96-24605. Cotton Shop Towels from Pakistan; Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 187 (Wednesday, September 25, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 50273-50276]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-24605]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    [C-535-001]
    
    
    Cotton Shop Towels from Pakistan; Preliminary Results of 
    Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews
    
    AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
    Department of Commerce.
    
    ACTION: Notice of preliminary results of countervailing duty 
    administrative reviews.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting 
    administrative reviews of the countervailing duty order on cotton shop 
    towels from Pakistan. For administrative convenience, the Department is 
    combining the reviews covering the periods January 1, 1992 through 
    December 31, 1992 (1992) and January 1, 1993 through December 31, 1993 
    (1993). We preliminarily determine the net subsidy to be 7.81 percent 
    ad valorem for all companies for 1992. For 1993, we preliminarily 
    determine the net subsidy to be 11.50 percent ad valorem for Eastern 
    Textiles (Eastern), 11.54 percent ad valorem for Creation (Pvt.), Ltd. 
    (Creation), and 5.02 percent ad valorem for all other companies. If the 
    final results remain the same as these preliminary results of 
    administrative reviews, we will instruct the U.S. Customs Service to 
    assess countervailing duties as indicated above. Interested parties are 
    invited to comment on these preliminary results.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: September 25, 1996.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne D'Alauro or Lorenza Olivas, 
    Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
    Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., 
    Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2786.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        On March 9, 1984, the Department published in the Federal Register 
    (49 FR 8974) the countervailing duty order on cotton shop towels from 
    Pakistan. On March 12, 1993, the Department published a notice of 
    ``Opportunity to Request Administrative Review'' (58 FR 13583) of this 
    countervailing duty order for 1992. We received a timely request for 
    review from Milliken & Company (Milliken), a U.S. producer of the 
    subject merchandise and the petitioner in the original investigation. 
    For 1993, the notice of ``Opportunity to Request Administrative 
    Review'' was published on March 4, 1994 (59 FR 10368). Milliken, as 
    well as the Government of Pakistan, the Towel Manufacturers Association 
    of Pakistan and exporters of shop towels from Pakistan requested a 
    review for this period. We initiated the 1992 and 1993 reviews on May 
    6, 1993 (58 FR 26960) and April 15, 1994 (59 FR 18099), respectively. 
    The 1992 review covers 17 manufacturers/exporters of the subject 
    merchandise. The 1993 review covers 20 manufacturers/exporters. The 
    reviewed exporters account for virtually all exports of the subject 
    merchandise. Both reviews cover five programs.
    
    Applicable Statute and Regulations
    
        The Department is conducting these administrative reviews in 
    accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 
    (the Act). Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the statute and 
    to the Department's regulations are in reference to the provisions as 
    they existed on December 31, 1994. However, references to the 
    Department's Countervailing Duties; Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and 
    Request for Public Comments (54 FR 23366; May 31, 1989) (Proposed 
    Regulations), are provided solely for further explanation of the 
    Department's countervailing duty practice. Although the Department has 
    withdrawn the particular rulemaking proceeding pursuant to which the 
    Proposed Regulations were issued, the subject matter of these 
    regulations is being considered in connection with an ongoing 
    rulemaking proceeding which, among other things, is intended to conform 
    the Department's regulations to the Uruguay Round Agreements Act. See 
    60 FR 80 (Jan. 3, 1995).
    
    Scope of the Review
    
        The subject merchandise is cotton shop towels from Pakistan. During 
    the review periods, this merchandise was classifiable under item number
    
    [[Page 50274]]
    
    6307.10.20 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS). The HTS item number 
    is provided for convenience and Customs purposes. The written 
    description remains dispositive.
    
