provisions effective January 1, 1995, the effective 
    date of the amendments made to the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act) by the 
    Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA). In addition, unless otherwise 
    indicated, all citations to the Department of Commerce's regulations 
    refer to the regulations, codified at 19 CFR part 351, April 1998.
    
    Background
    
        On April 12, 1991, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
    published in the Federal Register (56 FR 14920) an antidumping duty 
    order on fresh and chilled Atlantic salmon from Norway. On March 2, 
    1998, Kinn Salmon AS (Kinn) submitted a letter stating that Kinn is the 
    successor-in-interest to Skaarfish Group AS (Skaarfish), and that Kinn 
    should receive the same antidumping duty treatment as is accorded 
    Skaarfish.
    
    Scope of the Review
    
        The merchandise covered by this review is fresh and chilled 
    Atlantic salmon (salmon). It encompasses the species of Atlantic salmon 
    (Salmo salar) marketed as specified herein; the subject merchandise 
    excludes all other species of salmon: Danube salmon; Chinook (also 
    called ``king'' or ``quinnat''); Coho (``silver''); Sockeye 
    (``redfish'' or ``blueback''); Humpback (``pink''); and Chum (``dog''). 
    Atlantic salmon is whole or nearly whole fish, typically (but not 
    necessarily) marketed gutted, bled, and cleaned, with the head on. The 
    subject merchandise is typically packed in fresh water ice (chilled). 
    Excluded from the subject merchandise are fillets, steaks, and other 
    cuts of Atlantic salmon. Also excluded are frozen, canned, smoked or 
    otherwise processed Atlantic salmon. Fresh and chilled Atlantic salmon 
    is currently provided for under Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) 
    subheading 0302.12.00.02.09. The HTS item number is provided for 
    convenience and Customs purposes. The written description remains 
    dispositive.
    
    Initiation and Preliminary Results of Review
    
        In a letter dated March 2, 1998, Kinn advised the Department that 
    on July 1, 1997, the former Skaarfish reorganized to form two firms, 
    Skaarfish Pelagisk AS and Kinn Salmon AS. The salmon activities of 
    Skaarfish including processing, marketing and exporting were 
    transferred to Kinn Salmon AS. Skaarfish Pelagisk AS oversees the 
    processing, marketing and exporting activities of all other types of 
    fish. Kinn stated that its operations are a direct continuation of the 
    salmon related activities performed by Skaarfish. While the board of 
    directors has changed, the officers and management of Kinn are
    
    [[Page 50881]]
    
    virtually identical to the officers and management of Skaarfish. Kinn 
    stated that the address, telephone numbers and telefax numbers are the 
    same as those of Skaarfish. Furthermore, it operates the same 
    facilities in Floro, Norway that were operated by Skaarfish for the 
    processing of salmon and conducts business operations at the same 
    executive offices used by Skaarfish. It provided documentation showing 
    that the customer list for Kinn and the supplier list to Kinn is the 
    same as the customer and supplier lists for Skaarfish. Kinn submitted a 
    copy of The Certificates of Registration of Skaarfish, Skaarfish 
    Pelagisk AS, and Kinn Salmon AS.
        Thus, in accordance with section 751(b) of the Act, the Department 
    is initiating a changed circumstances review to determine whether Kinn 
    is the successor-in-interest to Skaarfish for purposes of determining 
    antidumping duty liability. In making such a successor-in-interest 
    determination, the Department examines several factors including, but 
    not limited to, changes in: (1) management; (2) production facilities; 
    (3) supplier relationships; and (4) customer base. See, e.g., Brass of 
    Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 57 FR 20460 (May 13, 1992) 
    (Canadian Brass). While no one or several of these factors will 
    necessarily provide a dispositive indication, the Department will 
    generally consider the new company to be the successor to the previous 
    company if its resulting operation is similar to that of its 
    predecessor. See, e.g., Industrial Phosphoric Acid from Israel: Final 
    Results of Changed Circumstances Review, 59 FR 6944 (February 14, 1994) 
    and Canadian Brass. This, if the evidence demonstrates that, with 
    respect to the production and sale of the subject merchandise, the new 
    company operates as the same business entity as the former company, the 
    Department will assign the new company the cash deposit rate of its 
    predecessor.
        We preliminarily determine that Kinn Salmon AS is the successor-in-
    interest to Skaarfish Group AS. Skaarfish Group AS has reorganized to 
    form two firms Skaarfish Pelagisk AS and Kinn Salmon AS. Kinn's 
    management is virtually identical to Skaarfish's. Kinn's business 
    operation, with respect to the subject merchandise are identical to the 
    salmon operations of Skaarfish. Kinn's production facilities are 
    unchanged as are its customer and supplier lists. Thus, Kinn Salmon AS 
    should receive the same antidumping duty treatment as the former 
    Skaarfish Group AS, i.e., a 2.30 percent antidumping duty cash deposit 
    rate.
        Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary 
    results. Any written comments may be submitted no later than 30 days 
    after date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to 
    arguments raised in case briefs, are due five days after the case brief 
    deadline. Case briefs and rebuttal briefs must be served on interested 
    parties in accordance with 19 CFR 351.309. The Department will publish 
    the final results of the changed circumstances review including the 
    results of any such comments.
        This initiation of review, preliminary results of review and notice 
    are in accordance with sections 751(b) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
    
        Dated: September 15, 1998.
    Robert S. LaRussa,
    Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
    [FR Doc. 98-25436 Filed 9-22-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
9/23/1998
Published:
09/23/1998
Department:
International Trade Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of initiation and preliminary results of changed circumstances antidumping duty administrative review.
Document Number:
98-25436
Dates:
September 23, 1998.
Pages:
50880-50881 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
A-403-801
PDF File:
98-25436.pdf