2021-20538. Certain Aluminum Foil From the Sultanate of Oman: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value  

  • Start Preamble

    AGENCY:

    Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

    SUMMARY:

    The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that imports of certain aluminum foil (aluminum foil) from the Sultanate of Oman (Oman) are being, or are likely to be, sold at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is July 1 2019, through June 30, 2020.

    DATES:

    Applicable September 23, 2021.

    Start Further Info

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

    Benjamin A. Smith, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2181.

    End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Background

    On May 4, 2021, Commerce published the Preliminary Determination of this LTFV investigation in the Federal Register , in which we also postponed the final determination until September 16, 2021.[1] This investigation concerns one mandatory respondent, Oman Aluminium Rolling Company LLC (OARC). We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Determination. A complete summary of the events that have occurred since publication of the Preliminary Determination may be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.[2]

    Scope of the Investigation

    The product covered by this investigation is aluminum foil from the Sultanate of Oman. For a complete description of the scope of this investigation, see Appendix I.

    Scope Comments

    In accordance with the Preamble to Commerce's regulations,[3] the Initiation Notice[4] set aside a period of time for parties to raise issues regarding product coverage ( i.e., scope).[5] Certain interested parties commented on the scope of the investigation as it appeared in the Initiation Notice, and we addressed these comments in the Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum.[6] Interested parties were provided an opportunity to comment on the Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum.[7] We received no scope briefs requesting changes to the scope of the antidumping or countervailing duty investigations of aluminum foil from the Republic of Armenia, Brazil, the Sultanate of Oman, the Russian Federation, and the Republic of Turkey. Additionally, we received a letter from the petitioners [8] urging Commerce to maintain the same scope language which was set forth in both the Initiation Notice or Preliminary Determination.[9] Accordingly, Commerce is not modifying the scope language as it appeared in the Initiation Notice or Preliminary Determination. See the appendix to this notice for the final scope of the investigation.

    Analysis of Comments Received

    We addressed all issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. The issues are identified in Appendix II of this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users Start Printed Page 52877 at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/​frn/​.

    Verification

    Commerce was unable to conduct on-site verification of the official record when making our final determination in this investigation. However, we took additional steps in lieu of an on-site verification to verify the information relied upon in making this final determination, in accordance with section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).[10]

    Changes Since the Preliminary Determination

    Based on our analysis of the comments received from parties, we have made certain revisions to the margin calculation for OARC. For a discussion of these changes, see the “Changes from the Preliminary Determination” section of the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

    All-Others Rate

    Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that the estimated weighted-average dumping margin for all other producers and exporters not individually investigated shall be equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated excluding rates that are zero, de minimis, or determined entirely under section 776 of the Act.

    Commerce calculated an individual estimated weighted-average dumping margin for OARC, the only individually-examined exporter/producer in this investigation. Because the only individually calculated dumping margin is not zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts otherwise available, the estimated weighted-average dumping margin calculated for OARC is the margin assigned to all other producers and exporters, pursuant to section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act.

    Final Determination

    The final estimated weighted-average dumping margins are as follows:

    Producers/ExportersWeighted- average dumping margins (percent)
    Oman Aluminium Rolling Company LLC (OARC)3.89
    All Others3.89

    Disclosure

    Commerce intends to disclose to interested parties the calculations performed for this final determination within five days of any public announcement or, if there is no public announcement, within five days of the date of publication of this notice, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

    Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation

    In accordance with section 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue to suspend the liquidation of all appropriate entries of subject merchandise, as described in Appendix I of this notice, entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after May 4, 2021, the date of publication in the Federal Register of the affirmative Preliminary Determination.

    Pursuant to section 735(c)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(d), where appropriate, we will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit for such entries of merchandise equal to the following: (1) The cash deposit rate for the respondents listed above will be equal to the company-specific estimated weighted-average dumping margins determined in this final determination; (2) if the exporter is not identified above, but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be equal to the company-specific estimated weighted-average dumping margin established for that producer of the subject merchandise; and (3) the cash deposit rate for all other producers and exporters will be equal to the all-others estimated weighted-average dumping margin. These suspension of liquidation instructions will remain in effect until further notice.

    To determine the cash deposit rate, Commerce normally adjusts the estimated weighted-average dumping margin by the amount of export subsidies countervailed in a companion CVD proceeding, when CVD provisional measures are in effect. Accordingly, where we preliminarily make an affirmative determination for countervailable export subsidies, we offset the estimated weighted-average dumping margin by the appropriate CVD rate. However, in the companion CVD final determination, we did not countervail any export subsidies.[11] Accordingly, we made no adjustment for export subsidy offsets to the estimated weighted-average dumping margin.

    International Trade Commission Notification

    In accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, we will notify the International Trade Commission (ITC) of the final affirmative determination of sales at LTFV. Because Commerce's final determination is affirmative, in accordance with section 735(b)(2) of the Act, the ITC will make its final determination as to whether the domestic industry in the United States is materially injured, or threatened with material injury, by reason of imports or sales (or the likelihood of sales) for importation of aluminum foil no later than 45 days after this final determination. If the ITC determines that such injury does not exist, this proceeding will be terminated, and all cash deposits posted will be refunded and suspension of liquidation will be lifted. If the ITC determines that such injury does exist, Commerce will issue an antidumping duty order directing CBP to assess, upon further instruction by Commerce, antidumping duties on all imports of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the effective date of the suspension of liquidation, as discussed above in the “Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation” section.

    Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.

    Notification to Interested Parties

    This determination and this notice are issued and published in accordance with sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.210(c).

    Start Signature
    Start Printed Page 52878

    Dated: September 16, 2021.

    Ryan Majerus,

    Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations.

    End Signature

    Appendix I—Scope of the Investigation

    The merchandise covered by this investigation is aluminum foil having a thickness of 0.2 mm or less, in reels exceeding 25 pounds, regardless of width. Aluminum foil is made from an aluminum alloy that contains more than 92 percent aluminum. Aluminum foil may be made to ASTM specification ASTM B479, but can also be made to other specifications. Regardless of specification, however, all aluminum foil meeting the scope description is included in the scope, including aluminum foil to which lubricant has been applied to one or both sides of the foil.

    Excluded from the scope of this investigation is aluminum foil that is backed with paper, paperboard, plastics, or similar backing materials on one side or both sides of the aluminum foil, as well as etched capacitor foil and aluminum foil that is cut to shape. Where the nominal and actual measurements vary, a product is within the scope if application of either the nominal or actual measurement would place it within the scope based on the definitions set forth above. The products under investigation are currently classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 7607.11.3000, 7607.11.6090, 7607.11.9030, 7607.11.9060, 7607.11.9090, and 7607.19.6000.

    Further, merchandise that falls within the scope of this proceeding may also be entered into the United States under HTSUS subheadings 7606.11.3060, 7606.11.6000, 7606.12.3045, 7606.12.3055, 7606.12.3091, 7606.12.3096, 7606.12.6000, 7606.91.3095, 7606.91.6095, 7606.92.3035, and 7606.92.6095. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this investigation is dispositive.

    Appendix II—List of Topics Discussed in the Final Decision Memorandum

    I. Summary

    II. Background

    III. Changes Since the Preliminary Determination

    IV. Discussion of Comments

    Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should Continue to Find that OARC is Affiliated with Sohar Aluminium by Means of Common Control of Both Entities by OQ

    Comment 2: Whether the Price Used by Commerce for Sohar Aluminium's Input Purchased from an Affiliated Party is an Appropriate Market Price

    Comment 3: Whether Commerce Made Clerical Errors when Calculating Total Cost of Manufacturing and Currency Conversions of Third Country Market Variables

    V. Recommendation

    End Supplemental Information

    Footnotes

    1.   See Certain Aluminum Foil from the Sultanate of Oman: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less than Fair Value, Postponement of Final Determination, and Extension of Provisional Measures, 86 FR 23681 (May 4, 2021) ( Preliminary Determination ), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.

    Back to Citation

    2.   See Memorandum, “Decision Memorandum for the Final Affirmative Determination in the Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation of Certain Aluminum Foil from the Sultanate of Oman,” dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).

    Back to Citation

    3.   See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties, Final Rule, 62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997).

    Back to Citation

    4.   See Certain Aluminum Foil from the Republic of Armenia, Brazil, the Sultanate of Oman, the Russian Federation, and the Republic of Turkey: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 85 FR 67711 (October 26, 2020) ( Initiation Notice ).

    Back to Citation

    6.   See Memorandum, “Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations of Certain Aluminum Foil from the Republic of Armenia, Brazil, the Sultanate of Oman, the Russian Federation, and the Republic of Turkey: Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum,” dated April 27, 2021 (Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum).

    Back to Citation

    8.  The Aluminum Association Trade Enforcement Working Group and its individual members, Granges America Inc., JW Aluminum Company and Novelis Corporation constitute the petitioners.

    Back to Citation

    9.   See Petitioners' Letter, “Certain Aluminum Foil from the Republic of Armenia, Brazil, the Sultanate of Oman, the Russian Federation, and the Republic of Turkey—Petitioners' Final Scope Comments,” dated September 8, 2021.

    Back to Citation

    10.   See Commerce's Letter, “Questionnaire in Lieu of Verification for Oman Aluminium Rolling Company LLC,” dated June 4, 2021; see also OARC's Letter, “Aluminum Foil from Oman: Response Questionnaire in Lieu of Verification,” dated June 11, 2021.

    Back to Citation

    11.   See unpublished Federal Register notice, “Certain Aluminum Foil from the Sultanate of Oman: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination,” dated concurrently with this notice.

    Back to Citation

    [FR Doc. 2021-20538 Filed 9-22-21; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

Document Information

Published:
09/23/2021
Department:
International Trade Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
2021-20538
Dates:
Applicable September 23, 2021.
Pages:
52876-52878 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
A-523-815
PDF File:
2021-20538.pdf
Supporting Documents:
» Requests for Nominations: Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee
» Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Investigations, Orders, or Reviews: Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic of China; Recission
» Determinations of Sales at Less than Fair Value: Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to-Length Plate from Brazil, South Africa, and Republic of Turkey
» Meetings: United States Travel and Tourism Advisory Board
» Investigations; Determinations, Modifications, and Rulings, etc.: Solid Fertilizer Grade Ammonium Nitrate from the Russian Federation
» Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Investigations, Orders, or Reviews: Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Republic of Turkey
» Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Investigations, Orders, or Reviews: Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to-Length Plate from People's Republic of China
» Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Investigations, Orders, or Reviews: Pasta from Italy
» Determinations of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Truck and Bus Tires From People's Republic of China
» Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Investigations, Orders, or Reviews: Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review