    Best Information Available (BIA) for Creation
    
        Section 776(c) of the Act requires the Department to use BIA 
    ``whenever a party or any other person refuses or is unable to produce 
    information requested in a timely manner and in the form required, or 
    otherwise significantly impedes an investigation.'' See also 19 CFR 
    section 355.37.
        In determining what rate to use as BIA, the Department follows a 
    two-tiered methodology. The Department assigns lower BIA rates to those 
    respondents who cooperated in an administrative review (tier two) and 
    rates based on more adverse assumptions to respondents who did not 
    cooperate, or significantly impeded the proceeding (tier one). See 
    Allied Signal Aerospace Co. v. United States, 996 F. 2d 1185 (Fed. Cir. 
    1993), aff'd, 28 F. 3d 1188, cert. denied, 1995 U.S. Lexis 100 (1995). 
    Creation, an exporter during 1993, did not respond to the Department's 
    initial or two supplemental questionnaires. However, the Government of 
    Pakistan provided information regarding Creation's volume and value of 
    exports during the 1993 administrative review period and regarding 
    Creation's non-use of certain programs during that review period. For 
    these preliminary results, we have utilized the information provided by 
    the Government of Pakistan to the extent that it permitted us to 
    calculate a program-specific rate for Creation. See Certain Steel 
    Products from Italy; Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty 
    Determinations (58 FR 37327, 37329; July 9, 1993). In the case of two 
    programs, this information was inadequate and, in accordance with 
    section 776 of the Act, we assigned to Creation a tier-one BIA rate for 
    those programs for 1993. This tier one BIA rate is the highest 
    individual rate found, either in the investigation or in a subsequent 
    administrative review, for these programs.
        Most companies did not provide information regarding the benefits 
    earned under the Income Tax Reduction Program. For these companies, we 
    used tier one BIA for this program in both reviews. Eight others 
    attempted to cooperate but provided inadequate information as to the 
    benefit earned under this program during 1993. For these companies, we 
    used tier two BIA.
    
    Calculation Methodology for Assessment and Cash Deposit Purposes
    
        In accordance with Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. v. United States, 
    853 F. Supp. 431 (CIT 1994), we calculated the net subsidy on a 
    country-wide basis by first calculating the total subsidy rate for each 
    company subject to the administrative review. We then weighted the rate 
    received by each company using as the weight its share of total 
    Pakistani exports to the United States of subject merchandise, 
    including all companies, even those with de minimis and zero rates. We 
    then summed the individual companies' weighted rates to determine the 
    country-wide, weighted-average subsidy rate from all programs 
    benefitting exports of subject merchandise to the United States.
        Since the country-wide rate calculated using this methodology was 
    above de minimis, as defined by 19 CFR 355.7 (1994), for each review 
    period, we examined the net subsidy rate calculated for each company to 
    determine whether individual company rates differed significantly from 
    the weighted-average country-wide rate, pursuant to 19 CFR 
    355.22(d)(3). None of the companies had net subsidy rates which were 
    significantly different during the 1992 review period pursuant to 19 
    CFR 355.22(d)(3). Therefore, all companies are assigned the country-
    wide rate in 1992. In 1993, Eastern had a significantly different rate. 
    Based on BIA, Creation also had a significantly different rate. These 
    companies are treated separately for assessment and cash deposit 
    purposes. All other companies are assigned the country-wide rate.
    
    Analysis of Programs
    
    I. Programs Previously Determined to Confer Bounties or Grants
    
    A. Export Financing
        The Export Finance Scheme (EFS), which is administered by the State 
    Bank of Pakistan, grants short-term loans at below-market interest 
    rates to exporters. The EFS has two parts. Under Part I, exporters may 
    obtain financing on irrevocable letters of credit or firm export 
    orders. Under Part II, exporters may obtain financing in the form of a 
    credit line based upon the value of the previous year's eligible 
    exports. The Department found this program countervailable in the 
    investigation (see Cotton Shop Towels from Pakistan: Final Affirmative 
    Countervailing Duty Determination (49 FR 1408; January 11, 1984)) 
    (investigation) and in all subsequent reviews in accordance with 
    section 771(5) of the Act because receipt of this benefit was based 
    solely on export performance and the interest rates were preferential. 
    There has been no new information or evidence of changed circumstances 
    in these reviews to warrant reconsideration of this program's 
    countervailability.
        During the review periods, shop towel exporters made interest 
    payments on loans obtained under Part I of the EFS. The interest rates 
    ranged between 7 percent and 11 percent. Loan terms require payment 
    within a maximum of 150 days. As our benchmark, we used the national 
    average commercial rates for short-term credit which was reported by 
    the Government of Pakistan. These rates were 14.5 percent applicable in 
    1991, 14 percent in 1992, and 15.5 percent in 1993.
        To calculate the benefit, we took the difference between the actual 
    interest paid and the interest that would have been paid if the loans 
    had been obtained at commercial rates. See Final Affirmative 
    Countervailing Duty Determination: Certain Carbon Steel Butt-Welded 
    Pipe Fittings From India (60 FR 10564; February 27, 1995). For loans 
    obtained under Part I of the EFS, the financing reported was specific 
    to shipments made to the United States. We received no information 
    indicating that loans were received under Part II. For this reason, 
    where we could not determine if loans were obtained under Part I or 
    Part II, we assumed that they were obtained under Part I and were 
    specifically benefitting subject merchandise exports to the United 
    States. Therefore, we divided the benefit derived from Part I loans by 
    total exports of subject merchandise to the United States. On this 
    basis, we preliminarily determine the net subsidy from this program for 
    1992 to be 0.72 percent ad valorem for all manufacturers and exporters 
    in Pakistan of shop towels. For 1993, we preliminarily determine the 
    net subsidy from this program to be 0.49 percent ad valorem for all 
    manufacturers and exporters in Pakistan of shop towels, except for 
    Eastern, who has a significantly different subsidy rate. The rate for 
    Eastern is 6.31 percent ad valorem. As BIA, we assigned to Creation the 
    rate determined for Eastern in the 1993 review, because it is the 
    highest rate calculated for any company that used this program in any 
    administrative review.
    B. Excise Tax, Sales Tax and Customs Duty Rebate Programs
        The Central Bureau of Revenue administers the rebate of excise 
    taxes, sales taxes and customs duties on both
    
