99-24890. Upper North Fork 25 Fire Restoration, Wenatchee National Forest, Chelan County, WA  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 185 (Friday, September 24, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 51730-51732]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-24890]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Forest Service
    
    
    Upper North Fork 25 Fire Restoration, Wenatchee National Forest, 
    Chelan County, WA
    
    AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The USDA, Forest Service will prepare an environmental impact
    
    [[Page 51731]]
    
    statement (EIS) to analyze and disclose the environmental impacts of a 
    site specific proposal for the Upper North 25 Fire Restoration. The 
    proposed action is approximately 20 miles northwest of the town of 
    Chelan, Washington on approximately 800 acres of National Forest System 
    Land in the North Fork 25 Mile Creek drainage on the Chelan Ranger 
    District of the Wenatchee National Forest. It includes part of an area 
    identified in Appendix C of the 1990 Wenatchee National Forest Land and 
    Resource Management Plan as the Stormy Mountain Inventoried Roadless 
    Area. It excludes the portion of that area allocated by the plan to 
    roadless recreation. The purpose of the EIS will be to develop and 
    evaluate a range of alternatives for ecosystem restoration activities 
    within the area of upper North Fork 25 Mile Creek that was burned by 
    the 1998 North 25 Fire. The objectives include: (1) Protecting/
    restoring existing late-successional habitat; (2) creating 
    heterogeneity in the distribution of woody fuel and snags; (3) 
    salvaging fire killed/injured trees; (4) maintaining site productivity; 
    and (5) promoting recovery of riparian areas. To achieve these 
    objectives, the alternatives may include the following actions: Snag/
    tree removal, snag falling, and prescribed fire.
        The alternatives will include a no action alternative and at least 
    one alternative that proposes no action within the Stormy Mountain 
    Inventoried Roadless Area. The proposed project will be consistent with 
    direction given in the Wenatchee National Forest Land and Resource 
    Management Plan, as amended by the April 1994 Record of Decision for 
    Amendments to the Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management Planning 
    Documents Within the Range of the Northern Spotted Owl. This Forest 
    Service proposal is scheduled for implementation between the years 2000 
    and 2005. The agency invites written comments on the scope of this 
    project. In addition, the agency gives notice of this analysis so that 
    interested and affected people are aware of how they may participate 
    and contribute to the final decision.
    