    [[Page 50275]]
    
    domestic and imported inputs used in exported products. The excise tax 
    rebate applicable to cotton shop towels during the review periods was 
    6.0 percent from January 1, 1992 through September 27, 1992, 4.72 
    percent from September 28, 1992 through July 13, 1993, and 1.79 percent 
    from July 14, 1993 through December 31, 1993. This rebate is calculated 
    on the basis of the f.o.b. value of exports. There was no rebate of 
    sales taxes or customs duties in either review period.
        In the investigation and subsequent reviews, we found the program 
    countervailable because the Government of Pakistan failed to establish 
    the requisite linkage and comparison between taxes paid and rebates 
    provided. In this review, the Government of Pakistan did not provide 
    new information to establish the required linkage. Therefore, we 
    preliminarily determine that the Government of Pakistan pays these 
    rebates without regard to specific taxes incurred in the production of 
    shop towels and that the full amount of the rebate is countervailable 
    because the rebate is contingent upon export performance. See 
    Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review: 
    Cotton Shop Towels from Pakistan (58 FR 32104; June 8, 1993) and Final 
    Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review: Cotton Shop 
    Towels from Pakistan (58 FR 48038; September 14, 1993).
        These cash rebates are earned on a sale-by-sale basis, and a firm 
    can precisely calculate the amount of rebate it will receive for each 
    export sale at the moment the sale is made. Because the amount of these 
    rebates is known at the time of export, we calculate the benefit from 
    this rebate program on an ``as-earned'' basis for all exporters, 
    including Creation. To calculate the benefit, we separately weight-
    averaged the rates applicable to cotton shop towel exports during the 
    1992 and 1993 review periods. On this basis, we preliminarily determine 
    the net subsidy from these programs to be 5.67 percent ad valorem for 
    all manufacturers and exporters in Pakistan of shop towels during 1992. 
    For 1993, we preliminarily determine the net subsidy from these 
    programs to be 3.35 percent ad valorem for all manufacturers and 
    exporters in Pakistan of shop towels, including Creation.
    C. Income Tax Reductions
        Before July 1992, the Government of Pakistan provided firms with a 
    maximum 50-percent reduction of their income taxes on income generated 
    from exports. The percentage of the reduction depended on the size of 
    the company and the form of business ownership. In case of a loss 
    (i.e., where there was no tax liability), the export income tax credit 
    could be carried forward to the following year as an offset against 
    income. In accordance with section 771(5) of the Act, the Department 
    found this program countervailable in the investigation and all 
    subsequent reviews because receipt of this benefit was contingent upon 
    export performance. There has been no information provided in this 
    review to warrant reconsideration of this program's countervailability.
        This program was modified in 1992. Effective July 1, 1992, the 
    Finance Act 1992, under section 80cc of the Income Tax Ordinance, 
    required the commercial banks to withhold the income tax at source from 
    all foreign exchange proceeds. The amount withheld becomes the 
    company's final tax liability irrespective of whether or not the 
    company is profitable. Eligible exporters continued to receive a tax 
    reduction rate on export earnings. For shop towel exporters, the 
    reduction was 0.50 percent of total export earnings.
        To calculate the benefit to each company, we subtracted the total 
    amount of income tax the company actually paid during the review period 
    from the amount of tax the company would have paid during the review 
    period had it not claimed any reductions under the Income Tax Reduction 
    Program. We then divided this difference by the value of the company's 
    total exports. See Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty 
    Administrative Review; Certain Iron Metal Castings From India (61 FR 
    25623; May 22, 1996). For those companies which did not provide 
    information regarding the benefits earned from these claimed reductions 
    in one or both reviews, we assumed that they received benefits from 
    this program, and assigned, as BIA, a rate of 1.88 percent, the highest 
    rate found, either in the investigation or in a subsequent 
    administrative review, for this program. We are using the highest rate 
    found under this program because respondents failed to provide needed 
    information even after the Department's repeated requests for the 
    information from the shop towel exporters. In those instances where an 
    exporter cooperated by attempting to provide data, but failed to 
    provide adequate information on which to calculate accurately the 
    benefit during 1993, we relied on company-specific information provided 
    in the 1992 review for tier two BIA.
        On this basis, we preliminarily determine the net subsidy from this 
    program to be 1.42 percent ad valorem for all manufacturers and 
    exporters in shop towels from Pakistan during 1992. For 1993, we 
    preliminarily determine the net subsidy from this program to be 1.19 
    percent ad valorem for all manufacturers and exporters in Pakistan of 
    shop towels, except for Eastern Textiles and Creation, who had 
    significantly different overall subsidy rates. For Eastern, we 
    calculated the benefit to be 1.84 ad valorem. For Creation, we assigned 
    a tier one BIA rate of 1.88 percent ad valorem because it is the 
    highest rate calculated for any company that used this program in any 
    administrative review.
    
    II. Other Programs
    
        We examined the following programs and preliminarily determine that 
    exporters of cotton shop towels did not apply for or receive benefits 
    under them during the review periods:
         Import Duty Rebates
         Export Credit Insurance
    
    Preliminary Results of Reviews
    
        For 1992, we preliminarily determine the net subsidy to be 7.81 
    percent ad valorem for all companies. For 1993, we preliminarily 
    determine the net subsidy to be 11.50 percent ad valorem for Eastern, 
    11.54 percent ad valorem for Creation and 5.02 percent ad valorem for 
    all other companies.
        If the final results of these reviews remain the same as these 
    preliminary results, the Department intends to instruct the U.S. 
    Customs Service to assess countervailing duties of 7.81 percent ad 
    valorem for all shipments of the subject merchandise exported from 
    Pakistan on or after January 1, 1992 and on or before December 31, 
    1992. For all shipments of the subject merchandise exported from 
    Pakistan on or after January 1, 1993 and on or before December 31, 
    1993, the Department intends to instruct the U.S. Customs Service to 
    assess countervailing duties of 11.50 percent ad valorem for all 
    shipments of the subject merchandise from Eastern, 11.54 percent ad 
    valorem for all shipments of the subject merchandise from Creation and 
    5.02 percent ad valorem from all others.
        The Department also intends to instruct the U.S. Customs Service to 
    collect a cash deposit of estimated countervailing duties of 11.50 
    percent of the f.o.b. invoice price on all shipments of this 
    merchandise from Eastern, 11.54 percent of the f.o.b. invoice price on 
    all shipments of this merchandise from Creation, and 5.02 percent of 
    the f.o.b. invoice price from all others on all shipments of this 
    merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
    
    [[Page 50276]]
    
    consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of 
    these reviews.
        Parties to the proceeding may request disclosure of the calculation 
    methodology and interested parties may request a hearing not later than 
    10 days after the date of publication of this notice. Interested 
    parties may submit written arguments in case briefs on these 
    preliminary results within 30 days of the date of publication. Rebuttal 
    briefs, limited to arguments raised in case briefs, may be submitted 
    seven days after the time limit for filing the case brief. Parties who 
    submit written arguments in this proceeding are requested to submit 
    with the argument (1) a statement of the issue and (2) a brief summary 
    of the argument. Any hearing, if requested, will be held seven days 
    after the scheduled date for submission of rebuttal briefs. Copies of 
    case briefs and rebuttal briefs must be served on interested parties in 
    accordance with 19 CFR 355.38(e).
        Representatives of parties to the proceedings may request 
    disclosure of proprietary information under administrative protective 
    order no later than 10 days after the representative's client or 
    employer becomes a party to the proceedings, but in no event later than 
    the date the case briefs are due. The Department will publish the final 
    results of these administrative reviews, including the results of its 
    analysis of issues raised in any case or rebuttal brief or at a 
    hearing.
        This administrative review and notice are in accordance with 
    section 751(a)(1) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1)) and 19 CFR 355.22.
    
        Dated: September 16, 1996.
    Robert S. LaRussa,
    Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
    [FR Doc. 96-24605 Filed 9-24-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
09/25/1996
Department:
Commerce Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of preliminary results of countervailing duty administrative reviews.
Document Number:
96-24605
Dates:
September 25, 1996.
Pages:
50273-50276 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
C-535-001
PDF File:
96-24605.pdf