    DATES: Comments concerning the scope and analysis of this proposal must 
    be post-marked by October 22, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and suggestions concerning the scope 
    of the analysis to Al Murphy, District Ranger, Chelan Ranger District, 
    428 West Woodin Avenue, Chelan, Washington 98816.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions and comments about this EIS 
    should be directed to Matt Dahlgreen, Interdisciplinary Team Leader, 
    Entiat Ranger District, PO Box 476, Entiat, Washington 98822; phone 
    509-784-1511, extension 524.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This analysis was prompted by the North 25 
    Fire Restoration Environmental Analysis which was conducted in response 
    to the North 25 Fire of 1998. During that analysis, vegetation 
    treatments within the Stormy Mountain Inventoried Roadless Area and 
    adjacent unroaded areas were dropped in response to public concern 
    about roadless area issues. The Upper North 25 Fire EIS analysis will 
    re-evaluate the effects of alternative treatments, designed to meet the 
    objectives summarized above, within these unroaded areas.
        The proposed action is to treat approximately 855 acres within the 
    upper watershed of the North Fork 25 Mile Creek. The area proposed for 
    treatment within the Inventoried Roadless Area was allocated to Late 
    Successional Reserves by the amended Wenatchee National Forest Land and 
    Resource Management Plan. The objective of this allocation is to 
    maintain and enhance late-successional forest ecosystems and protect 
    them from loss due to large-scale fire, insect and disease epidemics, 
    and major human impacts. Treatments would include replanting of a 
    portion of the burned area and commercial or noncommercial salvage of 
    trees killed directly by the fire or indirectly by Douglas-fir bark 
    beetles using both helicopter and skyline logging methods. No new roads 
    would be constructed.
        To date, the following key issues have been identified: ecosystem 
    sustainability and biodiversity; roadless character; and scenic 
    quality.
        The decision to be made through this analysis is whether 
    restoration treatments should be implemented within the Upper 25 Mile 
    Fire Analysis Area, and if so, where, how, and to what extent.
        A range of alternatives will be considered, including a no action 
    alternative, and at least one alternative that proposes no action 
    within the Stormy Mountain Inventoried Roadless Area. Other 
    alternatives will be developed in response to relevant issues received 
    during scoping. All alternatives will need to respond to specific 
    conditions in the Upper North Fork 25 Mile Creek Analysis Area.
        Public participation will be especially important at several points 
    during the analysis. The Forest Service will be seeking information, 
    comments, and assistance from Federal, State, tribes, and local 
    agencies, as well as individuals or organizations who may be interested 
    in or affected by the proposed actions. This information will be used 
    in preparation of the draft EIS. The scoping process includes:
        1. Identifying potential issues.
        2. Identifying issues to be analyzed in depth.
        3. Eliminating non-significant issues or those which have been 
    covered by a relevant previous environmental process.
        4. Exploring additional alternatives.
        5. Identifying potential environmental effects of the proposed 
    action and alternatives (i.e., direct, indirect, and cumulative effects 
    and connected actions).
        6. Determining potential cooperating agencies and task assignments.
        Comments received in response to this notice, including names and 
    addresses of those who comment, will be considered part of the public 
    record on this proposed action and will be available for public 
    inspection. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and 
    considered; however, those who submit anonymous comments will not have 
    standing to appeal the subsequent decision under 36 CFR parts 215 or 
    217. Additionally, pursuant to 7 CFR 1.27(d), any person may request 
    the agency to withhold a submission from the public record by showing 
    how the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) permits such confidentiality. 
    Persons requesting such confidentiality should be aware that under the 
    FOIA, confidentiality may be granted in only very limited 
    circumstances, such as to protect trade secrets. The Forest Service 
    will inform the requester of the agency's decision regarding the 
    request for confidentiality, and where the request is denied, the 
    agency will return the submission and notify the requester that the 
    comments may be resubmitted with or without name and address within a 
    specified number of days.
        The draft EIS is expected to be filed with the Environmental 
    Protection Agency (EPA) and to be available for public review in 
    December 1999. The comment period on the draft EIS will be 45 days from 
    the date the EPA's Notice of Availability appears in the Federal 
    Register. Copies of the draft EIS will be distributed to interested and 
    affected agencies, organizations, tribes and members of the public for 
    their review and comment. It is very important that those interested in 
    the management of the Wenatchee National Forest participate at that 
    time.
    
    [[Page 51732]]
    
        To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues 
    and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft EIS should 
    be as specific as possible. It is also helpful if comments refer to 
    specific pages or chapters of the draft EIS. Comments may also address 
    the adequacy of the draft EIS or the merits of the alternatives 
    formulated and discussed in the statement. (Reviewers may wish to refer 
    to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing 
    the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 
    40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.)
        At this early stage, the Forest Service believes it is important to 
    give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public 
    participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of 
    a draft EIS must structure their participation in the environmental 
    review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and alerts an agency to 
    the reviewer's position and contentions (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power 
    Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978)). Also environmental objections 
    that could be raised at the draft EIS stage but that are not raised 
    until after completion of the final EIS may be waived or dismissed by 
    the courts. (City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 f. 24d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 
    1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 
    (E.D. Wis. 1980)). Because of these court rulings, it is very important 
    that those interested in this proposed action participate by the close 
    of the comment period so that substantive comments and objections are 
    made available to the Forest Service at a time when it can meaningfully 
    consider them and respond to them in the final EIS.
        The final EIS is scheduled to be completed in March 2000. In the 
    final EIS, the Forest Service is required to respond to comments and 
    responses received during the comment period that pertain to the 
    environmental consequences discussed in the draft EIS and applicable 
    laws, regulations, and policies considered in making the decision 
    regarding this proposal. The Forest Service is the lead agency for this 
    environmental analysis. The responsible official is the Chelan District 
    Ranger. The responsible official will document the Upper North Fork 25 
    Fire Restoration decision and reasons for the decision in a Record of 
    Decision. That decision will be subject to Forest Service Appeal 
    Regulations (36 CFR part 215).
    
        Dated: September 14, 1999.
    Al Murphy,
    Chelan District Ranger.
    [FR Doc. 99-24890 Filed 9-23-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
09/24/1999
Department:
Forest Service
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
Document Number:
99-24890
Dates:
Comments concerning the scope and analysis of this proposal must be post-marked by October 22, 1999.
Pages:
51730-51732 (3 pages)
PDF File:
99-24890.pdf